首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Neurophysiology最新文献

英文 中文
Somatosensory evoked spikes in normal adults detected by magnetoencephalography 通过脑磁图检测正常成年人的体感诱发尖峰
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.006
Makoto Ishida, Yosuke Kakisaka, Kazutaka Jin, Akitake Kanno, Nobukazu Nakasato

Objective

Somatosensory evoked spikes (SESs) have been reported only in children aged under 14 years and are considered as an age-dependent phenomenon. However, we detected SESs in adult patients with epilepsy using magnetoencephalography (MEG). The present study investigated whether MEG can detect SESs in normal adults.

Methods

Spontaneous MEG was recorded during measurement of somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) for bilateral electrical median nerve stimuli in 30 healthy adults.

Results

Bilateral SESs were observed in 10 adults but none in the other 20 subjects. SESs consisted of one or two peaks, and the first peak latency corresponded to that of the second peak (M2) of SEFs. The first SES peak was identical to the M2 in isofield map pattern, as well as location and orientation of the equivalent current dipole (ECD). M2 ECD strength in the 10 subjects with SESs was larger (p <0.0001) than in 20 without SESs.

Conclusions

All-or-nothing detection of bilateral SESs by MEG in normal adults must depend on the signal-to-noise issue of symmetrical SEFs and background brain activity.

Significance

Our results further confirm the higher sensitivity of MEG compared to scalp EEG for the detection of focal cortical sources tangential to the scalp such as SESs.

目的据报道,只有 14 岁以下的儿童才会出现感觉诱发尖波(SES),而且这种现象与年龄有关。然而,我们利用脑磁图(MEG)在成年癫痫患者中检测到了 SES。本研究调查了脑磁图是否能检测到正常成人的 SES。方法在测量双侧正中神经电刺激的体感诱发电场(SEF)时,记录了 30 名健康成人的自发脑磁图。SES 由一个或两个峰值组成,第一个峰值的潜伏期与 SEF 第二个峰值(M2)的潜伏期一致。第一个 SES 峰在等场图模式、等效电流偶极子(ECD)的位置和方向上与 M2 峰相同。我们的研究结果进一步证实,与头皮脑电图相比,MEG 在检测与头皮相切的局灶性皮质源(如 SES)方面具有更高的灵敏度。
{"title":"Somatosensory evoked spikes in normal adults detected by magnetoencephalography","authors":"Makoto Ishida,&nbsp;Yosuke Kakisaka,&nbsp;Kazutaka Jin,&nbsp;Akitake Kanno,&nbsp;Nobukazu Nakasato","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Somatosensory evoked spikes (SESs) have been reported only in children aged under 14 years and are considered as an age-dependent phenomenon. However, we detected SESs in adult patients with epilepsy using magnetoencephalography (MEG). The present study investigated whether MEG can detect SESs in normal adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Spontaneous MEG was recorded during measurement of somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) for bilateral electrical median nerve stimuli in 30 healthy adults.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Bilateral SESs were observed in 10 adults but none in the other 20 subjects. SESs consisted of one or two peaks, and the first peak latency corresponded to that of the second peak (M2) of SEFs. The first SES peak was identical to the M2 in isofield map pattern, as well as location and orientation of the equivalent current dipole (ECD). M2 ECD strength in the 10 subjects with SESs was larger (p &lt;0.0001) than in 20 without SESs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>All-or-nothing detection of bilateral SESs by MEG in normal adults must depend on the signal-to-noise issue of symmetrical SEFs and background brain activity.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Our results further confirm the higher sensitivity of MEG compared to scalp EEG for the detection of focal cortical sources tangential to the scalp such as SESs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138824572400155X/pdfft?md5=7ddf1f3a1e7740061a378000cf892c5b&pid=1-s2.0-S138824572400155X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141141771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anatomo-electro-clinical substrates of stereoelectroencephalography recorded fixation-off sensitivity 立体脑电图记录的固定-关闭灵敏度的解剖-电子-临床基础
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.003
Ganne Chaitanya, Ramsha Malik, Cihan M. Kadipasaoglu, Stephen A. Thompson, Nitin Tandon, Sandipan Pati, Samden D. Lhatoo
{"title":"Anatomo-electro-clinical substrates of stereoelectroencephalography recorded fixation-off sensitivity","authors":"Ganne Chaitanya,&nbsp;Ramsha Malik,&nbsp;Cihan M. Kadipasaoglu,&nbsp;Stephen A. Thompson,&nbsp;Nitin Tandon,&nbsp;Sandipan Pati,&nbsp;Samden D. Lhatoo","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141040173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Instantly detecting absence seizures 即时检测失神发作
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.004
Flavia Davidhi, Filippo Costa, Georgia Ramantani, Johannes Sarnthein
{"title":"Instantly detecting absence seizures","authors":"Flavia Davidhi,&nbsp;Filippo Costa,&nbsp;Georgia Ramantani,&nbsp;Johannes Sarnthein","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140955483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Resting state electroencephalographic brain activity in neonates can predict age and is indicative of neurodevelopmental outcome 新生儿静息状态脑电图脑活动可预测年龄并预示神经发育结果
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.002
Amir Ansari , Kirubin Pillay , Emad Arasteh , Anneleen Dereymaeker , Gabriela Schmidt Mellado , Katrien Jansen , Anderson M. Winkler , Gunnar Naulaers , Aomesh Bhatt , Sabine Van Huffel , Caroline Hartley , Maarten De Vos , Rebeccah Slater , Luke Baxter

