首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Planetary Health最新文献

英文 中文
Environmental impact of minimally invasive procedures: lifecycle assessment of two hospital care pathways 微创手术的环境影响:两种医院护理途径的生命周期评估
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101348
Eva Sayone Cohen , Lisanne HJA Kouwenberg , Hannah V Dürager , Lynn E Snijder , Jesse Lammerts , Martijn van Bodegraven , Dionne S Kringos , Nicolaas H Sperna Weiland , Wouter JK Hehenkamp

Background

If the health-care sector were a country, it would rank as the fifth-largest environmental polluter globally. Minimally invasive procedures are particularly resource-intensive and energy-intensive, highlighting the importance of assessing their environmental impact in addition to their clinical benefits. In this study, we quantified the environmental impacts of two minimally invasive, clinically equivalent treatments for uterine fibroids: uterine artery embolisation (non-surgical) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (surgical).

Methods

This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. Using comparative lifecycle assessment, we evaluated care pathways from outpatient appointments to follow-up visits, based on 40 waste inventories, considering material production, energy use, pharmaceutical production, sterilisation, transport, waste disposal, and recycling.

Findings

The embolisation procedure generated a median of 3·9 kg waste and 39 kg CO2-equivalents (CO2-eq), compared to 7·9 kg of waste and 120 kg of CO2-eq generated by the hysterectomy procedure. When accounting for both hospitalisation and outpatient visits, 9 kg of waste and 215 kg of CO2-eq were generated by the embolisation procedure and 6 kg of waste and 186 kg of CO2-eq were generated by the hysterectomy pathway. Key contributors to environmental impact included patient and staff travel; electricity consumption for heating, ventilation and air-conditioning; and single-use items.

Interpretation

This study reveals the overall environmental footprint of two minimally invasive treatments in gynaecology and identifies key areas for mitigation strategies within each care pathway. Comprehensive environmental impact assessments can offer valuable insights for health-care systems that aim to balance clinical effectiveness with environmental sustainability.

Funding

Amsterdam University Medical Centre Doctoral School.
如果医疗保健行业是一个国家,它将成为全球第五大环境污染者。微创手术是资源密集型和能源密集型的,除了临床效益外,评估其环境影响也很重要。在这项研究中,我们量化了两种微创、临床等效的子宫肌瘤治疗方法:子宫动脉栓塞(非手术)和腹腔镜全子宫切除术(手术)对环境的影响。方法本研究在荷兰一家三级医院进行。使用比较生命周期评估,我们基于40份废物清单,考虑到材料生产、能源使用、药品生产、消毒、运输、废物处理和回收,评估了从门诊预约到随访的护理途径。研究结果:栓塞术产生的废物中位数为3.9 kg,二氧化碳当量为39 kg,而子宫切除术产生的废物中位数为7.9 kg,二氧化碳当量为120 kg。当考虑到住院和门诊就诊时,栓塞过程产生了9公斤废物和215公斤二氧化碳当量,子宫切除术途径产生了6公斤废物和186公斤二氧化碳当量。造成环境影响的主要因素包括病人和工作人员的旅行;供暖、通风和空调的用电量;还有一次性物品。本研究揭示了妇科两种微创治疗的总体环境足迹,并确定了每个护理途径中缓解策略的关键领域。全面的环境影响评估可以为旨在平衡临床有效性和环境可持续性的卫生保健系统提供有价值的见解。资助阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心博士学院。
{"title":"Environmental impact of minimally invasive procedures: lifecycle assessment of two hospital care pathways","authors":"Eva Sayone Cohen ,&nbsp;Lisanne HJA Kouwenberg ,&nbsp;Hannah V Dürager ,&nbsp;Lynn E Snijder ,&nbsp;Jesse Lammerts ,&nbsp;Martijn van Bodegraven ,&nbsp;Dionne S Kringos ,&nbsp;Nicolaas H Sperna Weiland ,&nbsp;Wouter JK Hehenkamp","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101348","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101348","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>If the health-care sector were a country, it would rank as the fifth-largest environmental polluter globally. Minimally invasive procedures are particularly resource-intensive and energy-intensive, highlighting the importance of assessing their environmental impact in addition to their clinical benefits. In this study, we quantified the environmental impacts of two minimally invasive, clinically equivalent treatments for uterine fibroids: uterine artery embolisation (non-surgical) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (surgical).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. Using comparative lifecycle assessment, we evaluated care pathways from outpatient appointments to follow-up visits, based on 40 waste inventories, considering material production, energy use, pharmaceutical production, sterilisation, transport, waste disposal, and recycling.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The embolisation procedure generated a median of 3·9 kg waste and 39 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub>-eq), compared to 7·9 kg of waste and 120 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>-eq generated by the hysterectomy procedure. When accounting for both hospitalisation and outpatient visits, 9 kg of waste and 215 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>-eq were generated by the embolisation procedure and 6 kg of waste and 186 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>-eq were generated by the hysterectomy pathway. Key contributors to environmental impact included patient and staff travel; electricity consumption for heating, ventilation and air-conditioning; and single-use items.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study reveals the overall environmental footprint of two minimally invasive treatments in gynaecology and identifies key areas for mitigation strategies within each care pathway. Comprehensive environmental impact assessments can offer valuable insights for health-care systems that aim to balance clinical effectiveness with environmental sustainability.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Amsterdam University Medical Centre Doctoral School.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 101348"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Making climate-sensitive health counselling acceptable for patients: insights form a mixed-methods study in Germany 让患者接受对气候敏感的健康咨询:来自德国一项混合方法研究的见解
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101369
Alina Herrmann , Claudia Quitmann , Silvan Griesel , Nicola Krippl , Helen Fischer , Jessica Nieder , Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle , Till Bärnighausen , Jan Schildmann , Rafael Mikolajczyk , Ina Danquah , Eva J Kantelhardt , Nikolaus C S Mezger

