ABSTRACTIndonesian supremacy of law principle is the ground rule to control the democracy flow in society. In order to do so, Pretrial institution is introduced. Pretrial, under Constitution Court Session Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, also has a jurisdiction in examining suspect naming procedure by investigator. Despite being regulated, there was found in which judge made decision to name a suspect, whereas the provision instructed the judge to only take measure and examine suspect naming by investigator, therefore undermining given regulation. This conceptual research conducted under normative method. Historical, grammatical, concept and case approach also applied. The result demonstrates that evaluating suspect naming could support and undermine Pancasila simultaneously.Keywords : pretrial, Pancasila, suspect naming, democracy INTISARIPraperadilan hadir sebagai bentuk pengawas terhadap peran penyidik dan penuntut umum, dalam hal ini, berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 menambahkan kewenangan salah satunya untuk menguji keabsahan penetapan tersangka. Wujud kontrol yang demikian ternyata tidak sepenuhnya diterapkan oleh hakim dengan baik. Peristiwa yang menjadi bukti luputnya penerapan pemeriksaan keabsahan tersangka salah satunya dimana hakim Praperadilan memerintahkan menetapkan tersangka, dengan demikian melampaui batas kewenangan. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah normatif dengan pendekatan filosofis, gramatikal, konsep dan kasus. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa wewenang Praperadilan dalam menentukan keabsahan tersangka dapat mendukung, tetapi sekaligus dapat juga menjadi alat peruntuh demokrasi Pancasila.Kata kunci : praperadilan, Pancasila, penetapan tersangka, demokrasi
印尼法律至上原则是控制社会民主流动的基本原则。为此,引入了审前制度。根据宪法法院第21/PUU-XII/2014号会议,预审也有审查调查人员指认嫌疑人程序的管辖权。虽然有规定,但有法官决定嫌疑人的规定,而规定法官只对调查人员提出的嫌疑人进行措施和审查,因此违反了规定。本概念性研究是在规范方法下进行的。历史的、语法的、概念的和个案的方法也适用。结果表明,评估嫌疑人命名可以同时支持和破坏Pancasila。关键词:预审,Pancasila,嫌疑人命名,民主INTISARIPraperadilan hadir sebagai bentuk pengawas terhadap peran penyidik dan penuntut umum, dalam hal ini, berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 menambahkan kewenangan salah satunya untuk menguji keabsahan penetapan tersangka。武巨控制杨德米克特尼塔塔塔七世尼亚迪特拉坎奥勒姆登甘拜克。我是杨先生,我是杨先生,我是杨先生,我是杨先生,我是杨先生,我是杨先生,我是杨先生,我是杨先生,我是杨先生。中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:中文:英文。我的名字叫“我的名字”,我的名字叫“我的名字”,我的名字叫“我的名字”,我的名字叫“我的名字”。Kata kunci: praperadilan, Pancasila, penetapan tersangka, demokrasi
{"title":"PEMERIKSAAN KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN TERSANGKA OLEH PRAPERADILAN DALAM KONSTELASI PANCASILA","authors":"Ariesta Wibisono Anditya","doi":"10.24002/JEP.V34I1.1731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24002/JEP.V34I1.1731","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIndonesian supremacy of law principle is the ground rule to control the democracy flow in society. In order to do so, Pretrial institution is introduced. Pretrial, under Constitution Court Session Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, also has a jurisdiction in examining suspect naming procedure by investigator. Despite being regulated, there was found in which judge made decision to name a suspect, whereas the provision instructed the judge to only take measure and examine suspect naming by investigator, therefore undermining given regulation. This conceptual research conducted under normative method. Historical, grammatical, concept and case approach also applied. The result demonstrates that evaluating suspect naming could support and undermine Pancasila simultaneously.Keywords : pretrial, Pancasila, suspect naming, democracy INTISARIPraperadilan hadir sebagai bentuk pengawas terhadap peran penyidik dan penuntut umum, dalam hal ini, berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 menambahkan kewenangan salah satunya untuk menguji keabsahan penetapan tersangka. Wujud kontrol yang demikian ternyata tidak sepenuhnya diterapkan oleh hakim dengan baik. Peristiwa yang menjadi bukti luputnya penerapan pemeriksaan keabsahan tersangka salah satunya dimana hakim Praperadilan memerintahkan menetapkan tersangka, dengan demikian melampaui batas kewenangan. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah normatif dengan pendekatan filosofis, gramatikal, konsep dan kasus. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa wewenang Praperadilan dalam menentukan keabsahan tersangka dapat mendukung, tetapi sekaligus dapat juga menjadi alat peruntuh demokrasi Pancasila.Kata kunci : praperadilan, Pancasila, penetapan tersangka, demokrasi","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45611012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pancasila has been the state ideology of Indonesia since the day after the independence of Indonesia that is on the 18th of August 1945. It was formulated by our founding fathers by taking our own values and cultures inherited by our ancestors from some old kingdoms such as Kutai in Kalimantan, Sriwijaya in Sumatra, and Majapahit in Java. One year after the independence on the 17th of August 1945, Indonesian government promulgated Law No. 1 Year 1946 concerning The Penal Code on 26th of February 1946. Through this law the government at that time stated that Wetboek van Strafrecht voor Nederlandsch-Indie (W.v.S. Ned. Indie (S. 1915 No. 732) as the main written penal code and was formally called Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) which in Article 10 provides death penalty as the heaviest main punishment. Dealing with that provision there has been a long debate among Indonesian people whether death penalty is in accordance with Pancasila or not. Netherlands as the home base of death penalty dropped it out from its penal code in 1870 because of the strong struggle of human right proponents. In Indonesia a research carried out in 1981/1982 by The Law Faculty of Undip collaborating with the The Supreme Court found out that both proponents and opponents of death penalty used Pancasila as “justification”. In the effort to give respect to both parties legal drafters of the Penal Code Bill provide death penalty as “specific punishment” and put it out of the main punishment in the Penal Code Bill.Key Words: Pancasila, State ideology, Legal drafters, Specific punishment, The Penal Code Bill.
自1945年8月18日印度尼西亚独立后的第二天起,Pancasila就一直是印度尼西亚的国家意识形态。它是由我们的开国元勋们根据我们祖先从加里曼丹的库泰、苏门答腊的斯里维贾亚和爪哇的马贾帕希特等古老王国继承的我们自己的价值观和文化制定的。1945年8月17日独立一年后,印度尼西亚政府于1946年2月26日颁布了关于《刑法典》的1946年第1号法律。通过这项法律,当时的政府规定,Wetboek van Strafrecht voor Nederlandsch Indie(W.v.S.Ned.Indie(S.1915 No.732))是主要的成文刑法,并被正式称为Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana(KUHP),在第10条中规定死刑是最重的主要刑罚。关于这一条款,印尼人民一直在争论死刑是否符合Pancasila。1870年,由于人权支持者的强烈斗争,作为死刑发源地的荷兰将其从刑法中删除。在印度尼西亚,Undip法学院于1981/1982年与最高法院合作进行的一项研究发现,死刑的支持者和反对者都将Pancasila作为“正当理由”。为了尊重双方,《刑法典法案》的法律起草者将死刑定为“特定惩罚”,并将其从《刑法典》法案的主要惩罚中删除。关键词:Pancasila,国家意识形态,法律起草者,特定惩罚,《刑典法案》。
{"title":"THE IMPACT OF PANCASILA AS THE STATE IDEOLOGY OF INDONESIA TOWARD THE PROVISION ON DEATH PENALTY IN THE PENAL CODE BILL","authors":"Cesar antonio Munthe, Paulinus Soge","doi":"10.24002/JEP.V34I1.1629","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24002/JEP.V34I1.1629","url":null,"abstract":"Pancasila has been the state ideology of Indonesia since the day after the independence of Indonesia that is on the 18th of August 1945. It was formulated by our founding fathers by taking our own values and cultures inherited by our ancestors from some old kingdoms such as Kutai in Kalimantan, Sriwijaya in Sumatra, and Majapahit in Java. One year after the independence on the 17th of August 1945, Indonesian government promulgated Law No. 1 Year 1946 concerning The Penal Code on 26th of February 1946. Through this law the government at that time stated that Wetboek van Strafrecht voor Nederlandsch-Indie (W.v.S. Ned. Indie (S. 1915 No. 732) as the main written penal code and was formally called Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) which in Article 10 provides death penalty as the heaviest main punishment. Dealing with that provision there has been a long debate among Indonesian people whether death penalty is in accordance with Pancasila or not. Netherlands as the home base of death penalty dropped it out from its penal code in 1870 because of the strong struggle of human right proponents. In Indonesia a research carried out in 1981/1982 by The Law Faculty of Undip collaborating with the The Supreme Court found out that both proponents and opponents of death penalty used Pancasila as “justification”. In the effort to give respect to both parties legal drafters of the Penal Code Bill provide death penalty as “specific punishment” and put it out of the main punishment in the Penal Code Bill.Key Words: Pancasila, State ideology, Legal drafters, Specific punishment, The Penal Code Bill.