Pub Date : 2024-11-29DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103864
Minika Ekanem , Bram Noble , Greg Poelzer
Institutional layering is a dominant mode of change in shaping energy transitions, whereby new institutional rules or practices are added on top of or alongside existing ones. Characterized by the introduction of new actors, policies, and expanding energy arenas, energy transition processes can become progressively layered, resulting in institutional complexity and potentially undermining energy transition goals. This paper explores the impact of layering on actors and on the outcomes of energy transitions. A conceptual framework that integrates institutional change with a layering typology is developed and applied to Norway's electricity sector reform as a case study. Results show that Norway's energy landscape has become more diversified, leading to complex institutional arrangements, differential growth in the energy sector, and gaps between reform intentions versus outcomes. Whether layering produces the intended energy transition outcomes depends on the complexity of layering, the interaction, coordination, and alignment of the layered elements, and the vested interest of stakeholders. Insights from Norway's experience can guide institutional design to support the rapid expansion of renewable energy investments, or the reform or restructurings of existing energy institutions.
{"title":"The effects of institutional layering on electricity sector reform: Lessons from Norway's electricity sector","authors":"Minika Ekanem , Bram Noble , Greg Poelzer","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103864","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103864","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Institutional layering is a dominant mode of change in shaping energy transitions, whereby new institutional rules or practices are added on top of or alongside existing ones. Characterized by the introduction of new actors, policies, and expanding energy arenas, energy transition processes can become progressively layered, resulting in institutional complexity and potentially undermining energy transition goals. This paper explores the impact of layering on actors and on the outcomes of energy transitions. A conceptual framework that integrates institutional change with a layering typology is developed and applied to Norway's electricity sector reform as a case study. Results show that Norway's energy landscape has become more diversified, leading to complex institutional arrangements, differential growth in the energy sector, and gaps between reform intentions versus outcomes. Whether layering produces the intended energy transition outcomes depends on the complexity of layering, the interaction, coordination, and alignment of the layered elements, and the vested interest of stakeholders. Insights from Norway's experience can guide institutional design to support the rapid expansion of renewable energy investments, or the reform or restructurings of existing energy institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103864"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142747759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-29DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103855
Bolin Dong , Zhenhua Zhang , Cheng Zhou
Many countries have been actively implementing carbon neutrality initiatives. In September 2020, China, which is the second-largest economy and the top carbon emitter, publicly committed to reaching carbon neutrality by 2060. This paper presents a novel bibliometric visualisation analysis of the carbon neutrality policies developed in China to investigate the topics of these policies and determine whether China can achieve a just energy transition (JET). The results show that socioeconomic factors are insufficiently considered in the selected policies, which leads to conclusions about what insights are still needed to understand a JET in the pursuit of carbon neutrality and ensure that no one is left behind. Accordingly, this paper presents several policy implications for increasing social justice and achieving a better, more just energy transition. This work may inspire scholars and policymakers in China and other countries to pay more attention to the unemployment of vulnerable groups and other social justice issues. Moreover, this paper provides an opportunity to expand the academic horizon of the JET as a research field.
