首页 > 最新文献

Energy Research & Social Science最新文献

英文 中文
From thermal stress to health risk: Energy and housing injustice in Hong Kong's subdivided homes 从热压力到健康风险:香港细分住宅的能源和住房不公平
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104567
Laurence L. Delina , Kim Cochon , Johanne Rei R. Castro , Chloe Chan
Energy insecurity poses a critical threat to the well-being of Hong Kong households, particularly those residing in subdivided units—small spaces created by partitioning larger apartments—especially during periods of extreme weather. This mixed-methods study integrates survey and interview data to examine how energy insecurity and housing precarity intersect and influence self-reported health outcomes. Using an energy justice framework, the analysis highlights persistent energy injustices in Hong Kong. Most respondents reported heavy reliance on air conditioning, resulting in significant cost burdens, while over half experienced mould growth during the wet season; consequently, about one-third reported at least occasional physical health impacts. Ventilation deficiency, including unusable windows and dependence on appliance-based systems, emerged as a strong predictor of ill health. Overall, intensive coping strategies during temperature extremes, coupled with inadequate housing quality, exacerbate domestic thermal stress and health vulnerability. Institutional barriers further compound these injustices, such as landlord-controlled metering, subsidy schemes that exclude renters, and complex application procedures. Although subsidies and respite shelters exist, awareness remains limited. Accordingly, we recommend policy reforms grounded in energy justice principles, including recipient-centred subsidies, metering regulation, and integrated housing and public health interventions.
能源不安全对香港家庭的福祉构成了严重威胁,特别是那些居住在细分单元的家庭,特别是在极端天气期间。细分单元是指将较大的公寓分隔成的小空间。这项混合方法研究整合了调查和访谈数据,以研究能源不安全和住房不稳定如何交叉并影响自我报告的健康结果。该分析采用能源公正的框架,突显香港持续存在的能源不公正现象。大多数受访者表示严重依赖空调,造成了巨大的成本负担,而超过一半的人在雨季经历了霉菌生长;因此,大约三分之一的人报告说,至少偶尔会对身体健康产生影响。通风不足,包括无法使用的窗户和依赖电器系统,成为健康状况不佳的有力预测因素。总体而言,极端温度期间的强化应对策略,加上住房质量不足,加剧了家庭热应激和健康脆弱性。制度障碍进一步加剧了这些不公正,例如房东控制的计量、排除租房者的补贴计划以及复杂的申请程序。虽然有补贴和临时庇护所,但认识仍然有限。因此,我们建议以能源公正原则为基础进行政策改革,包括以接受者为中心的补贴、计量监管以及综合住房和公共卫生干预措施。
{"title":"From thermal stress to health risk: Energy and housing injustice in Hong Kong's subdivided homes","authors":"Laurence L. Delina ,&nbsp;Kim Cochon ,&nbsp;Johanne Rei R. Castro ,&nbsp;Chloe Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104567","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104567","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy insecurity poses a critical threat to the well-being of Hong Kong households, particularly those residing in subdivided units—small spaces created by partitioning larger apartments—especially during periods of extreme weather. This mixed-methods study integrates survey and interview data to examine how energy insecurity and housing precarity intersect and influence self-reported health outcomes. Using an energy justice framework, the analysis highlights persistent energy injustices in Hong Kong. Most respondents reported heavy reliance on air conditioning, resulting in significant cost burdens, while over half experienced mould growth during the wet season; consequently, about one-third reported at least occasional physical health impacts. Ventilation deficiency, including unusable windows and dependence on appliance-based systems, emerged as a strong predictor of ill health. Overall, intensive coping strategies during temperature extremes, coupled with inadequate housing quality, exacerbate domestic thermal stress and health vulnerability. Institutional barriers further compound these injustices, such as landlord-controlled metering, subsidy schemes that exclude renters, and complex application procedures. Although subsidies and respite shelters exist, awareness remains limited. Accordingly, we recommend policy reforms grounded in energy justice principles, including recipient-centred subsidies, metering regulation, and integrated housing and public health interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104567"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146079442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geospatial electrification pathways for Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of planning tools, implementation strategies, and socio-economic impacts 撒哈拉以南非洲的地理空间电气化路径:规划工具、实施战略和社会经济影响的系统审查
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104540
Joseph M. Ntayi , Slyvia Manjeri Aarakit , Herbert Murungi , Kenneth Byangwa , Gideon Nkurunziza , Josephine Nassali
In recent decades, geospatial modeling has played an increasingly central role in how electricity is planned and delivered in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This systematic review synthesizes findings from 57 peer-reviewed studies and institutional reports published between 2010 and early 2024. It evaluates the use of spatial tools, electrification strategies, and the social impacts of energy planning. The review adopts the PRISMA and SALSA frameworks to analyze the types of modeling tools applied, including OnSSET, HOMER Pro, and PyPSA-Earth, and their effectiveness in generating least-cost electrification pathways. Findings highlight that hybrid approaches that combine grid, mini-grid, and off-grid systems are generally the most cost-effective. The geospatial strategies demonstrate measurable impacts on education, health, income, and gender equity, although gender metrics remain underreported. Persistent spatial inequalities especially in rural and marginalized areas are exacerbated by policy gaps, weak data governance, and institutional fragmentation. This paper emphasizes that the success of geospatial electrification tools depends not only on technical innovation but also on governance reforms and a deliberate focus on spatial justice. It offers practical insights for policymakers, researchers, and development partners to ensure electricity planning in SSA is inclusive, data-driven, and development-oriented.
