Pub Date : 2025-09-10DOI: 10.1038/s43016-025-01225-9
Jing Yi, Shiyun Jiang, Dianna Tran, Miguel I. Gόmez, Patrick Canning, Jeffrey R. Bloem, Christopher B. Barrett
The traditional structural transformation narrative emphasizes intersectoral labour reallocation out of agriculture, ignoring whether workers exit agrifood value chains or merely migrate within them. Here we decompose multiregional input–output table data into industry- and country-specific annual labour value-added estimates by final consumer market segment, matching them with industry-specific employment data to estimate average worker compensation. Using data covering most of the global economy over 1993–2021, we report ten stylized facts about labour reallocation amid structural transformation. As incomes grow, labour exits primary production while downstream agrifood value chain segments maintain a steady economy-wide employment share—offering jobs that pay better than farm work. Women disproportionately move from primary production to downstream, consumer-facing retail and food service, whereas men migrate to better-paying midstream jobs, increasing gender pay inequality within the value chain. Employment shifts are strongly associated with changes in national per capita income, but not with agricultural total factor productivity growth. The traditional structural transformation narrative emphasizes intersectoral labour reallocation out of agriculture. This study presents ten stylized facts about how employment and compensation evolve within agrifood value chains amid structural transformation, offering insights into post-farmgate dynamics and gender pay inequality.
{"title":"Agrifood value chain employment and compensation shift with structural transformation","authors":"Jing Yi, Shiyun Jiang, Dianna Tran, Miguel I. Gόmez, Patrick Canning, Jeffrey R. Bloem, Christopher B. Barrett","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01225-9","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01225-9","url":null,"abstract":"The traditional structural transformation narrative emphasizes intersectoral labour reallocation out of agriculture, ignoring whether workers exit agrifood value chains or merely migrate within them. Here we decompose multiregional input–output table data into industry- and country-specific annual labour value-added estimates by final consumer market segment, matching them with industry-specific employment data to estimate average worker compensation. Using data covering most of the global economy over 1993–2021, we report ten stylized facts about labour reallocation amid structural transformation. As incomes grow, labour exits primary production while downstream agrifood value chain segments maintain a steady economy-wide employment share—offering jobs that pay better than farm work. Women disproportionately move from primary production to downstream, consumer-facing retail and food service, whereas men migrate to better-paying midstream jobs, increasing gender pay inequality within the value chain. Employment shifts are strongly associated with changes in national per capita income, but not with agricultural total factor productivity growth. The traditional structural transformation narrative emphasizes intersectoral labour reallocation out of agriculture. This study presents ten stylized facts about how employment and compensation evolve within agrifood value chains amid structural transformation, offering insights into post-farmgate dynamics and gender pay inequality.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"868-880"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145025584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-10DOI: 10.1038/s43016-025-01235-7
Upcycling of food waste and food processing by-products into animal feed presents a circular strategy to recycle nutrients for livestock production that would otherwise be lost. Scenario analyses based on an integrated environmental–economic modelling approach demonstrate that this upcycling has asymmetric effects on food security and environmental sustainability.
{"title":"Upcycling of food waste and food processing by-products into animal feed is not a panacea","authors":"","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01235-7","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01235-7","url":null,"abstract":"Upcycling of food waste and food processing by-products into animal feed presents a circular strategy to recycle nutrients for livestock production that would otherwise be lost. Scenario analyses based on an integrated environmental–economic modelling approach demonstrate that this upcycling has asymmetric effects on food security and environmental sustainability.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"835-836"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145025582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ten facts about agri-food value chains reshape our understanding of the food economy","authors":"Andrea Cattaneo","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01220-0","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01220-0","url":null,"abstract":"As economies develop, farm labour finds better-paid positions across expanding agri-food value chains — reshaping wages and gender roles.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"831-832"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145025583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1038/s43016-025-01221-z
Laura de Baan
Reducing the overconsumption of animal products can strongly reduce biodiversity impacts of diets.
减少动物产品的过度消费可以大大减少饮食对生物多样性的影响。
{"title":"How our diets drive biodiversity loss","authors":"Laura de Baan","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01221-z","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01221-z","url":null,"abstract":"Reducing the overconsumption of animal products can strongly reduce biodiversity impacts of diets.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"827-828"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145017476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1038/s43016-025-01232-w
Johan Swinnen
Global development financing is transforming alongside trade and political disruptions. We should focus on creating a more diverse and efficient food finance system, including repurposing public support and leveraging private investments, says Johan Swinnen.
