首页 > 最新文献

Quarterly Journal of Economics最新文献

英文 中文
The Return to Protectionism* 保护主义的回归*
IF 13.7 1区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/QJE/QJZ036
Pablo D. Fajgelbaum, P. Goldberg, P. Kennedy, A. Khandelwal
After decades of supporting free trade, in 2018 the United States raised import tariffs and major trade partners retaliated. We analyze the short-run impact of this return to protectionism on the U.S. economy. Import and retaliatory tariffs caused large declines in imports and exports. Prices of imports targeted by tariffs did not fall, implying complete pass-through of tariffs to duty-inclusive prices. The resulting losses to U.S. consumers and firms that buy imports was $51 billion, or 0.27% of GDP. We embed the estimated trade elasticities in a general-equilibrium model of the U.S. economy. After accounting for tariff revenue and gains to domestic producers, the aggregate real income loss was $7.2 billion, or 0.04% of GDP. Import tariffs favored sectors concentrated in politically competitive counties, and the model implies that tradeable-sector workers in heavily Republican counties were the most negatively affected due to the retaliatory tariffs. JEL Code: F1.
在支持自由贸易几十年后,2018年,美国提高了进口关税,主要贸易伙伴进行了报复。我们分析了保护主义回归对美国经济的短期影响。进口和报复性关税导致进出口大幅下降。关税所针对的进口商品价格没有下降,这意味着关税完全转嫁到含税价格。由此给美国消费者和购买进口产品的公司造成的损失为510亿美元,占GDP的0.27%。我们将估计的贸易弹性嵌入美国经济的一般均衡模型中。在计入关税收入和国内生产商收益后,实际收入损失总额为72亿美元,占GDP的0.04%。进口关税有利于集中在政治竞争县的行业,该模型表明,由于报复性关税,共和党占多数的县的可贸易行业工人受到的负面影响最大。JEL代码:F1。
{"title":"The Return to Protectionism*","authors":"Pablo D. Fajgelbaum, P. Goldberg, P. Kennedy, A. Khandelwal","doi":"10.1093/QJE/QJZ036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/QJE/QJZ036","url":null,"abstract":"After decades of supporting free trade, in 2018 the United States raised import tariffs and major trade partners retaliated. We analyze the short-run impact of this return to protectionism on the U.S. economy. Import and retaliatory tariffs caused large declines in imports and exports. Prices of imports targeted by tariffs did not fall, implying complete pass-through of tariffs to duty-inclusive prices. The resulting losses to U.S. consumers and firms that buy imports was $51 billion, or 0.27% of GDP. We embed the estimated trade elasticities in a general-equilibrium model of the U.S. economy. After accounting for tariff revenue and gains to domestic producers, the aggregate real income loss was $7.2 billion, or 0.04% of GDP. Import tariffs favored sectors concentrated in politically competitive counties, and the model implies that tradeable-sector workers in heavily Republican counties were the most negatively affected due to the retaliatory tariffs. JEL Code: F1.","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/QJE/QJZ036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44203365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 173
How Acquisitions Affect Firm Behavior and Performance: Evidence from the Dialysis Industry* 收购如何影响企业行为和绩效:来自透析行业的证据*
IF 13.7 1区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjz034
Paul J. Eliason, Benjamin Heebsh, R. McDevitt, James W. Roberts
Many industries have become increasingly concentrated through mergers and acquisitions, which in health care may have important consequences for spending and outcomes. Using a rich panel of Medicare claims data for nearly one million dialysis patients, we advance the literature on the effects of mergers and acquisitions by studying the precise ways providers change their behavior following an acquisition. We base our empirical analysis on more than 1,200 acquisitions of independent dialysis facilities by large chains over a 12-year period and find that chains transfer several prominent strategies to the facilities they acquire. Most notably, acquired facilities converge to the behavior of their new parent companies by increasing patients’ doses of highly reimbursed drugs, replacing high-skill nurses with less-skilled technicians, and waitlisting fewer patients for kidney transplants. We then show that patients fare worse as a result of these changes: outcomes such as hospitalizations and mortality deteriorate, with our long panel allowing us to identify these effects from within-facility or within-patient variation around the acquisitions. Because overall Medicare spending increases at acquired facilities, mostly as a result of higher drug reimbursements, this decline in quality corresponds to a decline in value for payers. We conclude the article by considering the channels through which acquisitions produce such large changes in provider behavior and outcomes, finding that increased market power cannot explain the decline in quality. Rather, the adoption of the acquiring firm’s strategies and practices drives our main results, with greater economies of scale for drug purchasing responsible for more than half of the change in profits following an acquisition.
