Asia Pacific Journal of Management最新文献

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted classroom instruction at every level, in every field, around the world. Graduate business programs, which are largely centered on “high-touch” interaction and exchanges among peers and with instructors via student-oriented learning approaches, faced a common challenge: a possible compromised learning experience resulting from the suspension of in-person education. This paper chronicles personal and professional transformations experienced by the authors while teaching four second-year electives at a graduate business school during the 2020–21 academic year. We reflect on how a particular mindset and specific strategic choices led to effective online teaching, mitigating the negative impact of the upheaval. We also consider this experience as a basis for developing online/offline “ambicultural” teaching methods for adoption in the post-pandemic world. Academics may find this account to be a useful learning tool and a guide for transforming their teaching in both the virtual and in-person classroom environments.

Frequent changes in economic policy pose challenges to normal business production and operations. However, little is known about the non-market strategies adopted by firms in emerging economies, such as China, in response to economic policy uncertainty. This study proposes that firms in China respond to high levels of economic policy uncertainty by increasing philanthropic donations and bribery. In addition, this study argues that private firms and state-owned firms implement different strategies to cope with economic policy uncertainty. Specifically, the study suggests that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more likely, than non-SOEs, to respond to economic policy uncertainty by increasing corporate philanthropy, and less likely to respond by increasing expenditure on bribes. This study obtained empirical evidence to support these views, based on an analysis of a dataset of 2,904 listed Chinese firms from 2008 to 2019.

Previous studies have found that inclusive leadership has positive effects on employees’ behavior and performance in individuals and teams. Yet, there remains debate about whether increasing inclusive leadership is always beneficial in teams with high or low diversity. Following social exchange theory and the prior studies which put forward the potential drawbacks of inclusive leadership, we developed and tested a “Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing” (TMGT) model of an inverted U-shaped relation between inclusive leadership and team innovative behaviors. Using time-lagged and multi-source data collected from 65 team supervisors and 364 employees in China, we found an inverted U-shaped relation between inclusive leadership and team engagement, and team engagement mediated the inverted U-shaped relation between inclusive leadership and team innovative behaviors. Furthermore, results showed that team demographic diversity moderated this indirect curvilinear effect. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed at the end of the paper.

Although cyber incivility (i.e., an interpersonal workplace stressor displayed through uncivil behaviors manifested in online working communication) occurs every day in the workplace, we know little about how it influences employees’ task performance at daily level, nor why and when this influence occurs. To address these limitations, we theorized and tested a model that links cyber incivility to task performance via negative affect and sleep quality at daily level and a cross-level boundary condition at the person level (i.e., self-leadership). Multilevel modeling results based on data collected from 112 full-time employees with 866 observations suggest that daily cyber incivility has a time-lagged effect on task performance of the following day after controlling for task performance the same day. This intrapersonal effect can be explained by the induced negative affect of the following workday but not sleep quality of the previous night. In addition, the relationship between cyber incivility and negative affect and the indirect effect of cyber incivility on task performance via negative affect were weaker among employees with high rather than low self-leadership.

Although emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs) face substantial liabilities of origin (LoO) that hinder their global expansion, under-researched is whether trust-building with foreign partners in host markets can help them reduce these liabilities and enhance their subsidiary performance. Drawing on the relational exchange view and institutional theory, our study examines how interfirm trust affects EMNEs’ subsidiary performance in host countries, and how this effect is moderated by factors reflecting the regulative, normative, and cognitive institutional pressures that confront EMNEs in host countries. The results from a survey of 146 senior managers of overseas subsidiaries of Chinese multinational enterprises show that interfirm trust is positively related to subsidiary performance, and this positive effect is stronger when host countries’ legal systems are deficient but financial markets are munificent, and when EMNEs partner with state-owned foreign firms or possess rich international experience.

As part of the broader intellectual movement throughout the social sciences that is centered on new institutionalism, the institution-based view has emerged as a leading perspective in the strategic management literature. This article (1) traces the emergence of the institution-based view, (2) reviews its growth in the last two decades, and (3) responds to three of its major criticisms. We also identify four promising research directions—deglobalization and sanctions, competitive dynamics, hybrid organizations, and corporate social responsibility. Overall, we demonstrate that the thriving research on institutions has culminated in an institution-based paradigm, which has significant potential for future growth.

How do events, especially rare external events such as financial crises, wars, natural disasters, and the COVID-19 pandemic, affect the efficacy of entrepreneurial passion to drive organizational innovation? This study investigates the moderating role of events and entrepreneurs’ competence to exploit the events (opportunity competence) in the relationship between entrepreneurial passion and organizational innovation. Drawing insights from event system theory, we identified two critical event characteristics (i.e., event novelty and event criticality). Integrating the affect infusion model and the self-verification process in the identity literature, we argue that the two event characteristics and opportunity competence are crucial for entrepreneurs to exploit the benefits of entrepreneurial passion in promoting organizational innovation. After analyzing a survey sample of 435 entrepreneurs in Qinhuai Silicon Alley in China and an online survey of 202 entrepreneurs worldwide, we found that entrepreneurial passion exerts a stronger effect on organizational innovation when events are more novel and more critical to entrepreneurs, and when entrepreneurs have greater opportunity competence. We discuss these findings’ theoretical and practical implications later in this paper.

We developed and tested a theoretical model showing that authoritarian leadership has both positive and negative influences on employees’ work performance. We posited that authoritarian leadership may shape both challenge stressors and hindrance stressors, which compel and undermine in-role and extra-role performance, respectively. We found consistent results across two studies. In Study 1, our results from two samples in different cultures showed that authoritarian leadership was positively related to objective performance (Sample 1: n = 402 Chinese chain restaurant managers) and extra-role performance (Sample 2: n = 369 U.K. police officers) via challenge stressors. Authoritarian leadership was negatively related to objective performance and extra-role performance via hindrance stressors. In Study 2 (n = 195 Chinese power industry employees), we replicated the findings of Study 1. Further, we found that authoritarian leadership behaviors among leaders who scored low on power distance orientation were not negatively related to in-role and extra-role performance via hindrance stressors.

We connect business group research with literature on competitive repertoire—a firm’s portfolio of actions that characterize its strategy—to examine the influence of business group affiliation on firm strategy. We theorize that access to a larger stock and a broad range of resources, both within the firm and through the business group network, enables affiliate firms to execute a higher number (competitive repertoire intensity) and a wider variety (competitive repertoire complexity) of competitive actions. Our analysis of a sample of Indian firms during 2009–2017 supports our hypotheses. In supplementary analyses, we find that business group characteristics—size and affiliate intra-group position—positively influence competitive repertoire. We also find that competitive repertoire intensity mediates affiliation-firm performance relationship. Our findings enhance our understanding of business groups by establishing the link between affiliation-firm strategy-performance. Our work also extends research on network-based and ownership-based antecedents of competitive repertoire. We discuss these implications in detail.