{"title":"Financing food systems in times of global disorder","authors":"Johan Swinnen","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01232-w","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01232-w","url":null,"abstract":"Global development financing is transforming alongside trade and political disruptions. We should focus on creating a more diverse and efficient food finance system, including repurposing public support and leveraging private investments, says Johan Swinnen.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"819-820"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145017481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1038/s43016-025-01224-w
Thomas S. Ball, Michael Dales, Alison Eyres, Jonathan M. H. Green, Anil Madhavapeddy, David R. Williams, Andrew Balmford
Agriculturally driven habitat degradation and destruction is the biggest threat to global biodiversity. Yet the impact of different foods and where they are produced on species extinction risks, and the mitigation potential of different interventions, remain poorly quantified. Here we link the LIFE biodiversity metric—a high-resolution global layer describing the marginal impact of land use on extinctions of ~30,000 vertebrate species—with food consumption and production data and provenance modelling. Using an opportunity cost framing, we estimate that the impact of producing 1 kg of different food commodities on species extinction risks varies widely both across and within foods, in many cases by more than an order of magnitude. Despite marked differences in per capita impacts across countries, there are consistent patterns that could be leveraged for mitigating harm to biodiversity. In particular, animal products and commodities grown in the tropics are generally much more impactful than staple crops and vegetables. What we eat, as well as where and how it is grown, impacts species extinction risks through agricultural land use. Using a new global biodiversity impact data product, this study estimates how many species extinctions may potentially be caused by the production and consumption of different food types on a country-by-country basis.
{"title":"Food impacts on species extinction risks can vary by three orders of magnitude","authors":"Thomas S. Ball, Michael Dales, Alison Eyres, Jonathan M. H. Green, Anil Madhavapeddy, David R. Williams, Andrew Balmford","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01224-w","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01224-w","url":null,"abstract":"Agriculturally driven habitat degradation and destruction is the biggest threat to global biodiversity. Yet the impact of different foods and where they are produced on species extinction risks, and the mitigation potential of different interventions, remain poorly quantified. Here we link the LIFE biodiversity metric—a high-resolution global layer describing the marginal impact of land use on extinctions of ~30,000 vertebrate species—with food consumption and production data and provenance modelling. Using an opportunity cost framing, we estimate that the impact of producing 1 kg of different food commodities on species extinction risks varies widely both across and within foods, in many cases by more than an order of magnitude. Despite marked differences in per capita impacts across countries, there are consistent patterns that could be leveraged for mitigating harm to biodiversity. In particular, animal products and commodities grown in the tropics are generally much more impactful than staple crops and vegetables. What we eat, as well as where and how it is grown, impacts species extinction risks through agricultural land use. Using a new global biodiversity impact data product, this study estimates how many species extinctions may potentially be caused by the production and consumption of different food types on a country-by-country basis.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"848-856"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-025-01224-w.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145017483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1038/s43016-025-01230-y
Estimates of the biodiversity pressures associated with fruits and vegetables produced in or imported by the UK, India and South Africa show that there is no ‘best’ fruit or vegetable crop for both biodiversity and human health. Instead, the crop type along with its origin have the greatest effects on biodiversity pressure.
{"title":"Origin and crop type affect the biodiversity pressures of fruits and vegetables","authors":"","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01230-y","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01230-y","url":null,"abstract":"Estimates of the biodiversity pressures associated with fruits and vegetables produced in or imported by the UK, India and South Africa show that there is no ‘best’ fruit or vegetable crop for both biodiversity and human health. Instead, the crop type along with its origin have the greatest effects on biodiversity pressure.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"833-834"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144918971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Upcycling food waste and food processing by-products as animal feed could reduce livestock-related emissions, but rebound effects, where lower feed costs lead to livestock expansion, may diminish these benefits. Here, using an integrated environmental–economic model, we assess the impacts of this upcycling in China’s monogastric livestock production. We find that upcycling increases monogastric livestock production by 23–36% and raises total acidification emissions in China by 2.5–4.0%, while domestically total greenhouse gas emissions decrease by 0.5–1.4% through less waste sent to landfill and incinerators and a contraction in non-food production. This upcycling enhances food security and has substantial knock-on effects beyond the agricultural sectors, through influencing sectoral employment, gross domestic product and household welfare. Although emission taxes could absorb the rebound effects on emissions, they may also negatively impact food security and shift emissions abroad, depending on tax levels. A scenario analysis and integrated environmental–economic model demonstrate that repurposing food waste and food processing by-products for animal feed has asymmetric effects on food security and environment sustainability.