Background

Climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC) equips health professionals to incorporate climate change and health topics into patient communication. A key barrier to its implementation is uncertainty about how to deliver CSHC in a manner that is acceptable to patients. This study explored patient and physician perspectives on suitable topics and communication strategies for CSHC.

Methods

We applied a sequential mixed-methods design. We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with physicians and patients with experience in CSHC in Germany and analysed them using thematic analysis. Findings informed a cross-sectional online survey administered to an online panel in five German federal states, quantifying topic preference and testing acceptability of topics and communication strategies in a survey experiment with mixed factorial design. We analysed the survey using descriptive statistics and mixed ANOVA.

Findings

Qualitative interviews with physicians (n=18) and patients (n=27) identified key topics for CSHC: health impacts of climate change and adaptation strategies, climate-friendly lifestyle changes, climate anxiety, and climate action. Physicians reported uncertainty about referencing climate change explicitly in lifestyle counselling. Survey data (n=1491) revealed that 47% of participants wanted to receive CSHC in general, with over 70% being interested in adaptation strategies. Health-only framings in lifestyle counselling were more acceptable than climate-and-health framings (partial η2=0·18, p<0·001) in survey experiment. Yet, patients found climate-and-health framings acceptable in qualitative interviews, if delivered in a patient-centred manner.

Interpretation

CSHC can be acceptable to patients when topics and framings are carefully matched to individual health concerns and biopsychosocial background. Patient-centred communication might support integration of CSHC into routine care.

