Darae Kim, Eunjung Lee, Jihoon Kim, Eun Kyoung Kim, Sung-A Chang, Sung-Ji Park, Jin-Oh Choi, Young Keun On, Zachi Attia, Paul Friedman, Kyoung-Min Park, Jae K Oh
Aims: To assess the performance of an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) algorithm in identifying patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis (AS) in an Asian cohort from a tertiary care centre.
Methods and results: We identified a randomly selected patients ≥60 years old who underwent echocardiography and ECG within in 31 days between 2012 and 2021 at the Samsung Medical Center in Korea. Patients with previous cardiac surgery, prosthetic valves, or pacemakers were excluded. The AI-ECG model, originally developed and validated by Mayo Clinic in the USA, was applied without fine-tuning. Performance metrics, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, were calculated to compare AI-ECG predictions with TTE-confirmed AS status. Among 5425 patients, 1095 had moderate to severe AS, and 4330 age- and sex-matched patients without AS were included as controls. The AI-ECG model achieved an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84-0.87) in detecting moderate to severe AS. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 0.83, 0.65, 0.37, 0.94, and 68.29%, respectively. The model's performance was consistent across various age and sex subgroups, with sensitivity increasing in older patients.
Conclusion: The AI-ECG model developed in the USA demonstrated comparable performance in detecting moderate to severe AS in an Asian cohort compared with its original validation population. These findings highlight the potential utility of AI-ECG as a non-invasive screening tool for AS across diverse patient populations.
{"title":"External assessment of an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram for aortic stenosis detection.","authors":"Darae Kim, Eunjung Lee, Jihoon Kim, Eun Kyoung Kim, Sung-A Chang, Sung-Ji Park, Jin-Oh Choi, Young Keun On, Zachi Attia, Paul Friedman, Kyoung-Min Park, Jae K Oh","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf067","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the performance of an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) algorithm in identifying patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis (AS) in an Asian cohort from a tertiary care centre.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We identified a randomly selected patients ≥60 years old who underwent echocardiography and ECG within in 31 days between 2012 and 2021 at the Samsung Medical Center in Korea. Patients with previous cardiac surgery, prosthetic valves, or pacemakers were excluded. The AI-ECG model, originally developed and validated by Mayo Clinic in the USA, was applied without fine-tuning. Performance metrics, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, were calculated to compare AI-ECG predictions with TTE-confirmed AS status. Among 5425 patients, 1095 had moderate to severe AS, and 4330 age- and sex-matched patients without AS were included as controls. The AI-ECG model achieved an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84-0.87) in detecting moderate to severe AS. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 0.83, 0.65, 0.37, 0.94, and 68.29%, respectively. The model's performance was consistent across various age and sex subgroups, with sensitivity increasing in older patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI-ECG model developed in the USA demonstrated comparable performance in detecting moderate to severe AS in an Asian cohort compared with its original validation population. These findings highlight the potential utility of AI-ECG as a non-invasive screening tool for AS across diverse patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 4","pages":"656-664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12282354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144700490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims: Assessing myocardial fibrosis (MF) in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) is crucial for prognosis. Artificial intelligence-assisted electrocardiography (AI-ECG) has a great potential to detect MF. However, training a precise AI-ECG model requires voluminous ECGs. A biosimulation model may be an efficient substitution. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel artificial intelligence-assisted method using 12-lead electrocardiography (AI-MI-12ECG).
Methods and results: The AI-MI-12ECG was trained by a biosimulation model to visualize the presence, location, and size of MF in post-MI patients. A total of 182 post-MI patients were included in this prospective study. The MF detected by AI-MI-12ECG and the cardiologist were compared with the late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) area of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The results show that AI-MI-12ECG exhibited strong correlation with LGE in identifying the MI location (R = 0.955). Compared with CMR-LGE, AI-MI-12ECG achieved receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.95, 0.95, and 0.89 for left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), right coronary artery (RCA), and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) territories, respectively, with high accuracies for LAD (0.95), RCA (0.97), and LCX (0.91).
