Pub Date : 2025-10-30DOI: 10.1177/14614448251356453
Tom Divon, Tobias Ebbrecht-Hartmann
TikTok has become a space where playfulness is the dominant lingo for engaging with serious subjects. On the platform, the Holocaust is mediated through meme-based performances like the #POVHolocaustChallenge, a trend that invited users to re-enact fictionalized memories of Holocaust victims. Our analysis of 250 videos identifies 3 types of Holocaust-related memetic narratives—mem(e)ories: (1) Testimonial Mem(e)ory, where “victims” testify from “heaven” as confessional storytelling; (2) Punitive Mem(e)ory, where “victims” choose to be sent back to the Holocaust as punishment; and (3) Escapist Mem(e)ory, where “victims” time travel from the 1940s to the present for a brief escape. Drawing on interviews with 15 creators and 7 Holocaust institution representatives, we argue that #POV challenges re-mediate past events, transform into education, and serve as a means for forging personal connections to the Holocaust. We introduce TikTok’s affordance of playability as a structural condition that governs participation, with users merging performative storytelling with remix culture and inscribing Holocaust (post)memory into their platformed experiences.
{"title":"“On TikTok, everything needs to be playful, even the Holocaust!”: Playability, memes, and participatory memory culture","authors":"Tom Divon, Tobias Ebbrecht-Hartmann","doi":"10.1177/14614448251356453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251356453","url":null,"abstract":"TikTok has become a space where playfulness is the dominant lingo for engaging with serious subjects. On the platform, the Holocaust is mediated through meme-based performances like the #POVHolocaustChallenge, a trend that invited users to re-enact fictionalized memories of Holocaust victims. Our analysis of 250 videos identifies 3 types of Holocaust-related memetic narratives—mem(e)ories: (1) Testimonial Mem(e)ory, where “victims” testify from “heaven” as confessional storytelling; (2) Punitive Mem(e)ory, where “victims” choose to be sent back to the Holocaust as punishment; and (3) Escapist Mem(e)ory, where “victims” time travel from the 1940s to the present for a brief escape. Drawing on interviews with 15 creators and 7 Holocaust institution representatives, we argue that #POV challenges re-mediate past events, transform into education, and serve as a means for forging personal connections to the Holocaust. We introduce TikTok’s affordance of playability as a structural condition that governs participation, with users merging performative storytelling with remix culture and inscribing Holocaust (post)memory into their platformed experiences.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145397411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-29DOI: 10.1177/14614448251385087
Riitta Hänninen, Sakari Taipale
This critical conceptual analysis explores the key challenges associated with warm experts, such as family members and friends, in providing informal digital support in later life. We examine the challenges that stem from the dyadic relationship between warm experts and older adults, as well as the individual, social and societal characteristics of being a warm expert with limited resources to provide digital support to older adults. In conclusion, while the contribution of warm experts to digital support in later life is evident, they may lack the necessary resources to meet the heterogeneous needs of older adults from an individual standpoint. From a social perspective, the primary limitation of warm experts as providers of informal support lies in the unequal distribution of the informal digital support they offer. In societal terms, we argue that warm experts should not be seen as the sole solution to the challenges posed by digital inclusion and digital inequalities related to ageing.
{"title":"Warm experts among us: Conceptualising the challenges of informal digital support for older adults","authors":"Riitta Hänninen, Sakari Taipale","doi":"10.1177/14614448251385087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251385087","url":null,"abstract":"This critical conceptual analysis explores the key challenges associated with warm experts, such as family members and friends, in providing informal digital support in later life. We examine the challenges that stem from the dyadic relationship between warm experts and older adults, as well as the individual, social and societal characteristics of being a warm expert with limited resources to provide digital support to older adults. In conclusion, while the contribution of warm experts to digital support in later life is evident, they may lack the necessary resources to meet the heterogeneous needs of older adults from an individual standpoint. From a social perspective, the primary limitation of warm experts as providers of informal support lies in the unequal distribution of the informal digital support they offer. In societal terms, we argue that warm experts should not be seen as the sole solution to the challenges posed by digital inclusion and digital inequalities related to ageing.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145397416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-29DOI: 10.1177/14614448251385086
Julia Salles
This article examines the relationship between prediction and serendipity in the short-video social media platform TikTok, analyzing its recommendation algorithm through the lenses of affective and pragmatic turns in cognitive science. By looking at TikTok’s user experience, I demonstrate that while predictive models are crucial for user engagement, elements of surprise and unpredictability are equally essential for maintaining user interest. The study draws on theories of perception, emotion processing, and affect to provide a comprehensive understanding of the cognitive and embodied dimensions of digital social media experiences. I argue that TikTok’s success lies in its unique integration of both predictive accuracy and serendipitous discovery, creating an “indeterminacy center” that keeps users engaged. This research contributes to the broader understanding of social media dynamics, offering insights into the balance between prediction and serendipity in digital platforms.
