Clara-Christina E. Gerstner, Paul A. McDermott, Emily M. Weiss, Michael J. Rovine, Frank C. Worrell, Tracey E. Hall
Caregivers who interact with children at home can provide a critical, complementary perspective on a child's behaviour functioning. This research used a parent-administered measure of problem behaviours to study perceptions of child behaviours across home situations. We applied latent profile analysis to identify subgroups of children with common behavioural tendencies in a nationally representative sample (N = 709) of 4- to 13-year-old children in Trinidad and Tobago. This study (a) identified latent profiles of children's over- and underactive behaviour problems in varied home settings and (b) examined how profile membership predicted academic skills and teacher-observed problem behaviours. The best-fitting four-profile model included one profile of adjusted behaviours (56%), one of the elevated attention-seeking behaviours (21%), a profile featuring withdrawn and disengaged behaviours (15%) and a relatively rare profile emphasising aggressive behaviours (8%). Children classified in the last profile displayed the poorest academic outcomes and the highest levels of teacher-observed behaviour problems.
{"title":"Latent profiles of home behaviour problems in Trinidad and Tobago","authors":"Clara-Christina E. Gerstner, Paul A. McDermott, Emily M. Weiss, Michael J. Rovine, Frank C. Worrell, Tracey E. Hall","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13261","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13261","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Caregivers who interact with children at home can provide a critical, complementary perspective on a child's behaviour functioning. This research used a parent-administered measure of problem behaviours to study perceptions of child behaviours across home situations. We applied latent profile analysis to identify subgroups of children with common behavioural tendencies in a nationally representative sample (<i>N</i> = 709) of 4- to 13-year-old children in Trinidad and Tobago. This study (a) identified latent profiles of children's over- and underactive behaviour problems in varied home settings and (b) examined how profile membership predicted academic skills and teacher-observed problem behaviours. The best-fitting four-profile model included one profile of adjusted behaviours (56%), one of the elevated attention-seeking behaviours (21%), a profile featuring withdrawn and disengaged behaviours (15%) and a relatively rare profile emphasising aggressive behaviours (8%). Children classified in the last profile displayed the poorest academic outcomes and the highest levels of teacher-observed behaviour problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tuo Liu, Ruyi Ding, Zhonghuang Su, Zixuan Peng, Andrea Hildebrandt
Understanding the differential strength of effects in the presence of a third variable, known as a moderation effect, is a common research goal in many psychological and behavioural science fields. If structural equation modelling is applied to test effects of interest, the investigation of differential strength of effects will typically ask how parameters of a latent variable model are influenced by categorical or continuous moderators, such as age, socio-economic status, personality traits, etc. Traditional approaches to continuous moderators in SEMs predominantly address linear moderation effects, risking the oversight of nonlinear effects. Moreover, some approaches have methodological limitations, for example, the need to categorise moderators or to pre-specify parametric forms of moderation. This tutorial introduces local structural equation modelling (LSEM) in a non-technical way. LSEM is a nonparametric approach that allows the analysis of nonlinear moderation effects without the above-mentioned limitations. Using an empirical dataset, we demonstrate the implementation of LSEM through the R-sirt package, emphasising its versatility in both exploratory analysis of nonlinear moderation without prior knowledge and confirmatory testing of hypothesised moderation functions. The tutorial also addresses common modelling issues and extends the discussion to different application scenarios, demonstrating its flexibility.
