This conceptual article advances a feminist gerontological perspective on the intellectual and emotional labor of older adults-particularly women. Building on theories of invisible labor, care ethics, and adult learning, this article argues that unpaid, informal knowledge work (e.g., caregiving, mentoring, volunteering, community education) constitutes a form of cognitive labor that is persistently under-acknowledged in aging and education discourse. The analysis highlights the gendered dimensions of later-life learning, contending that older women act as vital yet unrecognized intellectual actors in family and community life. Through a critical synthesis of literature across gerontology, feminist theory, and adult education, this article proposes a new framework for recognizing and valuing intellectual contributions of older learners beyond formal institutions. By documenting this perspective, this article challenges deficit narratives of aging, stimulates dialog about the ethical and political stakes of recognizing cognitive labor, and identifies directions for future research and policy to advance gerontological scholarship.
{"title":"Cognitive labor and the older learner: a feminist perspective on intellectual work in later life.","authors":"Diana Amundsen","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf289","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnaf289","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This conceptual article advances a feminist gerontological perspective on the intellectual and emotional labor of older adults-particularly women. Building on theories of invisible labor, care ethics, and adult learning, this article argues that unpaid, informal knowledge work (e.g., caregiving, mentoring, volunteering, community education) constitutes a form of cognitive labor that is persistently under-acknowledged in aging and education discourse. The analysis highlights the gendered dimensions of later-life learning, contending that older women act as vital yet unrecognized intellectual actors in family and community life. Through a critical synthesis of literature across gerontology, feminist theory, and adult education, this article proposes a new framework for recognizing and valuing intellectual contributions of older learners beyond formal institutions. By documenting this perspective, this article challenges deficit narratives of aging, stimulates dialog about the ethical and political stakes of recognizing cognitive labor, and identifies directions for future research and policy to advance gerontological scholarship.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12848226/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emily L Mroz, Roberta Cruz, Gary Epstein-Lubow, Carolyn Malone, Shelbie Turner
Presentations at academic conferences are an important avenue for discussing scientific problems and disseminating discoveries. Despite efforts to modernize conference session formats in gerontology and other health research fields, session content is critiqued as being overly technical and sometimes disconnected from real-world problems and solutions. In this forum article, the researchers assert that partnering with people with lived experience can help gerontological researchers develop and share conference presentations that are enriched, accessible, and better aligned with important aging-related issues. This article provides guidelines for this type of partnership. The researchers review participatory research approaches and describe the current landscape of engagement in partnership with people with lived experiences to disseminate gerontological research at conferences. They then describe their own recent partnership with a person with lived experience when presenting a symposium at a Gerontological Society of America Annual Scientific Meeting. This experience is presented as a case study that helped us to develop the PARTNER Model for symposium development and delivery. An overview of this model is provided, connecting each tenet to the researchers' experiences in their recent partnership. The article concludes with recommendations for improvements that can support researchers to thoughtfully engage in these types of partnership for future conference presentations.
{"title":"Improving gerontological research dissemination: PARTNERship with people with lived experience in research symposia.","authors":"Emily L Mroz, Roberta Cruz, Gary Epstein-Lubow, Carolyn Malone, Shelbie Turner","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf271","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnaf271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Presentations at academic conferences are an important avenue for discussing scientific problems and disseminating discoveries. Despite efforts to modernize conference session formats in gerontology and other health research fields, session content is critiqued as being overly technical and sometimes disconnected from real-world problems and solutions. In this forum article, the researchers assert that partnering with people with lived experience can help gerontological researchers develop and share conference presentations that are enriched, accessible, and better aligned with important aging-related issues. This article provides guidelines for this type of partnership. The researchers review participatory research approaches and describe the current landscape of engagement in partnership with people with lived experiences to disseminate gerontological research at conferences. They then describe their own recent partnership with a person with lived experience when presenting a symposium at a Gerontological Society of America Annual Scientific Meeting. This experience is presented as a case study that helped us to develop the PARTNER Model for symposium development and delivery. An overview of this model is provided, connecting each tenet to the researchers' experiences in their recent partnership. The article concludes with recommendations for improvements that can support researchers to thoughtfully engage in these types of partnership for future conference presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tianyin Liu, Jessica Kang Qi Lee, Hotinpo Sky Kanagawa, Lihong He, Anna Yan Zhang, Maggie Wai Shan Lo, Dara Kiu Yi Leung, Gloria Hoi Yan Wong, Terry Yat Sang Lum
Background and objectives: While participatory arts are thought to benefit older adults' well-being, evidence has focused on dementia. This umbrella review synthesizes evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) on the impacts of participatory arts for older adults without dementia, and conceptually organizes findings using the proposed "Aesthetic-Engagement-Creativity" (AEC) framework.
