首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Psychosomatic Research最新文献

英文 中文
Preoperative sleep quality and anxiety as predictors of postoperative pain and recovery in Gynecologic oncology surgery: A prospective observational study 术前睡眠质量和焦虑作为妇科肿瘤手术术后疼痛和恢复的预测因素:一项前瞻性观察研究
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112496
Celal Akdemir , Suna Aşkın Turan , Mücahit Furkan Balcı , Süleyman Özen , Nefise Şeker , Denizhan Bayramoğlu , Zeynep Bayramoğlu , Muzaffer Sancı

Purpose

This study evaluated associations between preoperative sleep quality, anxiety, and short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery.

Methods

This prospective observational study included 72 women undergoing open gynecologic cancer surgery. Preoperative sleep quality and anxiety were assessed 24–48 h before surgery using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Postoperative pain was measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. Complications, rescue analgesia use, and length of stay were recorded.

Results

Poor sleep quality (%31.9) and clinically significant anxiety (%19.4) were both associated with higher mean postoperative pain scores (PSQI ≥5: 6.3 ± 1.2 vs 5.1 ± 1.3, p = 0.002; BAI ≥16: 6.5 ± 1.1 vs 5.2 ± 1.4, p = 0.001). In adjusted analyses, higher PSQI (β = 0.112, 95 % CI 0.039–0.185, p = 0.003) and higher BAI scores (β = 0.044, 95 % CI 0.023–0.065, p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with increased mean pain. Poor sleep quality was also linked to longer hospitalization (4 vs 3 days, p < 0.001) and higher complication rates (%52.2 vs %12.2, p < 0.001). Elevated anxiety was similarly associated with higher complication rates (%57.1 vs %17.2, p = 0.004) and more frequent rescue analgesia use (%64.3 vs %29.3, p = 0.014).

Conclusion

Preoperative sleep disturbances and anxiety are significantly associated with worse postoperative pain, higher complication rates, and prolonged recovery; routine screening and targeted interventions may therefore improve surgical outcomes.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT07036549) on June 24, 2025.
目的:本研究评估妇科肿瘤手术患者术前睡眠质量、焦虑和术后短期预后之间的关系。方法本前瞻性观察研究纳入72例接受开放性妇科肿瘤手术的妇女。术前24-48 h采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和贝克焦虑量表(BAI)评估睡眠质量和焦虑。术后0、4、8、12和24 h采用数值评定量表(NRS)测量疼痛。记录并发症、抢救镇痛使用情况和住院时间。结果spoor睡眠质量(%31.9)和临床显著焦虑(%19.4)均与较高的术后平均疼痛评分相关(PSQI≥5:6.3±1.2 vs 5.1±1.3,p = 0.002; BAI≥16:6.5±1.1 vs 5.2±1.4,p = 0.001)。在校正分析中,较高的PSQI (β = 0.112, 95% CI 0.039-0.185, p = 0.003)和较高的BAI评分(β = 0.044, 95% CI 0.023-0.065, p < 0.001)仍然与平均疼痛增加显著相关。睡眠质量差还与住院时间较长(4天对3天,p < 0.001)和并发症发生率较高(% 52.2%对% 12.2%,p < 0.001)有关。焦虑升高同样与更高的并发症发生率(%57.1 vs %17.2, p = 0.004)和更频繁的急救镇痛使用相关(%64.3 vs %29.3, p = 0.014)。结论术前睡眠障碍和焦虑与术后疼痛加重、并发症发生率高、恢复时间长有显著关系;因此,常规筛查和有针对性的干预可以改善手术结果。试验注册该研究于2025年6月24日在ClinicalTrials.gov(标识符:NCT07036549)上回顾性注册。
{"title":"Preoperative sleep quality and anxiety as predictors of postoperative pain and recovery in Gynecologic oncology surgery: A prospective observational study","authors":"Celal Akdemir ,&nbsp;Suna Aşkın Turan ,&nbsp;Mücahit Furkan Balcı ,&nbsp;Süleyman Özen ,&nbsp;Nefise Şeker ,&nbsp;Denizhan Bayramoğlu ,&nbsp;Zeynep Bayramoğlu ,&nbsp;Muzaffer Sancı","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112496","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112496","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study evaluated associations between preoperative sleep quality, anxiety, and short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective observational study included 72 women undergoing open gynecologic cancer surgery. Preoperative sleep quality and anxiety were assessed 24–48 h before surgery using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Postoperative pain was measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. Complications, rescue analgesia use, and length of stay were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Poor sleep quality (%31.9) and clinically significant anxiety (%19.4) were both associated with higher mean postoperative pain scores (PSQI ≥5: 6.3 ± 1.2 vs 5.1 ± 1.3, <em>p</em> = 0.002; BAI ≥16: 6.5 ± 1.1 vs 5.2 ± 1.4, <em>p</em> = 0.001). In adjusted analyses, higher PSQI (β = 0.112, 95 % CI 0.039–0.185, <em>p</em> = 0.003) and higher BAI scores (β = 0.044, 95 % CI 0.023–0.065, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) remained significantly associated with increased mean pain. Poor sleep quality was also linked to longer hospitalization (4 vs 3 days, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and higher complication rates (%52.2 vs %12.2, p &lt; 0.001). Elevated anxiety was similarly associated with higher complication rates (%57.1 vs %17.2, <em>p</em> = 0.004) and more frequent rescue analgesia use (%64.3 vs %29.3, <em>p</em> = 0.014).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative sleep disturbances and anxiety are significantly associated with worse postoperative pain, higher complication rates, and prolonged recovery; routine screening and targeted interventions may therefore improve surgical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>The study was retrospectively registered at <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (Identifier: <span><span>NCT07036549</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) on June 24, 2025.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 112496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145748514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of self-reported sensitivities to various environmental factors in Germany, Sweden, and Finland based on multiple classification criteria 基于多重分类标准的德国、瑞典和芬兰对各种环境因素自我报告敏感性的流行程度
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112495
Ferenc Köteles , Michael Witthöft , Anne-Kathrin Bräscher , Josef Bailer , Steven Nordin