在存在第三个变量(即调节效应)的情况下,了解效应的不同强度是许多心理和行为科学领域的共同研究目标。如果应用结构方程模型来检验感兴趣的效应,那么对效应强度差异的研究通常会询问潜变量模型的参数如何受到分类或连续调节因子(如年龄、社会经济地位、人格特质等)的影响。在 SEM 中研究连续调节因子的传统方法主要针对线性调节效应,存在忽略非线性效应的风险。此外,有些方法还存在方法上的局限性,例如需要对调节因子进行分类或预先指定调节的参数形式。本教程以非技术方式介绍局部结构方程建模(LSEM)。LSEM 是一种非参数方法,可以分析非线性调节效应,而不受上述限制。我们使用一个经验数据集,通过 R-sirt 软件包演示了 LSEM 的实现,强调了 LSEM 在无先验知识的非线性调节探索性分析和假设调节函数的确认性测试中的多功能性。教程还讨论了常见的建模问题,并将讨论扩展到不同的应用场景,展示了其灵活性。
{"title":"Modelling nonlinear moderation effects with local structural equation modelling (LSEM): A non-technical introduction","authors":"Tuo Liu, Ruyi Ding, Zhonghuang Su, Zixuan Peng, Andrea Hildebrandt","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13259","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13259","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the differential strength of effects in the presence of a third variable, known as a moderation effect, is a common research goal in many psychological and behavioural science fields. If structural equation modelling is applied to test effects of interest, the investigation of differential strength of effects will typically ask how parameters of a latent variable model are influenced by categorical or continuous moderators, such as age, socio-economic status, personality traits, etc. Traditional approaches to continuous moderators in SEMs predominantly address linear moderation effects, risking the oversight of nonlinear effects. Moreover, some approaches have methodological limitations, for example, the need to categorise moderators or to pre-specify parametric forms of moderation. This tutorial introduces local structural equation modelling (LSEM) in a non-technical way. LSEM is a nonparametric approach that allows the analysis of nonlinear moderation effects without the above-mentioned limitations. Using an empirical dataset, we demonstrate the implementation of LSEM through the R-sirt package, emphasising its versatility in both exploratory analysis of nonlinear moderation without prior knowledge and confirmatory testing of hypothesised moderation functions. The tutorial also addresses common modelling issues and extends the discussion to different application scenarios, demonstrating its flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626091/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Materialism is fundamental to the human value or goal system; therefore, an understanding of its level among Chinese college students and its changes over time is of great value. In the present study, a cross-temporal meta-analysis was performed by reviewing studies that conducted Material Values Scale-based assessment of the materialism level among Chinese university students from 2007 to 2020. Moreover, a time lag analysis was performed to clarify whether variations in materialism level are interpretable with macro-social indicators. Finally, 82 articles on studies enrolling a total of 45,966 Chinese university students were reviewed. The materialism score significantly increased on a yearly basis. Furthermore, macro-social changes in diverse areas, including economic condition (gross domestic product per capita, consumption level of all residents and national disposable income per capita), social connectedness (urbanisation degree and divorce ratio) and overall threat (rate of university enrollment), were the major factors influencing the degree of materialism among the students. By identifying the inclining trend of materialism among these college students across time and using relevant macro-social indicators, a theoretical three-dimensional framework was established to elucidate the degree of materialism among Chinese college students as a group.
{"title":"Materialism in Chinese college students during 2007–2020: The influence of social change on the inclining trend","authors":"Qian Su, Yuan Liang, Juan Qiao, Jiuming Wang","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13260","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13260","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Materialism is fundamental to the human value or goal system; therefore, an understanding of its level among Chinese college students and its changes over time is of great value. In the present study, a cross-temporal meta-analysis was performed by reviewing studies that conducted Material Values Scale-based assessment of the materialism level among Chinese university students from 2007 to 2020. Moreover, a time lag analysis was performed to clarify whether variations in materialism level are interpretable with macro-social indicators. Finally, 82 articles on studies enrolling a total of 45,966 Chinese university students were reviewed. The materialism score significantly increased on a yearly basis. Furthermore, macro-social changes in diverse areas, including economic condition (gross domestic product per capita, consumption level of all residents and national disposable income per capita), social connectedness (urbanisation degree and divorce ratio) and overall threat (rate of university enrollment), were the major factors influencing the degree of materialism among the students. By identifying the inclining trend of materialism among these college students across time and using relevant macro-social indicators, a theoretical three-dimensional framework was established to elucidate the degree of materialism among Chinese college students as a group.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander M. Schoemann, E. Whitney G. Moore, Gokhan Yagiz
Mediation models are often conducted in psychology to understand mechanisms and processes of change. However, current best practices for handling missing data in mediation models are not always used by researchers. Missing data methods, such as full information maximum likelihood (FIML) and multiple imputation (MI), are best practice methods of handling missing data. However, FIML or MI are rarely used to handle missing data when testing mediation models, instead analyses used listwise deletion methods, the default in popular software. Compared to listwise deletion, the implementation of FIML or MI to handle missing data reduces parameter estimate bias, while maintaining the sample collected to maximise power and generalizability of results. In this tutorial, we review how to implement full-information maximum likelihood and MI using best practice methods of testing the indirect effect. We demonstrate how to implement these methods using both R and JASP, which are both free, open-source software programmes and provide online supplemental materials for these demonstrations. These methods are demonstrated using two example analyses, one using a cross-sectional mediation model and one using a longitudinal mediation model examining how student-athletes reported worry about COVID predicts their perceived stress, which in turn predicts satisfaction with life.
