首页 > 最新文献

American journal of industrial medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Psychological Well-Being of US Educators Remains a Post-Pandemic Concern: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study 美国教育工作者的心理健康仍然是大流行后的一个问题:一项横断面研究的结果。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23731
Jennifer M. Cavallari, Sierra M. Trudel, Natalie R. Charamut, Megan N. Miskovsky, Matthew Brennan, Amanda J. L. Hiner, Rebecca J. Gore, Lisa M. H. Sanetti, Alicia G. Dugan

Background

Educator mental health plays an important role in schools, yet the long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic remain unknown. We sought to estimate the prevalence of school employee stress, anxiety, and depression in the 2022–2023 school year within two school districts in the Northeastern United States.

Methods

An electronic survey was distributed to school employees. Stress was assessed with the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale with scores 0–13, 14–26, and 27–40 representing low, moderate, and high stress. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression 10-item scale were used to assess clinically significant anxiety and depressive symptoms, with a cut-point of 10 applied to the total summed score of each scale. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

The majority (76.0%) of the 725 school employees surveyed reported moderate to severe stress with 31.2% and 49.5% reporting clinically significant anxiety or depressive symptoms, respectively. A significantly higher prevalence of anxiety was reported among females (PR = 1.15 (CI: 1.02, 1.30)), instructional staff (PR = 1.15 (CI: 1.02, 1.30)), and employees reporting financial insecurity (PR = 1.18 (CI: 1.10, 1.27)). Likewise, a significantly higher prevalence of depression was reported was reported among women (PR = 1.24; CI (1.00–1.52)), instructional staff (PR = 1.31; CI (1.06–1.62)), and employees reporting financial insecurity (PR = 1.38; CI (1.19–1.60)). Stress, anxiety, and depression were each associated with employees’ intention to quit.

Conclusions

The residual effects of the pandemic remain prevalent among school employees. Improving school employees’ mental health is crucial for the well-being and retention of educators.

背景:教育工作者的心理健康在学校中发挥着重要作用,但COVID-19大流行的长期影响尚不清楚。我们试图估计美国东北部两个学区在2022-2023学年的学校员工压力、焦虑和抑郁的患病率。方法:对学校职工进行电子问卷调查。压力评估采用10项感知压力量表,0-13分,14-26分,27-40分分别代表低、中、高压力。使用广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表和流行病学研究中心抑郁10项量表来评估临床显著的焦虑和抑郁症状,每个量表的总总分采用10分的分界点。我们使用对数二项回归模型来估计患病率(PR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:在接受调查的725名学校员工中,大多数(76.0%)报告有中度至重度压力,其中31.2%和49.5%分别报告有临床显著的焦虑或抑郁症状。据报道,女性(PR = 1.15 (CI: 1.02, 1.30))、教学人员(PR = 1.15 (CI: 1.02, 1.30))和报告财务不安全的员工(PR = 1.18 (CI: 1.10, 1.27))的焦虑患病率明显较高。同样,女性中抑郁症的患病率明显更高(PR = 1.24;CI(1.00-1.52)),教学人员(PR = 1.31;CI(1.06-1.62)),员工报告财务不安全(PR = 1.38;CI(1.19 - -1.60))。压力、焦虑和抑郁都与员工的辞职意图有关。结论:大流行的残余影响在学校员工中仍然普遍存在。改善学校员工的心理健康对教育工作者的福祉和留任至关重要。
{"title":"Psychological Well-Being of US Educators Remains a Post-Pandemic Concern: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Jennifer M. Cavallari,&nbsp;Sierra M. Trudel,&nbsp;Natalie R. Charamut,&nbsp;Megan N. Miskovsky,&nbsp;Matthew Brennan,&nbsp;Amanda J. L. Hiner,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Gore,&nbsp;Lisa M. H. Sanetti,&nbsp;Alicia G. Dugan","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23731","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajim.23731","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Educator mental health plays an important role in schools, yet the long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic remain unknown. We sought to estimate the prevalence of school employee stress, anxiety, and depression in the 2022–2023 school year within two school districts in the Northeastern United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>An electronic survey was distributed to school employees. Stress was assessed with the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale with scores 0–13, 14–26, and 27–40 representing low, moderate, and high stress. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression 10-item scale were used to assess clinically significant anxiety and depressive symptoms, with a cut-point of 10 applied to the total summed score of each scale. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The majority (76.0%) of the 725 school employees surveyed reported moderate to severe stress with 31.2% and 49.5% reporting clinically significant anxiety or depressive symptoms, respectively. A significantly higher prevalence of anxiety was reported among females (PR = 1.15 (CI: 1.02, 1.30)), instructional staff (PR = 1.15 (CI: 1.02, 1.30)), and employees reporting financial insecurity (PR = 1.18 (CI: 1.10, 1.27)). Likewise, a significantly higher prevalence of depression was reported was reported among women (PR = 1.24; CI (1.00–1.52)), instructional staff (PR = 1.31; CI (1.06–1.62)), and employees reporting financial insecurity (PR = 1.38; CI (1.19–1.60)). Stress, anxiety, and depression were each associated with employees’ intention to quit.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The residual effects of the pandemic remain prevalent among school employees. Improving school employees’ mental health is crucial for the well-being and retention of educators.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 7","pages":"642-650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143952480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Applying the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Framework to Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers: Insights From the Literature 将NIOSH工人福利框架应用于移民和季节性农场工人:来自文献的见解。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23728
Tessa Bonney, Dana Madigan, Vinay Espinosa-Ravi, Linda Forst

Background

There is a growing appreciation of the importance of health and well-being and of the complex set of factors, within and outside the workplace, that interact to affect the well-being of workers. Migrant and seasonal farmworkers experience particular challenges, and measurement of factors that influence their health and well-being is important to the ethical sustainability of this critical workforce.

