首页 > 最新文献

Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Completion Rate of Paper-Based and Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures in a Multidisciplinary Cancer Survivorship Clinical Setting. 多学科癌症幸存者临床环境中纸质和电子患者报告结果测量的完成率。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14146
Sim Yee Tan, Jane Turner, Kim Kerin-Ayres, Lynnette Hewitt, Sue Butler, Cole Deguchi, Sonia Khatri, Carolyn Wildbore, Ilona Cunningham, Haryana M Dhillon, Ashanya Malalasekera, Janette L Vardy

Objective: Integrating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) into clinical practice is increasing, with research showing benefits in patient outcomes. However, evidence regarding patient's acceptance of PROMs is limited. Sydney Cancer Survivorship Centre (SCSC) clinic is a multidisciplinary clinic where clinicians use PROMs to guide patient consultation. This study explored SCSC patient acceptability of PROMs in clinical care by evaluating PROMs' completion rates.

Methods: This retrospective audit of PROMs completion rates evaluates two periods: 1) September 2013-November 2019 (pre-coronavirus disease 2019) and 2) October 2020-September 2023, following the implementation of electronic PROMs. Overall, 866 new patients attended SCSC during the two audit periods, with 822 (95%) giving consent for data to be included. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyse completion rates.

Results: Between September 2013 and November 2019 (audit period 1), 656 new survivors attended the SCSC clinic; 622 (95%) consented to data use. The highest completion rate for paper-based PROMs was the food questionnaire (92%); with 91% for distress thermometer, symptoms, and exercise-related PROMs; 85% for quality of life; 77% for self-rated performance status, and 55.5% for a 3-day food diary. From October 2020 to September 2023 (period 2), the response rate for PROMs was 99% (n = 198/200) for initial clinic attendees; and 92% for electronic PROMs (n = 169/184).

Conclusions: Using comprehensive PROMs in clinical care is feasible. The completion rate was high; similar between paper-based and electronic PROMs. Comprehensive PROMs can guide clinical consultations. PROMs may improve communication between survivors and clinicians and enhance the quality of care.

目的:将患者报告结果衡量指标(PROMs)纳入临床实践的情况越来越多,研究显示其对患者的治疗效果大有裨益。然而,有关患者接受 PROMs 的证据却很有限。悉尼癌症幸存者中心(SCSC)诊所是一家多学科诊所,临床医生在这里使用 PROMs 指导患者咨询。本研究通过评估PROMs的完成率,探讨SCSC患者在临床护理中对PROMs的接受程度:该PROMs完成率回顾性审计评估了两个时期:1)2013年9月至2019年11月(2019年科罗纳病毒病前);2)实施电子PROMs后的2020年10月至2023年9月。在两个审计期间,共有 866 名新患者就诊于 SCSC,其中 822 人(95%)同意纳入数据。采用描述性统计方法分析完成率:2013 年 9 月至 2019 年 11 月(审计期 1)期间,656 名新幸存者到 SCSC 诊所就诊;622 人(95%)同意使用数据。纸质PROM中完成率最高的是食物问卷(92%);体温计、症状和运动相关PROM的完成率为91%;生活质量的完成率为85%;自评表现状态的完成率为77%;3天食物日记的完成率为55.5%。从 2020 年 10 月到 2023 年 9 月(第 2 期),初次就诊者的 PROM 响应率为 99%(n = 198/200);电子 PROM 响应率为 92%(n = 169/184):结论:在临床护理中使用综合 PROMs 是可行的。结论:在临床护理中使用综合 PROM 是可行的,完成率很高;纸质和电子 PROM 的完成率相似。全面的 PROM 可为临床咨询提供指导。PROM可以改善幸存者与临床医生之间的沟通,提高护理质量。
{"title":"Completion Rate of Paper-Based and Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures in a Multidisciplinary Cancer Survivorship Clinical Setting.","authors":"Sim Yee Tan, Jane Turner, Kim Kerin-Ayres, Lynnette Hewitt, Sue Butler, Cole Deguchi, Sonia Khatri, Carolyn Wildbore, Ilona Cunningham, Haryana M Dhillon, Ashanya Malalasekera, Janette L Vardy","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Integrating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) into clinical practice is increasing, with research showing benefits in patient outcomes. However, evidence regarding patient's acceptance of PROMs is limited. Sydney Cancer Survivorship Centre (SCSC) clinic is a multidisciplinary clinic where clinicians use PROMs to guide patient consultation. This study explored SCSC patient acceptability of PROMs in clinical care by evaluating PROMs' completion rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective audit of PROMs completion rates evaluates two periods: 1) September 2013-November 2019 (pre-coronavirus disease 2019) and 2) October 2020-September 2023, following the implementation of electronic PROMs. Overall, 866 new patients attended SCSC during the two audit periods, with 822 (95%) giving consent for data to be included. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyse completion rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2013 and November 2019 (audit period 1), 656 new survivors attended the SCSC clinic; 622 (95%) consented to data use. The highest completion rate for paper-based PROMs was the food questionnaire (92%); with 91% for distress thermometer, symptoms, and exercise-related PROMs; 85% for quality of life; 77% for self-rated performance status, and 55.5% for a 3-day food diary. From October 2020 to September 2023 (period 2), the response rate for PROMs was 99% (n = 198/200) for initial clinic attendees; and 92% for electronic PROMs (n = 169/184).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using comprehensive PROMs in clinical care is feasible. The completion rate was high; similar between paper-based and electronic PROMs. Comprehensive PROMs can guide clinical consultations. PROMs may improve communication between survivors and clinicians and enhance the quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142827107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Post-prostatectomy Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiotherapy on a 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Integrated Linear Accelerator: Feasibility, Toxicity, and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes. 前列腺切除术后磁共振引导放射治疗在1.5特斯拉磁共振集成直线加速器:可行性,毒性和初步临床结果。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14144
Darren M C Poon, Jing Yuan, Oi Lei Wong, Bin Yang, Mei Yan Tse, Yan Yee Fung, Sin Ting Chiu, Wai Chi Lin, Kin Yin Cheung, George Chiu, Siu Ki Yu

