Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2025.02.016
Marta Santos , Jesica Martín Carmona , Anais Corma-Gómez , Margarita Pérez-García , Carmen Martín-Sierra , Pilar Rincón-Mayo , Juan Antonio Pineda , Luis Miguel Real , Juan Macías
Introduction
The WHO proposed to achieve hepatitis B virus (HBV) elimination by 2030, but this goal is very difficult to attain. People living with HIV (PLWH) may represent a subset where microelimination can be reached sooner. This study aimed to assess the incidence of HBV infections and changes in the prevalence of active HBV infection among PLWH in Spain.
Methods
A prospective cohort study, including all PLWH attending a university hospital in Southern Spain from January 2011 to December 2022, was conducted. Serum HBV markers (HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc) were tested at baseline and at least yearly afterwards. Incident cases were identified by anti-HBc seroconversion.
Results
Nine hundred and eighty PLWH were included. At the beginning of the study, 26 (2.7% [95% CI: 1.7–3.8%]) tested positive for HBsAg, 428 (43.7% [95% CI: 42.8–49.4%]) for anti-HBc and 386 (39.4% [95% CI: 39.8–46.3%]) for anti-HBs. After a median (Q1–Q3) follow-up of 115 (35–143) months, two new infections were documented, yielding an incidence rate of 2.24 (95% CI: 0.27–8.1)/100,000 person-years. The prevalence of active HBV infection declined from 3.4% [95% CI: 2.0–5.0%] in 2011 to 2% [95% CI: 1.0–3.0%] in 2022 (p for linear trend = 0.027). At the end of the study, 167 (24%) PLWH still were susceptible to HBV.
Conclusions
The incidence of HBV infection among PLWH in Spain is close to the WHO target. The prevalence of active HBV infection has decreased substantially during the last 12 years. These data suggest that micro-elimination of HBV/HIV infection is on the track in Spain.
{"title":"Progression towards microelimination of hepatitis B virus infection among people living with HIV in Spain","authors":"Marta Santos , Jesica Martín Carmona , Anais Corma-Gómez , Margarita Pérez-García , Carmen Martín-Sierra , Pilar Rincón-Mayo , Juan Antonio Pineda , Luis Miguel Real , Juan Macías","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.02.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.02.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The WHO proposed to achieve hepatitis B virus (HBV) elimination by 2030, but this goal is very difficult to attain. People living with HIV (PLWH) may represent a subset where microelimination can be reached sooner. This study aimed to assess the incidence of HBV infections and changes in the prevalence of active HBV infection among PLWH in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective cohort study, including all PLWH attending a university hospital in Southern Spain from January 2011 to December 2022, was conducted. Serum HBV markers (HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc) were tested at baseline and at least yearly afterwards. Incident cases were identified by anti-HBc seroconversion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine hundred and eighty PLWH were included. At the beginning of the study, 26 (2.7% [95% CI: 1.7–3.8%]) tested positive for HBsAg, 428 (43.7% [95% CI: 42.8–49.4%]) for anti-HBc and 386 (39.4% [95% CI: 39.8–46.3%]) for anti-HBs. After a median (Q1–Q3) follow-up of 115 (35–143) months, two new infections were documented, yielding an incidence rate of 2.24 (95% CI: 0.27–8.1)/100,000 person-years. The prevalence of active HBV infection declined from 3.4% [95% CI: 2.0–5.0%] in 2011 to 2% [95% CI: 1.0–3.0%] in 2022 (<em>p</em> for linear trend<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.027). At the end of the study, 167 (24%) PLWH still were susceptible to HBV.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The incidence of HBV infection among PLWH in Spain is close to the WHO target. The prevalence of active HBV infection has decreased substantially during the last 12 years. These data suggest that micro-elimination of HBV/HIV infection is on the track in Spain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"43 9","pages":"Pages 577-584"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144227846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2025.05.010
Itziar Diego-Yagüe , Antonio Ramos-Martinez , Jorge Calderón-Parra
{"title":"More on endocarditis risk scores in gram positive bacteremias: Caveats to their implantation in clinical practice","authors":"Itziar Diego-Yagüe , Antonio Ramos-Martinez , Jorge Calderón-Parra","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.05.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.05.010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"43 9","pages":"Pages 547-549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145412608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2025.06.007
Begoña Fachal Bugarín, Lucía Ramos Merino, Joaquín Manuel Serrano Arreba, Alicia Alonso Álvarez, Ramón María Fernández Varela, Berta Pernas Souto, Laura Gutiérrez Fernández, María Dolores Sousa Regueiro, Enrique Míguez Rey, Efrén Sánchez Vidal
Introduction
Most infections caused by Listeria monocytogenes occur in individuals with predisposing conditions, such as advanced age or the use of immunosuppressive therapies, and primarily manifest as bacteremia or meningoencephalitis. Osteoarticular infections are uncommon and typically affect joint prostheses, with late-onset infections following surgery. Treatment in these cases should include antibiotic therapy along with a surgical strategy, which generally involves the removal of the affected prosthesis.
