Telemedicine is a technology-based health service that can be carried out remotely by health workers to improve public health. This study aims to determine the status of telemedicine service provider applications in medical practice therapeutic transactions, the status of doctors' practice licenses (SIP) in telemedicine practice, and the limits of clinical authority that doctors can exercise in providing medical services form of Telemedicine. This research method is normative juridical by analyzing library materials, secondary legal materials, and the results of interviews with informants. The study results found that the telemedicine service provider application is not an official health facility, the SIP used as a requirement in telemedicine-based applications does not comply with applicable regulations, and the limited clinical authority for telemedicine practice is consultation and initial therapy.
{"title":"LIMITATIONS OF CLINICAL AUTHORITY AND MEDICAL PRACTICE THROUGH APPLICATION-BASED TELEMEDICINE","authors":"Chandrika Karis Adhalia","doi":"10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2962","url":null,"abstract":"Telemedicine is a technology-based health service that can be carried out remotely by health workers to improve public health. This study aims to determine the status of telemedicine service provider applications in medical practice therapeutic transactions, the status of doctors' practice licenses (SIP) in telemedicine practice, and the limits of clinical authority that doctors can exercise in providing medical services form of Telemedicine. This research method is normative juridical by analyzing library materials, secondary legal materials, and the results of interviews with informants. The study results found that the telemedicine service provider application is not an official health facility, the SIP used as a requirement in telemedicine-based applications does not comply with applicable regulations, and the limited clinical authority for telemedicine practice is consultation and initial therapy.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83628239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Agreement as part of civil law is one of everyday life's most frequently performed actions. This study aims to anticipate the development of digital agreements by contextualizing the provisions of laws and regulations regarding agreements. This research is normative legal research that uses statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study confirm that efforts to mitigate digital agreements following contract law are by still referring to Article 1320 of the Civil Code by prioritizing four orientations to minimize risks in digital agreements. First, the preventive orientation by looking at the parties who are invited to enter into agreements. Second, the prudence and proportionality in reading the provisions in digital agreements. Third, the prudence and proportionality of digital agreements by including names as well as identities that can be contacted and can be accounted for by the parties. Fourth, prudence and proportionality in determining the object of the agreement. Furthermore, the orientation of digital agreements based on the principle of proportionality based on philosophical, sociological, and juridical aspects requires specific arrangements, particularly regarding the minimum requirements for implementing digital agreements. That is because the unique characteristics of digital agreements need special arrangements regarding the terms of the validity of digital agreements, which in general still refer to Article 1320 of the Civil Code.
{"title":"THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY ON DIGITAL BUSINESS AGREEMENTS: BETWEEN MITIGATION AND ORIENTATION","authors":"M. Arifin, Z. Arifin, Mac Thi Hoai Thuong","doi":"10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2954","url":null,"abstract":"The Agreement as part of civil law is one of everyday life's most frequently performed actions. This study aims to anticipate the development of digital agreements by contextualizing the provisions of laws and regulations regarding agreements. This research is normative legal research that uses statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study confirm that efforts to mitigate digital agreements following contract law are by still referring to Article 1320 of the Civil Code by prioritizing four orientations to minimize risks in digital agreements. First, the preventive orientation by looking at the parties who are invited to enter into agreements. Second, the prudence and proportionality in reading the provisions in digital agreements. Third, the prudence and proportionality of digital agreements by including names as well as identities that can be contacted and can be accounted for by the parties. Fourth, prudence and proportionality in determining the object of the agreement. Furthermore, the orientation of digital agreements based on the principle of proportionality based on philosophical, sociological, and juridical aspects requires specific arrangements, particularly regarding the minimum requirements for implementing digital agreements. That is because the unique characteristics of digital agreements need special arrangements regarding the terms of the validity of digital agreements, which in general still refer to Article 1320 of the Civil Code.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77208004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To minimize starter packs, the Government, through Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Number 12 of 2016 jo. Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Informatics Number 14 of 2017 concerning the Registration of Telecommunications Service Customers requires consumers to send personal data to the operator as a National Identity Number and Family Card Number or biological mother's name. However, this condition needs to be addressed appropriately, bearing in mind that the use of personal data by irresponsible parties without approval or authorization or because electronic system failures are prone to occur. The problems in this research are further examining the legal relationship between the provider and the consumer, the provider's responsibility to the consumer's data regarding starter pack registration, and the legal remedies consumers can take when personal data protection fails. The method used in this research is normative, carried out by reviewing existing laws and regulations and the literature related to the research topic. This study's results indicate a legal relationship between providers and consumers marked by registration recruitment. The provider, in this case, is the party that formulates the agreement, while the consumer only agrees and follows the agreed terms. Furthermore, the operator has responsibility for the telecommunications services it provides, including maintaining legitimacy, truth, accuracy, and relevance, as well as suitability to obtain, collect, analyzing, process, display, store, post, send, disseminate, to destroying personal data by the provisions legislation. And suppose there is a failure to protect the confidentiality of personal data. In that case, consumers can file legal remedies through complaints, civil lawsuits through court and alternative dispute resolution, or prosecution of providers.