Introduction: This study aimed to prospectively investigate magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) for post-prostatectomy prostate cancer and report preliminary clinical outcomes.

Methods: All included patients underwent salvage or adjuvant adaptive MRgRT on a 1.5T MR integrated linear accelerator (MR-LINAC). Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were assessed. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. A progression event was defined as the first occurrence of biochemical failure, radiological progression, or death. Secondary endpoints were biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) rate, radiological PFS (rPFS) rate, and ≥G2 adverse events.

Results: Thirty post-prostatectomy patients were enrolled and followed (median follow-up: 32.0 months; 3.0-48.1 months). Three patients had biochemical failure during follow-up. One patient developed pelvic node metastases. All patients were alive. The estimated PFS rates were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 89.8%-100.0%) at 2 years and 78.8% (95%CI: 61.3%-100%) at 3 years. The estimated bFFS rates were 96.4% (95%CI: 89.8%-100%) /86.6%(95%CI: 73.4%-100%) at 2/3 years, respectively. The corresponding rPFS rates were 100% at 2 years and 92.3% (95%CI: 78.9%-100%) at 3 years, respectively. There was only one acute G2 GI adverse event (1/30, 3.33%) of abdominal pain occurred. Two late G2 events (one rectal bleeding and one urinary frequency) were scored (2/30, 6.67%). No ≥G3 events were observed.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest the feasibility, excellent patient tolerance, and encouraging efficacy of post-prostatectomy MRgRT, extending our knowledge of the clinical outcomes of MRgRT and serving as a benchmark for future investigation.

前言:本研究旨在前瞻性探讨磁共振(MR)引导放疗(MRgRT)治疗前列腺切除术后前列腺癌,并报告初步临床结果。方法:所有纳入的患者在1.5T MR集成线性加速器(MR- linac)上进行补救性或辅助性适应性MRgRT。评估胃肠道和泌尿生殖系统毒性。主要终点是Kaplan-Meier (KM)生存分析估计的无进展生存(PFS)率。进展事件定义为首次发生生化失败、放射学进展或死亡。次要终点为生化无失败生存(bFFS)率、放射PFS (rPFS)率和≥G2不良事件。结果:30例前列腺切除术后患者入组并随访(中位随访时间:32.0个月;3.0 - -48.1个月)。3例患者随访时生化指标不达标。1例患者出现盆腔淋巴结转移。所有病人都还活着。估计2年的PFS率为96.4%(95%可信区间[95% ci]: 89.8%-100.0%), 3年的PFS率为78.8% (95% ci: 61.3%-100%)。在2/3年时,估计的最佳闺蜜率分别为96.4% (95%CI: 89.8%-100%)和86.6%(95%CI: 73.4%-100%)。相应的rPFS在2年和3年分别为100%和92.3% (95%CI: 78.9%-100%)。急性G2胃肠道不良事件仅发生1例(1/30,3.33%)腹痛。2例晚期G2事件(1例直肠出血和1例尿频)被评分(2/30,6.67%)。未见≥G3事件。结论:我们的研究结果表明前列腺切除术后MRgRT的可行性、患者良好的耐受性和令人鼓舞的疗效,扩展了我们对MRgRT临床结果的认识,并为未来的研究提供了基准。
{"title":"Post-prostatectomy Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiotherapy on a 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Integrated Linear Accelerator: Feasibility, Toxicity, and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Darren M C Poon, Jing Yuan, Oi Lei Wong, Bin Yang, Mei Yan Tse, Yan Yee Fung, Sin Ting Chiu, Wai Chi Lin, Kin Yin Cheung, George Chiu, Siu Ki Yu","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to prospectively investigate magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) for post-prostatectomy prostate cancer and report preliminary clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All included patients underwent salvage or adjuvant adaptive MRgRT on a 1.5T MR integrated linear accelerator (MR-LINAC). Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were assessed. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. A progression event was defined as the first occurrence of biochemical failure, radiological progression, or death. Secondary endpoints were biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) rate, radiological PFS (rPFS) rate, and ≥G2 adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty post-prostatectomy patients were enrolled and followed (median follow-up: 32.0 months; 3.0-48.1 months). Three patients had biochemical failure during follow-up. One patient developed pelvic node metastases. All patients were alive. The estimated PFS rates were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 89.8%-100.0%) at 2 years and 78.8% (95%CI: 61.3%-100%) at 3 years. The estimated bFFS rates were 96.4% (95%CI: 89.8%-100%) /86.6%(95%CI: 73.4%-100%) at 2/3 years, respectively. The corresponding rPFS rates were 100% at 2 years and 92.3% (95%CI: 78.9%-100%) at 3 years, respectively. There was only one acute G2 GI adverse event (1/30, 3.33%) of abdominal pain occurred. Two late G2 events (one rectal bleeding and one urinary frequency) were scored (2/30, 6.67%). No ≥G3 events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest the feasibility, excellent patient tolerance, and encouraging efficacy of post-prostatectomy MRgRT, extending our knowledge of the clinical outcomes of MRgRT and serving as a benchmark for future investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142779186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Surgical Resection Improves Local Control in Adrenocortical Carcinoma. 手术切除后辅助放疗改善肾上腺皮质癌的局部控制。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14137
Jiawei Zhu, Ruiyi Yan, Jing Shen, Zheng Miao, Jie Shen, Ke Hu, Fuquan Zhang

