Lauren Eskreis-Winkler, Kaitlin Woolley, Minhee Kim, Eliana Polimeni
People are systematically unaware of the mishaps, problems, and failures around them, a phenomenon we dub the failure gap. People underestimate tens of thousands, and in some cases, millions of failures at the individual, national, and international level across 30+ life domains (Study 1). For every three species that go extinct, the public knows of one; for every five weapons undetected by airport security, people think one sneaks by. Why are people unaware of the problems around them? Failure is underreported relative to success (Studies 2-5). The failure gap had policy implications for key decision makers. Closing the failure gap reduced support for harsh punishment (e.g., school suspensions) among educators, lowered support for mass incarceration among voters, led managers to extend paid parental leave to new mothers, and shrank social stigma in the workplace (Studies 6 and 7). Taken together, the failure gap is common, crippling, and encouragingly correctable. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
人们对周围的不幸、问题和失败毫无察觉,我们将这种现象称为“失败间隙”。人们低估了数以万计,在某些情况下,在个人、国家和国际层面上跨越30多个生活领域的数百万次失败(研究1)。对于每三个灭绝的物种,公众只知道一个;人们认为,每五件未被机场安检发现的武器中,就有一件是偷偷溜出来的。为什么人们没有意识到他们周围的问题?相对于成功,失败被低估了(研究2-5)。失败差距对关键决策者具有政策影响。缩小失败差距减少了教育工作者对严厉惩罚(如停学)的支持,降低了选民对大规模监禁的支持,导致管理者延长带薪育儿假给新妈妈,并减少了工作场所的社会耻辱感(研究6和7)。总而言之,失败差距是普遍的,严重的,并且是可以纠正的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The failure gap.","authors":"Lauren Eskreis-Winkler, Kaitlin Woolley, Minhee Kim, Eliana Polimeni","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000468","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspa0000468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People are systematically unaware of the mishaps, problems, and failures around them, a phenomenon we dub the <i>failure gap</i>. People underestimate tens of thousands, and in some cases, millions of failures at the individual, national, and international level across 30+ life domains (Study 1). For every three species that go extinct, the public knows of one; for every five weapons undetected by airport security, people think one sneaks by. Why are people unaware of the problems around them? Failure is underreported relative to success (Studies 2-5). The failure gap had policy implications for key decision makers. Closing the failure gap reduced support for harsh punishment (e.g., school suspensions) among educators, lowered support for mass incarceration among voters, led managers to extend paid parental leave to new mothers, and shrank social stigma in the workplace (Studies 6 and 7). Taken together, the failure gap is common, crippling, and encouragingly correctable. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145377782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000502.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for A Prospective Longitudinal Study of the Associations Between Childhood and Adolescent Interpersonal Experiences and Adult Attachment Orientations","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000502.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000502.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145382360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000468.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for The Failure Gap","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000468.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000468.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145382361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The dispositional basis of selective prosociality.","authors":"Büsra Elif Yelbuz, Isabel Thielmann","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000583","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000583","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145295800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Peter Haehner, Luzelle Naudé, Christopher J. Hopwood, Catherine M. Shirima, Sumaya Laher, Elizabeth N. Shino, Stephen Asatsa, Maria Florence, Tracey-Ann Adonis, Wiebke Bleidorn, Amber G. Thalmayer
{"title":"Personality trait change in three sub-Saharan countries: Normative development and life events.","authors":"Peter Haehner, Luzelle Naudé, Christopher J. Hopwood, Catherine M. Shirima, Sumaya Laher, Elizabeth N. Shino, Stephen Asatsa, Maria Florence, Tracey-Ann Adonis, Wiebke Bleidorn, Amber G. Thalmayer","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000582","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000582","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145295138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000582.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Personality Trait Change in Three Sub-Saharan Countries: Normative Development and Life Events","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000582.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000582.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145255194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-25DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000467
Amie M Gordon, Maria Luciani, Annika From
