Toby D. Jackson, Fabian J. Fischer, Grégoire Vincent, Eric B. Gorgens, Michael Keller, Jérôme Chave, Tommaso Jucker, David A. Coomes
The future of tropical forests hinges on the balance between disturbance rates, which are expected to increase with climate change, and tree growth. Whereas tree growth is a slow process, disturbance events occur sporadically and tend to be short-lived. This difference challenges forest monitoring to achieve sufficient resolution to capture tree growth, while covering the necessary scale to characterize disturbance rates. Airborne LiDAR time series can address this challenge by measuring landscape scale changes in canopy height at 1 m resolution. In this study, we present a robust framework for analysing disturbance and recovery processes in LiDAR time series data. We apply this framework to 8000 ha of old-growth tropical forests over a 4–5-year time frame, comparing growth and disturbance rates between Borneo, the eastern Amazon and the Guiana shield. Our findings reveal that disturbance was balanced by growth in eastern Amazonia and the Guiana shield, resulting in a relatively stable mean canopy height. In contrast, tall Bornean forests experienced a decrease in canopy height due to numerous small-scale (<0.1 ha) disturbance events outweighing the gains due to growth. Within sites, we found that disturbance rates were weakly related to topography, but significantly increased with maximum canopy height. This could be because taller trees were particularly vulnerable to disturbance agents such as drought, wind and lightning. Consequently, we anticipate that tall forests, which contain substantial carbon stocks, will be disproportionately affected by the increasing severity of extreme weather events driven by climate change.
{"title":"Tall Bornean forests experience higher canopy disturbance rates than those in the eastern Amazon or Guiana shield","authors":"Toby D. Jackson, Fabian J. Fischer, Grégoire Vincent, Eric B. Gorgens, Michael Keller, Jérôme Chave, Tommaso Jucker, David A. Coomes","doi":"10.1111/gcb.17493","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gcb.17493","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The future of tropical forests hinges on the balance between disturbance rates, which are expected to increase with climate change, and tree growth. Whereas tree growth is a slow process, disturbance events occur sporadically and tend to be short-lived. This difference challenges forest monitoring to achieve sufficient resolution to capture tree growth, while covering the necessary scale to characterize disturbance rates. Airborne LiDAR time series can address this challenge by measuring landscape scale changes in canopy height at 1 m resolution. In this study, we present a robust framework for analysing disturbance and recovery processes in LiDAR time series data. We apply this framework to 8000 ha of old-growth tropical forests over a 4–5-year time frame, comparing growth and disturbance rates between Borneo, the eastern Amazon and the Guiana shield. Our findings reveal that disturbance was balanced by growth in eastern Amazonia and the Guiana shield, resulting in a relatively stable mean canopy height. In contrast, tall Bornean forests experienced a decrease in canopy height due to numerous small-scale (<0.1 ha) disturbance events outweighing the gains due to growth. Within sites, we found that disturbance rates were weakly related to topography, but significantly increased with maximum canopy height. This could be because taller trees were particularly vulnerable to disturbance agents such as drought, wind and lightning. Consequently, we anticipate that tall forests, which contain substantial carbon stocks, will be disproportionately affected by the increasing severity of extreme weather events driven by climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.17493","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142138783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gerald C. Nelson, William W. L. Cheung, Rachel Bezner Kerr, James Franke, Francisco Meza, Muhammed A. Oyinlola, Philip Thornton, Florian Zabel
<p>This special issue of Global Change Biology grew out of a recognition by the Sixth Assessment of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group 2 (IPCC AR6 WG2) authors of chapter 5 (“Food, fibre, and other ecosystem products”) (Bezner-Kerr et al., 2022) that literature on limits to climate change adaptation in food production was lacking. The IPCC defines limits to adaptation as: “The point at which an actor's objectives (or system needs) cannot be secured from intolerable risks through adaptive actions.” (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022). “Hard” limits to adaptation are when no adaptive actions are possible to avoid intolerable risks. “Soft” limits are when options are currently not available to avert intolerable risks through adaptive action. Few peer-reviewed papers were available that dealt with either soft or hard limits to adaptation in food systems. Furthermore, the literature available for AR6 was almost always based on earlier Earth System Model simulations (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5—CMIP5—and earlier versions) rather than the latest version (CMIP6) that became available during the writing of the IPCC AR6 WG2 report. Comparisons of the CMIP products suggest that projections from Earth system models in CMIP6 are more sensitive to greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations than earlier model results. Thus, the impacts of climate change on food production systems from CMIP6 are likely to occur earlier and at a higher rate and intensity than previously expected, with potentially large implications for adaptations and their limits.