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49309499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman kepada konsumen properti di Indonesia mengenai dasar hukum, proses perijinan, hingga proses pengurusan sertifikat rumah susun / apartemen di Indonesia. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa permasalahan tentang rumah susun terjadi secara vertikal dan horizontal. Konflik vertikal yang terjadi adalah antara peraturan perundang – undangan dengan peraturan – peraturan pelaksananya, belum terjalinnya koordinasi dan integrasi antar lembaga tentang apartemen / rumah susun. Sedangkan konflik horizontal yang terjadi adalah antara konsumen, developer, dan pemerintah. Semua permasalahan tersebut bermuara dari belum mengakomodasinya semua kebutuhan pihak – pihak terkait oleh peraturan perundang – undangan tentang rumah susun di Indonesia. Selain itu kurangnya pemerintah melakukan sosialiasi dan pemahaman kepada masyarakat tentang apartemen / rumah susun diikuti dengan pasifnya masyarakat untuk mencari informasi seputar hukum rumah susun / apartemen dan menyamakan dengan hukum rumah tapak pada umumnya membuat permasalahan rumah susun di Indonesia semakin bertambah dan tidak kunjung selesai.Kata Kunci : hukum rumah susun, perizinan, dan sertifikat Abstract This research was intended to provide the society, it could be investor or consumer about the comprehension of apartment law in Indonesia, started it from the legal basis, the licensing process, and the strata title. This study concluded that the problem of the apartment in Indonesia occurred vertically and horizontally. Vertical conflict happened whether those regulations and government body which liable for apartment is not establishment and integration yet. Whereas the horizontal conflict happened was between consumers, developers, and government. Those problems came from the regulation that could not accommodate the needs of these party. Beside of the lack of government which should held and responsible the socialization and understansing the society about apartment law, added by the passive Indonesian society to do research or find an information about apartment law and though that apartment law as the same as landed house law leading to the next problem of apartment law in Indonesia.Keywords : apartment law, the license, and strata title
{"title":"HUKUM APARTEMEN DALAM PRAKTEKNYA DI INDONESIA","authors":"A. Rahmawati","doi":"10.24002/JEP.V34I1.1216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24002/JEP.V34I1.1216","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman kepada konsumen properti di Indonesia mengenai dasar hukum, proses perijinan, hingga proses pengurusan sertifikat rumah susun / apartemen di Indonesia. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa permasalahan tentang rumah susun terjadi secara vertikal dan horizontal. Konflik vertikal yang terjadi adalah antara peraturan perundang – undangan dengan peraturan – peraturan pelaksananya, belum terjalinnya koordinasi dan integrasi antar lembaga tentang apartemen / rumah susun. Sedangkan konflik horizontal yang terjadi adalah antara konsumen, developer, dan pemerintah. Semua permasalahan tersebut bermuara dari belum mengakomodasinya semua kebutuhan pihak – pihak terkait oleh peraturan perundang – undangan tentang rumah susun di Indonesia. Selain itu kurangnya pemerintah melakukan sosialiasi dan pemahaman kepada masyarakat tentang apartemen / rumah susun diikuti dengan pasifnya masyarakat untuk mencari informasi seputar hukum rumah susun / apartemen dan menyamakan dengan hukum rumah tapak pada umumnya membuat permasalahan rumah susun di Indonesia semakin bertambah dan tidak kunjung selesai.Kata Kunci : hukum rumah susun, perizinan, dan sertifikat Abstract This research was intended to provide the society, it could be investor or consumer about the comprehension of apartment law in Indonesia, started it from the legal basis, the licensing process, and the strata title. This study concluded that the problem of the apartment in Indonesia occurred vertically and