心理学界经常使用中介模型来了解变化的机制和过程。然而,研究人员并不总是使用当前处理中介模型中缺失数据的最佳方法。缺失数据处理方法,如全信息最大似然法(FIML)和多重估算法(MI),是处理缺失数据的最佳实践方法。然而,在测试中介模型时,FIML 或 MI 很少被用来处理缺失数据,相反,分析使用了列表删除法,这是流行软件的默认方法。与列表删除法相比,使用 FIML 或 MI 处理缺失数据可减少参数估计偏差,同时保持所收集的样本以最大限度地提高结果的功率和普适性。在本教程中,我们将回顾如何使用测试间接效应的最佳实践方法来实施全信息极大似然法和多元回归法。我们演示了如何使用 R 和 JASP(均为免费开源软件程序)实施这些方法,并为这些演示提供了在线补充材料。我们使用两个示例分析来演示这些方法,一个是横截面中介模型,另一个是纵向中介模型,研究学生运动员报告的对 COVID 的担忧如何预测他们的感知压力,而感知压力又如何预测生活满意度。
{"title":"How and why to follow best practices for testing mediation models with missing data","authors":"Alexander M. Schoemann, E. Whitney G. Moore, Gokhan Yagiz","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13257","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13257","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mediation models are often conducted in psychology to understand mechanisms and processes of change. However, current best practices for handling missing data in mediation models are not always used by researchers. Missing data methods, such as full information maximum likelihood (FIML) and multiple imputation (MI), are best practice methods of handling missing data. However, FIML or MI are rarely used to handle missing data when testing mediation models, instead analyses used listwise deletion methods, the default in popular software. Compared to listwise deletion, the implementation of FIML or MI to handle missing data reduces parameter estimate bias, while maintaining the sample collected to maximise power and generalizability of results. In this tutorial, we review how to implement full-information maximum likelihood and MI using best practice methods of testing the indirect effect. We demonstrate how to implement these methods using both R and JASP, which are both free, open-source software programmes and provide online supplemental materials for these demonstrations. These methods are demonstrated using two example analyses, one using a cross-sectional mediation model and one using a longitudinal mediation model examining how student-athletes reported worry about COVID predicts their perceived stress, which in turn predicts satisfaction with life.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625877/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ben C. Winestone, Glenn A. Melvin, Ruth Tatnell, David J. Hallford
The current study aimed to assess whether online suicide risk assessment affects state mood and is the first to examine if suicide-related self-stigma or coping related to suicidal ideation are predictors of mood change. The Australian participants (N = 661, Mage = 34.9, SD = 12.3, 57.1% female), recruited through a crowd-sourcing platform, completed a visual analogue mood measure before and after the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), an assessment tool. Followed by a modified version of the Internalised Stigma Scale, the Brief COPE and DASS-21. State mood did not change from pre- to post-suicide risk assessment in the overall sample, t(662) = −.16, p = .868, d = −.01. Contrary to hypotheses, neither self-stigma nor coping were related to mood change following exposure to the SIDAS. The multiple regression model was not significant, F(9,643) = 1.16, p = .31., nor was any single predictor including gender, current Suicide risk β = −.04, t = −.80 or psychological distress β = −.09, t = −1.76, p = .08. These findings suggest that online exposure to a suicide risk tool is unlikely to be iatrogenic in relation to state mood, even in the context of elevated self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress.
