Journal of breath research最新文献

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are the most common chronic respiratory diseases. In middle-aged and elderly patients, it is difficult to distinguish between COPD and asthma based on clinical symptoms and pulmonary function examinations in clinical practice. Thus, an accurate and reliable inspection method is required. In this study, we aimed to identify breath biomarkers and evaluate the accuracy of breathomics-based methods for discriminating between COPD and asthma. In this multi-center cross-sectional study, exhaled breath samples were collected from 89 patients with COPD and 73 with asthma and detected on a high-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPPI-TOFMS) platform from 20 October 2022, to 20 May 2023, in four hospitals. Data analysis was performed from 15 June 2023 to 16 August 2023. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated to assess the overall performance of the volatile organic component (VOC)-based COPD and asthma discrimination models. Potential VOC markers related to COPD and asthma were also analyzed. The age of all participants ranged from to 18-86 years, and 54 (33.3%) were men. The age [median (minimum, maximum)] of COPD and asthma participants were 66.0 (46.0, 86.0), and 44.0 (17.0, 80.0). The male and female ratio of COPD and asthma participants were 14/75 and 40/33, respectively. Based on breathomics feature selection, ten VOCs were identified as COPD and asthma discrimination biomarkers via breath testing. The joint panel of these ten VOCs achieved an area under the curve of 0.843, sensitivity of 75.9%, specificity of 87.5%, and accuracy of 80.0% in COPD and asthma discrimination. Furthermore, the VOCs detected in the breath samples were closely related to the clinical characteristics of COPD and asthma. The VOC-based COPD and asthma discrimination model showed good accuracy, providing a new strategy for clinical diagnosis. Breathomics-based methods may play an important role in the diagnosis of COPD and asthma.

The Peppermint Initiative, established within the International Association of Breath Research, introduced the peppermint protocol, a breath analysis benchmarking effort designed to address the lack of inter-comparability of outcomes across different breath sampling techniques and analytical platforms. Benchmarking with gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) using peppermint has been previously reported however, coupling micro-thermal desorption (µTD) to GC-IMS has not yet, been benchmarked for breath analysis. To benchmarkµTD-GC-IMS for breath analysis using the peppermint protocol. Ten healthy participants (4 males and 6 females, aged 20-73 years), were enrolled to give six breath samples into Nalophan bags via a modified peppermint protocol. Breath sampling after peppermint ingestion occurred over 6 h att= 60, 120, 200, 280, and 360 min. The breath samples (120 cm³) were pre-concentrated in theµTD before being transferred into the GC-IMS for detection. Data was processed using VOCal, including background subtractions, peak volume measurements, and room air assessment. During peppermint washout, eucalyptol showed the highest change in concentration levels, followed byα-pinene andβ-pinene. The reproducibility of the technique for breath analysis was demonstrated by constructing logarithmic washout curves, with the average linearity coefficient ofR²= 0.99. The time to baseline (benchmark) value for the eucalyptol washout was 1111 min (95% CI: 529-1693 min), obtained by extrapolating the average logarithmic washout curve. The study demonstrated thatµTD-GC-IMS is reproducible and suitable technique for breath analysis, with benchmark values for eucalyptol comparable to the gold standard GC-MS.

Analyzing exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with an electronic nose (e-nose) is emerging in medical diagnostics as a non-invasive, quick, and sensitive method for disease detection and monitoring. This study investigates if activities like spirometry or physical exercise affect exhaled VOCs measurements in asthmatics and healthy individuals, a crucial step for e-nose technology's validation for clinical use. The study analyzed exhaled VOCs using an e-nose in 27 healthy individuals and 27 patients with stable asthma, before and after performing spirometry and climbing five flights of stairs. Breath samples were collected using a validated technique and analyzed with a Cyranose 320 e-nose. In healthy controls, the exhaled VOCs spectrum remained unchanged after both lung function test and exercise. In asthmatics, principal component analysis and subsequent discriminant analysis revealed significant differences post-spirometry (vs. baseline 66.7% cross validated accuracy [CVA],p< 0.05) and exercise (vs. baseline 70.4% CVA,p< 0.05). E-nose measurements in healthy individuals are consistent, unaffected by spirometry or physical exercise. However, in asthma patients, significant changes in exhaled VOCs were detected post-activities, indicating airway responses likely due to constriction or inflammation, underscoring the e-nose's potential for respiratory condition diagnosis and monitoring.