Research design and methods: Following PRIOR guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and gray literature to September 2023, with an update in June 2025. Study characteristics and well-being outcomes were extracted. We used the AEC framework for conceptual categorization, assessed primary study overlap using the corrected covered area (CCA) and the methodological quality with the AMSTAR 2.
Results: Eighteen reviews were included, with minimal study overlap (CCA = 1.96%). However, the evidence base was weak; 12 reviews were of low or critically low quality. A synthesis of the six moderate-to-high quality reviews revealed that dance was the most studied modality, associated with improved physical well-being. The benefits for other well-being domains and art modalities were mixed, and significant heterogeneity in study designs and measures complicated comparisons. Our retrospective application of the AEC framework suggests that considering participants' aesthetic preferences and optimizing engagement and creativity levels may be important, but this link is speculative.
Discussion and implications: Participatory arts show potential for promoting well-being of older adults, but robust conclusions are constrained by the poor quality, underrepresented art modalities, and heterogeneity of the existing evidence. The AEC framework is offered as a conceptual tool requiring future empirical validation.
{"title":"Impacts of participatory arts-based interventions on well-being of older adults without dementia: an umbrella review and a conceptual artistic participation framework.","authors":"Tianyin Liu, Jessica Kang Qi Lee, Hotinpo Sky Kanagawa, Lihong He, Anna Yan Zhang, Maggie Wai Shan Lo, Dara Kiu Yi Leung, Gloria Hoi Yan Wong, Terry Yat Sang Lum","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf279","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnaf279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>While participatory arts are thought to benefit older adults' well-being, evidence has focused on dementia. This umbrella review synthesizes evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) on the impacts of participatory arts for older adults without dementia, and conceptually organizes findings using the proposed \"Aesthetic-Engagement-Creativity\" (AEC) framework.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Following PRIOR guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and gray literature to September 2023, with an update in June 2025. Study characteristics and well-being outcomes were extracted. We used the AEC framework for conceptual categorization, assessed primary study overlap using the corrected covered area (CCA) and the methodological quality with the AMSTAR 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen reviews were included, with minimal study overlap (CCA = 1.96%). However, the evidence base was weak; 12 reviews were of low or critically low quality. A synthesis of the six moderate-to-high quality reviews revealed that dance was the most studied modality, associated with improved physical well-being. The benefits for other well-being domains and art modalities were mixed, and significant heterogeneity in study designs and measures complicated comparisons. Our retrospective application of the AEC framework suggests that considering participants' aesthetic preferences and optimizing engagement and creativity levels may be important, but this link is speculative.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Participatory arts show potential for promoting well-being of older adults, but robust conclusions are constrained by the poor quality, underrepresented art modalities, and heterogeneity of the existing evidence. The AEC framework is offered as a conceptual tool requiring future empirical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12854778/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sacramento Pinazo-Hernandis, Rosa Redolat, Antonio Caballer
Background and objectives: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is undergoing a paradigm shift in its application to healthcare, particularly in the context of ageing-related care, with significant implications for disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. The integration of advanced machine learning, deep neural networks, and natural language processing has enabled AI to analyze datasets with remarkable accuracy, surpassing the performance of traditional methods. AI-driven approaches have the potential to facilitate early disease detection, predict progression, and personalize treatments, optimizing healthcare resources. Furthermore, AI is contributing to the development of new treatments and supporting public health strategies. The objective is to assess the effectiveness of AI-based interventions for loneliness.
Research design and methods: This article presents a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses methodology. Databases searched were PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo. A total of 19 articles were identified fulfilling the inclusion criteria, and using validated tools to assess loneliness. Studies were summarized indicating: country, sample, design of the study, measures of loneliness, the AI-based technology main findings and implications.
Results: Findings highlight AI's potential to enhance social well-being among older adults. From a policy perspective, AI-driven analytics enable targeted interventions by identifying trends in age-related health and social issues from the psychology of social intervention. The adoption of AI in ageing policies promotes efficient, inclusive frameworks that support healthy ageing and reduce pressure on traditional healthcare systems.
