Pub Date : 2025-07-21DOI: 10.1007/s11249-025-02038-4
Shintaro Hatanaka, Hikaru Okubo, Kentaro Hanzawa, Ryo Kajiki, Ken Yamaguchi, Ken Nakano
This study has developed the sliding contact resonance (SCR) method, which measures three timescales, in no contact, stationary contact, and sliding contact, to investigate the mechanism of abrasion pattern (AP) formation engraved on rubber surfaces. The SCR method employs a unique homemade apparatus of a single-degree-of-freedom forced oscillation system utilizing a macroscale sliding contact between a rubber roller and a rigid surface. This paper focuses on the timescales, based on the hypothesis that the product of the drive speed and an intrinsic time determines the AP spacing. As a result, we find that it is not the mechanical or material timescale, but rather the timescale of sliding contact, that determines the limiting AP spacing. Their strong correlation suggests that the intrinsic time of the rubber surface, required for deformation and recovery in sliding contact, determines the periodic spacing engraved on the surface.
{"title":"Exploring Abrasion Pattern Formation with Sliding Contact Resonance: What Timescale Determines Periodic Spacing?","authors":"Shintaro Hatanaka, Hikaru Okubo, Kentaro Hanzawa, Ryo Kajiki, Ken Yamaguchi, Ken Nakano","doi":"10.1007/s11249-025-02038-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11249-025-02038-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study has developed the sliding contact resonance (SCR) method, which measures three timescales, in no contact, stationary contact, and sliding contact, to investigate the mechanism of abrasion pattern (AP) formation engraved on rubber surfaces. The SCR method employs a unique homemade apparatus of a single-degree-of-freedom forced oscillation system utilizing a macroscale sliding contact between a rubber roller and a rigid surface. This paper focuses on the timescales, based on the hypothesis that the product of the drive speed and an intrinsic time determines the AP spacing. As a result, we find that it is not the mechanical or material timescale, but rather the timescale of sliding contact, that determines the limiting AP spacing. Their strong correlation suggests that the intrinsic time of the rubber surface, required for deformation and recovery in sliding contact, determines the periodic spacing engraved on the surface.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":806,"journal":{"name":"Tribology Letters","volume":"73 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11249-025-02038-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145168270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-19DOI: 10.1007/s11249-025-02046-4
Michal Žůrek, David Markusík, David Rebenda, Lukáš Kalina, Martin Hartl, Martin Vrbka
Nearly one third of workplace injuries results from slip- and trip-induced falls. Solid particles are among the most common floor contaminants in both occupational and outdoor environments, reducing shoe–floor friction and increasing slip risk. This study investigates how rubber hardness and surface roughness affect the frictional behaviour of shoe soles on smooth, particle-contaminated floors. Coefficient of friction (COF) measurements and post-test surface wear analyses were conducted using nitrile rubbers with hardness between 57.9 and 84.0 ShA and varied surface roughness. Samples were slid against smooth epoxy flooring in a pin-on-plate test simulating the heel-strike phase of walking. The floor was either clean or uniformly covered with corundum particles (40–50 µm, 120–140 µm, or 280–315 µm). On clean floors, increasing rubber hardness and roughness significantly decreased COF (p < 0.0001) due to reduced real contact area. Under contaminated conditions, softer and rougher rubbers yielded higher COF values (p < 0.0001). Higher COF correlated with greater floor wear, showing long scratches and grooves, suggesting slip occurs mainly at the particle–floor interface. Rubber hardness and surface roughness primarily influence the strength of the particle–elastomer interface; greater particle–elastomer strength suppresses particle rolling and thereby leads to an increase in COF. These findings indicate that, on particle-contaminated smooth floors, slip resistance is governed more by particle–floor interactions than by rubber adhesion. Increasing outsole roughness and reducing hardness can help mitigate the adverse effects of particle rolling within the contact area and improve the frictional performance of the outsole.