horizontally. Vertical conflict happened whether those regulations and government body which liable for apartment is not establishment and integration yet. Whereas the horizontal conflict happened was between consumers, developers, and government. Those problems came from the regulation that could not accommodate the needs of these party. Beside of the lack of government which should held and responsible the socialization and understansing the society about apartment law, added by the passive Indonesian society to do research or find an information about apartment law and though that apartment law as the same as landed house law leading to the next problem of apartment law in Indonesia.Keywords : apartment law, the license, and strata title","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48046661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Indonesia’s industrial relations is called the Pancasila industrial relations, which requires a harmonic situation between the labor and the employer. On the other hand, the Pancasila industrial relations also contains the conflict concept which appears in the existence of labor strike. However, the conflict concept in the existence of labor strike is in line with the Pancasila industrial relations’ harmonic concept. The labor strike is the part of industrial relations dispute settlement, which is not to undermining the Pancasila industrial relations’ harmonic concept. The right to strike is given to the labor for increasing their bargaining power when the industrial relation dispute arises. The existence of labor strike actually become a means to restore the harmonic situation when the industrial relation dispute arises.Keywords: industrial relations, the Pancasila industrial relations, labor strikeIntisariHubungan industrial di Indonesia merupakan hubungan industrial Pancasila, yang menghendaki situasi yang harmonis antara pekerja dengan pengusaha. Di sisi lain, hubungan industrial Pancasila juga mengakomodasi konsep konflik yang tercermin dalam keberadaan mogok kerja. Keberadaan mogok kerja yang mengandung konsep konflik sejatinya tidak bertentangan dengan konsep keharmonisan dalam hubungan industrial Pancasila. Mogokkerja dihadirkan sedemikian rupa sebagai salah satu upaya penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial, tidak dimaksudkan untuk merusak tatanan keharmonisan sebagaimana dicita-citakan oleh hubungan industrial Pancasila. Hak mogok kerja diberikan kepada pekerja digunakan untuk membantu menyeimbangkan posisi tawar pekerja saat terjadi perselisihan hubungan industrial. Keberadaan mogok kerja sejatinya merupakan saranauntuk mengembalikan keharmonisan di saat terjadi konflik dan perselisihan dalam hubungan industrial.Kata kunci: hubungan industrial, hubungan industrial Pancasila, mogok kerja.
印度尼西亚的劳资关系被称为潘卡西拉劳资关系,它要求劳资双方和谐相处。另一方面,潘卡西拉劳资关系也包含着冲突的概念,这种冲突出现在罢工的存在中。然而,罢工存在的冲突概念与潘卡西拉劳资关系的和谐概念是一致的。罢工是劳资关系纠纷解决的一部分,并不是为了破坏潘卡西拉劳资关系的和谐理念。罢工权是在劳资关系发生纠纷时,为提高劳资双方的议价能力而赋予劳动者的权利。罢工的存在实际上成为劳资关系纠纷发生时恢复和谐局面的一种手段。关键词:劳资关系,劳资关系,劳资罢工,印尼,印尼,印尼,印尼,印尼,印尼,印尼,印尼Di sisi lain, hubungan industrial Pancasila juga mengakomodasi konsep konflik yang tercermin dalam keberadaan mogok kerja。Keberadaan mogok kerja yang mengandung konsep konflik sejatinya tidak bertentangan dengan konsep keharmonisan dalam hubungan industrial Pancasila。Mogokkerja dihadirkan sedemikian rupa sebagai salah satu upaya penyeleshan hubungan industrial, tidak dimaksudkan untuk merusak tatanan keharmonisan sebagaimana dicita-citakan oleh hubungan industrial Pancasila。Hak mogok kerja diberikan kepada pekerja digunakan untuk membantu menyeimbangkan posisi Hak mogok kerja saat terjadi perselishan hubungan工业。keberadan mogok kerja sejatinya merupakan saranuntuk mengbalikan keharmonisan di saat terjadi konflik dan perselisihan dalam hubungan工业。Kata kunci: hubungan industrial, hubungan industrial Pancasila, mogok kerja。