Discussion and implications: This study contributes to the growing evidence supporting AI's role in addressing loneliness and improving overall quality of life in ageing populations.
背景和目标:人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的应用正在经历范式转变,特别是在与老龄化相关的护理领域,对疾病的预防、诊断和治疗具有重要意义。先进的机器学习、深度神经网络和自然语言处理的集成使人工智能能够以惊人的精度分析数据集,超越传统方法的性能。人工智能驱动的方法有可能促进早期疾病检测,预测进展,个性化治疗,优化医疗资源。此外,人工智能正在促进开发新的治疗方法和支持公共卫生战略。目的是评估基于人工智能的孤独干预措施的有效性。研究设计和方法:本文采用PRISMA方法进行系统回顾。检索的数据库包括Pubmed、Web of Science、Scopus和PsycInfo。共有19篇文章符合纳入标准,并使用经过验证的工具来评估孤独感。研究总结表明:国家、样本、研究设计、孤独感测量、基于人工智能的技术、主要发现和影响。结果:研究结果强调了人工智能在提高老年人社会福祉方面的潜力。从政策角度来看,人工智能驱动的分析可以从社会干预的心理学角度确定与年龄相关的健康和社会问题的趋势,从而实现有针对性的干预。在老龄化政策中采用人工智能可促进有效、包容的框架,支持健康老龄化并减轻传统卫生保健系统的压力。讨论与启示:本研究为越来越多的证据提供了支持,证明人工智能在解决老年人的孤独感和提高整体生活质量方面发挥了作用。
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-based technologies to reduce loneliness and improve social connectedness in older people: a systematic review.","authors":"Sacramento Pinazo-Hernandis, Rosa Redolat, Antonio Caballer","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf267","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnaf267","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is undergoing a paradigm shift in its application to healthcare, particularly in the context of ageing-related care, with significant implications for disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. The integration of advanced machine learning, deep neural networks, and natural language processing has enabled AI to analyze datasets with remarkable accuracy, surpassing the performance of traditional methods. AI-driven approaches have the potential to facilitate early disease detection, predict progression, and personalize treatments, optimizing healthcare resources. Furthermore, AI is contributing to the development of new treatments and supporting public health strategies. The objective is to assess the effectiveness of AI-based interventions for loneliness.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This article presents a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses methodology. Databases searched were PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo. A total of 19 articles were identified fulfilling the inclusion criteria, and using validated tools to assess loneliness. Studies were summarized indicating: country, sample, design of the study, measures of loneliness, the AI-based technology main findings and implications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlight AI's potential to enhance social well-being among older adults. From a policy perspective, AI-driven analytics enable targeted interventions by identifying trends in age-related health and social issues from the psychology of social intervention. The adoption of AI in ageing policies promotes efficient, inclusive frameworks that support healthy ageing and reduce pressure on traditional healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This study contributes to the growing evidence supporting AI's role in addressing loneliness and improving overall quality of life in ageing populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145566317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tetyana P Shippee, Andrew Alberth, Rajean Moone, Jason Flatt, Ziwei Zhang, Nidhi Kohli, Morgan Wright, Carrie Henning-Smith, Sean Cahill, B R Simon Rosser
Background and objectives: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults are more likely to use long-term care (LTC) than their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts. However, LTC settings may lack SGM-affirming policies necessary for inclusive care. This study analyzed the prevalence of SGM-affirming policies in nursing homes (NH) and assisted living facilities (ALF) in Minnesota and examined differences across facility characteristics.
Research design and methods: A survey was conducted across 165 NH and 266 ALF in Minnesota. Facilities were assessed by their explicit inclusion of 28 SGM-affirmative policies, like nondiscrimination and training policies, with a mean index score calculated to determine the overall prevalence of affirming policies. Differences by facility type (NH vs ALF), location (rural vs. urban), ownership (non-profit vs. for-profit), and religious affiliation (religious vs. secular) were assessed in multinomial logistic regression. Latent class analysis compared lower (n = 244) and higher (n = 153) performers across facility characteristics.
Results: Across LTC facilities, there was an average of 11.30 SGM-affirming policies out of 28 policies assessed. Lower performing facilities reported fewer SGM-affirming policies (mean = 7.34) than higher performing facilities (mean = 17.24). No significant differences in policy prevalence were found between NH and ALF; between rural and urban facilities or by ownership status. However, striving facilities were more likely to be secular than religious.
