首页 > 最新文献

Language Sciences最新文献

英文 中文
Remarks on Pāṇini's grammar 帕尼尼语法评述
IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101661
Esa Itkonen

First, Pāṇini's grammar the Aṣṭādhyāyī (= ‘Eight Chapters’) is introduced to the reader with the aid of a few representative quotations. After a brief overall characterization of the grammar, its last rule (= “a a”), known to be the shortest grammatical rule in the world, is shown to convey the following message: “Now that the descriptive work is done, language is given back to its speakers.” In philosophy of logic Gentzen's natural deduction is generally preferred over Frege's and Russell's axiomatic approach, but Pāṇini is shown to offer a partial caveat. Finally, his unique role in the annals of scientific thought is justified by the fact that he is both the oldest and the best in his own field.

首先,借助一些有代表性的引文向读者介绍了帕尼尼的语法《八章》(Aṣṭādhyāyī)。在对语法的整体特征进行简要介绍后,最后一条规则(="a a")--众所周知是世界上最短的语法规则--被展示出来,以传达以下信息:"既然描述工作已经完成,语言就还给了它的使用者"。在逻辑哲学中,与弗雷格和罗素的公理化方法相比,人们普遍更倾向于根岑的自然演绎法,但帕蒂尼却提出了部分警告。最后,他在科学思想史上的独特地位是因为他在自己的领域中既是最古老的也是最优秀的。
{"title":"Remarks on Pāṇini's grammar","authors":"Esa Itkonen","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101661","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101661","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>First, Pāṇini's grammar <em>the Aṣṭādhyāyī</em> (= ‘Eight Chapters’) is introduced to the reader with the aid of a few representative quotations. After a brief overall characterization of the grammar, its last rule (= “<em>a a</em>”), known to be the shortest grammatical rule in the world, is shown to convey the following message: “Now that the descriptive work is done, language is given back to its speakers.” In philosophy of logic Gentzen's natural deduction is generally preferred over Frege's and Russell's axiomatic approach, but Pāṇini is shown to offer a partial caveat. Finally, his unique role in the annals of scientific thought is justified by the fact that he is both the oldest and the best in his own field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 101661"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141950778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mutual orientation in and through “skills”: Outline of a problem 在 "技能 "中并通过 "技能 "相互定位:问题概要
IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101660
Clemens Knobloch

This paper is concerned with practical skills as a resource and as an object of deictic procedures in interaction and communication. It is well known that, as a rule, practical skills are not based on knowledge that is formulated—or that can be formulated—in language, nor that practical skills can be described completely and explicitly in language for purposes of learning and teaching. If we examine the activity of speaking, we see that it constitutes itself a practical skill, constrained by the same limits that apply to other practical skills: on the one hand, speaking serves the practical purpose of orienting participants in a discourse, drawing attention to and focussing on what it is used to refer to in the speaking situation, and, on the other hand, its representational function is based on the sub-skills of phonetic, grammatical and semantic articulation, the workings of which cannot be described completely and explicitly by the average speaker. This paper seeks to demonstrate how a broadly conceived notion of deixis and indexicality allows us, in accordance with the multiple reflexivity of language, to begin to make language tractable as a practical skill.

本文关注的是作为互动和交际中的一种资源和一种话语程序对象的实用技能。众所周知,一般来说,实用技能并不是建立在用语言表述或可以用语言表述的知识的基础上,也不是为了学习和教学的目的可以用语言完整而明确地描述实用技能的。如果我们研究一下说话活动,就会发现它本身就是一种实用技能,受到适用于其他实用技能的同样限制:一方面,说话的实用目的是为话语参与者指明方向,引起人们的注意并聚焦于说话情境中的所指;另一方面,它的表述功能基于语音、语法和语义表达等子技能,而普通说话者无法完整而明确地描述这些技能的运作。本文试图说明,根据语言的多重反身性,广义的词性和索引性概念如何使我们开始将语言作为一种实用技能来使用。
{"title":"Mutual orientation in and through “skills”: Outline of a problem","authors":"Clemens Knobloch","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101660","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101660","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is concerned with practical skills as a resource and as an object of deictic procedures in interaction and communication. It is well known that, as a rule, practical skills are not based on knowledge that is formulated—or that can be formulated—in language, nor that practical skills can be described completely and explicitly in language for purposes of learning and teaching. If we examine the activity of speaking, we see that it constitutes itself a practical skill, constrained by the same limits that apply to other practical skills: on the one hand, speaking serves the practical purpose of orienting participants in a discourse, drawing attention to and focussing on what it is used to refer to in the speaking situation, and, on the other hand, its representational function is based on the sub-skills of phonetic, grammatical and semantic articulation, the workings of which cannot be described completely and explicitly by the average speaker. This paper seeks to demonstrate how a broadly conceived notion of deixis and indexicality allows us, in accordance with the multiple reflexivity of language, to begin to make language tractable as a practical skill.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 101660"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000124000494/pdfft?md5=8859282ce1eb7508965f03bf545ce2b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0388000124000494-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141637889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lost and found language: From fuzzy logic to yūgen 失而复得的语言从模糊逻辑到尤源
IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101662
Anton Vladimirovich Sukhoverkhov , Alla Gennadievna Karipidi