Funding

None.
气候敏感健康咨询(CSHC)使卫生专业人员能够将气候变化和健康主题纳入患者沟通。实施的一个关键障碍是不确定如何以患者可接受的方式提供CSHC。本研究探讨了患者和医生对CSHC的合适话题和沟通策略的看法。方法采用顺序混合方法设计。我们对德国有CSHC经验的医生和患者进行了定性深入访谈,并使用主题分析对其进行了分析。研究结果表明,在德国五个联邦州的一个在线小组中进行了一项横断面在线调查,量化了主题偏好,并在混合因子设计的调查实验中测试了主题和沟通策略的可接受性。我们使用描述性统计和混合方差分析分析调查。对医生(n=18)和患者(n=27)的定性访谈确定了CSHC的关键主题:气候变化对健康的影响和适应策略、气候友好型生活方式的改变、气候焦虑和气候行动。医生报告了在生活方式咨询中明确提及气候变化的不确定性。调查数据(n=1491)显示,47%的参与者总体上希望接受CSHC,超过70%的参与者对适应策略感兴趣。在调查实验中,生活方式咨询中健康框架比气候健康框架更容易被接受(偏η2= 0.18, p< 0.001)。然而,患者发现,如果以患者为中心的方式进行定性访谈,气候与健康框架是可以接受的。当主题和框架与个人健康问题和生物心理社会背景仔细匹配时,患者可以接受cshc。以患者为中心的沟通可能有助于将CSHC整合到常规护理中。
{"title":"Making climate-sensitive health counselling acceptable for patients: insights form a mixed-methods study in Germany","authors":"Alina Herrmann ,&nbsp;Claudia Quitmann ,&nbsp;Silvan Griesel ,&nbsp;Nicola Krippl ,&nbsp;Helen Fischer ,&nbsp;Jessica Nieder ,&nbsp;Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle ,&nbsp;Till Bärnighausen ,&nbsp;Jan Schildmann ,&nbsp;Rafael Mikolajczyk ,&nbsp;Ina Danquah ,&nbsp;Eva J Kantelhardt ,&nbsp;Nikolaus C S Mezger","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101369","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101369","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Climate-sensitive health counselling (CSHC) equips health professionals to incorporate climate change and health topics into patient communication. A key barrier to its implementation is uncertainty about how to deliver CSHC in a manner that is acceptable to patients. This study explored patient and physician perspectives on suitable topics and communication strategies for CSHC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We applied a sequential mixed-methods design. We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with physicians and patients with experience in CSHC in Germany and analysed them using thematic analysis. Findings informed a cross-sectional online survey administered to an online panel in five German federal states, quantifying topic preference and testing acceptability of topics and communication strategies in a survey experiment with mixed factorial design. We analysed the survey using descriptive statistics and mixed ANOVA.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Qualitative interviews with physicians (n=18) and patients (n=27) identified key topics for CSHC: health impacts of climate change and adaptation strategies, climate-friendly lifestyle changes, climate anxiety, and climate action. Physicians reported uncertainty about referencing climate change explicitly in lifestyle counselling. Survey data (n=1491) revealed that 47% of participants wanted to receive CSHC in general, with over 70% being interested in adaptation strategies. Health-only framings in lifestyle counselling were more acceptable than climate-and-health framings (partial η<sup>2</sup>=0·18, p&lt;0·001) in survey experiment. Yet, patients found climate-and-health framings acceptable in qualitative interviews, if delivered in a patient-centred manner.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>CSHC can be acceptable to patients when topics and framings are carefully matched to individual health concerns and biopsychosocial background. Patient-centred communication might support integration of CSHC into routine care.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>None.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 101369"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commercial determinants of active travel: a crucial but overlooked barrier to health and sustainability 积极旅行的商业决定因素:健康和可持续性的一个关键但被忽视的障碍。
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101340
Carmen Jochem , Karim Abu-Omar , Dorothea Baltruks , Adrian Bauman , Ding Ding , Sonja Kahlmeier , Lisa Paulsen , Lydia Reismann , Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich , Jens Bucksch
{"title":"Commercial determinants of active travel: a crucial but overlooked barrier to health and sustainability","authors":"Carmen Jochem ,&nbsp;Karim Abu-Omar ,&nbsp;Dorothea Baltruks ,&nbsp;Adrian Bauman ,&nbsp;Ding Ding ,&nbsp;Sonja Kahlmeier ,&nbsp;Lisa Paulsen ,&nbsp;Lydia Reismann ,&nbsp;Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich ,&nbsp;Jens Bucksch","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101340","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101340","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 11","pages":"Article 101340"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145293782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advances and future needs for modelling sustainable and just food systems transformations 可持续和公正的粮食系统转型建模的进展和未来需求。
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101385
Daniel Mason-D’Croz MA , Prof Mario Herrero PhD
Food systems underpin human health, livelihoods, and environmental sustainability; yet, they remain major contributors to climate change, biodiversity loss, and inequity. Building on the 2025 EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food systems, a special collection of papers in The Lancet Planetary Health highlights emerging frontiers for research and modelling. Across models, dietary change remains the most effective lever for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and land-use pressure from food production, although affordability and nutritional adequacy challenges persist, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. Productivity improvements, reductions in food loss and waste, and the adoption of circular food systems can amplify environmental gains while mitigating cost increases, but their implementation requires safeguards to prevent adverse trade-offs. Labour and equity analyses highlight how transitions might redistribute employment and income, underscoring the need for just transition strategies. Collectively, the studies reveal that bundled interventions combining dietary shifts, productivity growth, food loss and waste reduction, and mitigation policies produce the largest synergistic benefits across environmental and health outcomes. Future modelling must deepen integration of justice, political economy, and behavioural change dynamics and enhance regional specificity to inform feasible and equitable transformation pathways at policy-relevant scales. Together with more robust stakeholder processes, these priorities define a forward-looking agenda for food systems research capable of guiding sustainable, inclusive, and resilient transformations within planetary boundaries.
粮食系统是人类健康、生计和环境可持续性的基础;然而,它们仍然是造成气候变化、生物多样性丧失和不平等的主要因素。在2025年EAT-Lancet委员会关于健康、可持续和公正的粮食系统的基础上,《柳叶刀-行星健康》上的一组特别论文突出了研究和建模的新兴前沿。在所有模式中,饮食变化仍然是减少温室气体排放和粮食生产带来的土地使用压力的最有效杠杆,尽管在低收入和中等收入国家,可负担性和营养充足性方面的挑战依然存在。提高生产力、减少粮食损失和浪费以及采用循环粮食系统可以在减少成本增加的同时扩大环境收益,但实施这些措施需要保障措施,以防止不利的权衡。劳动力和公平分析强调了转型如何可能重新分配就业和收入,强调了公正的转型战略的必要性。总的来说,这些研究表明,结合饮食转变、生产力增长、粮食损失和减少浪费以及缓解政策的捆绑干预措施,可在环境和健康结果方面产生最大的协同效益。未来的建模必须深化司法、政治经济学和行为变化动态的整合,并增强区域特殊性,以便在政策相关的尺度上为可行和公平的转型途径提供信息。这些优先事项与更强有力的利益相关者流程一起,确定了粮食系统研究的前瞻性议程,能够指导全球范围内的可持续、包容和有弹性的转型。
