首页 > 最新文献

Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook最新文献

英文 中文
Sibbern’s Anticipations of Kierkegaard’s Polemic against the Hegelians: The Critique of Abstraction 西伯恩对克尔凯郭尔反黑格尔论战的预见:《抽象批判》
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2021-08-11 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2021-0015
Jon Stewart
Abstract The present article argues that the philosopher Frederik Christian Sibbern played a fairly substantive role in the development of what has come to be known as Kierkegaard’s critique of Hegel. Specifically, Sibbern had already worked out some of the key elements of Kierkegaard’s critique that culminates in the Concluding Unscientific Postscript. This is demonstrated by means of an analysis of two works by Sibbern which are important for his critical discussion of Hegel’s philosophy: Remarks and Investigations Primarily Concerning Hegel’s Philosophy from 1838, and On the Concept, Nature and Essence of Philosophy: A Presentation of Philosophy’s Propaedeutic from 1843.
本文认为,哲学家弗雷德里克·克里斯蒂安·西伯恩在克尔凯郭尔对黑格尔的批判的发展中发挥了相当重要的作用。具体地说,西伯恩已经提出了克尔凯郭尔批判的一些关键要素,这些要素在结论性的非科学附言中达到高潮。这可以通过对西伯恩的两部著作的分析来证明,这两部著作对他对黑格尔哲学的批判性讨论很重要:《1838年关于黑格尔哲学的主要评论和研究》和《论哲学的概念、本质和本质:1843年哲学的陈述》。
{"title":"Sibbern’s Anticipations of Kierkegaard’s Polemic against the Hegelians: The Critique of Abstraction","authors":"Jon Stewart","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2021-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2021-0015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present article argues that the philosopher Frederik Christian Sibbern played a fairly substantive role in the development of what has come to be known as Kierkegaard’s critique of Hegel. Specifically, Sibbern had already worked out some of the key elements of Kierkegaard’s critique that culminates in the Concluding Unscientific Postscript. This is demonstrated by means of an analysis of two works by Sibbern which are important for his critical discussion of Hegel’s philosophy: Remarks and Investigations Primarily Concerning Hegel’s Philosophy from 1838, and On the Concept, Nature and Essence of Philosophy: A Presentation of Philosophy’s Propaedeutic from 1843.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74809627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lukács and Kierkegaard: Decadence or Despair Lukács和克尔凯郭尔:颓废还是绝望
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2021-08-11 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2021-0020
A. Hannay
Abstract A distrust of focus on subjectivity and the individual provoked by his meeting with Sartrean existentialism led György Lukács to turn his early but qualified admiration of Søren Kierkegaard into an accusation of fostering a bourgeois culture of the kind Kierkegaard is usually thought to have opposed. Not every Marxian thinker has been equally wary of subjectivity, but all have found in Kierkegaard a crucial absence of concern for human exploitation within a context of natural scarcity. However, a more measured reading suggests a case for resolving the need to choose between Lukács’s insistence on “spirit” as a collective notion and Kierkegaard’s as cultivation of a trans-historically oriented, self-stabilizing social will.