Objective

Our knowledge on the prevalence of self-reported sensitivities to environmental factors is poor. The lack of accepted criteria/assessment makes findings of different studies difficult to compare; the way of assessment might play a role in the reported prevalence rates. The present study aimed to report the prevalence rates of five environmental sensitivities for the German general population, to compare three of them with Swedish and Finnish data, and to demonstrate the impact of strictness of criterion on the results.

Methods

Data from a German (n = 2515), a Swedish (n = 3253) and a Finnish (n = 1467) population-based survey was used. Sentitivities were rated on ordinal scales in all samples.

Results

In the German sample, about 25 % of participants reported mild reactions to sounds, chemicals, and buildings, and about 10 % to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and wind turbines, with a similar pattern for strong reactions, but with proportions of 1–2 %. Data from the Nordic countries show consistent similarities between these two countries, with prevalences exceeding 34 % for mild reactions to chemicals and sounds and about 5 % to EMFs, with a similar pattern for strong reactions, but with proportions of 1–8 %. Prevalence of sensitivity to EMFs was higher, whereas prevalence of sensitivity to chemicals and sounds was lower in Germany. Classification criteria significantly impacted the reported prevalence rates.

Conclusion

Various environmental sensitivities affect a considerable proportion of the general populations of the three countries. To improve comparability, self-report assessment of sensitivities should be based on at least an ordinal scale instead of the widely used yes-or-no question.
目的:我们对自我报告的环境因素敏感性的患病率了解甚少。缺乏公认的标准/评估使得不同研究的结果难以比较;评估方法可能在报告的患病率中发挥作用。本研究旨在报告德国一般人口中五种环境敏感性的流行率,将其中三种与瑞典和芬兰的数据进行比较,并证明标准的严格程度对结果的影响。方法:采用来自德国(n = 2515)、瑞典(n = 3253)和芬兰(n = 1467)人群调查的数据。对所有样本的敏感性按顺序进行评分。结果:在德国的样本中,大约25%的参与者报告对声音、化学物质和建筑物有轻微反应,大约10%的参与者对电磁场(emf)和风力涡轮机有轻微反应,强烈反应的模式类似,但比例为1- 2%。来自北欧国家的数据显示,这两个国家之间存在一致的相似性,对化学品和声音的轻度反应的患病率超过34%,对电磁场的患病率约为5%,强烈反应的患病率也类似,但比例为1- 8%。在德国,对电磁辐射敏感的患病率较高,而对化学物质和声音敏感的患病率较低。分类标准显著影响报告的患病率。结论:各种环境敏感性影响了这三个国家相当大比例的普通人群。为了提高可比性,敏感性的自我报告评估应该至少基于一个顺序量表,而不是广泛使用的是或否问题。
{"title":"Prevalence of self-reported sensitivities to various environmental factors in Germany, Sweden, and Finland based on multiple classification criteria","authors":"Ferenc Köteles ,&nbsp;Michael Witthöft ,&nbsp;Anne-Kathrin Bräscher ,&nbsp;Josef Bailer ,&nbsp;Steven Nordin","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112495","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112495","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our knowledge on the prevalence of self-reported sensitivities to environmental factors is poor. The lack of accepted criteria/assessment makes findings of different studies difficult to compare; the way of assessment might play a role in the reported prevalence rates. The present study aimed to report the prevalence rates of five environmental sensitivities for the German general population, to compare three of them with Swedish and Finnish data, and to demonstrate the impact of strictness of criterion on the results.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from a German (<em>n</em> = 2515), a Swedish (<em>n</em> = 3253) and a Finnish (<em>n</em> = 1467) population-based survey was used. Sentitivities were rated on ordinal scales in all samples.