Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2026.104787
{"title":"Remerciements aux rédacteurs adjoints et aux experts","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jfo.2026.104787","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jfo.2026.104787","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14777,"journal":{"name":"Journal Francais D Ophtalmologie","volume":"49 1","pages":"Article 104787"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146073627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104727
F.I. Sozen-Delil, R. Donmez Gun
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We aimed to evaluate the anterior segment parameters and refractive changes after Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy (GATT).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 21 eyes of 19 patients with open-angle glaucoma who underwent at least 180° GATT between February 2022 and January 2024. The anterior segment parameters obtained using Sirius corneal topography (CSO, Italy) were retrospectively reviewed for the preoperative period and the 3rd postoperative month.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the study population, fourteen eyes were diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma, six with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, and one with pigmentary glaucoma. Compared to the preoperative period, the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of antiglaucomatous drugs (NAGD) used were significantly lower (23 [15–35] mmHg vs. 14 [7–19] mmHg, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001; 4 [1–4] vs. 0 [0–3], <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001, respectively). Compared to the preoperative period, there were significant increases in the postoperative anterior chamber angle (ACA) (38 [27–55]° vs. 52 [35–62]°, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), anterior chamber depth (ACD) (2.67 [1.93–3.82] mm vs. 3.36 [2.7–4.25] mm, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), and anterior chamber volume (ACV) (111 [87–208] mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 155 [110–252] mm<sup>3</sup>, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). No significant differences were detected in K1, K2, spherical equivalent (SE), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), or central corneal thickness (CCT) before and after GATT (<em>P</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our study, a decrease in IOP and the NAGD used, as well as an increase in ACA, ACD, and ACV, were observed after GATT compared to the preoperative period. The lack of changes in K1, K2, SE, BCVA, and CCT suggests that the surgery may be advantageous in these aspects.</div></div><div><h3>Objectif</h3><div>Nous avons souhaité évaluer les paramètres du segment antérieur et les changements réfractifs après une trabéculectomie transluminale assistée par gonioscopie (GATT).</div></div><div><h3>Matériels et méthodes</h3><div>Cette étude rétrospective, transversale et observationnelle a inclus 21 yeux de 19 patients atteints de glaucome à angle ouvert ayant bénéficié d’un GATT d’au moins 180° entre février 2022 et janvier 2024. Les paramètres du segment antérieur, obtenus à l’aide dutopographe cornéen Sirius (CSO, Italie), ont été analysés rétrospectivement pour la période préopératoire et le troisième mois postopératoire.</div></div><div><h3>Résultats</h3><div>Parmi ces yeux, quatorze ont été diagnostiqués avec un glaucome primitif à angle ouvert, six avec un glaucome pseudoexfoliatif et un avec un glaucome pigmentaire. Comparativement à la période préopératoire, la pression intraoculaire (PIO) postopératoire et
目的：评价经腔镜辅助下小梁切开术（GATT）后前段参数和屈光变化。材料和方法：这项回顾性、横断面、观察性研究包括19例开角型青光眼患者的21只眼，这些患者在2022年2月至2024年1月期间接受了至少180°GATT手术。利用Sirius角膜地形图（CSO, Italy）获得的术前和术后第3个月的前段参数进行回顾性分析。结果：在研究人群中，14只眼被诊断为原发性开角型青光眼，6只眼被诊断为假剥脱性青光眼，1只眼被诊断为色素性青光眼。与术前相比，术后眼压（IOP）和抗青光眼药物（NAGD）使用数量明显降低（23 [15-35]mmHg vs. 14 [7-19] mmHg, P3 vs. 155 [110-252] mm3， P=0.001）。GATT前后的K1、K2、球形当量（SE）、最佳矫正视力（BCVA）、角膜中央厚度（CCT）均无显著差异（P < 0.05）。结论：在我们的研究中，与术前相比，GATT术后IOP和使用的NAGD下降，ACA、ACD和ACV增加。K1、K2、SE、BCVA和CCT没有变化，提示手术在这些方面可能是有利的。
{"title":"Anterior Segment Changes after Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy (GATT) in Pseudophakic Patients with Open-angle Glaucoma","authors":"F.I. Sozen-Delil, R. Donmez Gun","doi":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104727","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104727","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We aimed to evaluate the anterior segment parameters and refractive changes after Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy (GATT).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 21 eyes of 19 patients with open-angle glaucoma who underwent at least 180° GATT between February 2022 and January 2024. The anterior segment parameters obtained using Sirius corneal topography (CSO, Italy) were retrospectively reviewed for the preoperative period and the 3rd postoperative month.