This paper maps the opposing rationales for reforming or not reforming the giant monopoly electricity provider in the world's fourth most populous country. Indonesia's state-owned power company, Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN), distributes electricity to 98 % of the country's households. Only 13 % of the company's power generation is from renewable sources, while 60 % is from coal-fired power plants. PLN is sometimes cast as the main obstacle to the energy transition in Indonesia, which has a more carbon-intensive electricity sector than both China and India. How PLN evolves is therefore important for global climate mitigation. Based on document analysis and rare interviews with the high-level policymakers who govern PLN, we find that keeping consumer prices low and maintaining security of supply are the utility's dominant concerns. Indirect costs, negative environmental externalities and alternative business opportunities in renewable energy are rarely taken into consideration. This is due to entrenched elite interests and what is referred to in the theoretical literature as ‘collective conservatism’. Three measures that could change PLN's approach to decarbonisation are: redirecting government financial support, introducing more stringent carbon pricing regulations and leveraging growing private business interest in renewable energy to change the framework within which PLN operates.
本文阐述了世界第四人口大国巨型垄断电力供应商改革与否的对立理由。印尼国有电力公司 Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) 为全国 98% 的家庭供电。该公司只有 13% 的发电量来自可再生能源,60% 的发电量来自燃煤发电厂。PLN 有时被认为是印尼能源转型的主要障碍,因为印尼的电力行业比中国和印度都更加碳密集。因此,PLN 如何发展对全球气候减缓非常重要。基于文件分析和与 PLN 高层决策者的罕见访谈,我们发现,保持低廉的消费价格和维护供应安全是该公司的主要关注点。间接成本、负面环境外部因素和可再生能源的替代商机很少被考虑在内。这是由于根深蒂固的精英利益和理论文献中所说的 "集体保守主义 "造成的。可以改变 PLN 去碳化方法的三项措施是:调整政府财政支持的方向、引入更严格的碳定价法规以及利用私营企业对可再生能源日益增长的兴趣来改变 PLN 的运营框架。
{"title":"To reform or not reform? Competing energy transition perspectives on Indonesia's monopoly electricity supplier Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN)","authors":"Indri Dwi Apriliyanti , Diwangkara Bagus Nugraha , Stein Kristiansen , Indra Overland","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103797","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103797","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper maps the opposing rationales for reforming or not reforming the giant monopoly electricity provider in the world's fourth most populous country. Indonesia's state-owned power company, Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN), distributes electricity to 98 % of the country's households. Only 13 % of the company's power generation is from renewable sources, while 60 % is from coal-fired power plants. PLN is sometimes cast as the main obstacle to the energy transition in Indonesia, which has a more carbon-intensive electricity sector than both China and India. How PLN evolves is therefore important for global climate mitigation. Based on document analysis and rare interviews with the high-level policymakers who govern PLN, we find that keeping consumer prices low and maintaining security of supply are the utility's dominant concerns. Indirect costs, negative environmental externalities and alternative business opportunities in renewable energy are rarely taken into consideration. This is due to entrenched elite interests and what is referred to in the theoretical literature as ‘collective conservatism’. Three measures that could change PLN's approach to decarbonisation are: redirecting government financial support, introducing more stringent carbon pricing regulations and leveraging growing private business interest in renewable energy to change the framework within which PLN operates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103797"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142530695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-17DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103800
Meiyu (Melrose) Pan, Wan Li, Chieh (Ross) Wang
Understanding the relationship between travel behavior and building energy use at an urban scale is crucial for developing effective energy management strategies. Mobility patterns significantly impact building occupancy, which in turn affects energy consumption. However, existing methods often focus on individual buildings, whereas geographical influences on energy usage are not adequately examined. This study addresses this gap by using transportation origin-destination (OD) data to estimate building occupancy and energy. The proposed method assigns OD trips from census block groups to the building level, incorporating building, travel survey, and census data to derive building occupancy profiles. This method was applied to urban and rural areas with 4062 buildings in 70 census block groups. We found that the OD-informed occupancy profile exhibits smoother energy consumption patterns compared with that of Department of Energy reference occupancy profiles. Our analysis reveals distinct building energy consumption patterns among groups with long and short commutes, emphasizing the effect of commute times and work schedules on residential energy usage. This framework is useful for practitioners in transportation agencies and utility companies, enabling the estimation of building energy based on mobility patterns. Overall, this study shows the potential of integrating transportation and building energy data to inform cross-sector energy management strategies.