Methods

To examine the applicability of the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Framework to the health and well-being of farmworkers, we conducted a literature review to (1) explore the ways in which the domains, subdomains, and constructs of the framework are described in studies of farmworkers, and (2) identify additional constructs that are not described or not in alignment with the framework.

Results

Four reviewers used a thematic analysis approach to identify and summarize key areas of alignment and non-alignment of 163 included articles. We found alignment with the five framework domains and their sub-domains, though several are understudied or narrowly operationalized in studies of farmworkers. The vast majority of studies addressed contributors to poor health. We found five additional cross-cutting or unaligned themes (legal status, discrimination, exploitation, fear of retaliation, fear of deportation).

Conclusions

External and work-related social factors are important to the well-being of the farmworker workforce. Contextual determinants of employment precarity, hazardous occupational and nonoccupational exposures, and social safety nets should be considered in comprehensive assessments of worker well-being. Other precarious and immigrant workforces may also require expansion of the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Framework.

背景:人们越来越认识到健康和福祉的重要性,以及工作场所内外相互作用影响工人福祉的一系列复杂因素。移民和季节性农场工人面临着特殊的挑战,衡量影响他们健康和福祉的因素对这一关键劳动力的道德可持续性很重要。方法:为了检验NIOSH工人福祉框架对农场工人健康和福祉的适用性,我们进行了文献综述,以:(1)探索农场工人研究中描述框架的域、子域和结构的方式,以及(2)确定未描述或与框架不一致的其他结构。结果:四名审稿人使用主题分析方法来识别和总结163篇纳入文章的对齐和不对齐的关键领域。我们发现了与五个框架域及其子域的一致性,尽管在对农场工人的研究中有几个研究不足或操作狭隘。绝大多数研究都涉及导致健康状况不佳的因素。我们还发现了另外五个交叉或不一致的主题(法律地位、歧视、剥削、害怕报复、害怕驱逐出境)。结论:外部和与工作相关的社会因素对农场工人劳动力的幸福感很重要。在全面评估工人福利时,应考虑就业不稳定性、危险的职业和非职业暴露以及社会安全网的环境决定因素。其他不稳定和移民劳动力也可能需要扩大NIOSH工人福利框架。
{"title":"Applying the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Framework to Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers: Insights From the Literature","authors":"Tessa Bonney,&nbsp;Dana Madigan,&nbsp;Vinay Espinosa-Ravi,&nbsp;Linda Forst","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23728","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajim.23728","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There is a growing appreciation of the importance of health and well-being and of the complex set of factors, within and outside the workplace, that interact to affect the well-being of workers. Migrant and seasonal farmworkers experience particular challenges, and measurement of factors that influence their health and well-being is important to the ethical sustainability of this critical workforce.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine the applicability of the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Framework to the health and well-being of farmworkers, we conducted a literature review to (1) explore the ways in which the domains, subdomains, and constructs of the framework are described in studies of farmworkers, and (2) identify additional constructs that are not described or not in alignment with the framework.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Four reviewers used a thematic analysis approach to identify and summarize key areas of alignment and non-alignment of 163 included articles. We found alignment with the five framework domains and their sub-domains, though several are understudied or narrowly operationalized in studies of farmworkers. The vast majority of studies addressed contributors to poor health. We found five additional cross-cutting or unaligned themes (legal status, discrimination, exploitation, fear of retaliation, fear of deportation).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>External and work-related social factors are important to the well-being of the farmworker workforce. Contextual determinants of employment precarity, hazardous occupational and nonoccupational exposures, and social safety nets should be considered in comprehensive assessments of worker well-being. Other precarious and immigrant workforces may also require expansion of the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Framework.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 7","pages":"573-587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23728","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143971503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Industrial Robotics and the Future of Work 工业机器人和未来的工作。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23729
John Howard, Vladimir Murashov, Gary Roth, Christopher Wendt, Jacob Carr, Marvin Cheng, Scott Earnest, K. C. Elliott, Emily Haas, Ci-Jyun Liang, Gretchen Petery, Jennifer Ragsdale, Christopher Reid, Peregrin Spielholz, Douglas Trout, Divya Srinivasan

Starting in the 1970s with robots that were physically isolated from contact with their human co-workers, robots now collaborate with human workers towards a common task goal in a shared workspace. This type of robotic device represents a new era of workplace automation. Industrial robotics is rapidly evolving due to advances in sensor technology, artificial intelligence (AI), wireless communications, mechanical engineering, and materials science. While these new robotic devices are used mainly in manufacturing and warehousing, human-robot collaboration is now seen across multiple goods-producing and service-delivery industry sectors. Assessing and controlling the risks of human-robot collaboration is a critical challenge for occupational safety and health research and practice as industrial robotics becomes a pervasive feature of the future of work. Understanding the physical, psychosocial, work organization, and cybersecurity risks associated with the increasing use of robotic technologies is critical to ensuring the safe development and implementation of industrial robotics. This commentary provides a brief review of the uses of robotic technologies across selected industry sectors; the risks of current and future industrial robotic applications for worker and employer alike; strategies for integrating human-robot collaboration into a health and safety management system; and the role of robotic safety standards in the future of work.