Conclusion: The AI-MI-12ECG trained using the biosimulation model in post-MI patients was adequately aligned with CMR-LGE. This highlights its potential for accurate detection of fibrosis and identification of individuals with significant infarct burdens.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-based accurate myocardial infarction mapping using 12-lead electrocardiography.","authors":"Hui Wang, Zhifan Gao, Heye Zhang, Yuzhen Zhu, Shichang Lian, Kairui Bo, Shuang Li, Yifeng Gao, Baiyan Zhuang, Zhen Zhou, Xinwei Zhang, Cuiyan Wang, Koen Nieman, Lei Xu","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf077","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Assessing myocardial fibrosis (MF) in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) is crucial for prognosis. Artificial intelligence-assisted electrocardiography (AI-ECG) has a great potential to detect MF. However, training a precise AI-ECG model requires voluminous ECGs. A biosimulation model may be an efficient substitution. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel artificial intelligence-assisted method using 12-lead electrocardiography (AI-MI-12ECG).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The AI-MI-12ECG was trained by a biosimulation model to visualize the presence, location, and size of MF in post-MI patients. A total of 182 post-MI patients were included in this prospective study. The MF detected by AI-MI-12ECG and the cardiologist were compared with the late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) area of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The results show that AI-MI-12ECG exhibited strong correlation with LGE in identifying the MI location (<i>R</i> = 0.955). Compared with CMR-LGE, AI-MI-12ECG achieved receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.95, 0.95, and 0.89 for left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), right coronary artery (RCA), and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) territories, respectively, with high accuracies for LAD (0.95), RCA (0.97), and LCX (0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI-MI-12ECG trained using the biosimulation model in post-MI patients was adequately aligned with CMR-LGE. This highlights its potential for accurate detection of fibrosis and identification of individuals with significant infarct burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"939-948"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-30eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf075
Dominik Felbel, Merten Prüser, Constanze Schmidt, Björn Schreiweis, Nicolai Spicher, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Julian Varghese, Andreas Zietzer, Stefan Störk, Christoph Dieterich, Dagmar Krefting, Eimo Martens, Martin Sedlmayr, Dario Bongiovanni, Christoph B Olivier, Hendrik Lapp, Hannes H J G Schmidt, Julius L Katzmann, Felix Nensa, Norbert Frey, Gudrun S Ulrich-Merzenich, Carina A Peter, Peter Heuschmann, Udo Bavendiek, Sven Zenker
Aims: Personalized risk assessment tools (PRTs) are recommended by cardiovascular guidelines to tailor prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. However, PRT implementation in clinical routine is poor. ACRIBiS (Advancing Cardiovascular Risk Identification with Structured Clinical Documentation and Biosignal Derived Phenotypes Synthesis) aims to establish interoperable infrastructures for standardized documentation of routine data and integration of high-resolution biosignals (HRBs) enabling data-based risk assessment.
Methods and results: Established cardiovascular risk scores were selected by their predictive performance and served as basis for building a core cardiovascular dataset with risk-relevant clinical routine information. Data items not yet represented in the Medical Informatics Inititative (MII) Core Dataset (CDS) FHIR profiles will be added to an extension module 'Cardiology' allowing for maximum interoperability. HRB integration will be implemented at each site through a modular infrastructure for electrocardiography (ECG) processing. Predictive performance of PRTs and their dynamic recalibration through HRB integration will be evaluated within the ACRIBiS cohort consisting of 5250 prospectively recruited patients at 15 German academic cardiology departments with 12-month follow-up. The potential of visualising these risks to improve patient education will also be assessed and supported by the development of a self-assessment app.
Discussion: The ACRIBiS project presents an innovative concept to harmonize clinical data documentation and integrate ECG data, ultimately facilitating personalized risk assessment to improve patient empowerment and prognosis. Importantly, the consensus-based documentation and interoperability specifications developed will support the standardisation of routine patient data collection at the national and international levels, while the ACRIBiS cohort dataset will be available for broad secondary use.
Trial registration: The study is registered at the German study registry (DRKS): #DRKS00034792.