Aims: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare cancer known for its high recurrence rate. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy on the outcomes of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.

Methods: We examined patients with adrenocortical carcinoma who had undergone curative tumor resection. Tumor stages were classified using the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors staging system. Out of 131 patients, 15 underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients who underwent surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were compared with those who underwent surgery only.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 15) and control groups (n = 30). Local recurrence occurred in three patients (20%) who received adjuvant radiotherapy and 18 patients (60%) in the control group (p < 0.05). The estimated 3-year locoregional-free survival was significantly higher in the adjuvant radiotherapy group (77%) compared to the control group (38.1%, p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in recurrence-free or overall survival between the two groups.

Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy significantly enhances local control of adrenocortical carcinoma. It should be considered a crucial component of treatment, particularly for patients at high risk of recurrence.

目的:肾上腺皮质癌是一种罕见的肿瘤,复发率高。本研究旨在评估术后辅助放疗对肾上腺皮质癌患者预后的影响。方法:对行根治性肿瘤切除术的肾上腺皮质癌患者进行调查。使用欧洲肾上腺肿瘤分期系统研究网络对肿瘤分期进行分类。131例患者中,15例接受了辅助放疗。接受手术和辅助放疗的患者与仅接受手术的患者进行比较。结果:辅助放疗组(n = 15)与对照组(n = 30)基线特征相似。辅助放疗组局部复发3例(20%),对照组局部复发18例(60%)(p < 0.05)。辅助放疗组3年局部无区生存率(77%)明显高于对照组(38.1%,p < 0.05)。然而,两组患者的无复发生存率和总生存率没有显著差异。结论:术后辅助放疗可明显增强肾上腺皮质癌的局部控制。它应被视为治疗的关键组成部分,特别是对于复发风险高的患者。
{"title":"Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Surgical Resection Improves Local Control in Adrenocortical Carcinoma.","authors":"Jiawei Zhu, Ruiyi Yan, Jing Shen, Zheng Miao, Jie Shen, Ke Hu, Fuquan Zhang","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare cancer known for its high recurrence rate. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy on the outcomes of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined patients with adrenocortical carcinoma who had undergone curative tumor resection. Tumor stages were classified using the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors staging system. Out of 131 patients, 15 underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients who underwent surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were compared with those who underwent surgery only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar between the adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 15) and control groups (n = 30). Local recurrence occurred in three patients (20%) who received adjuvant radiotherapy and 18 patients (60%) in the control group (p < 0.05). The estimated 3-year locoregional-free survival was significantly higher in the adjuvant radiotherapy group (77%) compared to the control group (38.1%, p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in recurrence-free or overall survival between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy significantly enhances local control of adrenocortical carcinoma. It should be considered a crucial component of treatment, particularly for patients at high risk of recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142765756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Information in the Hand. That's the Best Way”: Linking Arabic Speaking Patients With Available Resources to Support Their Cancer Care Journey “手中的情报。这是最好的方式”:将讲阿拉伯语的患者与可用资源联系起来,以支持他们的癌症治疗之旅。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14142
Kelsey Serena, Joanna Oakley, Grace Gard, Heidi Hassan, David Attwood, Jo Cockwill, Keith Donohoe, Nora Moubarak, Sheila Patel, Sufi Salieh, Victor Namutwe, Ying Wong, Justin Yeung, Peter Gibbs
{"title":"“Information in the Hand. That's the Best Way”: Linking Arabic Speaking Patients With Available Resources to Support Their Cancer Care Journey","authors":"Kelsey Serena,&nbsp;Joanna Oakley,&nbsp;Grace Gard,&nbsp;Heidi Hassan,&nbsp;David Attwood,&nbsp;Jo Cockwill,&nbsp;Keith Donohoe,&nbsp;Nora Moubarak,&nbsp;Sheila Patel,&nbsp;Sufi Salieh,&nbsp;Victor Namutwe,&nbsp;Ying Wong,&nbsp;Justin Yeung,&nbsp;Peter Gibbs","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14142","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajco.14142","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":"21 1","pages":"46-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142749657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Antibiotics and Chronic Medications on Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 肝细胞癌患者服用抗生素和慢性药物对免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14139
Kennedy Yao Yi Ng, Albert Eng Keong Teo, Sze Huey Tan, Jack Jie En Tan, Desiree Shu Hui Tay, Ailica Wan Xin Lee, Andrea Jing Shi Ang, Lawrence Wen Jun Wong, Su Pin Choo, Han Chong Toh, Suat Ying Lee, Joycelyn Jie Xin Lee, David Wai-Meng Tai