On the one side of the language studies, we have linguists who support the practical and theoretical autonomy of language and linguistics and argue that “linguistics must attempt to grasp language, not as a conglomerate of non-linguistic (e.g., physical, physio-logical, psychological, logical, sociological) phenomena, but as a self-sufficient totality, a structure sui generis” (Hjelmslev, 1961, 5–6). On the other side, there are researchers who declare that ‘‘linguistics does not need to postulate the existence of languages as part of its theoretical apparatus’’ (Harris, 2003, 46) or “if you want to learn about language, forget about language!” (Steffensen, 2011, 204). By resorting to the methodology of fuzzy logic and fuzzy sets, ideas of Greek and Eastern philosophy, the research suggests moving away from theoretical binarisation and exploring gradients between extreme positions (autonomous vs heteronomous, universal vs situated, real vs constructed). First of all, the article extends further the ideas of Harris and Steffensen and introduces a new thesis: ‘if you want to lose the language, study it!’. Secondly, the research demonstrates the need for the practical and aesthetical acknowledgment of the reality of language (e.g., in education). To prove the first statement, the emptiness of theoretical efforts to find the entity of language, the research brings into play the ideas of fuzzy logic and critically revises realism, conceptualism and nominalism in language studies. The work provides evidences that neither ‘language’ nor ‘dialects’ or ‘idiolects’ can be found in practice due to the inherent fuzziness of the linguistic facts (systems) ‘described’ by these clear-cut categories. It is argued that theories and concepts designed for the description of the language-related phenomena are theoretical constructions that do not fully capture the stochastic and dynamic reality of language. Instead, they merely construct or declare it, similar to how we create star constellations (Steffensen and Fill, 2014). It resonates with the idea that can be found in Zen Buddhism and Taoism: “name it and you will lose it”. The research also holds that even if ‘language’ is an “ensemble of idiolects, sociolects, dialects and so on – rather than an entity per se” (Hazan, 2015, 11), we cannot find a token of its existence in either the entity or in the elements (ensemble) constituting that hypothetical entity. The article concludes that those researchers who focus on the particular nature of language lose its complexity; conversely, those who embrace all aspects (e.g., integrational approaches) lose its entity. However, if we are not able to grasp theoretically the reality of language does it mean it has no reality whatsoever and researchers and learners cannot have any positive knowledge about the language? The article offers some analogies in favour of the reality of language (comparison with music, r