本研究旨在评估在线自杀风险评估是否会影响状态情绪,并首次研究与自杀相关的自我污名或与自杀意念相关的应对措施是否是情绪变化的预测因素。通过众包平台招募的澳大利亚参与者(N = 661,Mage = 34.9,SD = 12.3,57.1%为女性)在使用评估工具自杀意念属性量表(SIDAS)前后完成了视觉模拟情绪测量。之后还完成了修改版内化耻辱感量表、简短 COPE 和 DASS-21。在总体样本中,自杀风险评估前后的状态情绪没有变化,t(662)= -.16,p = .868,d = -.01。与假设相反,在接触 SIDAS 后,自我耻辱感和应对方式都与情绪变化无关。多元回归模型不显著(F(9,643) = 1.16, p = .31.),包括性别、当前自杀风险 β = -.04, t = -.80 或心理困扰 β = -.09, t = -1.76, p = .08在内的任何单一预测因子也不显著。这些研究结果表明,即使在自我污名、自杀意念和心理困扰升高的情况下,在线接触自杀风险工具也不太可能对状态情绪产生先天性影响。
{"title":"Brief online suicide risk assessment of adults does not affect state mood, even in the context of elevated suicidality self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress","authors":"Ben C. Winestone, Glenn A. Melvin, Ruth Tatnell, David J. Hallford","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13256","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13256","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study aimed to assess whether online suicide risk assessment affects state mood and is the first to examine if suicide-related self-stigma or coping related to suicidal ideation are predictors of mood change. The Australian participants (<i>N</i> = 661, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34.9, <i>SD</i> = 12.3, 57.1% female), recruited through a crowd-sourcing platform, completed a visual analogue mood measure before and after the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), an assessment tool. Followed by a modified version of the Internalised Stigma Scale, the Brief COPE and DASS-21. State mood did not change from pre- to post-suicide risk assessment in the overall sample, <i>t</i>(662) = −.16, <i>p</i> = .868, <i>d</i> = −.01. Contrary to hypotheses, neither self-stigma nor coping were related to mood change following exposure to the SIDAS. The multiple regression model was not significant, <i>F</i>(9,643) = 1.16, <i>p</i> = .31., nor was any single predictor including gender, current Suicide risk β = −.04, <i>t</i> = −.80 or psychological distress β = −.09, <i>t</i> = −1.76, <i>p</i> = .08. These findings suggest that online exposure to a suicide risk tool is unlikely to be iatrogenic in relation to state mood, even in the context of elevated self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"59 6","pages":"1347-1352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.13256","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Qijin Chen, Kun Su, Yonglin Feng, Lijin Zhang, Ruyi Ding, Junhao Pan
This paper explores the utilisation of Bayesian structural equation modelling (BSEM) in psychology, highlighting its advantages over frequentist methods for handling complex models and small sample sizes. Basic concepts and fundamental issues relevant to BSEM are introduced, such as prior setting, model convergence, and model fit evaluation and so on. The paper also provides illustrative examples of commonly employed BSEMs, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models, mediation models and multigroup CFA models, accompanied by empirical data and computer codes to facilitate implementation. Our goal is to provide researchers with novel ideas for empirical research and equip them to overcome challenges inherent to traditional methods. As BSEM continues to gain traction in various fields, we anticipate its development will feature improved methods, techniques and reporting standards.
本文探讨了贝叶斯结构方程建模(BSEM)在心理学中的应用,强调了其在处理复杂模型和小样本量时优于频数主义方法的优势。文中介绍了与贝叶斯结构方程建模相关的基本概念和基本问题,如先验设定、模型收敛和模型拟合度评估等。本文还提供了常用 BSEM 的示例,包括确证因子分析(CFA)模型、中介模型和多组 CFA 模型,并附有经验数据和计算机代码,以便于实施。我们的目标是为研究人员提供实证研究的新思路,使他们能够克服传统方法固有的挑战。随着 BSEM 在各个领域的不断发展,我们预计其发展将以改进方法、技术和报告标准为特色。
{"title":"A tutorial on Bayesian structural equation modelling: Principles and applications","authors":"Qijin Chen, Kun Su, Yonglin Feng, Lijin Zhang, Ruyi Ding, Junhao Pan","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13258","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13258","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper explores the utilisation of Bayesian structural equation modelling (BSEM) in psychology, highlighting its advantages over frequentist methods for handling complex models and small sample sizes. Basic concepts and fundamental issues relevant to BSEM are introduced, such as prior setting, model convergence, and model fit evaluation and so on. The paper also provides illustrative examples of commonly employed BSEMs, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models, mediation models and multigroup CFA models, accompanied by empirical data and computer codes to facilitate implementation. Our goal is to provide researchers with novel ideas for empirical research and equip them to overcome challenges inherent to traditional methods. As BSEM continues to gain traction in various fields, we anticipate its development will feature improved methods, techniques and reporting standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"59 6","pages":"1326-1346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142401624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-efficacy beliefs have cyclical nature as they enhance performance and performance, in turn, influences subsequent self-efficacy beliefs. Likewise, teacher self-efficacy is proposed to shape teaching quality which, in turn, informs future teacher self-efficacy beliefs. To examine these associations, longitudinal studies are needed but are still sparse. Therefore, the present research employed a three-wave longitudinal design to examine the predictive effects of teacher self-efficacy on teaching quality as well as the predictive effects of teaching quality on future teacher self-efficacy by using data from large samples of secondary school teachers (N = 1030) and their students (N = 17,381). Teachers self-reported their efficacy for student engagement, efficacy for instructional strategies and efficacy for classroom management whereas students rated the teaching quality (i.e., cognitive activation, classroom management, and student support) of their teachers. The results of the multilevel structural equation modelling showed that all three dimensions of teacher self-efficacy predicted teaching quality but teaching quality, in turn, predicted only teacher efficacy for student engagement. These results suggest that efforts in raising teacher self-efficacy may show fruitful in raising overall teaching effectiveness.