Objective

Electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to estimate neonates’ biological brain age. Discrepancies between postmenstrual age and brain age, termed the brain age gap, can potentially quantify maturational deviation. Existing brain age EEG models are not well suited to clinical cot-side use for estimating neonates’ brain age gap due to their dependency on relatively large data and pre-processing requirements.

Methods

We trained a deep learning model on resting state EEG data from preterm neonates with normal neurodevelopmental Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) outcomes, using substantially reduced data requirements. We subsequently tested this model in two independent datasets from two clinical sites.

Results

In both test datasets, using only 20 min of resting-state EEG activity from a single channel, the model generated accurate age predictions: mean absolute error = 1.03 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) and 0.98 weeks (p-value = 0.0001). In one test dataset, where 9-month follow-up BSID outcomes were available, the average neonatal brain age gap in the severe abnormal outcome group was significantly larger than that of the normal outcome group: difference in mean brain age gap = 0.50 weeks (p-value = 0.04).

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate that the deep learning model generalises to independent datasets from two clinical sites, and that the model’s brain age gap magnitudes differ between neonates with normal and severe abnormal follow-up neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Significance

The magnitude of neonates’ brain age gap, estimated using only 20 min of resting state EEG data from a single channel, can encode information of clinical neurodevelopmental value.

目的脑电图(EEG)可用于估算新生儿的生物脑龄。月经后年龄与脑龄之间的差异(称为脑龄差距)有可能量化成熟偏差。现有的脑年龄脑电图模型由于依赖于相对较大的数据和预处理要求,不太适合在临床婴儿床上用于估算新生儿的脑年龄差距。结果在这两个测试数据集中,仅使用来自单通道的 20 分钟静息态脑电图活动,该模型就生成了准确的年龄预测:平均绝对误差 = 1.03 周(p 值 = 0.0001)和 0.98 周(p 值 = 0.0001)。在一个有 9 个月 BSID 随访结果的测试数据集中,严重异常结果组的新生儿平均脑龄差距明显大于正常结果组:平均脑龄差距 = 0.50 周(p 值 = 0.04)。结论这些研究结果表明,深度学习模型适用于来自两个临床地点的独立数据集,而且该模型的脑年龄差距大小在神经发育随访结果正常和严重异常的新生儿之间存在差异。意义仅使用来自单通道的 20 分钟静息状态脑电图数据估算新生儿脑年龄差距的大小,可以编码具有临床神经发育价值的信息。
{"title":"Resting state electroencephalographic brain activity in neonates can predict age and is indicative of neurodevelopmental outcome","authors":"Amir Ansari ,&nbsp;Kirubin Pillay ,&nbsp;Emad Arasteh ,&nbsp;Anneleen Dereymaeker ,&nbsp;Gabriela Schmidt Mellado ,&nbsp;Katrien Jansen ,&nbsp;Anderson M. Winkler ,&nbsp;Gunnar Naulaers ,&nbsp;Aomesh Bhatt ,&nbsp;Sabine Van Huffel ,&nbsp;Caroline Hartley ,&nbsp;Maarten De Vos ,&nbsp;Rebeccah Slater ,&nbsp;Luke Baxter","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to estimate neonates’ biological brain age. Discrepancies between postmenstrual age and brain age, termed the brain age gap, can potentially quantify maturational deviation. Existing brain age EEG models are not well suited to clinical cot-side use for estimating neonates’ brain age gap due to their dependency on relatively large data and pre-processing requirements.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We trained a deep learning model on resting state EEG data from preterm neonates with normal neurodevelopmental Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) outcomes, using substantially reduced data requirements. We subsequently tested this model in two independent datasets from two clinical sites.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In both test datasets, using only 20 min of resting-state EEG activity from a single channel, the model generated accurate age predictions: mean absolute error = 1.03 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) and 0.98 weeks (p-value = 0.0001). In one test dataset, where 9-month follow-up BSID outcomes were available, the average neonatal brain age gap in the severe abnormal outcome group was significantly larger than that of the normal outcome group: difference in mean brain age gap = 0.50 weeks (p-value = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings demonstrate that the deep learning model generalises to independent datasets from two clinical sites, and that the model’s brain age gap magnitudes differ between neonates with normal and severe abnormal follow-up neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The magnitude of neonates’ brain age gap, estimated using only 20 min of resting state EEG data from a single channel, can encode information of clinical neurodevelopmental value.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001524/pdfft?md5=de1e91393c4d9b2edcdd51ab5a40241b&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724001524-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141032570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantitative EEG analysis of brivaracetam in drug-resistant epilepsy: A pharmaco-EEG study 双伐他塞坦在耐药性癫痫中的定量脑电图分析:药物脑电图研究
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.023
Lorenzo Ricci , Mario Tombini , Ersilia Savastano , Patrizia Pulitano , Marta Piccioli , Marco Forti , Biagio Sancetta , Marilisa Boscarino , Flavia Narducci , Oriano Mecarelli , Massimo Ciccozzi , Vincenzo Di Lazzaro , Giovanni Assenza