在语言研究的一方,有语言学家支持语言和语言学在实践和理论上的自主性,认为 "语言学必须试图把握语言,不是将语言作为非语言现象(如物理、物理-逻辑、心理、逻辑、社会学)的集合体,而是作为一个自足的整体,一个自成一体的结构"(Hjelmslev, 1961, 5-6)。另一方面,也有研究者宣称 "语言学不需要假设语言的存在作为其理论装置的一部分"(Harris, 2003, 46)或 "如果你想学习语言,就忘掉语言吧!"(Steffensen, 2011, 46)。(Steffensen, 2011, 204)。通过采用模糊逻辑和模糊集的方法论,以及希腊和东方哲学的思想,该研究建议摒弃理论二元化,探索极端立场之间的梯度(自主与非自主、普遍与情景、真实与建构)。首先,文章进一步扩展了哈里斯和斯蒂芬森的观点,并提出了一个新的论点:"如果你想丢掉语言,那就研究它!"。其次,这项研究表明,有必要从实践和美学角度承认语言的真实性(例如在教育中)。为了证明第一点,即寻找语言实体的理论努力是空洞的,研究引入了模糊逻辑的思想,对语言研究中的现实主义、概念主义和唯名论进行了批判性的修正。这项工作提供的证据表明,无论是 "语言 "还是 "方言 "或 "特选语种",都无法在实践中找到,因为这些明确的分类所 "描述 "的语言事实(系统)本身就具有模糊性。有人认为,为描述与语言有关的现象而设计的理论和概念是一种理论建构,并不能完全捕捉到语言的随机性和动态性。相反,它们只是建构或声明了语言的现实,类似于我们创建星宿的方式(Steffensen and Fill,2014)。这与禅宗和道教的思想不谋而合:"命名它,你将失去它"。该研究还认为,即使 "语言 "是 "特选语、社会选语、方言等的集合体--而非实体本身"(Hazan, 2015, 11),我们也无法在实体或构成假设实体的元素(集合体)中找到其存在的象征。文章的结论是,那些关注语言特殊性的研究者失去了语言的复杂性;反之,那些囊括各个方面的研究者(如整合方法)则失去了语言的实体。然而,如果我们无法从理论上把握语言的真实性,这是否意味着语言没有任何真实性,研究者和学习者就无法对语言有任何积极的认识?文章提供了一些支持语言现实性的类比(与音乐、道路交通、星座的比较),以及基于直觉、隐喻思维和审美理解的语言理解方法。在日本文化中,通过渋い、侘寂和幽玄等美学范畴,可以找到这种直觉观察的例子。因此,文章提出了可持续生态语言学的观点,将语言教学中的常识现实主义和 "语言研究中的非科学印象主义"(引自 Steffensen, 2011, 204)纳入了整合方法的范畴。
{"title":"Lost and found language: From fuzzy logic to yūgen","authors":"Anton Vladimirovich Sukhoverkhov ,&nbsp;Alla Gennadievna Karipidi","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101662","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On the one side of the language studies, we have linguists who support the practical and theoretical autonomy of language and linguistics and argue that “linguistics must attempt to grasp language, not as a conglomerate of non-linguistic (e.g., physical, physio-logical, psychological, logical, sociological) phenomena, but as a self-sufficient totality, a structure <em>sui generis</em>” (Hjelmslev, 1961, 5–6). On the other side, there are researchers who declare that ‘‘linguistics does not need to postulate the existence of languages as part of its theoretical apparatus’’ (Harris, 2003, 46) or “if you want to learn about language, forget about language!” (Steffensen, 2011, 204). By resorting to the methodology of fuzzy logic and fuzzy sets, ideas of Greek and Eastern philosophy, the research suggests moving away from theoretical binarisation and exploring gradients between extreme positions (autonomous vs heteronomous, universal vs situated, real vs constructed). First of all, the article extends further the ideas of Harris and Steffensen and introduces a new thesis: ‘if you want to lose the language, study it!’. Secondly, the research demonstrates the need for the <em>practical and aesthetical</em> acknowledgment of the reality of language (e.g., in education). To prove the first statement, the emptiness of <em>theoretical</em> efforts to find the entity of language, the research brings into play the ideas of fuzzy logic and critically revises realism, conceptualism and nominalism in language studies. The work provides evidences that neither ‘language’ nor ‘dialects’ or ‘idiolects’ can be found in practice due to the inherent fuzziness of the linguistic facts (systems) ‘described’ by these clear-cut categories. It is argued that theories and concepts designed for the description of the language-related phenomena are theoretical constructions that do not fully capture the stochastic and dynamic reality of language. Instead, they merely construct or declare it, similar to how we create star constellations (Steffensen and Fill, 2014). It resonates with the idea that can be found in Zen Buddhism and Taoism: “name it and you will lose it”. The research also holds that even if ‘language’ is an “ensemble of idiolects, sociolects, dialects and so on – rather than an entity per se” (Hazan, 2015, 11), we cannot find a token of its existence in either the entity or in the elements (ensemble) constituting that hypothetical entity. The article concludes that those researchers who focus on the particular nature of language lose its complexity; conversely, those who embrace all aspects (e.g., integrational approaches) lose its entity. However, if we are not able to grasp <em>theoretically</em> the reality of language does it mean it has no reality whatsoever and researchers and learners cannot have any <em>positive knowledge</em> about <em>the language</em>? The article offers some analogies in favour of the reality of language (comparison with music, r","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 101662"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141607412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Language awareness: On the semiotics of talk and text 语言意识:关于谈话和文本的符号学
IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101659
Alexander V. Kravchenko