Methods
Two cases of prosthetic joint infection caused by L. monocytogenes are presented, along with a narrative review of the English and Spanish literature via PubMed up to December 2024.
Results
To the best of our knowledge, 52 cases of prosthetic joint infection caused by L. monocytogenes have been reported since 2000. All patients had predisposing conditions, with advanced age being the most common (mean age of 71 years). Most cases were late infections following surgery. Combined treatment (antibiotic therapy and surgery) was used in two-thirds of cases. The prognosis was favorable in almost all instances.
Discussion
It is important to consider L. monocytogenes in the etiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections, especially in elderly or immunocompromised patients. While the most used antibiotics have been ampicillin and cotrimoxazole, oxazolidinones could serve as an oral alternative for the treatment of these infections.
{"title":"Listeria monocytogenes prosthetic joint infection: Two clinical cases and a review of the literature","authors":"Begoña Fachal Bugarín, Lucía Ramos Merino, Joaquín Manuel Serrano Arreba, Alicia Alonso Álvarez, Ramón María Fernández Varela, Berta Pernas Souto, Laura Gutiérrez Fernández, María Dolores Sousa Regueiro, Enrique Míguez Rey, Efrén Sánchez Vidal","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.06.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Most infections caused by <span><span>Listeria monocytogenes</span></span><span><span> occur in individuals with predisposing conditions, such as advanced age or the use of immunosuppressive therapies, and primarily manifest as </span>bacteremia<span> or meningoencephalitis. Osteoarticular infections are uncommon and typically affect joint prostheses, with late-onset infections following surgery. Treatment in these cases should include antibiotic therapy along with a surgical strategy, which generally involves the removal of the affected prosthesis.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two cases of prosthetic joint infection caused by <em>L. monocytogenes</em> are presented, along with a narrative review of the English and Spanish literature via PubMed up to December 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>To the best of our knowledge, 52 cases of prosthetic joint infection caused by <em>L. monocytogenes</em> have been reported since 2000. All patients had predisposing conditions, with advanced age being the most common (mean age of 71 years). Most cases were late infections following surgery. Combined treatment (antibiotic therapy and surgery) was used in two-thirds of cases. The prognosis was favorable in almost all instances.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>It is important to consider <em>L. monocytogenes</em><span><span><span> in the etiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections, especially in elderly or immunocompromised patients. While the most used antibiotics have been </span>ampicillin<span> and cotrimoxazole, </span></span>oxazolidinones could serve as an oral alternative for the treatment of these infections.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"43 9","pages":"Pages 591-595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144531394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.016
Fabrizio Maggi , Daniele Focosi
{"title":"Anelloviruses as a marker of immunosuppression and inflammation in different clinical settings","authors":"Fabrizio Maggi , Daniele Focosi","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"43 9","pages":"Pages 552-554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145412609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.004
Antoni Noguera-Julian , Cristina Latre , Montserrat Ruiz , Carmen Garcia-Rebollo , Milena Peraita , Clàudia Fortuny
Introduction
Tuberculosis infection (TBI) in adolescents carries a high risk of progression to tuberculosis disease, yet treatment adherence remains a challenge.
