首页 > 最新文献

Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook最新文献

英文 中文
Section 2:   Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context 第二节:克尔凯郭尔的来源和历史背景
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0997
{"title":"Section 2:   Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0997","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0997","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85313245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Section 5:   Primary Texts in Translation 第五部分:翻译中的主要文本
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0994
{"title":"Section 5:   Primary Texts in Translation","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0994","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0994","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88384317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Ambiguity of Mimesis: Kierkegaard between Aesthetic Fantasy and Religious Imitation 模仿的模糊性:克尔凯郭尔审美幻想与宗教模仿之争
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0005
Nicola Ramazzotto
Abstract This paper attempts to investigate Kierkegaard’s thought through the category of mimesis. First, two meanings of the word are distinguished and analyzed: the archaic meaning that links it to the concept of re-enactment, and the traditional meaning that links it to the aesthetic field of art. These two meanings are then considered in relation to Kierkegaard’s opus, showing the oscillation of mimesis as corresponding to that between the aesthetic, which lives in fantasy and in the unfulfilled possibility, and the religious, which finds its identity in the imitation of Christ and in the transparent relationship to God.
摘要本文试图从摹仿的范畴来考察克尔凯郭尔的思想。首先,对该词的两种含义进行了区分和分析:将其与re-enactment概念联系起来的古代含义和将其与艺术审美领域联系起来的传统含义。这两种意义是与克尔凯郭尔的作品相联系的,它显示了模仿的振荡,它对应于美学和宗教之间的振荡,美学生活在幻想和未实现的可能性中,而宗教则在模仿基督和与上帝的透明关系中找到自己的身份。
{"title":"The Ambiguity of Mimesis: Kierkegaard between Aesthetic Fantasy and Religious Imitation","authors":"Nicola Ramazzotto","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper attempts to investigate Kierkegaard’s thought through the category of mimesis. First, two meanings of the word are distinguished and analyzed: the archaic meaning that links it to the concept of re-enactment, and the traditional meaning that links it to the aesthetic field of art. These two meanings are then considered in relation to Kierkegaard’s opus, showing the oscillation of mimesis as corresponding to that between the aesthetic, which lives in fantasy and in the unfulfilled possibility, and the religious, which finds its identity in the imitation of Christ and in the transparent relationship to God.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"72 1","pages":"85 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87343647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Know Yourself in the Mirror of the Word: Kierkegaard on Self-Knowledge 从世界的镜子中认识你自己:克尔凯郭尔论自我认识
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0006
Kateřina Kolínská
Abstract The article provides a reconstruction of Kierkegaardʼs conception of self-knowledge, mainly in the light of The Concept of Irony, The Sickness unto Death, Philosophical Fragments and selected upbuilding discourses. The concept of self-knowledge, which in Kierkegaard goes beyond mere epistemology, is shown in its duality, as a process which is for Kierkegaard both substantial and relational: to know oneself is for Kierkegaard both an ethical claim upon man and a religious act whose accomplishment is dependent on Godʼs intervention. The article next discusses how self-knowledge involves a relationship to and “knowledge” of God. Finally, it is shown that self-knowledge presupposes not only that one believes himself or herself to be known by God, but also by his or her fellow human beings: self-knowledge requires engagement in the lived world and with others.