{"title":"Advances and future needs for modelling sustainable and just food systems transformations","authors":"Daniel Mason-D’Croz MA ,&nbsp;Prof Mario Herrero PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101385","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101385","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food systems underpin human health, livelihoods, and environmental sustainability; yet, they remain major contributors to climate change, biodiversity loss, and inequity. Building on the 2025 EAT–<em>Lancet</em> Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food systems, a special collection of papers in <em>The Lancet Planetary Health</em> highlights emerging frontiers for research and modelling. Across models, dietary change remains the most effective lever for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and land-use pressure from food production, although affordability and nutritional adequacy challenges persist, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. Productivity improvements, reductions in food loss and waste, and the adoption of circular food systems can amplify environmental gains while mitigating cost increases, but their implementation requires safeguards to prevent adverse trade-offs. Labour and equity analyses highlight how transitions might redistribute employment and income, underscoring the need for just transition strategies. Collectively, the studies reveal that bundled interventions combining dietary shifts, productivity growth, food loss and waste reduction, and mitigation policies produce the largest synergistic benefits across environmental and health outcomes. Future modelling must deepen integration of justice, political economy, and behavioural change dynamics and enhance regional specificity to inform feasible and equitable transformation pathways at policy-relevant scales. Together with more robust stakeholder processes, these priorities define a forward-looking agenda for food systems research capable of guiding sustainable, inclusive, and resilient transformations within planetary boundaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 11","pages":"Article 101385"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145472195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dietary schooling 饮食教育。
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101410
The Lancet Planetary Health
{"title":"Dietary schooling","authors":"The Lancet Planetary Health","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101410","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101410","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 11","pages":"Article 101410"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interpreting substitution models in nutritional epidemiology: the case for the protective role of NOVA 1 foods over the risk of NOVA 4 解释营养流行病学中的替代模型:NOVA 1食品对NOVA 4风险的保护作用。
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101332
Nathalie Kliemann , Marc J Gunter , Christopher J Millett , Inge Huybrechts
{"title":"Interpreting substitution models in nutritional epidemiology: the case for the protective role of NOVA 1 foods over the risk of NOVA 4","authors":"Nathalie Kliemann ,&nbsp;Marc J Gunter ,&nbsp;Christopher J Millett ,&nbsp;Inge Huybrechts","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101332","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101332","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 11","pages":"Article 101332"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145226159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Energy security as a crucial component of health infrastructure: global evidence and actions 能源安全作为卫生基础设施的重要组成部分:全球证据和行动。
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101329
Energy security, defined as the availability of reliable, clean, and sustainable energy necessary to ensure the continuous operation of health-care facilities, is essential for delivering safe and effective health care. Yet, it is rarely measured, financed, or governed as a component of core health infrastructure. Evidence from nearly a thousand hospitals shows that power outages were common, especially in lower-income settings, disrupting surgery, diagnostics, cold chains, and digital records, with reports of direct patient harm and environmental costs. This Viewpoint highlights four potential solutions. First, measure energy security with a simple, service-oriented indicator set that tracks outage frequency and duration, clinical disruption, and harm. Second, ensure a minimum energy service for essential care, including operating theatres, maternity services, intensive care units, oxygen, and vaccine cold chains, by protecting critical circuits and embedding these standards in national health plans and SDG7 strategies. Third, build clean resilience by shifting from diesel-only back-up to context-appropriate onsite renewables with storage, integrated with stable grids and smart switching. Fourth, ensure financing by ring-fencing both capital and maintenance budgets, using asset registers, uptime targets, performance-based service contracts, and local technical capacity for operation and repair. These strategic actions would enable clinical teams globally, especially in the Global South, to consistently deliver safe and effective care while simultaneously decarbonising health systems and communities.
能源安全的定义是提供可靠、清洁和可持续的能源,以确保卫生保健设施的持续运作,这对于提供安全有效的卫生保健至关重要。然而,很少将其作为核心卫生基础设施的一个组成部分加以衡量、资助或管理。来自近千家医院的证据表明,停电很常见,特别是在低收入地区,停电中断了手术、诊断、冷链和数字记录,并有报告称对患者造成了直接伤害,并造成了环境成本。这个观点强调了四种可能的解决方案。首先,通过一个简单的、面向服务的指标集来衡量能源安全,该指标集可以跟踪停电频率和持续时间、临床中断和危害。第二,通过保护关键电路并将这些标准纳入国家卫生计划和可持续发展七国目标战略,确保为基本护理提供最低限度的能源服务,包括手术室、产科服务、重症监护病房、氧气和疫苗冷链。第三,通过从纯柴油备用转向适合环境的现场可再生能源,并与稳定的电网和智能开关相结合,建立清洁弹性。第四,通过资产登记、正常运行时间目标、基于绩效的服务合同以及当地运营和维修技术能力,对资本和维护预算进行隔离,确保融资。这些战略行动将使全球,特别是全球南方的临床团队能够持续提供安全有效的护理,同时使卫生系统和社区脱碳。
{"title":"Energy security as a crucial component of health infrastructure: global evidence and actions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101329","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101329","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy security, defined as the availability of reliable, clean, and sustainable energy necessary to ensure the continuous operation of health-care facilities, is essential for delivering safe and effective health care. Yet, it is rarely measured, financed, or governed as a component of core health infrastructure. Evidence from nearly a thousand hospitals shows that power outages were common, especially in lower-income settings, disrupting surgery, diagnostics, cold chains, and digital records, with reports of direct patient harm and environmental costs. This Viewpoint highlights four potential solutions. First, measure energy security with a simple, service-oriented indicator set that tracks outage frequency and duration, clinical disruption, and harm. Second, ensure a minimum energy service for essential care, including operating theatres, maternity services, intensive care units, oxygen, and vaccine cold chains, by protecting critical circuits and embedding these standards in national health plans and SDG7 strategies. Third, build clean resilience by shifting from diesel-only back-up to context-appropriate onsite renewables with storage, integrated with stable grids and smart switching. Fourth, ensure financing by ring-fencing both capital and maintenance budgets, using asset registers, uptime targets, performance-based service contracts, and local technical capacity for operation and repair. These strategic actions would enable clinical teams globally, especially in the Global South, to consistently deliver safe and effective care while simultaneously decarbonising health systems and communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 11","pages":"Article 101329"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating environmental sustainability in clinical counselling: a randomised, double-blind, experimental vignette study in the Netherlands 将环境可持续性纳入临床咨询:荷兰的一项随机、双盲、实验研究。
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101328
Egid M van Bree MD , Laurens C van Gestel PhD , Eva H Visser MD , Jiska J Aardoom PhD , Evelyn A Brakema PhD , Prof Marieke A Adriaanse PhD