{"title":"Rebound effects may undermine the benefits of upcycling food waste and food processing by-products as animal feed in China","authors":"Weitong Long, Xueqin Zhu, Hans-Peter Weikard, Oene Oenema, Yong Hou","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01219-7","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01219-7","url":null,"abstract":"Upcycling food waste and food processing by-products as animal feed could reduce livestock-related emissions, but rebound effects, where lower feed costs lead to livestock expansion, may diminish these benefits. Here, using an integrated environmental–economic model, we assess the impacts of this upcycling in China’s monogastric livestock production. We find that upcycling increases monogastric livestock production by 23–36% and raises total acidification emissions in China by 2.5–4.0%, while domestically total greenhouse gas emissions decrease by 0.5–1.4% through less waste sent to landfill and incinerators and a contraction in non-food production. This upcycling enhances food security and has substantial knock-on effects beyond the agricultural sectors, through influencing sectoral employment, gross domestic product and household welfare. Although emission taxes could absorb the rebound effects on emissions, they may also negatively impact food security and shift emissions abroad, depending on tax levels. A scenario analysis and integrated environmental–economic model demonstrate that repurposing food waste and food processing by-products for animal feed has asymmetric effects on food security and environment sustainability.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"881-891"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144898815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1038/s43016-025-01222-y
Abbie S. A. Chapman, Rosemary Green, Genevieve Hadida, Harry Kennard, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, Pauline Scheelbeek, Carole Dalin
In many countries around the world, fruit and vegetable consumption must increase to improve human health, potentially pressuring local and global biodiversity. Here we use biodiversity-pressure metrics to compare the biodiversity pressures associated with fruits and vegetables consumed in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa. We found that biodiversity pressure for individual crops varies greatly with origin. In all three countries, imported fruits are typically associated with greater pressure than domestically grown fruits. Contrastingly, in India and South Africa, imported vegetables generally have a lower biodiversity pressure than domestically grown vegetables. Oranges, popular in the United Kingdom and South Africa, exert almost three times more biodiversity pressure than bananas—one of the most-consumed fruits in the United Kingdom and India. Our analysis illustrates the quantification of crop-specific biodiversity pressures and provides evidence for the development of more sustainable food systems. Increasing the consumption of specific food groups will be key for human health but might also lead to environmental impact. This study compares the biodiversity pressures associated with fruits and vegetables consumed in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa.
{"title":"Biodiversity pressure from fruit and vegetable consumption in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa varies by product and growing location","authors":"Abbie S. A. Chapman, Rosemary Green, Genevieve Hadida, Harry Kennard, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, Pauline Scheelbeek, Carole Dalin","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01222-y","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01222-y","url":null,"abstract":"In many countries around the world, fruit and vegetable consumption must increase to improve human health, potentially pressuring local and global biodiversity. Here we use biodiversity-pressure metrics to compare the biodiversity pressures associated with fruits and vegetables consumed in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa. We found that biodiversity pressure for individual crops varies greatly with origin. In all three countries, imported fruits are typically associated with greater pressure than domestically grown fruits. Contrastingly, in India and South Africa, imported vegetables generally have a lower biodiversity pressure than domestically grown vegetables. Oranges, popular in the United Kingdom and South Africa, exert almost three times more biodiversity pressure than bananas—one of the most-consumed fruits in the United Kingdom and India. Our analysis illustrates the quantification of crop-specific biodiversity pressures and provides evidence for the development of more sustainable food systems. Increasing the consumption of specific food groups will be key for human health but might also lead to environmental impact. This study compares the biodiversity pressures associated with fruits and vegetables consumed in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"892-905"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-025-01222-y.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144898743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-20DOI: 10.1038/s43016-025-01214-y
