首页 > 最新文献

Energy Policy最新文献

英文 中文
Production of energy from renewable sources and financial performance of European utilities: A panel-data analysis 可再生能源的生产与欧洲公用事业公司的财务业绩:面板数据分析
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114323

Energy transition has become a priority for utilities worldwide.

Renewable electricity generation represents one of the pillars of the European decarbonization policy and is included among eligible activities in the Taxonomy Regulation.

The limited literature regarding the effects of investments in renewables on the financial performance of firms is fundamentally split in two lines: the first is focused on stock returns, the second concerns the determinants of the financial performance which is measured either through risk or accounting metrics. A limited set of studies has assessed the effects of investments in renewable power generation on the performance of utilities. In this article three linear regression analysis conducted on a panel-data composed of firm-year observations for 64 electric utilities from continental Europe between 2011 and 2020 are presented. The analysis has focused on: (i) profitability (Return-On-Asset), (ii) market valuation (Tobin's q) (iii) risk (Weighted Average Cost of Capital).

The results show that the renewable generation share is significantly and positively correlated with the first two indicators, while not correlated with the cost of capital.

This could represent a constraint to investments in renewable generation capacity with a negative impact on the achievement of the targets of the European decarbonization policy.

可再生能源发电是欧洲去碳化政策的支柱之一,并被列入《分类条例》中的合格活动。有关可再生能源投资对企业财务业绩影响的有限文献从根本上分为两类:第一类侧重于股票回报,第二类涉及财务业绩的决定因素,财务业绩通过风险或会计指标来衡量。评估可再生能源发电投资对公用事业公司业绩影响的研究为数不多。本文对 2011 年至 2020 年期间欧洲大陆 64 家电力公司的公司年观测数据进行了三次线性回归分析。结果表明,可再生能源发电份额与前两个指标显著正相关,而与资本成本不相关。这可能会制约可再生能源发电能力的投资,对欧洲去碳化政策目标的实现产生负面影响。
{"title":"Production of energy from renewable sources and financial performance of European utilities: A panel-data analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114323","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114323","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy transition has become a priority for utilities worldwide.</p><p>Renewable electricity generation represents one of the pillars of the European decarbonization policy and is included among eligible activities in the Taxonomy Regulation.</p><p>The limited literature regarding the effects of investments in renewables on the financial performance of firms is fundamentally split in two lines: the first is focused on stock returns, the second concerns the determinants of the financial performance which is measured either through risk or accounting metrics. A limited set of studies has assessed the effects of investments in renewable power generation on the performance of utilities. In this article three linear regression analysis conducted on a panel-data composed of firm-year observations for 64 electric utilities from continental Europe between 2011 and 2020 are presented. The analysis has focused on: (i) profitability (Return-On-Asset), (ii) market valuation (Tobin's q) (iii) risk (Weighted Average Cost of Capital).</p><p>The results show that the renewable generation share is significantly and positively correlated with the first two indicators, while not correlated with the cost of capital.</p><p>This could represent a constraint to investments in renewable generation capacity with a negative impact on the achievement of the targets of the European decarbonization policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003434/pdfft?md5=ed48b0ef63b3a1dd42634947e4e9a8cd&pid=1-s2.0-S0301421524003434-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Electric vehicle supply chain under dual-credit and subsidy policies: Technology innovation, infrastructure construction and coordination 双重信贷和补贴政策下的电动汽车供应链:技术创新、基础设施建设与协调
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114339

China’s pursuit of carbon neutrality has propelled the new energy vehicle industry to global prominence. However, the development of electric vehicles (EVs) is hampered by consumers’ range anxiety, which arises from concerns about battery endurance and the accessibility of charging and swapping stations. To tackle this challenge, the government has implemented some policies, such as dual-credit policy, station-building subsidy and battery R&D subsidy. Considering these initiatives, this study delves into the EV supply chain, examining how policies interact to influence the optimal strategies of EV manufacturers and battery suppliers in terms of technology innovation and infrastructure construction. By constructing a two-tier supply chain game model, we analyze three different scenarios and explore supply chain coordination through contract mechanisms. Our findings reveal the benefits of combined policies in certain situations, highlight the synergy between policies, emphasize the role of policies in shaping contract designs, and provide insights into selecting appropriate contract mechanisms. Furthermore, we offer managerial implications for responding to government incentive policies, aiming to alleviate range anxiety and foster sustainable growth in the new energy vehicle industry.