Objective

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a recent antiseizure medication (ASM) approved as an add-on therapy for people with focal epilepsy. BRV has a good efficacy and safety profile compared to other ASMs. However, its specific effects on resting-state EEG activity and connectivity are unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate quantitative EEG changes induced by BRV therapy in a population of adult people with drug-resistant epilepsy (PwE) compared to healthy controls (HC).

Methods

We performed a longitudinal, retrospective, pharmaco-EEG study on a population of 23 PwE and a group of 25 HC. Clinical outcome was dichotomized into drug-responders (i.e., >50% reduction in seizures’ frequency; RES) and non-responders (N-RES) after two years of BRV. EEG parameters were compared between PwE and HC at baseline (pre-BRV) and after three months of BRV therapy (post-BRV). We investigated BRV-related variations in EEG connectivity using the phase locking value (PLV).

Results

BRV therapy did not induce modifications in power spectrum density across different frequency bands. PwE presented lower PLV connectivity values compared to HC in all frequency bands. RES exhibited lower theta PLV connectivity compared to HC before initiating BRV and experienced an increase after BRV, eliminating the significant difference from HC.

Conclusions

This study shows that BRV does not alter the EEG power spectrum in PwE, supporting its favourable neuropsychiatric side-effect profile, and induces the disappearance of EEG connectivity differences between PwE and HC.

Significance

The integration of EEG quantitative analysis in epilepsy can provide insights into the efficacy, mechanism of action, and side effects of ASMs.

目的 布里瓦西坦(BRV)是最近被批准作为局灶性癫痫患者附加疗法的一种抗癫痫药物(ASM)。与其他抗癫痫药物相比,BRV具有良好的疗效和安全性。然而,它对静息态脑电图活动和连接性的具体影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 BRV 治疗对成年耐药性癫痫患者(PwE)与健康对照组(HC)诱导的脑电图定量变化。临床结果分为服用两年 BRV 后的药物应答者(即癫痫发作频率减少 50%;RES)和非应答者(N-RES)。比较了 PwE 和 HC 在基线(BRV 前)和 BRV 治疗三个月后(BRV 后)的脑电图参数。我们使用锁相值(PLV)研究了脑电图连接中与 BRV 相关的变化。与 HC 相比,PwE 在所有频段都表现出较低的 PLV 连接值。结论本研究表明,BRV 不会改变 PwE 的脑电图功率谱,支持其有利的神经精神副作用特征,并能促使 PwE 和 HC 之间的脑电图连接性差异消失。意义整合癫痫的脑电图定量分析可深入了解 ASM 的疗效、作用机制和副作用。
{"title":"Quantitative EEG analysis of brivaracetam in drug-resistant epilepsy: A pharmaco-EEG study","authors":"Lorenzo Ricci ,&nbsp;Mario Tombini ,&nbsp;Ersilia Savastano ,&nbsp;Patrizia Pulitano ,&nbsp;Marta Piccioli ,&nbsp;Marco Forti ,&nbsp;Biagio Sancetta ,&nbsp;Marilisa Boscarino ,&nbsp;Flavia Narducci ,&nbsp;Oriano Mecarelli ,&nbsp;Massimo Ciccozzi ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Di Lazzaro ,&nbsp;Giovanni Assenza","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Brivaracetam (BRV) is a recent antiseizure medication (ASM) approved as an add-on therapy for people with focal epilepsy. BRV has a good efficacy and safety profile compared to other ASMs. However, its specific effects on resting-state EEG activity and connectivity are unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate quantitative EEG changes induced by BRV therapy in a population of adult people with drug-resistant epilepsy (PwE) compared to healthy controls (HC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a longitudinal, retrospective, pharmaco-EEG study on a population of 23 PwE and a group of 25 HC. Clinical outcome was dichotomized into drug-responders (i.e., &gt;50% reduction in seizures’ frequency; RES) and non-responders (N-RES) after two years of BRV. EEG parameters were compared between PwE and HC at baseline (pre-BRV) and after three months of BRV therapy (post-BRV). We investigated BRV-related variations in EEG connectivity using the phase locking value (PLV).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>BRV therapy did not induce modifications in power spectrum density across different frequency bands. PwE presented lower PLV connectivity values compared to HC in all frequency bands. RES exhibited lower theta PLV connectivity compared to HC before initiating BRV and experienced an increase after BRV, eliminating the significant difference from HC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study shows that BRV does not alter the EEG power spectrum in PwE, supporting its favourable neuropsychiatric side-effect profile, and induces the disappearance of EEG connectivity differences between PwE and HC.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The integration of EEG quantitative analysis in epilepsy can provide insights into the efficacy, mechanism of action, and side effects of ASMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001470/pdfft?md5=9e66c64890de10fd7cd3920c42bb54ed&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724001470-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140918451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationship between event-related potentials and cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review 多发性硬化症患者的事件相关电位与认知功能障碍之间的关系:系统综述
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.024
Joana Almeida Ferreira , Nuno Pinto , Tiago Maricoto , Maria Vaz Pato