许多行业通过并购变得越来越集中,在医疗保健领域,并购可能会对支出和结果产生重要影响。利用近100万透析患者的丰富医疗保险索赔数据,我们通过研究供应商在收购后改变行为的确切方式,推进了关于并购影响的文献。我们的实证分析基于大型连锁店在12年内对1200多家独立透析设施的收购,发现连锁店将几个突出的战略转移到了他们收购的设施上。最值得注意的是,收购的设施通过增加患者的™ 剂量的高报销药物,用技术水平较低的技术人员取代高技能护士,等待肾移植的患者减少。然后,我们发现,由于这些变化,患者的情况更糟:住院和死亡率等结果恶化,我们的长小组使我们能够从机构内部或患者内部的采集变化中识别这些影响。由于收购设施的总体医疗保险支出增加,主要是由于药品报销增加,因此这种质量的下降与支付者的价值下降相对应。我们通过考虑收购对供应商行为和结果产生如此大变化的渠道来总结这篇文章,发现市场力量的增加并不能解释质量的下降。相反,收购公司™s的战略和实践推动了我们的主要成果,药品采购的规模经济占收购后利润变化的一半以上。
{"title":"How Acquisitions Affect Firm Behavior and Performance: Evidence from the Dialysis Industry*","authors":"Paul J. Eliason, Benjamin Heebsh, R. McDevitt, James W. Roberts","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjz034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz034","url":null,"abstract":"Many industries have become increasingly concentrated through mergers and acquisitions, which in health care may have important consequences for spending and outcomes. Using a rich panel of Medicare claims data for nearly one million dialysis patients, we advance the literature on the effects of mergers and acquisitions by studying the precise ways providers change their behavior following an acquisition. We base our empirical analysis on more than 1,200 acquisitions of independent dialysis facilities by large chains over a 12-year period and find that chains transfer several prominent strategies to the facilities they acquire. Most notably, acquired facilities converge to the behavior of their new parent companies by increasing patients’ doses of highly reimbursed drugs, replacing high-skill nurses with less-skilled technicians, and waitlisting fewer patients for kidney transplants. We then show that patients fare worse as a result of these changes: outcomes such as hospitalizations and mortality deteriorate, with our long panel allowing us to identify these effects from within-facility or within-patient variation around the acquisitions. Because overall Medicare spending increases at acquired facilities, mostly as a result of higher drug reimbursements, this decline in quality corresponds to a decline in value for payers. We conclude the article by considering the channels through which acquisitions produce such large changes in provider behavior and outcomes, finding that increased market power cannot explain the decline in quality. Rather, the adoption of the acquiring firm’s strategies and practices drives our main results, with greater economies of scale for drug purchasing responsible for more than half of the change in profits following an acquisition.","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/qje/qjz034","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46567614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
What do Workplace Wellness Programs do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study. 工作场所健康计划的作用是什么?来自伊利诺伊州工作场所健康研究的证据。
IF 11.1 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2019-11-01 Epub Date: 2019-08-16 DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjz023
Damon Jones, David Molitor, Julian Reif

Workplace wellness programs cover over 50 million U.S. workers and are intended to reduce medical spending, increase productivity, and improve well-being. Yet limited evidence exists to support these claims. We designed and implemented a comprehensive workplace wellness program for a large employer and randomly assigned program eligibility and financial incentives at the individual level for nearly 5,000 employees. We find strong patterns of selection: during the year prior to the intervention, program participants had lower medical expenditures and healthier behaviors than nonparticipants. The program persistently increased health screening rates, but we do not find significant causal effects of treatment on total medical expenditures, other health behaviors, employee productivity, or self-reported health status after more than two years. Our 95% confidence intervals rule out 84% of previous estimates on medical spending and absenteeism.