在城市范围内,了解出行行为与建筑能耗之间的关系对于制定有效的能源管理战略至关重要。交通模式对建筑占用率有重大影响,而建筑占用率又反过来影响能源消耗。然而,现有方法通常只关注单个建筑,而对能源使用的地理影响却没有进行充分研究。本研究利用交通起点-终点(OD)数据来估算建筑物的占用率和能耗,从而弥补了这一不足。所提出的方法将人口普查区组的 OD 行程分配到建筑物层面,结合建筑物、旅行调查和人口普查数据,得出建筑物的占用情况。该方法适用于城市和农村地区的 70 个普查区组的 4062 栋建筑物。我们发现,与能源部参考的占用情况相比,以 OD 为依据的占用情况显示出更平滑的能源消耗模式。我们的分析揭示了通勤时间长和通勤时间短的群体之间截然不同的建筑能耗模式,强调了通勤时间和工作安排对住宅能耗的影响。这一框架对交通机构和公用事业公司的从业人员非常有用,可以根据流动模式估算建筑能耗。总之,这项研究显示了整合交通和建筑能源数据为跨部门能源管理战略提供信息的潜力。
{"title":"From roads to roofs: How urban and rural mobility influence building energy consumption","authors":"Meiyu (Melrose) Pan, Wan Li, Chieh (Ross) Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103800","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103800","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the relationship between travel behavior and building energy use at an urban scale is crucial for developing effective energy management strategies. Mobility patterns significantly impact building occupancy, which in turn affects energy consumption. However, existing methods often focus on individual buildings, whereas geographical influences on energy usage are not adequately examined. This study addresses this gap by using transportation origin-destination (OD) data to estimate building occupancy and energy. The proposed method assigns OD trips from census block groups to the building level, incorporating building, travel survey, and census data to derive building occupancy profiles. This method was applied to urban and rural areas with 4062 buildings in 70 census block groups. We found that the OD-informed occupancy profile exhibits smoother energy consumption patterns compared with that of Department of Energy reference occupancy profiles. Our analysis reveals distinct building energy consumption patterns among groups with long and short commutes, emphasizing the effect of commute times and work schedules on residential energy usage. This framework is useful for practitioners in transportation agencies and utility companies, enabling the estimation of building energy based on mobility patterns. Overall, this study shows the potential of integrating transportation and building energy data to inform cross-sector energy management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103800"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142446139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103791
Milan Tamis , Gerdien de Vries , Reint Jan Renes , Floor Alkemade
Residential public charging points are shared by multiple electric vehicle drivers, often neighbours. Therefore, charging behaviour is embedded in a social context. Behaviours that affect, or are influenced by, other public charging point users have been sparsely studied and lack an overarching and comprehensive definition. Consequently, very few measures are applied in practice to influence charging behaviour. We aim to classify and define the social dimension of charging behaviour from a social-psychological perspective and, using a behaviour change framework, identify and analyse the measures to influence this behaviour. We interviewed 15 experts on residential public charging infrastructure in the Netherlands. We identified 17 charging behaviours rooted in interpersonal interactions between individuals and interactions between individuals and technology. These behaviours can be categorised into prosocial and antisocial charging behaviours. Prosocial charging behaviour provides or enhances the opportunity for other users to charge their vehicle at the public charging point, for instance by charging only when necessary. Antisocial charging behaviour prevents or diminishes this opportunity, for instance by occupying the charging point after charging, intentionally or unintentionally. We then identified 23 measures to influence antisocial and prosocial charging behaviours. These measures can influence behaviour through human–technology interaction, such as providing charging etiquettes to new electric vehicle drivers or charging idle fees, and interpersonal interaction, such as social pressure from other charging point users or facilitating social interactions to exchange requests. Our approach advocates for more attention to the social dimension of charging behaviour.