摘要本文主要从《反讽的概念》、《致死的病》、《哲学片段》和一些建筑话语的选段等方面对克尔凯郭尔的自我认识概念进行了重构。在克尔凯郭尔看来,自我认识的概念超越了单纯的认识论,它以两重性表现出来,对克尔凯郭尔来说,自我认识既是一个实体的过程,也是一个关系的过程:对克尔凯郭尔来说,认识自己既是一种对人的伦理要求,也是一种宗教行为,其成就依赖于上帝的干预。接下来的文章讨论了自我认识如何涉及到与上帝的关系和对上帝的“认识”。最后,它表明,自我认识的前提是,一个人不仅相信自己是上帝所认识的,而且相信他或她的同胞所认识的:自我认识需要参与生活世界和与他人的交往。
{"title":"Know Yourself in the Mirror of the Word: Kierkegaard on Self-Knowledge","authors":"Kateřina Kolínská","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article provides a reconstruction of Kierkegaardʼs conception of self-knowledge, mainly in the light of The Concept of Irony, The Sickness unto Death, Philosophical Fragments and selected upbuilding discourses. The concept of self-knowledge, which in Kierkegaard goes beyond mere epistemology, is shown in its duality, as a process which is for Kierkegaard both substantial and relational: to know oneself is for Kierkegaard both an ethical claim upon man and a religious act whose accomplishment is dependent on Godʼs intervention. The article next discusses how self-knowledge involves a relationship to and “knowledge” of God. Finally, it is shown that self-knowledge presupposes not only that one believes himself or herself to be known by God, but also by his or her fellow human beings: self-knowledge requires engagement in the lived world and with others.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"31 1","pages":"111 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81725785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Double Consciousness and Despair: Exploring a Connection Between Søren Kierkegaard and W.E.B. Du Bois 双重意识与绝望:探讨克尔凯郭尔与杜波依斯的关系
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0012
M. Kruger
Abstract This paper explores the connection between Søren Kierkegaard’s concept of despair and W.E.B. Du Bois’ concept of double consciousness. The concepts have been separately argued to share a root in Hegel’s “Unhappy Consciousness,” and further, each notion in part explains the interaction of a person with their culture. The paper seeks to highlight the importance of culture in interpreting Kierkegaard’s despair, and to do so by including a critique via Du Bois that a person’s existence in a culture of oppression potentially impacts one’s relation to oneself, whether that person is the oppressor or the oppressed.
摘要本文探讨克尔凯郭尔的绝望概念与杜波依斯的双重意识概念之间的联系。这两个概念分别被认为与黑格尔的“不幸意识”有共同的根源,而且,每个概念都部分地解释了一个人与他们的文化的相互作用。本文试图强调文化在解释克尔凯郭尔的绝望中的重要性,并通过杜波依斯的批评来做到这一点,即一个人在压迫文化中的存在可能会影响一个人与自己的关系,无论这个人是压迫者还是被压迫者。
{"title":"Double Consciousness and Despair: Exploring a Connection Between Søren Kierkegaard and W.E.B. Du Bois","authors":"M. Kruger","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0012","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores the connection between Søren Kierkegaard’s concept of despair and W.E.B. Du Bois’ concept of double consciousness. The concepts have been separately argued to share a root in Hegel’s “Unhappy Consciousness,” and further, each notion in part explains the interaction of a person with their culture. The paper seeks to highlight the importance of culture in interpreting Kierkegaard’s despair, and to do so by including a critique via Du Bois that a person’s existence in a culture of oppression potentially impacts one’s relation to oneself, whether that person is the oppressor or the oppressed.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"7 1","pages":"265 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88733926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Johan Ludvig Heiberg’s “Literary Winter Crops” and Kierkegaard’s Polemic 约翰·路德维格·海伯格的《文学的冬季作物》和克尔凯郭尔的《论战》
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0015
Jon Stewart
Abstract This article provides an English translation of Johan Ludvig Heiberg’s “Literary Winter Crops” from 1843. The young Kierkegaard cultivated a positive relationship with Heiberg, who was the most powerful cultural figure in Denmark at the time. Heiberg published Kierkegaard’s first articles in his literary journal Kjøbenhavns flyvende Post, and in Kierkegaard’s early works such as From the Papers of One Still Living and The Concept of Irony, there are clear signs that he continued to court Heiberg’s favor. Heiberg’s dismissive book review of Either/Or in “Literary Winter Crops” definitively ended the relationship. Deeply offended, Kierkegaard from this point on waged a polemical war with Heiberg. Heiberg’s short review played a large and negative role not just in their personal relationship but also in Kierkegaard’s development generally. This work appears here for the first time in a complete English translation.