{"title":"The 'Advancing Cardiovascular Risk Identification with Structured Clinical Documentation and Biosignal Derived Phenotypes Synthesis' project: conceptual design, project planning, and first implementation experiences.","authors":"Dominik Felbel, Merten Prüser, Constanze Schmidt, Björn Schreiweis, Nicolai Spicher, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Julian Varghese, Andreas Zietzer, Stefan Störk, Christoph Dieterich, Dagmar Krefting, Eimo Martens, Martin Sedlmayr, Dario Bongiovanni, Christoph B Olivier, Hendrik Lapp, Hannes H J G Schmidt, Julius L Katzmann, Felix Nensa, Norbert Frey, Gudrun S Ulrich-Merzenich, Carina A Peter, Peter Heuschmann, Udo Bavendiek, Sven Zenker","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf075","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Personalized risk assessment tools (PRTs) are recommended by cardiovascular guidelines to tailor prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. However, PRT implementation in clinical routine is poor. ACRIBiS (Advancing Cardiovascular Risk Identification with Structured Clinical Documentation and Biosignal Derived Phenotypes Synthesis) aims to establish interoperable infrastructures for standardized documentation of routine data and integration of high-resolution biosignals (HRBs) enabling data-based risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Established cardiovascular risk scores were selected by their predictive performance and served as basis for building a core cardiovascular dataset with risk-relevant clinical routine information. Data items not yet represented in the Medical Informatics Inititative (MII) Core Dataset (CDS) FHIR profiles will be added to an extension module 'Cardiology' allowing for maximum interoperability. HRB integration will be implemented at each site through a modular infrastructure for electrocardiography (ECG) processing. Predictive performance of PRTs and their dynamic recalibration through HRB integration will be evaluated within the ACRIBiS cohort consisting of 5250 prospectively recruited patients at 15 German academic cardiology departments with 12-month follow-up. The potential of visualising these risks to improve patient education will also be assessed and supported by the development of a self-assessment app.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The ACRIBiS project presents an innovative concept to harmonize clinical data documentation and integrate ECG data, ultimately facilitating personalized risk assessment to improve patient empowerment and prognosis. Importantly, the consensus-based documentation and interoperability specifications developed will support the standardisation of routine patient data collection at the national and international levels, while the ACRIBiS cohort dataset will be available for broad secondary use.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study is registered at the German study registry (DRKS): #DRKS00034792.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"1084-1093"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450505/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-26eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf061
Samuel L Johnston, E John Barsotti, Constantinos Bakogiannis, Artur Fedorowski, Fabrizio Ricci, Eric G Heller, Robert S Sheldon, Richard Sutton, Win-Kuang Shen, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Mehul Adhaduk, William H Parker, Arwa Aburizik, Corey R Haselton, Alex J Cuskey, Sangil Lee, Madeleine Johansson, Donald Macfarlane, Paari Dominic, Haruhiko Abe, B Hygriv Rao, Avinash Mudireddy, Milan Sonka, Roopinder K Sandhu, Rose Anne Kenny, Giselle M Statz, Rakesh Gopinathannair, David Benditt, Franca Dipaola, Mauro Gatti, Roberto Menè, Alessandro Giaj Levra, Dana Shiffer, Giorgio Costantino, Raffaello Furlan, Martin H Ruwald, Vassilios Vassilikos, Milena A Gebska, Brian Olshansky
Aims: Syncope remains a diagnostic challenge despite advancements in testing and treatment. Cardiac syncope is an independent predictor of mortality and can be difficult to distinguish from other causes of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). This paper explores whether artificial intelligence (AI) can improve the evaluation and management of patients with syncope.
Methods and results: We conducted a literature review and incorporated the opinions of experts in the fields of syncope and AI. The cause of TLOC is often unclear, hospitalization criteria are ambiguous, diagnostic tests are frequently non-informative, and assessments are costly. Patients are left with unanswered questions and limited guidance. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to optimize syncope evaluation by processing large data sets, detecting imperceptible patterns, and assisting clinicians. However, AI has limitations, including errors, lack of human empathy, and uncertain clinical utility. Liability issues further complicate its integration. We present three viewpoints: (i) AI is crucial for advancing syncope management; (ii) AI can enhance the patient experience; and (iii) AI in syncope care is inevitable.
Conclusion: Artificial intelligence may improve syncope diagnosis and management, particularly through machine learning-based test interpretation and wearable device data. However, it has yet to surpass human clinical judgment in complex decision-making. Current challenges include gaps in understanding syncope mechanisms, AI interpretability, generalizability, and clinical integration. Standardized diagnostic approaches, real-world validation, and curated data sets are essential for progress. Artificial intelligence may enhance efficiency and communication but raises concerns regarding confidentiality, bias, inequities, and legal implications.