</p><p>These papers are driven for the most part by scenarios and Earth system model projections from CMIP6 for the 21st century, focusing on the Shared Socio-economic Pathway (SSP) 1–2.6 (a scenario with “strong mitigation”) and SSP5-8.5 (a scenario with “no mitigation”). Collectively, these papers help paint a picture of the potential futures of a range of food production systems in the world under contrasting climate scenarios.</p><p>Different combinations of climate variables are used in each paper to illustrate different mechanisms of potential impact and challenges posed by climate change, as well as potential adaptation options and their limits. The primary climatic drivers affecting food systems differ by location. On land, these drivers include temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind speed, solar radiation and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration while in the oceans, they encompass warming, deoxygenation, acidification, salinity, and changes in net primary production.</p><p>Table 1 summarizes systems analyzed and the key results in this special issue. It is followed by a more extensive discussion of each paper and a summary section on what has been learned.</p><p>The papers in this special issue cover a range of food production systems, and they discuss how challenging it will be to adapt to climate change, particularly if the most severe climate scenario examined (SSP5-
{"title":"Adaptation to climate change and limits in food production systems: Physics, the chemistry of biology, and human behavior","authors":"Gerald C. Nelson, William W. L. Cheung, Rachel Bezner Kerr, James Franke, Francisco Meza, Muhammed A. Oyinlola, Philip Thornton, Florian Zabel","doi":"10.1111/gcb.17489","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gcb.17489","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This special issue of Global Change Biology grew out of a recognition by the Sixth Assessment of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group 2 (IPCC AR6 WG2) authors of chapter 5 (“Food, fibre, and other ecosystem products”) (Bezner-Kerr et al., 2022) that literature on limits to climate change adaptation in food production was lacking. The IPCC defines limits to adaptation as: “The point at which an actor's objectives (or system needs) cannot be secured from intolerable risks through adaptive actions.” (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022). “Hard” limits to adaptation are when no adaptive actions are possible to avoid intolerable risks. “Soft” limits are when options are currently not available to avert intolerable risks through adaptive action. Few peer-reviewed papers were available that dealt with either soft or hard limits to adaptation in food systems. Furthermore, the literature available for AR6 was almost always based on earlier Earth System Model simulations (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5—CMIP5—and earlier versions) rather than the latest version (CMIP6) that became available during the writing of the IPCC AR6 WG2 report. Comparisons of the CMIP products suggest that projections from Earth system models in CMIP6 are more sensitive to greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations than earlier model results. Thus, the impacts of climate change on food production systems from CMIP6 are likely to occur earlier and at a higher rate and intensity than previously expected, with potentially large implications for adaptations and their limits.</p><p>These papers are driven for the most part by scenarios and Earth system model projections from CMIP6 for the 21st century, focusing on the Shared Socio-economic Pathway (SSP) 1–2.6 (a scenario with “strong mitigation”) and SSP5-8.5 (a scenario with “no mitigation”). Collectively, these papers help paint a picture of the potential futures of a range of food production systems in the world under contrasting climate scenarios.</p><p>Different combinations of climate variables are used in each paper to illustrate different mechanisms of potential impact and challenges posed by climate change, as well as potential adaptation options and their limits. The primary climatic drivers affecting food systems differ by location. On land, these drivers include temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind speed, solar radiation and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration while in the oceans, they encompass warming, deoxygenation, acidification, salinity, and changes in net primary production.</p><p>Table 1 summarizes systems analyzed and the key results in this special issue. It is followed by a more extensive discussion of each paper and a summary section on what has been learned.</p><p>The papers in this special issue cover a range of food production systems, and they discuss how challenging it will be to adapt to climate change, particularly if the most severe climate scenario examined (SSP5-","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.17489","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142138780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article is an Invited Commentary on Stephenson et al. (2024). This commentary attempts to provide broader context of the research within the body of literature on species loss and ecosystem functioning and highlights its relevance to conservation and global change.