从20世纪70年代开始,机器人在物理上与人类同事隔绝,现在机器人与人类工人合作,在共享的工作空间中实现共同的任务目标。这种类型的机器人设备代表了工作场所自动化的新时代。由于传感器技术、人工智能(AI)、无线通信、机械工程和材料科学的进步,工业机器人正在迅速发展。虽然这些新的机器人设备主要用于制造和仓储,但现在在多个商品生产和服务交付行业领域都可以看到人机协作。随着工业机器人成为未来工作的普遍特征,评估和控制人机协作的风险是职业安全与健康研究和实践的关键挑战。了解与机器人技术使用增加相关的物理、社会心理、工作组织和网络安全风险对于确保工业机器人的安全开发和实施至关重要。这篇评论提供了机器人技术在选定行业部门的使用的简要回顾;当前和未来工业机器人应用对工人和雇主的风险;将人机协作纳入健康和安全管理系统的策略;以及机器人安全标准在未来工作中的作用。
{"title":"Industrial Robotics and the Future of Work","authors":"John Howard,&nbsp;Vladimir Murashov,&nbsp;Gary Roth,&nbsp;Christopher Wendt,&nbsp;Jacob Carr,&nbsp;Marvin Cheng,&nbsp;Scott Earnest,&nbsp;K. C. Elliott,&nbsp;Emily Haas,&nbsp;Ci-Jyun Liang,&nbsp;Gretchen Petery,&nbsp;Jennifer Ragsdale,&nbsp;Christopher Reid,&nbsp;Peregrin Spielholz,&nbsp;Douglas Trout,&nbsp;Divya Srinivasan","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23729","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajim.23729","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Starting in the 1970s with robots that were physically <i>isolated</i> from contact with their human co-workers, robots now <i>collaborate</i> with human workers towards a common task goal in a shared workspace. This type of robotic device represents a new era of workplace automation. Industrial robotics is rapidly evolving due to advances in sensor technology, artificial intelligence (AI), wireless communications, mechanical engineering, and materials science. While these new robotic devices are used mainly in manufacturing and warehousing, human-robot collaboration is now seen across multiple goods-producing and service-delivery industry sectors. Assessing and controlling the risks of human-robot collaboration is a critical challenge for occupational safety and health research and practice as industrial robotics becomes a pervasive feature of the future of work. Understanding the physical, psychosocial, work organization, and cybersecurity risks associated with the increasing use of robotic technologies is critical to ensuring the safe development and implementation of industrial robotics. This commentary provides a brief review of the uses of robotic technologies across selected industry sectors; the risks of current and future industrial robotic applications for worker and employer alike; strategies for integrating human-robot collaboration into a health and safety management system; and the role of robotic safety standards in the future of work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 7","pages":"559-572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143966009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Serum Concentration of Selected Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Industry and Occupational Groups Among US Adult Workers, NHANES 2005–2014 NHANES 2005-2014,美国成年工人中按行业和职业分类的选定全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的血清浓度
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23726
Ja K. Gu, Luenda E. Charles, Chol Seung Lim, Anna Mnatsakanova, Stacey Anderson, Lisa Dzubak, Erin McCanlies

Purpose

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are associated with multiple health effects including pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia, increased serum hepatic enzymes, increased in serum lipids, decreased antibody response to vaccines, and decreased birth weight. Millions of US workers are exposed to PFAS at their workplaces. Our objective was to estimate the serum levels of the five PFAS that are most frequently detected in the US general population(perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)) among US adult workers.

Methods

Participants were 4476 workers aged ≥ 20 years with PFAS analyte results available who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2005–2014. Geometric mean serum levels of PFAS (ng/mL) were obtained across industry and occupation groups using the PFAS subsample weight in SAS-callable SUDAAN V11.

Results

Among 21 industry groups, the highest geometric mean PFAS levels (ng/mL) were observed in Construction (PFOS = 12.61 ng/mL, PFOA = 3.76, PFHxS = 2.10, PFNA = 1.23, and PFDA = 0.33), followed by Utilities (PFOS = 12.46), and Real Estate/Rental/Leasing (PFOS = 12.15). The lowest geometric mean PFAS levels were seen in Private Households (PFOS = 6.34, PFOA = 2.12, PFHxS=0.75, PFNA = 0.86, and PFDA = 0.25). Among 22 occupation groups, the highest geometric mean PFAS levels were observed in Life/Physical/Social Science occupations (PFOS = 13.19, PFOA = 3.54, PFHxS= 1.69, PFNA = 1.23, and PFDA = 0.33), followed by Installation/Maintenance/Repair occupations (PFOS = 12.75), and Construction/Extraction occupations (PFOS = 12.15). The lowest geometric mean PFAS levels were found in Personal Care/Service occupations (PFOS = 7.25, PFOA = 2.43, PFHxS = 1.07, PFNA = 0.94, and PFDA = 0.25).

Conclusions

Some industry and occupation groups had higher geometric mean levels of PFAS in serum compared to others. Further investigation of these industries and occupations may result in a better understanding of the sources and degree of occupational exposure to PFAS.