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the German sample, about 25 % of participants reported mild reactions to sounds, chemicals, and buildings, and about 10 % to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and wind turbines, with a similar pattern for strong reactions, but with proportions of 1–2 %. Data from the Nordic countries show consistent similarities between these two countries, with prevalences exceeding 34 % for mild reactions to chemicals and sounds and about 5 % to EMFs, with a similar pattern for strong reactions, but with proportions of 1–8 %. Prevalence of sensitivity to EMFs was higher, whereas prevalence of sensitivity to chemicals and sounds was lower in Germany. Classification criteria significantly impacted the reported prevalence rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Various environmental sensitivities affect a considerable proportion of the general populations of the three countries. To improve comparability, self-report assessment of sensitivities should be based on at least an ordinal scale instead of the widely used yes-or-no question.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 112495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to ‘Machine learning–based prediction of delirium in older patients with chronic kidney disease requiring intensive care: A hospital-based retrospective cohort study’ [Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 200 (2026), article PSR_112454] “基于机器学习预测需要重症监护的老年慢性肾病患者谵妄:一项基于医院的回顾性队列研究”的更正[Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 200(2026),文章PSR_112454]。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112494
Chia-Rung Wu , Yung-Chun Chang , Victoria Traynor , Shu-Tai Shen Hsiao , Shu-Liu Guo , Shu-Chuan Lin , Sen-Kuang Hou , Hsiao-Yean Chiu
{"title":"Corrigendum to ‘Machine learning–based prediction of delirium in older patients with chronic kidney disease requiring intensive care: A hospital-based retrospective cohort study’ [Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 200 (2026), article PSR_112454]","authors":"Chia-Rung Wu ,&nbsp;Yung-Chun Chang ,&nbsp;Victoria Traynor ,&nbsp;Shu-Tai Shen Hsiao ,&nbsp;Shu-Liu Guo ,&nbsp;Shu-Chuan Lin ,&nbsp;Sen-Kuang Hou ,&nbsp;Hsiao-Yean Chiu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112494","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112494","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 112494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145716582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Depressed or delirious? Overdiagnosis of depression in medically hospitalized patients 抑郁还是精神错乱?住院患者抑郁症的过度诊断
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112493
Molly Howland , Nicolas Thompson , Arushi Mahajan , Nona Nichols , Marielle Collins , Jack H. Owens Jr , Adele Viguera

Objective

Misdiagnosis of depression and delirium by non-psychiatric clinicians is common. Depression over-diagnosis can cause stigmatization of normal emotional reactions and delays in addressing delirium. We performed a multisite retrospective chart review to examine diagnostic agreement between non-psychiatric services and the consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) service.

Methods

We reviewed inpatient depression and delirium referrals across two Cleveland Clinic sites. Agreement between referral reason and CLP service diagnosis was assessed. We fit multivariable logistic regression models for the dependent variables of depression overdiagnosis and delirium masquerading as depression, with independent variables that included the primary team discipline and demographic and clinical variables.

Results

Diagnostic agreement for delirium, strict depression diagnosis, and broad depression diagnosis were 88 %, 67 %, and 80 %, respectively. Of patients referred for depression who did not receive a CL psychiatry diagnosis of depression, 49 % were diagnosed with adjustment disorder, 18 % with anxiety/OCD, 16 % with delirium, and 4 % with neurocognitive disorders. Older age and prior psychiatric diagnoses decreased the likelihood of depression overdiagnosis. Psychotropic medication use increased the likelihood of delirium misdiagnosed as depression.