Background

Integrating environmental sustainability in health-care decision making might be a key strategy to achieve greener clinical practice. We aim to explore whether advising environmentally sustainable treatment options with or without explicitly mentioning sustainability as an argument in clinical counselling affects patients’ trust in care, compared with less sustainable standard treatment options, while accounting for differences in severity and types of medical problems.

Methods

This randomised, double-blind, experimental vignette study was conducted at the Leiden University Medical Center (Leiden, Netherlands). We recruited a representative sample (based on sex, age, education level, and geographical distribution) of the general Dutch adult population. Participants were masked, randomised, and allocated to one of the eight study groups (four types of advice × two levels of severity) using automatic online software. We used an online survey tool to provide participants with five short descriptions (vignettes) of hypothetical patient–physician interactions based on their allocation to high severity or low severity scenarios and their physician’s type of advice; varying in the level of environmental sustainability and whether sustainability is mentioned explicitly. Low severity scenarios described a general practice setting and high severity scenarios described a hospital setting where the patient had been referred. The primary outcome was a practice-based composite score labelled as trust in care (seven-point Likert scale from 1 [strongly disagree] to 7 [strongly agree]).

Findings

Between May 16 and 31, 2024, 2694 participants were invited to participate, of whom 1536 were included in the final sample size of the study. The mean age of participants was 51·7 years (SD 17·1). 762 (50%) participants were female and 774 (50%) were male. Participants receiving the Less Sustainable advice (mean 5·6 [SD 1·2]) generally had higher trust scores than participants receiving one of the other three types of advice (p<0·0001). Participants receiving the Sustainable made Explicit advice (mean 4·8 [1·6]) generally had lower trust scores than those receiving one of the other three types of advice (p<0·0001). Post-hoc analysis indicated that differences in trust scores were primarily driven by high severity conditions and varied across medical problems.

Interpretation

Advising more sustainable treatment options for low severity scenarios generally does not affect patients’ trust in care, including when sustainability is mentioned explicitly. For high severity scenarios, advising more sustainable treatment options might negatively affect patients’ trust; however, the size and presence of the observed effect varied across medical problems.