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the study population, fourteen eyes were diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma, six with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, and one with pigmentary glaucoma. Compared to the preoperative period, the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of antiglaucomatous drugs (NAGD) used were significantly lower (23 [15–35] mmHg vs. 14 [7–19] mmHg, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001; 4 [1–4] vs. 0 [0–3], <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001, respectively). Compared to the preoperative period, there were significant increases in the postoperative anterior chamber angle (ACA) (38 [27–55]° vs. 52 [35–62]°, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), anterior chamber depth (ACD) (2.67 [1.93–3.82] mm vs. 3.36 [2.7–4.25] mm, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), and anterior chamber volume (ACV) (111 [87–208] mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 155 [110–252] mm<sup>3</sup>, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). No significant differences were detected in K1, K2, spherical equivalent (SE), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), or central corneal thickness (CCT) before and after GATT (<em>P</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our study, a decrease in IOP and the NAGD used, as well as an increase in ACA, ACD, and ACV, were observed after GATT compared to the preoperative period. The lack of changes in K1, K2, SE, BCVA, and CCT suggests that the surgery may be advantageous in these aspects.</div></div><div><h3>Objectif</h3><div>Nous avons souhaité évaluer les paramètres du segment antérieur et les changements réfractifs après une trabéculectomie transluminale assistée par gonioscopie (GATT).</div></div><div><h3>Matériels et méthodes</h3><div>Cette étude rétrospective, transversale et observationnelle a inclus 21 yeux de 19 patients atteints de glaucome à angle ouvert ayant bénéficié d’un GATT d’au moins 180° entre février 2022 et janvier 2024. Les paramètres du segment antérieur, obtenus à l’aide dutopographe cornéen Sirius (CSO, Italie), ont été analysés rétrospectivement pour la période préopératoire et le troisième mois postopératoire.</div></div><div><h3>Résultats</h3><div>Parmi ces yeux, quatorze ont été diagnostiqués avec un glaucome primitif à angle ouvert, six avec un glaucome pseudoexfoliatif et un avec un glaucome pigmentaire. Comparativement à la période préopératoire, la pression intraoculaire (PIO) postopératoire et","PeriodicalId":14777,"journal":{"name":"Journal Francais D Ophtalmologie","volume":"49 1","pages":"Article 104727"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104716
S. Partouche , C. Panthier , A. Saad , D. Gatinel
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy in terms of thickness of LASIK flaps created using the ELITA<sup>TM</sup> femtosecond laser (Johnson and Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc) compared to the intended thickness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, single-center study was conducted at the Institut Noemie de Rothschild (Paris, France) in patients eligible for bilateral LASIK surgery. The ELITA<sup>TM</sup> femtosecond laser was used to create all flaps, with an intended thickness of 110<!--> <!-->μm or 120<!--> <!-->μm. Flap thickness was measured manually by using images from two Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) devices: Anterion (Heidelberg Engineering), which uses a “Swept Source” technology, and Avanti (Optovue), which uses “Spectral Domain” technology. For each patient, two flap thickness measurements were obtained from the horizontal Anterion B-scan. Additionally, two Avanti scans, one horizontal and one vertical, were acquired per patient, with two flap thickness measurements recorded from each scan. Postoperative refractive and visual outcomes were also evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>30 eyes of 15 patients were included. 66.6% were female. The mean age of the patients was 31.4 years (range: 25 to 45 years). 48 Anterion measurements were obtained: mean flap thickness was 124.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12.3<!--> <!-->μm (range 101 to 157<!--> <!-->μm). 120 Avanti measurements were obtained: mean flap thickness was 115.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.7<!--> <!-->μm (range 92 to 132<!--> <!-->μm). The mean deviations between the achieved and attempted flap thickness were 8.38<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9<!--> <!-->μm by Anterion measurements and 6.67<!--> <!-->μm<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.72<!--> <!-->μm by Avanti measurements. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.05<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.43 diopters. The mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.99 (LogMar). No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ELITA femtosecond laser provides accurate and consistent LASIK flap thickness with excellent visual outcomes and no reported complications.</div></div><div><h3>Objectif</h3><div>Évaluer la précision de l’épaisseur des capots LASIK créés avec le laser femtoseconde ELITA<sup>TM</sup>(Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.) par rapport à l’épaisseur cible prévue.</div></div><div><h3>Méthodes</h3><div>Cette étude, rétrospective et monocentrique, a été menée à l’Institut Noémie de Rothschild (Paris, France) chez des patients éligibles à une chirurgie par LASIK bilatéral. Le laser femtoseconde ELITA<sup>TM</sup> a été utilisé pour créer tous les capots avec une épaisseur cible de 110<!--> <!-->μm ou de 120<!--> <!-->μm. L’épaisseur des capots a été mesurée en postopératoire à l’aide d’images provenant de deux dispositifs OCT : Anterion (Heidelberg Engineering) qui utilise une technologie « Swept-Source » et Avanti (Optovue) qui utilise une
目的：评估使用ELITATM飞秒激光（Johnson and Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc）制作的LASIK皮瓣厚度与预期厚度的准确性。方法：在法国巴黎Noemie de Rothschild研究所（Institut Noemie de Rothschild）对符合双侧LASIK手术条件的患者进行回顾性、单中心研究。使用ELITATM飞秒激光器制作所有皮瓣，其预期厚度为110μm或120μm。皮瓣厚度通过使用两个光学相干断层扫描（OCT）设备的图像进行手动测量：Anterion（海德堡工程公司）使用“扫描源”技术，Avanti （Optovue公司）使用“谱域”技术。对于每个患者，通过水平心房b扫描获得两个皮瓣厚度测量。此外，每位患者进行两次Avanti扫描，一次水平扫描，一次垂直扫描，每次扫描记录两次皮瓣厚度测量。术后屈光和视力结果也进行了评估。结果：纳入15例患者30只眼。66.6%为女性。患者平均年龄31.4岁（25 ~ 45岁）。48个心房测量值：皮瓣平均厚度为124.9±12.3μm（范围101 ~ 157μm）。获得120个Avanti测量值：皮瓣平均厚度为115.1±7.7μm（范围为92 ~ 132μm）。Anterion测得皮瓣厚度与尝试皮瓣厚度的平均偏差为8.38±9μm， Avanti测得皮瓣厚度的平均偏差为6.67±4.72μm。术后平均球面等效度为0.05±0.43屈光度。平均未矫正视力（UCVA）为0.99 （LogMar）。无术中、术后并发症发生。结论：ELITA飞秒激光提供准确一致的LASIK皮瓣厚度，视觉效果良好，无并发症报道。
{"title":"Analysis of flap morphology and visual outcomes using a new femtosecond-laser platform: An observational study","authors":"S. Partouche , C. Panthier , A. Saad , D. Gatinel","doi":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104716","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104716","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy in terms of thickness of LASIK flaps created using the ELITA<sup>TM</sup> femtosecond laser (Johnson and Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc) compared to the intended thickness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, single-center study was conducted at the Institut Noemie de Rothschild (Paris, France) in patients eligible for bilateral LASIK surgery. The ELITA<sup>TM</sup> femtosecond laser was used to create all flaps, with an intended thickness of 110<!--> <!-->μm or 120<!--> <!-->μm. Flap thickness was measured manually by using images from two Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) devices: Anterion (Heidelberg Engineering), which uses a “Swept Source” technology, and Avanti (Optovue), which uses “Spectral Domain” technology. For each patient, two flap thickness measurements were obtained from the horizontal Anterion B-scan. Additionally, two Avanti scans, one horizontal and one vertical, were acquired per patient, with two flap thickness measurements recorded from each scan. Postoperative refractive and visual outcomes were also evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>30 eyes of 15 patients were included. 66.6% were female. The mean age of the patients was 31.4 years (range: 25 to 45 years). 48 Anterion measurements were obtained: mean flap thickness was 124.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12.3<!--> <!-->μm (range 101 to 157<!--> <!-->μm). 120 Avanti measurements were obtained: mean flap thickness was 115.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.7<!--> <!-->μm (range 92 to 132<!--> <!-->μm). The mean deviations between the achieved and attempted flap thickness were 8.38<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9<!--> <!-->μm by Anterion measurements and 6.67<!--> <!-->μm<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.72<!--> <!-->μm by Avanti measurements. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.05<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.43 diopters. The mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.99 (LogMar). No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ELITA femtosecond laser provides accurate and consistent LASIK flap thickness with excellent visual outcomes and no reported complications.</div></div><div><h3>Objectif</h3><div>Évaluer la précision de l’épaisseur des capots LASIK créés avec le laser femtoseconde ELITA<sup>TM</sup>(Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.) par rapport à l’épaisseur cible prévue.</div></div><div><h3>Méthodes</h3><div>Cette étude, rétrospective et monocentrique, a été menée à l’Institut Noémie de Rothschild (Paris, France) chez des patients éligibles à une chirurgie par LASIK bilatéral. Le laser femtoseconde ELITA<sup>TM</sup> a été utilisé pour créer tous les capots avec une épaisseur cible de 110<!--> <!-->μm ou de 120<!--> <!-->μm. L’épaisseur des capots a été mesurée en postopératoire à l’aide d’images provenant de deux dispositifs OCT : Anterion (Heidelberg Engineering) qui utilise une technologie « Swept-Source » et Avanti (Optovue) qui utilise une","PeriodicalId":14777,"journal":{"name":"Journal Francais D Ophtalmologie","volume":"49 1","pages":"Article 104716"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104719
