Purpose: Upper extremity function is crucial for daily living activities. This study aimed to validate the Persian version of the 10-item Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire-Short Form (AMSQ-SF) in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study involving 201 individuals with MS, the AMSQ-SF was evaluated for reliability (test-retest in 50 participants) and construct validity against a battery of established performance-based and patient-reported outcome measures. Spasticity and disability levels were employed to evaluate the questionnaire's ability to differentiate between various subgroups.
Results: The Persian AMSQ-SF demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC(2,1) = 0.94) and internal consistency (α = 0.95). Its strong construct validity was evidenced by correlations in the hypothesized directions with measures of grip strength, quality of life, self-reported function, dexterity, and fatigue. It differentiated patients with and without spasticity and various disability levels (p < 0.001). Clinically useful cutoff scores were established to classify impairment severity (mild ≥16, moderate ≥20, severe ≥26) with high sensitivity (70-81%) and specificity (85-95%).
Conclusions: The AMSQ-SF demonstrates strong validity and reliability as a questionnaire for individuals with MS, suitable for use in both research and rehabilitation settings.
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the arm function in multiple sclerosis questionnaire-short form (AMSQ-SF) for assessing upper limb function in multiple Sclerosis patients.","authors":"Marzeih Heidari, Malahat Akbarfahimi, Seyed Massood Nabavi, Lidwine B Mokkink, Laleh Lajevardi, Ghorban Taghizadeh","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2026.2614223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2614223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Upper extremity function is crucial for daily living activities. This study aimed to validate the Persian version of the 10-item Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire-Short Form (AMSQ-SF) in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study involving 201 individuals with MS, the AMSQ-SF was evaluated for reliability (test-retest in 50 participants) and construct validity against a battery of established performance-based and patient-reported outcome measures. Spasticity and disability levels were employed to evaluate the questionnaire's ability to differentiate between various subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Persian AMSQ-SF demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub> = 0.94) and internal consistency (α = 0.95). Its strong construct validity was evidenced by correlations in the hypothesized directions with measures of grip strength, quality of life, self-reported function, dexterity, and fatigue. It differentiated patients with and without spasticity and various disability levels (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Clinically useful cutoff scores were established to classify impairment severity (mild ≥16, moderate ≥20, severe ≥26) with high sensitivity (70-81%) and specificity (85-95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AMSQ-SF demonstrates strong validity and reliability as a questionnaire for individuals with MS, suitable for use in both research and rehabilitation settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2026.2623817
Saidan Shetty, G Arun Maiya, Mohandas Rao Kg, Sandeep Vijayan, Shetty Shrija Jaya, Bincy M George
Purpose: Assessing postural stability before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for monitoring recovery and guiding rehabilitation. This study evaluated postural stability and the Romberg quotient in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) before and after TKA, compared with healthy controls.
Materials and methods: This prospective, longitudinal single-center study included 77 individuals with primary knee OA scheduled for TKA and 77 age- and sex-matched controls. Postural stability was assessed using a Win-Track force platform under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions preoperatively and postoperatively. Parameters included center of pressure (CoP) length, area, average sway speed, and sway deviations and the Romberg quotient. Between-group and within-group comparisons were done.
Results: Individuals with knee OA exhibited significantly impaired postural stability compared to controls. Following TKA, progressive improvement was observed, with significant reductions in CoP area and sway deviations. At 12-month post-TKA, postural stability parameters were comparable to controls during eyes-open, with minimal differences during eyes-closed. Romberg quotient showed no statistically significant differences across time points or between groups.
Conclusions: TKA significantly improves postural stability in individuals with knee OA. Despite improvements, subtle deficits in postural control may persist postoperatively. Rehabilitation should emphasize neuromuscular reeducation and sensory integration to optimize balance and reduce fall risk.