工作场所健康计划覆盖了5000多万美国工人,旨在减少医疗支出,提高生产力,改善福祉。然而,支持这些说法的证据有限。我们为一家大型雇主设计并实施了一项全面的工作场所健康计划,并为近5000名员工在个人层面随机分配了计划资格和经济激励。我们发现了强有力的选择模式:在干预前一年,项目参与者的医疗支出和行为都低于非参与者。该计划持续提高了健康筛查率,但我们没有发现治疗对总医疗支出、其他健康行为、员工生产力或两年多后自我报告的健康状况有显著的因果影响。我们95%的置信区间排除了之前对医疗支出和缺勤的84%的估计。
{"title":"What do Workplace Wellness Programs do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study.","authors":"Damon Jones, David Molitor, Julian Reif","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjz023","DOIUrl":"10.1093/qje/qjz023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Workplace wellness programs cover over 50 million U.S. workers and are intended to reduce medical spending, increase productivity, and improve well-being. Yet limited evidence exists to support these claims. We designed and implemented a comprehensive workplace wellness program for a large employer and randomly assigned program eligibility and financial incentives at the individual level for nearly 5,000 employees. We find strong patterns of selection: during the year prior to the intervention, program participants had lower medical expenditures and healthier behaviors than nonparticipants. The program persistently increased health screening rates, but we do not find significant causal effects of treatment on total medical expenditures, other health behaviors, employee productivity, or self-reported health status after more than two years. Our 95% confidence intervals rule out 84% of previous estimates on medical spending and absenteeism.</p>","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756192/pdf/qjz023.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41223095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WHO PROFITS FROM PATENTS? RENT-SHARING AT INNOVATIVE FIRMS. 谁从专利中获利?创新型企业的租金分享。
IF 13.7 1区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2019-08-01 Epub Date: 2019-03-27 DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjz011
Patrick Kline, Neviana Petkova, Heidi Williams, Owen Zidar

This article analyzes how patent-induced shocks to labor productivity propagate into worker compensation using a new linkage of U.S. patent applications to U.S. business and worker tax records. We infer the causal effects of patent allowances by comparing firms whose patent applications were initially allowed to those whose patent applications were initially rejected. To identify patents that are ex ante valuable, we extrapolate the excess stock return estimates of Kogan et al. (2017) to the full set of accepted and rejected patent applications based on predetermined firm and patent application characteristics. An initial allowance of an ex ante valuable patent generates substantial increases in firm productivity and worker compensation. By contrast, initial allowances of lower ex ante value patents yield no detectable effects on firm outcomes. Patent allowances lead firms to increase employment, but entry wages and workforce composition are insensitive to patent decisions. On average, workers capture roughly 30 cents of every dollar of patent-induced surplus in higher earnings. This share is roughly twice as high among workers present since the year of application. These earnings effects are concentrated among men and workers in the top half of the earnings distribution and are paired with corresponding improvements in worker retention among these groups. We interpret these earnings responses as reflecting the capture of economic rents by senior workers, who are most costly for innovative firms to replace.