{"title":"KEBERADAAN MOGOK KERJA DALAM KONSTELASI HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL PANCASILA","authors":"Nindry Sulistya Widiastiani","doi":"10.24002/JEP.V33I2.1602","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24002/JEP.V33I2.1602","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia’s industrial relations is called the Pancasila industrial relations, which requires a harmonic situation between the labor and the employer. On the other hand, the Pancasila industrial relations also contains the conflict concept which appears in the existence of labor strike. However, the conflict concept in the existence of labor strike is in line with the Pancasila industrial relations’ harmonic concept. The labor strike is the part of industrial relations dispute settlement, which is not to undermining the Pancasila industrial relations’ harmonic concept. The right to strike is given to the labor for increasing their bargaining power when the industrial relation dispute arises. The existence of labor strike actually become a means to restore the harmonic situation when the industrial relation dispute arises.Keywords: industrial relations, the Pancasila industrial relations, labor strikeIntisariHubungan industrial di Indonesia merupakan hubungan industrial Pancasila, yang menghendaki situasi yang harmonis antara pekerja dengan pengusaha. Di sisi lain, hubungan industrial Pancasila juga mengakomodasi konsep konflik yang tercermin dalam keberadaan mogok kerja. Keberadaan mogok kerja yang mengandung konsep konflik sejatinya tidak bertentangan dengan konsep keharmonisan dalam hubungan industrial Pancasila. Mogokkerja dihadirkan sedemikian rupa sebagai salah satu upaya penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial, tidak dimaksudkan untuk merusak tatanan keharmonisan sebagaimana dicita-citakan oleh hubungan industrial Pancasila. Hak mogok kerja diberikan kepada pekerja digunakan untuk membantu menyeimbangkan posisi tawar pekerja saat terjadi perselisihan hubungan industrial. Keberadaan mogok kerja sejatinya merupakan saranauntuk mengembalikan keharmonisan di saat terjadi konflik dan perselisihan dalam hubungan industrial.Kata kunci: hubungan industrial, hubungan industrial Pancasila, mogok kerja.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41957894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The background of this article is to look at the current phenomenon of public understanding, particularly regarding today’s students’ generation who has begun to forget Pancasila values. Moral degradation of current the generation becomes a big problem in this nation, comparable to corruption, robbery, murder, until the problem of repression and violence for the sake of religion. Because of such reason, there is a need to renew and reinvestthe values of Pancasila in school institutions. This research normative legal research, namely research that employs secondary data obtained through the literature study. As stipulated in the Law No. 20 of 2003 about National Education System, particularly in regard to the elaboration of Article 37 paragraph (1) that education is meant to form the students to become a religious human being, kind-hearted and having a good ethic. The author tries to give a new color to the national education system about the valuesof Pancasila that should be actualized in the development of national education. The solution is to re-actualize the values of Pancasila. Indonesia national education should be re-motivated on the basis of Pancasila ideology, both as a state’s ideology and as the personality of the nation.Keywords: Reactualisation, Pancasila Values, National Education System.IntisariLatar belakang artikel ini adalah melihat fenomena sekarang bahwa pemahaman masyarakat umum khususnya generasi pelajar saat ini sudah mulai lupa dengan nilainilai Pancasila. Degradasi moral generasi zaman sekarang menjadi persoalan besar bangsa ini, seperti korupsi, perampokan, pembunuhan, bahkan sampai pada masalah kekerasan dan penindasan atas nama agama. Berawal dari hal demikian, perlu adanya pembaharuan penanaman kembali nilai-nilai Pancasila di instansi sekolah. Penelitianini merupakan penelitian hukum normative, yaitu penelitian terhadap data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi pustaka. Sebagaimana tertuang di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, terutama penjelasan Pasal 37 ayat (1) bahwa pendidikan dimaksudkan untuk membentuk peserta didik menjadi manusia beriman, bertakwa dan berbudi pekerti yang baik. Dari sini penulis berusaha untuk memberikan warna baru dalam sistem pendidikan nasional tentang nilainilai Pancasila yang seharusnya diaktualisasikan dalam pengembangan pendidikan nasional. Solusinya adalah mengaktualisasikan kembali nilai-nilai Pancasila. Pendidikan nasional Indonesia hendaknya harus diberi motivasi kembali atas dasar ideologis Pancasila, baik secara ideologi negara maupun kepribadian bangsa.Kata kunci: Reaktualisasi, Nilai-nilai Pancasila, Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