Funding

Leiden University.
背景:将环境可持续性纳入医疗保健决策可能是实现绿色临床实践的关键策略。我们的目的是探讨与不太可持续的标准治疗方案相比,在考虑严重程度和医疗问题类型差异的同时,在临床咨询中明确提及可持续性作为论点的情况下,建议环境可持续的治疗方案是否会影响患者对护理的信任。方法:这项随机、双盲、实验性小样本研究在莱顿大学医学中心(莱顿,荷兰)进行。我们招募了一个代表性的样本(基于性别、年龄、教育水平和地理分布)的一般荷兰成年人。参与者被蒙面、随机分配,并使用自动在线软件分配到八个研究组(四种类型的建议×两种严重程度)中的一个。我们使用在线调查工具为参与者提供五个简短的描述(小插曲),假设患者与医生的互动是基于他们被分配到高严重程度或低严重程度的场景和他们的医生的建议类型;环境可持续性水平不同,是否明确提及可持续性。低严重程度情景描述了一般实践环境,高严重程度情景描述了患者转诊的医院环境。主要结果是基于实践的综合评分,标记为对护理的信任(7分李克特量表从1[强烈不同意]到7[强烈同意])。研究结果:在2024年5月16日至31日期间,2694名参与者被邀请参加,其中1536人被纳入研究的最终样本量。参与者的平均年龄为51.7岁(SD 17.1)。762名(50%)参与者为女性,774名(50%)参与者为男性。接受较少可持续性建议(平均值为5.6[标准差为1.2])的参与者通常比接受其他三种类型建议之一的参与者具有更高的信任得分(解释:为低严重情况提供更可持续的治疗方案通常不会影响患者对护理的信任,包括明确提到可持续性的情况。对于严重程度较高的情况,建议更可持续的治疗方案可能会对患者的信任产生负面影响;然而,观察到的影响的大小和存在因医学问题而异。资助:莱顿大学。
{"title":"Integrating environmental sustainability in clinical counselling: a randomised, double-blind, experimental vignette study in the Netherlands","authors":"Egid M van Bree MD ,&nbsp;Laurens C van Gestel PhD ,&nbsp;Eva H Visser MD ,&nbsp;Jiska J Aardoom PhD ,&nbsp;Evelyn A Brakema PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Marieke A Adriaanse PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101328","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101328","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Integrating environmental sustainability in health-care decision making might be a key strategy to achieve greener clinical practice. We aim to explore whether advising environmentally sustainable treatment options with or without explicitly mentioning sustainability as an argument in clinical counselling affects patients’ trust in care, compared with less sustainable standard treatment options, while accounting for differences in severity and types of medical problems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This randomised, double-blind, experimental vignette study was conducted at the Leiden University Medical Center (Leiden, Netherlands). We recruited a representative sample (based on sex, age, education level, and geographical distribution) of the general Dutch adult population. Participants were masked, randomised, and allocated to one of the eight study groups (four types of advice × two levels of severity) using automatic online software. We used an online survey tool to provide participants with five short descriptions (vignettes) of hypothetical patient–physician interactions based on their allocation to high severity or low severity scenarios and their physician’s type of advice; varying in the level of environmental sustainability and whether sustainability is mentioned explicitly. Low severity scenarios described a general practice setting and high severity scenarios described a hospital setting where the patient had been referred. The primary outcome was a practice-based composite score labelled as trust in care (seven-point Likert scale from 1 [strongly disagree] to 7 [strongly agree]).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between May 16 and 31, 2024, 2694 participants were invited to participate, of whom 1536 were included in the final sample size of the study. The mean age of participants was 51·7 years (SD 17·1). 762 (50%) participants were female and 774 (50%) were male. Participants receiving the Less Sustainable advice (mean 5·6 [SD 1·2]) generally had higher trust scores than participants receiving one of the other three types of advice (p&lt;0·0001). Participants receiving the Sustainable made Explicit advice (mean 4·8 [1·6]) generally had lower trust scores than those receiving one of the other three types of advice (p&lt;0·0001). Post-hoc analysis indicated that differences in trust scores were primarily driven by high severity conditions and varied across medical problems.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Advising more sustainable treatment options for low severity scenarios generally does not affect patients’ trust in care, including when sustainability is mentioned explicitly. For high severity scenarios, advising more sustainable treatment options might negatively affect patients’ trust; however, the size and presence of the observed effect varied across medical problems.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Leiden University.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 11","pages":"Article 101328"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145641386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Building climate resilience in health systems: a climate vulnerability and capacity assessment in a rural hospital in Chad 在卫生系统中建立气候适应能力:乍得一家农村医院的气候脆弱性和能力评估
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101354
Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle , Didier Tokoumnogo Zidouemba , Alexi Reouhiri Dermbaye , Kiran Jobanputra , Melissa Mcrae , Melanie Tarabbo , Mohamed Njouonkou , Marius Madjissem , Alexandre Robert , Zia Haider

Background

Chad is highly vulnerable to climate change, with rising temperatures, irregular rainfall, droughts, and resource scarcity driving food insecurity, malnutrition, and vector-borne diseases. In Ngouri, in the Lac Region, these climate stressors have led to worsening health outcomes and strained health-care services. Without adaptation measures, facilities will struggle to sustain essential services. In this case study, we present a facility-adapted climate vulnerability and capacity assessment (VCA) for a rural hospital, identifying key risks and prioritising solutions for climate resilience.

