首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition最新文献

英文 中文
Reply to DS Ludwig et al. 回复DS Ludwig等人。
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.005
Kevin D Hall, Christina M Sciarrillo, Juen Guo, Aaron Hengist, Valerie L Darcey
{"title":"Reply to DS Ludwig et al.","authors":"Kevin D Hall, Christina M Sciarrillo, Juen Guo, Aaron Hengist, Valerie L Darcey","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Page 181"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142774345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The fatal threat of carryover effects to the validity of crossover dietary trials 结转效应对交叉饮食试验有效性的致命威胁。
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.025
David S Ludwig , Walter C Willett , Mary E Putt
{"title":"The fatal threat of carryover effects to the validity of crossover dietary trials","authors":"David S Ludwig , Walter C Willett , Mary E Putt","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.025","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 179-180"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.006
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 182-188"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143301182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of dietary choline intake with incidence of dementia, Alzheimer disease, and mild cognitive impairment: a large population-based prospective cohort study 膳食胆碱摄入量与痴呆症、阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍发病率的关系:一项大型人群前瞻性队列研究。
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.001
Ying-ying Niu , Hao-yu Yan , Jian-feng Zhong , Zhi-quan Diao , Jing Li , Cheng-ping Li , Lian-hong Chen , Wen-qi Huang , Miao Xu , Zhi-tong Xu , Xiao-feng Liang , Zhi-hao Li , Dan Liu

Background

Choline, an essential nutrient, plays a critical role in cognition, and may help prevent dementia and mild cognitive impairment. However, studies on dietary choline and its derivatives for preventing these conditions are limited and inconsistent.

Objective

The objective of this study was to explore the associations between dietary choline intake and the incidence of dementia, Alzheimer disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and current cognitive performance in the United Kingdom Biobank cohort.

Methods

Dietary choline intake was categorized into quartiles of consumption based on 24-h dietary recalls, with units expressed as milligrams per day. Diagnoses of dementia, AD, and MCI were identified using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9/10) codes. Current cognitive performance was assessed via the computerized touchscreen interface. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, dietary and lifestyle behaviors, and comorbid conditions, Cox proportional hazards regression, logistic regression, and restricted cubic splines were used to analyze the association between choline intake and dementia or cognitive performance.

Results

Among 125,594 participants (55.8% female), with a mean age of 56.1 y (range: 40–70 years) at baseline and a median follow-up of 11.8 y, 1103 cases of dementia (including 385 AD and 87 cases of MCI) were recorded. U-shaped associations were observed between choline intake and dementia and AD. Participants in the 2nd quartile of total choline intake had lower risks than those in the lowest quartile, with HR of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.96) for dementia and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.00) for AD. Moderate intake of choline derivative, including free choline (HR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.65, 0.92), phosphatidylcholine (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.98), sphingomyelin (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.98) and glycerophosphocholine (HR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.00), were associated with a 17%–23% lower odds of dementia. Additionally, moderate total choline intake was associated with an 8%–13% lower odds of poor cognitive performance in visual attention (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99), fluid intelligence (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.92), and complex processing speed (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.95).

Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings suggest that moderate dietary choline intake, ranging from 332.89 mg/d to 353.93 mg/d, is associated with lower odds of dementia and better cognitive performance.
目的探索英国生物库队列中膳食胆碱摄入量与痴呆症、阿尔茨海默病(AD)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)发病率及当前认知能力之间的关系:根据 24 小时膳食回忆将膳食胆碱摄入量分为四等分,单位为毫克/天。痴呆症、注意力缺失症和 MCI 的诊断是通过 ICD-9/10 编码确定的。目前的认知能力通过计算机触摸屏界面进行评估。在对社会人口学因素、饮食和生活方式行为以及合并症进行调整后,采用考克斯比例危险回归、逻辑回归和限制性三次样条来分析胆碱摄入量与痴呆症或认知能力之间的关系:125 594 名参与者(55.8% 为女性)的基线平均年龄为 56.1 岁(范围:40 至 70 岁),中位随访时间为 11.8 年,其中有 1 103 例痴呆(包括 385 例 AD)和 87 例 MCI。在胆碱摄入量与痴呆症和注意力缺失症之间发现了U型关系。总胆碱摄入量处于第二四分位数的参与者与处于最低四分位数的参与者相比风险较低,痴呆症的HR为0.80(95% CI:0.67,0.96),注意力缺失症的HR为0.76(0.58,1.00)。适量摄入胆碱衍生物,包括游离胆碱(HR,0.77;95%CI,0.65,0.92)、磷脂酰胆碱(0.82;0.68,0.98)、鞘磷脂(0.82;0.69,0.98)和甘油磷脂酰胆碱(0.83;0.70,1.00),与痴呆症发生几率降低17%至23%有关。此外,总胆碱摄入量适中与视觉注意力(OR, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.86, 0.99)、流体智力(0.87; 0.82, 0.92)和复杂处理速度(0.90; 0.84, 0.95)认知能力差的几率降低8%至13%有关:总之,我们的研究结果表明,从膳食中摄入适量的胆碱(332.89 毫克/天至 353.93 毫克/天)可降低痴呆症的发病几率并改善认知能力。
{"title":"Association of dietary choline intake with incidence of dementia, Alzheimer disease, and mild cognitive impairment: a large population-based prospective cohort study","authors":"Ying-ying Niu ,&nbsp;Hao-yu Yan ,&nbsp;Jian-feng Zhong ,&nbsp;Zhi-quan Diao ,&nbsp;Jing Li ,&nbsp;Cheng-ping Li ,&nbsp;Lian-hong Chen ,&nbsp;Wen-qi Huang ,&nbsp;Miao Xu ,&nbsp;Zhi-tong Xu ,&nbsp;Xiao-feng Liang ,&nbsp;Zhi-hao Li ,&nbsp;Dan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Choline, an essential nutrient, plays a critical role in cognition, and may help prevent dementia and mild cognitive impairment. However, studies on dietary choline and its derivatives for preventing these conditions are limited and inconsistent.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to explore the associations between dietary choline intake and the incidence of dementia, Alzheimer disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and current cognitive performance in the United Kingdom Biobank cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Dietary choline intake was categorized into quartiles of consumption based on 24-h dietary recalls, with units expressed as milligrams per day. Diagnoses of dementia, AD, and MCI were identified using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9/10) codes. Current cognitive performance was assessed via the computerized touchscreen interface. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, dietary and lifestyle behaviors, and comorbid conditions, Cox proportional hazards regression, logistic regression, and restricted cubic splines were used to analyze the association between choline intake and dementia or cognitive performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 125,594 participants (55.8% female), with a mean age of 56.1 y (range: 40–70 years) at baseline and a median follow-up of 11.8 y, 1103 cases of dementia (including 385 AD and 87 cases of MCI) were recorded. U-shaped associations were observed between choline intake and dementia and AD. Participants in the 2nd quartile of total choline intake had lower risks than those in the lowest quartile, with HR of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.96) for dementia and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.00) for AD. Moderate intake of choline derivative, including free choline (HR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.65, 0.92), phosphatidylcholine (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.98), sphingomyelin (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.98) and glycerophosphocholine (HR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.00), were associated with a 17%–23% lower odds of dementia. Additionally, moderate total choline intake was associated with an 8%–13% lower odds of poor cognitive performance in visual attention (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99), fluid intelligence (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.92), and complex processing speed (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.95).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, our findings suggest that moderate dietary choline intake, ranging from 332.89 mg/d to 353.93 mg/d, is associated with lower odds of dementia and better cognitive performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Imprecision nutrition? Intraindividual variability of glucose responses to duplicate presented meals in adults without diabetes 不精确的营养?非糖尿病成年人对重复提供的食物的葡萄糖反应的个体差异性。
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.007
Aaron Hengist, Jude Anthony Ong, Katherine McNeel, Juen Guo, Kevin D Hall

Background

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are used to characterize postprandial glucose responses and provide personalized dietary advice to minimize glucose excursions. The efficacy of such advice depends on reliable glucose responses.

Objectives

To explore within-subject variability of CGM responses to duplicate presented meals in an inpatient setting.

Methods

CGM data were collected from two inpatient feeding studies in 30 participants without diabetes, capturing 1189 responses to duplicate meals presented ∼1 wk apart from four dietary patterns. One study used two different CGMs (Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro and Dexcom G4 Platinum) whereas the other study used only Dexcom. We calculated the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for glucose for each 2-h postmeal period and compared within-subject, within-CGM responses to duplicate presented meals using linear correlations, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland–Altman analyses. Individual variability of interstitial glucose responses to duplicate meals were also compared with different meals using standard deviations (SDs).