{"title":"Plugging in with neighbours: Defining the social dimension of electric vehicle charging in the Netherlands","authors":"Milan Tamis , Gerdien de Vries , Reint Jan Renes , Floor Alkemade","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103791","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103791","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residential public charging points are shared by multiple electric vehicle drivers, often neighbours. Therefore, charging behaviour is embedded in a social context. Behaviours that affect, or are influenced by, other public charging point users have been sparsely studied and lack an overarching and comprehensive definition. Consequently, very few measures are applied in practice to influence charging behaviour. We aim to classify and define the social dimension of charging behaviour from a social-psychological perspective and, using a behaviour change framework, identify and analyse the measures to influence this behaviour. We interviewed 15 experts on residential public charging infrastructure in the Netherlands. We identified 17 charging behaviours rooted in interpersonal interactions between individuals and interactions between individuals and technology. These behaviours can be categorised into prosocial and antisocial charging behaviours. Prosocial charging behaviour provides or enhances the opportunity for other users to charge their vehicle at the public charging point, for instance by charging only when necessary. Antisocial charging behaviour prevents or diminishes this opportunity, for instance by occupying the charging point after charging, intentionally or unintentionally. We then identified 23 measures to influence antisocial and prosocial charging behaviours. These measures can influence behaviour through human–technology interaction, such as providing charging etiquettes to new electric vehicle drivers or charging idle fees, and interpersonal interaction, such as social pressure from other charging point users or facilitating social interactions to exchange requests. Our approach advocates for more attention to the social dimension of charging behaviour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103791"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142441844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103789
Marius Korsnes , Nicola Labanca , Inês Campos , Paolo Bertoldi
Energy prosumerism as a concept has gained attention in recent years. It has been embraced by policymakers, employed to study community energy movements globally and to denote novel directions in the energy system transition for more sustainable, decentralised, and potentially democratic production and consumption. Nevertheless, the concept has also been critiqued as individualistic with a strong techno-economic orientation. Initially coined by Toffler (1980), the concept combines the words ‘producer’ and ‘consumer’, assuming a return to production for own use. Through typologising prosumerism along three core dimensions—degree of technological engagement, ownership, and participation—we propose a framework for assessing the extent to which energy prosumerism is compatible with social organisation towards increased energy sufficiency and energy justice. Through a practical and holistic framework, the three dimensions identified will help policymakers and other stakeholders assess the extent to which new energy prosumer projects can simultaneously advance energy sufficiency and energy justice.