{"title":"Comparison of postural stability and Romberg quotient before and after total knee arthroplasty in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.","authors":"Saidan Shetty, G Arun Maiya, Mohandas Rao Kg, Sandeep Vijayan, Shetty Shrija Jaya, Bincy M George","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2026.2623817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2623817","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assessing postural stability before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for monitoring recovery and guiding rehabilitation. This study evaluated postural stability and the Romberg quotient in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) before and after TKA, compared with healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, longitudinal single-center study included 77 individuals with primary knee OA scheduled for TKA and 77 age- and sex-matched controls. Postural stability was assessed using a Win-Track force platform under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions preoperatively and postoperatively. Parameters included center of pressure (CoP) length, area, average sway speed, and sway deviations and the Romberg quotient. Between-group and within-group comparisons were done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with knee OA exhibited significantly impaired postural stability compared to controls. Following TKA, progressive improvement was observed, with significant reductions in CoP area and sway deviations. At 12-month post-TKA, postural stability parameters were comparable to controls during eyes-open, with minimal differences during eyes-closed. Romberg quotient showed no statistically significant differences across time points or between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TKA significantly improves postural stability in individuals with knee OA. Despite improvements, subtle deficits in postural control may persist postoperatively. Rehabilitation should emphasize neuromuscular reeducation and sensory integration to optimize balance and reduce fall risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To assess French- and Dutch-speaking physiotherapists' knowledge, practices, and acceptance of immersive virtual reality (VR) in clinical settings.
Materials and methods: A cross-sectional online survey (NCT06252363) was conducted from February to July 2024, targeting French- and Dutch-speaking physiotherapists via non-probability sampling methods. Data were analyzed descriptively.
Results: A total of 155 physiotherapists from eight countries participated, mostly from Belgium. Most (75.5%) had never used immersive VR, while 12.25% were current users and 12.25% past users. Physiotherapists generally demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of immersive VR. Key facilitators and barriers to usage, reasons for discontinuation, and factors contributing to nonuse were identified. Half of the never-users showed interest in future use, a minority of past users planned to resume, and nearly all current users intended to continue. Attitudes toward immersive VR were mostly positive, though concerns about cost and value for money were noted. Immersive VR was generally perceived as clinically useful and not overly complex. Social influence did not appear to be a key factor in its adoption.
Conclusions: These findings provide insights into the perspectives of French- and Dutch-speaking physiotherapists regarding the use of immersive VR in clinical settings and may help inform the development of implementation strategies targeting physiotherapists.
{"title":"Knowledge, practices, and acceptance of physiotherapists regarding the use of immersive virtual reality in clinical practice: a cross-sectional online survey.","authors":"Alexandre Luc, Syl Slatman, Gauthier Everard, Hanne Huygelier, Laurent Pitance, Christine Detrembleur","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2026.2622898","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2622898","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess French- and Dutch-speaking physiotherapists' knowledge, practices, and acceptance of immersive virtual reality (VR) in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey (NCT06252363) was conducted from February to July 2024, targeting French- and Dutch-speaking physiotherapists <i>via</i> non-probability sampling methods. Data were analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 155 physiotherapists from eight countries participated, mostly from Belgium. Most (75.5%) had never used immersive VR, while 12.25% were current users and 12.25% past users. Physiotherapists generally demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of immersive VR. Key facilitators and barriers to usage, reasons for discontinuation, and factors contributing to nonuse were identified. Half of the never-users showed interest in future use, a minority of past users planned to resume, and nearly all current users intended to continue. Attitudes toward immersive VR were mostly positive, though concerns about cost and value for money were noted. Immersive VR was generally perceived as clinically useful and not overly complex. Social influence did not appear to be a key factor in its adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide insights into the perspectives of French- and Dutch-speaking physiotherapists regarding the use of immersive VR in clinical settings and may help inform the development of implementation strategies targeting physiotherapists.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2026.2619815
Filipe Ferrari, Cássia da Luz Goulart, Leandro Tolfo Franzoni, Gerson Cipriano, Ricardo Stein
Purpose: Although the COVID-19 pandemic has ended, long-term effects persist. Exercise training (ET) supports recovery, but evidence on optimal modalities is limited. This study evaluated the effects of different ET modalities in post-COVID-19 individuals.