{"title":"Teacher self-efficacy and teaching quality: A three-wave longitudinal investigation","authors":"Irena Burić, Krešimir Jakšić, Barbara Balaž","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13255","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13255","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Self-efficacy beliefs have cyclical nature as they enhance performance and performance, in turn, influences subsequent self-efficacy beliefs. Likewise, teacher self-efficacy is proposed to shape teaching quality which, in turn, informs future teacher self-efficacy beliefs. To examine these associations, longitudinal studies are needed but are still sparse. Therefore, the present research employed a three-wave longitudinal design to examine the predictive effects of teacher self-efficacy on teaching quality as well as the predictive effects of teaching quality on future teacher self-efficacy by using data from large samples of secondary school teachers (<i>N</i> = 1030) and their students (<i>N</i> = 17,381). Teachers self-reported their efficacy for student engagement, efficacy for instructional strategies and efficacy for classroom management whereas students rated the teaching quality (i.e., cognitive activation, classroom management, and student support) of their teachers. The results of the multilevel structural equation modelling showed that all three dimensions of teacher self-efficacy predicted teaching quality but teaching quality, in turn, predicted only teacher efficacy for student engagement. These results suggest that efforts in raising teacher self-efficacy may show fruitful in raising overall teaching effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"59 6","pages":"1317-1325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The recent advances in technological capabilities have led to a massive production of time-series data and remarkable progress in longitudinal designs and analyses within psychological research. However, implementing time-series analysis can be challenging due to the various characteristics and complexities involved, as well as the need for statistical expertise. This paper introduces a statistical pipeline on time-series analysis for studying the changes in a single process over time at either a population or individual level, both retrospectively and prospectively. This is achieved through systemization and extension of existing modelling and inference techniques. This analytical approach enables practitioners not only to track but also to model and evaluate emerging trends and apparent seasonality. It also allows for the detection of unexpected events, quantifying their deviations from baseline and forecasting future values. Given that other discernible population- and individual-level changes in psychological and behavioural processes have not yet emerged, continued surveillance is warranted. A near real-time monitoring tool of time-series data could guide community psychological responses across multiple ecological levels, making it a valuable resource for field practitioners and psychologists. An empirical study is conducted to illustrate the implementation of the introduced analytical pipeline in practice and to demonstrate its capabilities.
{"title":"An analytical approach for identifying trend-seasonal components and detecting unexpected behaviour in psychological time-series","authors":"Christina Parpoula","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13244","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13244","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recent advances in technological capabilities have led to a massive production of time-series data and remarkable progress in longitudinal designs and analyses within psychological research. However, implementing time-series analysis can be challenging due to the various characteristics and complexities involved, as well as the need for statistical expertise. This paper introduces a statistical pipeline on time-series analysis for studying the changes in a single process over time at either a population or individual level, both retrospectively and prospectively. This is achieved through systemization and extension of existing modelling and inference techniques. This analytical approach enables practitioners not only to track but also to model and evaluate emerging trends and apparent seasonality. It also allows for the detection of unexpected events, quantifying their deviations from baseline and forecasting future values. Given that other discernible population- and individual-level changes in psychological and behavioural processes have not yet emerged, continued surveillance is warranted. A near real-time monitoring tool of time-series data could guide community psychological responses across multiple ecological levels, making it a valuable resource for field practitioners and psychologists. An empirical study is conducted to illustrate the implementation of the introduced analytical pipeline in practice and to demonstrate its capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"59 6","pages":"1307-1316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.13244","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Consistent with reporting standards for structural equation modelling (SEM), model fit should be evaluated at two different levels, global and local. Global fit concerns the overall or average correspondence between the entire data matrix and the model, given the parameter estimates for the model. Local fit is evaluated at the level of the residuals, or differences between observed and predicted associations for every pair of measured variables in the model. It can happen that models with apparently satisfactory global fit can nevertheless have problematic local fit. This may be especially true for relatively large models with many variables, where serious misspecification is indicated by some larger residuals, but their contribution to global fit is diluted when averaged together with all the other smaller residuals. It can be challenging to evaluate local fit in large models with dozens or even hundreds of variables and corresponding residuals. Thus, the main goal of this tutorial is to offer suggestions about how to efficiently evaluate and describe local fit for large structural equation models. An empirical example is described where all data, syntax and output files are freely available to readers.