Amid heightened political polarization in the United States, have politics worked their way into the bedroom? An increase in political similarity between romantic partners has consequences not just for romantic relationships but for society as a whole; political homophily increases our political echo chambers and affects future generations. We drew upon 11 data sets with over 4,000 individuals (including more than 500 couples) to test four preregistered research questions about the prevalence, correlates, consequences, and potential buffers of political dissimilarity in modern-day relationships. Across measures of similarity (overall perceptions, partisanship matching, shared political ideology), couples in our sample showed high levels of political similarity (e.g., 23% were cross-partisan, with fewer than 8% composed of one Democrat and one Republican). Examining 18 potential correlates of political dissimilarity, we found little evidence that certain factors predispose people to end up in a politically dissimilar relationship. When considering the potential consequences of political dissimilarity, we found a small association between political dissimilarity and relationship quality in general and in daily life. The effect was evident when examining perceived political dissimilarity (over and above perceptions of overall similarity) and, to a lesser extent, dissimilarity in terms of partisanship and political ideology. Prosocial processes such as appreciation and perspective-taking may moderate these effects. Taken together, these findings speak to the need to further consider the ways in which the sociopolitical context is shaping the formation and maintenance of close relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"I love you but I hate your politics: The role of political dissimilarity in romantic relationships.","authors":"Amie M Gordon, Maria Luciani, Annika From","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000467","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspi0000467","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amid heightened political polarization in the United States, have politics worked their way into the bedroom? An increase in political similarity between romantic partners has consequences not just for romantic relationships but for society as a whole; political homophily increases our political echo chambers and affects future generations. We drew upon 11 data sets with over 4,000 individuals (including more than 500 couples) to test four preregistered research questions about the prevalence, correlates, consequences, and potential buffers of political dissimilarity in modern-day relationships. Across measures of similarity (overall perceptions, partisanship matching, shared political ideology), couples in our sample showed high levels of political similarity (e.g., 23% were cross-partisan, with fewer than 8% composed of one Democrat and one Republican). Examining 18 potential correlates of political dissimilarity, we found little evidence that certain factors predispose people to end up in a politically dissimilar relationship. When considering the potential consequences of political dissimilarity, we found a small association between political dissimilarity and relationship quality in general and in daily life. The effect was evident when examining perceived political dissimilarity (over and above perceptions of overall similarity) and, to a lesser extent, dissimilarity in terms of partisanship and political ideology. Prosocial processes such as appreciation and perspective-taking may moderate these effects. Taken together, these findings speak to the need to further consider the ways in which the sociopolitical context is shaping the formation and maintenance of close relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"692-713"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141759318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Reports the notice of retraction of "Here one time, gone the next: Fluctuations in support received and provided predict changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood" by Jami Eller, Yuthika U. Girme, Brian P. Don, W. Steven Rholes, Kristin D. Mickelson and Jeffry A. Simpson (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2023[May], Vol 124[5], 971-1000; see record 2023-15847-001). The first author, Jami Eller, was unable to be reached. In the process of replicating analyses, these authors found that while the descriptive statistics for both studies reported in this paper replicated, overtime dyadic analyses testing focal hypotheses were not statistically significant at p < .05. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-15847-001.) Extant research has demonstrated that higher mean (average) levels of social support often produce robust relational benefits. However, partners may not maintain the same level of support across time, resulting in potential fluctuations (i.e., within-person variations across time) in support. Despite the theorizing and initial research on fluctuations in relationship-relevant thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, little is known about (a) who is most likely to fluctuate in support and (b) the degree to which fluctuations, in combination with and beyond mean levels, impact relationships across time. The current preregistered research examined two dyadic longitudinal samples of first-time parents undergoing the transition to parenthood, a chronically stressful time that often entails the provision and receipt of support involving one's partner. Across both studies, we found that individuals who reported greater mental health problems, more situational stress, and more destructive dispositional attributes tended to report lower mean levels and higher fluctuations in provided and received support at subsequent assessments. Moreover, we found that greater fluctuations in perceptions and observations of support predicted decreases in relationship satisfaction over time, above and beyond the effect of mean levels. Implications for theory and studying nonlinear effects in relationships are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