全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)与多种健康影响有关,包括妊娠高血压和先兆子痫、血清肝酶升高、血脂升高、对疫苗的抗体反应降低和出生体重下降。数以百万计的美国工人在工作场所接触到PFAS。我们的目的是估计美国成年工人中最常检测到的五种全氟辛烷磺酸(全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)、全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)、全氟癸酸(PFDA)和全氟膦酸(PFNA))的血清水平。方法选取2005-2014年参加全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)的4476名年龄≥20岁且PFAS分析结果可用的工人为研究对象。在sas可调用的SUDAAN V11中,使用PFAS子样本权重获得不同行业和职业组的PFAS几何平均血清水平(ng/mL)。结果21个行业中,建筑行业的几何平均PFAS水平(ng/mL)最高(PFOS = 12.61 ng/mL, PFOA = 3.76, PFHxS = 2.10, PFNA = 1.23, PFDA = 0.33),其次是公用事业(PFOS = 12.46)和房地产/租赁/租赁(PFOS = 12.15)。几何平均PFAS水平最低的是私人家庭(PFOS = 6.34, PFOA = 2.12, PFHxS=0.75, PFNA = 0.86, PFDA = 0.25)。在22个职业组中,生命/物理/社会科学职业的几何平均PFAS水平最高(PFOS = 13.19, PFOA = 3.54, PFHxS= 1.69, PFNA = 1.23, PFDA = 0.33),其次是安装/维护/修理职业(PFOS = 12.75)和建筑/采掘职业(PFOS = 12.15)。几何平均PFAS水平最低的职业是个人护理/服务行业(PFOS = 7.25, PFOA = 2.43, PFHxS = 1.07, PFNA = 0.94, PFDA = 0.25)。结论部分行业和职业人群血清PFAS几何平均水平高于其他行业和职业人群。对这些行业和职业的进一步调查可能会更好地了解PFAS的来源和职业暴露程度。
{"title":"Serum Concentration of Selected Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Industry and Occupational Groups Among US Adult Workers, NHANES 2005–2014","authors":"Ja K. Gu,&nbsp;Luenda E. Charles,&nbsp;Chol Seung Lim,&nbsp;Anna Mnatsakanova,&nbsp;Stacey Anderson,&nbsp;Lisa Dzubak,&nbsp;Erin McCanlies","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23726","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are associated with multiple health effects including pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia, increased serum hepatic enzymes, increased in serum lipids, decreased antibody response to vaccines, and decreased birth weight. Millions of US workers are exposed to PFAS at their workplaces. Our objective was to estimate the serum levels of the five PFAS that are most frequently detected in the US general population(perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)) among US adult workers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participants were 4476 workers aged ≥ 20 years with PFAS analyte results available who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2005–2014. Geometric mean serum levels of PFAS (ng/mL) were obtained across industry and occupation groups using the PFAS subsample weight in SAS-callable SUDAAN V11.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 21 industry groups, the highest geometric mean PFAS levels (ng/mL) were observed in Construction (PFOS = 12.61 ng/mL, PFOA = 3.76, PFHxS = 2.10, PFNA = 1.23, and PFDA = 0.33), followed by Utilities (PFOS = 12.46), and Real Estate/Rental/Leasing (PFOS = 12.15). The lowest geometric mean PFAS levels were seen in Private Households (PFOS = 6.34, PFOA = 2.12, PFHxS=0.75, PFNA = 0.86, and PFDA = 0.25). Among 22 occupation groups, the highest geometric mean PFAS levels were observed in Life/Physical/Social Science occupations (PFOS = 13.19, PFOA = 3.54, PFHxS= 1.69, PFNA = 1.23, and PFDA = 0.33), followed by Installation/Maintenance/Repair occupations (PFOS = 12.75), and Construction/Extraction occupations (PFOS = 12.15). The lowest geometric mean PFAS levels were found in Personal Care/Service occupations (PFOS = 7.25, PFOA = 2.43, PFHxS = 1.07, PFNA = 0.94, and PFDA = 0.25).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Some industry and occupation groups had higher geometric mean levels of PFAS in serum compared to others. Further investigation of these industries and occupations may result in a better understanding of the sources and degree of occupational exposure to PFAS.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 6","pages":"531-542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143939612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Silicosis, Sarcoidosis, or Both? Rethinking Disease Labels in Light of Co-Occurrence 矽肺,结节病,还是两者都有?从共现的角度重新思考疾病标签
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-26 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23730
Steven Ronsmans, Benoit Nemery, Nico De Crem, Birgit Weynand
{"title":"Silicosis, Sarcoidosis, or Both? Rethinking Disease Labels in Light of Co-Occurrence","authors":"Steven Ronsmans,&nbsp;Benoit Nemery,&nbsp;Nico De Crem,&nbsp;Birgit Weynand","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23730","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23730","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 6","pages":"487-490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143939648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Component Associations of the Healthy Worker Survivor Bias in Medical Radiation Workers 医疗放射工作者中健康工作者幸存者偏见的组成协会
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23727
Won Jin Lee, Jaeho Jeong, Young Min Kim

Background

The healthy worker survivor bias may vary by sex. This study investigated three component associations necessary for this bias to determine the origins of sex differences in this bias among male and female workers.

Methods

We analyzed a data set of 93,918 South Korean diagnostic medical radiation workers registered in the National Dose Registry from 1996 to 2011, linked with mortality and cancer incidence data. Component associations were assessed using Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to estimate odds ratios (ORs).

Results

A significant association between prior cumulative exposure and employment status was observed for all-cause mortality in male (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.10), whereas an inverse association was noted in female workers (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78–0.87). Adjusted ORs for employment status and subsequent exposure for all-cause mortality, as well as HRs for employment status and survival time, demonstrated associations in the same direction in both males and females.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that sex-specific differences in healthy worker survivor bias were primarily driven by the association between prior exposure and employment status. To improve bias mitigation in occupational cohort studies, sex-specific components should be incorporated.

