Current Opinion in Genetics & Development最新文献

N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) is an RNA modification that is catalyzed by the enzyme NAT10. Constitutively found in tRNA and rRNA, ac4C displays a dynamic presence in mRNA that is shaped by developmental and induced shifts in NAT10 levels. However, deciphering ac4C functions in mRNA has been hampered by its context-dependent influences in translation and the complexity of isolating effects on specific mRNAs from other NAT10 activities. Recent advances have begun to overcome these obstacles by leveraging natural variations in mRNA acetylation in cancer, developmental transitions, and immune responses. Here, we synthesize the current literature with a focus on nuances that may fuel the perception of cellular discrepancies toward the development of a cohesive model of ac4C function in mRNA.

Chromatin insulators are DNA–protein complexes that promote specificity of enhancer–promoter interactions and maintain distinct transcriptional states through control of 3D genome organization. In this review, we highlight recent work visualizing how mammalian CCCTC-binding factor acts as a boundary to dynamic DNA loop extrusion mediated by cohesin. We also discuss new studies in both mammals and Drosophila that elucidate biological redundancy of chromatin insulator function and interplay with transcription with respect to topologically associating domain formation. Finally, we present novel concepts in spatiotemporal regulation of chromatin insulator function during differentiation and development and possible consequences of disrupted insulator activity on cellular proliferation.

The modification N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) plays an important role in determining the functional output of gene expression programs. Throughout the transcriptome, the levels of m⁶A are tightly regulated by the opposing activities of methyltransferases and demethylases, as well as the interaction of modified transcripts with m⁶A-dependent RNA-binding proteins that modulate transcript stability, often referred to as writers, erasers, and readers. The enzymatic activities of both writers and erasers are tightly linked to the cellular metabolic environment, as these enzymatic reactions rely on metabolism intermediaries as cofactors. In this review, we highlight the examples of intersection between metabolism and m⁶A-dependent gene regulation and discuss the different contexts where this interaction plays important roles.

Precise gene expression, crucial for normal development and health, depends on the co-ordinated assembly and function of various factors within the crowded nucleus. Recent evidence suggests that this process is in part regulated by mesoscale compartmentalization and concentration of transcriptional components within condensates, offering a new perspective on gene regulation. Dysregulation of transcriptional condensates is increasingly associated with diseases, indicating a potential role in pathogenesis. In this mini-review, we provide a concise overview of the current understanding of the formation and function of transcriptional condensates, with a specific focus on recent advances in their dysregulation and implications in diseases, notably cancer. We also address limitations in the field and highlight open questions for future research.

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most prevalent internal RNA modification in eukaryotic messenger RNAs (mRNAs), regulating gene expression at the transcription and post-transcription levels. Complex interplay between m⁶A and other well-studied epigenetic modifications, including histone modifications and DNA modification, has been extensively reported in recent years. The crosstalk between RNA m⁶A modification and histone/DNA modifications plays a critical role in establishing the chromatin state for the precise and specific fine-tuning of gene expression and undoubtedly has profound impacts on both physiological and pathological processes. In this review, we discuss the crosstalk between RNA m⁶A modification and histone/DNA modifications, emphasizing their sophisticated communications and the mechanisms underlying to gain a comprehensive view of the biological relevance of m⁶A-based epigenetic network.

Recent advances have highlighted the significant roles of post-transcriptional modifications in rRNA in various cancers. Evidence suggests that dysregulation of rRNA modifications acts as a common denominator in cancer development, with alterations in these modifications conferring competitive advantages to cancer cells. Specifically, rRNA modifications modulate protein synthesis and favor the specialized translation of oncogenic programs, thereby contributing to the formation of a protumorigenic proteome in cancer cells. These findings reveal a novel regulatory layer mediated by changes in the deposition of rRNA chemical modifications. Moreover, inhibition of these modifications in vitro and in preclinical studies demonstrates potential therapeutic applications. The recurrence of altered rRNA modification patterns across different types of cancer underscores their importance in cancer progression, proposing them as potential biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets. This review will highlight the latest insights into how post-transcriptional rRNA modifications contribute to cancer progression and summarize the main developments and ongoing challenges in this research area.

All differentiated root cells derive from stem cells spatially organized within the stem cell niche (SCN), a microenvironment located within the root tip. Here, we compiled recent advances in the understanding of how the SCN drives the establishment and maintenance of cell types. The quiescent center (QC) is widely recognized as the primary driver of cell fate determination, but it is recently considered a convergence center of multiple signals. Cell identity of the cortex endodermis initials is mainly driven by the regulatory feedback loops between transcription factors (TFs), acting as mobile signals between neighboring cells, including the QC. As exemplified in the vascular initials, the precise spatial expression of these regulatory TFs is connected with a dynamic hormonal interplay. Thus, stem cell maintenance and cell differentiation are regulated by a plethora of signals forming a complex, multilevel regulatory network. Integrating the transcriptional and post-translational regulations, protein–protein interactions, and mobile signals into models will be fundamental for the comprehensive understanding of SCN maintenance and differentiation.

Polycomb-associated chromatin and pericentromeric heterochromatin form genomic domains important for the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Both Polycomb complexes and heterochromatin factors rely on ‘read and write’ mechanisms, which, on their own, are not sufficient to explain the formation and the maintenance of these epigenetic domains. Microscopy has revealed that they form specific nuclear compartments separated from the rest of the genome. Recently, some subunits of these molecular machineries have been shown to undergo phase separation, both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that phase separation might play important roles in the formation and the function of these two kinds of repressive chromatin. In this review, we will present the recent advances in the field of facultative and constitutive heterochromatin formation and maintenance through phase separation.

As the most well-studied modification in mRNA, m⁶A has been shown to regulate multiple biological processes, including RNA degradation, processing, and translation. Recent studies showed that m⁶A modification is enriched in chromatin-associated RNAs and nascent RNAs, suggesting m⁶A might play regulatory roles in chromatin contexts. Indeed, in the past several years, a number of studies have clarified how m⁶A and its modulators regulate different types of chromatin states. Specifically, in the past 2–3 years, several studies discovered the roles of m⁶A and/or its modulators in regulating constitutive and facultative heterochromatin, shedding interesting lights on RNA-dependent heterochromatin formation in mammalian cells. This review will summarize and discuss the mechanisms underlying m⁶A’s regulation in different types of heterochromatin, with a specific emphasis on the regulation in mammalian embryonic stem cells, which exhibit distinct features of multiple heterochromatin marks.