B. Omari , C. Khodriss , C. El Ouazzani , F. Bousgheiri , S. Lemrabett , M. El Bahloul
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine the accuracy of various biomechanical parameters, including the updated version of the stress–strain index (SSIv2), the Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF), and the Chinese Corvis Biomechanical Index (cCBI), in differentiating between normal corneas and keratoconus at different stages in a North African population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective observational case-control study included three groups: the normal group (100 eyes), moderate keratoconus group (KC grade 1: 56 eyes), and severe keratoconus group (KC Grade 2: 51 eyes). Each eye underwent Corvis ST examination to determine the stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), Ambrósio relational thickness (ARTh), integrated inverse radius (IIR), velocity at first applanation (velocity A1), biomechanical-corrected IOP (bIOP), tomographic and biomechanical index (TBI), CBI, and the new parameters SSIv2, CBiF, and cCBI. Comparison of biomechanical parameters between groups was performed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests (with <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05). The performance of these parameters was evaluated using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves by determining AUCs (Area Under the Curve), which were compared using DeLong's test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Before and after correction for age, central corneal thickness, and bIOP, most biomechanical parameters were significantly different among the three groups (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05). The TBI had the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.997) in detecting keratoconus, followed by the CBI (0.975), ARTh (0.948), and IIR (0.939). The CBI and ARTh presented the highest efficacy in differentiating between keratoconus severities (AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.861 and 0.850, respectively). CBiF and cCBI showed excellent ability to diagnose keratoconus (AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.937 and 0.933, respectively). SSIv2 demonstrated good potential (AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.796) for detecting keratoconus.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In a North African population, the TBI best distinguished keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, followed by the CBI and ARTh. CBiF, cCBI, and SSIv2 demonstrated excellent performance, albeit less so.</div></div><div><h3>Objectif</h3><div>Déterminer la performance des paramètres biomécaniques, incluant la version optimisée de l’indice Stress-Strain (SSIv2), le Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF) et le Chinese Corvis Biomechanical Index (cCBI), pour différencier, au sein d’une population nord-africaine, les cornées normales des kératocônes de différents stades.</div></div><div><h3>Matériels et méthodes</h3><div>Il s’agit d’une étude observationnelle prospective type cas-témoins incluant trois groupes : le groupe normal (100 yeux), le groupe kératocône modéré (KC grade 1 : 56 yeux) et le groupe kératocône sévère (KC grade 2 : 51 yeux). Chaque œil a bénéficié d’une imagerie par Corvis ST pour déterm
{"title":"Performance of new Corvis ST parameters in differentiating between healthy corneas and different stages of keratoconus in a North African population","authors":"B. Omari , C. Khodriss , C. El Ouazzani , F. Bousgheiri , S. Lemrabett , M. El Bahloul","doi":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104719","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104719","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine the accuracy of various biomechanical parameters, including the updated version of the stress–strain index (SSIv2), the Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF), and the Chinese Corvis Biomechanical Index (cCBI), in differentiating between normal corneas and keratoconus at different stages in a North African population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective observational case-control study included three groups: the normal group (100 eyes), moderate keratoconus group (KC grade 1: 56 eyes), and severe keratoconus group (KC Grade 2: 51 eyes). Each eye underwent Corvis ST examination to determine the stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), Ambrósio