Methods: A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 23 September 2025, involving adults with COVID-19. Studies compared ≥4-week interventions-aerobic training, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or combined training (aerobic plus resistance training)-with usual care (UC). Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using RoB 2.0 and GRADE.
Results: Eighteen RCTs (N = 1171) were included. Interventions varied in intensity and duration. Most studies had "some concerns" regarding bias, and overall certainty of evidence was low to very low. Overall, ET modalities were associated with improvements in functional capacity (VO2peak or six-minute walk distance) and muscle strength, although not all studies showed significant differences vs. UC. HIIT demonstrated the greatest VO2peak gain (mean difference: 6.17 ml.kg-1.min-1). Effects on quality of life, anxiety, and depression were inconsistent. Most cardiopulmonary parameters (VE/VCO2 slope, OUES) showed no significant changes, with mixed results for O2 pulse and ventilation.
Conclusions: Despite heterogeneous protocols and low certainty of evidence, structured ET appears beneficial for post-COVID-19 recovery. Multiple ET approaches may be effective rather than a single "optimal" approach.
{"title":"Effects of different exercise training modalities in post-COVID-19 individuals: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Filipe Ferrari, Cássia da Luz Goulart, Leandro Tolfo Franzoni, Gerson Cipriano, Ricardo Stein","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2026.2619815","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2619815","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although the COVID-19 pandemic has ended, long-term effects persist. Exercise training (ET) supports recovery, but evidence on optimal modalities is limited. This study evaluated the effects of different ET modalities in post-COVID-19 individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 23 September 2025, involving adults with COVID-19. Studies compared ≥4-week interventions-aerobic training, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or combined training (aerobic plus resistance training)-with usual care (UC). Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using RoB 2.0 and GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen RCTs (<i>N</i> = 1171) were included. Interventions varied in intensity and duration. Most studies had \"some concerns\" regarding bias, and overall certainty of evidence was low to very low. Overall, ET modalities were associated with improvements in functional capacity (VO<sub>2</sub>peak or six-minute walk distance) and muscle strength, although not all studies showed significant differences vs. UC. HIIT demonstrated the greatest VO<sub>2</sub>peak gain (mean difference: 6.17 ml.kg<sup>-1</sup>.min<sup>-1</sup>). Effects on quality of life, anxiety, and depression were inconsistent. Most cardiopulmonary parameters (VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope, OUES) showed no significant changes, with mixed results for O<sub>2</sub> pulse and ventilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite heterogeneous protocols and low certainty of evidence, structured ET appears beneficial for post-COVID-19 recovery. Multiple ET approaches may be effective rather than a single \"optimal\" approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2026.2620954
Inkeri Salminen, Nora Schroderus, Jani Takatalo
Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of manual therapy with or without exercise therapy in chronic ankle instability (CAI).
Materials and methods: MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, PEDro, EBSCOhost and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from January 2000 to 13th of January 2025 for studies on the manual therapy in the treatment of CAI. The studies with primary outcome measures of ankle range of motion (ROM), pain and self-perceived function were included. A minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used for each outcome measure to define smallest meaningful change. Meta-analysis with random-effect model was performed for studies with similar outcome measures and GRADE analysis for performed for certainty of evidence. Manual therapy interventions were compared with exercise therapy, sham therapy or control group.
Results: The final review included 13 randomized clinical trials and a total of 497 patients. Meta-analysis of ROM, FAAM and CAIT included four, four and five studies, respectively, of which ROM and CAIT were significantly effective compared to comparison groups.
Conclusions: Manual therapy is effective for ankle ROM and self-perceived function (CAIT), although effectiveness remained below the MCID values and certainty of evidence was low.