Standardisation is the road to improvement! If we all measure exhaled nitric oxide (NO) the same way, we will be successful in having data to make reference questions. Many research groups have published their reference equation, but most differ considerably. About 25 years ago, using the flow of 50 ml s^-1was recommended and not using a nose clip. When collecting data worldwide, we still see publications that do not indicate what flow was used and that nose clip was utilised. Three things are needed: the analysing method, a flow recording and a filled-in nitric oxide questionnaire. The analysing method is because the techniques have different sensitivity, response times and calibration. The flow of 50 ml s^-1is on the steep part of the NO output curve; therefore, we need to record the flow to analyse repeated measurements or compare results. The NO questionnaire controls individual factors that may influence the NO measurements, i.e. food intake, smoking and upper airway infection. An important tool in following old and new disease treatments, at home or in health care, is exhaled biomarkers. If we follow the standardisation we have agreed upon, we will be able to have data to say what a high or a low exhaled NO value is.

Despite the widespread use of dental restorative materials, little information exists in the literature regarding their potential impact on bad breath. This in vitro study aims to fill this gap by investigating the influence of different restorative materials on the release of hydrogen sulfide (H₂S). Thirteen diverse dental restorative materials, including composites, flowable composites, glass ionomer restorative materials, high-copper amalgam, and CAD-CAM blocks, were examined. Cellulose Sponge models were used as negative and positive control. All samples were prepared with a diameter of 5 mm and a height of 2 mm. Except for the negative control group, all samples were embedded into Allium cepa L., and the emitted H₂S was measured using the Wintact W8802 hydrogen sulfide monitor. Surface roughness's effect on emission was explored by roughening the surfaces of CAD-CAM material samples, and gas emission was measured again. The data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and DSCF pairwise comparison tests. Fiber-reinforced flowable composite (EverX Flow), amalgam (Nova 70-caps), and certain composite materials (IPS Empress Direct, Tetric Evoceram, Admira Fusion X-tra) released higher H₂S concentrations compared to the negative control. The H₂S release period lasted longer in the same materials mentioned above, along with G-aenial Universal Injectable. Indirectly used materials, such as GC Cerasmart, Vita Enamic, and Vita YZ HT, demonstrated significantly lower emissions compared to other direct restoratives. Importantly, the surface roughness of indirect materials did not significantly affect peak H₂S concentrations or release times. The study reveals variations in H₂S release among restorative materials, suggesting potential advantages of indirect restorative materials in reducing H₂S-induced halitosis. This comprehensive understanding of the relationship between restorative materials and halitosis can empower both dental professionals and patients to make well-informed treatment choices. Notably, there is evidence supporting the enhanced performance of indirect restorative materials for individuals affected by halitosis.

The analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled air has attracted the interest of the scientific community because it provides the possibility of monitoring physiological and metabolic processes and non-invasive diagnostics of various diseases. However, this method remains underused in clinical practice as well as in research because of the lack of standardized procedures for the collection, storage and transport of breath samples, which would guarantee good reproducibility and comparability of results. The method of sampling, as well as the storage time of the breath samples in the polymer bags used for sample storage and transport, affect the composition and concentration of VOCs present in the breath samples. The aim of our study was to compare breath samples obtained using two methods with fully disposable equipment: a Haldane sampling tube intended for direct breath collection and breath samples exhaled into a transparent Tedlar bag. The second task was to monitor the stability of selected compounds of real breath samples stored in a Tedlar bag for 6 h. Gas chromatography coupled with ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) implemented in the BreathSpec^®device was used to analyse exhaled breath. Our results showed a significant difference in the signal intensity of some volatiles when taking a breath sample with a Haldane tube and a Tedlar bag. Due to its endogenous origin, acetone levels were significantly higher when the Haldane tube sampler was used while elevated levels of 2-propanol and unidentified VOC (designated as VOC 3) in the Tedlar bag samples likely originated from contamination of the Tedlar bags. The VOC stability study revealed compound-specific signal intensity changes of the selected VOCs with storage time in the Tedlar bags, with some volatiles showing increasing signal intensity during storage in Tedlar bags. This limits the use of Tedlar bags only for very limited time and carefully selected purpose. Our results highlight the importance of careful design and implementation of experiments and clinical protocols to obtain relevant and reliable results.