{"title":"PROVIDER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR DATA PERSONAL CONSUMER ASSOCIATED WITH PRIME CARD REGISTRATION","authors":"Anugrah Prima Utama","doi":"10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2794","url":null,"abstract":"To minimize starter packs, the Government, through Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Number 12 of 2016 jo. Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Informatics Number 14 of 2017 concerning the Registration of Telecommunications Service Customers requires consumers to send personal data to the operator as a National Identity Number and Family Card Number or biological mother's name. However, this condition needs to be addressed appropriately, bearing in mind that the use of personal data by irresponsible parties without approval or authorization or because electronic system failures are prone to occur. The problems in this research are further examining the legal relationship between the provider and the consumer, the provider's responsibility to the consumer's data regarding starter pack registration, and the legal remedies consumers can take when personal data protection fails. The method used in this research is normative, carried out by reviewing existing laws and regulations and the literature related to the research topic. This study's results indicate a legal relationship between providers and consumers marked by registration recruitment. The provider, in this case, is the party that formulates the agreement, while the consumer only agrees and follows the agreed terms. Furthermore, the operator has responsibility for the telecommunications services it provides, including maintaining legitimacy, truth, accuracy, and relevance, as well as suitability to obtain, collect, analyzing, process, display, store, post, send, disseminate, to destroying personal data by the provisions legislation. And suppose there is a failure to protect the confidentiality of personal data. In that case, consumers can file legal remedies through complaints, civil lawsuits through court and alternative dispute resolution, or prosecution of providers.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134952210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is the organ of the company that has the highest authority in the company, and all decisions relating to the company are stipulated through the GMS after certain conditions have been met as stipulated in the laws and regulations. The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) and the legal consequences of the Implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders organized by PT. KOLINGKAS in terms of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This study uses normative legal research methods and uses a qualitative approach. As well as using primary, secondary and tertiary sources of legal materials from books, journals, laws and regulations related to the holding of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders. The results of the study show that the legality of holding an EGMS by shareholders can be seen from the legal consequences of holding an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) held by PT. KOLINGKAS, in holding the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, the Plaintiff as a Member of the Board of Directors was not given any defense by the Defendants, in this case PT. KLK and also the plan to dismiss the Plaintiff as Director were not notified in advance to the Plaintiff, the implementation was carried out unilaterally, or the directors did not know about it, so that the Plaintiff was dismissed by the EGMS as stated in Deed Number 06 concerning Minutes of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of PT. KLK does not meet the requirements and procedures set out in UUPT and is an unlawful act, then it has violated laws and regulations or it is considered that the decision is legally flawed. So that for fraudulent acts committed by parties within the company, the party conducting the Extraordinary GMS activities can be held liable for civil liability for these actions.
{"title":"LEGALITY EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS IMPLEMENTATION BY SHAREHOLDERS","authors":"Andhes Tan Satrisna","doi":"10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2930","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2930","url":null,"abstract":"The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is the organ of the company that has the highest authority in the company, and all decisions relating to the company are stipulated through the GMS after certain conditions have been met as stipulated in the laws and regulations. The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) and the legal consequences of the Implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders organized by PT. KOLINGKAS in terms of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This study uses normative legal research methods and uses a qualitative approach. As well as using primary, secondary and tertiary sources of legal materials from books, journals, laws and regulations related to the holding of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders. The results of the study show that the legality of holding an EGMS by shareholders can be seen from the legal consequences of holding an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) held by PT. KOLINGKAS, in holding the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, the Plaintiff as a Member of the Board of Directors was not given any defense by the Defendants, in this case PT. KLK and also the plan to dismiss the Plaintiff as Director were not notified in advance to the Plaintiff, the implementation was carried out unilaterally, or the directors did not know about it, so that the Plaintiff was dismissed by the EGMS as stated in Deed Number 06 concerning Minutes of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of PT. KLK does not meet the requirements and procedures set out in UUPT and is an unlawful act, then it has violated laws and regulations or it is considered that the decision is legally flawed. So that for fraudulent acts committed by parties within the company, the party conducting the Extraordinary GMS activities can be held liable for civil liability for these actions.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83793522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This research was conducted to find out the agreement made by the husband and wife before the marriage takes place which is called the marriage agreement or prenuptial agreement which regulates the separation of assets. The joint assets that are formed in marriage are from the time the marriage takes place until the date the marriage bond is broken. Furthermore, based on Article 38 of Law no. 16 of 2019 stipulates that marriages can be dissolved due to: death; divorce; and by court decision. This study uses the Normative Juridical legal research method, whose approach is carried out by examining statutory regulations that can be used as a legal reference in the application of Prenuptial agreements and analyzing the judge's decision at the Bandar Lampung Religious High Court Number: 0004/Pdt.G/2021/PTA.Bdl dated January 27, 2021 as a guideline for sharing joint assets after divorce. The results of this study are that there is a legal position in the settlement of the distribution of joint assets after divorce and shows that the legal position in the settlement of the distribution of joint assets after marriage has been regulated in marriage law and the compilation of Islamic law. Furthermore, the judge's consideration regarding the distribution of joint assets in the Religious Court Decision No.0004/Pdt.G/2021/PTA.Bdl. regarding the divorce decision.