{"title":"Towards a just Chinese energy transition: Socioeconomic considerations in China's carbon neutrality policies","authors":"Bolin Dong , Zhenhua Zhang , Cheng Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103855","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103855","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many countries have been actively implementing carbon neutrality initiatives. In September 2020, China, which is the second-largest economy and the top carbon emitter, publicly committed to reaching carbon neutrality by 2060. This paper presents a novel bibliometric visualisation analysis of the carbon neutrality policies developed in China to investigate the topics of these policies and determine whether China can achieve a just energy transition (JET). The results show that socioeconomic factors are insufficiently considered in the selected policies, which leads to conclusions about what insights are still needed to understand a JET in the pursuit of carbon neutrality and ensure that no one is left behind. Accordingly, this paper presents several policy implications for increasing social justice and achieving a better, more just energy transition. This work may inspire scholars and policymakers in China and other countries to pay more attention to the unemployment of vulnerable groups and other social justice issues. Moreover, this paper provides an opportunity to expand the academic horizon of the JET as a research field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103855"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142747762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-29DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103858
Rafael Lembi , Maria Claudia Lopez , Karina Ninni Ramos , Igor Cavallini Johansen , Lázaro João Santana da Silva , Manoel Roberval Pimentel Santos , Gabriel Yúri Campos Lacerda , Gisele Souza Neuls , Emilio Moran
Participatory processes that emphasize energy justice and energy sovereignty are essential to provide electricity for those in need in just and sustainable ways. For isolated, off-grid communities, access to electricity remains a significant challenge, especially in the Global South. Participation is critical to ensuring the viability and sustainability of off-grid energy systems in remote areas, as communities need to be self-reliant in managing and maintaining their own systems. However, experiences of participatory co-design of community-owned, off-grid energy systems – including participation in the steps of planning, dimensioning, installation, training, and management – are still underreported in the literature. In collaboration with three off-grid communities in the municipality of Santarém in the Brazilian Amazon, we conducted a participatory co-design process that delivered photovoltaic systems and a hydrokinetic turbine, using microgrids to improve energy access. We describe and discuss how participation was facilitated through transdisciplinary methods, including participatory workshops, surveys, observations, and direct engagement with community members. Our theoretically grounded approach to community engagement advances both the theory and practice of place-based, just energy transitions. Moreover, it also offers a practical example of how energy justice and energy sovereignty could be empirically practiced by academics and practitioners alike.
{"title":"Towards energy justice and energy sovereignty: Participatory co-design of off-grid systems in the Brazilian Amazon","authors":"Rafael Lembi , Maria Claudia Lopez , Karina Ninni Ramos , Igor Cavallini Johansen , Lázaro João Santana da Silva , Manoel Roberval Pimentel Santos , Gabriel Yúri Campos Lacerda , Gisele Souza Neuls , Emilio Moran","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103858","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103858","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Participatory processes that emphasize energy justice and energy sovereignty are essential to provide electricity for those in need in just and sustainable ways. For isolated, off-grid communities, access to electricity remains a significant challenge, especially in the Global South. Participation is critical to ensuring the viability and sustainability of off-grid energy systems in remote areas, as communities need to be self-reliant in managing and maintaining their own systems. However, experiences of participatory co-design of community-owned, off-grid energy systems – including participation in the steps of planning, dimensioning, installation, training, and management – are still underreported in the literature. In collaboration with three off-grid communities in the municipality of Santarém in the Brazilian Amazon, we conducted a participatory co-design process that delivered photovoltaic systems and a hydrokinetic turbine, using microgrids to improve energy access. We describe and discuss how participation was facilitated through transdisciplinary methods, including participatory workshops, surveys, observations, and direct engagement with community members. Our theoretically grounded approach to community engagement advances both the theory and practice of place-based, just energy transitions. Moreover, it also offers a practical example of how energy justice and energy sovereignty could be empirically practiced by academics and practitioners alike.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103858"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142747760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-28DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103861
Behzad Zamanipour, Ilkka Keppo
The energy transition is shaped by the decisions of individuals. These decisions, in turn, are influenced by a diverse set of factors that have been the object of various studies reported in the literature. Most of these studies have, however, focused on a single decision or a sector. Here, we conduct for the Nordic countries a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of factors affecting four important consumers' energy-related decisions, namely (1) the choice between an electric or a conventional vehicle, (2) mode choice for personal transport, (3) choice of heating system, and (4) deployment of energy-saving measures at home. We aim to identify the implications that certain factors may have for many of such decisions, potentially encouraging some while discouraging others. Our analysis shows that a group of factors, such as attitude, comfort, costs, living in a detached house, emission implications of the choice, perceived behavioral control, environmental friendliness of the technology, and subjective norm, affect multiple decisions uniformly, in terms of the direction of effect the factor has on environmentally benign decisions. There are, however, also factors for which trade-offs exist, for example, while better public transport infrastructure encourages the use of public transport use, it discourages walking and cycling. We also show differences in outcomes between revealed and stated preferences surveys. Our analysis shows that for electric vehicle adoption, the statistical significance of factors typically increases when excluding the stated preferences surveys. Finally, our findings can aid policymakers in crafting more effective interventions to meet climate targets.