Discussion and implications: The prevalence of SGM-affirming policies was distributed binomially, suggesting facilities fall within two categories (lower performers and high performers). Efforts should focus on adopting SGM-affirmative policies across all LTC facilities to ensure equitable and inclusive care for SGM older adults.
背景和目的:性少数和性别少数(SGM)老年人比他们的顺性别、异性恋同龄人更有可能使用长期护理(LTC)。然而,LTC设置可能缺乏包容性护理所必需的sgm确认政策。本研究分析了明尼苏达州养老院(NH)和辅助生活设施(ALF)中sgm肯定政策的流行情况,并检查了设施特征之间的差异。研究设计和方法:对明尼苏达州165个NH和266个ALF进行了调查。对设施的评估是根据其明确包含28项sgm平权政策,如非歧视和培训政策,并计算出平均指数得分,以确定平权政策的总体流行程度。在多项逻辑回归中评估了设施类型(NH vs ALF)、位置(农村vs城市)、所有权(非营利vs营利性)和宗教信仰(宗教vs世俗)的差异。潜在类别分析比较了不同设施特征的较低(n = 244)和较高(n = 153)表演者。结果:在整个LTC设施中,在评估的28项政策中,平均有11.30项支持sgm的政策。表现较差的设施报告的sgm确认政策(平均= 7.34)比表现较好的设施(平均= 17.24)少。在政策流行度上,国家和地区没有显著差异;城乡设施之间或按所有制地位。然而,奋斗设施更可能是世俗的,而不是宗教的。讨论和影响:肯定sgm政策的流行是二项分布的,表明设施分为两类(低绩效和高绩效)。努力的重点应是在所有LTC设施中采用支持SGM的政策,以确保为SGM老年人提供公平和包容性的护理。
{"title":"Prevalence of sexual and gender minority (SGM) affirmative policies in long-term care facilities in Minnesota.","authors":"Tetyana P Shippee, Andrew Alberth, Rajean Moone, Jason Flatt, Ziwei Zhang, Nidhi Kohli, Morgan Wright, Carrie Henning-Smith, Sean Cahill, B R Simon Rosser","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf290","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults are more likely to use long-term care (LTC) than their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts. However, LTC settings may lack SGM-affirming policies necessary for inclusive care. This study analyzed the prevalence of SGM-affirming policies in nursing homes (NH) and assisted living facilities (ALF) in Minnesota and examined differences across facility characteristics.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A survey was conducted across 165 NH and 266 ALF in Minnesota. Facilities were assessed by their explicit inclusion of 28 SGM-affirmative policies, like nondiscrimination and training policies, with a mean index score calculated to determine the overall prevalence of affirming policies. Differences by facility type (NH vs ALF), location (rural vs. urban), ownership (non-profit vs. for-profit), and religious affiliation (religious vs. secular) were assessed in multinomial logistic regression. Latent class analysis compared lower (n = 244) and higher (n = 153) performers across facility characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across LTC facilities, there was an average of 11.30 SGM-affirming policies out of 28 policies assessed. Lower performing facilities reported fewer SGM-affirming policies (mean = 7.34) than higher performing facilities (mean = 17.24). No significant differences in policy prevalence were found between NH and ALF; between rural and urban facilities or by ownership status. However, striving facilities were more likely to be secular than religious.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The prevalence of SGM-affirming policies was distributed binomially, suggesting facilities fall within two categories (lower performers and high performers). Efforts should focus on adopting SGM-affirmative policies across all LTC facilities to ensure equitable and inclusive care for SGM older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yara K Haddad, Matthew W Brault, Briana Moreland, Cora Peterson, Xinjian Zhang, Karen Thomas, Farah Sublett, Michelle Dougherty, Laurie Imhof, Madeleine E Hackney, Camille P Vaughan, Theodore M Johnson, Elizabeth A Phelan, Gwen Bergen, David B Rein
Background and objectives: Falls are a leading cause of injury and death among older adults (65+). The CDC's STEADI initiative aims to reduce falls by screening to find at-risk individuals, evaluation, and then addressing modifiable risk factors. This study evaluated the effectiveness of implementing a STEADI-based multi-component fall prevention approach via telemedicine in primary care.
Research design and methods: A randomized controlled quality improvement trial (STEADI Options) was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (07/2020-12/2021). Primary care professionals (PCPs) were randomized to either standard-of-care (SOC) or intervention. The intervention included a fall risk assessment by a research nurse, who shared STEADI-based recommendations with PCPs. Recommended interventions were administered at the discretion of PCPs. Outcomes included self-reported falls (primary), medically treated falls, fall-related service utilization (physical therapy, occupational therapy, eye care, podiatry), and medication changes, assessed over one year. Analyses followed an intent-to-treat approach.
