首页 > 最新文献

Cortex最新文献

英文 中文
Did H.M. exhibit accelerated long-term forgetting? Measuring forgetting in amnesia H.M. 是否表现出加速的长期遗忘?测量遗忘症患者的遗忘
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.09.003
Nan Peng, Umberto Noè, Sergio Della Sala
The early investigations of patient H.M. inaugurated the modern era of memory research. During the 1970s and 1980s, a key debate over whether H.M. with bilateral medial temporal lobe lesions exhibited accelerated long-term forgetting attracted an increasing interest in forgetting research among amnestic patients. Huppert and Piercy (1979) examined H.M.’s performance in visual recognition at 10-minute, 1-day, and 7-day intervals and suggested that H.M. was subjected to rapid forgetting compared with Korsakoff patients and healthy participants reported in Huppert and Piercy (1978). In contrast, Freed et al. (1987) employed the same experimental paradigm and concluded that forgetting rates in H.M. did not differ from those in healthy controls. These incompatible findings highlighted a methodological challenge in measuring forgetting in the cross-group comparison design, where closely equalising the initial performance between patient and control groups is usually suggested. The re-analysis in this viewpoint, using both linear- and nonlinear-based modelling, reconciled the discrepancy between the aforementioned studies. Our results indicated that the rate of forgetting in H.M. did not differ from that in healthy controls, regardless of whether the initial performance was closely matched. Here, we suggest that the cross-group comparisons in forgetting studies do not necessarily seek a perfect match in initial performance unless the risks of confounding encoding and retrieval processes can be effectively controlled.
对患者H.M.的早期研究开创了现代记忆研究的先河。20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代,关于双侧内侧颞叶病变的 H.M. 是否表现出加速的长期遗忘的争论引起了人们对失忆症患者遗忘研究的兴趣。Huppert 和 Piercy(1979 年)研究了 H.M.在 10 分钟、1 天和 7 天时间间隔内的视觉识别表现,认为与 Huppert 和 Piercy(1978 年)报告的 Korsakoff 患者和健康参与者相比,H.M.的遗忘速度更快。与此相反,Freed 等人(1987 年)采用了相同的实验范式,并得出结论认为,H.M.患者的遗忘率与健康对照组的遗忘率没有差异。这些互不相容的研究结果凸显了在跨组比较设计中测量遗忘的方法学挑战,在这种设计中,通常建议患者组和对照组之间的初始表现密切相等。本研究采用线性和非线性建模方法重新分析了上述研究之间的差异。我们的结果表明,无论初始成绩是否完全匹配,H.M.患者的遗忘率与健康对照组的遗忘率并无差异。在此,我们建议,遗忘研究中的跨组比较不一定要寻求初始表现的完全匹配,除非编码和检索过程的混淆风险能得到有效控制。
{"title":"Did H.M. exhibit accelerated long-term forgetting? Measuring forgetting in amnesia","authors":"Nan Peng,&nbsp;Umberto Noè,&nbsp;Sergio Della Sala","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The early investigations of patient H.M. inaugurated the modern era of memory research. During the 1970s and 1980s, a key debate over whether H.M. with bilateral medial temporal lobe lesions exhibited accelerated long-term forgetting attracted an increasing interest in forgetting research among amnestic patients. Huppert and Piercy (1979) examined H.M.’s performance in visual recognition at 10-minute, 1-day, and 7-day intervals and suggested that H.M. was subjected to rapid forgetting compared with Korsakoff patients and healthy participants reported in Huppert and Piercy (1978). In contrast, Freed et al. (1987) employed the same experimental paradigm and concluded that forgetting rates in H.M. did not differ from those in healthy controls. These incompatible findings highlighted a methodological challenge in measuring forgetting in the cross-group comparison design, where closely equalising the initial performance between patient and control groups is usually suggested. The re-analysis in this viewpoint, using both linear- and nonlinear-based modelling, reconciled the discrepancy between the aforementioned studies. Our results indicated that the rate of forgetting in H.M. did not differ from that in healthy controls, regardless of whether the initial performance was closely matched. Here, we suggest that the cross-group comparisons in forgetting studies do not necessarily seek a perfect match in initial performance unless the risks of confounding encoding and retrieval processes can be effectively controlled.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"180 ","pages":"Pages 35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224002466/pdfft?md5=1f3f79f1e4570cacb354caabde060b0e&pid=1-s2.0-S0010945224002466-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142312336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is semantic dementia an outdated entity? 语义痴呆是否已经过时?