Methods

This study used a participatory mixed-methods design including a literature review on climate hazards and vulnerabilities; facility audit of infrastructure and service delivery gaps; focus groups to refine risk identification; solution-matrix development with costs and feasibility analysis; and participatory prioritisation to produce a multiyear improvement plan.

Findings

The VCA identified elevated malarial mortality and power outages disrupting oxygen supply as key risks. 35 solutions were generated, with 22 priority actions selected for implementation, including anticipatory planning, community sensitisation, supplementary feeding programmes, and improved waste management. The process highlighted the importance of community engagement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and staff motivation for climate-resilient and sustainable health care.

Interpretation

The adapted VCA offers a replicable approach to assess climate-related vulnerabilities and capacities in health-care facilities. The approach used in Ngouri hospital informed feasible adaptation measures and showed relevance for similar contexts, supporting health system resilience and alignment with global sustainability goals.

Funding

None.
乍得极易受到气候变化的影响,气温上升、降雨不规律、干旱和资源短缺导致粮食不安全、营养不良和病媒传播疾病。在拉克区域的恩古里,这些气候压力因素导致健康结果恶化和保健服务紧张。如果没有适应措施,设施将难以维持基本服务。在本案例研究中,我们为一家农村医院提供了一种适应设施的气候脆弱性和能力评估(VCA),确定了关键风险并对气候适应能力的解决方案进行了优先排序。方法采用参与式混合方法设计,包括对气候危害和脆弱性的文献综述;对基础设施和服务提供差距进行设施审计;焦点小组改进风险识别;解决方案矩阵开发与成本和可行性分析;以及参与性的优先次序,以制定一项多年改善计划。VCA确定疟疾死亡率升高和电力中断是主要风险。产生了35种解决办法,选择了22项优先行动加以实施,包括预期规划、社区宣传、补充喂养方案和改进废物管理。该进程强调了社区参与、多学科协作和工作人员积极性对气候适应型和可持续卫生保健的重要性。修订后的VCA提供了一种可复制的方法来评估卫生保健设施中与气候相关的脆弱性和能力。恩古里医院采用的方法为可行的适应措施提供了信息,并显示出与类似情况的相关性,支持卫生系统的复原力并与全球可持续性目标保持一致。
{"title":"Building climate resilience in health systems: a climate vulnerability and capacity assessment in a rural hospital in Chad","authors":"Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle ,&nbsp;Didier Tokoumnogo Zidouemba ,&nbsp;Alexi Reouhiri Dermbaye ,&nbsp;Kiran Jobanputra ,&nbsp;Melissa Mcrae ,&nbsp;Melanie Tarabbo ,&nbsp;Mohamed Njouonkou ,&nbsp;Marius Madjissem ,&nbsp;Alexandre Robert ,&nbsp;Zia Haider","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101354","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101354","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chad is highly vulnerable to climate change, with rising temperatures, irregular rainfall, droughts, and resource scarcity driving food insecurity, malnutrition, and vector-borne diseases. In Ngouri, in the Lac Region, these climate stressors have led to worsening health outcomes and strained health-care services. Without adaptation measures, facilities will struggle to sustain essential services. In this case study, we present a facility-adapted climate vulnerability and capacity assessment (VCA) for a rural hospital, identifying key risks and prioritising solutions for climate resilience.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used a participatory mixed-methods design including a literature review on climate hazards and vulnerabilities; facility audit of infrastructure and service delivery gaps; focus groups to refine risk identification; solution-matrix development with costs and feasibility analysis; and participatory prioritisation to produce a multiyear improvement plan.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The VCA identified elevated malarial mortality and power outages disrupting oxygen supply as key risks. 35 solutions were generated, with 22 priority actions selected for implementation, including anticipatory planning, community sensitisation, supplementary feeding programmes, and improved waste management. The process highlighted the importance of community engagement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and staff motivation for climate-resilient and sustainable health care.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The adapted VCA offers a replicable approach to assess climate-related vulnerabilities and capacities in health-care facilities. The approach used in Ngouri hospital informed feasible adaptation measures and showed relevance for similar contexts, supporting health system resilience and alignment with global sustainability goals.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>None.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 101354"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Local bodies, global goals: The frontline health workforce as agents of planetary health in India’s tribal regions 地方机构,全球目标:作为印度部落地区全球卫生代理人的一线卫生工作人员
IF 21.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101357
Sonal Mobar Roy