Methods
Case series description.
Results
We describe a real-world experience of implementing a 12-dose weekly regimen of isoniazid (INH) and rifapentine (RPT) under video-observed therapy (VOT) in four adolescent diagnosed with TBI in a contact tracing study. This approach was chosen due to logistical and adherence concerns that made daily regimens and directly observed therapy (DOT) unfeasible. RPT was requested as a foreign medication and approved within three weeks. All patients completed treatment with 100% adherence and good tolerance.
Conclusions
Our experience supports the feasibility, tolerability, and high adherence of VOT-based weekly INH-RPT regimens in adolescents, despite regulatory barriers limiting RPT access in Europe. Broader availability of RPT and innovative adherence strategies like VOT are urgently needed to optimize TB preventive treatment in this age group.
{"title":"Rifapentine-based treatment of tuberculosis infection in Spanish adolescents","authors":"Antoni Noguera-Julian , Cristina Latre , Montserrat Ruiz , Carmen Garcia-Rebollo , Milena Peraita , Clàudia Fortuny","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Tuberculosis infection (TBI) in adolescents carries a high risk of progression to tuberculosis disease, yet treatment adherence remains a challenge.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Case series description.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We describe a real-world experience of implementing a 12-dose weekly regimen of isoniazid (INH) and rifapentine (RPT) under video-observed therapy (VOT) in four adolescent diagnosed with TBI in a contact tracing study. This approach was chosen due to logistical and adherence concerns that made daily regimens and directly observed therapy (DOT) unfeasible. RPT was requested as a foreign medication and approved within three weeks. All patients completed treatment with 100% adherence and good tolerance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our experience supports the feasibility, tolerability, and high adherence of VOT-based weekly INH-RPT regimens in adolescents, despite regulatory barriers limiting RPT access in Europe. Broader availability of RPT and innovative adherence strategies like VOT are urgently needed to optimize TB preventive treatment in this age group.</div><div>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"43 9","pages":"Pages 607-610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145420107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2025.07.005
María Velasco , María-Delmans Flores-Chávez , Jara Llenas-García , Magdalena García Rodríguez , Elisa García Vázquez , Francisco López-Medrano , Oscar Len , Juliana Esperalba Esquerra , Ángela Martínez Pérez , Marta Díaz-Menéndez , Zaira Moure García , Ana Pérez Ayala , Azucena Rodríguez Guardado , Adaia Albasanz Puig , Marina Alguacil , Míriam J. Álvarez-Martínez , Marta Arsuaga Vicente , Moncef Belhassen Garcia , María José Buitrago , Eva Calabuig , Elena Sulleiro Igual
The increase in global mobility has led to a higher prevalence of imported diseases in immunocompromised patients, often asymptomatic but with the potential for reactivation or severe progression. This executive summary presents the key recommendations of the consensus document developed by the Imported Pathology Study Group (GEPI-SEIMC) in collaboration with GeSIDA, GESITRA and GEIRAS (SEIMC), targeting healthcare professionals who manage immunocompromised individuals. Based on a structured narrative review, the document proposes systematic screening strategies to detect imported infections during their asymptomatic phase, clearly distinguishing them from the clinical approach in symptomatic patients. Major infections of concern are summarized. Specific guidance is provided for people living with HIV, donors and transplant recipients, oncohematologic patients, and those receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Differences in reactivation risk, preferred diagnostic methods, and therapeutic decisions in cases of latent infection are highlighted. The document underscores the need to incorporate screening into pre-treatment and pre-transplant assessments, promoting standardized protocols.