{"title":"IMPLEMENTATION NATIONAL AGREEMENTS IN THE DIVISION OF COLLECTIVE PROPERTY IN THE TIME OF DIVORCE","authors":"Yulius Oktaber","doi":"10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2945","url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted to find out the agreement made by the husband and wife before the marriage takes place which is called the marriage agreement or prenuptial agreement which regulates the separation of assets. The joint assets that are formed in marriage are from the time the marriage takes place until the date the marriage bond is broken. Furthermore, based on Article 38 of Law no. 16 of 2019 stipulates that marriages can be dissolved due to: death; divorce; and by court decision. This study uses the Normative Juridical legal research method, whose approach is carried out by examining statutory regulations that can be used as a legal reference in the application of Prenuptial agreements and analyzing the judge's decision at the Bandar Lampung Religious High Court Number: 0004/Pdt.G/2021/PTA.Bdl dated January 27, 2021 as a guideline for sharing joint assets after divorce. The results of this study are that there is a legal position in the settlement of the distribution of joint assets after divorce and shows that the legal position in the settlement of the distribution of joint assets after marriage has been regulated in marriage law and the compilation of Islamic law. Furthermore, the judge's consideration regarding the distribution of joint assets in the Religious Court Decision No.0004/Pdt.G/2021/PTA.Bdl. regarding the divorce decision.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82561430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The spread of Covid-19 has caused many debtors to be unable to carry out their achievements in contracts. The problems in this research are related to force majeure according to civil law in Indonesia, whether what is included in the qualifications for the Covid-19 pandemic can be categorized as force majeure according to Indonesian civil law and the legal consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic related to the implementation of business contracts. This type of research is normative legal research and descriptive research. The results of the study show that the characteristics of force majeure in civil law in Indonesia are not regulated in the Civil Code. Force majeure refers to events that cannot be predicted by humans or are related to natural events. The proof is that the cause of force majeure may not necessarily be categorized as force majeure. Several force majeure characteristics must be met as a reason for force majeure due to the Covid-19 pandemic by the debtor. This shows that the use of force majeure reasons still has a heavy burden and responsibility on the part of the debtor, there are restrictions on the application of force majeure. There are also incidents in the form of the Covid-19 pandemic or government policies that arose as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. It needs to be reviewed based on the nature of force majeure and the need for propriety or good faith of the debtor even though an event hinders the fulfillment of achievements.