{"title":"How can energy prosumerism align with sufficiency and justice principles? A typology for policymakers, researchers and practitioners","authors":"Marius Korsnes , Nicola Labanca , Inês Campos , Paolo Bertoldi","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103789","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103789","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy prosumerism as a concept has gained attention in recent years. It has been embraced by policymakers, employed to study community energy movements globally and to denote novel directions in the energy system transition for more sustainable, decentralised, and potentially democratic production and consumption. Nevertheless, the concept has also been critiqued as individualistic with a strong techno-economic orientation. Initially coined by Toffler (1980), the concept combines the words ‘producer’ and ‘consumer’, assuming a return to production for own use. Through typologising prosumerism along three core dimensions—degree of technological engagement, ownership, and participation—we propose a framework for assessing the extent to which energy prosumerism is compatible with social organisation towards increased energy sufficiency and energy justice. Through a practical and holistic framework, the three dimensions identified will help policymakers and other stakeholders assess the extent to which new energy prosumer projects can simultaneously advance energy sufficiency and energy justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103789"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142441845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103788
Fiona Lambe, Carol Mungo, Mbeo Ogeya
Achieving universal access to electricity is central to the Agenda for Sustainable Development. However, over half a billion people in Sub-Saharan Africa are currently at risk of being left without electricity access by 2030. A rapid scale up of off-grid renewable electrification is needed to close the energy access gap, requiring innovation and new collaborations between private actors, the public sector, and service users. Several critical challenges to scaling access to mini-grids remain, most notably a lack of investment, and the uncertain regulatory environment in many sub-Saharan African countries. This study aimed to provide evidence about how external risks affect mini-grid business models and the strategies that developers apply to manage challenges. We compared two case studies of private sector-led mini-grids in Kenya interviewing a range of key stakeholders for each case. The data were analysed using a framework informed by business model innovation, frugal innovation, and the service design concept of value co-creation. We found that value co-creation is influenced by factors including political interference, regulatory uncertainty and customers' previous experiences with other energy services and their expectations of the new service. The strategies that developers use to address these challenges can have both positive and negative consequences for value co-creation. The ability to maintain focus on delivering a service that incorporates the core frugal aspects of reliability, affordability, simplicity and adaptability appears to be a key factor determining how well a firm navigates external pressures, influencing the overall viability of the business model.
{"title":"Grid expectations: How service design and business model innovation can support mini-grid development in Kenya","authors":"Fiona Lambe, Carol Mungo, Mbeo Ogeya","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103788","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103788","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving universal access to electricity is central to the Agenda for Sustainable Development. However, over half a billion people in Sub-Saharan Africa are currently at risk of being left without electricity access by 2030. A rapid scale up of off-grid renewable electrification is needed to close the energy access gap, requiring innovation and new collaborations between private actors, the public sector, and service users. Several critical challenges to scaling access to mini-grids remain, most notably a lack of investment, and the uncertain regulatory environment in many sub-Saharan African countries. This study aimed to provide evidence about how external risks affect mini-grid business models and the strategies that developers apply to manage challenges. We compared two case studies of private sector-led mini-grids in Kenya interviewing a range of key stakeholders for each case. The data were analysed using a framework informed by business model innovation, frugal innovation, and the service design concept of value co-creation. We found that value co-creation is influenced by factors including political interference, regulatory uncertainty and customers' previous experiences with other energy services and their expectations of the new service. The strategies that developers use to address these challenges can have both positive and negative consequences for value co-creation. The ability to maintain focus on delivering a service that incorporates the core frugal aspects of reliability, affordability, simplicity and adaptability appears to be a key factor determining how well a firm navigates external pressures, influencing the overall viability of the business model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103788"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142441846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103781
Alison Bates , Ogechi Vivian Nwadiaru , Anna Goldstein , Julia Cantor , Makaylah Cowan , Marina Pineda Shokooh , Krista Harper
The transition of the energy system to renewables can lead to inequities. Under-resourced and marginalized community members are vulnerable to disproportionate burdens of the energy system, particularly in post-industrial cities also grappling with social pressures associated with disinvestment and deindustrialization, climate change threats, and pressures of urban renewal. In this study, we use expert elicitation, ethnographic participant observation, and community focus groups to examine issues and conceptualizations of energy justice in a minority-majority post-industrial city undergoing rapid energy transformation alongside gentrification and other changing community dynamics. Building on community partnerships with NGOs, our team has worked closely with a previously defined “environmental justice” community to elicit the ways in which the energy transition is perceived to result in energy justice and injustice by energy system specialists and by community members. We find that community members in particular fear getting “priced out” of their community as energy system upgrades are implemented, and also feel that systemic injustices such as racialized governance structures would be exacerbated. We also identify the ways that energy justice is conceptualized whereby community members identify co-benefits such as improved housing, lower pollution, and an opportunity for energy democracy as possible outcomes of the energy transition. We offer concrete takeaways about the value of ethnographic energy justice research in partnership with communities and the application of energy justice frameworks that can be heeded by researchers and policymakers alike.