中国对碳中和的追求推动新能源汽车产业在全球崭露头角。然而,消费者对电池续航能力和充换电站便利性的担忧导致的续航焦虑阻碍了电动汽车(EV)的发展。为应对这一挑战,政府实施了一些政策,如双积分政策、建站补贴和电池研发补贴。考虑到这些举措,本研究深入电动汽车供应链,探讨政策如何相互作用,影响电动汽车制造商和电池供应商在技术创新和基础设施建设方面的最优策略。通过构建双层供应链博弈模型,我们分析了三种不同的情景,并探讨了通过合同机制协调供应链的问题。我们的研究结果揭示了在某些情况下综合政策的益处,突出了政策之间的协同作用,强调了政策在合同设计中的作用,并为选择合适的合同机制提供了启示。此外,我们还提供了应对政府激励政策的管理启示,旨在缓解新能源汽车行业的续航焦虑并促进其可持续增长。
{"title":"Electric vehicle supply chain under dual-credit and subsidy policies: Technology innovation, infrastructure construction and coordination","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114339","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114339","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China’s pursuit of carbon neutrality has propelled the new energy vehicle industry to global prominence. However, the development of electric vehicles (EVs) is hampered by consumers’ range anxiety, which arises from concerns about battery endurance and the accessibility of charging and swapping stations. To tackle this challenge, the government has implemented some policies, such as dual-credit policy, station-building subsidy and battery R&amp;D subsidy. Considering these initiatives, this study delves into the EV supply chain, examining how policies interact to influence the optimal strategies of EV manufacturers and battery suppliers in terms of technology innovation and infrastructure construction. By constructing a two-tier supply chain game model, we analyze three different scenarios and explore supply chain coordination through contract mechanisms. Our findings reveal the benefits of combined policies in certain situations, highlight the synergy between policies, emphasize the role of policies in shaping contract designs, and provide insights into selecting appropriate contract mechanisms. Furthermore, we offer managerial implications for responding to government incentive policies, aiming to alleviate range anxiety and foster sustainable growth in the new energy vehicle industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003598/pdfft?md5=46e15a2a2b20c4eb65eed51b6bcbde02&pid=1-s2.0-S0301421524003598-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142162232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From policy to practice: The role of national policy instruments and social barriers in UK energy efficiency adoption in households 从政策到实践:国家政策工具和社会障碍在英国家庭能源效率采用中的作用
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114308

This paper investigates the adoption trends for energy efficiency (EE) measures in the UK residential sector and the extent to which national-level EE policies impact households' willingness to adopt EE measures and technologies. Using survey data from a representative sample of more than 2000 households across the UK and discrete choice models, this research examines the preferences given to different policy schemes such as tax rebates, grants, loans, easing administrative barriers or information campaigns; and its role on household decisions to adopt EE measures. We find that national-level policies in the form of grants and subsidies, information campaigns on savings and a reduction of administrative barriers would positively impact the probability of a household to adopt such measures. Differences are found between the policy drivers in the adoption of low-cost EE measures e.g. loft insulation vs. High-cost EE measures e.g. heat pumps. Importantly, our results highlight the role of policy mixes in fostering the adoption of EE measures in UK. In combination with other policies, tax credits can be effective in fostering the adoption on EE measures. Our findings have implications for policymakers seeking to enhance the effectiveness of EE policies and address social challenges to promote sustainable energy use.