{"title":"Effectiveness of manual therapy with and without exercise in chronic ankle instability for pain, mobility, and function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Inkeri Salminen, Nora Schroderus, Jani Takatalo","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2026.2620954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2620954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of manual therapy with or without exercise therapy in chronic ankle instability (CAI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, PEDro, EBSCOhost and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from January 2000 to 13<sup>th</sup> of January 2025 for studies on the manual therapy in the treatment of CAI. The studies with primary outcome measures of ankle range of motion (ROM), pain and self-perceived function were included. A minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used for each outcome measure to define smallest meaningful change. Meta-analysis with random-effect model was performed for studies with similar outcome measures and GRADE analysis for performed for certainty of evidence. Manual therapy interventions were compared with exercise therapy, sham therapy or control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final review included 13 randomized clinical trials and a total of 497 patients. Meta-analysis of ROM, FAAM and CAIT included four, four and five studies, respectively, of which ROM and CAIT were significantly effective compared to comparison groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Manual therapy is effective for ankle ROM and self-perceived function (CAIT), although effectiveness remained below the MCID values and certainty of evidence was low.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146108503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2026.2621082
Paula Rabaey, Bridget Ring Kumar, Renee Hepperlen, Jennifer Biggs, Mary O Hearst
Background: Children with disabilities (CWD) experience greater obstacles than those without disabilities, including increased poverty, reduced healthcare opportunities, minimal educational resources, and stigma. This research explored the impact of community interventions on reducing stigma and discrimination toward children with disabilities.
Methods: A repeated cross-sectional survey design (2019/2021) was implemented with community members in three low-resource compounds in Lusaka, Zambia, regarding stigma related to disability and participation in sensitization events via Kusumala+, a community-based intervention designed to improve quality of life for households with CWD. The analysis included descriptive statistics and linear regression assessing group mean change over time.
Results: Participants included N = 259 (2019) and N = 1037 (2021). Subscales of stigma were identified: attitudes (t = 9.7, p < 0.001) and discrimination (t = 4.1, p < 0.001), which both significantly changed from baseline to follow-up. The effect size for the change in discrimination was d = 0.28 (95% CI 0.15-0.42) (weak to moderate effect) and for attitudes was d = 0.67(95% CI 0.53-0.81) (strong effect). Attitudes improved if event attendance occurred and increased with each additional event. In contrast, discrimination improved only when one event attendance occurred, not with each additional event change, in adjusted or unadjusted models.
Conclusion: Sensitization activities and events show promise as targeted interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination and create supportive community environments for CWD and their families.
背景:残疾儿童(CWD)比非残疾儿童面临更大的障碍,包括贫困加剧、医疗保健机会减少、教育资源匮乏和耻辱。本研究探讨了社区干预对减少对残疾儿童的污名和歧视的影响。方法:对赞比亚卢萨卡三个低资源社区的社区成员实施重复横断面调查设计(2019/2021),通过Kusumala+(一种旨在改善CWD家庭生活质量的社区干预措施),调查与残疾相关的耻辱感和敏化事件的参与情况。分析包括描述性统计和线性回归评估组平均随时间的变化。结果:参与者包括N = 259(2019)和N = 1037(2021)。确定了柱头的子量表:态度(t = 9.7, p t = 4.1, p d = 0.28 (95% CI 0.15-0.42)(弱至中等影响)和态度(d = 0.67(95% CI 0.53-0.81)(强影响)。如果参加活动,态度会有所改善,并且随着每增加一次活动而增加。相比之下,在调整或未调整的模型中,歧视只在一个事件发生时有所改善,而不是随着每一个额外的事件变化而改善。结论:宣传活动和事件有望作为有针对性的干预措施,减少羞辱和歧视,并为CWD及其家庭创造支持性的社区环境。
{"title":"Community-based anti-stigma intervention for children with disabilities in Zambia.","authors":"Paula Rabaey, Bridget Ring Kumar, Renee Hepperlen, Jennifer Biggs, Mary O Hearst","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2026.2621082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2621082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with disabilities (CWD) experience greater obstacles than those without disabilities, including increased poverty, reduced healthcare opportunities, minimal educational resources, and stigma. This research explored the impact of community interventions on reducing stigma and discrimination toward children with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A repeated cross-sectional survey design (2019/2021) was implemented with community members in three low-resource compounds in Lusaka, Zambia, regarding stigma related to disability and participation in sensitization events <i>via</i> Kusumala+, a community-based intervention designed to improve quality of life for households with CWD. The analysis included descriptive statistics and linear regression assessing group mean change over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included <i>N</i> = 259 (2019) and <i>N</i> = 1037 (2021). Subscales of stigma were identified: attitudes (<i>t</i> = 9.7, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and discrimination (<i>t</i> = 4.