由于与萨特存在主义的相遇,György Lukács对主体性和个人的关注产生了不信任,这导致György Lukács将他早期对索伦·克尔凯郭尔的有限钦佩转变为对克尔凯郭尔通常被认为是反对的那种资产阶级文化的指责。并非每一位马克思主义思想家都对主体性持同样的警惕态度,但所有人都发现,克尔凯郭尔在自然匮乏的背景下,对人类剥削缺乏关注,这一点至关重要。然而,更慎重的解读表明,解决在Lukács坚持“精神”作为一种集体概念和克尔凯郭尔作为一种跨历史导向、自我稳定的社会意志的培养之间做出选择的必要性。
{"title":"Lukács and Kierkegaard: Decadence or Despair","authors":"A. Hannay","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2021-0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2021-0020","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A distrust of focus on subjectivity and the individual provoked by his meeting with Sartrean existentialism led György Lukács to turn his early but qualified admiration of Søren Kierkegaard into an accusation of fostering a bourgeois culture of the kind Kierkegaard is usually thought to have opposed. Not every Marxian thinker has been equally wary of subjectivity, but all have found in Kierkegaard a crucial absence of concern for human exploitation within a context of natural scarcity. However, a more measured reading suggests a case for resolving the need to choose between Lukács’s insistence on “spirit” as a collective notion and Kierkegaard’s as cultivation of a trans-historically oriented, self-stabilizing social will.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86931949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Human Striving and Absolute Reliance upon God: A Kierkegaardian Paradox 人类的奋斗与对上帝的绝对依赖:一个克尔凯郭尔式的悖论
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2021-08-11 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2021-0007
Lee C. Barrett
Abstract Kierkegaard’s texts suggest countervailing construals of the respective roles of divine and human agency in an individual’s pursuit of blessedness. Kierkegaard paradoxically suggests that the individual must depend entirely on grace for the birth and development of faith, and at the same time actively cultivate faithful dispositions and passions. But Kierkegaard did not espouse Calvinistic divine determinism, or Pelagian autonomous human agency, or the Arminian cooperation of the two. For Kierkegaard, the ostensible paradox of grace and free will is not a cognitive conundrum but is rather a challenge to integrate faith as a gift and faith as a task.
克尔凯郭尔的文本提出了在个人追求幸福的过程中,神和人的代理各自角色的对立解释。克尔凯郭尔矛盾地提出,个人必须完全依靠恩典来产生和发展信仰,同时积极培养忠诚的性格和激情。但克尔凯郭尔不支持加尔文主义的神决定论,也不支持伯拉纠主义的人类自主能动性,也不支持二者的阿米念主义合作。对于克尔凯郭尔来说,恩典和自由意志表面上的悖论并不是一个认知难题,而是将信仰作为一种礼物和一项任务整合起来的挑战。
{"title":"Human Striving and Absolute Reliance upon God: A Kierkegaardian Paradox","authors":"Lee C. Barrett","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2021-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2021-0007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Kierkegaard’s texts suggest countervailing construals of the respective roles of divine and human agency in an individual’s pursuit of blessedness. Kierkegaard paradoxically suggests that the individual must depend entirely on grace for the birth and development of faith, and at the same time actively cultivate faithful dispositions and passions. But Kierkegaard did not espouse Calvinistic divine determinism, or Pelagian autonomous human agency, or the Arminian cooperation of the two. For Kierkegaard, the ostensible paradox of grace and free will is not a cognitive conundrum but is rather a challenge to integrate faith as a gift and faith as a task.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84380136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On Fear and Trembling’s Motif of the Promise: Faith, Ethics and the Politics of Tragedy 恐惧与颤抖的承诺母题:悲剧的信仰、伦理与政治
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0004
Aaron J. Goldman
Abstract This article interrogates the concepts of faith, the ethical, and tragedy in Fear and Trembling by examining Johannes De Silentio’s allusions to heroic characters. I argue that these heroes are emblematic of faith or tragedy through their orientation to a promise in their respective mythic narratives. Abraham’s faith in the covenant with God commits him to the reconcilability of virtue and the good life, while the tragic heroes’ commitments to the ethical reveal their inability to transcend the (tragic) presumption that virtue and the good life are ultimately incommensurable. I conclude by sketching a politics corresponding to De Silentio’s conception of tragedy.