Background and aims: The interaction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and concomitant medications such as antibiotics, metformin, statins, beta-blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and low-dose aspirin has been studied in other malignancies. Our study aims to investigate the relationship between these medications and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who received at least one dose of ICIs between May 2015 and November 2019 was performed. The primary objectives were to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and without medication usage. Log rank test was used to assess for differences in survival. Hazard ratios were reported using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The data cutoff date was December 31, 2020.

Results: A total of 168 patients were included. Median age was 69 years, 85.7% male, 60.7% ECOG 0, 78.0% Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis, 57.7% hepatitis B etiology, 8.9% hepatitis C, and 33.3% nonviral. One hundred three patients (61.3%) received ICI monotherapy, while 38.7% received ICI in combination. Sixty-two patients (36.9%) had concomitant antibiotic usage, 26.8% metformin, 30.4% statin, 31.0% beta-blockers, 60.1% PPI, 6.5% NSAIDs, and 11.9% aspirin. Patients with aHCC receiving antibiotics did not have a shorter OS (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.40, 95% CI 0.94-2.09, p = 0.096) or shorter PFS (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.34, p = 0.73), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics. However, patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology receiving ICI treatment and concurrent antibiotics had shorter OS (5.5 vs. 14.2 months, aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.17-3.17, p = 0.010) and PFS (1.1 vs. 2.6 months, aHR 2.69, 95% CI 1.28-5.65, p = 0.009), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics.

Conclusions: The use of antibiotics may diminish ICI efficacy in patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology, while the use of metformin, statins, beta-blockers, NSAIDs, and aspirin is not associated with significant clinical outcomes.

背景和目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)与抗生素、二甲双胍、他汀类药物、β-受体阻滞剂、质子泵抑制剂(PPI)、非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和小剂量阿司匹林等伴随药物的相互作用已在其他恶性肿瘤中进行过研究。我们的研究旨在探讨这些药物与晚期肝细胞癌(aHCC)患者 ICI 疗效之间的关系:我们对 2015 年 5 月至 2019 年 11 月期间至少接受过一次 ICIs 治疗的患者进行了回顾性研究。主要目的是比较用药和未用药患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用对数秩检验评估生存期的差异。使用 Cox 比例危险回归分析报告危险比。数据截止日期为2020年12月31日:共纳入 168 名患者。中位年龄为 69 岁,85.7% 为男性,60.7% 为 ECOG 0,78.0% 为 Child-Pugh A 型肝硬化,57.7% 为乙型肝炎病因,8.9% 为丙型肝炎,33.3% 为非病毒性肝炎。103 名患者(61.3%)接受了 ICI 单药治疗,38.7% 接受了 ICI 联合治疗。62名患者(36.9%)同时服用抗生素,26.8%服用二甲双胍,30.4%服用他汀类药物,31.0%服用β受体阻滞剂,60.1%服用PPI,6.5%服用非甾体抗炎药,11.9%服用阿司匹林。与未接受抗生素治疗的患者相比,接受抗生素治疗的aHCC患者的OS(调整后HR [aHR] 1.40,95% CI 0.94-2.09,p = 0.096)和PFS(aHR 0.94,95% CI 0.66-1.34,p = 0.73)并没有缩短。然而,与未接受抗生素治疗的患者相比,接受 ICI 治疗并同时使用抗生素的病毒性肝炎 aHCC 患者的 OS(5.5 个月 vs. 14.2 个月,aHR 1.93,95% CI 1.17-3.17,p = 0.010)和 PFS(1.1 个月 vs. 2.6 个月,aHR 2.69,95% CI 1.28-5.65,p = 0.009)更短:结论:抗生素的使用可能会降低病毒性肝炎aHCC患者的ICI疗效,而二甲双胍、他汀类药物、β-受体阻滞剂、非甾体抗炎药和阿司匹林的使用与显著的临床结果无关。
{"title":"Impact of Antibiotics and Chronic Medications on Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Kennedy Yao Yi Ng, Albert Eng Keong Teo, Sze Huey Tan, Jack Jie En Tan, Desiree Shu Hui Tay, Ailica Wan Xin Lee, Andrea Jing Shi Ang, Lawrence Wen Jun Wong, Su Pin Choo, Han Chong Toh, Suat Ying Lee, Joycelyn Jie Xin Lee, David Wai-Meng Tai","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The interaction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and concomitant medications such as antibiotics, metformin, statins, beta-blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and low-dose aspirin has been studied in other malignancies. Our study aims to investigate the relationship between these medications and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who received at least one dose of ICIs between May 2015 and November 2019 was performed. The primary objectives were to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and without medication usage. Log rank test was used to assess for differences in survival. Hazard ratios were reported using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The data cutoff date was December 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 168 patients were included. Median age was 69 years, 85.7% male, 60.7% ECOG 0, 78.0% Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis, 57.7% hepatitis B etiology, 8.9% hepatitis C, and 33.3% nonviral. One hundred three patients (61.3%) received ICI monotherapy, while 38.7% received ICI in combination. Sixty-two patients (36.9%) had concomitant antibiotic usage, 26.8% metformin, 30.4% statin, 31.0% beta-blockers, 60.1% PPI, 6.5% NSAIDs, and 11.9% aspirin. Patients with aHCC receiving antibiotics did not have a shorter OS (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.40, 95% CI 0.94-2.09, p = 0.096) or shorter PFS (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.34, p = 0.73), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics. However, patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology receiving ICI treatment and concurrent antibiotics had shorter OS (5.5 vs. 14.2 months, aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.17-3.17, p = 0.010) and PFS (1.1 vs. 2.6 months, aHR 2.69, 95% CI 1.28-5.65, p = 0.009), as compared to those who did not receive antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of antibiotics may diminish ICI efficacy in patients with aHCC of viral hepatitis etiology, while the use of metformin, statins, beta-blockers, NSAIDs, and aspirin is not associated with significant clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142725151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Case for Shared Decision-making in Oncology and Why the Philippine Healthcare System is Primed for It. 肿瘤学共同决策的理由以及菲律宾医疗保健系统的优势。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14143
Warren Bacorro, Clarito Cairo, Kathleen Baldivia, Aida Bautista, Evelyn Dancel, Jocelyn Mariano, Gil Gonzalez, Teresa Sy Ortin, Rodel Canlas