健康工人幸存者偏见可能因性别而异。本研究调查了这种偏见所必需的三个组成部分的关联,以确定这种偏见在男性和女性工人中性别差异的起源。方法我们分析了1996年至2011年在国家剂量登记处注册的93,918名韩国诊断医疗放射工作者的数据集,与死亡率和癌症发病率数据相关。采用Cox回归估计风险比(hr),采用广义估计方程进行logistic回归评估优势比(ORs)。结果在男性全因死亡率中,既往累积暴露与就业状况之间存在显著相关性(HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10),而在女性全因死亡率中存在负相关(HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.87)。调整就业状态和随后暴露导致的全因死亡率的ORs,以及就业状态和生存时间的hr,在男性和女性中都显示出相同方向的关联。我们的研究结果表明,健康工人幸存者偏见的性别差异主要是由先前暴露与就业状况之间的关联驱动的。为了改善职业队列研究中的偏倚缓解,应纳入性别特异性成分。
{"title":"Component Associations of the Healthy Worker Survivor Bias in Medical Radiation Workers","authors":"Won Jin Lee,&nbsp;Jaeho Jeong,&nbsp;Young Min Kim","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23727","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23727","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The healthy worker survivor bias may vary by sex. This study investigated three component associations necessary for this bias to determine the origins of sex differences in this bias among male and female workers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We analyzed a data set of 93,918 South Korean diagnostic medical radiation workers registered in the National Dose Registry from 1996 to 2011, linked with mortality and cancer incidence data. Component associations were assessed using Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to estimate odds ratios (ORs).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A significant association between prior cumulative exposure and employment status was observed for all-cause mortality in male (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.10), whereas an inverse association was noted in female workers (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78–0.87). Adjusted ORs for employment status and subsequent exposure for all-cause mortality, as well as HRs for employment status and survival time, demonstrated associations in the same direction in both males and females.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our findings demonstrate that sex-specific differences in healthy worker survivor bias were primarily driven by the association between prior exposure and employment status. To improve bias mitigation in occupational cohort studies, sex-specific components should be incorporated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 6","pages":"552-556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23727","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143939387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Silicosarcoidosis: Histologic and Clinical Features of an Occupational Granulomatous Disease 矽肺结节病:职业性肉芽肿病的组织学和临床特征
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23724
Jeremy T. Hua, Carlyne D. Cool, Einat Fireman Klein, Yochai Adir, Lukas J. Lee, Lauren M. Zell-Baran, Robert A. Cohen, Richard C. Kraus, E. Brigitte Gottschall, Silpa D. Krefft, Charles Van Hook, Cecile S. Rose

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. Growing evidence indicates that occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is associated with an increased incidence of sarcoidosis. Yet a diagnosis of sarcoidosis rarely prompts investigation to identify preventable exposures. We sought to elucidate features that identify this important clinical syndrome of silicosarcoidosis. We assembled a multinational case series of workers with sarcoidosis who also reported occupational RCS exposure. We characterized clinical and histopathologic findings using a standardized instrument. We also assessed lung specimens using a novel quantitative microscopy technique to measure birefringent dust density in silicosarcoidosis cases and compared them to control groups. We identified 35 silicosarcoidosis cases (97% male, mean age 48 years) from the United States, Israel, and Taiwan who reported 21 ± 9 years of RCS exposure. On histology scoring, 25/29 (86%) had granulomas and 17/18 (94%) with evaluable lung tissue had lymphocytic inflammation and/or lymphoid aggregates. Common lung interstitial findings included silicotic nodules (39%), mixed-dust macules/nodules (44%), and birefringent dust (50%). Quantitative birefringent dust density was significantly greater (p < 0.001) in silicosarcoidosis cases compared with healthy controls (147 ± 179 vs. 12 ± 9 particles/mm2) but lower than in coal miners with silica-related progressive massive fibrosis (623 ± 777). We found significant differences in the frequency of histologic abnormalities in large versus small biopsy specimens, with fewer findings of RCS exposure in smaller tissue samples. The use of the term silicosarcoidosis should enhance recognition of this significant exposure-related granulomatous lung disease and will help guide clinical management that addresses exposure prevention in combination with appropriate pharmacologic treatment.