摘要本文通过考察约翰内斯·德·塞伦蒂奥对英雄人物的典故,对《恐惧与颤抖》中的信仰、伦理和悲剧概念进行了探讨。我认为这些英雄是信仰或悲剧的象征,因为他们在各自的神话叙事中都指向一个承诺。亚伯拉罕对与上帝之约的信仰使他相信美德与美好生活的可调和性,而悲剧英雄对伦理的承诺则揭示了他们无法超越美德与美好生活最终不可通约性的(悲剧)假设。最后,我概述了一种与德·沉默的悲剧概念相对应的政治。
{"title":"On Fear and Trembling’s Motif of the Promise: Faith, Ethics and the Politics of Tragedy","authors":"Aaron J. Goldman","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0004","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article interrogates the concepts of faith, the ethical, and tragedy in Fear and Trembling by examining Johannes De Silentio’s allusions to heroic characters. I argue that these heroes are emblematic of faith or tragedy through their orientation to a promise in their respective mythic narratives. Abraham’s faith in the covenant with God commits him to the reconcilability of virtue and the good life, while the tragic heroes’ commitments to the ethical reveal their inability to transcend the (tragic) presumption that virtue and the good life are ultimately incommensurable. I conclude by sketching a politics corresponding to De Silentio’s conception of tragedy.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74907368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Mutiny of the Pseudonyms in the Kierkegaardian Authorship 克尔凯郭尔笔下笔名的叛变
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0014
Paulo Henrique Lopes
Abstract The essay emphasizes the unsolvable tension between activity and passivity implied in Kierkegaard’s reduplication as an author of authors. To characterize the different approaches to pseudonymity, I will use the term Halvbefaren [the inexperienced seaman] to refer to a reading that appeals only to Kierkegaard’s or to the pseudonyms’ authority over the authorship, and Helbefaren [the experienced seaman] to refer to another interpretation that recognizes that unsolvable tension between them. Recurring to the sailing metaphor implicit in these terms that appear in Climacus’ Postscript, I defend the thesis that the pseudonyms open the authorship from within, overcoming Kierkegaard as a usual author, as the only captain of the entire authorship. The mutiny performed by the pseudonyms cannot be resolved by simply transferring the authority to the pseudonyms themselves, and it creates a subjective space in the authorship so it becomes a matter of the experience of the reader.
摘要本文强调了克尔凯郭尔作为作者之作者的重复所隐含的能动性与被动性之间不可解决的张力。为了描述不同的笔名方法,我将使用术语Halvbefaren(没有经验的海员)来指代一种只诉诸克尔凯郭尔或笔名对作者身份的权威的解读,而Helbefaren(有经验的海员)则指代另一种认识到它们之间无法解决的紧张关系的解释。再次提到在克里马库斯的《后记》中所隐含的航海隐喻,我为这个论点辩护,这些假名从内部打开了作者身份,超越了克尔凯郭尔作为一个普通的作者,作为整个作者身份的唯一船长。假名的叛变不能通过简单地将权力转移给假名本身来解决,它在作者身份中创造了一个主观空间,所以它变成了读者体验的问题。
{"title":"The Mutiny of the Pseudonyms in the Kierkegaardian Authorship","authors":"Paulo Henrique Lopes","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0014","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The essay emphasizes the unsolvable tension between activity and passivity implied in Kierkegaard’s reduplication as an author of authors. To characterize the different approaches to pseudonymity, I will use the term Halvbefaren [the inexperienced seaman] to refer to a reading that appeals only to Kierkegaard’s or to the pseudonyms’ authority over the authorship, and Helbefaren [the experienced seaman] to refer to another interpretation that recognizes that unsolvable tension between them. Recurring to the sailing metaphor implicit in these terms that appear in Climacus’ Postscript, I defend the thesis that the pseudonyms open the authorship from within, overcoming Kierkegaard as a usual author, as the only captain of the entire authorship. The mutiny performed by the pseudonyms cannot be resolved by simply transferring the authority to the pseudonyms themselves, and it creates a subjective space in the authorship so it becomes a matter of the experience of the reader.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76596499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Between the Two Ethics: Why Assessor Wilhelm is not a Judge 在两种伦理之间:为什么评估师威廉不是法官
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0002
Viktoras Bachmetjevas
Abstract Although there is a broad agreement among Kierkegaard’s scholars that Assessor Wilhelm is an ethical thinker, the agreement on what kind of ethics his standpoint represents has been much harder to come by. The suggestions range from Schiller to Aristotle and from Kant to Hegel. The article contends that the apparent lack of a coherent ethical theory on Assessor Wilhelm’s part is in fact part of a deliberate ethical strategy. Based on Vigilius Haufniensis’ distinction between first and second ethics, it is argued that Assessor Wilhelm occupies a space in between, in which he attempts to create a dynamic for A in the direction of the so-called second ethics, and this by mainly using ironic means.