{"title":"IMPLICATIONS OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE IMPLEMENTATION BUSINESS CONTRACTS","authors":"Mutia Kartika Putri","doi":"10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2920","url":null,"abstract":"The spread of Covid-19 has caused many debtors to be unable to carry out their achievements in contracts. The problems in this research are related to force majeure according to civil law in Indonesia, whether what is included in the qualifications for the Covid-19 pandemic can be categorized as force majeure according to Indonesian civil law and the legal consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic related to the implementation of business contracts. This type of research is normative legal research and descriptive research. The results of the study show that the characteristics of force majeure in civil law in Indonesia are not regulated in the Civil Code. Force majeure refers to events that cannot be predicted by humans or are related to natural events. The proof is that the cause of force majeure may not necessarily be categorized as force majeure. Several force majeure characteristics must be met as a reason for force majeure due to the Covid-19 pandemic by the debtor. This shows that the use of force majeure reasons still has a heavy burden and responsibility on the part of the debtor, there are restrictions on the application of force majeure. There are also incidents in the form of the Covid-19 pandemic or government policies that arose as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. It needs to be reviewed based on the nature of force majeure and the need for propriety or good faith of the debtor even though an event hinders the fulfillment of achievements.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90305952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pengaturan batas usia minimal perkawinan yang berbeda antara pria dan wanita tidak saja menimbulkan diskriminasi dalam konteks pelaksanaan hak untuk membentuk keluarga sebagaimana dijamin dalam Pasal 28B ayat (1) UUD 1945, melainkan juga telah menimbulkan diskriminasi terhadap pelindungan dan pemenuhan hak anak sebagaimana dijamin dalam Pasal 28B ayat (2) UUD 1945. Dalam hal ini, ketika usia minimal perkawinan bagi wanita lebih rendah dibandingkan pria, maka secara hukum wanita dapat lebih cepat untuk membentuk keluarga. Oleh karena hal tersebut, dalam amar putusannya Mahkamah Konstitusi memerintahkan kepada pembentuk undang-undang untuk dalam jangka waktu paling lama 3 (tiga) tahun melakukan perubahan terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Terbitnya Undang-undang No 16 tahun 2019 tentang perubahan UU No1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, merupakan Perubahan norma dalam hal perkawinan khususnyan batas usia untuk melakukan perkawinan dan sekaligus perbaikan norma dengan menaikkan batas minimal umur perkawinan bagi wanita. Hal ini belum banyak diketahui masyarakat luas, oleh karena itu pengabdian yang kami lakukan di desa Malaka kabupaten Lombok Utara, kami melakukan sosialisasi mengenai perubahan ketentuan perkawinan yang dilakukan menurut hukum nasional. Dalam hal ini batas minimal umur perkawinan bagi wanita dipersamakan dengan batas minimal umur perkawinan bagi pria, yaitu 19 (sembilan belas) tahun. Batas usia dimaksud dinilai telah matang jiwa raganya untuk dapat melangsungkan perkawinan agar dapat mewujudkan tujuan perkawinan secara baik tanpa berakhir pada perceraian dan mendapat keturunan yang sehat dan berkualitas.
{"title":"Peningkatan Pemahaman UU Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Di Desa Malaka","authors":"Lalu Hadi Adha","doi":"10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2353","url":null,"abstract":"Pengaturan batas usia minimal perkawinan yang berbeda antara pria dan wanita tidak saja menimbulkan diskriminasi dalam konteks pelaksanaan hak untuk membentuk keluarga sebagaimana dijamin dalam Pasal 28B ayat (1) UUD 1945, melainkan juga telah menimbulkan diskriminasi terhadap pelindungan dan pemenuhan hak anak sebagaimana dijamin dalam Pasal 28B ayat (2) UUD 1945. Dalam hal ini, ketika usia minimal perkawinan bagi wanita lebih rendah dibandingkan pria, maka secara hukum wanita dapat lebih cepat untuk membentuk keluarga. Oleh karena hal tersebut, dalam amar putusannya Mahkamah Konstitusi memerintahkan kepada pembentuk undang-undang untuk dalam jangka waktu paling lama 3 (tiga) tahun melakukan perubahan terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Terbitnya Undang-undang No 16 tahun 2019 tentang perubahan UU No1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, merupakan Perubahan norma dalam hal perkawinan khususnyan batas usia untuk melakukan perkawinan dan sekaligus perbaikan norma dengan menaikkan batas minimal umur perkawinan bagi wanita. Hal ini belum banyak diketahui masyarakat luas, oleh karena itu pengabdian yang kami lakukan di desa Malaka kabupaten Lombok Utara, kami melakukan sosialisasi mengenai perubahan ketentuan perkawinan yang dilakukan menurut hukum nasional. Dalam hal ini batas minimal umur perkawinan bagi wanita dipersamakan dengan batas minimal umur perkawinan bagi pria, yaitu 19 (sembilan belas) tahun. Batas usia dimaksud dinilai telah matang jiwa raganya untuk dapat melangsungkan perkawinan agar dapat mewujudkan tujuan perkawinan secara baik tanpa berakhir pada perceraian dan mendapat keturunan yang sehat dan berkualitas.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78590415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar hukum masyarakat yang melakukan pengelolaan hutan di kawasan Geopark Rinjani serta bagaimana peran pemerintah dalam mengawasi tindakan masyarakat terhadap pengelolaan hutan di kawasan Geopark Rinjani khususnya di kawasan hutan Benang Kelambu. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan sosiologis dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa (1) dasar hukum masyarakat melakukan pengelolaan yaitu hutan mengacu pada Surat Keputusan (SK) Menteri Kehutanan No. 436/Menhut-II/07 Tentang Penetapan Areal Kerja Hutan Kemasyarakatan serta diperkuat dengan aturan-aturan yang melegalkan kegiatan tersebut. (2) Adapun peran pemerintah terhadap pengelolaan hutan yaitu: peran untuk menguasai, mengelola, mengatur serta peran untuk mengawasi agar kelestarian hutan dapat terjaga dengan baik.