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.09.002
Serge Belliard , Catherine Merck
Does it still make clinical sense to talk about semantic dementia? For more than 10 years, some researchers and clinicians have highlighted the need for new diagnostic criteria, arguing for this entity either to be redefined or, more recently, to be divided into two partially distinct entities, each with its own supposed characteristics, namely the semantic variant primary progressive aphasia and the semantic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Why such a shift? Is it no longer appropriate to talk about semantic dementia? Is it really useful to divide the concept of semantic dementia into verbal and socioemotional semantic subcomponents? Does this proposal have any clinical merit or does it solely reflect theoretical considerations? To shed light on these questions, the purpose of the present review was to explore theoretical considerations on the nature of the knowledge that is disturbed in this disease which might justify such terminological changes.
谈论语义痴呆是否仍有临床意义?十多年来,一些研究人员和临床医生一直强调需要新的诊断标准,主张要么重新定义这一实体,要么最近将其分为两个部分不同的实体,即语义变异型原发性进行性失语症和语义行为变异型额颞叶痴呆症,每个实体都有自己的假定特征。为什么会有这样的转变?谈论语义痴呆是否不再合适?将语义痴呆的概念分为言语和社会情感语义两个子部分真的有用吗?这一提议是否具有临床价值,还是仅仅反映了理论上的考虑?为了阐明这些问题,本综述的目的是探讨关于这种疾病中受到干扰的知识的性质的理论考虑,这可能证明这种术语变化是合理的。
{"title":"Is semantic dementia an outdated entity?","authors":"Serge Belliard ,&nbsp;Catherine Merck","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Does it still make clinical sense to talk about semantic dementia? For more than 10 years, some researchers and clinicians have highlighted the need for new diagnostic criteria, arguing for this entity either to be redefined or, more recently, to be divided into two partially distinct entities, each with its own supposed characteristics, namely the semantic variant primary progressive aphasia and the semantic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Why such a shift? Is it no longer appropriate to talk about semantic dementia? Is it really useful to divide the concept of semantic dementia into verbal and socioemotional semantic subcomponents? Does this proposal have any clinical merit or does it solely reflect theoretical considerations? To shed light on these questions, the purpose of the present review was to explore theoretical considerations on the nature of the knowledge that is disturbed in this disease which might justify such terminological changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"180 ","pages":"Pages 64-77"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adynamic spoken language in corpus callosum dysgenesis 胼胝体发育不良的非能动口语
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.021
Megan S. Barker , Jacquelyn L. Knight , Ryan J. Dean , Linda J. Richards , Gail A. Robinson
Corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD) is a congenital brain malformation that occurs when the development of the corpus callosum is disrupted, either partially or completely. The cognitive outcomes in individuals with CCD vary greatly, but generally the neuropsychological profile is characterised by slow processing speed, poor transfer of interhemispheric sensory-motor information, and impaired complex problem solving. Core language skills are often preserved in CCD, but there is some evidence that complex language may be impaired. Thus, the current study sought to examine whether spontaneous speech output was reduced in a cohort of individuals with CCD compared to age-matched controls. We further explored a series of factors that may be contributing to poor spontaneous speech in CCD, such as difficulties generating, selecting, and sequencing ideas for expression, as well as apathy and slowed processing speed. A cohort of 25 individuals with CCD and 39 neurotypical controls were enrolled in this study. Participants completed a picture description task to measure spontaneous speech output, alongside a series of cognitive and language baseline tests. Verbal and nonverbal fluency tasks gauged idea generation and sequencing, and sentence-level selection tasks measured idea selection. We found that, despite having largely intact core language skills, individuals with CCD produced significantly less spontaneous speech on the picture description task than controls. This language profile may be described as “adynamic”. Further, we found that poor spontaneous speech output in CCD was related to problems generating ideas for expression, as individuals with CCD performed below controls on the verbal and nonverbal fluency tasks. Exploratory analyses revealed that apathy and slowed processing speed may be contributing factors. Adynamia in CCD is a novel finding that may be an intervention target for improving communication skills in this population.