近几十年来,地理空间建模在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)的电力规划和输送中发挥着越来越重要的作用。该系统综述综合了2010年至2024年初发表的57项同行评议研究和机构报告的发现。它评估了空间工具的使用、电气化策略和能源规划的社会影响。该综述采用PRISMA和SALSA框架来分析所应用的建模工具类型,包括OnSSET、HOMER Pro和PyPSA-Earth,以及它们在生成成本最低的电气化路径方面的有效性。研究结果强调,结合电网、微型电网和离网系统的混合方法通常是最具成本效益的。地理空间战略对教育、卫生、收入和性别平等产生了可衡量的影响,尽管性别指标仍未得到充分报告。政策差距、薄弱的数据治理和制度碎片化加剧了持续存在的空间不平等,特别是在农村和边缘地区。本文强调,地理空间电气化工具的成功不仅取决于技术创新,还取决于治理改革和对空间正义的刻意关注。它为政策制定者、研究人员和发展合作伙伴提供了实用的见解,以确保SSA的电力规划具有包容性、数据驱动和以发展为导向。
{"title":"Geospatial electrification pathways for Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of planning tools, implementation strategies, and socio-economic impacts","authors":"Joseph M. Ntayi ,&nbsp;Slyvia Manjeri Aarakit ,&nbsp;Herbert Murungi ,&nbsp;Kenneth Byangwa ,&nbsp;Gideon Nkurunziza ,&nbsp;Josephine Nassali","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104540","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104540","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent decades, geospatial modeling has played an increasingly central role in how electricity is planned and delivered in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This systematic review synthesizes findings from 57 peer-reviewed studies and institutional reports published between 2010 and early 2024. It evaluates the use of spatial tools, electrification strategies, and the social impacts of energy planning. The review adopts the PRISMA and SALSA frameworks to analyze the types of modeling tools applied, including OnSSET, HOMER Pro, and PyPSA-Earth, and their effectiveness in generating least-cost electrification pathways. Findings highlight that hybrid approaches that combine grid, mini-grid, and off-grid systems are generally the most cost-effective. The geospatial strategies demonstrate measurable impacts on education, health, income, and gender equity, although gender metrics remain underreported. Persistent spatial inequalities especially in rural and marginalized areas are exacerbated by policy gaps, weak data governance, and institutional fragmentation. This paper emphasizes that the success of geospatial electrification tools depends not only on technical innovation but also on governance reforms and a deliberate focus on spatial justice. It offers practical insights for policymakers, researchers, and development partners to ensure electricity planning in SSA is inclusive, data-driven, and development-oriented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104540"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146079441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When wind power is rejected: Sámi self-determination and restorative energy justice in Arctic Norway 当风力发电被拒绝:Sámi自决和恢复能源正义在北极挪威
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104569
Larry Ibrahim Mohammed
Energy justice theory offers a framework for guiding a fair green transition; however, when applied in decision-making, its principles can conflict, particularly in multicultural societies with diverse values. This paper examines such tensions in Arctic Norway by analysing the justifications provided by energy authorities for rejecting three wind power projects due to potential impacts on Indigenous livelihoods. It also explores the role of Indigenous self-determination arrangements in the wind power process. Drawing on qualitative analyses of wind power application documents, correspondence, consultation minutes, site visits, initial licensing decisions, and appeal outcomes, the study presents three key findings. Firstly, cumulative impacts on reindeer husbandry are central to permit rejections in reindeer herding areas, despite a lack of consensus on how to assess them. Secondly, licensing decisions made on appeal explicitly engage with international legal sources for Indigenous rights and consider the unique situations of reindeer herders. In contrast, initial licensing decisions tend to be influenced by national energy goals, often relying on mitigation measures as a panacea for coexistence between reindeer and wind power. Thirdly, Indigenous actors lack the certainty of actual influence over licensing outcomes despite formal participation mechanisms. The paper argues for the foregrounding of a restorative justice approach within energy justice theory to mediate tensions between what is deemed beneficial for the public and what is just for Indigenous peoples. It concludes with a proposal for a proactive form of Indigenous self-determination to ensure the incorporation of Indigenous perspectives in energy decision-making processes.