{"title":"Affect and prediction in short-video social media recommendation algorithm: TikTok and the missing half-second","authors":"Julia Salles","doi":"10.1177/14614448251385086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251385086","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the relationship between prediction and serendipity in the short-video social media platform TikTok, analyzing its recommendation algorithm through the lenses of affective and pragmatic turns in cognitive science. By looking at TikTok’s user experience, I demonstrate that while predictive models are crucial for user engagement, elements of surprise and unpredictability are equally essential for maintaining user interest. The study draws on theories of perception, emotion processing, and affect to provide a comprehensive understanding of the cognitive and embodied dimensions of digital social media experiences. I argue that TikTok’s success lies in its unique integration of both predictive accuracy and serendipitous discovery, creating an “indeterminacy center” that keeps users engaged. This research contributes to the broader understanding of social media dynamics, offering insights into the balance between prediction and serendipity in digital platforms.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145397414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-29DOI: 10.1177/14614448251384258
Simone Natale, Bruno Surace, Enrico Mensa, Luca Befera
Cultural heritage institutions have recently experimented with the customization of generative AI and specifically large language models (LLMs) to create chatbots that impersonate historical characters. While this application has the potential to enhance user engagement, challenges remain, especially considering the need to ensure authenticity and historical accuracy and LLMs’ tendency to hallucinate. Through the analysis of the case study of a chatbot developed to impersonate the historical figure of Luigi Einaudi, the first elected president of the Italian Republic, the article interrogates opportunities, problems and risks raised by the customization of generative AI, in a moment when decisions about applying or not applying LLMs are being considered by many cultural heritage institutions around the world. The article, moreover, introduces a variant of the walkthrough method aimed to study AI conversational agents, called ‘talkthrough’, which represents an important addition to the methodological toolbox that can be activated to study generative AI.
{"title":"ChatGPT for cultural heritage and the customization of generative AI: A talkthrough analysis of the Luigi Einaudi chatbot","authors":"Simone Natale, Bruno Surace, Enrico Mensa, Luca Befera","doi":"10.1177/14614448251384258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251384258","url":null,"abstract":"Cultural heritage institutions have recently experimented with the customization of generative AI and specifically large language models (LLMs) to create chatbots that impersonate historical characters. While this application has the potential to enhance user engagement, challenges remain, especially considering the need to ensure authenticity and historical accuracy and LLMs’ tendency to hallucinate. Through the analysis of the case study of a chatbot developed to impersonate the historical figure of Luigi Einaudi, the first elected president of the Italian Republic, the article interrogates opportunities, problems and risks raised by the customization of generative AI, in a moment when decisions about applying or not applying LLMs are being considered by many cultural heritage institutions around the world. The article, moreover, introduces a variant of the walkthrough method aimed to study AI conversational agents, called ‘talkthrough’, which represents an important addition to the methodological toolbox that can be activated to study generative AI.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"230 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145397415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1177/14614448251393100
{"title":"Erratum to ‘Google Maps review sub-platform: A narrative view of design, affordances, and user activity’","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/14614448251393100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251393100","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145397418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1177/14614448251379031
Aleksi Soini, Ana Paula Lafaire
In this article, we explore how Instagram constitutes a site for affective disorientation and thus facilitates and conditions various processes of identity work. This study examines this process by shedding light on our own experiences of our relationship with Instagram and illustrates how Instagram fosters opportunities and (im)possibilities for affective identity work. We present this autoethnographical account of Instagram through writing differently by using collaborative poetic collage. Our explorative study aims to create the following two contributions: first, we extend the scholarly discussion on identity work online by shedding light on the affective side of identity work processes, conditioned by the uncontrollable and disorienting intensities and moments of social media. Second, we use poetics to expand on politics of feminist knowledge production and to write differently, while engaging with our personal and political experiences.
