This paper presents initial findings on the interaction between astronomical procedures on Babylonian tablets. Using algorithms as a lens, this research investigates the relationship between procedures, data provided on the tablet, and the representations of methods within the tablets. This paper first provides a critical analysis of the term “algorithm” in a historical, Mesopotamian context and how algorithms may be used as an analytical tool for thinking about the relationship between astronomical procedures. Following this description, the paper moves on to discuss a case study from the planetary procedure texts that showcases how an algorithm-based analysis can inform reinterpretations of how the individual procedures interact on a given tablet. The ultimate goal of this work is to shed new light on how the authors and users of these astronomical tablets may have interacted with them.
{"title":"Algorithmic Relationships in Babylonian Astronomical Procedure Texts","authors":"Erica L. Meszaros","doi":"10.1002/bewi.202400021","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bewi.202400021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents initial findings on the interaction between astronomical procedures on Babylonian tablets. Using algorithms as a lens, this research investigates the relationship between procedures, data provided on the tablet, and the representations of methods within the tablets. This paper first provides a critical analysis of the term “algorithm” in a historical, Mesopotamian context and how algorithms may be used as an analytical tool for thinking about the relationship between astronomical procedures. Following this description, the paper moves on to discuss a case study from the planetary procedure texts that showcases how an algorithm-based analysis can inform reinterpretations of how the individual procedures interact on a given tablet. The ultimate goal of this work is to shed new light on how the authors and users of these astronomical tablets may have interacted with them.</p>","PeriodicalId":55388,"journal":{"name":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","volume":"48 1-2","pages":"11-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144049377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident underscored the crucial role of nuclear engineering experts. However, the specific arguments and motivations of scientists advocating for the introduction of foreign reactors remain unclear. This study delves into the contribution of Ryōkichi Sagane (1905–1969), a prominent figure during their introduction, and analyzes the specifics of his arguments for the importation of reactors examining his motivations and background. Sagane, who studied nuclear physics in the U.S., gained expertise in nuclear experiments and became acquainted with American scientists. In the late 1950s, with the period of Japan's adoption of nuclear power, he understood the arguments of foreign and domestic experts and disseminated this information to the public. His claims for importation of reactors rested predominantly on the ground of economic and managerial rationality. Beyond mere rationalism, Sagane's drive for reactor introduction was rooted in international humanitarianism based on personal friendships that transcended national borders. The rhetoric of promoting nuclear power for the sake of humanity resonated with the nuclear energy policy of the U.S. during the early Cold War. However, unlike the motivation of the U.S. to suppress opposition to the development of nuclear weapons, Sagane's motivation arose from his scientific practice.
{"title":"Economic Rationality and International Humanitarianism: Ryōkichi Sagane's Advocacy Regarding the Introduction of Foreign Nuclear Reactors to Japan**","authors":"Masahiro Inohana","doi":"10.1002/bewi.202400018","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bewi.202400018","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident underscored the crucial role of nuclear engineering experts. However, the specific arguments and motivations of scientists advocating for the introduction of foreign reactors remain unclear. This study delves into the contribution of Ryōkichi Sagane (1905–1969), a prominent figure during their introduction, and analyzes the specifics of his arguments for the importation of reactors examining his motivations and background. Sagane, who studied nuclear physics in the U.S., gained expertise in nuclear experiments and became acquainted with American scientists. In the late 1950s, with the period of Japan's adoption of nuclear power, he understood the arguments of foreign and domestic experts and disseminated this information to the public. His claims for importation of reactors rested predominantly on the ground of economic and managerial rationality. Beyond mere rationalism, Sagane's drive for reactor introduction was rooted in international humanitarianism based on personal friendships that transcended national borders. The rhetoric of promoting nuclear power for the sake of humanity resonated with the nuclear energy policy of the U.S. during the early Cold War. However, unlike the motivation of the U.S. to suppress opposition to the development of nuclear weapons, Sagane's motivation arose from his scientific practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55388,"journal":{"name":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","volume":"48 1-2","pages":"112-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bewi.202400018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143998168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
When cosmic rays—high-energy particles from outer space—encounter the Earth's atmosphere, they produce particles called neutrinos. To detect them, physicists go underground inside deep mines where the overlying rock can filter out the cosmic-ray background radiation. I examine how the first such detection of neutrinos in 1965 by an international team of physicists at the Kolar Gold Fields (KGF) in India—a gold mine where the British began mining in 1880—was made possible by the invisible labor of lowered-caste, or Dalit, miners. By studying the underground, this paper contributes to recent attention to verticality in the history of science, while moving away from the dominant approach to spatial studies of sites of science, the lab–field framework, and instead examining the social, political, and economic conditions that made KGF, with its depth, possible as a site for physics.