relational thickness (ARTh), integrated inverse radius (IIR), velocity at first applanation (velocity A1), biomechanical-corrected IOP (bIOP), tomographic and biomechanical index (TBI), CBI, and the new parameters SSIv2, CBiF, and cCBI. Comparison of biomechanical parameters between groups was performed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests (with <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05). The performance of these parameters was evaluated using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves by determining AUCs (Area Under the Curve), which were compared using DeLong's test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Before and after correction for age, central corneal thickness, and bIOP, most biomechanical parameters were significantly different among the three groups (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05). The TBI had the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.997) in detecting keratoconus, followed by the CBI (0.975), ARTh (0.948), and IIR (0.939). The CBI and ARTh presented the highest efficacy in differentiating between keratoconus severities (AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.861 and 0.850, respectively). CBiF and cCBI showed excellent ability to diagnose keratoconus (AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.937 and 0.933, respectively). SSIv2 demonstrated good potential (AUC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.796) for detecting keratoconus.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In a North African population, the TBI best distinguished keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, followed by the CBI and ARTh. CBiF, cCBI, and SSIv2 demonstrated excellent performance, albeit less so.</div></div><div><h3>Objectif</h3><div>Déterminer la performance des paramètres biomécaniques, incluant la version optimisée de l’indice Stress-Strain (SSIv2), le Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF) et le Chinese Corvis Biomechanical Index (cCBI), pour différencier, au sein d’une population nord-africaine, les cornées normales des kératocônes de différents stades.</div></div><div><h3>Matériels et méthodes</h3><div>Il s’agit d’une étude observationnelle prospective type cas-témoins incluant trois groupes : le groupe normal (100 yeux), le groupe kératocône modéré (KC grade 1 : 56 yeux) et le groupe kératocône sévère (KC grade 2 : 51 yeux). Chaque œil a bénéficié d’une imagerie par Corvis ST pour déterm","PeriodicalId":14777,"journal":{"name":"Journal Francais D Ophtalmologie","volume":"49 1","pages":"Article 104719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104744
A.M. Ahmed, R.A. Choudhury, C.L. Shields
{"title":"Complete involution of retinal hemangioblastoma with single session cryotherapy","authors":"A.M. Ahmed, R.A. Choudhury, C.L. Shields","doi":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104744","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104744","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14777,"journal":{"name":"Journal Francais D Ophtalmologie","volume":"49 1","pages":"Article 104744"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145827731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104710
M. Sanguino-Jaramillo , A. Domínguez-Vargas , J. Galeano-Lopez , G. Cadavía-Carrascal
<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are crucial for providing evidence-based recommendations to improve patient care. Over the past 30 years, CPG development has progressed, particularly in addressing variations in care. However, significant disparities remain, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This systematic review aims to evaluate the methodological quality of cataract-related CPGs published between 2000 and 2023 by using the AGREE II instrument.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search identified 11 CPGs meeting eligibility criteria, assessed across six domains: Scope and Purpose, Stakeholder Involvement, Rigor of Development, Clarity of Presentation, Applicability, and Editorial Independence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CPGs from the United States, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and Peru showed high scores in Rigor of Development and Scope and Purpose domains. Conversely, guidelines from Asia, Chile, and Mexico were not recommended due to deficiencies across multiple domains. Applicability emerged as the weakest domain across all CPGs, indicating challenges in translating guidelines into practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight variability in CPG quality, emphasizing the need for ongoing improvements, particularly in Stakeholder Involvement and Applicability domains. Continued efforts to enhance methodological rigor and practical applicability are crucial for improving quality of care in cataract management.