Objective

This systematic review aimed to evaluate if event-related potentials (ERPs) can be a relevant tool for cognitive dysfunction diagnosis in Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

Methods

Four databases were consulted (PubMed, Embase, Scielo, and Web of Science). The included studies should include adults with clear MS diagnoses, independently of having cognitive complaints, and all should have been submitted to ERPs (P300, N400 or mismatch negativity (MMN)). The main outcomes evaluated were ERPs’ amplitude and/or latency.

Results

425 studies were obtained initially from all databases, with 26 studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria. P300 was the most used ERP (25 studies), showing a reduced amplitude or an increased latency in 84% of those. N400 was evaluated in one study, showing also abnormal results. MMN was addressed in two studies with inconsistent findings. Some studies further suggest that ERPs may show earlier abnormal results compared with neuropsychological tests.

Conclusions

Most MS patient groups revealed ERP abnormalities, suggesting that these neurophysiological tests may be a relevant and appropriate diagnostic aid method for cognitive impairment in MS.

Significance

The use of ERPs in MS patients seems able to demonstrate cognitive impairment and its use should be considered as part of the regular patient evaluation.

目的 本系统综述旨在评估事件相关电位(ERPs)是否可作为诊断多发性硬化症(MS)认知功能障碍的相关工具。方法 查阅了四个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scielo 和 Web of Science)。所纳入的研究应包括明确诊断为多发性硬化症的成人,且不包括认知方面的主诉,所有研究都应进行过 ERP(P300、N400 或错配负性(MMN))检测。评估的主要结果是ERP的振幅和/或潜伏期。结果最初从所有数据库中获得了425项研究,其中26项研究符合资格标准。P300 是使用最多的 ERP(25 项研究),其中 84% 的研究显示振幅减小或潜伏期延长。一项研究对 N400 进行了评估,结果也显示异常。有两项研究对 MMN 进行了评估,但结果并不一致。一些研究进一步表明,与神经心理学测试相比,ERP 可能更早地显示出异常结果。结论大多数多发性硬化症患者组都显示出 ERP 异常,这表明这些神经生理学测试可能是多发性硬化症认知障碍的一种相关且适当的辅助诊断方法。意义在多发性硬化症患者中使用 ERP 似乎能够显示出认知障碍,应将其作为常规患者评估的一部分。
{"title":"Relationship between event-related potentials and cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review","authors":"Joana Almeida Ferreira ,&nbsp;Nuno Pinto ,&nbsp;Tiago Maricoto ,&nbsp;Maria Vaz Pato","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.024","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to evaluate if event-related potentials (ERPs) can be a relevant tool for cognitive dysfunction diagnosis in Multiple Sclerosis (MS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four databases were consulted (PubMed, Embase, Scielo, and Web of Science). The included studies should include adults with clear MS diagnoses, independently of having cognitive complaints, and all should have been submitted to ERPs (P300, N400 or mismatch negativity (MMN)). The main outcomes evaluated were ERPs’ amplitude and/or latency.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>425 studies were obtained initially from all databases, with 26 studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria. P300 was the most used ERP (25 studies), showing a reduced amplitude or an increased latency in 84% of those. N400 was evaluated in one study, showing also abnormal results. MMN was addressed in two studies with inconsistent findings. Some studies further suggest that ERPs may show earlier abnormal results compared with neuropsychological tests.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most MS patient groups revealed ERP abnormalities, suggesting that these neurophysiological tests may be a relevant and appropriate diagnostic aid method for cognitive impairment in MS.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The use of ERPs in MS patients seems able to demonstrate cognitive impairment and its use should be considered as part of the regular patient evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001494/pdfft?md5=495b8e2fe2ca3933a0d9e5ddd95afeb0&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724001494-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140948670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Muscle excitability testing 肌肉兴奋性测试
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.022
H. Tankisi , H. Bostock , S.V. Tan , J. Howells , K. Ng , W.J. Z'Graggen

Conventional electrophysiological methods, i.e. nerve conduction studies and electromyography are suitable methods for the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders, however, they provide limited information about muscle fibre membrane properties and underlying disease mechanisms. Muscle excitability testing is a technique that provides in vivo information about muscle fibre membrane properties such as membrane potential and ion channel function.