Conclusion

Primary services overidentify depression and more accurately identify delirium. However, given that most alternative diagnoses were anxiety disorders or adjustment disorders, primary services seem adept at identifying psychological distress, which may be related to destigmatization and education efforts by psychiatrists. Primary services recognize prior psychiatric diagnoses as a depression risk factor and demonstrate awareness of geriatric presentations. However, prior psychotropic use may introduce bias. Further research, including direct knowledge and attitude assessments, is needed.
目的:非精神科临床医生对抑郁症和谵妄的误诊是常见的。抑郁症的过度诊断会导致对正常情绪反应的污名化和对谵妄治疗的延迟。我们进行了多地点回顾性图表回顾,以检查非精神科服务和咨询联络精神病学(CLP)服务之间的诊断一致性。方法:我们回顾了两个克利夫兰诊所的住院抑郁症和谵妄转诊病例。评估转诊原因与CLP服务诊断的一致性。我们拟合了抑郁症过度诊断和谵妄伪装成抑郁症的因变量的多变量逻辑回归模型,自变量包括主要团队纪律和人口统计学和临床变量。结果:谵妄的诊断符合率为88%,抑郁症的诊断符合率为67%,抑郁症的诊断符合率为80%。在未接受CL精神病学诊断的抑郁症患者中,49%被诊断为适应障碍,18%被诊断为焦虑/强迫症,16%被诊断为谵妄,4%被诊断为神经认知障碍。年龄较大和先前的精神病诊断降低了抑郁症过度诊断的可能性。精神药物的使用增加了谵妄被误诊为抑郁症的可能性。结论:基层医疗机构对抑郁症的鉴别过高,对谵妄的鉴别更准确。然而,考虑到大多数替代诊断是焦虑障碍或适应障碍,初级服务似乎善于识别心理困扰,这可能与精神科医生的去污名化和教育努力有关。初级服务承认先前的精神病诊断是抑郁症的危险因素,并表现出对老年表现的认识。然而,先前的精神药物使用可能会引入偏见。需要进一步的研究,包括直接的知识和态度评估。
{"title":"Depressed or delirious? Overdiagnosis of depression in medically hospitalized patients","authors":"Molly Howland ,&nbsp;Nicolas Thompson ,&nbsp;Arushi Mahajan ,&nbsp;Nona Nichols ,&nbsp;Marielle Collins ,&nbsp;Jack H. Owens Jr ,&nbsp;Adele Viguera","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112493","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112493","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Misdiagnosis of depression and delirium by non-psychiatric clinicians is common. Depression over-diagnosis can cause stigmatization of normal emotional reactions and delays in addressing delirium. We performed a multisite retrospective chart review to examine diagnostic agreement between non-psychiatric services and the consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) service.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reviewed inpatient depression and delirium referrals across two Cleveland Clinic sites. Agreement between referral reason and CLP service diagnosis was assessed. We fit multivariable logistic regression models for the dependent variables of depression overdiagnosis and delirium masquerading as depression, with independent variables that included the primary team discipline and demographic and clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Diagnostic agreement for delirium, strict depression diagnosis, and broad depression diagnosis were 88 %, 67 %, and 80 %, respectively. Of patients referred for depression who did not receive a CL psychiatry diagnosis of depression, 49 % were diagnosed with adjustment disorder, 18 % with anxiety/OCD, 16 % with delirium, and 4 % with neurocognitive disorders. Older age and prior psychiatric diagnoses decreased the likelihood of depression overdiagnosis. Psychotropic medication use increased the likelihood of delirium misdiagnosed as depression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Primary services overidentify depression and more accurately identify delirium. However, given that most alternative diagnoses were anxiety disorders or adjustment disorders, primary services seem adept at identifying psychological distress, which may be related to destigmatization and education efforts by psychiatrists. Primary services recognize prior psychiatric diagnoses as a depression risk factor and demonstrate awareness of geriatric presentations. However, prior psychotropic use may introduce bias. Further research, including direct knowledge and attitude assessments, is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 112493"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145710299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
EAPM 2026 Florence EAPM 2026佛罗伦萨
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3999(25)00450-7
{"title":"EAPM 2026 Florence","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0022-3999(25)00450-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0022-3999(25)00450-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 112486"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145693750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative visual and auditory hallucinations after cardiac surgery: VAACS umbrella study 心脏手术后的视觉和听觉幻觉:VAACS研究。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112480
Haitham Abu Khadija , Nizar Abu Hamdeh , Duha Najajra , Wafiq Othman , Hamza A. Abdul-Hafez , Anwar Zahran , Omar Heih , Yahya Z. Fraitekh , Mohammad Masu'd , Mahdi Awwad , Idiberto José Zotarelli Filho , Alaa Zayed , Moaath Sawalha , Sara Ismail , Izzeddin Swidan , Omar Abu-Hamda , Oday Nana , Kasem Hamoudy , Basem Bali , Moaath Nairat , Mohammad Alnees

