<p>Among people in treatment for alcohol dependence, the severity of withdrawal symptoms during early alcohol abstinence may be affected by the life adversity they have experienced, a small study suggests. “Cumulative adversity” is the sum of an individual's challenging and traumatic life circumstances. This chronic wear and tear is associated with a range of health outcomes—including substance use disorders, where the effects of stress are known to underpin craving and relapse. Early abstinence is associated with shifts in mood, anxiety, sleep patterns, cardiovascular function, and other physiological processes. While acute alcohol withdrawal is well understood, early abstinence symptoms and their impact on treatment are not, and they may be key to clinical outcomes.</p><p>For the study in <i>Alcohol: Clinical & Experimental Research</i>, investigators worked with data from 34 participants undergoing inpatient alcohol treatment, categorized into high-adversity and low-adversity groups, and 38 light social drinkers (controls). They examined cravings, withdrawal symptoms, mood, and cardiovascular measures during the patients' initial three to four weeks of abstinence, and assessed whether cumulative adversity influenced the severity and trajectory of their withdrawal.</p><p>When admitted to treatment, the high-adversity patients reported, among other adverse circumstances, an average of 15.2 traumatic life events, compared to 6.1 in low-adversity patients and 5.3 in controls. Those with higher cumulative adversity had more severe abstinence symptoms (on all measures) compared with the control group, and (on most measures) compared with the low-adversity participants. The high-adversity patients reported more anger/hostility, fatigue/inertia, confusion/bewilderment, and withdrawal symptoms than those with lower adversity, even after accounting for recent alcohol and tobacco use, and began treatment with more intense alcohol cravings. Although these heightened symptoms resolved, they may be important indicators of clinical outcomes, including relapse, dropping out of treatment, and medication effectiveness. Cardiovascular measures were within the normal range for both patient groups. However, differences included a slightly elevated and persistent heart rate pattern among the high-adversity participants compared to the low-adversity group. This, too, may flag greater vulnerability to craving and relapse.</p><p>The findings suggest that cumulative adversity may influence individual responses to starting alcohol abstinence, contributing to a combination of symptoms that may be associated with outcomes. Cumulative adversity and tracking early abstinence symptoms may therefore help inform personalized treatment approaches for alcohol use disorder. Traumatic stress may have a particularly disruptive impact, underlining the importance of addressing trauma early in recovery. Additional research is needed.</p><p>Early alcohol abstinence symptoms and the
一项小型研究表明,在接受酒精依赖治疗的人群中,早期戒酒期间戒断症状的严重程度可能受到他们所经历的生活逆境的影响。“累积逆境”是一个人的挑战和创伤性生活环境的总和。这种慢性磨损与一系列健康结果有关,包括物质使用障碍,其中压力的影响是已知的渴望和复发的基础。早期禁欲与情绪、焦虑、睡眠模式、心血管功能和其他生理过程的变化有关。虽然急性戒酒很容易理解,但早期戒酒症状及其对治疗的影响尚不清楚,它们可能是临床结果的关键。在《酒精:临床与实验研究》的研究中,研究人员处理了34名接受住院酒精治疗的参与者的数据,他们被分为高逆境组和低逆境组,还有38名轻度社交饮酒者(对照组)。他们检查了患者最初三到四周戒断期间的渴望、戒断症状、情绪和心血管测量,并评估了累积的逆境是否影响了他们戒断的严重程度和轨迹。当接受治疗时,在其他不利情况下,高逆境患者报告平均15.2次创伤性生活事件,而低逆境患者为6.1次,对照组为5.3次。与对照组和(在大多数测量中)与低逆境的参与者相比,那些经历了较高累积逆境的参与者有更严重的戒断症状(在所有测量中)。高逆境患者比低逆境患者报告更多的愤怒/敌意、疲劳/惰性、困惑/困惑和戒断症状,即使考虑到最近的酒精和烟草使用情况,并且开始治疗时更强烈的酒精渴望。虽然这些加重的症状得到了缓解,但它们可能是临床结果的重要指标,包括复发、退出治疗和药物有效性。两组患者的心血管指标均在正常范围内。然而,与低逆境组相比,高逆境组参与者的心率模式略有升高和持续。这也可能标志着更容易上瘾和复发。研究结果表明,累积的逆境可能会影响个体对开始戒酒的反应,导致可能与结果相关的症状组合。因此,累积逆境和追踪早期戒酒症状可能有助于为酒精使用障碍的个性化治疗方法提供信息。创伤性压力可能具有特别的破坏性影响,强调了在恢复早期处理创伤的重要性。还需要进一步的研究。早期戒酒症状与逆境累积的作用。H. C. Fox, J. Alcina, S. M. Hyman, V. Milivojevic, R. Sinha。(https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70137).Changing根据一项新的研究,大麻的使用频率可以预测年轻人酗酒频率的变化,该研究阐明了成年早期物质使用的变化。这一发现意味着有针对性地干预预防和治疗酗酒的机会,这种行为与一系列负面后果有关,包括酒精使用障碍(AUD)和高经济成本。