本文提供了约翰·路德维格·海伯格1843年的《文学的冬季作物》的英译。年轻的克尔凯郭尔与当时丹麦最有影响力的文化人物海伯格建立了积极的关系。海伯格在他的文学杂志《Kjøbenhavns flyvende Post》上发表了克尔凯郭尔的第一批文章,在克尔凯郭尔的早期作品中,如《从一个还活着的人的论文》和《反讽的概念》,有明显的迹象表明他继续向海伯格献艺。海伯格在《文学的冬季作物》中对非此即彼的不屑一顾的书评最终结束了这段关系。克尔凯郭尔深受冒犯,从这一点开始,他与海伯格展开了一场论战。海伯格的简短评论不仅在他们的个人关系中,而且在克尔凯郭尔的总体发展中都发挥了巨大而消极的作用。这部作品首次以完整的英文译本出现在这里。
{"title":"Johan Ludvig Heiberg’s “Literary Winter Crops” and Kierkegaard’s Polemic","authors":"Jon Stewart","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article provides an English translation of Johan Ludvig Heiberg’s “Literary Winter Crops” from 1843. The young Kierkegaard cultivated a positive relationship with Heiberg, who was the most powerful cultural figure in Denmark at the time. Heiberg published Kierkegaard’s first articles in his literary journal Kjøbenhavns flyvende Post, and in Kierkegaard’s early works such as From the Papers of One Still Living and The Concept of Irony, there are clear signs that he continued to court Heiberg’s favor. Heiberg’s dismissive book review of Either/Or in “Literary Winter Crops” definitively ended the relationship. Deeply offended, Kierkegaard from this point on waged a polemical war with Heiberg. Heiberg’s short review played a large and negative role not just in their personal relationship but also in Kierkegaard’s development generally. This work appears here for the first time in a complete English translation.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"39 1","pages":"325 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90711111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Kierkegaard’s Rewritten Parable of the Good Samaritan Leave the World to the Devil? Kierkegaard and Adorno on What it Means to Love one’s Neighbor in the Modern World 克尔凯郭尔改写的好撒玛利亚人的寓言把世界留给了魔鬼吗?克尔凯郭尔与阿多诺论现代社会中爱邻居的意义
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0010
I. Damgaard
Abstract This article critically examines and discusses the charge, raised by Adorno in his essay on Works of Love, that Kierkegaard’s rewriting of the Gospel story of the good Samaritan reduces neighbor love to abstract inwardness. It has been somewhat ignored in the reception of Adorno’s text that he also praises Kierkegaard as a critic of his time. I explore Adorno’s appreciation of this dimension in Works of Love and seek to develop it further by examining Kierkegaard’s sharp eye for discovering how the inhumanity of the slavery in the past persists in more hidden and subtle ways in the modern world dominated by the instrumental rationality of economics.
本文批判性地考察和讨论了阿多诺在《爱的作品》中提出的指控,即克尔凯郭尔对福音中好撒玛利亚人的故事的改写将邻居的爱降低为抽象的内在性。在接受阿多诺的文本时,他也称赞克尔凯郭尔是他那个时代的批评家,这一点在某种程度上被忽略了。我在《爱的作品》中探讨了阿多诺对这一维度的欣赏,并试图通过考察克尔凯郭尔敏锐的眼光来进一步发展它,他发现了过去奴隶制的非人性是如何在由经济工具理性主导的现代世界中以更隐蔽和微妙的方式持续存在的。
{"title":"Does Kierkegaard’s Rewritten Parable of the Good Samaritan Leave the World to the Devil? Kierkegaard and Adorno on What it Means to Love one’s Neighbor in the Modern World","authors":"I. Damgaard","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0010","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article critically examines and discusses the charge, raised by Adorno in his essay on Works of Love, that Kierkegaard’s rewriting of the Gospel story of the good Samaritan reduces neighbor love to abstract inwardness. It has been somewhat ignored in the reception of Adorno’s text that he also praises Kierkegaard as a critic of his time. I explore Adorno’s appreciation of this dimension in Works of Love and seek to develop it further by examining Kierkegaard’s sharp eye for discovering how the inhumanity of the slavery in the past persists in more hidden and subtle ways in the modern world dominated by the instrumental rationality of economics.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"41 1","pages":"221 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76214265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Kierkegaard and Beauvoir: Existential Ethics as a Humanism 克尔凯郭尔与波伏娃:作为人文主义的存在主义伦理学
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0011
Mélissa Fox-Muraton
Abstract Simone de Beauvoir’s moral philosophy has received relatively little attention in the scholarly world. This article seeks to bring her Ethics of Ambiguity into dialogue with Søren Kierkegaard’s Works of Love, two works written a century apart, but which both strive to offer a response to challenges concerning the dangers of existential philosophy’s focus on subjectivity. Despite some fundamental differences in orientation, especially with regard to questions of action and social change, Beauvoir and Kierkegaard’s works offer complementary models for understanding how existential ethics can move beyond subjectivist stances and allow for attentiveness to the plurality of concrete, singular others.