Background

Hallucinations are underrecognized neuropsychiatric complications after cardiac surgery. Data on incidence and type-specific predictors in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valvular surgery are limited.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study (September 2022 to May 2025) across West Bank cardiac surgery centers. A total of 1332 adults (997 CABG, 335 valve) were assessed daily for 7 days postoperatively using the Questionnaire for Psychotic Experiences. Predictors of visual and auditory hallucinations evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Visual hallucinations occurred in 11.5 % of CABG patients and 10.0 % of valve surgery patients, while auditory hallucinations were reported in 7.0 % and 5.0 %, respectively. In the CABG group, the multivariable Cox regression models stratified by hospital showed that auditory hallucinations were significantly associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (HR = 1.05 per 1 % decrease; 95 % CI 1.01–1.09), longer aortic cross-clamp time (HR = 1.01 per minute; 95 % CI1.0004–1.02), and immunosuppressive therapy (HR = 4.81; 95 % CI 1.13–20.53). Postoperative blood transfusion was associated with an increased risk of visual hallucinations in univariate analysis (HR = 1.87; 95 % CI 1.05–3.33), but the association became borderline after adjustment (HR = 1.97; 95 % CI 0.95–4.09). Among the valve surgery cohort, the hospital-stratified models indicated that prolonged postoperative ventilation was independently protective against visual hallucinations (adjusted HR = 0.78; 95 % CI 0.68–0.90), whereas noradrenalin use (adjusted HR = 6.07; 95 % CI 2.18–16.93) and immunosuppressive therapy (adjusted HR = 5.13; 95 % CI 1.14–23.09) markedly increased the risk. For auditory hallucinations in valve surgery patients, adrenaline exposure emerged as a significant independent predictor (adjusted HR = 3.40; 95 % CI 1.21–9.54).