胼胝体发育不良(CCD)是一种先天性脑畸形,是指胼胝体的发育部分或完全中断。CCD 患者的认知结果差异很大,但一般来说,其神经心理学特征是处理速度缓慢、半球间感觉运动信息传递不畅以及复杂问题解决能力受损。CCD 患者的核心语言能力通常得以保留,但有证据表明复杂语言能力可能会受损。因此,本研究试图探讨与年龄匹配的对照组相比,CCD 患者的自发言语输出是否会减少。我们还进一步探讨了一系列可能导致 CCD 患者自发言语能力低下的因素,如产生、选择和排序表达想法的困难,以及冷漠和处理速度减慢等。本研究共招募了 25 名 CCD 患者和 39 名神经典型对照者。参与者在完成一系列认知和语言基线测试的同时,还完成了一项图片描述任务,以测量自发言语输出。言语和非言语流畅性任务测量想法的产生和排序,句子级选择任务测量想法的选择。我们发现,尽管 CCD 患者的核心语言技能基本完好,但他们在图片描述任务中的自发言语能力明显低于对照组。这种语言特征可被称为 "非动态"。此外,我们还发现,CCD 患者的自发言语能力差与产生表达想法的问题有关,因为 CCD 患者在言语和非言语流畅性任务中的表现低于对照组。探索性分析表明,冷漠和处理速度减慢可能是诱因。CCD 中的 "失语症 "是一项新发现,可作为改善该人群交流技能的干预目标。
{"title":"Adynamic spoken language in corpus callosum dysgenesis","authors":"Megan S. Barker ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn L. Knight ,&nbsp;Ryan J. Dean ,&nbsp;Linda J. Richards ,&nbsp;Gail A. Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD) is a congenital brain malformation that occurs when the development of the corpus callosum is disrupted, either partially or completely. The cognitive outcomes in individuals with CCD vary greatly, but generally the neuropsychological profile is characterised by slow processing speed, poor transfer of interhemispheric sensory-motor information, and impaired complex problem solving. Core language skills are often preserved in CCD, but there is some evidence that complex language may be impaired. Thus, the current study sought to examine whether spontaneous speech output was reduced in a cohort of individuals with CCD compared to age-matched controls. We further explored a series of factors that may be contributing to poor spontaneous speech in CCD, such as difficulties generating, selecting, and sequencing ideas for expression, as well as apathy and slowed processing speed. A cohort of 25 individuals with CCD and 39 neurotypical controls were enrolled in this study. Participants completed a picture description task to measure spontaneous speech output, alongside a series of cognitive and language baseline tests. Verbal and nonverbal fluency tasks gauged idea generation and sequencing, and sentence-level selection tasks measured idea selection. We found that, despite having largely intact core language skills, individuals with CCD produced significantly less spontaneous speech on the picture description task than controls. This language profile may be described as “adynamic”. Further, we found that poor spontaneous speech output in CCD was related to problems generating ideas for expression, as individuals with CCD performed below controls on the verbal and nonverbal fluency tasks. Exploratory analyses revealed that apathy and slowed processing speed may be contributing factors. Adynamia in CCD is a novel finding that may be an intervention target for improving communication skills in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"180 ","pages":"Pages 42-54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224002442/pdfft?md5=7293f4043c318b3e5bf99a1a79046bd1&pid=1-s2.0-S0010945224002442-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142312335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The fickleness of forgetting: When, why, and how do patient groups differ (or not)? 遗忘的善变:患者群体何时、为何以及如何存在差异(或不存在差异)?
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.08.002
Michael D. Kopelman
{"title":"The fickleness of forgetting: When, why, and how do patient groups differ (or not)?","authors":"Michael D. Kopelman","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142260912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Baseline multimodal imaging to predict longitudinal clinical decline in atypical Alzheimer's disease 预测非典型阿尔茨海默病纵向临床衰退的基线多模态成像。
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.020
Ryan P. Coburn , Jonathan Graff-Radford , Mary M. Machulda , Christopher G. Schwarz , Val J. Lowe , David T. Jones , Clifford R. Jack Jr. , Keith A. Josephs , Jennifer L. Whitwell , Hugo Botha
There are recognized neuroimaging regions of interest in typical Alzheimer's disease which have been used to track disease progression and aid prognostication. However, there is a need for validated baseline imaging markers to predict clinical decline in atypical Alzheimer's Disease. We aimed to address this need by producing models from baseline imaging features using penalized regression and evaluating their predictive performance on various clinical measures.