能源正义理论为指导公平的绿色转型提供了框架;然而,当应用于决策时,其原则可能会发生冲突,特别是在具有不同价值观的多元文化社会中。本文通过分析能源当局拒绝三个风力发电项目的理由,分析了挪威北极地区的这种紧张局势,因为这些项目可能对土著居民的生计产生影响。它还探讨了土著自决安排在风力发电过程中的作用。通过对风力发电申请文件、信函、咨询记录、实地考察、初始许可决定和上诉结果的定性分析,该研究提出了三个主要发现。首先,对驯鹿养殖的累积影响是允许在驯鹿放牧地区拒绝的核心,尽管在如何评估这些影响方面缺乏共识。其次,在上诉中作出的许可决定明确涉及土著权利的国际法律来源,并考虑到驯鹿牧民的独特情况。相比之下,最初的许可决定往往受到国家能源目标的影响,往往依靠缓解措施作为驯鹿和风能共存的灵丹妙药。第三,尽管有正式的参与机制,土著行为体对许可结果缺乏实际影响的确定性。本文主张在能源正义理论中引入恢复性司法方法,以调解对公众有益和对土著人民公正之间的紧张关系。报告最后建议采取积极主动的土著自决形式,以确保在能源决策过程中纳入土著的观点。
{"title":"When wind power is rejected: Sámi self-determination and restorative energy justice in Arctic Norway","authors":"Larry Ibrahim Mohammed","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104569","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104569","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy justice theory offers a framework for guiding a fair green transition; however, when applied in decision-making, its principles can conflict, particularly in multicultural societies with diverse values. This paper examines such tensions in Arctic Norway by analysing the justifications provided by energy authorities for rejecting three wind power projects due to potential impacts on Indigenous livelihoods. It also explores the role of Indigenous self-determination arrangements in the wind power process. Drawing on qualitative analyses of wind power application documents, correspondence, consultation minutes, site visits, initial licensing decisions, and appeal outcomes, the study presents three key findings. Firstly, cumulative impacts on reindeer husbandry are central to permit rejections in reindeer herding areas, despite a lack of consensus on how to assess them. Secondly, licensing decisions made on appeal explicitly engage with international legal sources for Indigenous rights and consider the unique situations of reindeer herders. In contrast, initial licensing decisions tend to be influenced by national energy goals, often relying on mitigation measures as a panacea for coexistence between reindeer and wind power. Thirdly, Indigenous actors lack the certainty of actual influence over licensing outcomes despite formal participation mechanisms. The paper argues for the foregrounding of a restorative justice approach within energy justice theory to mediate tensions between what is deemed beneficial for the public and what is just for Indigenous peoples. It concludes with a proposal for a proactive form of Indigenous self-determination to ensure the incorporation of Indigenous perspectives in energy decision-making processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104569"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146079436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proposing a value-sharing mechanism for wind power: Impacts of benefit-sharing and community engagement on acceptance and environmental awareness 提出风电的价值分享机制:利益分享和社区参与对接受度和环境意识的影响
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104537
Kyungmin Lee , Sun-Jin Yun , Ji Yong Myeong
As governments increasingly promote installing wind power plants, conflicts with residents have emerged. Some wind farm villages implement financial benefit-sharing schemes and organize public hearings, yet empirical evidence on the effectiveness of such mechanisms remains limited. This study examines whether financial benefit-sharing and community participation are associated with residents' acceptance of wind turbines and with environmental awareness. We propose a Value-sharing Mechanism (VSM) framework by comparing villages with different benefit-sharing types and participation levels. A survey of 95 residents from three wind farm villages in Jeju Island, South Korea, classified as utility-focused, benefit-focused, and participation-focused models, was conducted. The Kruskal-Wallis test, correlation analysis, and linear regression were employed to assess the relationships among perception of benefit-sharing, community engagement, local acceptance, and environmental awareness. Results indicate that both benefit-sharing and community engagement are positively associated with local acceptance, but not with environmental awareness. These findings inform theoretical insights through the lens of commons theory and may inform practice for designing self-governing sustainable renewable energy projects under the VSM framework.