本文利用美国专利申请与美国企业和工人纳税记录之间的新联系,分析了专利对劳动生产率的冲击如何传播到工人报酬中。我们通过比较专利申请最初获准的企业与专利申请最初被驳回的企业,推断专利许可的因果效应。为了识别事前有价值的专利,我们根据预先确定的企业和专利申请特征,将 Kogan 等人(2017 年)的超额股票回报率估计值外推至全部被接受和被拒绝的专利申请。一项事前有价值的专利的初始许可会大幅提高企业生产率和工人报酬。与此相反,对事前价值较低的专利的初始允许对企业成果没有产生可检测的影响。专利许可会导致企业增加就业,但初始工资和劳动力构成对专利决定并不敏感。平均而言,在每一美元的专利盈余中,工人可以通过提高收入获得大约 30 美分。在自申请当年起就在职的工人中,这一比例大约是前者的两倍。这些收入效应主要集中在男性和收入分布前半部分的工人身上,同时这些群体的工人保留率也相应提高。我们将这些收入效应解释为资深工人获取了经济租金,因为对于创新型企业来说,取代资深工人的成本最高。
{"title":"WHO PROFITS FROM PATENTS? RENT-SHARING AT INNOVATIVE FIRMS.","authors":"Patrick Kline, Neviana Petkova, Heidi Williams, Owen Zidar","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjz011","DOIUrl":"10.1093/qje/qjz011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article analyzes how patent-induced shocks to labor productivity propagate into worker compensation using a new linkage of U.S. patent applications to U.S. business and worker tax records. We infer the causal effects of patent allowances by comparing firms whose patent applications were initially allowed to those whose patent applications were initially rejected. To identify patents that are ex ante valuable, we extrapolate the excess stock return estimates of Kogan et al. (2017) to the full set of accepted and rejected patent applications based on predetermined firm and patent application characteristics. An initial allowance of an ex ante valuable patent generates substantial increases in firm productivity and worker compensation. By contrast, initial allowances of lower ex ante value patents yield no detectable effects on firm outcomes. Patent allowances lead firms to increase employment, but entry wages and workforce composition are insensitive to patent decisions. On average, workers capture roughly 30 cents of every dollar of patent-induced surplus in higher earnings. This share is roughly twice as high among workers present since the year of application. These earnings effects are concentrated among men and workers in the top half of the earnings distribution and are paired with corresponding improvements in worker retention among these groups. We interpret these earnings responses as reflecting the capture of economic rents by senior workers, who are most costly for innovative firms to replace.</p>","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470084/pdf/nihms-998945.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38456781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The More We Die, The More We Sell? A Simple Test of the Home-Market Effect. 我们死得越多,卖出的就越多?国内市场效应的简单测试。
IF 13.7 1区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2019-05-01 Epub Date: 2019-01-21 DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjz003
Arnaud Costinot, Dave Donaldson, Margaret Kyle, Heidi Williams

The home-market effect, first hypothesized by Linder (1961) and later formalized by Krugman (1980), is the idea that countries with larger demand for some products at home tend to have larger sales of the same products abroad. In this article, we develop a simple test of the home-market effect using detailed drug sales data from the global pharmaceutical industry. The core of our empirical strategy is the observation that a country's exogenous demographic composition can be used as a predictor of the diseases that its inhabitants are most likely to die from and, in turn, the drugs they are most likely to demand. We find that the correlation between predicted home demand and sales abroad is positive and greater than the correlation between predicted home demand and purchases from abroad. In short, countries tend to be net sellers of the drugs they demand the most, as predicted by Linder (1961) and Krugman (1980).