{"title":"REAKTUALISASI NILAI-NILAI PANCASILA DALAM SISTEM PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL","authors":"A. Saiin","doi":"10.24002/jep.v33i2.1603","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v33i2.1603","url":null,"abstract":"The background of this article is to look at the current phenomenon of public understanding, particularly regarding today’s students’ generation who has begun to forget Pancasila values. Moral degradation of current the generation becomes a big problem in this nation, comparable to corruption, robbery, murder, until the problem of repression and violence for the sake of religion. Because of such reason, there is a need to renew and reinvestthe values of Pancasila in school institutions. This research normative legal research, namely research that employs secondary data obtained through the literature study. As stipulated in the Law No. 20 of 2003 about National Education System, particularly in regard to the elaboration of Article 37 paragraph (1) that education is meant to form the students to become a religious human being, kind-hearted and having a good ethic. The author tries to give a new color to the national education system about the valuesof Pancasila that should be actualized in the development of national education. The solution is to re-actualize the values of Pancasila. Indonesia national education should be re-motivated on the basis of Pancasila ideology, both as a state’s ideology and as the personality of the nation.Keywords: Reactualisation, Pancasila Values, National Education System.IntisariLatar belakang artikel ini adalah melihat fenomena sekarang bahwa pemahaman masyarakat umum khususnya generasi pelajar saat ini sudah mulai lupa dengan nilainilai Pancasila. Degradasi moral generasi zaman sekarang menjadi persoalan besar bangsa ini, seperti korupsi, perampokan, pembunuhan, bahkan sampai pada masalah kekerasan dan penindasan atas nama agama. Berawal dari hal demikian, perlu adanya pembaharuan penanaman kembali nilai-nilai Pancasila di instansi sekolah. Penelitianini merupakan penelitian hukum normative, yaitu penelitian terhadap data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi pustaka. Sebagaimana tertuang di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, terutama penjelasan Pasal 37 ayat (1) bahwa pendidikan dimaksudkan untuk membentuk peserta didik menjadi manusia beriman, bertakwa dan berbudi pekerti yang baik. Dari sini penulis berusaha untuk memberikan warna baru dalam sistem pendidikan nasional tentang nilainilai Pancasila yang seharusnya diaktualisasikan dalam pengembangan pendidikan nasional. Solusinya adalah mengaktualisasikan kembali nilai-nilai Pancasila. Pendidikan nasional Indonesia hendaknya harus diberi motivasi kembali atas dasar ideologis Pancasila, baik secara ideologi negara maupun kepribadian bangsa.Kata kunci: Reaktualisasi, Nilai-nilai Pancasila, Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42210187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Since the emergence of Law No. 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts which states that sharia economy is an absolute authority of religious courts. When such authority becomes the jurisdiction of the religious courts, a complete codification of shari'a economic law is required so that the law has legal certainty and the judges have standard reference in solving cases of dispute in sharia business. Pancasila as a life guidance, norms fundamental staats, ground norm, and life of the Indonesian people requires that every rule under it must be based on the values that exist in Pancasila. Renewal of shari'ah economic law is a political Islam discourse that still must prioritize the existence of Pancasila values in the legislation established. The idea of enacting shari'ah economic law should promote the nationalistic tradition and pluralistic values even in its determination to adopt Islamic law.Keywords: Pancasila, syari'ah economic law, Indonesia, norms fundamental staats.