{"title":"Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pengelolaan Hutan Oleh Masyarakat Di Kawasan Geopark Rinjani","authors":"Khairuddin Khairuddin, M. Fathoni","doi":"10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2196","url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar hukum masyarakat yang melakukan pengelolaan hutan di kawasan Geopark Rinjani serta bagaimana peran pemerintah dalam mengawasi tindakan masyarakat terhadap pengelolaan hutan di kawasan Geopark Rinjani khususnya di kawasan hutan Benang Kelambu. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan sosiologis dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa (1) dasar hukum masyarakat melakukan pengelolaan yaitu hutan mengacu pada Surat Keputusan (SK) Menteri Kehutanan No. 436/Menhut-II/07 Tentang Penetapan Areal Kerja Hutan Kemasyarakatan serta diperkuat dengan aturan-aturan yang melegalkan kegiatan tersebut. (2) Adapun peran pemerintah terhadap pengelolaan hutan yaitu: peran untuk menguasai, mengelola, mengatur serta peran untuk mengawasi agar kelestarian hutan dapat terjaga dengan baik.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80024373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Restrukturisasi kredit merupakan salah satu upaya penyelamatan yang dilakukan oleh pihak koperasi untuk memperbaiki kegiatan anggota koperasi yang mengalami kesulitan untuk memenuhi kewajibannya karena adanya dampak dari pandemi covid-19. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui terhadap kemampuan anggota koperasi dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian kredit di era pandemi covid-19. Metode yang digunakan adalah Normatif-Empiris yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan secara langsung di lapangan untuk mengetahui permasalahan yang sebenarnya terjadi, kemudian akan dihubungkan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan teori hukum yang ada. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan perjanjian kredit mengalami perbedaan dari sebelumnya dikarenakan adanya pandemi covid-19.
{"title":"Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Kemampuan Anggota Koperasi Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Pinjaman Kredit Di Era Pandemi Covid-19","authors":"Aditya Billy Kusuma, Salim Salim","doi":"10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2143","url":null,"abstract":"Restrukturisasi kredit merupakan salah satu upaya penyelamatan yang dilakukan oleh pihak koperasi untuk memperbaiki kegiatan anggota koperasi yang mengalami kesulitan untuk memenuhi kewajibannya karena adanya dampak dari pandemi covid-19. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui terhadap kemampuan anggota koperasi dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian kredit di era pandemi covid-19. Metode yang digunakan adalah Normatif-Empiris yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan secara langsung di lapangan untuk mengetahui permasalahan yang sebenarnya terjadi, kemudian akan dihubungkan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan teori hukum yang ada. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan perjanjian kredit mengalami perbedaan dari sebelumnya dikarenakan adanya pandemi covid-19.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85957548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa apa saja hak-hak yang diperoleh pekerja PKWT yang di PHK dan bagaimana dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Nomor 15/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Mtr. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual dan kasus. Jenis dan sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Teknik/Cara memperoleh bahan hukum dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan. Analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian Hak-hak yang diperoleh pekerja PKWT yang di PHK berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Nomor 15/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Mtr. tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundangan-undangan, dalam hal ini Majelis Hakim hanya mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor yuridisnya saja tanpa mempertimbangkan faktor non yuridis.
{"title":"Hak-Hak Dari Pekerja Pkwt Yang Di PHK","authors":"Abd-El-Fattah Haikal, Zaeni Asyhadie","doi":"10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2133","url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa apa saja hak-hak yang diperoleh pekerja PKWT yang di PHK dan bagaimana dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Nomor 15/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Mtr. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual dan kasus. Jenis dan sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Teknik/Cara memperoleh bahan hukum dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan. Analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian Hak-hak yang diperoleh pekerja PKWT yang di PHK berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Nomor 15/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Mtr. tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundangan-undangan, dalam hal ini Majelis Hakim hanya mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor yuridisnya saja tanpa mempertimbangkan faktor non yuridis.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84033016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：