{"title":"Whose low-carbon future? Community perceptions and expectations on the renewable energy transition in a post-industrial city","authors":"Alison Bates , Ogechi Vivian Nwadiaru , Anna Goldstein , Julia Cantor , Makaylah Cowan , Marina Pineda Shokooh , Krista Harper","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103781","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103781","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition of the energy system to renewables can lead to inequities. Under-resourced and marginalized community members are vulnerable to disproportionate burdens of the energy system, particularly in post-industrial cities also grappling with social pressures associated with disinvestment and deindustrialization, climate change threats, and pressures of urban renewal. In this study, we use expert elicitation, ethnographic participant observation, and community focus groups to examine issues and conceptualizations of energy justice in a minority-majority post-industrial city undergoing rapid energy transformation alongside gentrification and other changing community dynamics. Building on community partnerships with NGOs, our team has worked closely with a previously defined “environmental justice” community to elicit the ways in which the energy transition is perceived to result in energy justice and injustice by energy system specialists and by community members. We find that community members in particular fear getting “priced out” of their community as energy system upgrades are implemented, and also feel that systemic injustices such as racialized governance structures would be exacerbated. We also identify the ways that energy justice is conceptualized whereby community members identify co-benefits such as improved housing, lower pollution, and an opportunity for energy democracy as possible outcomes of the energy transition. We offer concrete takeaways about the value of ethnographic energy justice research in partnership with communities and the application of energy justice frameworks that can be heeded by researchers and policymakers alike.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103781"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142432527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-13DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103785
Kees van der Wel, Sanne Akerboom
Energy systems need to evolve to manage the rapid increase in distributed and intermittent renewable energy sources and growing peak loads. Smart local energy systems (SLESs) offer a promising approach by decentralizing and digitalizing energy management. However, SLESs risk exacerbating pre-existing disparities, because socioeconomically disadvantaged groups cannot participate in SLESs and therefore miss out on the benefits. One approach to addressing this issue is for those involved in SLES projects to safeguard the value of energy justice. While current research clearly indicates that energy justice is not safeguarded in SLES projects, it is unclear why. In this study, we draw on public values theory to investigate whether involved actors (i) altogether overlook justice, (ii) misunderstand justice as something other than energy justice, or (iii) sideline energy justice. Our investigation into four Dutch SLES projects, by means of fifteen semi-structured interviews and document analysis, reveals that justice is not overlooked. Rather, due to the narrow scope of SLES projects, involved actors rarely conceive justice in ways that resemble energy justice. When energy justice is considered, then this public value is often perceived as out of scope and a concern for later. These findings contribute to energy justice literature by providing actionable insights into why energy justice might not be safeguarded in decision-making. Most notably, our study highlights the need for clearly defined energy justice goals in SLES projects to ensure that energy justice is safeguarded.