Baseline multimodal imaging data, in combination with clinical testing data at two time points from 46 atypical Alzheimer's Disease patients with a diagnosis of logopenic progressive aphasia (N = 24) or posterior cortical atrophy (N = 22), were used to generate our models. An additional 15 patients (logopenic progressive aphasia = 7, posterior cortical atrophy = 8), whose data were not used in our original analysis, were used to test our models. Patients underwent MRI, FDG-PET and Tau-PET imaging and a full neurologic battery at two time points. The Schaefer functional atlas was used to extract network-based and regional gray matter volume or PET SUVR values from baseline imaging. Penalized regression (Elastic Net) was used to create models to predict scores on testing at Time 2 while controlling for baseline performance, education, age, and sex. In addition, we created models using clinical or Meta Region of Interested (ROI) data to serve as comparisons.
We found the degree of baseline involvement on neuroimaging was predictive of future performance on cognitive testing while controlling for the above measures on all three imaging modalities. In many cases, model predictability improved with the addition of network-based neuroimaging data to clinical data. We also found our network-based models performed superiorly to the comparison models comprised of only clinical or a Meta ROI score.
Creating predictive models from imaging studies at a baseline time point that are agnostic to clinical diagnosis as we have described could prove invaluable in both the clinical and research setting, particularly in the development and implementation of future disease modifying therapies.
在典型的阿尔茨海默病中,有公认的神经影像感兴趣区,这些感兴趣区已被用于跟踪疾病进展和帮助预后。然而,目前还需要经过验证的基线成像标记来预测非典型阿尔茨海默病的临床衰退。为了满足这一需求,我们使用惩罚回归法根据基线成像特征建立模型,并评估其对各种临床指标的预测性能。基线多模态成像数据与两个时间点的临床测试数据相结合,用于生成我们的模型,这些数据来自 46 名诊断为对数开放性进行性失语(24 人)或后皮质萎缩(22 人)的非典型阿尔茨海默病患者。另外 15 例患者(对数开放性进行性失语症 = 7 例,后部皮质萎缩 = 8 例)的数据未用于我们最初的分析,这些数据被用于检验我们的模型。患者在两个时间点接受了 MRI、FDG-PET 和 Tau-PET 成像检查和全面的神经系统检查。Schaefer 功能图谱用于从基线成像中提取基于网络的区域灰质体积或 PET SUVR 值。在控制基线表现、教育程度、年龄和性别的情况下,我们使用惩罚回归(Elastic Net)建立模型来预测第 2 个时间点的测试得分。此外,我们还使用临床或 Meta 感兴趣区域 (ROI) 数据创建了模型,作为比较。我们发现,在控制所有三种成像模式的上述指标的情况下,神经成像的基线受累程度可预测认知测试的未来表现。在许多情况下,将基于网络的神经成像数据添加到临床数据中后,模型的可预测性得到了提高。我们还发现,与仅由临床数据或 Meta ROI 评分组成的对比模型相比,我们基于网络的模型表现更为出色。从基线时间点的成像研究中创建与临床诊断无关的预测模型,就像我们所描述的那样,在临床和研究环境中,尤其是在未来疾病调整疗法的开发和实施中,可能会被证明是非常有价值的。
{"title":"Baseline multimodal imaging to predict longitudinal clinical decline in atypical Alzheimer's disease","authors":"Ryan P. Coburn ,&nbsp;Jonathan Graff-Radford ,&nbsp;Mary M. Machulda ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Schwarz ,&nbsp;Val J. Lowe ,&nbsp;David T. Jones ,&nbsp;Clifford R. Jack Jr. ,&nbsp;Keith A. Josephs ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Whitwell ,&nbsp;Hugo Botha","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.020","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are recognized neuroimaging regions of interest in typical Alzheimer's disease which have been used to track disease progression and aid prognostication. However, there is a need for validated baseline imaging markers to predict clinical decline in atypical Alzheimer's Disease. We aimed to address this need by producing models from baseline imaging features using penalized regression and evaluating their predictive performance on various clinical measures.</div><div>Baseline multimodal imaging data, in combination with clinical testing data at two time points from 46 atypical Alzheimer's Disease patients with a diagnosis of logopenic progressive aphasia (N = 24) or posterior cortical atrophy (N = 22), were used to generate our models. An additional 15 patients (logopenic progressive aphasia = 7, posterior cortical atrophy = 8), whose data were not used in our original analysis, were used to test our models. Patients underwent MRI, FDG-PET and Tau-PET imaging and a full neurologic battery at two time points. The Schaefer functional atlas was used to extract network-based and regional gray matter volume or PET SUVR values from baseline imaging. Penalized regression (Elastic Net) was used to create models to predict scores on testing at Time 2 while controlling for baseline performance, education, age, and sex. In addition, we created models using clinical or Meta Region of Interested (ROI) data to serve as comparisons.</div><div>We found the degree of baseline involvement on neuroimaging was predictive of future performance on cognitive testing while controlling for the above measures on all three imaging modalities. In many cases, model predictability improved with the addition of network-based neuroimaging data to clinical data. We also found our network-based models performed superiorly to the comparison models comprised of only clinical or a Meta ROI score.