The article argues for a necessity to increase human awareness of language as functional biological behavior rather than simply a tool in the service of communication, by emphasizing the difference between talk and text as ontologically different semiotic phenomena characteristic of the human cognitive domain. The established tradition to view written words as linguistic signs leads the studies of natural language astray, effectively hiding its nature as biologically functional orientational behavior in a consensual domain that evolved with the evolution of our species and was not a cultural invention. Because of the identification of text with talk in linguistic semiotics, the empirical validity of the core semiotic concept of natural linguistic sign, based on the so-called semiotic triangle, is undermined. While talk is a dynamic fact of nature, text is a static artifact; it is argued, therefore, that the analytical approach to linguistic signs as objects in the world is inadequate, and the notions of first- and second-order semiotics are introduced. It is concluded that awareness of the cognitive-semiotic difference between talk and text and their respective roles in the evolution of humans may facilitate further research into the nature and origin of humanness.

文章通过强调谈话和文字作为人类认知领域本体论上不同的符号现象的区别,认为有必要提高人类对语言作为生物功能行为的认识,而不仅仅是一种为交流服务的工具。将书面文字视为语言符号的既定传统将自然语言研究引入歧途,实际上掩盖了自然语言作为生物功能性定向行为的本质,而这种定向行为是随着我们人类的进化而进化的,并非文化发明。由于语言符号学将文本与谈话相提并论,以所谓符号学三角为基础的自然语言符号这一核心符号学概念的实证有效性受到了削弱。谈话是自然界的动态事实,而文本则是静态的人工制品;因此,将语言符号作为世界客体的分析方法是不充分的,并引入了一阶和二阶符号学的概念。结论是,认识到谈话和文本之间的认知-符号学差异及其各自在人类进化中的作用,可能有助于进一步研究人类的本质和起源。
{"title":"Language awareness: On the semiotics of talk and text","authors":"Alexander V. Kravchenko","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101659","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101659","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article argues for a necessity to increase human awareness of language as functional biological behavior rather than simply a tool in the service of communication, by emphasizing the difference between talk and text as ontologically different semiotic phenomena characteristic of the human cognitive domain. The established tradition to view written words as linguistic signs leads the studies of natural language astray, effectively hiding its nature as biologically functional orientational behavior in a consensual domain that evolved with the evolution of our species and was not a cultural invention. Because of the identification of text with talk in linguistic semiotics, the empirical validity of the core semiotic concept of natural linguistic sign, based on the so-called semiotic triangle, is undermined. While talk is a dynamic fact of nature, text is a static artifact; it is argued, therefore, that the analytical approach to linguistic signs as objects in the world is inadequate, and the notions of first- and second-order semiotics are introduced. It is concluded that awareness of the cognitive-semiotic difference between talk and text and their respective roles in the evolution of humans may facilitate further research into the nature and origin of humanness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101659"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141478550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Skills, language and indexicality – Determining a relationship 技能、语言和索引性 - 确定关系
IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101658
Janette Friedrich

This paper investigates the concept of skills or abilities using the distinction between ‘knowing that’ and ‘knowing how', as put forward by Gilbert Ryle in his 1949 book The Concept of Mind. The assertion of two forms of knowledge suggests the possibility that skills can be represented in propositional language. However, in the analysis of activities it is frequently shown that skills cannot be described ‘in words', but at best can be indicated. On the other hand, speaking is itself a skill. If we accept Karl Bühler’s (1934) use of the concept of context we see that he describes representative language above all as a skill. The paper closes with a consideration of whether and, if so, to what extent it is possible to square these two conceptions of language.