{"title":"Executive summary of the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC: GEPI, GeSIDA, GESITRA-IC, GEIRAS) on screening for imported infectious diseases in immunocompromised patients","authors":"María Velasco , María-Delmans Flores-Chávez , Jara Llenas-García , Magdalena García Rodríguez , Elisa García Vázquez , Francisco López-Medrano , Oscar Len , Juliana Esperalba Esquerra , Ángela Martínez Pérez , Marta Díaz-Menéndez , Zaira Moure García , Ana Pérez Ayala , Azucena Rodríguez Guardado , Adaia Albasanz Puig , Marina Alguacil , Míriam J. Álvarez-Martínez , Marta Arsuaga Vicente , Moncef Belhassen Garcia , María José Buitrago , Eva Calabuig , Elena Sulleiro Igual","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increase in global mobility has led to a higher prevalence of imported diseases in immunocompromised patients, often asymptomatic but with the potential for reactivation or severe progression. This executive summary presents the key recommendations of the consensus document developed by the Imported Pathology Study Group (GEPI-SEIMC) in collaboration with GeSIDA, GESITRA and GEIRAS (SEIMC), targeting healthcare professionals who manage immunocompromised individuals. Based on a structured narrative review, the document proposes systematic screening strategies to detect imported infections during their asymptomatic phase, clearly distinguishing them from the clinical approach in symptomatic patients. Major infections of concern are summarized. Specific guidance is provided for people living with HIV, donors and transplant recipients, oncohematologic patients, and those receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Differences in reactivation risk, preferred diagnostic methods, and therapeutic decisions in cases of latent infection are highlighted. The document underscores the need to incorporate screening into pre-treatment and pre-transplant assessments, promoting standardized protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"43 9","pages":"Pages 611-615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145420108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2024.12.015
Pedro Manuel García-Ceberino , Francisco Anguita-Santos , Jara Llenas-García , Miguel Ángel Montero-Alonso , Natalia Chueca-Porcuna , Emilio Borrajo , Adolfo de Salazar , Ana María Hernández-Campillo , Emilio Guirao-Arrabal , Andrés Ruiz-Sancho
Introduction
Bacteremia caused by gram-positive cocci (GPC) remains challenging, particularly in assessing the risk of infective endocarditis (IE). Various scoring systems have been developed to guide the use of echocardiography. The HANDOC score was specifically designed for non-β-hemolytic streptococci (NBHS). This study aimed to validate the HANDOC score in a cohort across diverse geographic settings.
Methods
A retrospective study enrolled patients with NBHS bacteremia from 2017 to 2021 at two Spanish hospitals. Cases of IE were defined according to European Society of Cardiology 2015 modified Duke criteria. Patient characteristics were extracted from medical records for the analysis of HANDOC score validation in our cohort.
Results
Among 280 patients diagnosed with NBHS bacteremia, 31 met the modified Duke criteria for infective endocarditis (11.1%). Using a cutoff of ≥3, the HANDOC score demonstrated a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 74% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The same metrics were analyzed with an adapted score based on positive blood culture vials, yielding similar results. Time to positivity (TTP) was analyzed with different cutoffs or by each NBHS group showing no statistically significant difference.
Conclusions
The HANDOC score is a valuable tool for decision-making in NBHS bacteriemia in a Spanish cohort. Scoring by vials may be employed for blood culture item in different clinical settings. Time-to-positivity did not show a significant difference that would justify its potential inclusion in the score.