Using labor histories of KGF and archival material about the experiments, I argue that the mines became nearly three kilometers deep only because of a regime of racialized labor in which Dalit miners worked in difficult and dangerous conditions for less than subsistence-level wages. I also show how the experiments depended on this invisible labor that ran the mines.
{"title":"Invisible Labor and the “Ghost Particle”: Underground Physics at the Kolar Gold Fields**","authors":"Nithyanand Rao","doi":"10.1002/bewi.202400020","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bewi.202400020","url":null,"abstract":"<p>When cosmic rays—high-energy particles from outer space—encounter the Earth's atmosphere, they produce particles called neutrinos. To detect them, physicists go underground inside deep mines where the overlying rock can filter out the cosmic-ray background radiation. I examine how the first such detection of neutrinos in 1965 by an international team of physicists at the Kolar Gold Fields (KGF) in India—a gold mine where the British began mining in 1880—was made possible by the invisible labor of lowered-caste, or Dalit, miners. By studying the underground, this paper contributes to recent attention to verticality in the history of science, while moving away from the dominant approach to spatial studies of sites of science, the lab–field framework, and instead examining the social, political, and economic conditions that made KGF, with its depth, possible as a site for physics.</p><p>Using labor histories of KGF and archival material about the experiments, I argue that the mines became nearly three kilometers deep only because of a regime of racialized labor in which Dalit miners worked in difficult and dangerous conditions for less than subsistence-level wages. I also show how the experiments depended on this invisible labor that ran the mines.</p>","PeriodicalId":55388,"journal":{"name":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","volume":"48 1-2","pages":"163-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bewi.202400020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143993035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Short-lived, unobservable, and not subject to the usual rules of conservation of energy and momentum, virtual particles—an integral part of the conceptual framework of quantum field theory (QFT)—exhibit a number of curious characteristics which, in recent decades, have in part fueled important discussions about their ontological status. Central to these debates is Richard Feynman's diagrammatic technique for QFT calculations, which provided in the late 1940s the first systematized and generalized description of the concept of virtual particles. At the time, however, the curious characteristics and the ontology of the latter were the subject of little, if any, debate. This article explores how the concept of virtual particles gradually became subject to interpretative scrutiny in the post-war period. It examines the weight of various aspects of pre-Feynman developments which once guaranteed a firmer phenomenological anchoring of the scientific practices associated with the virtual particle concept. Subsequently, it shows how the questioning of this concept did not result from a simple assessment of its curious characteristics but was part of a wider critique of the new quantum electrodynamics and Feynman's methods.
{"title":"The Curious Concept That Almost Nobody Seemed to Care About at First: Virtual Particles in the Post-War Period**","authors":"Jean-Philippe Martinez","doi":"10.1002/bewi.202400023","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bewi.202400023","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Short-lived, unobservable, and not subject to the usual rules of conservation of energy and momentum, virtual particles—an integral part of the conceptual framework of quantum field theory (QFT)—exhibit a number of curious characteristics which, in recent decades, have in part fueled important discussions about their ontological status. Central to these debates is Richard Feynman's diagrammatic technique for QFT calculations, which provided in the late 1940s the first systematized and generalized description of the concept of virtual particles. At the time, however, the curious characteristics and the ontology of the latter were the subject of little, if any, debate. This article explores how the concept of virtual particles gradually became subject to interpretative scrutiny in the post-war period. It examines the weight of various aspects of pre-Feynman developments which once guaranteed a firmer phenomenological anchoring of the scientific practices associated with the virtual particle concept. Subsequently, it shows how the questioning of this concept did not result from a simple assessment of its curious characteristics but was part of a wider critique of the new quantum electrodynamics and Feynman's methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":55388,"journal":{"name":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","volume":"48 1-2","pages":"143-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bewi.202400023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144030151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}