本文利用吉尔伯特-赖尔(Gilbert Ryle)在其 1949 年出版的《心智的概念》一书中提出的 "知道那个"(knowing that)和 "知道如何"(knowing how)之间的区别来研究技能或能力的概念。对两种知识形式的断言表明,技能可以用命题语言来表示。然而,在对活动进行分析时,我们经常发现,技能无法 "用语言 "来描述,充其量只能被指出。另一方面,说话本身就是一种技能。如果我们接受卡尔-比勒(Karl Bühler,1934 年)对语境概念的使用,我们就会发现他将代表性语言首先描述为一种技能。本文最后探讨了这两种语言概念是否可以相容,以及在多大程度上可以相容。
{"title":"Skills, language and indexicality – Determining a relationship","authors":"Janette Friedrich","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101658","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101658","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the concept of skills or abilities using the distinction between ‘knowing that’ and ‘knowing how', as put forward by Gilbert Ryle in his 1949 book <em>The Concept of Mind</em>. The assertion of two forms of knowledge suggests the possibility that skills can be represented in propositional language. However, in the analysis of activities it is frequently shown that skills cannot be described ‘in words', but at best can be indicated. On the other hand, speaking is itself a skill. If we accept Karl Bühler’s (1934) use of the concept of context we see that he describes representative language above all as a skill. The paper closes with a consideration of whether and, if so, to what extent it is possible to square these two conceptions of language.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101658"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141478654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Forms and functions of self-repetition in Mandarin child-directed speech 普通话儿童定向言语中自我重复的形式和功能
IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101644
Chiung-chih Huang

The present study aims to investigate how self-repetition is used to serve communicative purposes in Mandarin mother–child interaction, focusing particularly on mothers’ child-directed speech. The participants of this study consisted of 12 Mandarin-speaking children (4 two-year-olds, 4 three-year-olds, and 4 four-year-olds) and their mothers. Natural conversation from each mother–child dyad was collected for a total of 12 h. The occurrences of self-repetition in the data were analyzed in terms of their forms and functions. The results showed that the mothers of younger children tended to use self-repetition more frequently than the mothers of older children. The predominant form of self-repetition was expanded repetition, and the major functions were soliciting responses and emphasis. Detailed analyses showed how the mothers used the different forms of self-repetition to express various functions. It was concluded that self-repetition in child-directed speech plays an important role in facilitating mother–child interaction and that it may also reflect mothers’ sensitivity to the developing linguistic, cognitive, and communicative abilities of their children.

本研究旨在探讨在普通话母子互动中,母亲如何利用自我重复来达到交际目的,尤其关注母亲以儿童为主导的言语。本研究的参与者包括 12 名说普通话的儿童(4 名 2 岁、4 名 3 岁和 4 名 4 岁儿童)及其母亲。研究从形式和功能两方面分析了数据中出现的自我重复现象。结果显示,年龄较小的孩子的母亲比年龄较大的孩子的母亲更经常使用自我重复。自我重复的主要形式是扩大重复,主要功能是征求回答和强调。详细分析显示了母亲如何使用不同形式的自我重复来表达各种功能。研究得出结论,儿童引导言语中的自我重复在促进母子互动方面发挥着重要作用,同时也反映了母亲对儿童语言、认知和交流能力发展的敏感性。
{"title":"Forms and functions of self-repetition in Mandarin child-directed speech","authors":"Chiung-chih Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101644","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study aims to investigate how self-repetition is used to serve communicative purposes in Mandarin mother–child interaction, focusing particularly on mothers’ child-directed speech. The participants of this study consisted of 12 Mandarin-speaking children (4 two-year-olds, 4 three-year-olds, and 4 four-year-olds) and their mothers. Natural conversation from each mother–child dyad was collected for a total of 12 h. The occurrences of self-repetition in the data were analyzed in terms of their forms and functions. The results showed that the mothers of younger children tended to use self-repetition more frequently than the mothers of older children. The predominant form of self-repetition was expanded repetition, and the major functions were soliciting responses and emphasis. Detailed analyses showed how the mothers used the different forms of self-repetition to express various functions. It was concluded that self-repetition in child-directed speech plays an important role in facilitating mother–child interaction and that it may also reflect mothers’ sensitivity to the developing linguistic, cognitive, and communicative abilities of their children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101644"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141438351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diachronic changes of number use in written American English from 1923 to 2008 1923 年至 2008 年美国书面英语中数字使用的异时变化
IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101656
Gui Wang , Jing Shu , Li Wang