{"title":"EKSISTENSI NILAI-NILAI PANCASILA DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM EKONOMI SYARI’AH DI INDONESIA","authors":"Aprina Chintya","doi":"10.24002/JEP.V33I2.1358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24002/JEP.V33I2.1358","url":null,"abstract":"Since the emergence of Law No. 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts which states that sharia economy is an absolute authority of religious courts. When such authority becomes the jurisdiction of the religious courts, a complete codification of shari'a economic law is required so that the law has legal certainty and the judges have standard reference in solving cases of dispute in sharia business. Pancasila as a life guidance, norms fundamental staats, ground norm, and life of the Indonesian people requires that every rule under it must be based on the values that exist in Pancasila. Renewal of shari'ah economic law is a political Islam discourse that still must prioritize the existence of Pancasila values in the legislation established. The idea of enacting shari'ah economic law should promote the nationalistic tradition and pluralistic values even in its determination to adopt Islamic law.Keywords: Pancasila, syari'ah economic law, Indonesia, norms fundamental staats.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43566647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rise of globalization has a positive impact but also has a negative impact on all sectors, particularly law enforcement in Indonesia. Law enforcement practice continues without an adequate basis resulting in injustice. Efforts are needed as preventive and curative measures That is Pancasila Justice manifestation strengthening law enforcement in the contemporary era. That is normative research method with a philosophical approach, approach to the concept and approach to the case. Results obtained that law enforcement must prioritize the implementation of the noble values of Pancasila which leads to the achievement of equitable realization of the state (welfare state).Keywords : Pancasila Justice, Law Enforcement, Contemporary Era.INTISARIDerasnya arus globalisasi memiliki dampak positif namun juga memiliki dampak negatif terhadap semua sektor, khususnya penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Praktik penegakan hukum juga terus berlangsung tanpa landasan yang memadai sehingga mengakibatkan ketidakadilan. Maka diperlukan upaya sebagai langkah preventif dan kuratif yakni penguatan manifestasi Keadilan Pancasila dalam penegakan hukum di era kontemporer. Metode penelitian yakni yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan filosofis, pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil yang diperoleh bahwa penegakan hukum harus mengedepankan pelaksanaan nilai-nilai luhur Pancasila yang bermuara pada pencapaian terwujudnya negara berkeadilan (welfare state).Kata Kunci : Keadilan Pancasila, Penegakan Hukum, Era Kontemporer.1 Korespondensi
{"title":"PENGUATAN MANIFESTASI NILAI KEADILAN PANCASILA DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI ERA KONTEMPORER","authors":"C. Kristiyanti","doi":"10.24002/JEP.V33I1.1604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24002/JEP.V33I1.1604","url":null,"abstract":"Rise of globalization has a positive impact but also has a negative impact on all sectors, particularly law enforcement in Indonesia. Law enforcement practice continues without an adequate basis resulting in injustice. Efforts are needed as preventive and curative measures That is Pancasila Justice manifestation strengthening law enforcement in the contemporary era. That is normative research method with a philosophical approach, approach to the concept and approach to the case. Results obtained that law enforcement must prioritize the implementation of the noble values of Pancasila which leads to the achievement of equitable realization of the state (welfare state).Keywords : Pancasila Justice, Law Enforcement, Contemporary Era.INTISARIDerasnya arus globalisasi memiliki dampak positif namun juga memiliki dampak negatif terhadap semua sektor, khususnya penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Praktik penegakan hukum juga terus berlangsung tanpa landasan yang memadai sehingga mengakibatkan ketidakadilan. Maka diperlukan upaya sebagai langkah preventif dan kuratif yakni penguatan manifestasi Keadilan Pancasila dalam penegakan hukum di era kontemporer. Metode penelitian yakni yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan filosofis, pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil yang diperoleh bahwa penegakan hukum harus mengedepankan pelaksanaan nilai-nilai luhur Pancasila yang bermuara pada pencapaian terwujudnya negara berkeadilan (welfare state).Kata Kunci : Keadilan Pancasila, Penegakan Hukum, Era Kontemporer.1 Korespondensi","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46196939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AbstractPancasila has been placed as the “philosophical foundation” of Indonesia. That conditions, make Pancasila should be implemented and become the basis in formulating any policies related to the life of nation and state. Instead, the values of Pancasila are in fact not yet realized, especially in the field of natural resource management. This paper will identify many of these aberrations, as well as discuss the conception of the management of theideal agrarian resources according to the values contained in Pancasila.Keywords: Pancasila, Natural Resources Management, RevitalizationIntisariPancasila telah dijadikan “landasan filosofis” Indonesia. Kondisi tersebut, membuat Pancasila harus diimplementasikan dan menjadi dasar dalam merumuskan kebijakan apapun yang berkaitan dengan kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara. Meskipun demikian, nilai-nilai Pancasila sebenarnya belum terealisasi, terutama di bidang pengelolaan sumber daya agraria. Makalah ini akan mengidentifikasi banyak penyimpangan tersebut, serta membahas konsep pengelolaan sumber agraria yang ideal sesuai dengan nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam Pancasila.Kata Kunci: Pancasila, Sumber Daya Agraria, Revitalisasi