{"title":"The hope and the hype of artificial intelligence for syncope management.","authors":"Samuel L Johnston, E John Barsotti, Constantinos Bakogiannis, Artur Fedorowski, Fabrizio Ricci, Eric G Heller, Robert S Sheldon, Richard Sutton, Win-Kuang Shen, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Mehul Adhaduk, William H Parker, Arwa Aburizik, Corey R Haselton, Alex J Cuskey, Sangil Lee, Madeleine Johansson, Donald Macfarlane, Paari Dominic, Haruhiko Abe, B Hygriv Rao, Avinash Mudireddy, Milan Sonka, Roopinder K Sandhu, Rose Anne Kenny, Giselle M Statz, Rakesh Gopinathannair, David Benditt, Franca Dipaola, Mauro Gatti, Roberto Menè, Alessandro Giaj Levra, Dana Shiffer, Giorgio Costantino, Raffaello Furlan, Martin H Ruwald, Vassilios Vassilikos, Milena A Gebska, Brian Olshansky","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf061","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Syncope remains a diagnostic challenge despite advancements in testing and treatment. Cardiac syncope is an independent predictor of mortality and can be difficult to distinguish from other causes of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). This paper explores whether artificial intelligence (AI) can improve the evaluation and management of patients with syncope.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a literature review and incorporated the opinions of experts in the fields of syncope and AI. The cause of TLOC is often unclear, hospitalization criteria are ambiguous, diagnostic tests are frequently non-informative, and assessments are costly. Patients are left with unanswered questions and limited guidance. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to optimize syncope evaluation by processing large data sets, detecting imperceptible patterns, and assisting clinicians. However, AI has limitations, including errors, lack of human empathy, and uncertain clinical utility. Liability issues further complicate its integration. We present three viewpoints: (i) AI is crucial for advancing syncope management; (ii) AI can enhance the patient experience; and (iii) AI in syncope care is inevitable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Artificial intelligence may improve syncope diagnosis and management, particularly through machine learning-based test interpretation and wearable device data. However, it has yet to surpass human clinical judgment in complex decision-making. Current challenges include gaps in understanding syncope mechanisms, AI interpretability, generalizability, and clinical integration. Standardized diagnostic approaches, real-world validation, and curated data sets are essential for progress. Artificial intelligence may enhance efficiency and communication but raises concerns regarding confidentiality, bias, inequities, and legal implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"1046-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450521/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-23eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf072
Maria Kundzierewicz, Katarzyna Kołodziej, Arif Khokhar, Tsai Tsung-Ying, Artur Leśniak, Pawel Zakrzewski, Hubert Borecki, Ewelina Bohn, Jan Hecko, Jaroslav Januska, Daniel Precek, Maciej Stanuch, Andrzej Skalski, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick Serruys, Nico Bruining, Adriana Złahoda-Huzior, Dariusz Dudek
The complexity and spatial relationships between vascular and cardiac structures, as well as anatomical diversity, pose a challenge for planning and performing cardiac interventions. Medical imaging, especially precise three-dimensional imaging techniques, plays a key role in the decision-making process. While traditional imaging methods like angiography, echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging remain gold standards, they have limitations in representing spatial relationships effectively. To overcome these limitations, advanced techniques such as three-dimensional printing, three-dimensional modelling, and Extended Realities are needed. Focusing on Extended Realities, their main advantages are direct spatial visualization based on medical data, interaction with objects, and immersion in cardiac anatomy. These benefits impact procedural planning and intra-procedural navigation. The following publication presents current applications, benefits, drawbacks, and limitations of Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality technologies in cardiac interventions. The aim of this review is to improve understanding and utilization of the entire spectrum of these innovative tools in clinical practice.
{"title":"Catheterization laboratories open the doors for Extended Realities-review of clinical applications in cardiology.","authors":"Maria Kundzierewicz, Katarzyna Kołodziej, Arif Khokhar, Tsai Tsung-Ying, Artur Leśniak, Pawel Zakrzewski, Hubert Borecki, Ewelina Bohn, Jan Hecko, Jaroslav Januska, Daniel Precek, Maciej Stanuch, Andrzej Skalski, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick Serruys, Nico Bruining, Adriana Złahoda-Huzior, Dariusz Dudek","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf072","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The complexity and spatial relationships between vascular and cardiac structures, as well as anatomical diversity, pose a challenge for planning and performing cardiac interventions. Medical imaging, especially precise three-dimensional imaging techniques, plays a key role in the decision-making process. While traditional imaging methods like angiography, echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging remain gold standards, they have limitations in representing spatial relationships effectively. To overcome these limitations, advanced techniques such as three-dimensional printing, three-dimensional modelling, and Extended Realities are needed. Focusing on Extended Realities, their main advantages are direct spatial visualization based on medical data, interaction with objects, and immersion in cardiac anatomy. These benefits impact procedural planning and intra-procedural navigation. The following publication presents current applications, benefits, drawbacks, and limitations of Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality technologies in cardiac interventions. The aim of this review is to improve understanding and utilization of the entire spectrum of these innovative tools in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"1055-1068"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450514/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-23eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf073
Felicia H K Hakansson, Erik Bodin, Vincent Dutordoir, Axel Gemvik, Thomas Olsson, Isabelle Nilsson, Mikael Andersson Franko, Jonas Spaak, Christina Ekenbäck, Loghman Henareh, Carl Henrik Ek, Per Tornvall
Aims: Machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to the electrocardiography (ECG) have been successful in several cardiac diagnoses, however, rarely been used for the diagnostics of takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Our aim was to develop ML-based ECG-models to differentiate TTS from patients with myocardial infarction (MI).