随着政府越来越多地推动安装风力发电厂,与居民的冲突也出现了。一些风电场村庄实施了经济利益分享计划,并组织了公开听证会,然而,关于这种机制有效性的经验证据仍然有限。本研究考察了经济利益分享和社区参与是否与居民对风力涡轮机的接受程度和环境意识有关。通过对不同利益共享类型和参与水平的村庄进行比较,提出了一个价值共享机制框架。对韩国济州岛三个风电场村的95名居民进行了调查,分为以效用为中心、以利益为中心和以参与为中心的模式。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、相关分析和线性回归评估了利益分享感知、社区参与、地方接受度和环境意识之间的关系。结果表明,利益分享和社区参与都与当地的接受程度呈正相关,但与环境意识无关。这些发现通过公地理论的视角提供了理论见解,并可能为在VSM框架下设计自治的可持续可再生能源项目提供实践信息。
{"title":"Proposing a value-sharing mechanism for wind power: Impacts of benefit-sharing and community engagement on acceptance and environmental awareness","authors":"Kyungmin Lee ,&nbsp;Sun-Jin Yun ,&nbsp;Ji Yong Myeong","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104537","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104537","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As governments increasingly promote installing wind power plants, conflicts with residents have emerged. Some wind farm villages implement financial benefit-sharing schemes and organize public hearings, yet empirical evidence on the effectiveness of such mechanisms remains limited. This study examines whether financial benefit-sharing and community participation are associated with residents' acceptance of wind turbines and with environmental awareness. We propose a Value-sharing Mechanism (VSM) framework by comparing villages with different benefit-sharing types and participation levels. A survey of 95 residents from three wind farm villages in Jeju Island, South Korea, classified as utility-focused, benefit-focused, and participation-focused models, was conducted. The Kruskal-Wallis test, correlation analysis, and linear regression were employed to assess the relationships among perception of benefit-sharing, community engagement, local acceptance, and environmental awareness. Results indicate that both benefit-sharing and community engagement are positively associated with local acceptance, but not with environmental awareness. These findings inform theoretical insights through the lens of commons theory and may inform practice for designing self-governing sustainable renewable energy projects under the VSM framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104537"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Small (and not-so-small) villages in the Amazon: The challenge of access to electricity infrastructure 亚马逊地区的小村庄(不那么小):获得电力基础设施的挑战
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104550
Antonio C.P. Brasil Junior , Rafael C.F. Mendes , José Lavaquial
This article analyzes electrification in small Amazonian villages, focusing on settlements of 1000–5000 inhabitants that face persistent deficits in basic services despite growing socio-economic complexity. To interpret this transitional condition, it introduces the concept of embryonic urbanity, which captures how emerging urban nuclei formulate collective demands for infrastructure, territorial inclusion, and environmental sustainability. Within this framework, electrification is shown to be a key driver of early urban consolidation and social development. The study then assesses renewable hybrid energy systems as alternatives to diesel-based generation in isolated grids. Simulation results using the platform HOMER-Pro indicate that hybridization could reduce annual diesel consumption by about 140.5 million liters, equivalent to 376.6 ktCO2e. These findings highlight hybrid systems as a strategic pathway for integrating universal access with decarbonization and resilient territorial development in the Amazon.
本文分析了亚马逊小村庄的电气化情况,重点关注1000-5000居民的定居点,尽管社会经济日益复杂,但这些定居点仍面临基本服务的持续不足。为了解释这一过渡条件,本文引入了城市萌芽性的概念,该概念捕捉了新兴城市核心如何形成对基础设施、领土包容和环境可持续性的集体需求。在这一框架内,电气化被证明是早期城市整合和社会发展的关键驱动力。该研究随后评估了可再生混合能源系统作为孤立电网中柴油发电的替代品。使用HOMER-Pro平台的仿真结果表明,混合动力可以减少每年约1.405亿升的柴油消耗,相当于376.6万吨二氧化碳当量。这些发现强调了混合系统是将亚马逊地区的普遍获取与脱碳和弹性领土发展相结合的战略途径。
{"title":"Small (and not-so-small) villages in the Amazon: The challenge of access to electricity infrastructure","authors":"Antonio C.P. Brasil Junior ,&nbsp;Rafael C.F. Mendes ,&nbsp;José Lavaquial","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104550","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104550","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article analyzes electrification in small Amazonian villages, focusing on settlements of 1000–5000 inhabitants that face persistent deficits in basic services despite growing socio-economic complexity. To interpret this transitional condition, it introduces the concept of <em>embryonic urbanity</em>, which captures how emerging urban nuclei formulate collective demands for infrastructure, territorial inclusion, and environmental sustainability. Within this framework, electrification is shown to be a key driver of early urban consolidation and social development. The study then assesses renewable hybrid energy systems as alternatives to diesel-based generation in isolated grids. Simulation results using the platform HOMER-Pro indicate that hybridization could reduce annual diesel consumption by about 140.5 million liters, equivalent to 376.6 ktCO2e. These findings highlight hybrid systems as a strategic pathway for integrating universal access with decarbonization and resilient territorial development in the Amazon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104550"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public perceptions under the spotlight: The role of public communication in shaping acceptance and resistance towards nuclear energy and battery manufacturing in Hungary 聚光灯下的公众看法:公众沟通在匈牙利对核能和电池制造的接受和抵制中所起的作用
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104531
Mónika Rajcsányi-Molnár , István András , Márta Konczos Szombathelyi
The scope of the paper is the examination, comparison and analysis of the public perception of the nuclear energy and battery manufacturing sectors in Hungary with a focus on the role of public communication in the effectiveness of public acceptance. The study uses focus group discussions conducted in three cities in Hungary and analyses their results using thematic analysis. The study investigates the levels of knowledge of the respondents regarding the subject, their perceptions of sectoral benefits and risks, trust in various stakeholders, and the effect of public communication. These are revealed in eight coding frames, which provide a detailed map to the data on each research subtopic (dimensions, categories, subcategories, definitions, occurrence), while representative examples are provided in the Results. The study reveals complex knowledge levels on both investigated sectors, with nuclear energy seen as providing for energy safety and being good for the environment, whereas battery manufacturing was associated with economic profit and environmental pollution. Trust in the government and industry, as well as the credibility of the scientific community significantly differed between the two sectors. We can conclude that media communication and corporate public communication play a critical role in perception. Furthermore, to gain confidence in battery manufacturing, targeted sensitive sector frameworks should be used to address concerns and to emphasize benefits to the public.
