Background: Dermatophytosis caused by Nannizzia gypsea are considered rare. The clinical picture is indistinguishable from that produced by other dermatophytes, but, being this a geophilic fungus, it can cause more inflammatory disease.
Methods: Retrospective study. Patients with positive culture for N. gypsea observed at the Dermatological Institute of Jalisco "Dr. José Barba Rubio", from 2001 to 2023, were included. Frequency, sex, age, evolution, and clinical variant were investigated. We compared the findings between the pediatric versus adult population. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used.
Results: Over 23 years, 155 patients were diagnosed (6.7 cases per year). Female sex predominated (53.5%). The median age was 9 years (minimum 1year and maximum 85 years), the more affected age group was 1-10 years (54.2%). The median time of evolution was 30 days (minimum one day and maximum three years), and 74.8% had an evolution ≤30 days. Tinea capitis predominated in pediatric patients (41.0%, p<0.01) whereas tinea corporis predominated in adults (72.7%, p<0.01). Inflammatory tinea was more prevalent in the pediatric population (21.0% vs. 3.6%, p<0.01).
Conclusion: The ability of Nannizzia gypsea to cause inflammatory tinea was observed primarily in pediatric patients. Since there is no clinical data to suspect this fungus, it will always be necessary to carry out a mycological study to identify the species and to implement the appropriate treatment.
Introduction: For the microbiological diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia, it is essential to use automated blood culture systems that guarantee good performance in the detection of microorganisms. We evaluated the BT24 system for blood cultures by comparing it with the BACTEC™ FX system in detection of positive spiked blood cultures (BC) and bottles, subsequent growth of the microorganism, and time to detection (TTD).
Methods: The parallel analysis of both systems was performed with 160 strains of 31 different species, each inoculated under the same conditions and simultaneously in six blood culture bottles. The Chi-square test was used for comparison per BC and per bottle detection. Wilconxon test and Student's t-test were used for comparison of TTDs.
Results: Overall, the following BC (aerobic bottle+anaerobic bottle) were detected as positive: 160/160 (100%) in BACTEC FX and 158/160 (98.7%) in BT24 (P=.31). Furthermore, the following pediatric blood cultures (1 single bottle, aerobic) were also detected: 159/160 (99.4%) in BACTEC FX and 156/160 (97.5%) in BT24 (P=.17). TTDs were longer with BT24 system than with BACTEC FX system, especially for Staphylococcus aureus strains.
Conclusions: We consider the BT24 system with good performance and specificity comparable to the reference system, but inferior in TTD.
Objetive: To identify and analyze the resources and costs associated with the administration of intramuscular antiretroviral therapy (ART) cabotegravir+rilpivirine (CAB+RPV) compared to oral ART in the management of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) infection in Spain.
Methods: An economic model was developed to identify resources and analyze costs from the perspective of the National Health System (NHS) and societal, associated with the administration of intramuscular ART (CAB+RPV) compared to oral ART over a two-year time horizon. Costs included treatment change monitoring, pharmaceutical dispensation, administration, management of adverse events to injection-site reactions (AEs-ISR), travel to the hospital, telepharmacy service, and lost work productivity. Unit costs (€, 2023) were obtained from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model.
Results: Intramuscular ART compared to oral ART was associated with an increase in costs of €673.16/patient over two years from the perspective of the NHS, and €719.59/patient from the social perspective. Intramuscular ART would generate increased costs for dispensation (+€97.75), administration (+€394.55), monitoring (+€288.74), management of AEs-ISR (+€6.46), travel (+€8.36), and lost work productivity (+€38.07), compared to oral ART administration.
Conclusion: Treating HIV-1 with intramuscular CAB+RPV leads to increased resource consumption and costs, compared to oral ART.