Shared decision-making is ethically imperative, and is a key component in cost-effective, efficient and equitable cancer care. We review the recent advances in resources, training, tool development, and health policy, supporting the implementation of shared decision-making, and how the Philippines is primed for it.

共同决策在道德上是必要的,也是具有成本效益、高效和公平的癌症护理的关键组成部分。我们回顾了最近在资源、培训、工具开发和卫生政策方面取得的进展,以支持共同决策的实施,以及菲律宾是如何为共同决策做好准备的。
{"title":"The Case for Shared Decision-making in Oncology and Why the Philippine Healthcare System is Primed for It.","authors":"Warren Bacorro, Clarito Cairo, Kathleen Baldivia, Aida Bautista, Evelyn Dancel, Jocelyn Mariano, Gil Gonzalez, Teresa Sy Ortin, Rodel Canlas","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shared decision-making is ethically imperative, and is a key component in cost-effective, efficient and equitable cancer care. We review the recent advances in resources, training, tool development, and health policy, supporting the implementation of shared decision-making, and how the Philippines is primed for it.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142709105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Berberine and Lung Cancer: From Pure Form to Its Nanoformulations. 小檗碱与肺癌:从纯形式到纳米制剂。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14134
Zeinab Tamtaji, Elham Sheikhsagha, Mohammad Behnam, Fatemeh Nabavizadeh, Mehdi Shafiee Ardestani, Fatemeh Rahmati-Dehkordi, Michael Aschner, Hamed Mirzaei, Omid R Tamtaji

Lung cancer is the most fatal cancer worldwide. The etiology of lung cancer has yet to be fully characterized. Smoking and air pollution are several risk factors for lung cancer. Berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid, is an antihyperglycemic, antidepressant, antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer compound. Evidence substantiates that berberine has antitumor effects, exerting its effects by targeting a variety of cellular and molecular processes, such as apoptosis, autophagy, cell cycle arrest, migration, and metastasis. Although the beneficial effects of berberine have been reported, some limitations including low bioavailability and absorption as well as poor aqueous solubility have hindered its clinical application. Nanotechnology and nanodelivery bioformulation approaches may bypass these limitations. In addition, the combination of berberine with other therapies has been shown to result in greater treatment efficacy for lung cancer. Herein, we summarize cellular and molecular pathways that are affected by berberine, its clinical efficacy upon various combinations, and the potential for nanotechnology in lung cancer therapy.