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001), which both significantly changed from baseline to follow-up. The effect size for the change in discrimination was <i>d</i> = 0.28 (95% CI 0.15-0.42) (weak to moderate effect) and for attitudes was <i>d</i> = 0.67(95% CI 0.53-0.81) (strong effect). Attitudes improved if event attendance occurred and increased with each additional event. In contrast, discrimination improved only when one event attendance occurred, not with each additional event change, in adjusted or unadjusted models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sensitization activities and events show promise as targeted interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination and create supportive community environments for CWD and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-06-23DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2520998
Juno Coan-Brill, Frances Aileen Costigan, Tom Chau, Johanna Geytenbeek, Kristine Stadskleiv, Beata Batorowicz, Jessica Kay, Sarah Hopmans, Danijela Grahovac, Barbara Jane Cunningham
Purpose: Currently available methods may not reliably assess language comprehension in children with significant speech and motor limitations. The Computer-Based instrument for Low motor Language Testing (C-BiLLT) is a standardized assessment designed for children with cerebral palsy that allows them to participate using various alternative response methods. This study aimed to understand speech-language pathologists' and occupational therapists' perceived facilitators and barriers to implementing the Canadian C-BiLLT (C-BiLLT-CAN).
Materials and methods: Six focus groups were conducted with 30 clinicians. Transcripts were analyzed using a semi-deductive thematic analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide the identification of clinicians' perceived facilitators and barriers.
Results: Clinicians unanimously reported interest in implementing the C-BiLLT-CAN. Facilitators and barriers were classified into five primary themes. Key facilitators related to the test's evidence-based design, standardized nature, and potential flexibility. Key barriers related to Internet connectivity, the need to expand customization and response options to meet a greater breadth of needs, privacy policies, lack of resources, and perceived costs associated with equipment, training, and time.
Conclusions: Many perceived barriers aligned with previous European and Canadian C-BiLLT implementation research. However, findings elucidated unique considerations that will inform adaptations to the C-BiLLT-CAN and development of training/educational materials.
{"title":"Clinician perspectives on implementing the C-BiLLT-CAN for non-speaking children with cerebral palsy: a focus group study.","authors":"Juno Coan-Brill, Frances Aileen Costigan, Tom Chau, Johanna Geytenbeek, Kristine Stadskleiv, Beata Batorowicz, Jessica Kay, Sarah Hopmans, Danijela Grahovac, Barbara Jane Cunningham","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2520998","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2520998","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Currently available methods may not reliably assess language comprehension in children with significant speech and motor limitations. The Computer-Based instrument for Low motor Language Testing (C-BiLLT) is a standardized assessment designed for children with cerebral palsy that allows them to participate using various alternative response methods. This study aimed to understand speech-language pathologists' and occupational therapists' perceived facilitators and barriers to implementing the Canadian C-BiLLT (C-BiLLT-CAN).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six focus groups were conducted with 30 clinicians. Transcripts were analyzed using a semi-deductive thematic analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide the identification of clinicians' perceived facilitators and barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinicians unanimously reported interest in implementing the C-BiLLT-CAN. Facilitators and barriers were classified into five primary themes. Key facilitators related to the test's evidence-based design, standardized nature, and potential flexibility. Key barriers related to Internet connectivity, the need to expand customization and response options to meet a greater breadth of needs, privacy policies, lack of resources, and perceived costs associated with equipment, training, and time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many perceived barriers aligned with previous European and Canadian C-BiLLT implementation research. However, findings elucidated unique considerations that will inform adaptations to the C-BiLLT-CAN and development of training/educational materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"960-976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144477723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-07DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2554945
Kaat Van Aperen, Sandra Nuyts, Nele Devoogdt, Thierry Troosters, Tessa De Vrieze, Ceren Gürsen, An De Groef
Purpose: This study aims to cross-culturally validate the Dutch version of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Head and Neck version 2.0 (LSIDS-H&N v2.0). This questionnaire assesses the impact of lymphedema and fibrosis symptoms in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients in terms of symptom intensity and related distress.