Results

There were weak-to-moderate positive linear correlations between within-subject iAUCs for duplicate meals [Abbott r = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38, 0.54, P < 0.0001 and Dexcom r = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.50, P < 0.0001], with low within-participant reliability indicated by ICC (Abbott 0.28, Dexcom 0.17). Bland–Altman analyses indicated wide limits of agreement (LoA) (Abbott −29.8 to 28.4 mg/dL and Dexcom −29.4 to 32.1 mg/dL) but small bias of mean iAUCs for duplicate meals (Abbott −0.7 mg/dL and Dexcom 1.3 mg/dL). The individual variability of interstitial glucose responses to duplicate meals was similar to that of different meals evaluated each diet week for both Abbott [SDweek1 11.7 mg/dL (compared with duplicate P = 0.01), SDweek2 10.6 mg/dL (P = 0.43), and SDduplicate 10.1 mg/dL] and Dexcom [SDweek1 10.9 mg/dL (P = 0.62), SDweek2 11.0 mg/dL (P = 0.73), and SDduplicate 11.2 mg/dL].

Conclusions

Individual postprandial CGM responses to duplicate meals were highly variable in adults without diabetes. Personalized diet advice on the basis of CGM measurements requires more reliable methods involving aggregated repeated measurements.
This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03407053 and NCT03878108.
背景:连续血糖监测仪(cgm)用于描述餐后血糖反应,并提供个性化的饮食建议,以尽量减少血糖漂移。这种建议的有效性取决于可靠的葡萄糖反应。目的:探讨住院患者对重复提供的膳食的CGM反应在受试者内部的可变性。方法:从30名非糖尿病患者的两项住院喂养研究中收集了CGM数据,捕获了1189人对四种饮食模式中重复饮食1周的反应。一项研究使用两种不同的cgm(雅培Freestyle Libre Pro和Dexcom G4 Platinum),而另一项研究仅使用Dexcom。我们计算了餐后每2小时葡萄糖的增量曲线下面积(iAUC),并使用线性相关性、类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析比较了受试者内、cgm内对重复膳食的反应。使用标准偏差(SDs)比较了不同膳食对重复膳食间质葡萄糖反应的个体差异。结果:受试者内重复饮食的iauc之间存在弱至中度的正线性相关[Abbott r = 0.46, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.38, 0.54, P < 0.0001; Dexcom r = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.50, P < 0.0001], ICC显示出较低的受试者内信度(Abbott 0.28, Dexcom 0.17)。Bland-Altman分析表明,一致性限宽(LoA)(雅培-29.8至28.4 mg/dL和Dexcom -29.4至32.1 mg/dL),但重复餐的平均iauc偏差较小(雅培-0.7 mg/dL和Dexcom 1.3 mg/dL)。对于雅培[SDweek1 11.7 mg/dL(与重复餐相比P = 0.01), SDweek2 10.6 mg/dL (P = 0.43), SDduplicate 10.1 mg/dL]和Dexcom [SDweek1 10.9 mg/dL (P = 0.62), SDweek2 11.0 mg/dL (P = 0.73), SDduplicate 11.2 mg/dL],重复餐对间质葡萄糖反应的个体差异与每个饮食周评估的不同膳食相似。结论:在没有糖尿病的成年人中,个体餐后CGM对重复膳食的反应是高度可变的。基于CGM测量的个性化饮食建议需要更可靠的方法,包括汇总重复测量。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov注册为NCT03407053和NCT03878108。
{"title":"Imprecision nutrition? Intraindividual variability of glucose responses to duplicate presented meals in adults without diabetes","authors":"Aaron Hengist,&nbsp;Jude Anthony Ong,&nbsp;Katherine McNeel,&nbsp;Juen Guo,&nbsp;Kevin D Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are used to characterize postprandial glucose responses and provide personalized dietary advice to minimize glucose excursions. The efficacy of such advice depends on reliable glucose responses.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To explore within-subject variability of CGM responses to duplicate presented meals in an inpatient setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CGM data were collected from two inpatient feeding studies in 30 participants without diabetes, capturing 1189 responses to duplicate meals presented ∼1 wk apart from four dietary patterns. One study used two different CGMs (Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro and Dexcom G4 Platinum) whereas the other study used only Dexcom. We calculated the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for glucose for each 2-h postmeal period and compared within-subject, within-CGM responses to duplicate presented meals using linear correlations, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland–Altman analyses. Individual variability of interstitial glucose responses to duplicate meals were also compared with different meals using standard deviations (SDs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were weak-to-moderate positive linear correlations between within-subject iAUCs for duplicate meals [Abbott <em>r</em> = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38, 0.54, <em>P &lt;</em> 0.0001 and Dexcom <em>r =</em> 0.45, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.50, <em>P &lt;</em> 0.0001], with low within-participant reliability indicated by ICC (Abbott 0.28, Dexcom 0.17). Bland–Altman analyses indicated wide limits of agreement (LoA) (Abbott −29.8 to 28.4 mg/dL and Dexcom −29.4 to 32.1 mg/dL) but small bias of mean iAUCs for duplicate meals (Abbott −0.7 mg/dL and Dexcom 1.3 mg/dL). The individual variability of interstitial glucose responses to duplicate meals was similar to that of different meals evaluated each diet week for both Abbott [SD<sub>week1</sub> 11.7 mg/dL (compared with duplicate <em>P =</em> 0.01), SD<sub>week2</sub> 10.6 mg/dL (<em>P =</em> 0.43), and SD<sub>duplicate</sub> 10.1 mg/dL] and Dexcom [SD<sub>week1</sub> 10.9 mg/dL (<em>P =</em> 0.62), SD<sub>week2</sub> 11.0 mg/dL (<em>P =</em> 0.73), and SD<sub>duplicate</sub> 11.2 mg/dL].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individual postprandial CGM responses to duplicate meals were highly variable in adults without diabetes. Personalized diet advice on the basis of CGM measurements requires more reliable methods involving aggregated repeated measurements.</div><div>This trial was registered at <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> as NCT03407053 and NCT03878108.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliability and reproducibility of systematic reviews informing the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: a pilot study 为《2020-2025 年美国人膳食指南》提供信息的系统综述的可靠性和再现性:一项试点研究。
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.013
Alexandra M Bodnaruc , Hassan Khan , Nicole Shaver , Alexandria Bennett , Yiu Lin Wong , Catherine Gracey , Valentina Ly , Beverley Shea , Julian Little , Melissa Brouwers , Dennis Bier , David Moher