{"title":"What is important for consumers' energy-related decisions? A cross-sectoral systematic review and meta-analysis for the Nordic countries","authors":"Behzad Zamanipour, Ilkka Keppo","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103861","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103861","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The energy transition is shaped by the decisions of individuals. These decisions, in turn, are influenced by a diverse set of factors that have been the object of various studies reported in the literature. Most of these studies have, however, focused on a single decision or a sector. Here, we conduct for the Nordic countries a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of factors affecting four important consumers' energy-related decisions, namely (1) the choice between an electric or a conventional vehicle, (2) mode choice for personal transport, (3) choice of heating system, and (4) deployment of energy-saving measures at home. We aim to identify the implications that certain factors may have for many of such decisions, potentially encouraging some while discouraging others. Our analysis shows that a group of factors, such as attitude, comfort, costs, living in a detached house, emission implications of the choice, perceived behavioral control, environmental friendliness of the technology, and subjective norm, affect multiple decisions uniformly, in terms of the direction of effect the factor has on environmentally benign decisions. There are, however, also factors for which trade-offs exist, for example, while better public transport infrastructure encourages the use of public transport use, it discourages walking and cycling. We also show differences in outcomes between revealed and stated preferences surveys. Our analysis shows that for electric vehicle adoption, the statistical significance of factors typically increases when excluding the stated preferences surveys. Finally, our findings can aid policymakers in crafting more effective interventions to meet climate targets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103861"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142747757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103859
Amanda Martinez-Reyes, Sybren Wolters, Olaf Luijk, Özge Okur, Thomas Hoppe
A just energy transition requires not only the achievement of low-carbon goals but also the creation of fairer energy systems where special attention is given to identifying vulnerable groups and addressing the inequalities they experience. Governing energy transitions at the regional level may help formulate and implement tailored policies addressing vulnerabilities at the local level. However, there is limited understanding of the vulnerabilities that citizen groups experience in energy regions. We formulated three objectives to address this gap: I) identifying energy vulnerabilities in a regional transition context; II) understanding what citizen groups experience them and why; and III) identifying barriers that prevent policies from engaging with these groups. We applied a case-study research design to the Rotterdam-The Hague energy region in the Netherlands. Data collection involved semi-structured expert and stakeholder interviews and a review of newspaper articles and policy reports. We processed data with a thematic analysis drawing from energy justice literature and intersectionality theory. Three main energy vulnerabilities were identified: unaffordability of energy consumption, the lack of opportunity to own self-generation technology, and little to no inclusion in decision-making processes. The findings reveal five groups prone to vulnerability and the conditions that put them in a vulnerable situation, such as living in an energy-inefficient house. We conclude that regional energy transition policies should consider intersections of society while offering more support to municipalities to enable them to engage citizen groups at higher risk of energy vulnerability.
{"title":"Who is vulnerable in regional energy transitions? An intersectional energy justice analysis of the Rotterdam-the Hague region","authors":"Amanda Martinez-Reyes, Sybren Wolters, Olaf Luijk, Özge Okur, Thomas Hoppe","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103859","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103859","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A just energy transition requires not only the achievement of low-carbon goals but also the creation of fairer energy systems where special attention is given to identifying vulnerable groups and addressing the inequalities they experience. Governing energy transitions at the regional level may help formulate and implement tailored policies addressing vulnerabilities at the local level. However, there is limited understanding of the vulnerabilities that citizen groups experience in energy regions. We formulated three objectives to address this gap: I) identifying energy vulnerabilities in a regional transition context; II) understanding what citizen groups experience them and why; and III) identifying barriers that prevent policies from engaging with these groups. We applied a case-study research design to the Rotterdam-The Hague energy region in the Netherlands. Data collection involved semi-structured expert and stakeholder interviews and a review of newspaper articles and policy reports. We processed data with a thematic analysis drawing from energy justice literature and intersectionality theory. Three main energy vulnerabilities were identified: unaffordability of energy consumption, the lack of opportunity to own self-generation technology, and little to no inclusion in decision-making processes. The findings reveal five groups prone to vulnerability and the conditions that put them in a vulnerable situation, such as living in an energy-inefficient house. We conclude that regional energy transition policies should consider intersections of society while offering more support to municipalities to enable them to engage citizen groups at higher risk of energy vulnerability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103859"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142720579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103851
Nick Deknatel, Adriaan van der Loos
Limiting global temperature rise requires many carbon mitigation solutions, including carbon dioxide removal (CDR); however, commercial deployment of CDR is limited. Due to the intangible nature of negative carbon, market formation is challenging. This research analyzes the CDR technological innovation system in the European Union to unravel how market formation for such products can occur. The research focuses on voluntary (soft) and compliance (hard) carbon market institutions to understand their impact on the development of intangible products. Interviews were conducted with 26 CDR experts, complemented by a separate survey. Our results show that private certification programs governed by soft institutions are crucial in driving demand in the early market phase; subsequently, stringent market formation mechanisms governed by hard institutions will be essential to foster market acceleration. However, the exact shape of hard institutions is not yet clear. Overall, a combination of soft and hard institutions is crucial for market formation and diffusion of CDR technologies.