Materials and methods: The convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the Dutch LSIDS-H&N v2.0 were investigated in 30 HNC patients. Convergent validity was examined by correlating LSIDS-H&N v2.0 scores with four other questionnaires: the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0), Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey version 2.0 (VHNSS v2.0). Eleven hypotheses were tested.
Results: Ten out of 11 hypotheses (91%) were accepted, confirming very strong convergent validity. The Dutch LSIDS-H&N v2.0 demonstrated strong to very strong test-retest reliability (ICCs of 0.792 to 0.963). Very strong internal consistency was demonstrated (Cronbach's α ranging from 0.883 to 0.981).
Conclusion: The Dutch LSIDS-H&N v2.0 proved to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing symptom burden and distress in HNC patients with potential lymphedema and/or fibrosis.
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Head and Neck version 2.0 (LSIDS-H&N v2.0) in head and neck cancer patients.","authors":"Kaat Van Aperen, Sandra Nuyts, Nele Devoogdt, Thierry Troosters, Tessa De Vrieze, Ceren Gürsen, An De Groef","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2554945","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2554945","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to cross-culturally validate the Dutch version of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Head and Neck version 2.0 (LSIDS-H&N v2.0). This questionnaire assesses the impact of lymphedema and fibrosis symptoms in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients in terms of symptom intensity and related distress.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the Dutch LSIDS-H&N v2.0 were investigated in 30 HNC patients. Convergent validity was examined by correlating LSIDS-H&N v2.0 scores with four other questionnaires: the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0), Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey version 2.0 (VHNSS v2.0). Eleven hypotheses were tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten out of 11 hypotheses (91%) were accepted, confirming very strong convergent validity. The Dutch LSIDS-H&N v2.0 demonstrated strong to very strong test-retest reliability (ICCs of 0.792 to 0.963). Very strong internal consistency was demonstrated (Cronbach's α ranging from 0.883 to 0.981).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Dutch LSIDS-H&N v2.0 proved to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing symptom burden and distress in HNC patients with potential lymphedema and/or fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05256238 (S65549).</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1125-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145008531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-06-10DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2513047
Kirsty Laurie, Louise Gustafsson, Michele M Foster, David N Borg
Purpose: To map the 3- and 6-month post-acute rehabilitation and healthcare networks from the perspective of people with Acquired Brain Injury and examine how these relate to funding provision and participation in a specialist transitional rehabilitation service.
Materials and methods: Fifteen adults with an Acquired Brain Injury (mean age 43; range 20-63) participated in semi-structured telephone interviews at 3- and 6-month post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation with a total of 29 interviews conducted. The interview guide was based on a social network framework and data were obtained regarding the composition, size, density, and stability of networks.
Results: Results indicated that participants' networks ranged from 3-10 health professionals. Five typologies were apparent including cohesive, cluster, core, star, and kite network. Participants' networks generally decreased in size and density at 6-month post-discharge. The networks of participants were varied, and differences in network measures were observed when comparing those who were funded by National Injury Insurance Scheme-Queensland and National Disability Insurance Scheme and those that did or did not attend Transitional Rehabilitation Service.