Background

Although high-quality nutrition systematic reviews (SRs) are important for clinical decision making, there remains debate on their methodological quality and reporting transparency.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of a sample of SRs produced by the Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team to inform the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs).

Methods

We evaluated a sample of 8 SRs from the DGA dietary patterns subcommittee for methodological quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool and for reporting transparency using the PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA literature search extension (PRISMA-S) checklists. We assessed the quality and reproducibility of the original search strategy of one selected SR using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies checklist. The reporting transparency of the SR’s narrative data synthesis was assessed using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) checklist. Interpretation bias was evaluated using existing spin bias classifications in systematic reviews.

Results

The AMSTAR 2 assessment identified critical methodological weaknesses, and all included SRs were judged to be of critically low quality. Overall, 74% of the PRISMA 2020 checklist items and 63% of the PRISMA-S checklist items were satisfactorily fulfilled. We identified several errors and inconsistencies in the search strategy and could not reproduce searches within a 10% margin of the original results. The SWiM assessment identified concerns regarding the reporting transparency of the narrative data synthesis, but the spin bias assessment revealed no evidence of interpretation bias.

Conclusions

Several methodological quality and reporting concerns were identified, which could lead to reliability and reproducibility issues should a full reproduction attempt be made. However, additional research is needed to confirm the impact of these findings on conclusions statements and their generalizability across the NESR team SRs.
This study was registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ns6a9/).
背景:尽管高质量的营养系统评价(SRs)对临床决策很重要,但其方法质量和报告透明度仍存在争议。目的:本研究的目的是评估营养证据系统评价(NESR)团队制作的SRs样本的可靠性和可重复性,以为2020-2025年美国人膳食指南(DGAs)提供信息。方法:我们使用多重系统评价评估2 (AMSTAR 2)工具评估了来自DGA饮食模式小组委员会的8份SRs样本的方学质量,并使用PRISMA 2020和PRISMA文献检索扩展(PRISMA- s)清单评估了报告的透明度。我们使用电子检索策略清单的同行评议评估了一个选定的SR的原始检索策略的质量和可重复性。使用无元分析综合(SWiM)检查表评估SR叙事数据综合的报告透明度。使用系统评价中现有的自旋偏倚分类来评估解释偏倚。结果:AMSTAR 2评估确定了关键的方法学缺陷,所有纳入的SRs被判定为质量极低。总体而言,74%的PRISMA 2020检查表项目和63%的PRISMA- s检查表项目得到了满意的满足。我们在搜索策略中发现了一些错误和不一致之处,并且无法在原始结果的10%范围内重现搜索。SWiM评估确定了对叙事数据综合报告透明度的关注,但自旋偏差评估没有发现解释偏差的证据。结论:确定了几个方法学质量和报告问题,如果进行完整的复制尝试,可能导致可靠性和可重复性问题。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现对结论陈述的影响及其在NESR团队sr中的普遍性。该研究已在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/ns6a9/)上注册。
{"title":"Reliability and reproducibility of systematic reviews informing the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: a pilot study","authors":"Alexandra M Bodnaruc ,&nbsp;Hassan Khan ,&nbsp;Nicole Shaver ,&nbsp;Alexandria Bennett ,&nbsp;Yiu Lin Wong ,&nbsp;Catherine Gracey ,&nbsp;Valentina Ly ,&nbsp;Beverley Shea ,&nbsp;Julian Little ,&nbsp;Melissa Brouwers ,&nbsp;Dennis Bier ,&nbsp;David Moher","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although high-quality nutrition systematic reviews (SRs) are important for clinical decision making, there remains debate on their methodological quality and reporting transparency.