Since the 1960s, various methodologies have been suggested to examine muscle membrane properties but technical difficulties have limited its use. In 2009, an automated, fast and simple application, the so-called multi-fibre muscle velocity recovery cycles (MVRC) has accelerated the use of muscle excitability testing. Later, frequency ramp and repetitive stimulation protocols have been developed. Though this method has been used mainly in research for revealing disease mechanisms across a broad range of neuromuscular disorders, it may have additional diagnostic uses; value has been shown particularly in muscle channelopathies.

This review will provide a description of the state-of-the art of methodological and clinical studies for muscle excitability testing.

传统的电生理方法,即神经传导研究和肌电图是诊断神经肌肉疾病的合适方法,但它们提供的有关肌纤维膜特性和潜在疾病机制的信息有限。肌肉兴奋性测试是一种可提供肌纤维膜特性(如膜电位和离子通道功能)活体信息的技术。自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,人们提出了各种方法来检查肌肉膜特性,但技术上的困难限制了其应用。2009 年,一种自动、快速、简单的应用,即所谓的多纤维肌速度恢复循环(MVRC)加速了肌肉兴奋性测试的应用。后来,又开发了频率斜坡和重复刺激方案。虽然这种方法主要用于研究,以揭示各种神经肌肉疾病的发病机制,但它可能还有其他诊断用途;特别是在肌肉通道病方面,这种方法的价值已经显现。
{"title":"Muscle excitability testing","authors":"H. Tankisi ,&nbsp;H. Bostock ,&nbsp;S.V. Tan ,&nbsp;J. Howells ,&nbsp;K. Ng ,&nbsp;W.J. Z'Graggen","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.022","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conventional electrophysiological methods, i.e. nerve conduction studies and electromyography are suitable methods for the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders, however, they provide limited information about muscle fibre membrane properties and underlying disease mechanisms. Muscle excitability testing is a technique that provides <em>in vivo</em> information about muscle fibre membrane properties such as membrane potential and ion channel function.</p><p>Since the 1960s, various methodologies have been suggested to examine muscle membrane properties but technical difficulties have limited its use. In 2009, an automated, fast and simple application, the so-called multi-fibre muscle velocity recovery cycles (MVRC) has accelerated the use of muscle excitability testing. Later, frequency ramp and repetitive stimulation protocols have been developed. Though this method has been used mainly in research for revealing disease mechanisms across a broad range of neuromuscular disorders, it may have additional diagnostic uses; value has been shown particularly in muscle channelopathies.</p><p>This review will provide a description of the state-of-the art of methodological and clinical studies for muscle excitability testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001482/pdfft?md5=3608c79030d4d0133d7b44d0e3408e3d&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724001482-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141024658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Low-density EEG-based Functional Connectivity Discriminates Minimally Conscious State plus from minus 基于低密度脑电图的功能连接性可区分微意识状态的正负。
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.021
Sara Secci , Piergiuseppe Liuzzi , Bahia Hakiki , Rachele Burali , Francesca Draghi , Anna Maria Romoli , Azzurra di Palma , Maenia Scarpino , Antonello Grippo , Francesca Cecchi , Andrea Frosini , Andrea Mannini

Objective: Within the continuum of consciousness, patients in a Minimally Conscious State (MCS) may exhibit high-level behavioral responses (MCS+) or may not (MCS−). The evaluation of residual consciousness and related classification is crucial to propose tailored rehabilitation and pharmacological treatments, considering the inherent differences among groups in diagnosis and prognosis. Currently, differential diagnosis relies on behavioral assessments posing a relevant risk of misdiagnosis. In this context, EEG offers a non-invasive approach to model the brain as a complex network. The search for discriminating features could reveal whether behavioral responses in post-comatose patients have a defined physiological background. Additionally, it is essential to determine whether the standard behavioral assessment for quantifying responsiveness holds physiological significance. Methods: In this prospective observational study, we investigated whether low-density EEG-based graph metrics could discriminate MCS+/− patients by enrolling 57 MCS patients (MCS−: 30; males: 28). At admission to intensive rehabilitation, 30 min resting-state closed-eyes EEG recordings were performed together with consciousness diagnosis following international guidelines. After EEG preprocessing, graphs’ metrics were estimated using different connectivity measures, at multiple connection densities and frequency bands (α,θ,δ). Metrics were also provided to cross-validated Machine Learning (ML) models with outcome MCS+/−. Results: A lower level of brain activity integration was found in the MCS− group in the α band. Instead, in the δ band MCS− group presented an higher level of clustering (weighted clustering coefficient) respect to MCS+. The best-performing solution in discriminating MCS+/− through the use of ML was an Elastic-Net regularized logistic regression with a cross-validation accuracy of 79% (sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 85% respectively). Conclusion: Despite tackling the MCS+/− differential diagnosis is highly challenging, a daily-routine low-density EEG might allow to differentiate across these differently responsive brain networks. Significance: Graph-theoretical features are shown to discriminate between these two neurophysiologically similar conditions, and may thus support the clinical diagnosis.