这些年来更频繁地使用大麻与危险的饮酒结果有关。其中包括酗酒(女性一次喝4杯以上,男性一次喝5杯以上),这种情况往往在成年初期达到顶峰。大多数涉及使用这两种物质的年轻人的研究都侧重于广泛的酒精使用,而不是专门的酗酒。在《酒精:临床与实验研究》杂志上的这项研究中,美国调查人员对526名年轻人进行了研究,这些年轻人被招募参加一项长期药物使用研究。参与者平均每月酗酒1.3次,平均每月使用大麻5.2次。在整个小组中——一种检查参与者之间差异的方法——使用大麻的频率与酗酒的频率一致。当一个增加时,另一个也会增加。同样,追踪个人体内的物质使用情况,大麻使用频率的增加预示着18至22岁之间酗酒频率的增加。然而,在24-25岁的人群中,吸食大麻的频率越高,酗酒的频率就越低。在那些酗酒变得更频繁的人中,它并不能预测大麻使用频率的增加。25岁左右的这种转变可能反映了生活方式的重大变化和药物使用动机的演变。 他们进行了一系列的实验来评估不同药物,特别是纳曲酮、阿坎普罗酸和托吡酯对果蝇运动技能、酒精消耗和酒精相关记忆的影响。在之前的研究中,这些药物已经被证明可以减少人类的酒精消费或偏好。实验表明,纳曲酮和阿坎普罗酸都是fda批准用于治疗酒精使用障碍的药物,它们通过调节寻求和消费酒精的动机,减少了果蝇对酒精的偏好。这些结果与先前的研究一致,并验证了果蝇作为表征药物机制的有效模式生物的使用。在这个模型中,托吡酯没有影响酒精消耗,这可能是因为托吡酯减少了戒断症状,而本研究中的果蝇没有表现出戒断症状。另外的实验发现,两种γ-分泌酶抑制剂,二苯二氮平和化合物E,都能有效地减少果蝇对酒精的条件偏好,可能是通过改变对酒精有益特性的记忆。这类药物目前被批准用于治疗一种罕见的癌症,并正在积极探索用于治疗阿尔茨海默病。这些发现表明,果蝇模型是确定酒精使用障碍的新药物治疗的理想选择。用黑腹果蝇研究酒精使用障碍的药物治疗。R. Oramas, Y. Jaques, N. D'Silva, R. Azanchi, J. McGeary, K. Kaun。(https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70146)。
{"title":"Articles of Public Interest","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/acer.70182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70182","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Among people in treatment for alcohol dependence, the severity of withdrawal symptoms during early alcohol abstinence may be affected by the life adversity they have experienced, a small study suggests. “Cumulative adversity” is the sum of an individual's challenging and traumatic life circumstances. This chronic wear and tear is associated with a range of health outcomes—including substance use disorders, where the effects of stress are known to underpin craving and relapse. Early abstinence is associated with shifts in mood, anxiety, sleep patterns, cardiovascular function, and other physiological processes. While acute alcohol withdrawal is well understood, early abstinence symptoms and their impact on treatment are not, and they may be key to clinical outcomes.</p><p>For the study in <i>Alcohol: Clinical & Experimental Research</i>, investigators worked with data from 34 participants undergoing inpatient alcohol treatment, categorized into high-adversity and low-adversity groups, and 38 light social drinkers (controls). They examined cravings, withdrawal symptoms, mood, and cardiovascular measures during the patients' initial three to four weeks of abstinence, and assessed whether cumulative adversity influenced the severity and trajectory of their withdrawal.</p><p>When admitted to treatment, the high-adversity patients reported, among other adverse circumstances, an average of 15.2 traumatic life events, compared to 6.1 in low-adversity patients and 5.3 in controls. Those with higher cumulative adversity had more severe abstinence symptoms (on all measures) compared with the control group, and (on most measures) compared with the low-adversity participants. The high-adversity patients reported more anger/hostility, fatigue/inertia, confusion/bewilderment, and withdrawal symptoms than those with lower adversity, even after accounting for recent alcohol and tobacco use, and began treatment with more intense alcohol cravings. Although these heightened symptoms resolved, they may be important indicators of clinical outcomes, including relapse, dropping out of treatment, and medication effectiveness. Cardiovascular measures were within the normal range for both patient groups. However, differences included a slightly elevated and persistent heart rate pattern among the high-adversity participants compared to the low-adversity group. This, too, may flag greater vulnerability to craving and relapse.</p><p>The findings suggest that cumulative adversity may influence individual responses to starting alcohol abstinence, contributing to a combination of symptoms that may be associated with outcomes. Cumulative adversity and tracking early abstinence symptoms may therefore help inform personalized treatment approaches for alcohol use disorder. Traumatic stress may have a particularly disruptive impact, underlining the importance of addressing trauma early in recovery. Additional research is needed.