Conclusions: The study highlighted the diversity of individuals' personal networks when assessing their composition and structural characteristics. Through the study, a deeper understanding of the networks and individuals' experiences of service provision under the existing funding and program frameworks was developed.
{"title":"Service access networks at 3- and 6-months after discharge from brain injury rehabilitation: an ego-network analysis.","authors":"Kirsty Laurie, Louise Gustafsson, Michele M Foster, David N Borg","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2513047","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2513047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To map the 3- and 6-month post-acute rehabilitation and healthcare networks from the perspective of people with Acquired Brain Injury and examine how these relate to funding provision and participation in a specialist transitional rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen adults with an Acquired Brain Injury (mean age 43; range 20-63) participated in semi-structured telephone interviews at 3- and 6-month post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation with a total of 29 interviews conducted. The interview guide was based on a social network framework and data were obtained regarding the composition, size, density, and stability of networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that participants' networks ranged from 3-10 health professionals. Five typologies were apparent including cohesive, cluster, core, star, and kite network. Participants' networks generally decreased in size and density at 6-month post-discharge. The networks of participants were varied, and differences in network measures were observed when comparing those who were funded by National Injury Insurance Scheme-Queensland and National Disability Insurance Scheme and those that did or did not attend Transitional Rehabilitation Service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted the diversity of individuals' personal networks when assessing their composition and structural characteristics. Through the study, a deeper understanding of the networks and individuals' experiences of service provision under the existing funding and program frameworks was developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"734-744"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144259270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-06-17DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2519494
Chan-Mei Ho-Henriksson, Carina A Thorstensson, Lena Nordeman, Lena Zidén
Purpose: To explore expectations and experiences of patients who have consulted a physiotherapist in primary healthcare for initial assessment and treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), as well as exploring if this initial contact had affected patients' perceived health status and views of future self-management.
Material and methods: Fifteen participants seeking care for suspected KOA at five rehabilitation centres in Swedish primary healthcare were interviewed. An inductive approach was used. Data material was analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Results: The overall theme was "I want to be physically active as long as I live." Three categories emerged and resulted in eight sub-categories. Participants wanted to get back to their usual physical activities, and to feel free to move the way they wanted. The core treatment, including patient education and individual exercise programs, delivered by a physiotherapist gave patients increased knowledge concerning how to treat KOA on their own.
Conclusion: Participants saw the physiotherapist as a natural first option. It was believed that exercise was the primary treatment alternative to relieve symptoms and that self-management was necessary. The participants were optimistic and had hopes of being able to return to their usual physical activities again.
Clinical trial: Prospectively registered 2022-10-03 in clinicaltrials.gov, reference number: NCT05566925.
{"title":"\"I want to be physically active as long as I live\" Expectations and experiences of direct access to physiotherapist in primary healthcare of patients with knee osteoarthritis.","authors":"Chan-Mei Ho-Henriksson, Carina A Thorstensson, Lena Nordeman, Lena Zidén","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2519494","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2519494","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore expectations and experiences of patients who have consulted a physiotherapist in primary healthcare for initial assessment and treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), as well as exploring if this initial contact had affected patients' perceived health status and views of future self-management.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifteen participants seeking care for suspected KOA at five rehabilitation centres in Swedish primary healthcare were interviewed. An inductive approach was used. Data material was analysed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall theme was \"I want to be physically active as long as I live.\" Three categories emerged and resulted in eight sub-categories. Participants wanted to get back to their usual physical activities, and to feel free to move the way they wanted. The core treatment, including patient education and individual exercise programs, delivered by a physiotherapist gave patients increased knowledge concerning how to treat KOA on their own.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants saw the physiotherapist as a natural first option. It was believed that exercise was the primary treatment alternative to relieve symptoms and that self-management was necessary. The participants were optimistic and had hopes of being able to return to their usual physical activities again.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial: </strong>Prospectively registered 2022-10-03 in clinicaltrials.gov, reference number: NCT05566925.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"941-950"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144310725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}