虽然克尔凯郭尔的学者们普遍认为威廉是一位伦理学思想家,但对于他的立场所代表的伦理学类型却很难达成一致。这些建议从席勒到亚里士多德,从康德到黑格尔。本文认为,威廉评估员明显缺乏连贯的伦理理论,实际上是一种深思熟虑的伦理策略的一部分。基于乌夫尼乌斯对第一伦理和第二伦理的区分,本文认为威廉占据了一个介于第一伦理和第二伦理之间的空间,他试图为a创造一种向所谓第二伦理方向发展的动力,而这主要是通过讽刺的手段。
{"title":"Between the Two Ethics: Why Assessor Wilhelm is not a Judge","authors":"Viktoras Bachmetjevas","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0002","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although there is a broad agreement among Kierkegaard’s scholars that Assessor Wilhelm is an ethical thinker, the agreement on what kind of ethics his standpoint represents has been much harder to come by. The suggestions range from Schiller to Aristotle and from Kant to Hegel. The article contends that the apparent lack of a coherent ethical theory on Assessor Wilhelm’s part is in fact part of a deliberate ethical strategy. Based on Vigilius Haufniensis’ distinction between first and second ethics, it is argued that Assessor Wilhelm occupies a space in between, in which he attempts to create a dynamic for A in the direction of the so-called second ethics, and this by mainly using ironic means.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84000435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Faust Project in Kierkegaard’s Early Journals 克尔凯郭尔早期日记中的浮士德计划
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0008
Nassim Bravo
Abstract This article offers a detailed and compact account of what might be called Kierkegaard’s Faust project, that is, the collection of notes, bibliographies and reflections on the mythical German necromancer that the young Kierkegaard registered in his various journals and notebooks from the years 1835 – 1837. As is well known, the young writer presumably intended to pen a book or essay about the universal idea represented by Faust. Additionally, I discuss Kierkegaard’s project within the context of the 1830s, the reception of the Faustian myth among his Danish contemporaries such as J.L. Heiberg and H.L. Martensen, and the enthusiasm for Goethe that seized Copenhagen during those years.
本文详细而紧凑地描述了克尔凯郭尔的浮士德计划,即年轻的克尔凯郭尔在1835年至1837年的各种日记和笔记本中记录的关于这位神秘的德国巫师的笔记、参考书目和反思的集合。众所周知,这位年轻的作家大概打算写一本书或一篇关于浮士德所代表的普遍思想的文章。此外,我在19世纪30年代的背景下讨论了克尔凯郭尔的计划,他的丹麦同龄人如J.L.海伯格和H.L.马腾森对浮士德神话的接受,以及那些年笼罩在哥本哈根的对歌德的热情。
{"title":"The Faust Project in Kierkegaard’s Early Journals","authors":"Nassim Bravo","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0008","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article offers a detailed and compact account of what might be called Kierkegaard’s Faust project, that is, the collection of notes, bibliographies and reflections on the mythical German necromancer that the young Kierkegaard registered in his various journals and notebooks from the years 1835 – 1837. As is well known, the young writer presumably intended to pen a book or essay about the universal idea represented by Faust. Additionally, I discuss Kierkegaard’s project within the context of the 1830s, the reception of the Faustian myth among his Danish contemporaries such as J.L. Heiberg and H.L. Martensen, and the enthusiasm for Goethe that seized Copenhagen during those years.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89728720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Section 1:   Problems and Perspectives in Kierkegaard’s Authorship 第一节:克尔凯郭尔创作中的问题与展望
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0998
{"title":"Section 1:   Problems and Perspectives in Kierkegaard’s Authorship","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0998","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0998","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/kierke-2020-0998","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72436440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Of Clairvoyants and Mousvoyants: Kierkegaard’s Polemic against Speculative Philosophy in the “Telegraph Messages” 透视者与穆氏透视者:克尔凯郭尔在《电文》中对思辨哲学的论战
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0009
E. Li
Abstract This article explores Kierkegaard’s largely overlooked 1838 paper “Telegraph Messages from a Mousvoyant to a Clairvoyant concerning the Relation between Xnty and Philosophy,” and argues that it can be read as a polemic against the speculative unity of philosophy and Christianity and speculative thought’s epistemological optimism, especially targeting the Danish speculative theologian Hans Lassen Martensen. It will be suggested that the “Telegraph Messages” offer a corrective to this view by separating Christianity and philosophy and underlining the ambiguity of human existence and the paradoxicality of the religious sphere, thus foreshadowing key themes in Kierkegaard’s mature pseudonymous authorship.