Results: Among 660 participants (353 SOC; 307 intervention), the cohort was predominantly female (67.7%), aged 65-79 (73.6%), and non-Hispanic White (56.1%). Intervention participants had higher average Stay Independent Screener (SIS) scores (6.3 vs. 5.2; p < 0.001). Overall, 5.5% reported a fall in the past 12 months. No significant differences were observed between groups in fall-related outcomes (e.g., medically treated falls odds ratio (adjusted for SIS): 0.741; 95% CI: 0.411-1.336).
Discussion and implications: Although no significant differences were found, limited recruitment, low baseline fall rates, and unmeasured adherence may have impacted results. Further research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of telemedicine-based STEADI interventions in primary care.
背景和目的:跌倒是老年人(65岁以上)受伤和死亡的主要原因。美国疾病控制与预防中心的STEADI计划旨在通过筛查发现有风险的个体,评估,然后解决可改变的风险因素来减少跌倒。本研究评估了通过远程医疗在初级保健中实施基于steadi的多成分跌倒预防方法的有效性。研究设计和方法:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间(2020年7月- 2021年12月)进行随机对照质量改善试验(STEADI Options)。初级保健专业人员(pcp)被随机分配到标准护理组(SOC)或干预组。干预措施包括由一名研究护士进行跌倒风险评估,该护士与pcp分享了基于steadi的建议。推荐的干预措施由pcp自行决定。结果包括自我报告的跌倒(初级)、药物治疗的跌倒、跌倒相关服务的利用(物理治疗、职业治疗、眼科护理、足部治疗)和药物改变,评估时间超过一年。分析采用意向治疗方法。结果:在660名参与者中(353名SOC, 307名干预),队列主要是女性(67.7%),65-79岁(73.6%)和非西班牙裔白人(56.1%)。干预参与者的平均住院独立筛查(SIS)评分较高(6.3 vs. 5.2; p)。讨论和意义:虽然没有发现显著差异,但有限的招募、较低的基线跌倒率和未测量的依从性可能会影响结果。需要进一步的研究来评估基于远程医疗的STEADI干预在初级保健中的可行性和有效性。
{"title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Telemedicine-Based STEADI Implementation in Primary Care on Fall Outcomes: The STEADI Options Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yara K Haddad, Matthew W Brault, Briana Moreland, Cora Peterson, Xinjian Zhang, Karen Thomas, Farah Sublett, Michelle Dougherty, Laurie Imhof, Madeleine E Hackney, Camille P Vaughan, Theodore M Johnson, Elizabeth A Phelan, Gwen Bergen, David B Rein","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf292","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Falls are a leading cause of injury and death among older adults (65+). The CDC's STEADI initiative aims to reduce falls by screening to find at-risk individuals, evaluation, and then addressing modifiable risk factors. This study evaluated the effectiveness of implementing a STEADI-based multi-component fall prevention approach via telemedicine in primary care.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled quality improvement trial (STEADI Options) was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (07/2020-12/2021). Primary care professionals (PCPs) were randomized to either standard-of-care (SOC) or intervention. The intervention included a fall risk assessment by a research nurse, who shared STEADI-based recommendations with PCPs. Recommended interventions were administered at the discretion of PCPs. Outcomes included self-reported falls (primary), medically treated falls, fall-related service utilization (physical therapy, occupational therapy, eye care, podiatry), and medication changes, assessed over one year. Analyses followed an intent-to-treat approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 660 participants (353 SOC; 307 intervention), the cohort was predominantly female (67.7%), aged 65-79 (73.6%), and non-Hispanic White (56.1%). Intervention participants had higher average Stay Independent Screener (SIS) scores (6.3 vs. 5.2; p < 0.001). Overall, 5.5% reported a fall in the past 12 months. No significant differences were observed between groups in fall-related outcomes (e.g., medically treated falls odds ratio (adjusted for SIS): 0.741; 95% CI: 0.411-1.336).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Although no significant differences were found, limited recruitment, low baseline fall rates, and unmeasured adherence may have impacted results. Further research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of telemedicine-based STEADI interventions in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145688638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On Transitions and Care Work in Andrea Pallaoro's Monica.","authors":"Ronald W Berkowsky","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf284","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Meghan Fadel, John Shean, Eva Jackson, Janicka D Harris, Juan Rodríguez, Shelby Sutton Roberts
In 2005, congressional support led to the creation of the Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI) and the collaboration between the Alzheimer's Association and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to prioritize brain health in public health practice. Over 20 years, the HBI has developed and implemented the HBI Road Map Series to increase the capacity of health departments to integrate dementia into health departments nationwide, aligning frameworks like the Essential Public Health Services and focusing on health equity across the life course. A growing number of HBI partners now work together to implement public health strategies that promote brain health, address dementia, and support people living with dementia and caregivers. Recognizing opportunities to influence the trajectory of public health action, the HBI prioritizes growing the availability and use of dementia-related public health data and equipping the public health workforce with the knowledge and confidence to make change. This article documents the history and evolution of the HBI, including a description of current efforts and the broader public health context to which it has contributed; efforts of the HBI and partners in national, state, local, territorial, and tribal public health agencies have led to transformative change.