国内市场效应最初由Linder(1961)假设,后来由Krugman(1980)正式化,是指国内对某些产品需求较大的国家往往在国外有更大的相同产品销量。在这篇文章中,我们利用全球制药行业的详细药品销售数据,开发了一个简单的国内市场效应测试。我们实证策略的核心是观察到,一个国家的外源性人口构成可以用来预测其居民最有可能死于的疾病,进而预测他们最有可能需要的药物。我们发现,预测的国内需求与国外销售之间的相关性是正的,并且大于预测的国内需要与国外采购之间的相关性。简而言之,正如Linder(1961)和Krugman(1980)所预测的那样,各国往往是其需求量最大的药物的净卖家。
{"title":"The More We Die, The More We Sell? A Simple Test of the Home-Market Effect.","authors":"Arnaud Costinot,&nbsp;Dave Donaldson,&nbsp;Margaret Kyle,&nbsp;Heidi Williams","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjz003","DOIUrl":"10.1093/qje/qjz003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The home-market effect, first hypothesized by Linder (1961) and later formalized by Krugman (1980), is the idea that countries with larger demand for some products at home tend to have larger sales of the same products abroad. In this article, we develop a simple test of the home-market effect using detailed drug sales data from the global pharmaceutical industry. The core of our empirical strategy is the observation that a country's exogenous demographic composition can be used as a predictor of the diseases that its inhabitants are most likely to die from and, in turn, the drugs they are most likely to demand. We find that the correlation between predicted home demand and sales abroad is positive and greater than the correlation between predicted home demand and purchases from abroad. In short, countries tend to be net sellers of the drugs they demand the most, as predicted by Linder (1961) and Krugman (1980).</p>","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/qje/qjz003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37150160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57
THE PRICE AIN'T RIGHT? HOSPITAL PRICES AND HEALTH SPENDING ON THE PRIVATELY INSURED. 价格不合适?医院价格和私人投保人的医疗支出。
IF 13.7 1区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2019-02-01 Epub Date: 2018-09-04 DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjy020
Zack Cooper, Stuart V Craig, Martin Gaynor, John Van Reenen

We use insurance claims data covering 28% of individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance in the United States to study the variation in health spending on the privately insured, examine the structure of insurer-hospital contracts, and analyze the variation in hospital prices across the nation. Health spending per privately insured beneficiary differs by a factor of three across geographic areas and has a very low correlation with Medicare spending. For the privately insured, half of the spending variation is driven by price variation across regions, and half is driven by quantity variation. Prices vary substantially across regions, across hospitals within regions, and even within hospitals. For example, even for a nearly homogeneous service such as lower-limb magnetic resonance imaging, about a fifth of the total case-level price variation occurs within a hospital in the cross section. Hospital market structure is strongly associated with price levels and contract structure. Prices at monopoly hospitals are 12% higher than those in markets with four or more rivals. Monopoly hospitals also have contracts that load more risk on insurers (e.g., they have more cases with prices set as a share of their charges). In concentrated insurer markets the opposite occurs-hospitals have lower prices and bear more financial risk. Examining the 366 mergers and acquisitions that occurred between 2007 and 2011, we find that prices increased by over 6% when the merging hospitals were geographically close (e.g., 5 miles or less apart), but not when the hospitals were geographically distant (e.g., over 25 miles apart).

我们利用涵盖美国 28% 由雇主提供医疗保险的个人的保险理赔数据,研究了私人投保人医疗支出的变化,考察了投保人-医院合同的结构,并分析了全国各地医院价格的变化。在不同的地理区域,每名私人保险受益人的医疗支出相差三倍,与医疗保险支出的相关性很低。对于私人投保人来说,一半的支出变化是由不同地区的价格变化造成的,一半是由数量变化造成的。不同地区、地区内不同医院、甚至医院内部的价格都有很大差异。例如,即使是下肢磁共振成像这种几乎同质的服务,在横截面中,病例总价格变化的五分之一也发生在医院内部。医院市场结构与价格水平和合同结构密切相关。垄断医院的价格比有四个或更多竞争对手的市场高出 12%。垄断医院的合同也会给保险公司带来更多的风险(例如,它们有更多的病例,其价格是按其收费的一定比例确定的)。而在集中的保险公司市场,情况恰恰相反--医院的价格更低,承担的财务风险更大。在对 2007 年至 2011 年间发生的 366 起并购案进行研究后,我们发现,当并购医院的地理位置较近(如相距 5 英里或更近)时,价格会上涨 6% 以上,而当医院的地理位置较远(如相距 25 英里以上)时,价格则不会上涨。
{"title":"THE PRICE AIN'T RIGHT? HOSPITAL PRICES AND HEALTH SPENDING ON THE PRIVATELY INSURED.","authors":"Zack Cooper, Stuart V Craig, Martin Gaynor, John Van Reenen","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjy020","DOIUrl":"10.1093/qje/qjy020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We use insurance claims data covering 28% of individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance in the United States to study the variation in health spending on the privately insured, examine the structure of insurer-hospital contracts, and analyze the variation in hospital prices across the nation. Health spending per privately insured beneficiary differs by a factor of three across geographic areas and has a very low