Methods and results: Cross-sectional study in Stockholm. A neural network with UNet architecture was trained and validated on 507 TTS cases and 14 978 controls with suspected and verified MI, identified from the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty register. Cross-validation was performed. The models were compared with cardiologists using previously proposed ECG criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating TTS from patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI ROC AUC 0.88 (cross-validation: 0.85-0.92) and 0.86 (cross-validation: 0.82-0.91), respectively. ROC AUC for discriminating TTS from verified MI [non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) and ST-elevation MI (STEMI)] was 0.87 (cross-validation: 0.83-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.83) with low positive predictive value (PPV) and high negative predictive value (NPV). Results for suspected MI was ROC AUC 0.85 (cross validation: 0.81-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) with low PPV (0.11) and high NPV (0.99). The committee of two cardiologists using a combination of ECG criteria achieved an ROC AUC of 0.71.
Conclusion: Machine learning models could discriminate TTS from MI (NSTEMI and STEMI) and suspected MI with high sensitivity and NPV, outperforming cardiologists using conventional criteria. The models require further refinement to increase PPV, precision-recall and external validation, but it holds promise for TTS screening aiding the clinician in ruling out TTS.
{"title":"Machine learning electrocardiography model to differentiate takotsubo syndrome from myocardial infarction.","authors":"Felicia H K Hakansson, Erik Bodin, Vincent Dutordoir, Axel Gemvik, Thomas Olsson, Isabelle Nilsson, Mikael Andersson Franko, Jonas Spaak, Christina Ekenbäck, Loghman Henareh, Carl Henrik Ek, Per Tornvall","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf073","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to the electrocardiography (ECG) have been successful in several cardiac diagnoses, however, rarely been used for the diagnostics of takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Our aim was to develop ML-based ECG-models to differentiate TTS from patients with myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Cross-sectional study in Stockholm. A neural network with UNet architecture was trained and validated on 507 TTS cases and 14 978 controls with suspected and verified MI, identified from the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty register. Cross-validation was performed. The models were compared with cardiologists using previously proposed ECG criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating TTS from patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI ROC AUC 0.88 (cross-validation: 0.85-0.92) and 0.86 (cross-validation: 0.82-0.91), respectively. ROC AUC for discriminating TTS from verified MI [non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) and ST-elevation MI (STEMI)] was 0.87 (cross-validation: 0.83-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.83) with low positive predictive value (PPV) and high negative predictive value (NPV). Results for suspected MI was ROC AUC 0.85 (cross validation: 0.81-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) with low PPV (0.11) and high NPV (0.99). The committee of two cardiologists using a combination of ECG criteria achieved an ROC AUC of 0.71.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models could discriminate TTS from MI (NSTEMI and STEMI) and suspected MI with high sensitivity and NPV, outperforming cardiologists using conventional criteria. The models require further refinement to increase PPV, precision-recall and external validation, but it holds promise for TTS screening aiding the clinician in ruling out TTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"929-938"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450510/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims: To identify ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) patients with different phenotypes for evaluating their outcomes and heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods and results: We applied a machine learning-based consensus, K-Medoids clustering analysis to the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure trial. We compared the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality among different phenotypes. The survival benefits of CABG compared with medical therapy alone were assessed in the identified phenotypes for evaluating HTEs. The consensus clustering analysis identified three distinct clinical phenotypes among 1212 ICM patients based on 19 variables. Specifically, phenotype 1 (n = 371) was characterized by younger ages, higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and lower left ventricular end-systolic volume index (n = 371). Phenotype 2 had higher angina grades and more left main/left anterior descending artery stenosis (n = 520). Phenotype 3 had lower LVEF, higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) grades, more diabetes, and less hypertension (n = 321). After a median of 9.8 follow-up years, phenotype 3 had the highest risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 1.96; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.62-2.37] and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.95-3.10) compared to phenotype 1. Among phenotype 3, CABG provided significant survival benefits in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90) compared with medical therapy alone.
Conclusion: We identified three phenotypes with distinct outcomes and HTEs among ICM patients. Patients with lower LVEF, higher NYHA grades, and diabetes had the poorest clinical outcomes but were more likely to derive greater survival benefits from CABG.