Exhaled breath analysis has emerged as a non-invasive and promising method for early detection of lung cancer, offering a novel approach for diagnosis through the identification of specific biomarkers present in a patient's breath. For this longitudinal study, 29 treatment-naive patients with lung cancer were evaluated before and after surgery. Secondary electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry was used for exhaled breath analysis. Volatile organic compounds with absolute log²fold change ⩾1 andq-values ⩾ 0.71 were selected as potentially relevant. Exhaled breath analysis resulted in a total of 3482 features. 515 features showed a substantial difference before and after surgery. The small sample size generated a false positive rate of 0.71, therefore, around 154 of these 515 features were expected to be true changes. Biological identification of the features with the highest consistency (m/z-242.18428 andm/z-117.0539) revealed to potentially be 3-Oxotetradecanoic acid and Indole, respectively. Principal component analysis revealed a primary cluster of patients with a recurrent lung cancer, which remained undetected in the initial diagnostic and surgical procedures. The change of exhaled breath patterns after surgery in lung cancer emphasizes the potential for lung cancer screening and detection.

We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath was sampled at a single timepoint from five lactating dairy cows using six different SPE cartridges (Bond Elut ENV (ENV); Chromabond HRX (HRX); Chromabond HRP (HRP); Chromabond HLB (HLB); Chromabond HR-XCW (XCW) and Chromabond HR-XAW (XAW)). The trapped VOCs were analyzed by dynamic headspace vacuum in-tube extraction GC-MS (DHS-V-ITEX-GC-MS). Depending on the SPE cartridge, we detected 1174-1312 VOCs per cartridge. Most VOCs were alkenes, alkanes, esters, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, nitriles, ethers, amides, carboxylic acids, alkynes, azoles, terpenes, pyridines, or sulfur-containing compounds. The six SPE cartridges differed in their specificity for the chemical compounds, with the XAW cartridge showing the best specificity for ketones. The greatest differences between the tested SPE cartridges appeared in the detection of specific VOCs. In total, 176 different VOCs were detected with a match factor >80%. The greatest number of specific VOCs was captured by XAW (149), followed by ENV (118), HLB (117), HRP (115), HRX (114), and XCW (114). We conclude that the tested SPE cartridges are suitable for VOC sampling from exhaled cow breath, but the SPE cartridge choice enormously affects the detected chemical groups and the number of detected VOCs. Therefore, an appropriate SPE adsorbent cartridge should be selected according to our proposed inclusion criteria. For targeted metabolomics approaches, the SPE cartridge choice depends on the VOCs or chemical compound groups of interest based on our provided VOC list. For untargeted approaches without information on the animals' metabolic condition, we suggest using multi-sorbent SPE cartridges or multiple cartridges per animal.

Clostridioides difficileinfection (CDI) is the leading cause of hospital-acquired infective diarrhea. Current methods for diagnosing CDI have limitations; enzyme immunoassays for toxin have low sensitivity andClostridioides difficilepolymerase chain reaction cannot differentiate infection from colonization. An ideal diagnostic test that incorporates microbial factors, host factors, and host-microbe interaction might characterize true infection. Assessing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath may be a useful test for identifying CDI. To identify a wide selection of VOCs in exhaled breath, we used thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to study breath samples from 17 patients with CDI. Age- and sex-matched patients with diarrhea and negativeC.difficiletesting (no CDI) were used as controls. Of the 65 VOCs tested, 9 were used to build a quadratic discriminant model that showed a final cross-validated accuracy of 74%, a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 76%, and a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.72. If these findings are proven by larger studies, breath VOC analysis may be a helpful adjunctive diagnostic test for CDI.

Volatilomics is a powerful tool capable of providing novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. The main objective of this study was to characterize the volatilomic signatures of gastric juice in order to identify potential alterations induced by gastric cancer. Gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection, coupled with headspace solid phase microextraction as the pre-concentration technique, was used to identify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by gastric juice samples collected from 78 gastric cancer patients and two cohorts of controls (80 and 96 subjects) from four different locations (Latvia, Ukraine, Brazil, and Colombia). 1440 distinct compounds were identified in samples obtained from patients and 1422 in samples provided by controls. However, only 6% of the VOCs exhibited an incidence higher than 20%. Amongst the volatiles emitted, 18 showed differences in their headspace concentrations above gastric juice of cancer patients and controls. Ten of these (1-propanol, 2,3-butanedione, 2-pentanone, benzeneacetaldehyde, 3-methylbutanal, butylated hydroxytoluene, 2-pentyl-furan, 2-ethylhexanal, 2-methylpropanal and phenol) appeared at significantly higher levels in the headspace of the gastric juice samples obtained from patients; whereas, eight species showed lower abundance in patients than found in controls. Given that the difference in the volatilomic signatures can be explained by cancer-related changes in the activity of certain enzymes or pathways, the former set can be considered potential biomarkers for gastric cancer, which may assist in developing non-invasive breath tests for the diagnosis of this disease. Further studies are required to elucidate further the mechanisms that underlie the changes in the volatilomic profile as a result of gastric cancer.