波伏娃的道德哲学在学术界受到的关注相对较少。本文试图将她的《模棱两可的伦理学》与索伦·克尔凯郭尔的《爱的作品》进行对话,这两部作品相隔一个世纪,但它们都力求对存在主义哲学对主体性的关注所带来的危险做出回应。尽管在取向上存在一些根本性的差异,特别是在行动和社会变革的问题上,波伏娃和克尔凯郭尔的作品为理解存在主义伦理学如何超越主观主义立场,并允许关注具体的、单一的他者的多元性提供了互补的模型。
{"title":"Kierkegaard and Beauvoir: Existential Ethics as a Humanism","authors":"Mélissa Fox-Muraton","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0011","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Simone de Beauvoir’s moral philosophy has received relatively little attention in the scholarly world. This article seeks to bring her Ethics of Ambiguity into dialogue with Søren Kierkegaard’s Works of Love, two works written a century apart, but which both strive to offer a response to challenges concerning the dangers of existential philosophy’s focus on subjectivity. Despite some fundamental differences in orientation, especially with regard to questions of action and social change, Beauvoir and Kierkegaard’s works offer complementary models for understanding how existential ethics can move beyond subjectivist stances and allow for attentiveness to the plurality of concrete, singular others.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"49 1","pages":"241 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73830312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
„Mein Bestreben, das Martyrium zu verherrlichen…“ Zur Idee des Martyriums in Kierkegaards Journalen ab 1846 "自1846年起,我就追求这种荣耀
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0007
Roman Winter
Abstract The article aims at analysing a long and unduly neglected concept in Kierkegaard’s thought: the concept of martyrdom. I argue that this is indeed of central concern for Kierkegaard, and, moreover, that he conceptualizes it in a semantically unified and consistent way. In order to prove this I will focus on the so-called NB journals and provide a comprehensive account of the terms martyrdom and martyr in the context of these sources. Upon closer scrutiny, Kierkegaard distinguishes between two basic types of martyrdom: immediate and reflective. All other forms, as they appear in the journals (and also in the pseudonymous authorship), can be traced back to these basic types.
本文旨在分析克尔凯郭尔思想中一个长期被忽视的概念:殉道概念。我认为这确实是克尔凯郭尔关心的中心问题,而且,他以一种语义上统一和一致的方式概念化了它。为了证明这一点,我将把重点放在所谓的NB期刊上,并在这些来源的背景下提供殉道和殉道者这两个术语的全面描述。仔细观察,克尔凯郭尔区分了两种基本类型的殉道:直接的和反思的。所有其他出现在期刊上的形式(也包括假名作者)都可以追溯到这些基本类型。
{"title":"„Mein Bestreben, das Martyrium zu verherrlichen…“ Zur Idee des Martyriums in Kierkegaards Journalen ab 1846","authors":"Roman Winter","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article aims at analysing a long and unduly neglected concept in Kierkegaard’s thought: the concept of martyrdom. I argue that this is indeed of central concern for Kierkegaard, and, moreover, that he conceptualizes it in a semantically unified and consistent way. In order to prove this I will focus on the so-called NB journals and provide a comprehensive account of the terms martyrdom and martyr in the context of these sources. Upon closer scrutiny, Kierkegaard distinguishes between two basic types of martyrdom: immediate and reflective. All other forms, as they appear in the journals (and also in the pseudonymous authorship), can be traced back to these basic types.","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"9 1","pages":"137 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84976991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abbreviations 缩写
IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0016
{"title":"Abbreviations","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/kierke-2020-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53174,"journal":{"name":"Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90306368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1