肺癌是全球致死率最高的癌症。肺癌的病因尚未完全确定。吸烟和空气污染是肺癌的几个危险因素。小檗碱是一种异喹啉生物碱,是一种抗高血糖、抗抑郁、抗氧化、抗炎和抗癌化合物。有证据表明,小檗碱具有抗肿瘤作用,它通过靶向多种细胞和分子过程(如细胞凋亡、自噬、细胞周期停滞、迁移和转移)来发挥作用。虽然小檗碱的有益作用已有报道,但其生物利用度和吸收率低以及水溶性差等局限性阻碍了其临床应用。纳米技术和纳米给药生物制剂方法可以绕过这些限制。此外,小檗碱与其他疗法的联合应用已被证明可提高肺癌的治疗效果。在此,我们总结了受小檗碱影响的细胞和分子途径、各种组合的临床疗效以及纳米技术在肺癌治疗中的潜力。
{"title":"Berberine and Lung Cancer: From Pure Form to Its Nanoformulations.","authors":"Zeinab Tamtaji, Elham Sheikhsagha, Mohammad Behnam, Fatemeh Nabavizadeh, Mehdi Shafiee Ardestani, Fatemeh Rahmati-Dehkordi, Michael Aschner, Hamed Mirzaei, Omid R Tamtaji","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14134","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer is the most fatal cancer worldwide. The etiology of lung cancer has yet to be fully characterized. Smoking and air pollution are several risk factors for lung cancer. Berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid, is an antihyperglycemic, antidepressant, antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer compound. Evidence substantiates that berberine has antitumor effects, exerting its effects by targeting a variety of cellular and molecular processes, such as apoptosis, autophagy, cell cycle arrest, migration, and metastasis. Although the beneficial effects of berberine have been reported, some limitations including low bioavailability and absorption as well as poor aqueous solubility have hindered its clinical application. Nanotechnology and nanodelivery bioformulation approaches may bypass these limitations. In addition, the combination of berberine with other therapies has been shown to result in greater treatment efficacy for lung cancer. Herein, we summarize cellular and molecular pathways that are affected by berberine, its clinical efficacy upon various combinations, and the potential for nanotechnology in lung cancer therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142680584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-World Outcomes of Patients Treated With Gemcitabine Using Standardized Dose and Rate and Docetaxel for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma in an Australian Sarcoma Center. 澳大利亚肉瘤中心使用吉西他滨标准化剂量和比例以及多西他赛治疗晚期软组织肉瘤患者的实际效果。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14138
Isabella Wilson, Madeleine Strach, Vivek Bhadri, Michelle Harrison, Whiter Tang, Peter Grimison

Background: Gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) is a common chemotherapy regimen for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The GeDDiS trial compared GD with doxorubicin in the first-line setting, using gemcitabine 675 mg/m2 over a prolonged rate of 90 min-reporting a 20% response rate and 5.4-month median progression-free survival (PFS). We aimed to examine the real-world efficacy and toxicity of GD in our center, using a standardized dose of gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 over 30 min on Days 1 and 8 and intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 over 60 min on Day 8 every 21 days.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with unresectable or metastatic STS receiving GD between July 2018 and October 2022. Data collected included patient and tumor characteristics, dose intensity, toxicity, response, PFS, and overall survival (OS).

Results: Thirty-eight patients were included. Median follow-up was 19 months (range 3-30). Line of treatment (n) was first line (10), second line (13), ≥ third line (15). The median number of cycles was 6. Response rate was 42%, including 5% with a complete response. At the time of data collection, 33 patients had disease progression and 24 patients had died. PFS (median, 6-month rate) was 4.5 months and 44%. OS (median, 12-month rate) was 15 months and 65%. Grade 3/4 toxicity included anemia (21%), neutropenia (5%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and febrile neutropenia (3%).

Conclusion: These data demonstrate the activity of gemcitabine using a standardized dose and rate with docetaxel comparable to other published data and favorable toxicity in a real-life patient population despite altered gemcitabine dosing and a heavily pretreated patient population.

背景:吉西他滨和多西他赛(GD吉西他滨和多西他赛(GD)是治疗转移性软组织肉瘤(STS)的常用化疗方案。GeDDiS试验比较了吉西他滨与多柔比星在一线治疗中的疗效,吉西他滨的剂量为675毫克/平方米,延长时间为90分钟,报告显示反应率为20%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为5.4个月。我们的目标是在本中心研究GD的实际疗效和毒性,采用的标准剂量为吉西他滨900 mg/m2,30分钟/天,第1天和第8天;静脉注射多西他赛75 mg/m2,60分钟/天,第8天,每21天一次:对2018年7月至2022年10月期间接受GD治疗的不可切除或转移性STS患者进行回顾性分析。收集的数据包括患者和肿瘤特征、剂量强度、毒性、反应、PFS和总生存期(OS):共纳入 38 名患者。中位随访时间为 19 个月(3-30 个月)。治疗线(n)为一线(10)、二线(13)、≥三线(15)。应答率为42%,其中5%为完全应答。在收集数据时,33 名患者疾病进展,24 名患者死亡。PFS(中位数,6 个月)为 4.5 个月,占 44%。OS(中位数,12个月)为15个月,占65%。3/4级毒性包括贫血(21%)、中性粒细胞减少(5%)、血小板减少(5%)和发热性中性粒细胞减少(3%):这些数据表明,尽管吉西他滨的剂量发生了改变,而且患者的预处理程度较高,但在现实生活中,吉西他滨与多西他赛的标准化剂量和比例具有与其他已发表数据相当的活性和良好的毒性。
{"title":"Real-World Outcomes of Patients Treated With Gemcitabine Using Standardized Dose and Rate and Docetaxel for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma in an Australian Sarcoma Center.","authors":"Isabella Wilson, Madeleine Strach, Vivek Bhadri, Michelle Harrison, Whiter Tang, Peter Grimison","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) is a common chemotherapy regimen for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The GeDDiS trial compared GD with doxorubicin in the first-line setting, using gemcitabine 675 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over a prolonged rate of 90 min-reporting a 20% response rate and 5.4-month median progression-free survival (PFS). We aimed to examine the real-world efficacy and toxicity of GD in our center, using a standardized dose of gemcitabine 900 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over 30 min on Days 1 and 8 and intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over 60 min on Day 8 every 21 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with unresectable or metastatic STS receiving GD between July 2018 and October 2022. Data collected included patient and tumor characteristics, dose intensity, toxicity, response, PFS, and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight patients were included. Median follow-up was 19 months (range 3-30). Line of treatment (n) was first line (10), second line (13), ≥ third line (15). The median number of cycles was 6. Response rate was 42%, including 5% with a complete response. At the time of data collection, 33 patients had disease progression and 24 patients had died. PFS (median, 6-month rate) was 4.5 months and 44%. OS (median, 12-month rate) was 15 months and 65%. Grade 3/4 toxicity included anemia (21%), neutropenia (5%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and febrile neutropenia (3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data demonstrate the activity of gemcitabine using a standardized dose and rate with docetaxel comparable to other published data and favorable toxicity in a real-life patient population despite altered gemcitabine dosing and a heavily pretreated patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142646595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009-2018. 2009-2018 年澳大利亚新南威尔士州患宫颈癌的土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民妇女与非土著居民妇女在流行病学、人口学、治疗(手术和放疗)和存活率方面的比较。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14140
Susannah Jacob, Gabriel Gabriel, Mei Ling Yap, Shalini Vinod, Kalinda Griffiths, David Sheehan, Susan Anderson, Geoff Delaney