</div></div><div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Les lignes directrices de pratique clinique (LPC) sont essentielles pour fournir des recommandations basées sur des preuves afin d’améliorer les soins aux patients. Au cours des 30 dernières années, le développement des LPC a progressé, notamment pour répondre aux variations dans les soins. Cependant, des disparités significatives persistent, en particulier dans les pays à revenus faible et intermédiaire. Cette revue systématique visait à évaluer la qualité méthodologique des LPC liées à la cataracte et publiées entre 2000 et 2023 en utilisant l’instrument AGREE II.</div></div><div><h3>Méthodes</h3><div>Une recherche exhaustive a identifié 11 LPC répondant aux critères d’éligibilité, évaluées dans six domaines : Portée et Objectifs, Implication des Parties Prenantes, Rigueur du Développement, Clarté de la Présentation, Applicabilité et Indépendance Éditoriale.</div></div><div><h3>Résultats</h3><div>Les LPC des États-Unis, du National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) et du Pérou ont obtenu des scores élevés dans les domaines Rigueur du Développement et Portée et Objectifs. En revanche, les lignes directrices d’Asie, du Chili et du Mexique n’ont pas été recommandées en raison de lacunes dans plusieurs domaines. L’applicabilité s’est révélée être le domaine le plus faible pour toutes les LPC, indiquant des défis dans la traduction des lignes directrice
{"title":"Evaluating the quality of cataract clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument","authors":"M. Sanguino-Jaramillo , A. Domínguez-Vargas , J. Galeano-Lopez , G. Cadavía-Carrascal","doi":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104710","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104710","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are crucial for providing evidence-based recommendations to improve patient care. Over the past 30 years, CPG development has progressed, particularly in addressing variations in care. However, significant disparities remain, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This systematic review aims to evaluate the methodological quality of cataract-related CPGs published between 2000 and 2023 by using the AGREE II instrument.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search identified 11 CPGs meeting eligibility criteria, assessed across six domains: Scope and Purpose, Stakeholder Involvement, Rigor of Development, Clarity of Presentation, Applicability, and Editorial Independence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CPGs from the United States, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and Peru showed high scores in Rigor of Development and Scope and Purpose domains. Conversely, guidelines from Asia, Chile, and Mexico were not recommended due to deficiencies across multiple domains. Applicability emerged as the weakest domain across all CPGs, indicating challenges in translating guidelines into practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight variability in CPG quality, emphasizing the need for ongoing improvements, particularly in Stakeholder Involvement and Applicability domains. Continued efforts to enhance methodological rigor and practical applicability are crucial for improving quality of care in cataract management.</div></div><div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Les lignes directrices de pratique clinique (LPC) sont essentielles pour fournir des recommandations basées sur des preuves afin d’améliorer les soins aux patients. Au cours des 30 dernières années, le développement des LPC a progressé, notamment pour répondre aux variations dans les soins. Cependant, des disparités significatives persistent, en particulier dans les pays à revenus faible et intermédiaire. Cette revue systématique visait à évaluer la qualité méthodologique des LPC liées à la cataracte et publiées entre 2000 et 2023 en utilisant l’instrument AGREE II.</div></div><div><h3>Méthodes</h3><div>Une recherche exhaustive a identifié 11 LPC répondant aux critères d’éligibilité, évaluées dans six domaines : Portée et Objectifs, Implication des Parties Prenantes, Rigueur du Développement, Clarté de la Présentation, Applicabilité et Indépendance Éditoriale.</div></div><div><h3>Résultats</h3><div>Les LPC des États-Unis, du National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) et du Pérou ont obtenu des scores élevés dans les domaines Rigueur du Développement et Portée et Objectifs. En revanche, les lignes directrices d’Asie, du Chili et du Mexique n’ont pas été recommandées en raison de lacunes dans plusieurs domaines. L’applicabilité s’est révélée être le domaine le plus faible pour toutes les LPC, indiquant des défis dans la traduction des lignes directrice","PeriodicalId":14777,"journal":{"name":"Journal Francais D Ophtalmologie","volume":"49 1","pages":"Article 104710"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145698100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：