本文研究了英国住宅领域采用能源效率(EE)措施的趋势,以及国家层面的 EE 政策在多大程度上影响了家庭采用 EE 措施和技术的意愿。本研究利用英国 2000 多个家庭的代表性样本调查数据和离散选择模型,研究了不同政策方案(如退税、赠款、贷款、放宽行政障碍或信息宣传)的偏好,及其对家庭采用节能措施决策的作用。我们发现,赠款和补贴形式的国家级政策、有关储蓄的宣传活动以及减少行政障碍都会对家庭采取此类措施的概率产生积极影响。在采用低成本节能措施(如阁楼隔热)与采用高成本节能措施(如热泵)的政策驱动因素之间存在差异。重要的是,我们的研究结果强调了政策组合在促进英国家庭采用节能措施中的作用。结合其他政策,税收减免可以有效地促进节能措施的采用。我们的研究结果对政策制定者提高能源效率政策的有效性和应对社会挑战以促进可持续能源利用具有启示意义。
{"title":"From policy to practice: The role of national policy instruments and social barriers in UK energy efficiency adoption in households","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114308","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114308","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the adoption trends for energy efficiency (EE) measures in the UK residential sector and the extent to which national-level EE policies impact households' willingness to adopt EE measures and technologies. Using survey data from a representative sample of more than 2000 households across the <span>UK</span> and discrete choice models, this research examines the preferences given to different policy schemes such as tax rebates, grants, loans, easing administrative barriers or information campaigns; and its role on household decisions to adopt EE measures. We find that national-level policies in the form of grants and subsidies, information campaigns on savings and a reduction of administrative barriers would positively impact the probability of a household to adopt such measures. Differences are found between the policy drivers in the adoption of low-cost EE measures e.g. loft insulation vs. High-cost EE measures e.g. heat pumps. Importantly, our results highlight the role of policy mixes in fostering the adoption of EE measures in UK. In combination with other policies, tax credits can be effective in fostering the adoption on EE measures. Our findings have implications for policymakers seeking to enhance the effectiveness of EE policies and address social challenges to promote sustainable energy use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003288/pdfft?md5=c554264934ba562b2dc79c2ed4305a52&pid=1-s2.0-S0301421524003288-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of digital technology innovation on green total-factor energy efficiency in China: Does economic development matter? 数字技术创新对中国绿色全要素能效的影响:经济发展重要吗?
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114342

Exploring the role of digital technology innovation (DTI) on green total-factor energy efficiency (GTFEE) has been theoretically and empirically neglected, despite its recognition as a crucial catalyst for energy transition. This study investigates the nexus between DTI and GTFEE amidst China's uneven regional economic development. Utilizing a panel dataset spanning 30 provinces in China during 2012–2020, we employ the two-stage super network SBM model incorporating undesired outputs (two-stage super-NSBM) to quantify GTFEE. Furthermore, we harness the partially linear function-coefficient (PLFC) model to scrutinize DTI's impact on GTFEE across varying economic development levels. Our findings unveil that: DTI significantly augments GTFEE, particularly in eastern provinces and during the 13th Five-Year Plan period. DTI's influence on GTFEE is contingent upon economic development levels. Specifically, when per capita GDP surpasses 24150.80 yuan, the marginal enhancement effect emerges, progressively intensifying until reaching a steady state. Across different economic development stages, DTI primarily bolsters GTFEE by impacting green total-factor energy usage efficiency (GTFEUE) rather than green total-factor pollution treatment efficiency (GTFPTE). These insights suggest that to expedite GTFEE improvement, the government should foster DTI while accounting for regional economic development disparities.