{"title":"The Healthy Brain Initiative-expanding public health capacity to address dementia.","authors":"Meghan Fadel, John Shean, Eva Jackson, Janicka D Harris, Juan Rodríguez, Shelby Sutton Roberts","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf220","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnaf220","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2005, congressional support led to the creation of the Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI) and the collaboration between the Alzheimer's Association and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to prioritize brain health in public health practice. Over 20 years, the HBI has developed and implemented the HBI Road Map Series to increase the capacity of health departments to integrate dementia into health departments nationwide, aligning frameworks like the Essential Public Health Services and focusing on health equity across the life course. A growing number of HBI partners now work together to implement public health strategies that promote brain health, address dementia, and support people living with dementia and caregivers. Recognizing opportunities to influence the trajectory of public health action, the HBI prioritizes growing the availability and use of dementia-related public health data and equipping the public health workforce with the knowledge and confidence to make change. This article documents the history and evolution of the HBI, including a description of current efforts and the broader public health context to which it has contributed; efforts of the HBI and partners in national, state, local, territorial, and tribal public health agencies have led to transformative change.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"S10-S16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12736971/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joseph E Gaugler, Elma Johnson, Gary Epstein-Lubow, Lauren Parker, Fayron Epps, Ashley Millenbah
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded Building Our Largest Dementia (BOLD) Infrastructure's Public Health Center of Excellence on Dementia Caregiving (PHCOE-DC) is one of three national centers designed to help public health departments strengthen and grow their Alzheimer's disease and related dementia initiatives. The PHCOE-DC specializes in disseminating tools and resources to help public health agencies develop programming and partnerships that support family caregivers of individuals with dementia. Through its reach and dissemination efforts, the PHCOE-DC has helped to elevate dementia caregiving as a priority for public health departments. Since 2020, the PHCOE-DC has increased visibility for the role of public health in strengthening the support infrastructure for family caregivers of individuals with dementia and has established a network of national leaders in dementia caregiving. This article summarizes PHCOE-DC's past work and potential future activities as the Center continues to elevate dementia caregiving as a priority for public health.
{"title":"Building a public health infrastructure to support family caregivers of people with dementia.","authors":"Joseph E Gaugler, Elma Johnson, Gary Epstein-Lubow, Lauren Parker, Fayron Epps, Ashley Millenbah","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf223","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnaf223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded Building Our Largest Dementia (BOLD) Infrastructure's Public Health Center of Excellence on Dementia Caregiving (PHCOE-DC) is one of three national centers designed to help public health departments strengthen and grow their Alzheimer's disease and related dementia initiatives. The PHCOE-DC specializes in disseminating tools and resources to help public health agencies develop programming and partnerships that support family caregivers of individuals with dementia. Through its reach and dissemination efforts, the PHCOE-DC has helped to elevate dementia caregiving as a priority for public health departments. Since 2020, the PHCOE-DC has increased visibility for the role of public health in strengthening the support infrastructure for family caregivers of individuals with dementia and has established a network of national leaders in dementia caregiving. This article summarizes PHCOE-DC's past work and potential future activities as the Center continues to elevate dementia caregiving as a priority for public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"S37-S45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12736984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145201922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Healthy Brain Initiative and Building Our Largest Dementia Infrastructure initiatives: 20 years of building a strong public health infrastructure.","authors":"Lisa C McGuire, Heidi L Holt","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf225","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnaf225","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"S1-S9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12736980/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145226351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}