报道Jami Eller, Yuthika U. Girme, Brian P. Don, W. Steven Rholes, Kristin D. Mickelson和Jeffry A. Simpson的“一次在这里,下一次就走了:在过渡到为人父母的过程中,获得和提供的支持的波动预测关系满意度的变化”的撤回通知(人格与社会心理学杂志,2023[5],Vol 124 bbb, 971-1000;见记录2023-15847-001)。记者无法联系到第一作者杰米·埃勒(Jami Eller)。在重复分析的过程中,这些作者发现,虽然本文报道的两项研究的描述性统计都是重复的,但检验焦点假设的二元分析在p < 0.05时没有统计学意义。(原文摘要见记录2023-15847-001)现有的研究表明,较高的平均(平均)社会支持水平通常会产生强大的关系效益。然而,合作伙伴可能不会在一段时间内保持相同的支持水平,从而导致支持的潜在波动(即人与人之间的差异)。尽管对与关系相关的思想、感觉和行为的波动进行了理论化和初步研究,但对于(a)谁最有可能在支持方面波动,以及(b)波动在多大程度上与平均水平相结合或超出平均水平,随着时间的推移影响关系,我们知之甚少。目前的预登记研究检查了两个双纵向样本的第一次父母正在过渡到为人父母,一个长期的压力时期,往往需要提供和接受支持涉及一个人的伴侣。在这两项研究中,我们发现,报告心理健康问题更严重、情境压力更大、破坏性性格特征更强的个体,在随后的评估中,报告的平均水平更低,提供和接受的支持波动更大。此外,我们发现,随着时间的推移,对支持的感知和观察的较大波动预示着关系满意度的下降,超出了平均水平的影响。讨论了关系中非线性效应的理论和研究意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Retraction of \"Here one time, gone the next: Fluctuations in support received and provided predict changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood,\" by Eller et al. (2022).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000505","url":null,"abstract":"Reports the notice of retraction of \"Here one time, gone the next: Fluctuations in support received and provided predict changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood\" by Jami Eller, Yuthika U. Girme, Brian P. Don, W. Steven Rholes, Kristin D. Mickelson and Jeffry A. Simpson (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2023[May], Vol 124[5], 971-1000; see record 2023-15847-001). The first author, Jami Eller, was unable to be reached. In the process of replicating analyses, these authors found that while the descriptive statistics for both studies reported in this paper replicated, overtime dyadic analyses testing focal hypotheses were not statistically significant at p < .05. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-15847-001.) Extant research has demonstrated that higher mean (average) levels of social support often produce robust relational benefits. However, partners may not maintain the same level of support across time, resulting in potential fluctuations (i.e., within-person variations across time) in support. Despite the theorizing and initial research on fluctuations in relationship-relevant thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, little is known about (a) who is most likely to fluctuate in support and (b) the degree to which fluctuations, in combination with and beyond mean levels, impact relationships across time. The current preregistered research examined two dyadic longitudinal samples of first-time parents undergoing the transition to parenthood, a chronically stressful time that often entails the provision and receipt of support involving one's partner. Across both studies, we found that individuals who reported greater mental health problems, more situational stress, and more destructive dispositional attributes tended to report lower mean levels and higher fluctuations in provided and received support at subsequent assessments. Moreover, we found that greater fluctuations in perceptions and observations of support predicted decreases in relationship satisfaction over time, above and beyond the effect of mean levels. Implications for theory and studying nonlinear effects in relationships are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"44 1","pages":"758"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145032139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000554
Allon Vishkin, Dov Cohen, Shinobu Kitayama
Protestantism, as opposed to Catholicism, is widely seen as having contributed to the rise of Western individualism. However, little is known about potential value differences between these two branches of Christianity in contemporary Europe. In the current work, we examined patterns of value endorsement among current and former Protestants and Catholics within and between 20 European countries using data from the European Social Survey (N = 163,586). Results reveal that within a given country, Protestants are more likely to endorse self-transcendence values than Catholics are, and these findings held when controlling for religiosity, differences in socioeconomic status, and differences in religious de-identification. Surprisingly, differences between Protestants and Catholics in value endorsement were sometimes larger among less (vs. more) religious respondents and were detectable even among former Protestants and Catholics, with former Protestants resembling religious respondents more than former Catholics did. Results also reveal that some Protestant-Catholic differences are consistent across cultures, whereas others-principally on the dimension of openness to change versus conservation-are moderated by which group is the majority heritage. We discuss the possible contribution of Protestantism to Western individualism's universalistic orientation, considering the association between Protestantism and self-transcendence values. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