{"title":"Overlooked, misunderstood, or sidelined?","authors":"Kees van der Wel, Sanne Akerboom","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103785","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103785","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy systems need to evolve to manage the rapid increase in distributed and intermittent renewable energy sources and growing peak loads. Smart local energy systems (SLESs) offer a promising approach by decentralizing and digitalizing energy management. However, SLESs risk exacerbating pre-existing disparities, because socioeconomically disadvantaged groups cannot participate in SLESs and therefore miss out on the benefits. One approach to addressing this issue is for those involved in SLES projects to safeguard the value of energy justice. While current research clearly indicates that energy justice is not safeguarded in SLES projects, it is unclear <em>why</em>. In this study, we draw on public values theory to investigate whether involved actors (i) altogether overlook justice, (ii) misunderstand justice as something other than energy justice, or (iii) sideline energy justice. Our investigation into four Dutch SLES projects, by means of fifteen semi-structured interviews and document analysis, reveals that justice is not overlooked. Rather, due to the narrow scope of SLES projects, involved actors rarely conceive justice in ways that resemble energy justice. When energy justice is considered, then this public value is often perceived as out of scope and a concern for later. These findings contribute to energy justice literature by providing actionable insights into why energy justice might not be safeguarded in decision-making. Most notably, our study highlights the need for clearly defined energy justice goals in SLES projects to ensure that energy justice is safeguarded.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103785"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142432529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Visions of energy futures produced via co-created methodologies can provide robust alternatives to the prevailing imaginaries held by international and state actors – crucial for sustaining progress towards energy transitions that meet community needs and realities. This paper explores the co-creative design of a methodology for community visions for energy transitions. Insights are drawn from the development and outputs of a collaborative workshop aimed at adapting community visioning to different local contexts with four partners from across Europe. We analyse empirical evidence, including transcripts of conversations with participating local authorities and NGO representatives and resources prepared for the workshop, to detail how collaboration proceeded. The results highlight that practices fostering inclusion, mutual learning, and relationship building can give partners ownership over visioning to better ensure that its design reflects local, situated knowledges and is well suited to communities. However, the messy, human nature of co-creation requires commitment to flexibility and ongoing dialogue. Overall, the experiences highlighted in this paper serve as a valuable resource for future researchers and practitioners interested in exploring how to further energy system transformation and support community-driven local energy transitions.
{"title":"Co-creating a community visioning methodology for energy transitions: Principles, practices, and reflections","authors":"Emily K. Gray , Frances Fahy , Rachel McArdle , Melanie Rohse","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103783","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103783","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Visions of energy futures produced via co-created methodologies can provide robust alternatives to the prevailing imaginaries held by international and state actors – crucial for sustaining progress towards energy transitions that meet community needs and realities. This paper explores the co-creative design of a methodology for community visions for energy transitions. Insights are drawn from the development and outputs of a collaborative workshop aimed at adapting community visioning to different local contexts with four partners from across Europe. We analyse empirical evidence, including transcripts of conversations with participating local authorities and NGO representatives and resources prepared for the workshop, to detail how collaboration proceeded. The results highlight that practices fostering inclusion, mutual learning, and relationship building can give partners ownership over visioning to better ensure that its design reflects local, situated knowledges and is well suited to communities. However, the messy, human nature of co-creation requires commitment to flexibility and ongoing dialogue. Overall, the experiences highlighted in this paper serve as a valuable resource for future researchers and practitioners interested in exploring how to further energy system transformation and support community-driven local energy transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103783"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142432528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-13DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103787
David Borge-Diez , Susana Silva , Pedro Cabrera , Paula Sarmento , Enrique Rosales-Asensio
Environmental problems, particularly climate change, have raised awareness of the need to decarbonize the energy sector. Several policies have been followed worldwide, including high energy taxes in European countries. However, simultaneously, many countries still suffer from energy poverty, and energy taxation only aggravates this problem. Considering this situation, this research proposes implementing green tax reform in European countries where energy tax revenues would be used to alleviate energy poverty. This article analyzes the situation of European Union Member States regarding some relevant variables such as energy tax revenues and energy poverty indicators (inability to keep the home adequately safe, low final energy consumption in households, arrears on utility bills, and electricity prices). The results show a significant variation in the total share required for energy bills, ranging from 5 % to 40 %. Countries with high energy tax revenues suffering from energy poverty are identified as potential candidates for the proposed reform. It was found that Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Slovakia are good candidates for reform. This situation is combined with an inefficient tax policy, resulting in a large amount of money being transferred for direct and indirect fossil fuels and environmentally harmful subsidies. An energy tax recycling scheme focused on reducing energy consumption using energy efficiency measures, for example, under a scheme of Public Energy Services, can be optimally combined to redistribute the energy tax income to reduce energy poverty and contribute to decarbonization if combined with a new scheme that removes harmful fossil fuel subsidies.