目的:在意识的连续体中,处于微意识状态(MCS)的患者可能表现出高级行为反应(MCS+),也可能没有(MCS-)。考虑到不同群体在诊断和预后方面的固有差异,评估残余意识和相关分类对于提出有针对性的康复和药物治疗至关重要。目前,鉴别诊断主要依赖于行为评估,存在误诊风险。在这种情况下,脑电图提供了一种非侵入性的方法,可将大脑作为一个复杂的网络来建模。寻找辨别特征可以揭示昏迷后患者的行为反应是否有明确的生理背景。此外,还必须确定用于量化反应的标准行为评估是否具有生理意义:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,我们招募了 57 名 MCS 患者(MCS-:30 人;男性:28 人),研究基于低密度脑电图的图形指标是否能区分 MCS+/- 患者。入院接受强化康复治疗时,按照国际指南进行了 30 分钟静息态闭眼脑电图记录和意识诊断。在对脑电图进行预处理后,使用不同的连接度量,在多个连接密度和频带(α,θ,δ)上估算图的度量。此外,还为交叉验证的机器学习(ML)模型提供了指标,结果为 MCS+/-:结果:在 MCS- 组中,α 波段的大脑活动整合水平较低。相反,在 δ 波段,MCS- 组的聚类水平(加权聚类系数)高于 MCS+。通过使用 ML 对 MCS+/- 进行区分的最佳方案是弹性网络正则化逻辑回归,交叉验证准确率为 79%(灵敏度和特异度分别为 74% 和 85%):结论:尽管MCS+/-的鉴别诊断极具挑战性,但日常低密度脑电图可能有助于区分这些反应不同的大脑网络:意义:图形理论特征可区分这两种神经生理学上相似的病症,从而为临床诊断提供支持。
{"title":"Low-density EEG-based Functional Connectivity Discriminates Minimally Conscious State plus from minus","authors":"Sara Secci ,&nbsp;Piergiuseppe Liuzzi ,&nbsp;Bahia Hakiki ,&nbsp;Rachele Burali ,&nbsp;Francesca Draghi ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Romoli ,&nbsp;Azzurra di Palma ,&nbsp;Maenia Scarpino ,&nbsp;Antonello Grippo ,&nbsp;Francesca Cecchi ,&nbsp;Andrea Frosini ,&nbsp;Andrea Mannini","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong>: Within the continuum of consciousness, patients in a Minimally Conscious State (MCS) may exhibit high-level behavioral responses (MCS+) or may not (MCS−). The evaluation of residual consciousness and related classification is crucial to propose tailored rehabilitation and pharmacological treatments, considering the inherent differences among groups in diagnosis and prognosis. Currently, differential diagnosis relies on behavioral assessments posing a relevant risk of misdiagnosis. In this context, EEG offers a non-invasive approach to model the brain as a complex network. The search for discriminating features could reveal whether behavioral responses in post-comatose patients have a defined physiological background. Additionally, it is essential to determine whether the standard behavioral assessment for quantifying responsiveness holds physiological significance. <strong>Methods</strong>: In this prospective observational study, we investigated whether low-density EEG-based graph metrics could discriminate MCS+/− patients by enrolling 57 MCS patients (MCS−: 30; males: 28). At admission to intensive rehabilitation, 30 min resting-state closed-eyes EEG recordings were performed together with consciousness diagnosis following international guidelines. After EEG preprocessing, graphs’ metrics were estimated using different connectivity measures, at multiple connection densities and frequency bands (<span><math><mrow><mi>α</mi><mo>,</mo><mspace></mspace><mi>θ</mi><mo>,</mo><mspace></mspace><mi>δ</mi></mrow></math></span>). Metrics were also provided to cross-validated Machine Learning (ML) models with outcome MCS+/−. <strong>Results</strong>: A lower level of brain activity integration was found in the MCS− group in the <span><math><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow></math></span> band. Instead, in the <span><math><mrow><mi>δ</mi></mrow></math></span> band MCS− group presented an higher level of clustering (weighted clustering coefficient) respect to MCS+. The best-performing solution in discriminating MCS+/− through the use of ML was an Elastic-Net regularized logistic regression with a cross-validation accuracy of <span><math><mrow><mn>79</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> (sensitivity and specificity of <span><math><mrow><mn>74</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mn>85</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> respectively). <strong>Conclusion</strong>: Despite tackling the MCS+/− differential diagnosis is highly challenging, a daily-routine low-density EEG might allow to differentiate across these differently responsive brain networks. <strong>Significance</strong>: Graph-theoretical features are shown to discriminate between these two neurophysiologically similar conditions, and may thus support the clinical diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140954870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review of quantitative EEG findings in Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID 对纤维肌痛、慢性疲劳综合征和长 COVID 的定量脑电图结果进行系统回顾
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.019
Bárbara Silva-Passadouro , Arnas Tamasauskas , Omar Khoja , Alexander J. Casson , Ioannis Delis , Christopher Brown , Manoj Sivan

Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS), Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and Long COVID (LC) are similar multisymptom clinical syndromes but with difference in dominant symptoms in each individual. There is existing and emerging literature on possible functional alterations of the central nervous system in these conditions. This review aims to synthesise and appraise the literature on resting-state quantitative EEG (qEEG) in FMS, ME/CFS and LC, drawing on previous research on FMS and ME/CFS to help understand neuropathophysiology of the new condition LC.