This study examines diachronic changes in number use in written American English from 1923 to 2008 in TIME magazine, analyzing a 170-million-token corpus. We investigate the effects of magnitudes, roundness, and representational formats on number frequency, along with the evolution of culturally salient numbers reflecting societal shifts. Utilizing Bayesian negative binomial regression for in-depth corpus analysis, our findings demonstrate a consistent influence of magnitudes and roundness, with smaller magnitudes and rounder numbers appearing more frequently. We observe a significant standardization in portraying large numbers, marked by a shift from numerical to mixed forms (e.g., “6,000,000,000” to “6 billion”) around 1940s. This reflects changes in both formal writing conventions and editorial practices of numerical representation. Our research further identifies distinct culturally significant numbers for each decade, linked to social, economic, and technological trends, underscoring the role of numerical analysis in media to decode complex cultural and societal patterns. This study contributes significantly to understanding the dynamic interplay between language, culture, and media in the context of numerical representations.

本研究通过分析 1.7 亿条语料库,考察了 1923 年至 2008 年期间《时代》周刊上美国英语书面语中数字使用的异时变化。我们研究了大小、圆度和表示格式对数字频率的影响,以及反映社会变迁的文化突出数字的演变。利用贝叶斯负二项回归法对语料库进行深入分析,我们的研究结果表明,大小和圆度的影响是一致的,较小的大小和较圆的数字出现的频率更高。我们观察到,在描述大数字时出现了明显的标准化现象,其标志是在 20 世纪 40 年代前后从数字形式向混合形式的转变(例如,从 "6,000,000,000 "到 "60 亿")。这反映了数字表述的正式写作惯例和编辑实践的变化。我们的研究进一步确定了每个年代与社会、经济和技术趋势相关的具有文化意义的独特数字,强调了媒体中的数字分析在解读复杂的文化和社会模式方面的作用。这项研究对理解数字表述背景下语言、文化和媒体之间的动态相互作用做出了重要贡献。
{"title":"Diachronic changes of number use in written American English from 1923 to 2008","authors":"Gui Wang ,&nbsp;Jing Shu ,&nbsp;Li Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101656","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101656","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines diachronic changes in number use in written American English from 1923 to 2008 in TIME magazine, analyzing a 170-million-token corpus. We investigate the effects of magnitudes, roundness, and representational formats on number frequency, along with the evolution of culturally salient numbers reflecting societal shifts. Utilizing Bayesian negative binomial regression for in-depth corpus analysis, our findings demonstrate a consistent influence of magnitudes and roundness, with smaller magnitudes and rounder numbers appearing more frequently. We observe a significant standardization in portraying large numbers, marked by a shift from numerical to mixed forms (e.g., “6,000,000,000” to “6 billion”) around 1940s. This reflects changes in both formal writing conventions and editorial practices of numerical representation. Our research further identifies distinct culturally significant numbers for each decade, linked to social, economic, and technological trends, underscoring the role of numerical analysis in media to decode complex cultural and societal patterns. This study contributes significantly to understanding the dynamic interplay between language, culture, and media in the context of numerical representations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141433924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bibliography as a language communication tool 作为语言交流工具的书目
IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101657
Agnieszka Gołda, Jacek Tomaszczyk

In scientific inquiry and the dissemination of knowledge, bibliographies emerge as cornerstone elements within the expansive communication system, serving multifaceted roles indispensable to scholarly dialogue and the popularization of scientific findings. This study delves into the intrinsic significance and application of bibliographies, highlighting their roles in the communication process and retrieval of diverse entities, including books, articles, and electronic resources. The construction of bibliography entries utilizes a specialized bibliographic language characterized by its quasi-natural, uncontrolled vocabulary designed to facilitate communication. The strength of this bibliographic language is notably anchored in its grammar, imparting to it a universal communicative capacity that allows for the comprehension of meanings solely through the bibliographic scheme. This research examines bibliographies embedded within scientific texts to confirm references to existing sources, aiming to assert the universality of bibliographies as a language tool in scientific communication. Through an analysis of the functions and structure of bibliographic language, it is demonstrated that such bibliographies not only enhance the flow of information but also play a crucial role in conveying reliable and verifiable data, thereby fostering the advancement of scientific discovery.