本文的范围是审查,比较和分析匈牙利公众对核能和电池制造部门的看法,重点是公众沟通在公众接受有效性中的作用。该研究采用了在匈牙利三个城市进行的焦点小组讨论,并使用主题分析分析了他们的结果。该研究调查了受访者对该主题的知识水平,他们对部门利益和风险的看法,对各种利益相关者的信任以及公众沟通的效果。这些都显示在8个编码框架中,这些编码框架提供了每个研究子主题(维度、类别、子类别、定义、发生)数据的详细地图,而结果中提供了代表性示例。该研究揭示了两个被调查部门的复杂知识水平,核能被视为提供能源安全和对环境有益,而电池制造则与经济利润和环境污染有关。在这两个部门之间,对政府和工业界的信任以及科学界的可信度存在显著差异。我们可以得出结论,媒体传播和企业公众传播在感知中起着至关重要的作用。此外,为了获得对电池制造业的信心,应该使用有针对性的敏感行业框架来解决问题,并强调对公众的好处。
{"title":"Public perceptions under the spotlight: The role of public communication in shaping acceptance and resistance towards nuclear energy and battery manufacturing in Hungary","authors":"Mónika Rajcsányi-Molnár ,&nbsp;István András ,&nbsp;Márta Konczos Szombathelyi","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104531","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104531","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The scope of the paper is the examination, comparison and analysis of the public perception of the nuclear energy and battery manufacturing sectors in Hungary with a focus on the role of public communication in the effectiveness of public acceptance. The study uses focus group discussions conducted in three cities in Hungary and analyses their results using thematic analysis. The study investigates the levels of knowledge of the respondents regarding the subject, their perceptions of sectoral benefits and risks, trust in various stakeholders, and the effect of public communication. These are revealed in eight coding frames, which provide a detailed map to the data on each research subtopic (dimensions, categories, subcategories, definitions, occurrence), while representative examples are provided in the Results. The study reveals complex knowledge levels on both investigated sectors, with nuclear energy seen as providing for energy safety and being good for the environment, whereas battery manufacturing was associated with economic profit and environmental pollution. Trust in the government and industry, as well as the credibility of the scientific community significantly differed between the two sectors. We can conclude that media communication and corporate public communication play a critical role in perception. Furthermore, to gain confidence in battery manufacturing, targeted sensitive sector frameworks should be used to address concerns and to emphasize benefits to the public.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104531"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From waste to fuel: Uncovering the drivers of garbage and plastic burning in Northwest Nigeria 从废物到燃料:揭露尼日利亚西北部垃圾和塑料燃烧的驱动因素
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104547
Bishal Bharadwaj , Tara Gates , Srijani Deb , Ian Gates
Anecdotal evidence indicates that energy-poor households in regions lacking formal waste management systems often resort to burning garbage, including plastic, to fulfill their energy requirements and manage waste. The Multi-Tier Framework (MTF) dataset from Northwest Nigeria was used to examine the prevalence of garbage and plastic burning, along with the underlying reasons and methods households employ for this practice. Analyzing data from 3669 households, findings show that up to 58% of households in certain local government areas (LGAs) burn garbage including plastic as fuel. Factors driving this behaviour extend beyond economic constraints, notably increased plastic waste, inadequate waste management infrastructure, and declining availability of traditional fuels. In some instances, external influences significantly motivate the use of polluting fuels. This localized investigation underscores the emerging challenge of plastic burning in impoverished communities in the Global South, where rising plastic pollution, diminishing biomass resources, and the absence of formal waste services converge, exacerbating health and environmental risks.