摘要:本文探讨了克尔凯郭尔1838年发表的一篇被忽视的论文《论论与哲学的关系,从一个慕思者到一个透视者的电报》,认为这篇论文可以被解读为对哲学与基督教的思辨统一以及思辨思想的认识论乐观主义的论战,特别是针对丹麦思辨神学家汉斯·拉森·马腾森。有人认为,《电报信息》通过将基督教与哲学分开,强调人类存在的模糊性和宗教领域的悖论性,为这种观点提供了纠正,从而为克尔凯郭尔成熟的笔名写作中的关键主题铺垫了伏笔。
{"title":"Of Clairvoyants and Mousvoyants: Kierkegaard’s Polemic against Speculative Philosophy in the “Telegraph Messages”","authors":"E. Li","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explores Kierkegaard’s largely overlooked 1838 paper “Telegraph Messages from a Mousvoyant to a Clairvoyant concerning the Relation between Xnty and Philosophy,” and argues that it can be read as a polemic against the speculative unity of philosophy and Christianity and speculative thought’s epistemological optimism, especially targeting the Danish speculative theologian Hans Lassen Martensen. It will be suggested that the “Telegraph Messages” offer a corrective to this view by separating Christianity and philosophy and underlining the ambiguity of human existence and the paradoxicality of the religious sphere, thus foreshadowing key themes in Kierkegaard’s mature pseudonymous authorship.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76362630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Know Yourself in the Mirror of the Word: Kierkegaard on Self-Knowledge 从世界的镜子中认识你自己:克尔凯郭尔论自我认识
IF 0.1 Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0006
Kateřina Kolínská
Abstract The article provides a reconstruction of Kierkegaardʼs conception of self-knowledge, mainly in the light of The Concept of Irony, The Sickness unto Death, Philosophical Fragments and selected upbuilding discourses. The concept of self-knowledge, which in Kierkegaard goes beyond mere epistemology, is shown in its duality, as a process which is for Kierkegaard both substantial and relational: to know oneself is for Kierkegaard both an ethical claim upon man and a religious act whose accomplishment is dependent on Godʼs intervention. The article next discusses how self-knowledge involves a relationship to and “knowledge” of God. Finally, it is shown that self-knowledge presupposes not only that one believes himself or herself to be known by God, but also by his or her fellow human beings: self-knowledge requires engagement in the lived world and with others.
摘要本文主要从《反讽的概念》、《致死的病》、《哲学片段》和一些建筑话语的选段等方面对克尔凯郭尔的自我认识概念进行了重构。在克尔凯郭尔看来,自我认识的概念超越了单纯的认识论,它以两重性表现出来,对克尔凯郭尔来说,自我认识既是一个实体的过程,也是一个关系的过程:对克尔凯郭尔来说,认识自己既是一种对人的伦理要求,也是一种宗教行为,其成就依赖于上帝的干预。接下来的文章讨论了自我认识如何涉及到与上帝的关系和对上帝的“认识”。最后,它表明,自我认识的前提是,一个人不仅相信自己是上帝所认识的,而且相信他或她的同胞所认识的:自我认识需要参与生活世界和与他人的交往。
{"title":"Know Yourself in the Mirror of the Word: Kierkegaard on Self-Knowledge","authors":"Kateřina Kolínská","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article provides a reconstruction of Kierkegaardʼs conception of self-knowledge, mainly in the light of The Concept of Irony, The Sickness unto Death, Philosophical Fragments and selected upbuilding discourses. The concept of self-knowledge, which in Kierkegaard goes beyond mere epistemology, is shown in its duality, as a process which is for Kierkegaard both substantial and relational: to know oneself is for Kierkegaard both an ethical claim upon man and a religious act whose accomplishment is dependent on Godʼs intervention. The article next discusses how self-knowledge involves a relationship to and “knowledge” of God. Finally, it is shown that self-knowledge presupposes not only that one believes himself or herself to be known by God, but also by his or her fellow human beings: self-knowledge requires engagement in the lived world and with others.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81725785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1