在科学探索和知识传播的过程中,书目成为广阔的传播系统中的基石元素,在学术对话和科学发现的普及中发挥着不可或缺的多方面作用。本研究深入探讨了书目的内在意义和应用,强调了书目在传播过程和检索图书、文章和电子资源等不同实体中的作用。书目条目的构建使用了一种专门的书目语言,其特点是准自然、不受控制的词汇,旨在促进交流。这种书目语言的优势主要体现在其语法上,赋予了它一种通用的交流能力,使人们仅通过书目方案就能理解其含义。本研究对科学文本中的书目进行了研究,以确认对现有资料来源的引用,旨在证明书目作为科学交流语言工具的普遍性。通过对书目语言的功能和结构的分析,研究表明这类书目不仅能促进信息的流动,还能在传递可靠和可验证的数据方面发挥关键作用,从而促进科学发现的进步。
{"title":"Bibliography as a language communication tool","authors":"Agnieszka Gołda,&nbsp;Jacek Tomaszczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101657","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101657","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In scientific inquiry and the dissemination of knowledge, bibliographies emerge as cornerstone elements within the expansive communication system, serving multifaceted roles indispensable to scholarly dialogue and the popularization of scientific findings. This study delves into the intrinsic significance and application of bibliographies, highlighting their roles in the communication process and retrieval of diverse entities, including books, articles, and electronic resources. The construction of bibliography entries utilizes a specialized bibliographic language characterized by its quasi-natural, uncontrolled vocabulary designed to facilitate communication. The strength of this bibliographic language is notably anchored in its grammar, imparting to it a universal communicative capacity that allows for the comprehension of meanings solely through the bibliographic scheme. This research examines bibliographies embedded within scientific texts to confirm references to existing sources, aiming to assert the universality of bibliographies as a language tool in scientific communication. Through an analysis of the functions and structure of bibliographic language, it is demonstrated that such bibliographies not only enhance the flow of information but also play a crucial role in conveying reliable and verifiable data, thereby fostering the advancement of scientific discovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101657"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reconceptualizing the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition: An appraisal of Lenneberg's work on the epigenesis of language 重新认识第二语言习得关键期假说:对伦纳伯格语言表观成因研究的评价
IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101645
Gunnar Norrman

The critical period hypothesis (CPH) as an explanation of age effects on language learning has been a perennial source of contention in the field of second language acquisition (SLA). Although this hypothesis – which suggests that adult language learning is constrained by biological or maturational changes in the brain – has been based on the work of Eric Lenneberg (i.e. Biological Foundations of Language, 1967), it does not reflect Lenneberg's original biological theory of language. In this paper, the CPH is examined in light of a comprehensive review of Lenneberg's work and related disciplines. By outlining Lenneberg's notion of epigenesis in language development, it is argued that the CPH interpretation of the critical period notion that has long skewed the debate over age effects in SLA must be re-evaluated, and that any reference to “Lenneberg's CPH” can – and should – be abandoned.

关键期假说(CPH)作为对语言学习的年龄效应的解释,一直是第二语言习得(SLA)领域争论的焦点。尽管这一假说认为成人语言学习受到大脑生物学或成熟变化的制约,但它是以埃里克-伦纳伯格的研究成果(即《语言的生物学基础》,1967 年)为基础的,并不反映伦纳伯格最初的语言生物学理论。本文在全面回顾伦纳伯格的工作和相关学科的基础上,对 CPH 进行了研究。通过概述伦纳伯格在语言发展中的表观成因概念,本文认为,必须重新评估 "伦纳伯格的表观成因 "对关键期概念的解释,这一解释长期以来歪曲了关于 SLA 中年龄效应的争论,任何关于 "伦纳伯格的表观成因 "的提法都可以--而且应该--放弃。
{"title":"Reconceptualizing the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition: An appraisal of Lenneberg's work on the epigenesis of language","authors":"Gunnar Norrman","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101645","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101645","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The critical period hypothesis (CPH) as an explanation of age effects on language learning has been a perennial source of contention in the field of second language acquisition (SLA). Although this hypothesis – which suggests that adult language learning is constrained by biological or maturational changes in the brain – has been based on the work of Eric Lenneberg (i.e. <em>Biological Foundations of Language</em>, 1967), it does not reflect Lenneberg's original biological theory of language. In this paper, the CPH is examined in light of a comprehensive review of Lenneberg's work and related disciplines. By outlining Lenneberg's notion of epigenesis in language development, it is argued that the CPH interpretation of the critical period notion that has long skewed the debate over age effects in SLA must be re-evaluated, and that any reference to “Lenneberg's CPH” can – and should – be abandoned.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101645"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000124000342/pdfft?md5=8ad208e49b5a7faa7c8e8a913d8d7e8d&pid=1-s2.0-S0388000124000342-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141323363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sequence analysis in the development of ethnomethodological conversation analysis 人种学会话分析发展过程中的序列分析
IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101646
H. Walter Schmitz