{"title":"Energy taxes recycling as an instrument for the mitigation of the expenditure on energy products of vulnerable households in the European Union","authors":"David Borge-Diez , Susana Silva , Pedro Cabrera , Paula Sarmento , Enrique Rosales-Asensio","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103787","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103787","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental problems, particularly climate change, have raised awareness of the need to decarbonize the energy sector. Several policies have been followed worldwide, including high energy taxes in European countries. However, simultaneously, many countries still suffer from energy poverty, and energy taxation only aggravates this problem. Considering this situation, this research proposes implementing green tax reform in European countries where energy tax revenues would be used to alleviate energy poverty. This article analyzes the situation of European Union Member States regarding some relevant variables such as energy tax revenues and energy poverty indicators (inability to keep the home adequately safe, low final energy consumption in households, arrears on utility bills, and electricity prices). The results show a significant variation in the total share required for energy bills, ranging from 5 % to 40 %. Countries with high energy tax revenues suffering from energy poverty are identified as potential candidates for the proposed reform. It was found that Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Slovakia are good candidates for reform. This situation is combined with an inefficient tax policy, resulting in a large amount of money being transferred for direct and indirect fossil fuels and environmentally harmful subsidies. An energy tax recycling scheme focused on reducing energy consumption using energy efficiency measures, for example, under a scheme of Public Energy Services, can be optimally combined to redistribute the energy tax income to reduce energy poverty and contribute to decarbonization if combined with a new scheme that removes harmful fossil fuel subsidies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142424924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-13DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103782
Trong-Anh Trinh , Russell Smyth , Sefa Awaworyi Churchill , Siew Ling Yew
Research on climate change and its effects has seen a surge in interest as global temperatures continue to rise. A related body of literature focuses on the impact of weather on financial decisions. However, there is very little evidence on the channels through which temperature shocks affect savings. This is a significant shortcoming in the existing literature given the growing tendency among policymakers to use savings as an indicator of financial wellbeing. We present the first study on the impact of weather shocks and climate change on household savings behaviour. We use data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, which we merge with satellite data measuring temperature shocks at the neighbourhood level. We find that the number of days when daily average temperatures are below 10 °C or above 30 °C has a negative effect on net worth and savings, relative to the number of days in the 20-25 °C range. We find that income, risk preferences and time preferences mediate the relationship between temperature shocks and savings. To examine the impact of climate change, we use temperature projections to simulate how global warming can be expected to affect savings and net worth in the short, medium and long-term. We find that over the course of the rest of the century, if no counter measures are taken to address climate change, net worth would decrease by 0.358 standard deviations and savings by 0.034 standard deviations compared with the ‘best case’ scenario for climate change which saw the widespread adoption of renewable energy sources.
{"title":"A financial disaster in the making: Temperature shocks, climate change and savings","authors":"Trong-Anh Trinh , Russell Smyth , Sefa Awaworyi Churchill , Siew Ling Yew","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103782","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103782","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on climate change and its effects has seen a surge in interest as global temperatures continue to rise. A related body of literature focuses on the impact of weather on financial decisions. However, there is very little evidence on the channels through which temperature shocks affect savings. This is a significant shortcoming in the existing literature given the growing tendency among policymakers to use savings as an indicator of financial wellbeing. We present the first study on the impact of weather shocks and climate change on household savings behaviour. We use data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, which we merge with satellite data measuring temperature shocks at the neighbourhood level. We find that the number of days when daily average temperatures are below 10 °C or above 30 °C has a negative effect on net worth and savings, relative to the number of days in the 20-25 °C range. We find that income, risk preferences and time preferences mediate the relationship between temperature shocks and savings. To examine the impact of climate change, we use temperature projections to simulate how global warming can be expected to affect savings and net worth in the short, medium and long-term. We find that over the course of the rest of the century, if no counter measures are taken to address climate change, net worth would decrease by 0.358 standard deviations and savings by 0.034 standard deviations compared with the ‘best case’ scenario for climate change which saw the widespread adoption of renewable energy sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103782"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142432530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}