{"title":"External validation of the HANDOC score in a Spanish cohort—Analysis of blood culture scoring and time to positivity","authors":"Pedro Manuel García-Ceberino , Francisco Anguita-Santos , Jara Llenas-García , Miguel Ángel Montero-Alonso , Natalia Chueca-Porcuna , Emilio Borrajo , Adolfo de Salazar , Ana María Hernández-Campillo , Emilio Guirao-Arrabal , Andrés Ruiz-Sancho","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2024.12.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eimce.2024.12.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Bacteremia caused by gram-positive cocci (GPC) remains challenging, particularly in assessing the risk of infective endocarditis (IE). Various scoring systems have been developed to guide the use of echocardiography. The HANDOC score was specifically designed for non-β-hemolytic streptococci (NBHS). This study aimed to validate the HANDOC score in a cohort across diverse geographic settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study enrolled patients with NBHS bacteremia from 2017 to 2021 at two Spanish hospitals. Cases of IE were defined according to European Society of Cardiology 2015 modified Duke criteria. Patient characteristics were extracted from medical records for the analysis of HANDOC score validation in our cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 280 patients diagnosed with NBHS bacteremia, 31 met the modified Duke criteria for infective endocarditis (11.1%). Using a cutoff of ≥3, the HANDOC score demonstrated a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 74% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The same metrics were analyzed with an adapted score based on positive blood culture vials, yielding similar results. Time to positivity (TTP) was analyzed with different cutoffs or by each NBHS group showing no statistically significant difference.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The HANDOC score is a valuable tool for decision-making in NBHS bacteriemia in a Spanish cohort. Scoring by vials may be employed for blood culture item in different clinical settings. Time-to-positivity did not show a significant difference that would justify its potential inclusion in the score.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"43 9","pages":"Pages 555-562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144133242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2025.05.003
David Durand , Joaquim Ruíz , Theresa J. Ochoa
Introduction
Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) is a pathotype of diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC) that causes acute and persistent diarrhoea in children, HIV-infected patients and travelers. However, EAEC can also be isolated in people without diarrhoea. The aim of this study was to evaluated if the EAEC bacterial load in stool samples is associated with diarrhoea in comparison with asymptomatic infection.
Methods
We selected 165 stool samples (children with diarrhoea: 80 and asymptomatic children: 85) that previously were identified as EAEC by Real-Time PCR for diagnostic of DEC from E. coli isolated from stool cultures. We extracted DNA from fecal samples using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method and standardised a qPCR to evaluate the bacterial load using EAEC strain 042.
Results
The detection limit of the qPCR was 10 copies ofaggR gene (5 bacterias)/mg stool and the reaction efficiency was ≥ 93%. We found a higher bacterial load in patients with diarrhoea [2781, 95% CI (688−6875) bacteria/mg feces] than in asymptomatic children [138, 95% CI (75−306) bacteria/mg feces], including samples with single pathogen infection and co-infections. Among diarrheal samples, the bacterial load was higher in boys than girls and in children older than 18 months than younger.
Conclusions
EAEC load in stool samples are higher in children with diarrhoea than in asymptomatic infection. This qPCR could be useful for studying the role of colonisation in children living in endemic areas where the isolation of this pathogen is similar in both groups.
{"title":"Bacterial load comparison of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) by real-time PCR (qPCR) between children with diarrhea and asymptomatic infection","authors":"David Durand , Joaquim Ruíz , Theresa J. Ochoa","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.05.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Enteroaggregative <em>Escherichia coli</em><span> (EAEC) is a pathotype of diarrheagenic </span><em>E. coli</em><span><span> (DEC) that causes acute and persistent diarrhoea in children, HIV-infected patients and travelers. However, EAEC can also be isolated in people without diarrhoea. The aim of this study was to evaluated if the EAEC bacterial load in stool samples is associated with diarrhoea in comparison with </span>asymptomatic infection.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We selected 165 stool samples (children with diarrhoea: 80 and asymptomatic children: 85) that previously were identified as EAEC by Real-Time PCR for diagnostic of DEC from <em>E. coli</em><span><span> isolated from stool cultures. We extracted DNA from fecal samples using the </span>cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method and standardised a qPCR to evaluate the bacterial load using EAEC strain 042.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>The detection limit of the qPCR was 10 copies of</span><em>aggR</em><span> gene (5 bacterias)/mg stool and the reaction efficiency was ≥ 93%. We found a higher bacterial load in patients with diarrhoea [2781, 95% CI (688−6875) bacteria/mg feces] than in asymptomatic children [138, 95% CI (75−306) bacteria/mg feces], including samples with single pathogen infection and co-infections. Among diarrheal samples, the bacterial load was higher in boys than girls and in children older than 18 months than younger.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>EAEC load in stool samples are higher in children with diarrhoea than in asymptomatic infection. This qPCR could be useful for studying the role of colonisation in children living in endemic areas where the isolation of this pathogen is similar in both groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"43 9","pages":"Pages 563-570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144175915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}