Conclusions

Postoperative hallucinations affected ∼1 in 10 patients; visual hallucinations were more frequent, auditory hallucinations linked to stress and medications, with risks varying by surgery type, supporting tailored monitoring and prevention.
背景:幻觉是心脏手术后未被充分认识的神经精神并发症。关于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和瓣膜手术的发生率和类型特异性预测因素的数据有限。方法:我们在西岸心脏外科中心进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究(2022年9月至2025年5月)。共有1332名成人(997例冠脉搭桥,335例瓣膜)在术后7天内每天使用精神病经历问卷进行评估。用Cox比例风险模型评估视觉和听觉幻觉的预测因子。结果:冠脉搭桥患者出现视幻觉的比例为11.5%,瓣膜手术患者出现视幻觉的比例为10.0%,出现听幻觉的比例为7.0%,出现听幻觉的比例为5.0%。在CABG组,医院分层的多变量Cox回归模型显示,幻听与左室射血分数降低(HR = 1.05 / 1%; 95% CI 1.01-1.09)、主动脉交叉夹持时间延长(HR = 1.01 / min; 95% CI1.0004-1.02)和免疫抑制治疗(HR = 4.81; 95% CI 1.13-20.53)显著相关。单因素分析显示,术后输血与视幻觉风险增加相关(HR = 1.87; 95% CI 1.05-3.33),但调整后相关性变为临界(HR = 1.97; 95% CI 0.95-4.09)。在瓣膜手术队列中,医院分层模型显示,术后延长通气对视幻觉有独立的保护作用(调整后的HR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.90),而使用去甲肾上腺素(调整后的HR = 6.07; 95% CI 2.18-16.93)和免疫抑制治疗(调整后的HR = 5.13; 95% CI 1.14-23.09)显著增加了视幻觉的风险。对于瓣膜手术患者的幻听,肾上腺素暴露是一个重要的独立预测因子(调整后HR = 3.40; 95% CI 1.21-9.54)。结论:术后10例患者中有1例出现幻觉;视觉幻觉更频繁,听觉幻觉与压力和药物有关,风险因手术类型而异,支持量身定制的监测和预防。
{"title":"Postoperative visual and auditory hallucinations after cardiac surgery: VAACS umbrella study","authors":"Haitham Abu Khadija ,&nbsp;Nizar Abu Hamdeh ,&nbsp;Duha Najajra ,&nbsp;Wafiq Othman ,&nbsp;Hamza A. Abdul-Hafez ,&nbsp;Anwar Zahran ,&nbsp;Omar Heih ,&nbsp;Yahya Z. Fraitekh ,&nbsp;Mohammad Masu'd ,&nbsp;Mahdi Awwad ,&nbsp;Idiberto José Zotarelli Filho ,&nbsp;Alaa Zayed ,&nbsp;Moaath Sawalha ,&nbsp;Sara Ismail ,&nbsp;Izzeddin Swidan ,&nbsp;Omar Abu-Hamda ,&nbsp;Oday Nana ,&nbsp;Kasem Hamoudy ,&nbsp;Basem Bali ,&nbsp;Moaath Nairat ,&nbsp;Mohammad Alnees","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112480","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112480","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hallucinations are underrecognized neuropsychiatric complications after cardiac surgery. Data on incidence and type-specific predictors in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valvular surgery are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study (September 2022 to May 2025) across West Bank cardiac surgery centers. A total of 1332 adults (997 CABG, 335 valve) were assessed daily for 7 days postoperatively using the Questionnaire for Psychotic Experiences. Predictors of visual and auditory hallucinations evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Visual hallucinations occurred in 11.5 % of CABG patients and 10.0 % of valve surgery patients, while auditory hallucinations were reported in 7.0 % and 5.0 %, respectively. In the CABG group, the multivariable Cox regression models stratified by hospital showed that auditory hallucinations were significantly associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (HR = 1.05 per 1 % decrease; 95 % CI 1.01–1.09), longer aortic cross-clamp time (HR = 1.01 per minute; 95 % CI1.0004–1.02), and immunosuppressive therapy (HR = 4.81; 95 % CI 1.13–20.53). Postoperative blood transfusion was associated with an increased risk of visual hallucinations in univariate analysis (HR = 1.87; 95 % CI 1.05–3.33), but the association became borderline after adjustment (HR = 1.97; 95 % CI 0.95–4.09). Among the valve surgery cohort, the hospital-stratified models indicated that prolonged postoperative ventilation was independently protective against visual hallucinations (adjusted HR = 0.78; 95 % CI 0.68–0.90), whereas noradrenalin use (adjusted HR = 6.07; 95 % CI 2.18–16.93) and immunosuppressive therapy (adjusted HR = 5.13; 95 % CI 1.14–23.09) markedly increased the risk. For auditory hallucinations in valve surgery patients, adrenaline exposure emerged as a significant independent predictor (adjusted HR = 3.40; 95 % CI 1.21–9.54).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Postoperative hallucinations affected ∼1 in 10 patients; visual hallucinations were more frequent, auditory hallucinations linked to stress and medications, with risks varying by surgery type, supporting tailored monitoring and prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 112480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
EAPM 2026 Florence EAPM 2026佛罗伦萨
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3999(25)00425-8
{"title":"EAPM 2026 Florence","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0022-3999(25)00425-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0022-3999(25)00425-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 112461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to “Does insecure attachment affect treatment outcome in young persons with post-concussion symptoms? A secondary analysis of the GAIN trial”. J Psychosom Res. 2023 Jan;164:111100 “不安全依恋是否会影响有脑震荡后症状的年轻人的治疗结果?”GAIN试验的二次分析”。[J]中华心理医学杂志,2009;31(1):391 - 391。
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112428
A. Tuborgh , S.W. Svendsen , A. Elklit , J. Hunter , E. Ornbol , J.S. Jensen , A. Schröder , J.F. Nielsen , E.T. Næss-Schmidt , M.M. Thastum , C.U. Rask

Background

Insecure attachment may negatively affect symptom reporting and disability in physical illness, but research on its influence on treatment outcome is scarce. We explored if insecure attachment: 1) impacted overall treatment outcome, and 2) moderated the effect of an early interdisciplinary intervention in young persons with long-lasting postconcussion symptoms (PCS).

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of the ‘Get going After concussIoN’ (GAIN) trial. Participants aged 15–30 years were randomised to either GAIN or enhanced usual care (EUC). Attachment insecurity (anxiety and avoidance) was measured at baseline with the Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structure Questionnaire, and treatment outcome measured by PCS was recorded by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. The impact of insecure attachment was explored using both a dimensional and a categorical approach. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied.

Results

Ninety-one out of 112 trial participants were included. Neither attachment anxiety nor attachment avoidance independently affected the treatment outcome. However, in a categorical approach, fearful patients (i.e., combined high anxiety and high avoidance) had a less favourable outcome (β = 9.98, 95 % CI: 4.05; 15.92, p = 0.001) than nonfearful patients. Insecure attachment did not moderate the superior effect of GAIN on PCS compared with EUC.