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objective of this study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of a sample of SRs produced by the Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team to inform the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluated a sample of 8 SRs from the DGA dietary patterns subcommittee for methodological quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool and for reporting transparency using the PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA literature search extension (PRISMA-S) checklists. We assessed the quality and reproducibility of the original search strategy of one selected SR using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies checklist. The reporting transparency of the SR’s narrative data synthesis was assessed using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) checklist. Interpretation bias was evaluated using existing spin bias classifications in systematic reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AMSTAR 2 assessment identified critical methodological weaknesses, and all included SRs were judged to be of critically low quality. Overall, 74% of the PRISMA 2020 checklist items and 63% of the PRISMA-S checklist items were satisfactorily fulfilled. We identified several errors and inconsistencies in the search strategy and could not reproduce searches within a 10% margin of the original results. The SWiM assessment identified concerns regarding the reporting transparency of the narrative data synthesis, but the spin bias assessment revealed no evidence of interpretation bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Several methodological quality and reporting concerns were identified, which could lead to reliability and reproducibility issues should a full reproduction attempt be made. However, additional research is needed to confirm the impact of these findings on conclusions statements and their generalizability across the NESR team SRs.</div><div>This study was registered in the Open Science Framework (<span><span>https://osf.io/ns6a9/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 111-124"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations between dietary fibers and gut microbiome composition in the EDIA longitudinal infant cohort EDIA 婴儿纵向队列中膳食纤维与肠道微生物组组成之间的关系。
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.011
Marianne K Lalli , Tuuli EI Salo , Leena Hakola , Mikael Knip , Suvi M Virtanen , Tommi Vatanen

Background

The infant gut microbiome undergoes rapid changes in the first year of life, supporting normal development and long-term health. Although diet shapes this process, the role of fibers in complementary foods on gut microbiome maturation is poorly understood.

Objectives

We explored how the transition from human milk to fibers in complementary foods shapes the taxonomic and functional maturation of the gut microbiome within the first year of life.

Methods

We assessed the longitudinal and cross-sectional development of infant gut microbiomes (N = 68 infants) and metabolomes (N = 33 infants) using linear mixed models to uncover their associations to dietary fibers and their food sources. Fiber intakes were assessed with 3-d food records (months 3, 6, 9, and 12) relying on CODEX-compliant fiber fraction values, and questionnaires tracked the overall complementary food introduction. Bacterial species were identified and quantified via MetaPhlAn2 from metagenomic data, and metabolomic profiles were obtained using 4 LC-MS methods.

Results

We identified 176 complementary food fiber-bacterial species associations. First plant-based fibers associated with microbiota compositions similar to breastfeeding, and further associated with aromatic amino acid-derived metabolites, including 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (total dietary fiber – complementary foods (g) – β = 3.50, CI: 2.48, 4.52, P = 6.53 × 10–5). Distinct fibers from different food categories showed unique associations with specific bacterial taxa. Key species, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitznii, associated with oat fibers (g/MJ, β = 2.18, confidence interval: 1.36, 2.84, P = 6.12 × 10–6), reflective of maturing microbial communities. Fiber intake during weaning associated with shifts in metabolite profiles, including immunomodulatory metabolites, with fiber effects observed in a source- and timing-dependent manner, implicated in gradual microbiome diversification.