{"title":"Identification of clinical phenotypes and heterogeneous treatment effects of surgical revascularization in ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a machine learning consensus clustering analysis.","authors":"Tongxin Chu, Zhuoming Zhou, Huayang Li, Han Hu, Pengning Fan, Suiqing Huang, Jiatang Xu, Qiushi Ren, Qingyang Song, Gang Li, Mengya Liang, Zhongkai Wu","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf066","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) patients with different phenotypes for evaluating their outcomes and heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We applied a machine learning-based consensus, K-Medoids clustering analysis to the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure trial. We compared the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality among different phenotypes. The survival benefits of CABG compared with medical therapy alone were assessed in the identified phenotypes for evaluating HTEs. The consensus clustering analysis identified three distinct clinical phenotypes among 1212 ICM patients based on 19 variables. Specifically, phenotype 1 (<i>n</i> = 371) was characterized by younger ages, higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and lower left ventricular end-systolic volume index (<i>n</i> = 371). Phenotype 2 had higher angina grades and more left main/left anterior descending artery stenosis (<i>n</i> = 520). Phenotype 3 had lower LVEF, higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) grades, more diabetes, and less hypertension (<i>n</i> = 321). After a median of 9.8 follow-up years, phenotype 3 had the highest risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 1.96; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.62-2.37] and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.95-3.10) compared to phenotype 1. Among phenotype 3, CABG provided significant survival benefits in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90) compared with medical therapy alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified three phenotypes with distinct outcomes and HTEs among ICM patients. Patients with lower LVEF, higher NYHA grades, and diabetes had the poorest clinical outcomes but were more likely to derive greater survival benefits from CABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"919-928"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450507/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-20eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf069
Niels A Stens, Geert A A Versteeg, Maxim J P Rooijakkers, Roos de Lange, Stijn J H Bonekamp, Marleen H van Wely, Robert Jan M van Geuns, Michel W A Verkroost, Leen A F M van Garsse, Guillaume S C Geuzebroek, Robin H Heijmen, Lokien X van Nunen, Dick H J Thijssen, Niels van Royen
Aims: Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is frequently observed following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). Periprocedural monitoring of invasive hemodynamics has shown promise for diagnosis of PVR, but automated software options are lacking. We aimed to develop a rule-based algorithm for automated assessment of hemodynamic indices of PVR, and evaluate its construct validity and discriminatory value for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived relevant PVR compared to standard manual hemodynamic assessment.
Methods and results: Left ventricular and aortic pressures were invasively measured during TAVR using fluid-filled pigtail catheters. To evaluate construct validity of automated vs. manual assessment of invasive hemodynamics, we compared (i) proportion of cardiac cycles affected by arrhythmias/noise, (ii) pressure gradients, and (iii) PVR indices. Additionally, we compared the discriminatory value of automatically and manually determined PVR indices for CMR-determined relevant PVR at 30-days. In total, 77 patients were enrolled (664 cardiac cycles). Automated filtering of cardiac cycles affected by arrhythmias/noise had a high sensitivity (95.2%) and specificity (86.4%). In addition, excellent agreement was observed between automated and manual computation of mean gradients pre- and post-TAVR [39.3 ± 12.1 vs. 37.5 ± 11.9 mmHg, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.916; 1.92 ± 5.87 vs. 1.14 ± 5.89, ICC: 0.957, respectively], and PVR indices [diastolic delta (DD): 41.7 ± 12.4 vs. 40.6 ± 12.3 mmHg, ICC: 0.982, respectively]. Automated and manual assessment of DD showed comparable discriminatory value for relevant PVR [area under the curve (AUC): 0.81 vs. 0.80, respectively].
Conclusion: Rule-based, automated assessment of hemodynamic indices of PVR showed excellent construct validity and discriminatory value for CMR-determined relevant PVR, supporting its use for real-time evaluation and risk stratification in TAVR patients.