Conclusion

This study provided weak support for an association between insecure attachment and the outcome of an early intervention against long-lasting PCS in young persons after a concussion. However, patients with fearful attachment may represent a more vulnerable subgroup. Further research is needed to explore if attachment-informed intervention may enhance treatment prospects.
背景:不安全依恋可能对躯体疾病的症状报告和残疾产生负面影响,但对其对治疗结果影响的研究较少。我们探讨了不安全依恋是否:1)影响整体治疗结果,2)调节早期跨学科干预对长期脑震荡后症状(PCS)的影响。方法:这是对“脑震荡后恢复”(GAIN)试验的二次分析。15-30岁的参与者被随机分配到GAIN组或强化常规护理组(EUC)。依恋不安全感(焦虑和回避)基线采用亲密关系体验-关系结构问卷测量,治疗结果采用Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷记录。不安全依恋的影响是用维度和分类的方法来探讨的。采用多元线性回归分析。结果:112名试验参与者中有91人入选。依恋焦虑和依恋回避均未独立影响治疗结果。然而,在分类方法中,恐惧患者(即高度焦虑和高度回避的结合)的结果不如无恐惧患者(β = 9.98, 95% CI: 4.05; 15.92, p = 0.001)。与EUC相比,不安全依恋并没有调节GAIN对PCS的优越效果。结论:本研究为不安全依恋与青少年脑震荡后长期PCS的早期干预结果之间的关联提供了微弱的支持。然而,有恐惧依恋的患者可能是一个更脆弱的亚群。需要进一步的研究来探索依恋知情干预是否可以提高治疗前景。
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Does insecure attachment affect treatment outcome in young persons with post-concussion symptoms? A secondary analysis of the GAIN trial”. J Psychosom Res. 2023 Jan;164:111100","authors":"A. Tuborgh ,&nbsp;S.W. Svendsen ,&nbsp;A. Elklit ,&nbsp;J. Hunter ,&nbsp;E. Ornbol ,&nbsp;J.S. Jensen ,&nbsp;A. Schröder ,&nbsp;J.F. Nielsen ,&nbsp;E.T. Næss-Schmidt ,&nbsp;M.M. Thastum ,&nbsp;C.U. Rask","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112428","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112428","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Insecure attachment may negatively affect symptom reporting and disability in physical illness, but research on its influence on treatment outcome is scarce. We explored if insecure attachment: 1) impacted overall treatment outcome, and 2) moderated the effect of an early interdisciplinary intervention in young persons with long-lasting postconcussion symptoms (PCS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a secondary analysis of the ‘Get going After concussIoN’ (GAIN) trial. Participants aged 15–30 years were randomised to either GAIN or enhanced usual care (EUC). Attachment insecurity (anxiety and avoidance) was measured at baseline with the Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structure Questionnaire, and treatment outcome measured by PCS was recorded by the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. The impact of insecure attachment was explored using both a dimensional and a categorical approach. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-one out of 112 trial participants were included. Neither attachment anxiety nor attachment avoidance independently affected the treatment outcome. However, in a categorical approach, fearful patients (i.e., combined high anxiety and high avoidance) had a less favourable outcome (β = 9.98, 95 % CI: 4.05; 15.92, <em>p</em> = 0.001) than nonfearful patients. Insecure attachment did not moderate the superior effect of GAIN on PCS compared with EUC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provided weak support for an association between insecure attachment and the outcome of an early intervention against long-lasting PCS in young persons after a concussion. However, patients with fearful attachment may represent a more vulnerable subgroup. Further research is needed to explore if attachment-informed intervention may enhance treatment prospects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 112428"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145446490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Environmental noise and mental health: Could psychotherapy play a supportive role? 环境噪音与心理健康:心理治疗能起到支持作用吗?
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112446
Omar Hahad , Manfred E. Beutel
{"title":"Environmental noise and mental health: Could psychotherapy play a supportive role?","authors":"Omar Hahad ,&nbsp;Manfred E. Beutel","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112446","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112446","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 112446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145514102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reduced distress tolerance and elevated depression in functional tremor: A comparative cross-sectional observational study of tremor disorders 功能性震颤的痛苦耐受性降低和抑郁升高:震颤障碍的比较横断面观察研究
IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112479
Patrick Sheehan , Yongjia Deng , Holly E. Phelps , Nicholas Jasinski , Kierstan Pyle , Michelle M. Coleman , Danielle Sblendorio , Delanie Talkington , Ann Murray , Adeel A. Memon , Maria C. Moreno-Escobar , Jessica Frey

Background

Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) frequently experience depression and anxiety, while those with Essential Tremor (ET) report anxiety and embarrassment related to their tremor. The emotional burden of functional tremor (FT) is less well understood.

Objective

To examine distress tolerance and related psychological symptoms across tremor subtypes.

Methods

Patients with FT (n = 20), ET (n = 21), and PD (n = 20) completed the Distress Tolerance Scale, Beck's Depression Inventory, and Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), tremor-related disability, and tremor severity were also assessed.