</div><div>Creating predictive models from imaging studies at a baseline time point that are agnostic to clinical diagnosis as we have described could prove invaluable in both the clinical and research setting, particularly in the development and implementation of future disease modifying therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"180 ","pages":"Pages 18-34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142281515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cover figure 封面人物
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(24)00236-3
{"title":"Cover figure","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0010-9452(24)00236-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0010-9452(24)00236-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"179 ","pages":"Page e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142168831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cover figure 封面人物
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(24)00229-6
{"title":"Cover figure","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0010-9452(24)00229-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0010-9452(24)00229-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"178 ","pages":"Page e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142050139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Writing in two different scripts promotes fine motor control 用两种不同的字体书写可促进精细动作控制
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.016
G. Alhaddad , M. Dione , J. Danna , F.-X. Alario , A. Honnorat , J.-L. Velay , J.-C. Gilhodes , M. Longcamp

Biscriptuality is the ability to write in two different scripts. Achieving handwriting expertise in a single script demands years of intensive practice, and these demands are even stronger when two scripts must be mastered. Biscriptuality could thus impact the cognitive and motor skills underlying graphomotor control. Here, we aimed at establishing that biscriptuality enhances graphomotor control, and at testing whether biscriptuals have better fine motor skills and working memory performance compared to Latin monoscriptuals.

We found that biscriptuals perform better than monoscriptuals on graphomotor tasks, and on 3 types of fine motor control tasks indexing dexterity, motor timing under spatial constraints, and spontaneous motor tempo; the two groups did not significantly differ in their working memory performance. These results demonstrate that writing expertise widely impacts the organization of the motor system.

双书写能力是指用两种不同字体书写的能力。要想掌握单一字体的书写技巧,需要多年的强化练习,而如果必须掌握两种字体,这种要求就会更高。因此,双文字能力可能会影响图形运动控制的认知和运动技能。我们发现,双脚本者在图形运动任务上的表现优于单脚本者,在3种精细运动控制任务上的表现也优于单脚本者,这3种任务包括灵巧性指标、空间限制下的运动计时和自发运动节奏;两组人在工作记忆表现上没有显著差异。这些结果表明,写作专长对运动系统的组织有着广泛的影响。
{"title":"Writing in two different scripts promotes fine motor control","authors":"G. Alhaddad ,&nbsp;M. Dione ,&nbsp;J. Danna ,&nbsp;F.-X. Alario ,&nbsp;A. Honnorat ,&nbsp;J.-L. Velay ,&nbsp;J.-C. Gilhodes ,&nbsp;M. Longcamp","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biscriptuality is the ability to write in two different scripts. Achieving handwriting expertise in a single script demands years of intensive practice, and these demands are even stronger when two scripts must be mastered. Biscriptuality could thus impact the cognitive and motor skills underlying graphomotor control. Here, we aimed at establishing that biscriptuality enhances graphomotor control, and at testing whether biscriptuals have better fine motor skills and working memory performance compared to Latin monoscriptuals.</p><p>We found that biscriptuals perform better than monoscriptuals on graphomotor tasks, and on 3 types of fine motor control tasks indexing dexterity, motor timing under spatial constraints, and spontaneous motor tempo; the two groups did not significantly differ in their working memory performance. These results demonstrate that writing expertise widely impacts the organization of the motor system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"179 ","pages":"Pages 247-260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142098382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multisensory integration and motor resonance in the primary motor cortex 初级运动皮层的多感官整合与运动共振
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.015
Serena Giurgola , Emanuele Lo Gerfo , Alessandro Farnè , Alice C. Roy , Nadia Bolognini