尽管数字技术创新(DTI)被认为是能源转型的重要催化剂,但从理论和实证角度来看,数字技术创新(DTI)对绿色全要素能效(GTFEE)的作用一直被忽视。本研究探讨了在中国区域经济发展不平衡的情况下,数字技术创新与 GTFEE 之间的关系。利用 2012-2020 年间横跨中国 30 个省份的面板数据集,我们采用了包含非期望输出的两阶段超级网络 SBM 模型(两阶段超级 NSBM)来量化 GTFEE。此外,我们还利用部分线性函数系数(PLFC)模型来研究 DTI 在不同经济发展水平下对 GTFEE 的影响。我们的研究结果表明DTI 显着增加了 GTFEE,尤其是在东部省份和 "十三五 "期间。DTI 对 GTFEE 的影响取决于经济发展水平。具体而言,当人均 GDP 超过 24150.80 元时,边际增强效应显现,并逐步增强,直至达到稳定状态。在不同的经济发展阶段,DTI 主要通过影响绿色全要素能源利用效率(GTFEUE)而非绿色全要素污染处理效率(GTFPTE)来提高 GTFEE。这些启示表明,要加快提高 GTFEE,政府应在考虑地区经济发展差异的同时促进 DTI 的发展。
{"title":"The impact of digital technology innovation on green total-factor energy efficiency in China: Does economic development matter?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114342","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114342","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exploring the role of digital technology innovation (DTI) on green total-factor energy efficiency (GTFEE) has been theoretically and empirically neglected, despite its recognition as a crucial catalyst for energy transition. This study investigates the nexus between DTI and GTFEE amidst China's uneven regional economic development. Utilizing a panel dataset spanning 30 provinces in China during 2012–2020, we employ the two-stage super network SBM model incorporating undesired outputs (two-stage super-NSBM) to quantify GTFEE. Furthermore, we harness the partially linear function-coefficient (PLFC) model to scrutinize DTI's impact on GTFEE across varying economic development levels. Our findings unveil that: DTI significantly augments GTFEE, particularly in eastern provinces and during the 13th Five-Year Plan period. DTI's influence on GTFEE is contingent upon economic development levels. Specifically, when per capita GDP surpasses 24150.80 yuan, the marginal enhancement effect emerges, progressively intensifying until reaching a steady state. Across different economic development stages, DTI primarily bolsters GTFEE by impacting green total-factor energy usage efficiency (GTFEUE) rather than green total-factor pollution treatment efficiency (GTFPTE). These insights suggest that to expedite GTFEE improvement, the government should foster DTI while accounting for regional economic development disparities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Empirical field evaluation of self-consumption promoting regulation of household battery energy storage systems 对促进家用电池储能系统自我消费调节的实地实证评估
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114343

An increasing number of battery energy storage systems are installed in households globally. These systems are influenced by distinct regulatory frameworks. Internationally, a consolidated regulatory framework for household battery energy storage has yet to emerge. The widely proliferated self-consumption regulation promotes the utilization of battery storage systems to maximize the consumption of self-generated electricity from PV panels. Yet, a large-scale empirical field study evaluating the effect of such regulation is missing. To this end, we present an empirical evaluation of a unique dataset describing the operation of 947 household battery energy storage systems over one year, propose alternative regulatory regimes that we evaluate based on a simulation with the same battery profiles and a survey with 196 respondents evaluating household attitudes towards their battery storage. The results show that the self-consumption promoting regulation leads to almost no additional welfare for the system and even adds costs in some cases that are being socialized among energy consumers. Furthermore, minimal adjustments in the regulation might considerably increase the value of battery storage for households and the system and we find that trust in the supplier might suffice to have households adopt alternative battery storage profiles.

全球越来越多的家庭安装了电池储能系统。这些系统受到不同监管框架的影响。在国际上,针对家用电池储能的综合监管框架尚未出现。广泛传播的自我消费法规提倡利用电池储能系统最大限度地消耗光伏电池板自发的电能。然而,目前还缺少一项大规模的实地实证研究来评估此类法规的效果。为此,我们对一个独特的数据集进行了实证评估,该数据集描述了 947 个家庭电池储能系统一年来的运行情况,并提出了替代监管制度,我们根据对相同电池情况的模拟和对 196 个受访者进行的调查,评估了家庭对其电池储能的态度。结果表明,促进自我消费的监管制度几乎不会给系统带来额外的福利,在某些情况下甚至会增加能源消费者的社会成本。此外,对法规进行最小限度的调整可能会大大提高电池储能对家庭和系统的价值,而且我们发现,对供应商的信任可能足以让家庭采用其他电池储能方案。
{"title":"Empirical field evaluation of self-consumption promoting regulation of household battery energy storage systems","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114343","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114343","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An increasing number of battery energy storage systems are installed in households globally. These systems are influenced by distinct regulatory frameworks. Internationally, a consolidated regulatory framework for household battery energy storage has yet to emerge. The widely proliferated self-consumption regulation promotes the utilization of battery storage systems to maximize the consumption of self-generated electricity from PV panels. Yet, a large-scale empirical field study evaluating the effect of such regulation is missing. To this end, we present an empirical evaluation of a unique dataset describing the operation of 947 household battery energy storage systems over one year, propose alternative regulatory regimes that we evaluate based on a simulation with the same battery profiles and a survey with 196 respondents evaluating household attitudes towards their battery storage. The results show that the self-consumption promoting regulation leads to almost no additional welfare for the system and even adds costs in some cases that are being socialized among energy consumers. Furthermore, minimal adjustments in the regulation might considerably increase the value of battery storage for households and the system and we find that trust in the supplier might suffice to have households adopt alternative battery storage profiles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152400363X/pdfft?md5=6a011eb7663fb2ad4cd0dca2d64cdeb6&pid=1-s2.0-S030142152400363X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining disparities in energy poverty and indoor environmental quality satisfaction among Canadian households 研究加拿大家庭在能源贫困和室内环境质量满意度方面的差异
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114319