{"title":"The intangible technological innovation system: The role and influence of voluntary and compliance carbon markets on carbon dioxide removal in the European Union","authors":"Nick Deknatel, Adriaan van der Loos","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103851","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103851","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Limiting global temperature rise requires many carbon mitigation solutions, including carbon dioxide removal (CDR); however, commercial deployment of CDR is limited. Due to the intangible nature of negative carbon, market formation is challenging. This research analyzes the CDR technological innovation system in the European Union to unravel how market formation for such products can occur. The research focuses on voluntary (soft) and compliance (hard) carbon market institutions to understand their impact on the development of intangible products. Interviews were conducted with 26 CDR experts, complemented by a separate survey. Our results show that private certification programs governed by soft institutions are crucial in driving demand in the early market phase; subsequently, stringent market formation mechanisms governed by hard institutions will be essential to foster market acceleration. However, the exact shape of hard institutions is not yet clear. Overall, a combination of soft and hard institutions is crucial for market formation and diffusion of CDR technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103851"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142720671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103862
Carmel Dowling, Gerardo Otero
Achieving a 1.5 °C global temperature limit by 2050 has heightened the need for lithium extraction for energy storage. This is touted by governments and industry as essential to a clean, just energy transition. However, critiques reveal tensions between this ideal and the realities of lithium extraction, questioning whether it represents a continuation of extractive capitalism or a pathway to sustainable development grounded in social and environmental justice. Our critical review of the literature synthesizes lithium supply chain dynamics and interdisciplinary critiques of lithium extractivism. It exposes the contradictions and challenges in relying on lithium for climate solutions. Key issues include high water usage, toxic waste, CO₂ emissions, and deepening global inequalities along racial and class lines. We argue that meaningful reform requires both local engagement with affected communities, especially Indigenous groups, and robust state policies to democratize the extraction process.
{"title":"Mirages or miracles? Lithium extraction and the just energy transition","authors":"Carmel Dowling, Gerardo Otero","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103862","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103862","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving a 1.5 °C global temperature limit by 2050 has heightened the need for lithium extraction for energy storage. This is touted by governments and industry as essential to a clean, just energy transition. However, critiques reveal tensions between this ideal and the realities of lithium extraction, questioning whether it represents a continuation of extractive capitalism or a pathway to sustainable development grounded in social and environmental justice. Our critical review of the literature synthesizes lithium supply chain dynamics and interdisciplinary critiques of lithium extractivism. It exposes the contradictions and challenges in relying on lithium for climate solutions. Key issues include high water usage, toxic waste, CO₂ emissions, and deepening global inequalities along racial and class lines. We argue that meaningful reform requires both local engagement with affected communities, especially Indigenous groups, and robust state policies to democratize the extraction process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103862"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142697204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103807
T.M. Croon , E. Maghsoudi Nia , S. He , Q.K. Qian , M.G. Elsinga , J.S.C.M. Hoekstra , C. Van Ooij , A.J. Van der Wal
Rising energy prices across Europe have increased concerns over energy poverty. Despite significant scholarly focus on financial relief measures instituted by national governments, locally tailored crisis measures have remained overlooked. This study delves into the Dutch context, where part of the government's response to the energy crisis was decentralised, allowing municipalities considerable discretion in experimenting with energy poverty interventions. It compares two strategies: ‘energy coaching’ services – offering advice on sustainable energy practices – and shallow retrofitting by ‘fix teams’ – installing minor energy-saving measures in homes. The impact of these interventions on residential comfort, sustainable behaviour adoption, and (financial concerns regarding) energy bills is assessed through an extensive survey involving treatment and control groups coupled with detailed administrative data on households and dwellings. Results indicate that, on an aggregate level, local interventions significantly enhanced perceived comfort and reduced energy bills among the treatment groups. Comparing individual interventions, notably, more extensive ones such as fix teams and comprehensive energy coaching were significantly more impactful than those involving a single visit, highlighting the importance of continuous engagement. Additionally, we found that energy poverty status significantly amplified the effectiveness of these interventions, thereby stressing the importance of focusing efforts on vulnerable households.