{"title":"REVITALISASI NILAI-NILAI PANCASILA DALAM PENGELOLAAN SUMBER DAYA AGRARIA DI INDONESIA","authors":"M. Alan","doi":"10.24002/JEP.V33I2.1600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24002/JEP.V33I2.1600","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractPancasila has been placed as the “philosophical foundation” of Indonesia. That conditions, make Pancasila should be implemented and become the basis in formulating any policies related to the life of nation and state. Instead, the values of Pancasila are in fact not yet realized, especially in the field of natural resource management. This paper will identify many of these aberrations, as well as discuss the conception of the management of theideal agrarian resources according to the values contained in Pancasila.Keywords: Pancasila, Natural Resources Management, RevitalizationIntisariPancasila telah dijadikan “landasan filosofis” Indonesia. Kondisi tersebut, membuat Pancasila harus diimplementasikan dan menjadi dasar dalam merumuskan kebijakan apapun yang berkaitan dengan kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara. Meskipun demikian, nilai-nilai Pancasila sebenarnya belum terealisasi, terutama di bidang pengelolaan sumber daya agraria. Makalah ini akan mengidentifikasi banyak penyimpangan tersebut, serta membahas konsep pengelolaan sumber agraria yang ideal sesuai dengan nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam Pancasila.Kata Kunci: Pancasila, Sumber Daya Agraria, Revitalisasi","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48301593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AbstractViolence against children is a violation of children's rights, especially if the abuser is the child's own parents, this is called domestic violence. The government had ratified legislation governing child rights and protection of children in Indonesia with sanctions for perpetrators who violate, but sanctions are more focused on criminal sanctions, when in fact it could be the imposition of civil penalties by filing a compensation lawsuit against the perpetrators based on Article 1365 of the Code of Civil Law concerning unlawful act that is broadly defined, not only violate the law but also violated decency and public order.Keywords: Violence, Children, VictimsIntisariKekerasan pada anak merupakan pelanggaran hak anak, apalagi jika pelaku kekerasan ini adalah orang tua anak itu sendiri, hal ini disebut kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Pemerintah sudah mengesahkan peraturan tentang hak-hak anak dan perlindungan bagi anak di Indonesia dengan adanya sanksi bagi pelaku yang melanggar, namun sanksinya lebih berfokus pada sanksi pidana, padahal sebenarnya bisa juga sanksi perdata dengan mengajukan gugatan ganti rugi pada pelaku berdasarkan Pasal 1365 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata tentang perbuatan melawan hukum yang diartikan secara luas, tidak hanya melanggar undang-undang namun juga melanggar kesusilaan dan ketertiban umum.Kata Kunci : Kekerasan, Anak, Korban
{"title":"TINJAUAN NORMATIF TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA","authors":"D. Mayasari","doi":"10.24002/JEP.V33I2.1222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24002/JEP.V33I2.1222","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractViolence against children is a violation of children's rights, especially if the abuser is the child's own parents, this is called domestic violence. The government had ratified legislation governing child rights and protection of children in Indonesia with sanctions for perpetrators who violate, but sanctions are more focused on criminal sanctions, when in fact it could be the imposition of civil penalties by filing a compensation lawsuit against the perpetrators based on Article 1365 of the Code of Civil Law concerning unlawful act that is broadly defined, not only violate the law but also violated decency and public order.Keywords: Violence, Children, VictimsIntisariKekerasan pada anak merupakan pelanggaran hak anak, apalagi jika pelaku kekerasan ini adalah orang tua anak itu sendiri, hal ini disebut kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Pemerintah sudah mengesahkan peraturan tentang hak-hak anak dan perlindungan bagi anak di Indonesia dengan adanya sanksi bagi pelaku yang melanggar, namun sanksinya lebih berfokus pada sanksi pidana, padahal sebenarnya bisa juga sanksi perdata dengan mengajukan gugatan ganti rugi pada pelaku berdasarkan Pasal 1365 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata tentang perbuatan melawan hukum yang diartikan secara luas, tidak hanya melanggar undang-undang namun juga melanggar kesusilaan dan ketertiban umum.Kata Kunci : Kekerasan, Anak, Korban","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43306166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}