This study explores the relationship between income, dwelling quality, and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) perceptions. We conducted a survey of approximately 1100 Canadian residents from a variety of socioeconomic groups capturing a representative sample of Canadian society. It employs new thresholds to align the subjective perceptions of energy poverty with objective measures. Statistical analyses reveal notable differences in IEQ perceptions among income groups. While high-income respondents consistently express higher satisfaction levels across multiple IEQ domains than middle-income ones, the latter report higher satisfaction levels than those with lower incomes. Wealthier households typically have more rooms, with all income groups reporting a median of three bedrooms. Lower-income respondents tend to spend a larger proportion of their income on energy bills per capita, despite consuming less energy per capita. Around 41% of lower-income respondents report facing challenges in paying utility bills, compared to 24% and 16% in middle- and upper-income groups, respectively. We present energy poverty thresholds that are customized based on survey responses from the different income groups, informing policymakers to consider downward revisions of thresholds to address the subjective aspect of energy poverty better. The unequal IEQ and energy poverty perceptions we document across income groups highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve welfare among vulnerable households.

本研究探讨了收入、住宅质量和室内环境质量(IEQ)认知之间的关系。我们对来自不同社会经济群体的约 1100 名加拿大居民进行了调查,以获取具有代表性的加拿大社会样本。它采用了新的阈值,使能源贫困的主观感受与客观测量相一致。统计分析显示,不同收入群体对 IEQ 的认知存在明显差异。虽然高收入受访者在多个 IEQ 领域的满意度一直高于中等收入受访者,但后者的满意度高于低收入受访者。较富裕的家庭通常拥有更多的房间,所有收入群体报告的中位数都是三间卧室。尽管人均能耗较低,但低收入受访者在能源账单上的支出往往占人均收入的比例较大。约 41% 的低收入受访者表示在支付公用事业账单方面面临挑战,而在中等收入和高收入群体中,这一比例分别为 24% 和 16%。我们提出了根据不同收入群体的调查反馈定制的能源贫困阈值,建议政策制定者考虑下调阈值,以更好地解决能源贫困的主观方面问题。我们记录的不同收入群体对 IEQ 和能源贫困的不平等认识,突出表明需要采取有针对性的干预措施来改善弱势家庭的福利。
{"title":"Examining disparities in energy poverty and indoor environmental quality satisfaction among Canadian households","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114319","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114319","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the relationship between income, dwelling quality, and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) perceptions. We conducted a survey of approximately 1100 Canadian residents from a variety of socioeconomic groups capturing a representative sample of Canadian society. It employs new thresholds to align the subjective perceptions of energy poverty with objective measures. Statistical analyses reveal notable differences in IEQ perceptions among income groups. While high-income respondents consistently express higher satisfaction levels across multiple IEQ domains than middle-income ones, the latter report higher satisfaction levels than those with lower incomes. Wealthier households typically have more rooms, with all income groups reporting a median of three bedrooms. Lower-income respondents tend to spend a larger proportion of their income on energy bills per capita, despite consuming less energy per capita. Around 41% of lower-income respondents report facing challenges in paying utility bills, compared to 24% and 16% in middle- and upper-income groups, respectively. We present energy poverty thresholds that are customized based on survey responses from the different income groups, informing policymakers to consider downward revisions of thresholds to address the subjective aspect of energy poverty better. The unequal IEQ and energy poverty perceptions we document across income groups highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve welfare among vulnerable households.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Readiness for a clean energy future: Prevalence, perceptions, and barriers to adoption of electric stoves and solar panels in New York city 迎接清洁能源的未来:纽约市采用电炉和太阳能电池板的普及率、观念和障碍
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114301