Humans are endowed with a motor system that resonates to speech sounds, but whether concurrent visual information from lip movements can improve speech perception at a motor level through multisensory integration mechanisms remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of the study was to explore behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of multisensory influences on motor resonance in speech perception. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the left lip muscle (orbicularis oris) representation in the primary motor cortex, were recorded in healthy participants during the presentation of syllables in unimodal (visual or auditory) or multisensory (audio-visual) congruent or incongruent conditions. At the behavioral level, subjects showed better syllable identification in the congruent audio-visual condition as compared to the unimodal conditions, hence showing a multisensory enhancement effect. Accordingly, at the neurophysiological level, increased MEPs amplitudes were found in the congruent audio-visual condition, as compared to the unimodal ones. Incongruent audio-visual syllables resulting in illusory percepts did not increase corticospinal excitability, which in fact was comparable to that induced by the real perception of the same syllable. In conclusion, seeing and hearing congruent bilabial syllables increases the excitability of the lip representation in the primary motor cortex, hence documenting that multisensory integration can facilitate speech processing by influencing motor resonance. These findings highlight the modulation role of multisensory processing showing that it can boost speech perception and that multisensory interactions occur not only within higher-order regions, but also within primary motor areas, as shown by corticospinal excitability changes.

人类拥有能与语音产生共鸣的运动系统,但同时从嘴唇运动中获得的视觉信息是否能通过多感官整合机制在运动水平上改善语音感知仍是未知数。因此,本研究旨在探索多感官对言语感知中运动共振影响的行为学和神经生理学相关性。研究人员在单模态(视觉或听觉)或多模态(视听)一致或不一致的条件下播放音节时,通过单脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS)在初级运动皮层的左唇部肌肉(口轮匝肌)上记录运动诱发电位(MEPs)。在行为层面上,与单模态条件相比,受试者在视听一致条件下表现出更好的音节识别能力,从而显示出多感官增强效应。相应地,在神经生理学层面上,与单模态条件相比,在视听一致条件下,受试者的 MEPs 振幅增大。不一致的视听音节导致的虚幻感知并没有增加皮质神经元的兴奋性,事实上,这种兴奋性与真实感知相同音节时所引起的兴奋性相当。总之,看到和听到一致的双唇音节会增加初级运动皮层中唇表征的兴奋性,从而证明多感官整合可以通过影响运动共振来促进语音处理。这些发现凸显了多感官处理的调节作用,表明多感官处理可促进言语感知,而且多感官相互作用不仅发生在高阶区域,也发生在初级运动区域,皮质脊髓兴奋性变化就表明了这一点。
{"title":"Multisensory integration and motor resonance in the primary motor cortex","authors":"Serena Giurgola ,&nbsp;Emanuele Lo Gerfo ,&nbsp;Alessandro Farnè ,&nbsp;Alice C. Roy ,&nbsp;Nadia Bolognini","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Humans are endowed with a motor system that resonates to speech sounds, but whether concurrent visual information from lip movements can improve speech perception at a motor level through multisensory integration mechanisms remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of the study was to explore behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of multisensory influences on motor resonance in speech perception. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the left lip muscle (orbicularis oris) representation in the primary motor cortex, were recorded in healthy participants during the presentation of syllables in unimodal (visual or auditory) or multisensory (audio-visual) congruent or incongruent conditions. At the behavioral level, subjects showed better syllable identification in the congruent audio-visual condition as compared to the unimodal conditions, hence showing a multisensory enhancement effect. Accordingly, at the neurophysiological level, increased MEPs amplitudes were found in the congruent audio-visual condition, as compared to the unimodal ones. Incongruent audio-visual syllables resulting in illusory percepts did not increase corticospinal excitability, which in fact was comparable to that induced by the real perception of the same syllable. In conclusion, seeing and hearing congruent bilabial syllables increases the excitability of the lip representation in the primary motor cortex, hence documenting that multisensory integration can facilitate speech processing by influencing motor resonance. These findings highlight the modulation role of multisensory processing showing that it can boost speech perception and that multisensory interactions occur not only within higher-order regions, but also within primary motor areas, as shown by corticospinal excitability changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"179 ","pages":"Pages 235-246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142098540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interaction of spatial attention and the associated reward value of audiovisual objects 空间注意力与视听对象相关奖励价值的相互作用