轶事证据表明,在缺乏正式废物管理系统的地区,能源贫乏的家庭往往通过燃烧垃圾,包括塑料,来满足其能源需求和管理废物。来自尼日利亚西北部的多层框架(MTF)数据集用于检查垃圾和塑料燃烧的普遍性,以及家庭采用这种做法的根本原因和方法。分析了3669户家庭的数据,结果显示,在某些地方政府辖区(lga),高达58%的家庭燃烧垃圾,包括塑料作为燃料。推动这种行为的因素超出了经济限制,特别是塑料废物增加、废物管理基础设施不足以及传统燃料的可用性下降。在某些情况下,外部影响极大地促使使用污染燃料。这一局部调查凸显了全球南方贫困社区塑料燃烧的新挑战,在那里,塑料污染加剧,生物质资源减少,缺乏正式的废物处理服务,加剧了健康和环境风险。
{"title":"From waste to fuel: Uncovering the drivers of garbage and plastic burning in Northwest Nigeria","authors":"Bishal Bharadwaj ,&nbsp;Tara Gates ,&nbsp;Srijani Deb ,&nbsp;Ian Gates","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104547","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104547","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anecdotal evidence indicates that energy-poor households in regions lacking formal waste management systems often resort to burning garbage, including plastic, to fulfill their energy requirements and manage waste. The Multi-Tier Framework (MTF) dataset from Northwest Nigeria was used to examine the prevalence of garbage and plastic burning, along with the underlying reasons and methods households employ for this practice. Analyzing data from 3669 households, findings show that up to 58% of households in certain local government areas (LGAs) burn garbage including plastic as fuel. Factors driving this behaviour extend beyond economic constraints, notably increased plastic waste, inadequate waste management infrastructure, and declining availability of traditional fuels. In some instances, external influences significantly motivate the use of polluting fuels. This localized investigation underscores the emerging challenge of plastic burning in impoverished communities in the Global South, where rising plastic pollution, diminishing biomass resources, and the absence of formal waste services converge, exacerbating health and environmental risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104547"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Racing against the clock: Modeling the global transition to renewable energy technologies 与时间赛跑:模拟全球向可再生能源技术的过渡
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104541
Alessandro Bessi , Mariangela Guidolin , Piero Manfredi
Thirty years after the first UN conference of parties on global climate change (COP1), the global energy sector remains reliant on fossil fuels, with low- to zero-emission power sources struggling to take the lead in most national markets. Despite the sustained growth of solar and wind energy technologies (SWET) being confirmed in 2023, carbon emissions and climate constraints continue to rise, suggesting that a pathway toward net-zero emissions remains complex. Our analysis uses innovation diffusion models to offer an up-to-date perspective of the current co-evolution of SWET against its main fossil competitors, namely coal and natural gas energy technologies (CGET), across the 75 largest energy-consuming countries. Our model-based evidence suggests that the energy transition struggles in crowding-out traditional fossil fuels and therefore is hardly identifiable as a worldwide trend. Important achievements remain highly localized to only a few regions worldwide suggesting an uneven process, with still many barriers and needing public support as well as international cooperation. Model-based forward projections suggest that most countries will likely achieve the SWET-to-CGET parity well beyond the energy milestone of 2030. Current war scenarios, local crises and the declarations (as well as actions) of the new US administration about US energy policy, bring substantial uncertainty on the global perspectives.