Background: Health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia are significantly worse than in the non-Indigenous population.

Aim: To evaluate demographic factors and treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) rates for cervical cancer and to compare these between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations to identify any differences in outcomes or modifiable treatment differences between the populations.

Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in the state of New South Wales, Australia, diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2009 and 2018 using linked registry, treatment, and death data.

Results: The crude incidence rate for cervical cancer in Aboriginal women in NSW (17.29/100,000) was more than double the rate among non-Aboriginal women (6.77/100,000). Aboriginal women were diagnosed with cervical cancer, including metastatic disease, at a younger age. There was no significant difference in presentation stage, surgery or radiotherapy treatment rates, or overall survival at 5 years between the two populations.

Conclusion: Although access to cancer care looks similar as an aggregate in Aboriginal versus non-Aboriginal populations, there were disparities with reduced access to care (patients who did not receive either radiotherapy or surgery) among Aboriginal patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged or residing in remote areas. The lower age of cancer diagnosis among Aboriginal women may have effects on survivorship, including negative effects on fertility, loss of income, and other personal, social, and economic consequences. Efforts to improve access to care, including screening, diagnosis, and treatment, should be targeted toward younger Aboriginal women and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged or those residing in remote areas.

背景:澳大利亚土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民的健康状况明显不如非土著居民:澳大利亚土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民的健康状况明显差于非土著居民。目的:评估宫颈癌的人口统计因素和治疗率(手术和放疗),并比较土著居民和非土著居民的治疗率,以确定不同人群在治疗结果或可改变的治疗方法方面的差异:使用关联的登记、治疗和死亡数据,对澳大利亚新南威尔士州 2009 年至 2018 年期间确诊为宫颈癌的所有患者进行回顾性队列分析:新南威尔士州原住民妇女的宫颈癌粗发病率(17.29/100,000)是非原住民妇女发病率(6.77/100,000)的两倍多。原住民妇女被诊断出患有宫颈癌(包括转移性疾病)的年龄更小。两种人群在发病分期、手术或放疗治疗率以及 5 年总生存率方面没有明显差异:尽管土著居民与非土著居民获得癌症治疗的总体情况相似,但在社会经济条件较差或居住在偏远地区的土著患者中,获得治疗的机会(未接受放疗或手术治疗的患者)存在差异。原住民妇女确诊癌症的年龄较低,这可能会对她们的生存产生影响,包括对生育的负面影响、收入损失以及其他个人、社会和经济后果。改善医疗服务(包括筛查、诊断和治疗)的工作应针对较年轻的原住民妇女、社会经济条件较差的妇女或居住在偏远地区的妇女。
{"title":"Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009-2018.","authors":"Susannah Jacob, Gabriel Gabriel, Mei Ling Yap, Shalini Vinod, Kalinda Griffiths, David Sheehan, Susan Anderson, Geoff Delaney","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia are significantly worse than in the non-Indigenous population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate demographic factors and treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) rates for cervical cancer and to compare these between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations to identify any differences in outcomes or modifiable treatment differences between the populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in the state of New South Wales, Australia, diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2009 and 2018 using linked registry, treatment, and death data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The crude incidence rate for cervical cancer in Aboriginal women in NSW (17.29/100,000) was more than double the rate among non-Aboriginal women (6.77/100,000). Aboriginal women were diagnosed with cervical cancer, including metastatic disease, at a younger age. There was no significant difference in presentation stage, surgery or radiotherapy treatment rates, or overall survival at 5 years between the two populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although access to cancer care looks similar as an aggregate in Aboriginal versus non-Aboriginal populations, there were disparities with reduced access to care (patients who did not receive either radiotherapy or surgery) among Aboriginal patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged or residing in remote areas. The lower age of cancer diagnosis among Aboriginal women may have effects on survivorship, including negative effects on fertility, loss of income, and other personal, social, and economic consequences. Efforts to improve access to care, including screening, diagnosis, and treatment, should be targeted toward younger Aboriginal women and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged or those residing in remote areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142646582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cancer Clinical Trial Participation Amongst Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Patients in Australia 澳大利亚不同文化和语言患者参与癌症临床试验的情况。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14133
Jaidyn Muhandiramge, Oliver J. Nilsen, Umbreen Hafeez