Adoption of electric stoves and rooftop solar can reduce fossil-fuel reliance and improve health by decreasing indoor air pollution and alleviating energy insecurity. This study assessed prevalence and perceptions of these clean-energy technologies to increase adoption in New York City (NYC). A representative survey of 1950 NYC adults was conducted from February 28 to April 1, 2022. Fourteen percent of people had an electric stove; 86% had gas stoves. Black, Latino/a, and lower-income residents were more likely to have electric stoves than White and higher-income residents. Only 14% of residents were interested in switching from gas to electric stoves. Of the 71% with gas stoves uninterested in switching, nearly half (45%) preferred gas cooking, particularly among White and higher-income residents, indicating a large opportunity to shift preferences. About 5% used solar for their home or building; another 77% were interested in solar. Of the 18% uninterested in solar, reasons included lack of agency, confusion about operation, and costs. Education about health and cost benefits, induction technology, how to transition, available subsidies, and other efforts to reduce adoption barriers can support clean technology uptake. Residential clean energy metrics should be tracked regularly to ensure that technology adoption proceeds equitably.

采用电炉和屋顶太阳能可以减少对化石燃料的依赖,并通过减少室内空气污染和缓解能源不安全问题来改善健康状况。本研究评估了这些清洁能源技术的普及率和认知度,以提高纽约市(NYC)的采用率。2022 年 2 月 28 日至 4 月 1 日,对 1950 名纽约市成年人进行了一项具有代表性的调查。14%的人拥有电炉;86%的人拥有燃气炉。黑人、拉丁裔和低收入居民比白人和高收入居民更有可能使用电炉。只有 14% 的居民有兴趣从燃气灶改用电炉。在没有兴趣改用燃气灶的 71% 的居民中,近一半(45%)的人喜欢用燃气做饭,尤其是在白人和高收入居民中,这表明有很大的机会可以改变他们的偏好。约 5%的家庭或建筑使用太阳能;另有 77% 的人对太阳能感兴趣。在对太阳能不感兴趣的 18% 的人中,原因包括缺乏机构、对操作和成本感到困惑。开展有关健康和成本效益、感应技术、如何过渡、可用补贴等方面的教育,以及其他减少采用障碍的努力,可以支持清洁技术的采用。应定期跟踪住宅清洁能源指标,以确保技术采用的公平性。
{"title":"Readiness for a clean energy future: Prevalence, perceptions, and barriers to adoption of electric stoves and solar panels in New York city","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114301","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114301","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adoption of electric stoves and rooftop solar can reduce fossil-fuel reliance and improve health by decreasing indoor air pollution and alleviating energy insecurity. This study assessed prevalence and perceptions of these clean-energy technologies to increase adoption in New York City (NYC). A representative survey of 1950 NYC adults was conducted from February 28 to April 1, 2022. Fourteen percent of people had an electric stove; 86% had gas stoves. Black, Latino/a, and lower-income residents were more likely to have electric stoves than White and higher-income residents. Only 14% of residents were interested in switching from gas to electric stoves. Of the 71% with gas stoves uninterested in switching, nearly half (45%) preferred gas cooking, particularly among White and higher-income residents, indicating a large opportunity to shift preferences. About 5% used solar for their home or building; another 77% were interested in solar. Of the 18% uninterested in solar, reasons included lack of agency, confusion about operation, and costs. Education about health and cost benefits, induction technology, how to transition, available subsidies, and other efforts to reduce adoption barriers can support clean technology uptake. Residential clean energy metrics should be tracked regularly to ensure that technology adoption proceeds equitably.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003215/pdfft?md5=a054b40cee322024b8071b9f3514daab&pid=1-s2.0-S0301421524003215-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Energy transition in OECD countries: Catalyzing governance quality for SDG 7 attainment 经合组织国家的能源转型:提高治理质量,促进可持续发展目标 7 的实现
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114315