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases for articles published between December 1994 and September 2023 was performed.

Out of the initial 2510 studies identified, 17 articles were retrieved that met all the predetermined selection criteria, particularly of assessing qEEG changes in one of the three conditions compared to healthy controls. All studies scored moderate to high quality on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. There was a general trend for decreased low-frequency EEG band activity (delta, theta, and alpha) and increased high-frequency EEG beta activity in FMS, differing to that found in ME/CFS. The limited LC studies included in this review focused mainly on cognitive impairments and showed mixed findings not consistent with patterns observed in FMS and ME/CFS.

Our findings suggest different patterns of qEEG brainwave activity in FMS and ME/CFS. Further research is required to explore whether there are phenotypes within LC that have EEG signatures similar to FMS or ME/CFS.

This could inform identification of reliable diagnostic markers and possible targets for neuromodulation therapies tailored to each clinical syndrome.

纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)、肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)和长COVID(LC)是类似的多症状临床综合征,但每个人的主要症状不同。关于这些病症的中枢神经系统可能发生的功能性改变,现有文献和新兴文献均有论述。本综述旨在综合和评估有关 FMS、ME/CFS 和 LC 的静息态定量脑电图(qEEG)的文献,借鉴以往对 FMS 和 ME/CFS 的研究,帮助理解 LC 这一新病症的神经病理生理学。我们在 MEDLINE、Embase、CINHAL、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 数据库中对 1994 年 12 月至 2023 年 9 月间发表的文章进行了系统检索。在最初确定的 2510 篇研究中,检索到 17 篇符合所有预定选择标准的文章,尤其是评估三种情况之一与健康对照组相比的 qEEG 变化的文章。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,所有研究的质量均为中上等。FMS患者的低频脑电图波段活动(δ、θ和α)普遍减少,高频脑电图β活动增加,这与ME/CFS患者的情况不同。本综述所包含的有限的LC研究主要集中于认知障碍,研究结果参差不齐,与在FMS和ME/CFS中观察到的模式并不一致。我们的研究结果表明,FMS 和 ME/CFS 的 qEEG 脑电波活动模式不同,需要进一步研究,以探索 LC 中是否存在与 FMS 或 ME/CFS 相似的脑电波特征表型。
{"title":"A systematic review of quantitative EEG findings in Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID","authors":"Bárbara Silva-Passadouro ,&nbsp;Arnas Tamasauskas ,&nbsp;Omar Khoja ,&nbsp;Alexander J. Casson ,&nbsp;Ioannis Delis ,&nbsp;Christopher Brown ,&nbsp;Manoj Sivan","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS), Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and Long COVID (LC) are similar multisymptom clinical syndromes but with difference in dominant symptoms in each individual. There is existing and emerging literature on possible functional alterations of the central nervous system in these conditions. This review aims to synthesise and appraise the literature on resting-state quantitative EEG (qEEG) in FMS, ME/CFS and LC, drawing on previous research on FMS and ME/CFS to help understand neuropathophysiology of the new condition LC.</p><p>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases for articles published between December 1994 and September 2023 was performed.</p><p>Out of the initial 2510 studies identified, 17 articles were retrieved that met all the predetermined selection criteria, particularly of assessing qEEG changes in one of the three conditions compared to healthy controls. All studies scored moderate to high quality on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. There was a general trend for decreased low-frequency EEG band activity (delta, theta, and alpha) and increased high-frequency EEG beta activity in FMS, differing to that found in ME/CFS. The limited LC studies included in this review focused mainly on cognitive impairments and showed mixed findings not consistent with patterns observed in FMS and ME/CFS.</p><p>Our findings suggest different patterns of qEEG brainwave activity in FMS and ME/CFS. Further research is required to explore whether there are phenotypes within LC that have EEG signatures similar to FMS or ME/CFS.</p><p>This could inform identification of reliable diagnostic markers and possible targets for neuromodulation therapies tailored to each clinical syndrome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001445/pdfft?md5=f2510dd0c4e9cf2fd262019a9774178c&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724001445-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141035925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Periodic discharges and status epilepticus: A critical reappraisal 周期性放电和癫痫状态:重要的重新评估
IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.018
Francesco Misirocchi , Pia De Stefano , Alessandro Zilioli , Elisa Mannini , Stefania Lazzari , Carlotta Mutti , Lucia Zinno , Liborio Parrino , Irene Florindo

Objective

Periodic Discharges (PDs) in Status Epilepticus (SE) are historically related to negative outcome, and the Epidemiology-based Mortality Score in SE (EMSE) identifies PDs as an EEG feature associated with unfavorable prognosis. However, supportive evidence is conflicting. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of interictal PDs during and following SE.