Jeroen Berden, Bernadette Chimera, Giles T. Hanley-Cook, Emine Koc Cakmak, Paolo Vineis, Genevieve Nicolas, Guri Skeie, Bernard Srour, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Mathilde Touvier, Julia Baudry, Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy, Justine Berlivet, Yvonne van der Schouw, Kris Murray, Franziska Jannasch, Anne Tjønneland, Cecilie Kyrø, Christina C. Dahm, Daniel Borch Ibsen, Charlotte Le Cornet, Matthias B. Schulze, Lorenzo Mangone, Chloé Marques, Elisabete Weiderpass, Alicia Heath, Gianluca Severi, Claire Cadeau, Ana Jiménez-Zabala, Barbara Sodano, Carlota Castro-Espin, Jesús Castilla, Kostas Tsilidis, María-Dolores Chirlaque, Maria-Jose Sánchez, Paolo Contiero, Salvatore Panico, Verena Katzke, Marc Gunter, Pietro Ferrari, Carl Lachat, Inge Huybrechts
Dietary diversity is vital for public health nutrition, yet the co-benefits of increasing dietary species richness (DSR) on human and environmental health remain unassessed. Here we explore associations between DSR and greenhouse gas emissions, land use, nutrient adequacy and mortality rates among European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study participants. Total DSR was positively associated with probability of adequate nutrient intake diet scores and inversely related to mortality rates; similar results were observed for plant DSR. Animal DSR was inversely associated with probability of adequate nutrient intake diet scores and neutrally associated with mortality rates. Neutral associations for total DSR and positive associations for animal DSR were found with greenhouse gas emissions and land use. Conversely, plant DSR was inversely associated with greenhouse gas emissions and land use. These findings from Europe suggest modest benefits of dietary plant biodiversity for nutrient adequacy and environmental health, with stronger inverse associations with mortality rates, while highlighting the potential adverse environmental impacts of diets rich in animal-sourced foods. An analysis of the EPIC study demonstrates that dietary plant biodiversity presents benefits for human and planetary health, but adverse environmental impacts are associated with dietary animal species richness.
{"title":"Biodiverse diets present co-benefits for greenhouse gas emissions, land use, mortality rates and nutritional adequacy in Europe","authors":"Jeroen Berden, Bernadette Chimera, Giles T. Hanley-Cook, Emine Koc Cakmak, Paolo Vineis, Genevieve Nicolas, Guri Skeie, Bernard Srour, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Mathilde Touvier, Julia Baudry, Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy, Justine Berlivet, Yvonne van der Schouw, Kris Murray, Franziska Jannasch, Anne Tjønneland, Cecilie Kyrø, Christina C. Dahm, Daniel Borch Ibsen, Charlotte Le Cornet, Matthias B. Schulze, Lorenzo Mangone, Chloé Marques, Elisabete Weiderpass, Alicia Heath, Gianluca Severi, Claire Cadeau, Ana Jiménez-Zabala, Barbara Sodano, Carlota Castro-Espin, Jesús Castilla, Kostas Tsilidis, María-Dolores Chirlaque, Maria-Jose Sánchez, Paolo Contiero, Salvatore Panico, Verena Katzke, Marc Gunter, Pietro Ferrari, Carl Lachat, Inge Huybrechts","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01214-y","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s43016-025-01214-y","url":null,"abstract":"Dietary diversity is vital for public health nutrition, yet the co-benefits of increasing dietary species richness (DSR) on human and environmental health remain unassessed. Here we explore associations between DSR and greenhouse gas emissions, land use, nutrient adequacy and mortality rates among European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study participants. Total DSR was positively associated with probability of adequate nutrient intake diet scores and inversely related to mortality rates; similar results were observed for plant DSR. Animal DSR was inversely associated with probability of adequate nutrient intake diet scores and neutrally associated with mortality rates. Neutral associations for total DSR and positive associations for animal DSR were found with greenhouse gas emissions and land use. Conversely, plant DSR was inversely associated with greenhouse gas emissions and land use. These findings from Europe suggest modest benefits of dietary plant biodiversity for nutrient adequacy and environmental health, with stronger inverse associations with mortality rates, while highlighting the potential adverse environmental impacts of diets rich in animal-sourced foods. An analysis of the EPIC study demonstrates that dietary plant biodiversity presents benefits for human and planetary health, but adverse environmental impacts are associated with dietary animal species richness.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 9","pages":"857-867"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144984085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：