correlation with Medicare spending. For the privately insured, half of the spending variation is driven by price variation across regions, and half is driven by quantity variation. Prices vary substantially across regions, across hospitals within regions, and even within hospitals. For example, even for a nearly homogeneous service such as lower-limb magnetic resonance imaging, about a fifth of the total case-level price variation occurs within a hospital in the cross section. Hospital market structure is strongly associated with price levels and contract structure. Prices at monopoly hospitals are 12% higher than those in markets with four or more rivals. Monopoly hospitals also have contracts that load more risk on insurers (e.g., they have more cases with prices set as a share of their charges). In concentrated insurer markets the opposite occurs-hospitals have lower prices and bear more financial risk. Examining the 366 mergers and acquisitions that occurred between 2007 and 2011, we find that prices increased by over 6% when the merging hospitals were geographically close (e.g., 5 miles or less apart), but not when the hospitals were geographically distant (e.g., over 25 miles apart).</p>","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7517591/pdf/nihms-1033672.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38521130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Political Advertising and Election Results 政治广告和选举结果
IF 13.7 1区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/QJE/QJY010
Jörg L. Spenkuch, D. Toniatti
We study the persuasive effects of political advertising. Our empirical strategy exploits FCC regulations that result in plausibly exogenous variation in the number of impressions across the borders of neighboring counties. Applying this approach to detailed data on television advertisement broadcasts and viewership patterns during the 2004–12 presidential campaigns, our results indicate that total political advertising has almost no impact on aggregate turnout. By contrast, we find a positive and economically meaningful effect of advertising on candidates’ vote shares. Taken at face value, our estimates imply that a one standard deviation increase in the partisan difference in advertising raises the partisan difference in vote shares by about 0.5 percentage points. Evidence from a regression discontinuity design suggests that advertising affects election results by altering the partisan composition of the electorate.
我们研究政治广告的说服效果。我们的经验策略利用FCC法规,导致在相邻县的边界上的印象数量的似是而非的外生变化。将此方法应用于2004-12年总统竞选期间电视广告广播和观众模式的详细数据,我们的结果表明,政治广告总量对总投票率几乎没有影响。相比之下,我们发现广告对候选人的投票份额有积极的和有经济意义的影响。从表面上看,我们的估计表明,广告中的党派差异每增加一个标准差,投票份额的党派差异就会增加约0.5个百分点。来自回归不连续设计的证据表明,广告通过改变选民的党派组成来影响选举结果。
{"title":"Political Advertising and Election Results","authors":"Jörg L. Spenkuch, D. Toniatti","doi":"10.1093/QJE/QJY010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/QJE/QJY010","url":null,"abstract":"We study the persuasive effects of political advertising. Our empirical strategy exploits FCC regulations that result in plausibly exogenous variation in the number of impressions across the borders of neighboring counties. Applying this approach to detailed data on television advertisement broadcasts and viewership patterns during the 2004–12 presidential campaigns, our results indicate that total political advertising has almost no impact on aggregate turnout. By contrast, we find a positive and economically meaningful effect of advertising on candidates’ vote shares. Taken at face value, our estimates imply that a one standard deviation increase in the partisan difference in advertising raises the partisan difference in vote shares by about 0.5 percentage points. Evidence from a regression discontinuity design suggests that advertising affects election results by altering the partisan composition of the electorate.","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/QJE/QJY010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43271819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 119
RANKING FIRMS USING REVEALED PREFERENCE. 使用显示偏好对公司进行排名。
IF 13.7 1区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2018-08-01 Epub Date: 2018-01-17 DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjy001
Isaac Sorkin

This article estimates workers' preferences for firms by studying the structure of employer-to-employer transitions in U.S. administrative data. The article uses a tool from numerical linear algebra to measure the central tendency of worker flows, which is closely related to the ranking of firms revealed by workers' choices. There is evidence for compensating differentials when workers systematically move to lower-paying firms in a way that cannot be accounted for by layoffs or differences in recruiting intensity. The estimates suggest that compensating differentials account for over half of the firm component of the variance of earnings.