目的:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后经常观察到瓣旁反流(PVR)。围手术期监测侵入性血流动力学已显示出诊断PVR的希望,但缺乏自动化的软件选择。我们旨在开发一种基于规则的PVR血流动力学指标自动评估算法,并与标准手工血流动力学评估相比,评估其对心脏磁共振(CMR)衍生相关PVR的结构效度和区分价值。方法和结果:在TAVR期间,使用充满液体的细尾导管有创地测量左心室和主动脉压力。为了评估侵入性血流动力学自动评估与人工评估的结构有效性,我们比较了(i)心律失常/噪声影响的心周期比例,(ii)压力梯度和(iii) PVR指数。此外,我们比较了自动和手动确定的PVR指标在30天cmr确定的相关PVR的区别值。共纳入77例患者(664个心动周期)。心律失常/噪声影响的心循环自动过滤具有高灵敏度(95.2%)和特异性(86.4%)。此外,自动和手动计算tavr前后的平均梯度之间的一致性非常好[39.3±12.1 vs 37.5±11.9 mmHg,类内相关系数(ICC): 0.916;1.92±5.87比1.14±5.89,ICC分别为0.957],PVR指数[舒张δ (DD): 41.7±12.4比40.6±12.3 mmHg, ICC分别为0.982]。自动和手动DD评估对相关PVR的区分值相当[曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.81和0.80]。结论:基于规则的PVR血流动力学指标自动评估对cmr确定的相关PVR具有良好的结构效度和判别价值,支持其用于TAVR患者的实时评估和风险分层。
{"title":"Construct validity of automated assessment of invasively measured hemodynamics during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Niels A Stens, Geert A A Versteeg, Maxim J P Rooijakkers, Roos de Lange, Stijn J H Bonekamp, Marleen H van Wely, Robert Jan M van Geuns, Michel W A Verkroost, Leen A F M van Garsse, Guillaume S C Geuzebroek, Robin H Heijmen, Lokien X van Nunen, Dick H J Thijssen, Niels van Royen","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf069","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is frequently observed following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). Periprocedural monitoring of invasive hemodynamics has shown promise for diagnosis of PVR, but automated software options are lacking. We aimed to develop a rule-based algorithm for automated assessment of hemodynamic indices of PVR, and evaluate its construct validity and discriminatory value for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived relevant PVR compared to standard manual hemodynamic assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Left ventricular and aortic pressures were invasively measured during TAVR using fluid-filled pigtail catheters. To evaluate construct validity of automated vs. manual assessment of invasive hemodynamics, we compared (i) proportion of cardiac cycles affected by arrhythmias/noise, (ii) pressure gradients, and (iii) PVR indices. Additionally, we compared the discriminatory value of automatically and manually determined PVR indices for CMR-determined relevant PVR at 30-days. In total, 77 patients were enrolled (664 cardiac cycles). Automated filtering of cardiac cycles affected by arrhythmias/noise had a high sensitivity (95.2%) and specificity (86.4%). In addition, excellent agreement was observed between automated and manual computation of mean gradients pre- and post-TAVR [39.3 ± 12.1 vs. 37.5 ± 11.9 mmHg, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.916; 1.92 ± 5.87 vs. 1.14 ± 5.89, ICC: 0.957, respectively], and PVR indices [diastolic delta (DD): 41.7 ± 12.4 vs. 40.6 ± 12.3 mmHg, ICC: 0.982, respectively]. Automated and manual assessment of DD showed comparable discriminatory value for relevant PVR [area under the curve (AUC): 0.81 vs. 0.80, respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rule-based, automated assessment of hemodynamic indices of PVR showed excellent construct validity and discriminatory value for CMR-determined relevant PVR, supporting its use for real-time evaluation and risk stratification in TAVR patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"1006-1014"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450506/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-19eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf071
Luisa Freyer, Peter Spielbichler, Lukas von Stülpnagel, Konstantinos Mourouzis, Lukas Tenbrink, Laura Elisa Villegas Sierra, Maria F Vogl, Lauren E Sams, Annika Schneidewind, Mathias Klemm, Steffen Massberg, Axel Bauer, Konstantinos D Rizas
Aims: Smartphone-based digital screening was shown to increase the detection rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring oral anticoagulation (OAC) compared with usual care. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the eBRAVE-AF trial, we explored sex-specific differences in digital AF-screening.
Methods and results: In eBRAVE-AF (NCT04250220), participating policyholders of a German health insurance company were randomly assigned to a 6-month digital or conventional AF-screening strategy. For digital screening, participants used smartphone-based photoplethysmography (PPG) to detect pulse wave irregularities, which were confirmed using 14-day external ECG-recorders. The primary endpoint was newly diagnosed AF treated with OAC. After 6 months, participants were assigned to a second, cross-over study-phase. The efficacy of AF-screening in women and men was assessed by Cox-regression analysis. 5551 (31% females; 55% ≥ 65 years) of 67 488 invited policyholders free of AF participated in the study and were randomly assigned to digital screening (n = 2860) or usual care (n = 2691). Participation rate was significantly higher among men than women (8.7% vs. 7.3%; P < 0.001). Male sex was a significant predictor for reaching the primary endpoint (HR 1.74; 95% CI: 1.08-2.82, P = 0.023), which was pronounced in patients undergoing digital screening (HR 2.48; 95% CI: 1.52-4.05, P < 0.001). Digital screening did not significantly increase the detection rate of AF requiring OAC in women (HR 1.83; 95% CI: 0.74-4.54; P = 0.193; P-interaction = 0.563).