Methods

All 2020–2023 non-hypoxic-ischemic SE patients with available EEG during SE were retrospectively assessed. Interictal PDs during SE (SE-PDs) and PDs occurring 24–72 h after SE resolution (post-SE-PDs) were examined. In-hospital death was defined as the primary outcome.

Results

189 SE patients were finally included. SE-PDs were not related to outcome, while post-SE-PDs were related to poor prognosis confirmed after multiple regression analysis. EMSE global AUC was 0.751 (95%CI:0.680–0.823) and for EMSE-64 cutoff sensitivity was 0.85, specificity 0.52, accuracy 63%. We recalculated EMSE score including only post-SE-PDs. Modified EMSE (mEMSE) global AUC was 0.803 (95%CI:0.734–0.872) and for mEMSE-64 cutoff sensitivity was 0.84, specificity 0.68, accuracy 73%.

Conclusion

Interictal PDs during SE were not related to outcome whereas PDs persisting or appearing > 24 h after SE resolution were strongly associated to unfavorable prognosis. EMSE performed well in our cohort but considering only post-SE-PDs raised specificity and accuracy for mEMSE64 cutoff.

Significance

This study supports the utility of differentiating between interictal PDs during and after SE for prognostic assessment.

目的癫痫状态(SE)中的周期性放电(PDs)历来与不良预后有关,基于流行病学的 SE 死亡率评分(EMSE)将 PDs 识别为与不良预后相关的脑电图特征。然而,支持性证据并不一致。本研究旨在评估 SE 期间和之后发作间期 PD 的预后意义。方法回顾性评估了所有 2020-2023 年非缺氧缺血性 SE 患者在 SE 期间的脑电图。对 SE 期间(SE-PDs)的发作间期 PDs 和 SE 缓解后 24-72 小时内(SE-PDs 后)发生的 PDs 进行了检查。院内死亡被定义为主要结果。SE-PDs与预后无关,而SE后PDs与不良预后有关,这一点在多元回归分析后得到了证实。EMSE 全局 AUC 为 0.751(95%CI:0.680-0.823),EMSE-64 临界敏感性为 0.85,特异性为 0.52,准确性为 63%。我们重新计算了 EMSE 评分,其中仅包括 SE-PD 后的评分。结论SE期间的间歇性PD与预后无关,而SE缓解后24小时内持续或出现的PD与预后不良密切相关。EMSE在我们的队列中表现良好,但如果只考虑SE后的PD,则会提高mEMSE64临界值的特异性和准确性。
{"title":"Periodic discharges and status epilepticus: A critical reappraisal","authors":"Francesco Misirocchi ,&nbsp;Pia De Stefano ,&nbsp;Alessandro Zilioli ,&nbsp;Elisa Mannini ,&nbsp;Stefania Lazzari ,&nbsp;Carlotta Mutti ,&nbsp;Lucia Zinno ,&nbsp;Liborio Parrino ,&nbsp;Irene Florindo","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Periodic Discharges (PDs) in Status Epilepticus (SE) are historically related to negative outcome, and the Epidemiology-based Mortality Score in SE (EMSE) identifies PDs as an EEG feature associated with unfavorable prognosis. However, supportive evidence is conflicting. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of interictal PDs during and following SE.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All 2020–2023 non-hypoxic-ischemic SE patients with available EEG during SE were retrospectively assessed. Interictal PDs during SE (SE-PDs) and PDs occurring 24–72 h after SE resolution (post-SE-PDs) were examined. In-hospital death was defined as the primary outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>189 SE patients were finally included. SE-PDs were not related to outcome, while post-SE-PDs were related to poor prognosis confirmed after multiple regression analysis. EMSE global AUC was 0.751 (95%CI:0.680–0.823) and for EMSE-64 cutoff sensitivity was 0.85, specificity 0.52, accuracy 63%. We recalculated EMSE score including only post-SE-PDs. Modified EMSE (mEMSE) global AUC was 0.803 (95%CI:0.734–0.872) and for mEMSE-64 cutoff sensitivity was 0.84, specificity 0.68, accuracy 73%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Interictal PDs during SE were not related to outcome whereas PDs persisting or appearing &gt; 24 h after SE resolution were strongly associated to unfavorable prognosis. EMSE performed well in our cohort but considering only post-SE-PDs raised specificity and accuracy for mEMSE64 cutoff.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This study supports the utility of differentiating between interictal PDs during and after SE for prognostic assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001433/pdfft?md5=5bdf6952c670decf34d3068391a6b766&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724001433-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140902479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1