本文通过研究美国行政数据中雇主到雇主转换的结构来估计工人对公司的偏好。本文使用数值线性代数的工具来衡量工人流动的集中趋势,这与工人选择所揭示的企业排名密切相关。有证据表明,当工人以一种无法用裁员或招聘强度差异来解释的方式系统性地转移到薪酬较低的公司时,存在补偿差异。这些估计表明,补偿性差异占收入差异的公司组成部分的一半以上。
{"title":"RANKING FIRMS USING REVEALED PREFERENCE.","authors":"Isaac Sorkin","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjy001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article estimates workers' preferences for firms by studying the structure of employer-to-employer transitions in U.S. administrative data. The article uses a tool from numerical linear algebra to measure the central tendency of worker flows, which is closely related to the ranking of firms revealed by workers' choices. There is evidence for compensating differentials when workers systematically move to lower-paying firms in a way that cannot be accounted for by layoffs or differences in recruiting intensity. The estimates suggest that compensating differentials account for over half of the firm component of the variance of earnings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/qje/qjy001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36370904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 220
Recommender Systems as Mechanisms for Social Learning 推荐系统作为社会学习机制
IF 13.7 1区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI: 10.1093/QJE/QJX044
Yeon-Koo Che, Johannes Hörner
This article studies how a recommender system may incentivize users to learn about a product collaboratively. To improve the incentives for early exploration, the optimal design trades off fully transparent disclosure by selectively overrecommending the product (or “spamming”) to a fraction of users. Under the optimal scheme, the designer spams very little on a product immediately after its release but gradually increases its frequency; she stops it altogether when she becomes sufficiently pessimistic about the product. The recommender’s product research and intrinsic/naive users “seed” incentives for user exploration and determine the speed and trajectory of social learning. Potential applications for various Internet recommendation platforms and implications for review/ratings inflation are discussed.
本文研究了推荐系统如何激励用户协同学习产品。为了提高早期探索的动机,最佳设计通过选择性地向一小部分用户过度推荐产品(或“垃圾邮件”)来换取完全透明的披露。在最优方案下,设计师在产品发布后立即对其进行垃圾邮件处理,但频率逐渐增加;当她对产品变得足够悲观时,她就完全停止了。推荐人的产品研究和内在/天真用户为用户探索“种子”激励,并决定社交学习的速度和轨迹。讨论了各种互联网推荐平台的潜在应用以及对审查/评级膨胀的影响。
{"title":"Recommender Systems as Mechanisms for Social Learning","authors":"Yeon-Koo Che, Johannes Hörner","doi":"10.1093/QJE/QJX044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/QJE/QJX044","url":null,"abstract":"This article studies how a recommender system may incentivize users to learn about a product collaboratively. To improve the incentives for early exploration, the optimal design trades off fully transparent disclosure by selectively overrecommending the product (or “spamming”) to a fraction of users. Under the optimal scheme, the designer spams very little on a product immediately after its release but gradually increases its frequency; she stops it altogether when she becomes sufficiently pessimistic about the product. The recommender’s product research and intrinsic/naive users “seed” incentives for user exploration and determine the speed and trajectory of social learning. Potential applications for various Internet recommendation platforms and implications for review/ratings inflation are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/QJE/QJX044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41289395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 95
Distributional,National,Accounts: Methods,and,Estimates,for,the,United,States 分配、国民账户:美国的方法和估计
IF 13.7 1区 经济学 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI: 10.1093/QJE/QJX043
T. Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, G. Zucman