与天主教相反的新教被广泛认为对西方个人主义的兴起做出了贡献。然而,在当代欧洲,人们对这两个基督教分支之间潜在的价值差异知之甚少。在目前的工作中,我们使用来自欧洲社会调查(N = 163,586)的数据,研究了20个欧洲国家内部和之间现有和以前的新教徒和天主教徒的价值认可模式。结果显示,在一个特定的国家,新教徒比天主教徒更有可能支持自我超越的价值观,当控制宗教信仰、社会经济地位的差异和宗教去认同的差异时,这些发现成立。令人惊讶的是,新教徒和天主教徒在价值认同上的差异有时在宗教信仰较少(相对较多)的受访者中更大,甚至在前新教徒和天主教徒中也可以察觉到,前新教徒比前天主教徒更像宗教受访者。结果还显示,一些新教和天主教的差异在不同文化中是一致的,而另一些差异——主要是在开放变革与保守的维度上——则被哪个群体是主要的遗产所缓和。考虑到新教与自我超越价值观之间的联系,我们讨论了新教对西方个人主义普遍主义取向的可能贡献。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Value endorsement among Protestants and Catholics within and between countries in Europe: Implications for individualism.","authors":"Allon Vishkin, Dov Cohen, Shinobu Kitayama","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000554","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspp0000554","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protestantism, as opposed to Catholicism, is widely seen as having contributed to the rise of Western individualism. However, little is known about potential value differences between these two branches of Christianity in contemporary Europe. In the current work, we examined patterns of value endorsement among current and former Protestants and Catholics within and between 20 European countries using data from the European Social Survey (<i>N</i> = 163,586). Results reveal that within a given country, Protestants are more likely to endorse self-transcendence values than Catholics are, and these findings held when controlling for religiosity, differences in socioeconomic status, and differences in religious de-identification. Surprisingly, differences between Protestants and Catholics in value endorsement were sometimes larger among less (vs. more) religious respondents and were detectable even among former Protestants and Catholics, with former Protestants resembling religious respondents more than former Catholics did. Results also reveal that some Protestant-Catholic differences are consistent across cultures, whereas others-principally on the dimension of openness to change versus conservation-are moderated by which group is the majority heritage. We discuss the possible contribution of Protestantism to Western individualism's universalistic orientation, considering the association between Protestantism and self-transcendence values. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"759-771"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vincenzo J Olivett, Madeleine Stults, David S March
In the United States, encounters among police officers and civilians are laden with the potential for dangerous outcomes. At the same time, the ubiquity of digital and social media has made observing violent police-civilian encounters easier than ever. Perhaps consequently, recent evidence suggests that Americans automatically associate the police with and behaviorally respond to officers as a source of physical threat. However, little is known about the interplay between observations of violent police encounters and automatic police-threat associations. Four studies (N = 857) reveal a mutually reinforcing dynamic in which (a) automatic police-threat associations shape perceptions of aggression during arrests, (b) perceptions of aggression during arrests influence automatic police-threat associations, and (c) changes in automatic police-threat associations influence downstream perceptions of aggression. That is, people perceive aggression during arrest encounters through the lens of their existing police-threat associations, and these perceptions in turn reinforce those associations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
在美国,警察和平民之间的冲突充满了危险后果的可能性。与此同时,无处不在的数字和社交媒体使得观察警察与平民的暴力冲突比以往任何时候都容易。也许正因为如此,最近的证据表明,美国人会自然而然地将警察与身体威胁的来源联系在一起,并在行为上对警察做出反应。然而,人们对暴力警察遭遇和自动警察威胁之间的相互作用知之甚少。四项研究(N = 857)揭示了一种相互加强的动态,其中(a)自动警察-威胁关联塑造逮捕期间的攻击感知,(b)逮捕期间的攻击感知影响自动警察-威胁关联,以及(c)自动警察-威胁关联的变化影响下游的攻击感知。也就是说,在逮捕过程中,人们通过他们现有的警察威胁联想来感知攻击,而这些感知反过来又强化了这些联想。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Downward spiral: Police-threat associations and perceptions of aggression during arrests are mutually reinforcing.","authors":"Vincenzo J Olivett, Madeleine Stults, David S March","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000461","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspa0000461","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, encounters among police officers and civilians are laden with the potential for dangerous outcomes. At the same time, the ubiquity of digital and social media has made observing violent police-civilian encounters easier than ever. Perhaps consequently, recent evidence suggests that Americans automatically associate the police with and behaviorally respond to officers as a source of physical threat. However, little is known about the interplay between observations of violent police encounters and automatic police-threat associations. Four studies (<i>N</i> = 857) reveal a mutually reinforcing dynamic in which (a) automatic police-threat associations shape perceptions of aggression during arrests, (b) perceptions of aggression during arrests influence automatic police-threat associations, and (c) changes in automatic police-threat associations influence downstream perceptions of aggression. That is, people perceive aggression during arrest encounters through the lens of their existing police-threat associations, and these perceptions in turn reinforce those associations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145192023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}