{"title":"How to evaluate local fit (residuals) in large structural equation models","authors":"Rex B. Kline","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13252","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13252","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consistent with reporting standards for structural equation modelling (SEM), model fit should be evaluated at two different levels, global and local. Global fit concerns the overall or average correspondence between the entire data matrix and the model, given the parameter estimates for the model. Local fit is evaluated at the level of the residuals, or differences between observed and predicted associations for every pair of measured variables in the model. It can happen that models with apparently satisfactory global fit can nevertheless have problematic local fit. This may be especially true for relatively large models with many variables, where serious misspecification is indicated by some larger residuals, but their contribution to global fit is diluted when averaged together with all the other smaller residuals. It can be challenging to evaluate local fit in large models with dozens or even hundreds of variables and corresponding residuals. Thus, the main goal of this tutorial is to offer suggestions about how to efficiently evaluate and describe local fit for large structural equation models. An empirical example is described where all data, syntax and output files are freely available to readers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"59 6","pages":"1293-1306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.13252","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ordinal data such as Likert items, ratings or generic ordered variables are widespread in psychology. These variables are usually analysed using metric models (e.g., standard linear regression) with important drawbacks in terms of statistical inference (reduced power and increased type-1 error) and prediction. One possible reason for not using ordinal regression models could be difficulty in understanding parameters or conducting a power analysis. The tutorial aims to present ordinal regression models using a simulation-based approach. Firstly, we introduced the general model highlighting crucial components and assumptions. Then, we explained how to interpret parameters for a logit and probit model. Then we proposed two ways for simulating data as a function of predictors showing a 2 × 2 interaction with categorical predictors and the interaction between a numeric and categorical predictor. Finally, we showed an example of power analysis using simulations that can be easily extended to complex models with multiple predictors. The tutorial is supported by a collection of custom R functions developed to simulate and understand ordinal regression models. The code to reproduce the proposed simulation, the custom R functions and additional examples of ordinal regression models can be found on the online Open Science Framework repository ( https://osf.io/93h5j).
李克特项目、评分或一般有序变量等序数数据在心理学中非常普遍。这些变量通常使用度量模型(如标准线性回归)进行分析,但在统计推断(功率降低和类型-1 误差增加)和预测方面存在重大缺陷。不使用序数回归模型的一个可能原因是难以理解参数或进行功率分析。本教程旨在使用基于模拟的方法介绍序数回归模型。首先,我们介绍了一般模型,强调了关键组成部分和假设。然后,我们解释了如何解释 logit 和 probit 模型的参数。然后,我们提出了模拟数据作为预测因子函数的两种方法,显示了与分类预测因子的 2 × 2 交互作用,以及数字预测因子与分类预测因子之间的交互作用。最后,我们展示了一个使用模拟进行幂次分析的示例,该示例可轻松扩展到具有多个预测因子的复杂模型。本教程由一系列为模拟和理解序数回归模型而开发的自定义 R 函数提供支持。您可以在在线开放科学框架资源库(https://osf.io/93h5j)中找到重现所提议模拟的代码、自定义 R 函数和其他序数回归模型示例。
{"title":"Ordinal regression models made easy: A tutorial on parameter interpretation, data simulation and power analysis","authors":"Filippo Gambarota, Gianmarco Altoè","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13243","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ijop.13243","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ordinal data such as Likert items, ratings or generic ordered variables are widespread in psychology. These variables are usually analysed using metric models (e.g., standard linear regression) with important drawbacks in terms of statistical inference (reduced power and increased type-1 error) and prediction. One possible reason for not using ordinal regression models could be difficulty in understanding parameters or conducting a power analysis. The tutorial aims to present ordinal regression models using a simulation-based approach. Firstly, we introduced the general model highlighting crucial components and assumptions. Then, we explained how to interpret parameters for a logit and probit model. Then we proposed two ways for simulating data as a function of predictors showing a 2 × 2 interaction with categorical predictors and the interaction between a numeric and categorical predictor. Finally, we showed an example of power analysis using simulations that can be easily extended to complex models with multiple predictors. The tutorial is supported by a collection of custom R functions developed to simulate and understand ordinal regression models. The code to reproduce the proposed simulation, the custom R functions and additional examples of ordinal regression models can be found on the online Open Science Framework repository (\u0000https://osf.io/93h5j).</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"59 6","pages":"1263-1292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.13243","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142362272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}