When Harvey Sacks and Emanuel A. Schegloff explored the possibility of a ‘naturalistic observational discipline that could deal with the details of social action(s) rigorously, empirically, and formally’ (Schegloff and Sacks, 1973), it was not by chance that their attention was attracted by records of natural conversations and by conversation as an activity in its own right. For, in conversation, every action, every speaking turn of its participants presents itself as a clearly determinable unit with a beginning and end. This appearance is reinforced by the conversation's transcript, which presents in a seeming order, a sequence of turns. Sequence analysis was developed for ‘conversations’ from this observational basis. In this paper, the requirements and implications concerning the role of indexicality in organising and interpreting participants' turns are examined critically and it is investigated whether sequence analysis is also applicable as a proof procedure to ‘talk in interaction’ and multimodal face-to-face interaction. It is argued that unclearly determined non-verbal actions and multiple forms of simultaneous events may restrict the applicability of sequence analysis or even prevent its successful application altogether. It is argued that for different forms of (communicative) interaction and their constitutive conditions of perception an empirical investigation of the relation between simultaneity and sequentiality may be necessary.

当哈维-萨克斯(Harvey Sacks)和伊曼纽尔-A-谢格洛夫(Emanuel A. Schegloff)探索 "自然主义观察学科 "的可能性时,他们的注意力被自然对话的记录以及对话本身作为一种活动所吸引,这绝非偶然(Schegloff and Sacks, 1973)。因为,在会话中,参与者的每一个动作、每一个说话的转折都是一个有头有尾、清晰可辨的单元。会话记录强化了这一表象,它以一种看似有序的方式呈现了一连串的回合。序列分析就是在这一观察基础上为 "会话 "开发的。本文批判性地研究了索引性在组织和解释参与者回合时的作用的要求和影响,并探讨了序列分析作为一种证明程序是否也适用于 "互动中的谈话 "和多模态面对面互动。研究认为,不明确的非语言行为和多种形式的同时发生的事件可能会限制序列分析的适用性,甚至完全阻碍其成功应用。本文认为,对于不同形式的(交流)互动及其感知的构成条件,可能有必要对同时性和顺序性之间的关系进行实证调查。
{"title":"Sequence analysis in the development of ethnomethodological conversation analysis","authors":"H. Walter Schmitz","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101646","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When Harvey Sacks and Emanuel A. Schegloff explored the possibility of a ‘naturalistic observational discipline that could deal with the details of social action(s) rigorously, empirically, and formally’ (Schegloff and Sacks, 1973), it was not by chance that their attention was attracted by records of natural conversations and by conversation as an activity in its own right. For, in conversation, every action, every speaking turn of its participants presents itself as a clearly determinable unit with a beginning and end. This appearance is reinforced by the conversation's transcript, which presents in a seeming order, a sequence of turns. Sequence analysis was developed for ‘conversations’ from this observational basis. In this paper, the requirements and implications concerning the role of indexicality in organising and interpreting participants' turns are examined critically and it is investigated whether sequence analysis is also applicable as a proof procedure to ‘talk in interaction’ and multimodal face-to-face interaction. It is argued that unclearly determined non-verbal actions and multiple forms of simultaneous events may restrict the applicability of sequence analysis or even prevent its successful application altogether. It is argued that for different forms of (communicative) interaction and their constitutive conditions of perception an empirical investigation of the relation between simultaneity and sequentiality may be necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000124000354/pdfft?md5=fb82601e3da9fafbdcebcd68ba83f3ce&pid=1-s2.0-S0388000124000354-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141323362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Language Sciences
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1