Background

Planetary health, which emphasises the interconnection between human health and environmental systems, requires localised, culturally sensitive, and gender-responsive strategies for effective implementation. In the tribal regions of Telangana, the frontline health workforce—comprising Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), (Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs), and Anganwadi Workers (AWWs)—serves as the crucial interface between state-led nutrition programmes, such as Poshan Abhiyan, and indigenous communities. This study examined how these women negotiate their roles within the sociocultural landscape of tribal areas to implement nutrition and health interventions that are ecologically and socially grounded.

Methods

Qualitative methods, including semistructured interviews, field observations, and participatory rural appraisal tools across six tribal-dominated blocks, were used to understand the lived experiences of these frontline workers and the communities they serve.

Findings

These workers act as cultural mediators who adapt state mandates to local contexts—promoting indigenous food knowledge, initiating community-based nutrigardens, and creating awareness around maternal and child health through participatory tools. Their work strengthens community engagement, promotes food diversity, and fosters ecologically aligned dietary practices. However, they face systemic barriers such as irregular incentives, poor training in environmental health, and gendered undervaluation of their labour.

Interpretation

Recognising and investing in the agency of female frontline workers is essential not only for the success of the Poshan Abhiyan but also for advancing planetary health in culturally diverse and ecologically sensitive regions. The efforts of these frontline workers exemplify how gendered grassroots labour is central to sustainable health futures.

Funding

None.
地球卫生强调人类健康与环境系统之间的相互联系,需要本地化、文化敏感和促进性别平等的战略才能有效实施。在特伦甘纳邦的部落地区,一线卫生工作者——包括经认证的社会卫生活动家(ASHAs)、辅助护士助产士(ANMs)和安甘瓦迪工人(aww)——是国家主导的营养项目(如Poshan Abhiyan)与土著社区之间的关键接口。这项研究考察了这些妇女如何在部落地区的社会文化格局中发挥她们的作用,以实施基于生态和社会的营养和保健干预措施。方法采用定性方法,包括半结构化访谈、实地观察和参与式农村评估工具,跨越六个部落主导的街区,了解这些一线工作者及其服务社区的生活经历。这些工作人员扮演文化调解人的角色,使国家的规定适应当地的情况,促进土著食物知识,发起以社区为基础的营养花园,并通过参与性工具提高对妇幼健康的认识。他们的工作加强了社区参与,促进了食物多样性,并促进了符合生态的饮食习惯。然而,她们面临着系统性障碍,例如不定期的奖励、环境卫生方面的培训不足,以及对她们劳动的性别低估。认识到女性一线工作者的作用并对其进行投资,不仅对Poshan Abhiyan的成功至关重要,而且对促进文化多样性和生态敏感地区的地球健康也至关重要。这些一线工作者的努力表明,性别平等的基层劳动力对可持续健康的未来至关重要。
{"title":"Local bodies, global goals: The frontline health workforce as agents of planetary health in India’s tribal regions","authors":"Sonal Mobar Roy","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101357","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101357","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Planetary health, which emphasises the interconnection between human health and environmental systems, requires localised, culturally sensitive, and gender-responsive strategies for effective implementation. In the tribal regions of Telangana, the frontline health workforce—comprising Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), (Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs), and Anganwadi Workers (AWWs)—serves as the crucial interface between state-led nutrition programmes, such as Poshan Abhiyan, and indigenous communities. This study examined how these women negotiate their roles within the sociocultural landscape of tribal areas to implement nutrition and health interventions that are ecologically and socially grounded.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Qualitative methods, including semistructured interviews, field observations, and participatory rural appraisal tools across six tribal-dominated blocks, were used to understand the lived experiences of these frontline workers and the communities they serve.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>These workers act as cultural mediators who adapt state mandates to local contexts—promoting indigenous food knowledge, initiating community-based nutrigardens, and creating awareness around maternal and child health through participatory tools. Their work strengthens community engagement, promotes food diversity, and fosters ecologically aligned dietary practices. However, they face systemic barriers such as irregular incentives, poor training in environmental health, and gendered undervaluation of their labour.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Recognising and investing in the agency of female frontline workers is essential not only for the success of the Poshan Abhiyan but also for advancing planetary health in culturally diverse and ecologically sensitive regions. The efforts of these frontline workers exemplify how gendered grassroots labour is central to sustainable health futures.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>None.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 101357"},"PeriodicalIF":21.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Planetary Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1