在联合国第一次全球气候变化缔约方会议(COP1)召开30年后,全球能源部门仍然依赖化石燃料,低排放或零排放的能源难以在大多数国家市场占据主导地位。尽管2023年太阳能和风能技术(swt)将持续增长,但碳排放和气候限制将继续增加,这表明实现净零排放的道路仍然很复杂。我们的分析使用创新扩散模型,提供了在75个最大的能源消费国中,当前与主要化石燃料竞争对手(即煤炭和天然气能源技术(CGET))共同演变的最新视角。我们基于模型的证据表明,能源转型正在努力挤出传统的化石燃料,因此很难确定这是一种全球趋势。重要的成就仍然高度局限于全球少数地区,这表明进程不平衡,仍然存在许多障碍,需要公众支持和国际合作。基于模型的前瞻性预测表明,大多数国家可能会在2030年能源里程碑之后实现sweet -to- cget平价。当前的战争形势、局部危机以及美国新政府关于美国能源政策的声明(以及行动),给全球前景带来了巨大的不确定性。
{"title":"Racing against the clock: Modeling the global transition to renewable energy technologies","authors":"Alessandro Bessi ,&nbsp;Mariangela Guidolin ,&nbsp;Piero Manfredi","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104541","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104541","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thirty years after the first UN conference of parties on global climate change (COP1), the global energy sector remains reliant on fossil fuels, with low- to zero-emission power sources struggling to take the lead in most national markets. Despite the sustained growth of solar and wind energy technologies (SWET) being confirmed in 2023, carbon emissions and climate constraints continue to rise, suggesting that a pathway toward net-zero emissions remains complex. Our analysis uses innovation diffusion models to offer an up-to-date perspective of the current co-evolution of SWET against its main fossil competitors, namely coal and natural gas energy technologies (CGET), across the 75 largest energy-consuming countries. Our model-based evidence suggests that the energy transition struggles in crowding-out traditional fossil fuels and therefore is hardly identifiable as a worldwide trend. Important achievements remain highly localized to only a few regions worldwide suggesting an uneven process, with still many barriers and needing public support as well as international cooperation. Model-based forward projections suggest that most countries will likely achieve the SWET-to-CGET parity well beyond the energy milestone of 2030. Current war scenarios, local crises and the declarations (as well as actions) of the new US administration about US energy policy, bring substantial uncertainty on the global perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104541"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Settler colonialism lock-in: Transitions and the prefiguring of settler futurities 定居者殖民主义锁定:过渡和定居者未来的预示
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104515
Suzanne Chew , Tracey Galloway
Transitions research commonly assumes the dominant Western paradigm of modern ontology and its ideological colonial and capitalist relations. Yet these assumptions, left uninterrogated, endanger the emancipatory and liberatory potential heralded by new energy futures within just transitions, eliding decolonial futurities that honour tenets of Indigenous resurgence as well as truth and reconciliation. In colonized places where the invaders never left, these onto-ideological assumptions risk perpetuating settler colonialism and its manifest harms, reproducing the status quo of social inequity and hegemonic power relations. Learning from the concepts by Seto et al. (2016) of ‘carbon lock-in’ and Byrd's (2011) ‘transit of empire’, we aim to further illuminate such risks by characterizing this path dependency as settler colonialism lock-in. Here, settler colonialism lock-in refers to the entrenchment of an enmeshed modern ontology, contemporary capitalism, and colonialism within the institutional, political, social, and infrastructural (legal, financial, physical) fabric of transitions, by default prefiguring and prioritizing settler futurities. Centering equity and justice necessitates reflection upon the crux of the question: whose priorities, and whose futurities, do transitions centre? Through such reflection, we call upon researchers and practitioners working on transitions to consider different worlds and learn from Indigenous thought, and in resisting neoliberal worlds, to reimagine who can and should profit from transitions. The idea of settler colonialism lock-in aims to provoke thought and reflection in discerning such path dependency to avoid these slippery paths, towards building just transitions.
转型研究通常假设西方主导的现代本体论范式及其意识形态的殖民和资本主义关系。然而,这些假设,如果不加以质疑,就会危及新能源未来在转型过程中预示的解放和解放潜力,从而忽略了尊重土著复兴以及真理与和解原则的非殖民化未来。在侵略者从未离开过的被殖民地区,这些基于意识形态的假设有可能使定居者殖民主义及其明显的危害永久化,再现社会不平等和霸权关系的现状。从Seto等人(2016)的“碳锁定”和Byrd(2011)的“帝国过境”概念中学习,我们的目标是通过将这种路径依赖描述为定居者殖民主义锁定来进一步阐明这些风险。在这里,定居者殖民主义锁定指的是在过渡的制度、政治、社会和基础设施(法律、金融、物理)结构中,一个纠缠在一起的现代本体论、当代资本主义和殖民主义的堑壕,默认地预示和优先考虑定居者的未来。以公平和正义为中心,就必须反思问题的关键:转型以谁的优先事项和谁的未来为中心?通过这样的反思,我们呼吁致力于转型的研究人员和实践者考虑不同的世界,并从土著思想中学习,并在抵制新自由主义世界的过程中,重新想象谁能够并且应该从转型中受益。定居者殖民主义锁定的想法旨在激发人们对这种路径依赖的思考和反思,以避免这些滑溜的道路,朝着建设公正的过渡。