Results

Patients with FT reported significantly higher depression than both PD and ET groups (overall: F(2,54) = 6.85, p = .002; FT vs. PD: p = .005; FT vs. ET: p = .005), and lower distress tolerance than the PD group (F(2,54) = 3.54, p = .036). No significant differences were found between groups in embarrassment, ACEs, nor disability.

Conclusion

This distinct psychological profile in patients with FT highlights the need for integrated biopsychosocial care, and the development of targeted, comprehensive interventions.
Tremor is the most common symptom in movement disorder clinics (Sharma and Pandey, 2016 [1]). Essential Tremor (ET) affects ∼5.8 % of people over 65 (Louis and McCreary, 2021 [2]), while Parkinson's Disease (PD) affects ∼1 % of people over 60 (Tysnes and Storstein, 2017 [3]). Functional tremors (FT), the most common functional movement disorder (FMD), comprise 55 % of FMD diagnoses (Bhatia and Schneider, 2007 [4]).
帕金森氏病(PD)患者经常经历抑郁和焦虑,而原发性震颤(ET)患者则报告与震颤相关的焦虑和尴尬。功能性震颤(FT)的情绪负担尚不清楚。目的探讨不同震颤亚型患者的痛苦耐受性及相关心理症状。方法FT (n = 20)、ET (n = 21)、PD (n = 20)患者分别完成痛苦耐受量表、贝克抑郁量表和特发性震颤困窘评定。不良童年经历(ace)、震颤相关残疾和震颤严重程度也被评估。结果FT患者的抑郁程度明显高于PD组和ET组(总体:F(2,54) = 6.85, p = 0.002;FT vs. PD: p = 0.005;FT组与ET组:p = 0.005),且痛苦耐受力低于PD组(F(2,54) = 3.54, p = 0.036)。在尴尬、ace和残疾方面,两组之间没有发现显著差异。结论:FT患者的这种独特的心理特征强调了综合生物心理社会护理的必要性,以及有针对性的综合干预措施的发展。震颤是运动障碍诊所中最常见的症状(Sharma and Pandey, 2016[1])。特发性震颤(ET)影响约5.8%的65岁以上人群(Louis and McCreary, 2021[3]),而帕金森病(PD)影响约1%的60岁以上人群(Tysnes and Storstein, 2017[3])。功能性震颤(FT)是最常见的功能性运动障碍(FMD),占FMD诊断的55% (Bhatia和Schneider, 2007[4])。
{"title":"Reduced distress tolerance and elevated depression in functional tremor: A comparative cross-sectional observational study of tremor disorders","authors":"Patrick Sheehan ,&nbsp;Yongjia Deng ,&nbsp;Holly E. Phelps ,&nbsp;Nicholas Jasinski ,&nbsp;Kierstan Pyle ,&nbsp;Michelle M. Coleman ,&nbsp;Danielle Sblendorio ,&nbsp;Delanie Talkington ,&nbsp;Ann Murray ,&nbsp;Adeel A. Memon ,&nbsp;Maria C. Moreno-Escobar ,&nbsp;Jessica Frey","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112479","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112479","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) frequently experience depression and anxiety, while those with Essential Tremor (ET) report anxiety and embarrassment related to their tremor. The emotional burden of functional tremor (FT) is less well understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine distress tolerance and related psychological symptoms across tremor subtypes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with FT (<em>n</em> = 20), ET (<em>n</em> = 21), and PD (n = 20) completed the Distress Tolerance Scale, Beck's Depression Inventory, and Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), tremor-related disability, and tremor severity were also assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with FT reported significantly higher depression than both PD and ET groups (overall: F(2,54) = 6.85, <em>p</em> = .002; FT vs. PD: <em>p</em> = .005; FT vs. ET: p = .005), and lower distress tolerance than the PD group (F(2,54) = 3.54, <em>p</em> = .036). No significant differences were found between groups in embarrassment, ACEs, nor disability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This distinct psychological profile in patients with FT highlights the need for integrated biopsychosocial care, and the development of targeted, comprehensive interventions.</div><div>Tremor is the most common symptom in movement disorder clinics (Sharma and Pandey, 2016 [<span><span>1</span></span>]). Essential Tremor (ET) affects ∼5.8 % of people over 65 (Louis and McCreary, 2021 [<span><span>2</span></span>]), while Parkinson's Disease (PD) affects ∼1 % of people over 60 (Tysnes and Storstein, 2017 [<span><span>3</span></span>]). Functional tremors (FT), the most common functional movement disorder (FMD), comprise 55 % of FMD diagnoses (Bhatia and Schneider, 2007 [<span><span>4</span></span>]).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 112479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145625399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1