Conclusions

Introducing complementary dietary fibers during the weaning period supports gut microbiome diversification and stabilization. Even minor dietary variations shows significant associations with microbial taxa and functions from the onset of weaning, highlighting the importance of infant dietary recommendations that support the gut microbiome maturation during early life.
This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as registration number NCT01735123.
背景:婴儿肠道微生物群在出生后的第一年会发生快速变化,从而支持正常发育和长期健康。虽然饮食影响着这一过程,但人们对辅食中的纤维对肠道微生物组成熟的作用却知之甚少:我们探讨了从母乳到辅食中纤维的过渡如何影响出生后第一年内肠道微生物组的分类和功能成熟:我们使用线性混合模型评估了婴儿肠道微生物组(68 名婴儿)和代谢组(33 名婴儿)的纵向和横向发展情况,以揭示它们与膳食纤维及其食物来源之间的关联。根据符合 CODEX 标准的纤维成分值,通过 3 天的食物记录(3、6、9、12 个月)对纤维摄入量进行评估,并通过问卷调查跟踪辅食添加的总体情况。通过元基因组数据中的 MetaPhlAn2 对细菌种类进行了鉴定和量化,并使用四种 LC-MS 方法获得了代谢组图谱:结果:我们确定了 176 种辅助食品纤维与细菌物种的关联。首先,植物性纤维与母乳喂养的微生物群组成相似,并进一步与芳香族氨基酸代谢物(包括 5-羟基吲哚乙酸)相关(膳食纤维总量 - 辅助食品(克) - β=3.50, CI 2.48-4.52, p=6.53x10-5)。不同食物类别中的不同纤维与特定细菌类群有独特的联系。燕麦纤维(克/兆焦耳,β=2.18,CI 1.36-2.84,p=6.12x10-6)与粪便杆菌(Faecalibacterium prausnitznii)等关键物种相关,反映了微生物群落的成熟。断奶期间纤维的摄入与代谢物谱的变化有关,包括免疫调节代谢物,纤维的影响以来源和时间依赖的方式观察到,这与微生物群逐渐多样化有关:结论:在断奶期引入补充性膳食纤维有助于肠道微生物组的多样化和稳定。从断奶开始,即使是微小的膳食变化也显示出与微生物类群和功能的显著关联,这凸显了在生命早期支持肠道微生物组成熟的婴儿膳食建议的重要性:临床试验注册号:Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01735123。注册日期:2012 年 11 月 24 日:https://www.Clinicaltrials:gov/ct2/show/NCT01735123。
{"title":"Associations between dietary fibers and gut microbiome composition in the EDIA longitudinal infant cohort","authors":"Marianne K Lalli ,&nbsp;Tuuli EI Salo ,&nbsp;Leena Hakola ,&nbsp;Mikael Knip ,&nbsp;Suvi M Virtanen ,&nbsp;Tommi Vatanen","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The infant gut microbiome undergoes rapid changes in the first year of life, supporting normal development and long-term health. Although diet shapes this process, the role of fibers in complementary foods on gut microbiome maturation is poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We explored how the transition from human milk to fibers in complementary foods shapes the taxonomic and functional maturation of the gut microbiome within the first year of life.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We assessed the longitudinal and cross-sectional development of infant gut microbiomes (<em>N</em> = 68 infants) and metabolomes (<em>N</em> = 33 infants) using linear mixed models to uncover their associations to dietary fibers and their food sources. Fiber intakes were assessed with 3-d food records (months 3, 6, 9, and 12) relying on CODEX-compliant fiber fraction values, and questionnaires tracked the overall complementary food introduction. Bacterial species were identified and quantified via MetaPhlAn2 from metagenomic data, and metabolomic profiles were obtained using 4 LC-MS methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 176 complementary food fiber-bacterial species associations. First plant-based fibers associated with microbiota compositions similar to breastfeeding, and further associated with aromatic amino acid-derived metabolites, including 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (total dietary fiber – complementary foods (g) – β = 3.50, CI: 2.48, 4.52, <em>P</em> = 6.53 × 10<sup>–5</sup>). Distinct fibers from different food categories showed unique associations with specific bacterial taxa. Key species, such as <em>Faecalibacterium prausnitznii</em>, associated with oat fibers (g/MJ, β = 2.18, confidence interval: 1.36, 2.84, <em>P</em> = 6.12 × 10<sup>–6</sup>), reflective of maturing microbial communities. Fiber intake during weaning associated with shifts in metabolite profiles, including immunomodulatory metabolites, with fiber effects observed in a source- and timing-dependent manner, implicated in gradual microbiome diversification.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Introducing complementary dietary fibers during the weaning period supports gut microbiome diversification and stabilization. Even minor dietary variations shows significant associations with microbial taxa and functions from the onset of weaning, highlighting the importance of infant dietary recommendations that support the gut microbiome maturation during early life.</div><div>This trial was registered at <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> as registration number NCT01735123.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 83-99"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747200/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Dietary Guidelines for Americans—is the evidence bar too low or too high? 《美国人膳食指南》——证据门槛太低还是太高?
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.013
Dariush Mozaffarian
{"title":"The Dietary Guidelines for Americans—is the evidence bar too low or too high?","authors":"Dariush Mozaffarian","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142822937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses: garbage in → garbage out 预测血糖反应的个性化营养:垃圾进→垃圾出。
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.004
Thomas MS Wolever
{"title":"Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses: garbage in → garbage out","authors":"Thomas MS Wolever","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.11.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adulthood dietary and lifestyle patterns and risk of breast cancer: Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review 成年期饮食和生活方式与乳腺癌风险:全球癌症更新计划(CUP Global)系统文献综述。
IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.003
Jadwiga Konieczna , Alice Chaplin , Indira Paz-Graniel , Helen Croker , Nerea Becerra-Tomás , Georgios Markozannes , Konstantinos K Tsilidis , Laure Dossus , Esther M Gonzalez-Gil , Yikyung Park , John Krebs , Matty P Weijenberg , Monica L Baskin , Ellen Copson , Sarah J Lewis , Jacob C Seidell , Rajiv Chowdhury , Lynette Hill , Doris SM Chan , Dora Romaguera