结节病是一种病因不明的多系统炎性疾病。越来越多的证据表明,职业性暴露于可吸入结晶二氧化硅(RCS)与结节病发病率增加有关。然而结节病的诊断很少促使调查以确定可预防的暴露。我们试图阐明识别这一重要临床综合征的矽肺结节病的特征。我们收集了一个多国家的结节病工人的病例系列,他们也报告了职业接触RCS。我们使用标准化仪器对临床和组织病理学结果进行了表征。我们还使用一种新的定量显微镜技术评估肺标本,以测量矽肺结节病病例的双折射粉尘密度,并将其与对照组进行比较。我们从美国、以色列和台湾发现35例矽肺结节病病例(97%为男性,平均年龄48岁),他们报告了21±9年的RCS暴露。在组织学评分上,25/29(86%)患者有肉芽肿,17/18(94%)可评估肺组织有淋巴细胞炎症和/或淋巴样聚集。常见的肺间质表现包括矽肺结节(39%)、混合粉尘斑/结节(44%)和双折射粉尘(50%)。与健康对照相比,矽肺结节病患者的定量双折射粉尘密度(147±179比12±9颗粒/mm2)显著高于健康对照(p < 0.001),但低于矽肺相关进行性块状纤维化矿工(623±777)。我们发现,在大组织活检样本和小组织活检样本中,组织学异常的频率有显著差异,而在小组织样本中,RCS暴露的发现较少。使用“矽肺结节病”一词应加强对这种与暴露相关的重要肉芽肿性肺病的认识,并将有助于指导临床管理,以结合适当的药物治疗来预防暴露。
{"title":"Silicosarcoidosis: Histologic and Clinical Features of an Occupational Granulomatous Disease","authors":"Jeremy T. Hua,&nbsp;Carlyne D. Cool,&nbsp;Einat Fireman Klein,&nbsp;Yochai Adir,&nbsp;Lukas J. Lee,&nbsp;Lauren M. Zell-Baran,&nbsp;Robert A. Cohen,&nbsp;Richard C. Kraus,&nbsp;E. Brigitte Gottschall,&nbsp;Silpa D. Krefft,&nbsp;Charles Van Hook,&nbsp;Cecile S. Rose","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23724","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23724","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sarcoidosis is a multisystem inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. Growing evidence indicates that occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is associated with an increased incidence of sarcoidosis. Yet a diagnosis of sarcoidosis rarely prompts investigation to identify preventable exposures. We sought to elucidate features that identify this important clinical syndrome of silicosarcoidosis. We assembled a multinational case series of workers with sarcoidosis who also reported occupational RCS exposure. We characterized clinical and histopathologic findings using a standardized instrument. We also assessed lung specimens using a novel quantitative microscopy technique to measure birefringent dust density in silicosarcoidosis cases and compared them to control groups. We identified 35 silicosarcoidosis cases (97% male, mean age 48 years) from the United States, Israel, and Taiwan who reported 21 ± 9 years of RCS exposure. On histology scoring, 25/29 (86%) had granulomas and 17/18 (94%) with evaluable lung tissue had lymphocytic inflammation and/or lymphoid aggregates. Common lung interstitial findings included silicotic nodules (39%), mixed-dust macules/nodules (44%), and birefringent dust (50%). Quantitative birefringent dust density was significantly greater (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) in silicosarcoidosis cases compared with healthy controls (147 ± 179 vs. 12 ± 9 particles/mm<sup>2</sup>) but lower than in coal miners with silica-related progressive massive fibrosis (623 ± 777). We found significant differences in the frequency of histologic abnormalities in large versus small biopsy specimens, with fewer findings of RCS exposure in smaller tissue samples. The use of the term silicosarcoidosis should enhance recognition of this significant exposure-related granulomatous lung disease and will help guide clinical management that addresses exposure prevention in combination with appropriate pharmacologic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 6","pages":"491-507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23724","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143939388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Occupational Exposure Patterns to Disinfectants and Cleaning Products and Its Association With Asthma Among French Healthcare Workers 法国卫生保健工作者对消毒剂和清洁产品的职业暴露模式及其与哮喘的关系
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23725
Bakari Ibrahim, Nicole Le Moual, Guillaume Sit, Marcel Goldberg, Bénédicte Leynaert, Céline Ribet, Nicolas Roche, Raphaëlle Varraso, Marie Zins, Rachel Nadif, Laurent Orsi, Orianne Dumas

Background

Disinfectants and cleaning products (DCPs) are important asthma risk factors among healthcare workers. However, healthcare work involves heterogenous cleaning tasks and co-exposure to many chemicals. These multidimensional aspects have rarely been considered. We aimed to identify patterns of occupational exposure to DCPs and study their associations with asthma.

Methods

CONSTANCES is a French population-based cohort of ≈220,000 adults. Current asthma and asthma symptom score were defined by questionnaire at inclusion (2012–2021). Healthcare workers completed a supplementary questionnaire on their current/last held occupation, workplace, and cleaning activities that were used in unsupervised learning algorithms to identify occupational exposure patterns. Logistic and negative binomial regression models, adjusted for potential confounders, were used to assess associations with asthma outcomes.

Results

In 5512 healthcare workers, four occupational exposure clusters were identified: Cluster1 (C1, 42%, reference), mainly characterized by low exposed nurses and physicians; C2 (7%), medical laboratory staff moderately exposed to common DCPs (chlorine/bleach, alcohol); C3 (41%), nursing assistants and nurses highly exposed to a few DCPs (mainly quaternary ammonium compounds); and C4 (10%), nurses and nursing assistants highly exposed to multiple DCPs (e.g., glutaraldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and acids). Among women (n = 3734), C2 (mean score ratio [95% CI]: 1.31 [1.02; 1.68]) and C3 (1.18 [1.03; 1.36]) were associated with higher asthma symptom score, and an association was suggested between C3 and current asthma (odds ratio 1.22 [0.99; 1.51]).

Conclusion

In a large population of healthcare workers, four DCP exposure patterns were identified, reflecting the heterogeneity of healthcare jobs. Two patterns, including one characterized by laboratory workers, were associated with greater asthma symptoms in women.