In alignment with the objectives of the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26) Summit, this study proposes a sustainable policy framework to facilitate energy transition by enhancing governance quality in OECD countries. The study employs Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) and Bootstrapped Quantile Regression (BSQR) techniques, examining data from 1995 to 2020. Our findings demonstrate that governance quality plays a crucial moderating role, enabling environmental stringency policies, environmental taxes, and technological advancements to effectively promote energy transition in OECD countries. Furthermore, the results indicate that environmental taxes positively impact energy transition at lower quantiles (20th and 40th); however, an adverse effect is observed at upper quantiles (60th and 80th). Based on these findings, this study recommends comprehensive policies for OECD countries that align with Sustainable Development Goal 7, emphasizing the importance of contextual factors in policy implementation for sustainable energy transitions.

为配合第 26 届缔约方大会(COP26)峰会的目标,本研究提出了一个可持续的政策框架,通过提高经合组织国家的治理质量来促进能源转型。研究采用了矩量回归法(MMQR)和引导量回归法(BSQR)技术,考察了 1995 年至 2020 年的数据。我们的研究结果表明,治理质量发挥着至关重要的调节作用,使环境严格政策、环境税和技术进步能够有效促进经合组织国家的能源转型。此外,研究结果表明,环境税对较低数量级(第 20 位和第 40 位)的能源转型有积极影响;但对较高数量级(第 60 位和第 80 位)的能源转型有不利影响。基于这些研究结果,本研究为经合组织国家提出了与可持续发展目标 7 相符的综合政策建议,强调了可持续能源转型政策实施过程中背景因素的重要性。
{"title":"Energy transition in OECD countries: Catalyzing governance quality for SDG 7 attainment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114315","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114315","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In alignment with the objectives of the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26) Summit, this study proposes a sustainable policy framework to facilitate energy transition by enhancing governance quality in OECD countries. The study employs Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) and Bootstrapped Quantile Regression (BSQR) techniques, examining data from 1995 to 2020. Our findings demonstrate that governance quality plays a crucial moderating role, enabling environmental stringency policies, environmental taxes, and technological advancements to effectively promote energy transition in OECD countries. Furthermore, the results indicate that environmental taxes positively impact energy transition at lower quantiles (20th and 40th); however, an adverse effect is observed at upper quantiles (60th and 80th). Based on these findings, this study recommends comprehensive policies for OECD countries that align with Sustainable Development Goal 7, emphasizing the importance of contextual factors in policy implementation for sustainable energy transitions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of electricity market reform on renewable energy production 电力市场改革对可再生能源生产的影响
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114306

Deregulation in the electricity market can potentially improve electricity production structure and allocate resources more efficiently through competition. This paper leverages the recent electricity market reform in China and uses the difference-in-difference method to study the impact of China’s electricity market reform on the installed capacity and electricity generation from different sources. Our results show that installed capacity growth has slowed down after the electricity market reform in the pilot provinces, suggesting more efficient utilization of existing capacity and reduced need for new capacity. The reform has also boosted the generation of hydropower and suppressed the generation of non-hydro power, such as wind and solar power due to the cost differences in renewable energy production. The reform has also increased the annual utilization hours of wind and solar generators. Our results have important implication on the polices to encourage grid stability and competitiveness with the rapid development of wind and solar power generation.