Background

An increasing number of studies in recent years investigate various dietary and lifestyle patterns and associated breast cancer (BC) risk.

Objectives

This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize and grade the evidence on dietary and lifestyle patterns and BC risk.

Methods

Databases were systematically searched up to 31 March, 2022, for evidence from randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies on adherence to a dietary pattern alone or in combination with lifestyle behaviors and incidence of or mortality from primary BC in adult females. Findings in all, premenopausal, and postmenopausal females were descriptively synthesized instead of meta-analyzed due to patterns heterogeneity. An independent Global Cancer Update Programme Expert Panel graded the strength of the evidence.

Results

A total of 84 publications were included. Results for patterns reflecting both a healthy diet and lifestyle were more consistent than for patterns that included diet only. There was strong-probable evidence that a priori World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) and American Cancer Society (ACS) dietary and lifestyle scores may reduce BC risk in all and postmenopausal females, whereas in premenopausal females, less evidence was found contributing to limited-suggestive grade. There was also a limited-suggestive evidence that adherence to the Healthy Lifestyle Index and other diet and lifestyle scores may reduce BC risk in postmenopausal females; a posteriori Western/Meat/Alcohol dietary patterns may increase BC risk in postmenopausal females; and Prudent/Vegetarian/Mediterranean dietary patterns may reduce BC risk in all females. For the remaining patterns, evidence was graded as limited-no conclusions.