{"title":"Energy coaching and ‘fix team’ retrofitting to mitigate energy poverty: An ex-post analysis of treatment and interaction effects","authors":"T.M. Croon , E. Maghsoudi Nia , S. He , Q.K. Qian , M.G. Elsinga , J.S.C.M. Hoekstra , C. Van Ooij , A.J. Van der Wal","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103807","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103807","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rising energy prices across Europe have increased concerns over energy poverty. Despite significant scholarly focus on financial relief measures instituted by national governments, locally tailored crisis measures have remained overlooked. This study delves into the Dutch context, where part of the government's response to the energy crisis was decentralised, allowing municipalities considerable discretion in experimenting with energy poverty interventions. It compares two strategies: ‘energy coaching’ services – offering advice on sustainable energy practices – and shallow retrofitting by ‘fix teams’ – installing minor energy-saving measures in homes. The impact of these interventions on residential comfort, sustainable behaviour adoption, and (financial concerns regarding) energy bills is assessed through an extensive survey involving treatment and control groups coupled with detailed administrative data on households and dwellings. Results indicate that, on an aggregate level, local interventions significantly enhanced perceived comfort and reduced energy bills among the treatment groups. Comparing individual interventions, notably, more extensive ones such as fix teams and comprehensive energy coaching were significantly more impactful than those involving a single visit, highlighting the importance of continuous engagement. Additionally, we found that energy poverty status significantly amplified the effectiveness of these interventions, thereby stressing the importance of focusing efforts on vulnerable households.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103807"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142720577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-25DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103839
Chris Riedy
Accelerating just energy transitions requires governance under uncertain conditions created by climate change, deregulated energy markets, policy volatility, accelerating technological development, and changing customer roles and expectations. In such an uncertain environment, there is a high risk that decisions will have unforeseen consequences that harm some actors, creating unjust outcomes. Energy systems must collectively develop the anticipatory capacity to explore future possibilities and the implications of different decisions and pathways for and with all affected actors. This paper assesses the anticipatory capacity of the Australian energy system and identifies ways it could be enhanced to accelerate just energy transitions. It draws on a review of representative industry publications, workshops and interviews with industry stakeholders to evaluate the mix of anticipatory practices, scope of anticipatory work, and types of anticipatory governance that prevail in the Australian energy system. Current practice is dominated by forecasting and normative foresighting approaches that do not sufficiently explore or respond to the diversity of plausible futures. Technological and economic drivers dominate anticipatory work, while politics and values are neglected. Anticipatory governance focuses primarily on assessing or pursuing probable futures to inform strategic policy planning and reduce future risks. The narrow range of current anticipatory practices leaves the sector vulnerable to trend changes, unanticipated customer behaviour, and stranding of assets, all of which can work against just transition. Opportunities exist to enhance anticipatory capacity by adopting a more holistic and coordinated approach, increasing institutional support, developing horizon scanning services and integrating household imaginaries into anticipatory planning.
