Pub Date : 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2024.3506991
Érico Marcon;Giuliano Almeida Marodin;Alejandro G. Frank
Industry 4.0 has been conceived to enhance factory productivity, significantly impacting social aspects such as hierarchical structures, workers' skills, and operational routines. As digital technologies reshape factory activities, the need to support workers and their social environment has become crucial. This article discusses the importance of viewing Industry 4.0 as a sociotechnical system where human and technological elements interact. Despite the recognition of sociotechnical factors in the existing literature, a key gap remains: the interrelation of these factors is often overlooked. We propose using the configurational view, which considers different patterns of sociotechnical configurations within organizations. We analyze 132 manufacturing companies, identifying four distinct sociotechnical configurations. The results indicate that companies combining both social and organizational factors—termed “sociotechnical masters”—achieve the highest performance levels. We contribute to the literature by demonstrating how the integration of sociotechnical and configurational theories offers a more comprehensive framework for interpreting and guiding Industry 4.0 implementation. From a practical standpoint, we provide a detailed list of organizational and social factors to assist managers in establishing a balanced sociotechnical system that supports the successful adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies. In addition, we show how the combination of these factors can improve operational performance metrics.
{"title":"Combining Organizational and Social Factors to Support Industry 4.0 Implementation: A Sociotechnical and Configurational Analysis of Technology Adopters","authors":"Érico Marcon;Giuliano Almeida Marodin;Alejandro G. Frank","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3506991","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3506991","url":null,"abstract":"Industry 4.0 has been conceived to enhance factory productivity, significantly impacting social aspects such as hierarchical structures, workers' skills, and operational routines. As digital technologies reshape factory activities, the need to support workers and their social environment has become crucial. This article discusses the importance of viewing Industry 4.0 as a sociotechnical system where human and technological elements interact. Despite the recognition of sociotechnical factors in the existing literature, a key gap remains: the interrelation of these factors is often overlooked. We propose using the configurational view, which considers different patterns of sociotechnical configurations within organizations. We analyze 132 manufacturing companies, identifying four distinct sociotechnical configurations. The results indicate that companies combining both social and organizational factors—termed “sociotechnical masters”—achieve the highest performance levels. We contribute to the literature by demonstrating how the integration of sociotechnical and configurational theories offers a more comprehensive framework for interpreting and guiding Industry 4.0 implementation. From a practical standpoint, we provide a detailed list of organizational and social factors to assist managers in establishing a balanced sociotechnical system that supports the successful adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies. In addition, we show how the combination of these factors can improve operational performance metrics.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"146-160"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142937851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-22DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2024.3504740
Yan Wang;Naiding Yang;Chunxiao Xie;Mingzhen Zhang;Sayed Muhammad Fawad Sharif
Network position has long been a focal point for network researchers. In today's dynamic environment, firms' positions within networks change over time. While evidence suggests that dynamic positioning is important for innovation, the exact relationship between the two remains unclear. Furthermore, empirical studies on how firms can improve their positions within networks are limited, significantly hindering the practical value of network position research. This article draws on network dynamics and social embeddedness theory to integrate dynamic network capability and the type of product innovation—modular innovation and architectural innovation—into a model that examines the driving and action paths of dynamic positioning in the complex product domain. Results from a sample of 270 complex product firms across eight key cities in China indicate that dynamic network capability is positively correlated with dynamic positioning, characterized by increased centrality and structural holes. These enhanced positions, in turn, positively influence innovation. In addition, the study finds that modular innovation strengthens the positive impact of increased centrality on innovation while architectural innovation weakens this effect. However, neither modular innovation nor architectural innovation moderates the relationship between increased structural holes and innovation. This study provides a dynamic perspective on network position, offering valuable insights and guidance for firms seeking to enhance their positions and drive innovation in the complex product domain.
{"title":"Position and Value: Dynamic Network Capability, Dynamic Positioning, and Innovation in Complex Product Domain","authors":"Yan Wang;Naiding Yang;Chunxiao Xie;Mingzhen Zhang;Sayed Muhammad Fawad Sharif","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3504740","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3504740","url":null,"abstract":"Network position has long been a focal point for network researchers. In today's dynamic environment, firms' positions within networks change over time. While evidence suggests that dynamic positioning is important for innovation, the exact relationship between the two remains unclear. Furthermore, empirical studies on how firms can improve their positions within networks are limited, significantly hindering the practical value of network position research. This article draws on network dynamics and social embeddedness theory to integrate dynamic network capability and the type of product innovation—modular innovation and architectural innovation—into a model that examines the driving and action paths of dynamic positioning in the complex product domain. Results from a sample of 270 complex product firms across eight key cities in China indicate that dynamic network capability is positively correlated with dynamic positioning, characterized by increased centrality and structural holes. These enhanced positions, in turn, positively influence innovation. In addition, the study finds that modular innovation strengthens the positive impact of increased centrality on innovation while architectural innovation weakens this effect. However, neither modular innovation nor architectural innovation moderates the relationship between increased structural holes and innovation. This study provides a dynamic perspective on network position, offering valuable insights and guidance for firms seeking to enhance their positions and drive innovation in the complex product domain.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"176-190"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142937849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2024.3486250
Mourad Chouki;Mahrane Hofaidhllaoui;Maryam Kefi Ben Chehida;Laurent Giraud;Marina Dabić
This article examines the impact of design thinking on the implementation of agile methods by user experience designers, with a focus on the roles of coordination and user testing as mediators. Data were collected from an online survey of 431 user experience designers in France between 2020 and 2022 and analyzed using structural equation modeling ( partial least squares regressions