背景消毒剂和清洁产品(dcp)是卫生保健工作者中重要的哮喘危险因素。然而,医疗保健工作涉及不同的清洁任务和共同暴露于许多化学品。这些多维方面很少被考虑。我们的目的是确定职业暴露于dcp的模式,并研究它们与哮喘的关系。contes是一项以法国人口为基础的约22万成年人队列研究。纳入时(2012-2021)通过问卷确定当前哮喘和哮喘症状评分。医护人员完成了一份关于他们当前/上次从事的职业、工作场所和清洁活动的补充问卷,这些问卷用于无监督学习算法来识别职业暴露模式。采用逻辑回归模型和负二项回归模型,对潜在混杂因素进行校正,以评估与哮喘结局的关联。结果5512名医护人员共分为4个职业暴露聚类:第1类(C1, 42%,参考),以低暴露护士和医生为主;C2(7%),中等暴露于常见dcp(氯/漂白剂、酒精)的医务实验室工作人员;C3(41%),护理员和护士高度暴露于少数dcp(主要是季铵类化合物);和C4(10%),护士和护理助理高度暴露于多种dcp(如戊二醛、过氧化氢和酸)。女性(n = 3734), C2(平均评分比[95% CI]: 1.31 [1.02;1.68])和C3 (1.18 [1.03;1.36])与较高的哮喘症状评分相关,C3与当前哮喘存在关联(优势比1.22 [0.99;1.51])。结论在大量的卫生保健工作者中,确定了四种DCP暴露模式,反映了卫生保健工作的异质性。两种模式,包括一种以实验室工作人员为特征的模式,与女性更严重的哮喘症状有关。
{"title":"Occupational Exposure Patterns to Disinfectants and Cleaning Products and Its Association With Asthma Among French Healthcare Workers","authors":"Bakari Ibrahim,&nbsp;Nicole Le Moual,&nbsp;Guillaume Sit,&nbsp;Marcel Goldberg,&nbsp;Bénédicte Leynaert,&nbsp;Céline Ribet,&nbsp;Nicolas Roche,&nbsp;Raphaëlle Varraso,&nbsp;Marie Zins,&nbsp;Rachel Nadif,&nbsp;Laurent Orsi,&nbsp;Orianne Dumas","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23725","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23725","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Disinfectants and cleaning products (DCPs) are important asthma risk factors among healthcare workers. However, healthcare work involves heterogenous cleaning tasks and co-exposure to many chemicals. These multidimensional aspects have rarely been considered. We aimed to identify patterns of occupational exposure to DCPs and study their associations with asthma.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>CONSTANCES is a French population-based cohort of ≈220,000 adults. Current asthma and asthma symptom score were defined by questionnaire at inclusion (2012–2021). Healthcare workers completed a supplementary questionnaire on their current/last held occupation, workplace, and cleaning activities that were used in unsupervised learning algorithms to identify occupational exposure patterns. Logistic and negative binomial regression models, adjusted for potential confounders, were used to assess associations with asthma outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In 5512 healthcare workers, four occupational exposure clusters were identified: Cluster1 (C1, 42%, reference), mainly characterized by low exposed nurses and physicians; C2 (7%), medical laboratory staff moderately exposed to common DCPs (chlorine/bleach, alcohol); C3 (41%), nursing assistants and nurses highly exposed to a few DCPs (mainly quaternary ammonium compounds); and C4 (10%), nurses and nursing assistants highly exposed to multiple DCPs (e.g., glutaraldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and acids). Among women (<i>n</i> = 3734), C2 (mean score ratio [95% CI]: 1.31 [1.02; 1.68]) and C3 (1.18 [1.03; 1.36]) were associated with higher asthma symptom score, and an association was suggested between C3 and current asthma (odds ratio 1.22 [0.99; 1.51]).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In a large population of healthcare workers, four DCP exposure patterns were identified, reflecting the heterogeneity of healthcare jobs. Two patterns, including one characterized by laboratory workers, were associated with greater asthma symptoms in women.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 6","pages":"516-530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23725","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143939595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Work Stressors and Asthma in Female and Male US Workers: Findings From the National Health Interview Survey 美国女性和男性工人的工作压力和哮喘:来自全国健康访谈调查的结果
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-13 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23722
Adrian Loerbroks, Haiou Yang, Jos A. Bosch, Julia Salandi, Stefanie Keymel, Jian Li

Background

Prior work has linked work stressors to asthma. However, research related to gender-specific associations remains sparse and yielded mixed results. We aimed to address this gap.

Methods

We drew on cross-sectional data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey (individual-level response rate = 79.7%). Included were participants in employment who were aged 18–70 (n = 18,701). Work-to-family conflict, workplace bullying, and job insecurity were assessed as work stressors. Asthma was defined based on self-reports of a lifetime diagnosis by a doctor or other health professional. To account for the complex sampling design, variance estimation was used to compute weighted descriptive statistics and odds ratios (ORs) as well as corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable logistic regression. To test for interaction, interaction terms for work stressors and gender were included in additional models.

Results

In the full sample, work-to-family conflict, workplace bullying and job insecurity showed positive associations with asthma (OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 1.03–1.40; OR = 1.45, 95%CI = 1.17–1.80; and OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 0.99–1.45, respectively). We did not observe meaningful gender differences in the magnitudes of the ORs. All interaction terms were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Work stressors were positively associated with asthma, but there was no evidence of gender differences. Prospective studies are needed to determine the potential temporal relation of these associations.