{"title":"Settler colonialism lock-in: Transitions and the prefiguring of settler futurities","authors":"Suzanne Chew ,&nbsp;Tracey Galloway","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104515","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104515","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transitions research commonly assumes the dominant Western paradigm of modern ontology and its ideological colonial and capitalist relations. Yet these assumptions, left uninterrogated, endanger the emancipatory and liberatory potential heralded by new energy futures within just transitions, eliding decolonial futurities that honour tenets of Indigenous resurgence as well as truth and reconciliation. In colonized places where the invaders never left, these onto-ideological assumptions risk perpetuating settler colonialism and its manifest harms, reproducing the status quo of social inequity and hegemonic power relations. Learning from the concepts by Seto et al. (2016) of ‘carbon lock-in’ and Byrd's (2011) ‘transit of empire’, we aim to further illuminate such risks by characterizing this path dependency as <em>settler colonialism lock-in</em>. Here, settler colonialism lock-in refers to the entrenchment of an enmeshed modern ontology, contemporary capitalism, and colonialism within the institutional, political, social, and infrastructural (legal, financial, physical) fabric of transitions, by default prefiguring and prioritizing settler futurities. Centering equity and justice necessitates reflection upon the crux of the question: <em>whose priorities</em>, and <em>whose futurities</em>, do transitions centre? Through such reflection, we call upon researchers and practitioners working on transitions to consider different worlds and learn from Indigenous thought, and in resisting neoliberal worlds, to reimagine who can and should profit from transitions. The idea of settler colonialism lock-in aims to provoke thought and reflection in discerning such path dependency to avoid these slippery paths, towards building just transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104515"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Who owns the transition narrative? BERTopic text mining of Polish press discourse on the energy transition (2015–2023) 谁拥有过渡叙事?波兰能源转型新闻话语BERTopic文本挖掘(2015-2023)
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104554
Piotr Cichocki, Mariusz Baranowski, Piotr Jabkowski
This study uses the Multi-Level Perspective to map the coverage of energy-transition issues in the Polish press from 2015 to 2023. Specifically, we examine how coverage is distributed across landscape, regime, and niche levels and how these distributions and topic salience vary among business, liberal, and right-wing press titles. We compiled 3152 articles that mentioned “energy transition” and used a transformer-based BERTopic pipeline to identify 50 topics. At the landscape level, our study revealed that the Polish press emphasized European Union climate regulations, macroeconomic conditions, and geopolitics in its coverage. At the regime level, coverage focused on coal controversies, energy infrastructure, prices and affordability, environmental, social, governance, finance, renewables, and small modular reactors. Niche content put emphasis on hydrogen and alternative fuels and highlighted the impact of digitalization and automation. Additionally, we found that business outlets overrepresented finance and markets, framing sustainability in commercial terms while downplaying partisan conflict and broad environmental policy. Liberal outlets prioritized domestic politics and social debates over technical or market dimensions. Right-wing outlets emphasized climate and the environment within national frames, highlighting hydrogen and infrastructure tied to security and independence while downplaying financial-market perspectives.
本研究采用多层次视角对波兰媒体2015年至2023年能源转型问题的报道进行了分析。具体来说,我们研究了报道是如何在景观、制度和利基层面上分布的,以及这些分布和主题的显著性在商业、自由派和右翼媒体标题之间是如何变化的。我们编译了3152篇提到“能源转换”的文章,并使用基于变压器的BERTopic管道确定了50个主题。在景观层面,我们的研究显示,波兰媒体在其报道中强调欧盟气候法规、宏观经济条件和地缘政治。在制度层面,报道集中在煤炭争议、能源基础设施、价格和可负担性、环境、社会、治理、金融、可再生能源和小型模块化反应堆。小众内容强调氢和替代燃料,并强调数字化和自动化的影响。此外,我们发现商业网点过度代表了金融和市场,在商业术语中构建了可持续性,同时淡化了党派冲突和广泛的环境政策。自由派媒体将国内政治和社会辩论置于技术或市场层面之上。右翼媒体在国家框架内强调气候和环境,强调与安全和独立相关的氢和基础设施,同时淡化金融市场的前景。
{"title":"Who owns the transition narrative? BERTopic text mining of Polish press discourse on the energy transition (2015–2023)","authors":"Piotr Cichocki,&nbsp;Mariusz Baranowski,&nbsp;Piotr Jabkowski","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104554","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104554","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study uses the Multi-Level Perspective to map the coverage of energy-transition issues in the Polish press from 2015 to 2023. Specifically, we examine how coverage is distributed across landscape, regime, and niche levels and how these distributions and topic salience vary among business, liberal, and right-wing press titles. We compiled 3152 articles that mentioned “energy transition” and used a transformer-based BERTopic pipeline to identify 50 topics. At the landscape level, our study revealed that the Polish press emphasized European Union climate regulations, macroeconomic conditions, and geopolitics in its coverage. At the regime level, coverage focused on coal controversies, energy infrastructure, prices and affordability, environmental, social, governance, finance, renewables, and small modular reactors. Niche content put emphasis on hydrogen and alternative fuels and highlighted the impact of digitalization and automation. Additionally, we found that business outlets overrepresented finance and markets, framing sustainability in commercial terms while downplaying partisan conflict and broad environmental policy. Liberal outlets prioritized domestic politics and social debates over technical or market dimensions. Right-wing outlets emphasized climate and the environment within national frames, highlighting hydrogen and infrastructure tied to security and independence while downplaying financial-market perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104554"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1