{"title":"Keep scrolling by/for yourself: Affective identity work in social media","authors":"Aleksi Soini, Ana Paula Lafaire","doi":"10.1177/14614448251379031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251379031","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we explore how Instagram constitutes a site for affective disorientation and thus facilitates and conditions various processes of identity work. This study examines this process by shedding light on our own experiences of our relationship with Instagram and illustrates how Instagram fosters opportunities and (im)possibilities for affective identity work. We present this autoethnographical account of Instagram through writing differently by using collaborative poetic collage. Our explorative study aims to create the following two contributions: first, we extend the scholarly discussion on identity work online by shedding light on the affective side of identity work processes, conditioned by the uncontrollable and disorienting intensities and moments of social media. Second, we use poetics to expand on politics of feminist knowledge production and to write differently, while engaging with our personal and political experiences.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145397906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1177/14614448251381725
Sarit Navon
This article introduces the concept of temporal logic to theorize how users engage with time as part of their media practices. Analyzing 40 cases of mourning and memorialization practices across Facebook’s Profiles, Groups, and Pages, the study identifies three core components: a twofold engagement with time (calendric and discursive), temporal introspection, and temporal convergence. The calendric use of time involves specific dates that serve as temporal triggers for posting, while the discursive use describes how users embed time into their posts—through rich and repeated time expressions, poetic narration, and so on. Time becomes a communicative resource, not merely a contextual background but an active rhetorical and affective tool. Temporal introspection captures how social media platforms invite users to articulate their inner experience of time, and temporal convergence reveals how multiple temporal layers—personal and collective, offline and online—converge on a single platform, giving rise to new rituals and expressions.
{"title":"The temporal logic of media practices: Mourning and the tooling of time on Facebook","authors":"Sarit Navon","doi":"10.1177/14614448251381725","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251381725","url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces the concept of <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">temporal logic</jats:italic> to theorize how users engage with time as part of their media practices. Analyzing 40 cases of mourning and memorialization practices across Facebook’s Profiles, Groups, and Pages, the study identifies three core components: a twofold engagement with time (calendric and discursive), temporal introspection, and temporal convergence. The calendric use of time involves specific dates that serve as temporal triggers for posting, while the discursive use describes how users embed time into their posts—through rich and repeated time expressions, poetic narration, and so on. Time becomes a communicative resource, not merely a contextual background but an active rhetorical and affective tool. <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Temporal introspection</jats:italic> captures how social media platforms invite users to articulate their inner experience of time, and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">temporal convergence</jats:italic> reveals how multiple temporal layers—personal and collective, offline and online—converge on a single platform, giving rise to new rituals and expressions.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145397908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study qualitatively investigates user responses to privacy invasion by social media algorithms and identifies the fundamental needs that drive the feelings of privacy violation. In-depth interviews with 17 users in the United States revealed that the dimensions of physical, social, informational, and psychological privacy, originally defined in interpersonal communication, can be extended to human–algorithm interaction and are still deemed to be significant by users. Popular episodes of privacy invasions showed three main themes that privacy violation perceptions are grounded upon: lack of choice, non-interpretability of algorithms, and lack of understanding and respect. The three basic human needs for growth and motivation proposed by the self-determination theory (SDT) – autonomy, competence, and relatedness – are extended to understand why these invasions matter to users.
{"title":"Understanding the dimensions and violation of privacy in human–algorithm interaction: A self-determination theory perspective","authors":"Jeeyun Oh, Hyunjin Kang, Eunjoo Jin, Tingting Yang, Nazira Banu, Shuer Zhuo","doi":"10.1177/14614448251378019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251378019","url":null,"abstract":"This study qualitatively investigates user responses to privacy invasion by social media algorithms and identifies the fundamental needs that drive the feelings of privacy violation. In-depth interviews with 17 users in the United States revealed that the dimensions of physical, social, informational, and psychological privacy, originally defined in interpersonal communication, can be extended to human–algorithm interaction and are still deemed to be significant by users. Popular episodes of privacy invasions showed three main themes that privacy violation perceptions are grounded upon: lack of choice, non-interpretability of algorithms, and lack of understanding and respect. The three basic human needs for growth and motivation proposed by the self-determination theory (SDT) – autonomy, competence, and relatedness – are extended to understand why these invasions matter to users.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145311036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-17DOI: 10.1177/14614448251384255
Jack Black, Theo Lynn, Itoiz Rodrigo-Jusue, Daniel Kilvington
Exploring how online hate speech infiltrates public discourse, this article examines the antisemitic hashtag, ‘#JewGoal’, tracing its spread from the FIFA gaming community to online football discussions. Analysing 1364 public tweets on the platform ‘X’ (formerly Twitter), the article illustrates how the hashtag, framed as humour and sports commentary, perpetuated antisemitic stereotypes through historical tropes and cultural symbols. Utilizing the Lacanian concepts of jouissance and llanguage , the study reveals how #JewGoal extended beyond mere humour, exposing an excessive enjoyment tied to its repetitive and absurd use. This dual function – offering inclusion in online communities while perpetuating harm – underscores how normalized antisemitic language infiltrates sports fandom. By framing #JewGoal as a llanguage of hate, its impact lies not in explicit content but in its provocative repetition. By detailing the persistence of antisemitism in digital spaces, the article emphasizes the need to critically address the enjoyment derived from harmful online speech.