Purpose

Clinical trials play a large role in oncological. Many barriers to participation in cancer clinical trials exist, including a patient's status as “culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD)”. Globally, it is thought that CALD patients experience lower rates of trial participation, although very few studies quantify rates of cancer clinical trial participation in this group. Our study therefore aims to characterize CALD participation in cancer clinical trials in an Australian setting.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the Cancer Clinical Trials Centre at Austin Health, a large tertiary metropolitan cancer center in Melbourne, Australia. Participation in cancer clinical trials between groups was compared using simple descriptive analysis, Chi-squared analysis, and logistic regression.

Results

Of 2568 patients (mean age 57.9 years, 37% female) offered entry into a cancer clinical trial between 2018 and 2023, 26% were from a CALD background (n = 678), and 9% had a preferred language other than English (n = 219). A greater proportion of non-CALD patients participated in a cancer clinical trial compared with CALD patients (37% versus 33% respectively, p = 0.04). In logistic regression models, Arabic (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21–0.93 [univariate]) and Greek (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.91 [multivariate]) language groups, along with overall CALD status (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67–0.99 [univariate]) were associated with lower cancer clinical trial participation.

Conclusion

We found that CALD patients, those born in non-English speaking countries, and specific language groups, were associated with lower cancer clinical trial participation.

目的:临床试验在肿瘤治疗中发挥着重要作用。参与癌症临床试验存在许多障碍,其中包括患者的 "文化和语言多样性(CALD)"身份。在全球范围内,人们认为 CALD 患者的试验参与率较低,但很少有研究对这一群体的癌症临床试验参与率进行量化。因此,我们的研究旨在了解 CALD 参与澳大利亚癌症临床试验的情况:我们对澳大利亚墨尔本奥斯汀健康中心(Austin Health)癌症临床试验中心的数据进行了回顾性分析。采用简单描述性分析、Chi-squared 分析和逻辑回归对不同组别参与癌症临床试验的情况进行了比较:在2018年至2023年期间,有2568名患者(平均年龄57.9岁,37%为女性)获准参加癌症临床试验,其中26%的患者有CALD背景(n=678),9%的患者首选语言为英语以外的语言(n=219)。与 CALD 患者相比,非 CALD 患者参与癌症临床试验的比例更高(分别为 37% 和 33%,p = 0.04)。在逻辑回归模型中,阿拉伯语组(OR,0.46;95% CI,0.21-0.93 [单变量])和希腊语组(OR,0.54;95% CI,0.31-0.91 [多变量])以及总体 CALD 状态(OR,0.81;95% CI,0.67-0.99 [单变量])与较低的癌症临床试验参与率相关:我们发现,CALD 患者、出生在非英语国家的患者以及特定语言群体与癌症临床试验参与率较低有关。
{"title":"Cancer Clinical Trial Participation Amongst Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Patients in Australia","authors":"Jaidyn Muhandiramge,&nbsp;Oliver J. Nilsen,&nbsp;Umbreen Hafeez","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14133","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ajco.14133","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Clinical trials play a large role in oncological. Many barriers to participation in cancer clinical trials exist, including a patient's status as “culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD)”. Globally, it is thought that CALD patients experience lower rates of trial participation, although very few studies quantify rates of cancer clinical trial participation in this group. Our study therefore aims to characterize CALD participation in cancer clinical trials in an Australian setting.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the Cancer Clinical Trials Centre at Austin Health, a large tertiary metropolitan cancer center in Melbourne, Australia. Participation in cancer clinical trials between groups was compared using simple descriptive analysis, Chi-squared analysis, and logistic regression.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 2568 patients (mean age 57.9 years, 37% female) offered entry into a cancer clinical trial between 2018 and 2023, 26% were from a CALD background (<i>n</i> = 678), and 9% had a preferred language other than English (<i>n</i> = 219). A greater proportion of non-CALD patients participated in a cancer clinical trial compared with CALD patients (37% versus 33% respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.04). In logistic regression models, Arabic (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21–0.93 [univariate]) and Greek (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.91 [multivariate]) language groups, along with overall CALD status (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67–0.99 [univariate]) were associated with lower cancer clinical trial participation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We found that CALD patients, those born in non-English speaking countries, and specific language groups, were associated with lower cancer clinical trial participation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":"21 1","pages":"58-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1