放松对电力市场的管制有可能改善电力生产结构,并通过竞争更有效地配置资源。本文借助中国近期的电力市场改革,采用差分法研究了中国电力市场改革对装机容量和不同来源发电量的影响。研究结果表明,电力市场改革试点省份的装机容量增长放缓,表明现有装机容量的利用效率提高,对新增装机容量的需求减少。由于可再生能源生产的成本差异,改革还促进了水力发电,抑制了风力和太阳能等非水力发电。改革还提高了风能和太阳能发电机的年利用小时数。随着风能和太阳能发电的快速发展,我们的研究结果对鼓励电网稳定性和竞争力的政策具有重要意义。
{"title":"The impact of electricity market reform on renewable energy production","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114306","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114306","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deregulation in the electricity market can potentially improve electricity production structure and allocate resources more efficiently through competition. This paper leverages the recent electricity market reform in China and uses the difference-in-difference method to study the impact of China’s electricity market reform on the installed capacity and electricity generation from different sources. Our results show that installed capacity growth has slowed down after the electricity market reform in the pilot provinces, suggesting more efficient utilization of existing capacity and reduced need for new capacity. The reform has also boosted the generation of hydropower and suppressed the generation of non-hydro power, such as wind and solar power due to the cost differences in renewable energy production. The reform has also increased the annual utilization hours of wind and solar generators. Our results have important implication on the polices to encourage grid stability and competitiveness with the rapid development of wind and solar power generation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Debt as catalyst: Empowering renewable energy in developing countries 以债务为催化剂:增强发展中国家可再生能源的能力
IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114336

Financing renewable energy (RE) is essential for transitioning to green energy. Debt finance plays a significant role in shifting from conventional to green energy, with the global percentage of debt financing increasing from 23% in 2013 to 56% in 2020. Previous studies have examined the impact of green finance on RE. This study examines the impact of debt financing on RE capacity in 12 developing countries from 2000 to 2020. Green finance covers various financial tools for environmental sustainability. Therefore, a distinction between green and debt financing impact on RE is essential. The study uncovers a U-shaped relationship between debt financing and RE, suggesting that while initial debt financing may hinder RE deployment beyond a certain level, debt financing promotes RE deployment. The study also draws attention to the influence of financial market conditions, indicating that developing countries can effectively utilize debt finance in favorable financial markets to negate the initial negative impact on RE deployment. These findings offer financial strategists and policymakers valuable insights to support debt financing and increase RE deployment.

为可再生能源(RE)融资对于向绿色能源过渡至关重要。债务融资在从传统能源向绿色能源转变的过程中发挥着重要作用,全球债务融资的比例将从 2013 年的 23% 增加到 2020 年的 56%。以往的研究探讨了绿色金融对可再生能源的影响。本研究探讨了 2000 年至 2020 年债务融资对 12 个发展中国家可再生能源能力的影响。绿色金融涵盖促进环境可持续性的各种金融工具。因此,必须区分绿色融资和债务融资对可再生能源的影响。研究发现,债务融资与可再生能源之间存在 U 型关系,这表明,虽然最初的债务融资可能会阻碍超过一定水平的可再生能源部署,但债务融资会促进可再生能源的部署。研究还提请注意金融市场条件的影响,表明发展中国家可以在有利的金融市场上有效利用债务融资,以消除对可再生能源部署的初始负面影响。这些发现为金融战略家和政策制定者提供了支持债务融资和增加可再生能源部署的宝贵见解。
{"title":"Debt as catalyst: Empowering renewable energy in developing countries","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114336","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114336","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Financing renewable energy (RE) is essential for transitioning to green energy. Debt finance plays a significant role in shifting from conventional to green energy, with the global percentage of debt financing increasing from 23% in 2013 to 56% in 2020. Previous studies have examined the impact of green finance on RE. This study examines the impact of debt financing on RE capacity in 12 developing countries from 2000 to 2020. Green finance covers various financial tools for environmental sustainability. Therefore, a distinction between green and debt financing impact on RE is essential. The study uncovers a U-shaped relationship between debt financing and RE, suggesting that while initial debt financing may hinder RE deployment beyond a certain level, debt financing promotes RE deployment. The study also draws attention to the influence of financial market conditions, indicating that developing countries can effectively utilize debt finance in favorable financial markets to negate the initial negative impact on RE deployment. These findings offer financial strategists and policymakers valuable insights to support debt financing and increase RE deployment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142129741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Energy Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1