先前的研究已经将工作压力源与哮喘联系起来。然而,与性别相关的研究仍然很少,结果好坏参半。我们的目标是解决这一差距。方法采用2015年全国健康访谈调查的横断面数据(个人回复率为79.7%)。纳入年龄在18-70岁的就业参与者(n = 18,701)。工作与家庭冲突、职场欺凌和工作不安全感被评估为工作压力源。哮喘的定义是基于医生或其他健康专业人员的终身诊断的自我报告。为了解释复杂的抽样设计,使用方差估计来计算加权描述性统计和比值比(or),并使用多变量逻辑回归计算相应的95%置信区间(ci)。为了检验相互作用,在附加模型中加入了工作压力源和性别的相互作用术语。结果在全样本中,工作-家庭冲突、职场欺凌和工作不安全感与哮喘呈正相关(OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 1.03-1.40;Or = 1.45, 95%ci = 1.17-1.80;OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 0.99-1.45)。我们没有观察到在ORs的大小上有意义的性别差异。所有相互作用项均无统计学意义。结论工作压力源与哮喘呈正相关,但无性别差异。需要前瞻性研究来确定这些关联的潜在时间关系。
{"title":"Work Stressors and Asthma in Female and Male US Workers: Findings From the National Health Interview Survey","authors":"Adrian Loerbroks,&nbsp;Haiou Yang,&nbsp;Jos A. Bosch,&nbsp;Julia Salandi,&nbsp;Stefanie Keymel,&nbsp;Jian Li","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23722","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23722","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Prior work has linked work stressors to asthma. However, research related to gender-specific associations remains sparse and yielded mixed results. We aimed to address this gap.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We drew on cross-sectional data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey (individual-level response rate = 79.7%). Included were participants in employment who were aged 18–70 (<i>n</i> = 18,701). Work-to-family conflict, workplace bullying, and job insecurity were assessed as work stressors. Asthma was defined based on self-reports of a lifetime diagnosis by a doctor or other health professional. To account for the complex sampling design, variance estimation was used to compute weighted descriptive statistics and odds ratios (ORs) as well as corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable logistic regression. To test for interaction, interaction terms for work stressors and gender were included in additional models.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the full sample, work-to-family conflict, workplace bullying and job insecurity showed positive associations with asthma (OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 1.03–1.40; OR = 1.45, 95%CI = 1.17–1.80; and OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 0.99–1.45, respectively). We did not observe meaningful gender differences in the magnitudes of the ORs. All interaction terms were not statistically significant.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Work stressors were positively associated with asthma, but there was no evidence of gender differences. Prospective studies are needed to determine the potential temporal relation of these associations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 6","pages":"508-515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23722","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143938867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exposure to Psychosocial Work Factors and Occupational Injury and Its Severity: Prospective Associations Among Employees in the French National Working Conditions Survey 暴露于社会心理工作因素和职业伤害及其严重程度:在法国国家工作条件调查中雇员的前瞻性关联
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-11 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23723
Sandrine Bertrais, Isabelle Niedhammer

Background

The few prospective studies on the associations between psychosocial work factors and occupational injury in the general working population provide little information on multiple exposures, injury severity, and gender differences. This study aimed to address these points.

Methods

The study was based on prospective data from the nationwide Working Conditions survey on a representative sample of the working population in France. A total of 17,486 employees (7302 men, 10,184 women) were followed over one or two 3-year periods from 2013 to 2019. Occupational exposures were measured at the beginning of each period and included 20 psychosocial work factors, 4 working time/hours factors, and 4 physical work factors. Logistic and Hurdle models were used to study their prospective associations with occupational injury and its severity, as assessed by work absence due to injury and its duration.

Results

Most psychosocial work factors predicted occupational injury. Almost all associations persisted in adjusted models, that is, after controlling for covariates and the other occupational factors that were also predictive of occupational injury. No gender differences were found for these prospective associations. For all types of occupational factors, dose–response associations were found between the number of exposures and injury. However, most occupational factors were not predictive of injury severity.

Conclusions

Occupational exposures, and psychosocial work factors in particular, predicted the occurrence of occupational injury more than its severity. Occupational injury prevention programmes should focus on various aspects of the work environment, including psychosocial work factors, and should particularly target multiple exposures.

背景:在一般工作人群中,关于社会心理工作因素与职业伤害之间关系的前瞻性研究很少提供关于多重暴露、伤害严重程度和性别差异的信息。本研究旨在解决这些问题。方法本研究基于法国全国工作条件调查的前瞻性数据,调查对象为具有代表性的工作人口样本。从2013年到2019年,共有17486名员工(7302名男性,10184名女性)在一到两个三年的时间里接受了跟踪调查。在每个时期开始测量职业暴露,包括20个心理社会工作因素、4个工作时间/小时因素和4个体力工作因素。使用Logistic和障碍模型来研究他们与职业伤害及其严重程度的潜在关联,评估工伤缺勤及其持续时间。结果社会心理因素对职业伤害的预测作用较大。在调整后的模型中,也就是说,在控制了协变量和其他也能预测职业伤害的职业因素之后,几乎所有的关联都存在。这些前瞻性关联没有发现性别差异。对于所有类型的职业因素,在暴露次数和伤害之间发现了剂量-反应关联。然而,大多数职业因素不能预测损伤严重程度。结论职业暴露尤其是心理社会因素对职业伤害发生的预测作用大于其严重程度。职业伤害预防规划应侧重于工作环境的各个方面,包括社会心理工作因素,并应特别针对多重暴露。
{"title":"Exposure to Psychosocial Work Factors and Occupational Injury and Its Severity: Prospective Associations Among Employees in the French National Working Conditions Survey","authors":"Sandrine Bertrais,&nbsp;Isabelle Niedhammer","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23723","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The few prospective studies on the associations between psychosocial work factors and occupational injury in the general working population provide little information on multiple exposures, injury severity, and gender differences. This study aimed to address these points.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study was based on prospective data from the nationwide Working Conditions survey on a representative sample of the working population in France. A total of 17,486 employees (7302 men, 10,184 women) were followed over one or two 3-year periods from 2013 to 2019. Occupational exposures were measured at the beginning of each period and included 20 psychosocial work factors, 4 working time/hours factors, and 4 physical work factors. Logistic and Hurdle models were used to study their prospective associations with occupational injury and its severity, as assessed by work absence due to injury and its duration.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Most psychosocial work factors predicted occupational injury. Almost all associations persisted in adjusted models, that is, after controlling for covariates and the other occupational factors that were also predictive of occupational injury. No gender differences were found for these prospective associations. For all types of occupational factors, dose–response associations were found between the number of exposures and injury. However, most occupational factors were not predictive of injury severity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Occupational exposures, and psychosocial work factors in particular, predicted the occurrence of occupational injury more than its severity. Occupational injury prevention programmes should focus on various aspects of the work environment, including psychosocial work factors, and should particularly target multiple exposures.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 6","pages":"543-551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23723","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143938745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1