Conclusions

Advice to adopt combined aspects of a healthy diet and lifestyle according to WCRF/AICR and ACS scores, encouraging a healthy weight, physical activity, alcohol and smoking avoidance, and a healthy diet rich in fruits, vegetables, (whole)grains and cereals and discouraging red and processed meat, can be proposed to females to lower BC risk.
This review was registered at PROSPERO as ID CRD42021270129 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021270129) on 28 August, 2021, and further updated on 4 May, 2022, in order to extend the search period.
背景:近年来,越来越多的研究调查了各种饮食和生活方式与乳腺癌(BC)的相关风险:本研究旨在对有关饮食和生活方式与乳腺癌风险的证据进行全面综合和分级:方法:对截至 2022 年 3 月 31 日的数据库进行了系统检索,以获取有关成年女性单独或结合生活方式行为坚持某种饮食模式与原发性乳腺癌发病率或死亡率的 RCT 和前瞻性队列研究证据。由于模式的异质性,对所有女性、绝经前女性和绝经后女性的研究结果进行了描述性综合分析,而不是荟萃分析。一个独立的全球癌症更新计划专家小组对证据的强度进行了分级:结果:共纳入 84 篇出版物。与仅包括饮食的模式相比,同时反映健康饮食和生活方式的模式的结果更为一致。有很强的证据表明,世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所(WCRF/AICR)和美国癌症协会(ACS)的先验饮食和生活方式评分可降低所有女性和绝经后女性的BC风险,而对于绝经前女性,发现的证据较少,因此属于有限提示等级。还有有限提示性证据表明,坚持健康生活方式指数及其他饮食和生活方式评分可降低绝经后女性的乳腺癌风险;后天西式/肉类/酒精饮食模式可增加绝经后女性的乳腺癌风险;谨慎/素食/地中海饮食模式可降低所有女性的乳腺癌风险。其余饮食模式的证据有限,未得出结论:结论:可建议女性根据 WCRF/AICR 和 ACS 评分综合采用健康饮食和生活方式,鼓励健康体重、体育锻炼、避免酗酒和吸烟,以及富含水果、蔬菜、(全)谷物和谷类的健康饮食,不鼓励食用红肉和加工肉类,以降低 BC 风险。本综述于 2021 年 8 月 28 日在 PROSPERO 注册为 ID CRD42021270129 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021270129),并于 2022 年 5 月 4 日进一步更新,以延长检索期。
{"title":"Adulthood dietary and lifestyle patterns and risk of breast cancer: Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review","authors":"Jadwiga Konieczna ,&nbsp;Alice Chaplin ,&nbsp;Indira Paz-Graniel ,&nbsp;Helen Croker ,&nbsp;Nerea Becerra-Tomás ,&nbsp;Georgios Markozannes ,&nbsp;Konstantinos K Tsilidis ,&nbsp;Laure Dossus ,&nbsp;Esther M Gonzalez-Gil ,&nbsp;Yikyung Park ,&nbsp;John Krebs ,&nbsp;Matty P Weijenberg ,&nbsp;Monica L Baskin ,&nbsp;Ellen Copson ,&nbsp;Sarah J Lewis ,&nbsp;Jacob C Seidell ,&nbsp;Rajiv Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Lynette Hill ,&nbsp;Doris SM Chan ,&nbsp;Dora Romaguera","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An increasing number of studies in recent years investigate various dietary and lifestyle patterns and associated breast cancer (BC) risk.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize and grade the evidence on dietary and lifestyle patterns and BC risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Databases were systematically searched up to 31 March, 2022, for evidence from randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies on adherence to a dietary pattern alone or in combination with lifestyle behaviors and incidence of or mortality from primary BC in adult females. Findings in all, premenopausal, and postmenopausal females were descriptively synthesized instead of meta-analyzed due to patterns heterogeneity. An independent Global Cancer Update Programme Expert Panel graded the strength of the evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 84 publications were included. Results for patterns reflecting both a healthy diet and lifestyle were more consistent than for patterns that included diet only. There was strong-probable evidence that a priori World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) and American Cancer Society (ACS) dietary and lifestyle scores may reduce BC risk in all and postmenopausal females, whereas in premenopausal females, less evidence was found contributing to limited-suggestive grade. There was also a limited-suggestive evidence that adherence to the Healthy Lifestyle Index and other diet and lifestyle scores may reduce BC risk in postmenopausal females; a posteriori Western/Meat/Alcohol dietary patterns may increase BC risk in postmenopausal females; and Prudent/Vegetarian/Mediterranean dietary patterns may reduce BC risk in all females. For the remaining patterns, evidence was graded as limited-no conclusions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Advice to adopt combined aspects of a healthy diet and lifestyle according to WCRF/AICR and ACS scores, encouraging a healthy weight, physical activity, alcohol and smoking avoidance, and a healthy diet rich in fruits, vegetables, (whole)grains and cereals and discouraging red and processed meat, can be proposed to females to lower BC risk.</div><div>This review was registered at PROSPERO as ID CRD42021270129 (<span><span>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021270129</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) on 28 August, 2021, and further updated on 4 May, 2022, in order to extend the search period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 1","pages":"Pages 14-31"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747198/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1