{"title":"Enhancing anticipatory governance to accelerate just energy transitions in Australia","authors":"Chris Riedy","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103839","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103839","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accelerating just energy transitions requires governance under uncertain conditions created by climate change, deregulated energy markets, policy volatility, accelerating technological development, and changing customer roles and expectations. In such an uncertain environment, there is a high risk that decisions will have unforeseen consequences that harm some actors, creating unjust outcomes. Energy systems must collectively develop the anticipatory capacity to explore future possibilities and the implications of different decisions and pathways for and with all affected actors. This paper assesses the anticipatory capacity of the Australian energy system and identifies ways it could be enhanced to accelerate just energy transitions. It draws on a review of representative industry publications, workshops and interviews with industry stakeholders to evaluate the mix of anticipatory practices, scope of anticipatory work, and types of anticipatory governance that prevail in the Australian energy system. Current practice is dominated by forecasting and normative foresighting approaches that do not sufficiently explore or respond to the diversity of plausible futures. Technological and economic drivers dominate anticipatory work, while politics and values are neglected. Anticipatory governance focuses primarily on assessing or pursuing probable futures to inform strategic policy planning and reduce future risks. The narrow range of current anticipatory practices leaves the sector vulnerable to trend changes, unanticipated customer behaviour, and stranding of assets, all of which can work against just transition. Opportunities exist to enhance anticipatory capacity by adopting a more holistic and coordinated approach, increasing institutional support, developing horizon scanning services and integrating household imaginaries into anticipatory planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103839"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142697499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-23DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103818
Atar Herziger , Andre L. Carrel , Nicole Sintov
Perceptions that Electric Vehicles (EVs) hold symbolic value— expressing the owners' identity, values, and status—are positively associated with willingness to purchase an EV. However, is this relationship between symbolic value and purchase intent fixed over time or does it change as the purchase decision draws nearer? In two cross-sectional survey studies, we assess whether and how purchase timing moderates the association between EV symbolic value and adoption intent. Study 1 (N = 565; Columbus, Ohio) finds symbolic value is more closely related to EV adoption intent when a purchase decision is near in time. Study 2 (N = 709; Los Angeles, California) replicates these findings and yields evidence of symbolic value as a mechanism. Specifically, the association between EV symbolic value and identity is stronger among individuals nearer to a purchase decision. This identity-enhanced symbolism, in turn, is positively associated with EV adoption intent. Though our samples were relatively small to detect moderation, this work provides initial evidence that the relationship between symbolic value and adoption intent is stronger when individuals are near (vs. distant) in time to a vehicle purchase decision. We employ two psychological theories, Identity-Based Motivation Theory and Construal Level Theory, to interpret our findings and suggest that an identity-based motivational pull toward products may be partly explained by enhanced symbolic value as one nears a product purchase.
{"title":"When does symbolism matter most? Exploring electric vehicle adoption intent through surveys in two United States cities","authors":"Atar Herziger , Andre L. Carrel , Nicole Sintov","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103818","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103818","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Perceptions that Electric Vehicles (EVs) hold symbolic value— expressing the owners' identity, values, and status—are positively associated with willingness to purchase an EV. However, is this relationship between symbolic value and purchase intent fixed over time or does it change as the purchase decision draws nearer? In two cross-sectional survey studies, we assess whether and how purchase timing moderates the association between EV symbolic value and adoption intent. Study 1 (N = 565; Columbus, Ohio) finds symbolic value is more closely related to EV adoption intent when a purchase decision is near in time. Study 2 (N = 709; Los Angeles, California) replicates these findings and yields evidence of symbolic value as a mechanism. Specifically, the association between EV symbolic value and identity is stronger among individuals nearer to a purchase decision. This identity-enhanced symbolism, in turn, is positively associated with EV adoption intent. Though our samples were relatively small to detect moderation, this work provides initial evidence that the relationship between symbolic value and adoption intent is stronger when individuals are near (vs. distant) in time to a vehicle purchase decision. We employ two psychological theories, Identity-Based Motivation Theory and Construal Level Theory, to interpret our findings and suggest that an identity-based motivational pull toward products may be partly explained by enhanced symbolic value as one nears a product purchase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103818"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142697495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}