Conclusion: Men showed higher willingness to participate in this digital study and digital AF-screening was effective for them. While digital screening increased the detection rate of AF with OAC in women, the effect was not statistically significant, likely due to limited power.
{"title":"Gender specific aspects of digital screening for atrial fibrillation: insights from the randomized eBRAVE-AF trial.","authors":"Luisa Freyer, Peter Spielbichler, Lukas von Stülpnagel, Konstantinos Mourouzis, Lukas Tenbrink, Laura Elisa Villegas Sierra, Maria F Vogl, Lauren E Sams, Annika Schneidewind, Mathias Klemm, Steffen Massberg, Axel Bauer, Konstantinos D Rizas","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf071","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Smartphone-based digital screening was shown to increase the detection rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring oral anticoagulation (OAC) compared with usual care. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the eBRAVE-AF trial, we explored sex-specific differences in digital AF-screening.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In eBRAVE-AF (NCT04250220), participating policyholders of a German health insurance company were randomly assigned to a 6-month digital or conventional AF-screening strategy. For digital screening, participants used smartphone-based photoplethysmography (PPG) to detect pulse wave irregularities, which were confirmed using 14-day external ECG-recorders. The primary endpoint was newly diagnosed AF treated with OAC. After 6 months, participants were assigned to a second, cross-over study-phase. The efficacy of AF-screening in women and men was assessed by Cox-regression analysis. 5551 (31% females; 55% ≥ 65 years) of 67 488 invited policyholders free of AF participated in the study and were randomly assigned to digital screening (<i>n</i> = 2860) or usual care (<i>n</i> = 2691). Participation rate was significantly higher among men than women (8.7% vs. 7.3%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Male sex was a significant predictor for reaching the primary endpoint (HR 1.74; 95% CI: 1.08-2.82, <i>P</i> = 0.023), which was pronounced in patients undergoing digital screening (HR 2.48; 95% CI: 1.52-4.05, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Digital screening did not significantly increase the detection rate of AF requiring OAC in women (HR 1.83; 95% CI: 0.74-4.54; <i>P</i> = 0.193; <i>P</i>-interaction = 0.563).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Men showed higher willingness to participate in this digital study and digital AF-screening was effective for them. While digital screening increased the detection rate of AF with OAC in women, the effect was not statistically significant, likely due to limited power.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"1015-1023"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-19eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf070
Dominika Kanschik, Raphael Romano Bruno, Michel E van Genderen, Patrick W Serruys, Tsung-Ying Tsai, Malte Kelm, Christian Jung
Extended reality (XR) is an emerging technology currently finding its way into various medical fields. This systematic review aimed to compile a comprehensive overview of the current data on XR in cardiovascular medicine. To identify the currently available evidence of the applications of XR in cardiology, we searched PubMed and Web of Science until 31 July 2024 using predefined keywords. After screening, a total of 164 studies were included. Overall, the publications were characterized by very heterogeneous study designs. From the published data, it can already be deduced that XR can support every area of cardiology, from education (n = 31) and training (n = 36) to peri-procedural care (n = 78) and rehabilitation (n = 16). Extended reality offers a wide range of applications, and the aim of using these technologies is to optimize the clinical practice. However, these technologies are still in development, and randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to identify their benefits and limitations.
{"title":"Extended reality in cardiovascular care: a systematic review.","authors":"Dominika Kanschik, Raphael Romano Bruno, Michel E van Genderen, Patrick W Serruys, Tsung-Ying Tsai, Malte Kelm, Christian Jung","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf070","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extended reality (XR) is an emerging technology currently finding its way into various medical fields. This systematic review aimed to compile a comprehensive overview of the current data on XR in cardiovascular medicine. To identify the currently available evidence of the applications of XR in cardiology, we searched PubMed and Web of Science until 31 July 2024 using predefined keywords. After screening, a total of 164 studies were included. Overall, the publications were characterized by very heterogeneous study designs. From the published data, it can already be deduced that XR can support every area of cardiology, from education (<i>n</i> = 31) and training (<i>n</i> = 36) to peri-procedural care (<i>n</i> = 78) and rehabilitation (<i>n</i> = 16). Extended reality offers a wide range of applications, and the aim of using these technologies is to optimize the clinical practice. However, these technologies are still in development, and randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to identify their benefits and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"878-887"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450517/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145126730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}