This paper combines tax, survey, and national accounts data to estimate the distribution of national income in the United States since 1913. Our distributional national accounts capture 100% of national income, allowing us to compute growth rates for each quantile of the income distribution consistent with macroeconomic growth. We estimate the distribution of both pre-tax and post-tax income, making it possible to provide a comprehensive view of how government redistribution affects inequality. Average pre-tax national income per adult has increased 60% since 1980, but we find that it has stagnated for the bottom 50% of the distribution at about $16,000 a year. The pre-tax income of the middle class—adults between the median and the 90th percentile—has grown 40% since 1980, faster than what tax and survey data suggest, due in particular to the rise of tax-exempt fringe benefits. Income has boomed at the top: in 1980, top 1% adults earned on average 27 times more than bottom 50% adults, while they earn 81 times more today. The upsurge of top incomes was first a labor income phenomenon but has mostly been a capital income phenomenon since 2000. The government has offset only a small fraction of the increase in inequality. The reduction of the gender gap in earnings has mitigated the increase in inequality among adults. The share of women, however, falls steeply as one moves up the labor income distribution, and is only 11% in the top 0.1% today.
本文结合税收、调查和国民账户数据来估计自1913年以来美国的国民收入分布。我们的分配国民账户占国民收入的100%,使我们能够计算与宏观经济增长一致的收入分配的每个分位数的增长率。我们估计了税前和税后收入的分布,从而有可能全面了解政府再分配如何影响不平等。自1980年以来,每个成年人的平均税前国民收入增长了60%,但我们发现,在分配的最后50%,这一数字停滞不前,每年约为16000美元。自1980年以来,中产阶级(介于中位数和第90百分位之间的成年人)的税前收入增长了40%,比税收和调查数据显示的要快,特别是由于免税附加福利的增加。收入在顶端激增:1980年,收入最高的1%成年人的平均收入是收入最低的50%成年人的27倍,而今天他们的收入是收入的81倍。最高收入的激增最初是一种劳动收入现象,但自2000年以来,主要是资本收入现象。政府只抵消了不平等加剧的一小部分。收入中性别差距的缩小缓解了成年人之间不平等的加剧。然而,随着劳动力收入分配的增加,女性的比例急剧下降,目前在前0.1%中仅占11%。
{"title":"Distributional,National,Accounts: Methods,and,Estimates,for,the,United,States","authors":"T. Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, G. Zucman","doi":"10.1093/QJE/QJX043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/QJE/QJX043","url":null,"abstract":"This paper combines tax, survey, and national accounts data to estimate the distribution of national income in the United States since 1913. Our distributional national accounts capture 100% of national income, allowing us to compute growth rates for each quantile of the income distribution consistent with macroeconomic growth. We estimate the distribution of both pre-tax and post-tax income, making it possible to provide a comprehensive view of how government redistribution affects inequality. Average pre-tax national income per adult has increased 60% since 1980, but we find that it has stagnated for the bottom 50% of the distribution at about $16,000 a year. The pre-tax income of the middle class—adults between the median and the 90th percentile—has grown 40% since 1980, faster than what tax and survey data suggest, due in particular to the rise of tax-exempt fringe benefits. Income has boomed at the top: in 1980, top 1% adults earned on average 27 times more than bottom 50% adults, while they earn 81 times more today. The upsurge of top incomes was first a labor income phenomenon but has mostly been a capital income phenomenon since 2000. The government has offset only a small fraction of the increase in inequality. The reduction of the gender gap in earnings has mitigated the increase in inequality among adults. The share of women, however, falls steeply as one moves up the labor income distribution, and is only 11% in the top 0.1% today.","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/QJE/QJX043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47820339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 816
期刊
Quarterly Journal of Economics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1