{"title":"#JewGoal: Llanguage , enjoyment, and the persistence of antisemitism in online gaming and sports communities","authors":"Jack Black, Theo Lynn, Itoiz Rodrigo-Jusue, Daniel Kilvington","doi":"10.1177/14614448251384255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251384255","url":null,"abstract":"Exploring how online hate speech infiltrates public discourse, this article examines the antisemitic hashtag, ‘#JewGoal’, tracing its spread from the FIFA gaming community to online football discussions. Analysing 1364 public tweets on the platform ‘X’ (formerly Twitter), the article illustrates how the hashtag, framed as humour and sports commentary, perpetuated antisemitic stereotypes through historical tropes and cultural symbols. Utilizing the Lacanian concepts of <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">jouissance</jats:italic> and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">llanguage</jats:italic> , the study reveals how #JewGoal extended beyond mere humour, exposing an excessive enjoyment tied to its repetitive and absurd use. This dual function – offering inclusion in online communities while perpetuating harm – underscores how normalized antisemitic language infiltrates sports fandom. By framing #JewGoal as a <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">llanguage</jats:italic> of hate, its impact lies not in explicit content but in its provocative repetition. By detailing the persistence of antisemitism in digital spaces, the article emphasizes the need to critically address the enjoyment derived from harmful online speech.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145310746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-17DOI: 10.1177/14614448251380678
Julie Dereymaeker
Baby monitoring technologies (BMTs) are increasingly sophisticated and marketed as essential tools for responsible parenting, reinforcing expectations of constant vigilance and care. This study investigates how parents domesticate BMTs and how responsibilisation manifests in this process. The study draws on in-depth interviews with 15 Flemish families and employs constructivist grounded theory analysis. Findings show this domestication is an agentic negotiation where parents balance elements of reassurance, autonomy, rationality, peace of mind, cost considerations and the ideal of letting go. This negotiation, however, is framed by a process of moral responsibilisation which manifests through three distinct but interconnected pathways: the self-guided, social and technologically imposed pathways. This process challenges the delegation of care to trusted caregivers and calls for a critical assessment of the expansion of monitoring technologies. As these technologies enable parental omnipresence, the choice not to monitor one’s child may shift from a personal decision to a political act.
{"title":"Responsible parents on guard: Exploring domestication and responsibilisation in parents’ lived experiences with baby monitoring technologies","authors":"Julie Dereymaeker","doi":"10.1177/14614448251380678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251380678","url":null,"abstract":"Baby monitoring technologies (BMTs) are increasingly sophisticated and marketed as essential tools for responsible parenting, reinforcing expectations of constant vigilance and care. This study investigates how parents domesticate BMTs and how responsibilisation manifests in this process. The study draws on in-depth interviews with 15 Flemish families and employs constructivist grounded theory analysis. Findings show this domestication is an agentic negotiation where parents balance elements of reassurance, autonomy, rationality, peace of mind, cost considerations and the ideal of letting go. This negotiation, however, is framed by a process of moral responsibilisation which manifests through three distinct but interconnected pathways: the self-guided, social and technologically imposed pathways. This process challenges the delegation of care to trusted caregivers and calls for a critical assessment of the expansion of monitoring technologies. As these technologies enable parental omnipresence, the choice <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">not</jats:italic> to monitor one’s child may shift from a personal decision to a political act.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"342 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145311037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}