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.013
Roman Vakhrushev , Arezoo Pooresmaeili

Reward value and selective attention both enhance the representation of sensory stimuli at the earliest stages of processing. It is still debated whether and how reward-driven and attentional mechanisms interact to influence perception. Here we ask whether the interaction between reward value and selective attention depends on the sensory modality through which the reward information is conveyed. Human participants first learned the reward value of uni-modal visual and auditory stimuli during a conditioning phase. Subsequently, they performed a target detection task on bimodal stimuli containing a previously rewarded stimulus in one, both, or neither of the modalities. Additionally, participants were required to focus their attention on one side and only report targets on the attended side. Our results showed a strong modulation of visual and auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) by spatial attention. We found no main effect of reward value but importantly we found an interaction effect as the strength of attentional modulation of the ERPs was significantly affected by the reward value. When reward effects were examined separately with respect to each modality, auditory value-driven modulation of attention was found to dominate the ERP effects whereas visual reward value on its own led to no effect, likely due to its interference with the target processing. These results inspire a two-stage model where first the salience of a high reward stimulus is enhanced on a local priority map specific to each sensory modality, and at a second stage reward value and top-down attentional mechanisms are integrated across sensory modalities to affect perception.

奖励价值和选择性注意都会在加工的最初阶段增强感官刺激的表征。奖励驱动机制和注意机制是否以及如何相互作用影响知觉,目前仍存在争议。在这里,我们想知道奖励价值和选择性注意之间的相互作用是否取决于传递奖励信息的感官模式。人类参与者首先在条件反射阶段学会了单模态视觉和听觉刺激的奖励价值。随后,他们对双模态刺激物进行目标检测任务,这些刺激物包含之前在一种模态、两种模态或两种模态中都获得奖励的刺激物。此外,参与者需要将注意力集中在一侧,并且只报告被注意一侧的目标。我们的研究结果表明,空间注意力对视觉和听觉事件相关电位(ERPs)有很强的调节作用。我们没有发现奖励值的主效应,但重要的是我们发现了交互效应,因为注意力对 ERP 的调节强度受到奖励值的显著影响。在对每种模式的奖励效应进行单独研究时,我们发现由听觉价值驱动的注意力调节在 ERP效应中占主导地位,而视觉奖励价值本身不会产生任何效应,这可能是由于它干扰了目标处理。这些结果启发了一个两阶段模型:首先,高奖励刺激的显著性在每种感官模式特有的局部优先图谱上得到增强;在第二阶段,奖励价值和自上而下的注意机制在各种感官模式之间得到整合,从而影响感知。
{"title":"Interaction of spatial attention and the associated reward value of audiovisual objects","authors":"Roman Vakhrushev ,&nbsp;Arezoo Pooresmaeili","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reward value and selective attention both enhance the representation of sensory stimuli at the earliest stages of processing. It is still debated whether and how reward-driven and attentional mechanisms interact to influence perception. Here we ask whether the interaction between reward value and selective attention depends on the sensory modality through which the reward information is conveyed. Human participants first learned the reward value of uni-modal visual and auditory stimuli during a conditioning phase. Subsequently, they performed a target detection task on bimodal stimuli containing a previously rewarded stimulus in one, both, or neither of the modalities. Additionally, participants were required to focus their attention on one side and only report targets on the attended side. Our results showed a strong modulation of visual and auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) by spatial attention. We found no main effect of reward value but importantly we found an interaction effect as the strength of attentional modulation of the ERPs was significantly affected by the reward value. When reward effects were examined separately with respect to each modality, auditory value-driven modulation of attention was found to dominate the ERP effects whereas visual reward value on its own led to no effect, likely due to its interference with the target processing. These results inspire a two-stage model where first the salience of a high reward stimulus is enhanced on a local priority map specific to each sensory modality, and at a second stage reward value and top-down attentional mechanisms are integrated across sensory modalities to affect perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"179 ","pages":"Pages 271-285"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001094522400217X/pdfft?md5=5efde16fc13965264151c786e6477f2f&pid=1-s2.0-S001094522400217X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142098537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cortex
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1