</p><p>Early alcohol abstinence symptoms and the","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70182","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145284596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Medication development for alcohol use disorder (AUD) represents a challenging, costly, and time-consuming process. A typical development trajectory involves testing compounds in animal models, human laboratory studies, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This paper reviews a series of data-driven studies seeking to evaluate best practices in medication development for AUD at each of the three levels of analysis. First, we evaluate the role of behavioral pharmacology paradigms in early efficacy testing and highlight the importance of preclinical and human laboratory evidence in making critical “go/no-go” decisions throughout the development process. Second, we discuss a recent translational meta-analytic approach that integrates preclinical, human laboratory, and RCT data to inform AUD medication development. This narrative review synthesizes findings from systematic reviews, meta-regression analyses, and integrated data across stages of medication testing. Findings from this work suggest that factors such as sample characteristics and study design influence the detection of medication effects on AUD outcomes, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies. Furthermore, findings suggest that early efficacy signals in animal models and human laboratory studies can predict specific clinical trial outcomes, offering valuable insights for data-informed decision making in medication development. Together, these studies bridge the gap between the preclinical and clinical stages, facilitating more efficient medication development for AUD.
{"title":"Advancing medication development for alcohol use disorder: A narrative review integrating preclinical, human laboratory, and clinical trials","authors":"Steven J. Nieto, Lara A. Ray","doi":"10.1111/acer.70181","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acer.70181","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Medication development for alcohol use disorder (AUD) represents a challenging, costly, and time-consuming process. A typical development trajectory involves testing compounds in animal models, human laboratory studies, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This paper reviews a series of data-driven studies seeking to evaluate best practices in medication development for AUD at each of the three levels of analysis. First, we evaluate the role of behavioral pharmacology paradigms in early efficacy testing and highlight the importance of preclinical and human laboratory evidence in making critical “go/no-go” decisions throughout the development process. Second, we discuss a recent translational meta-analytic approach that integrates preclinical, human laboratory, and RCT data to inform AUD medication development. This narrative review synthesizes findings from systematic reviews, meta-regression analyses, and integrated data across stages of medication testing. Findings from this work suggest that factors such as sample characteristics and study design influence the detection of medication effects on AUD outcomes, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies. Furthermore, findings suggest that early efficacy signals in animal models and human laboratory studies can predict specific clinical trial outcomes, offering valuable insights for data-informed decision making in medication development. Together, these studies bridge the gap between the preclinical and clinical stages, facilitating more efficient medication development for AUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 12","pages":"2649-2659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145287898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}