首页 > 最新文献

Vaccine最新文献

英文 中文
Absenteeism related to respiratory infections among healthcare personnel in hospitals in Greece from 2020–2021 to 2024–2025 2020-2021年至2024-2025年期间,希腊医院保健人员因呼吸道感染而缺勤
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128264
Helena C. Maltezou , Theodoros V. Giannouchos , Maria N. Gamaletsou , Dimitra-Maria Koukou , Nikolaos Lemonakis , Flora Sourri , Emmanuela Peskelidou , Evanthia Botsa , Athanasia Lourida , Dimitrios Hatzigeorgiou , Periklis Panagopoulos , Nikolaos V. Sipsas

Aim

To study absenteeism among healthcare personnel (HCP) in Greek hospitals from 2020–2021 to 2024–2025.

Methods

Data were collected prospectively. Multivariable regressions were applied to estimate associations between variables, duration and cause of absenteeism.

Results

We studied 5525 absenteeism episodes with 38,482 days missed (17.8 episodes per 100 HCP; mean duration of absence per episode: 7.0 days). Compared to other seasons, the 2021–2022 season had the highest number of absenteeism episodes per 100 HCP (28.7) and the longest mean weekly duration of absence per 100 HCP (10.6 days per week) (p-value <0.001 for both). Causes of absenteeism were coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (61.8%), asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (10.4%), exposure to COVID-19 (8.3%), and influenza (5.2%). The incidence of COVID-19-related absenteeism declined overtime, while influenza-related absenteeism increased gradually. Compared to unvaccinated HCP, fully and partially COVID-19 vaccinated HCP had 2.58 and 2.08 fewer days of absence, and lower odds of COVID-19-associated absenteeism [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.36; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.26–0.51 and aOR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.33–0.67, respectively]. The full COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against absenteeism was 67.9% (95% CI: 64.0%–71.3%) and against COVID-19-related absenteeism was 55.8% (95% CI: 48.9%–61.8%). Influenza VE against influenza-related absenteeism was 44.8% (95% CI: 22.8%–60.6%).

Conclusions

COVID-19 was the main driver of absenteeism among HCP, however a gradual shift to influenza-related absenteeism occurred overtime. COVID-19 vaccination conferred protection against any absenteeism and against COVID-19-related absenteeism. Influenza vaccination significantly protected against influenza-related absenteeism. HCP should remain up-to-date with COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations to confer protection which can further safeguard healthcare facilities from absenteeism.
目的研究2020-2021年至2024-2025年希腊医院卫生保健人员(HCP)缺勤情况。方法前瞻性收集资料。应用多变量回归来估计变量、旷工时间和旷工原因之间的关联。结果我们研究了5525例缺勤病例,缺勤天数为38,482天(每100 HCP 17.8例,平均缺勤时间为7.0天)。与其他季节相比,2021-2022年季节每100 HCP旷工次数最多(28.7次),每周平均旷工时间最长(10.6天/周)(p值<;0.001)。旷工原因为冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)(61.8%)、无症状严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染(10.4%)、暴露于COVID-19(8.3%)和流感(5.2%)。随着时间的推移,与新冠肺炎相关的缺勤率逐渐下降,而与流感相关的缺勤率逐渐上升。与未接种HCP疫苗相比,完全接种和部分接种HCP疫苗的缺勤天数分别减少2.58天和2.08天,与COVID-19相关的缺勤率更低[校正优势比(aOR): 0.36;95%置信区间(CI): 0.26-0.51, aOR: 0.47;95% CI分别为0.33-0.67]。COVID-19疫苗对缺勤的完全有效性(VE)为67.9% (95% CI: 64.0%-71.3%),对COVID-19相关缺勤的完全有效性(VE)为55.8% (95% CI: 48.9%-61.8%)。流感VE预防流感相关缺勤率为44.8% (95% CI: 22.8%-60.6%)。结论新型冠状病毒肺炎是HCP缺勤的主要原因,但随着时间的推移,缺勤逐渐向流感相关的缺勤转变。COVID-19疫苗接种可防止任何缺勤和与COVID-19相关的缺勤。接种流感疫苗可有效预防流感相关缺勤。HCP应与COVID-19和流感疫苗保持同步,以提供保护,进一步保护卫生保健设施免受缺勤。
{"title":"Absenteeism related to respiratory infections among healthcare personnel in hospitals in Greece from 2020–2021 to 2024–2025","authors":"Helena C. Maltezou ,&nbsp;Theodoros V. Giannouchos ,&nbsp;Maria N. Gamaletsou ,&nbsp;Dimitra-Maria Koukou ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Lemonakis ,&nbsp;Flora Sourri ,&nbsp;Emmanuela Peskelidou ,&nbsp;Evanthia Botsa ,&nbsp;Athanasia Lourida ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Hatzigeorgiou ,&nbsp;Periklis Panagopoulos ,&nbsp;Nikolaos V. Sipsas","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128264","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128264","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To study absenteeism among healthcare personnel (HCP) in Greek hospitals from 2020–2021 to 2024–2025.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected prospectively. Multivariable regressions were applied to estimate associations between variables, duration and cause of absenteeism.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We studied 5525 absenteeism episodes with 38,482 days missed (17.8 episodes per 100 HCP; mean duration of absence per episode: 7.0 days). Compared to other seasons, the 2021–2022 season had the highest number of absenteeism episodes per 100 HCP (28.7) and the longest mean weekly duration of absence per 100 HCP (10.6 days per week) (<em>p</em>-value &lt;0.001 for both). Causes of absenteeism were coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (61.8%), asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (10.4%), exposure to COVID-19 (8.3%), and influenza (5.2%). The incidence of COVID-19-related absenteeism declined overtime, while influenza-related absenteeism increased gradually. Compared to unvaccinated HCP, fully and partially COVID-19 vaccinated HCP had 2.58 and 2.08 fewer days of absence, and lower odds of COVID-19-associated absenteeism [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.36; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.26–0.51 and aOR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.33–0.67, respectively]. The full COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against absenteeism was 67.9% (95% CI: 64.0%–71.3%) and against COVID-19-related absenteeism was 55.8% (95% CI: 48.9%–61.8%). Influenza VE against influenza-related absenteeism was 44.8% (95% CI: 22.8%–60.6%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>COVID-19 was the main driver of absenteeism among HCP, however a gradual shift to influenza-related absenteeism occurred overtime. COVID-19 vaccination conferred protection against any absenteeism and against COVID-19-related absenteeism. Influenza vaccination significantly protected against influenza-related absenteeism. HCP should remain up-to-date with COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations to confer protection which can further safeguard healthcare facilities from absenteeism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128264"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146025051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
VSA-2-, a novel plant-derived adjuvant for SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccine SARS-CoV-2亚单位疫苗的新型植物源佐剂VSA-2
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128255
Awadalkareem Adam , Christy Lee , Madison C. Jones , Brinley R. Harrington , Jing Zou , Bi-Hung Peng , Xuping Xie , Pengfei Wang , Tian Wang
QS-21, a key component of several licensed vaccines is facing limited supply, dose-limiting toxicity and other drawbacks which together limit its broader usage. Development of saponin alternatives to QS-21 that retain its desirable adjuvant activity without its drawbacks is in high need. Incorporating an amide side chain into the more sustainable Momordica saponins (MS) I and II led to the recent discovery of two semisynthetic immunostimulatory adjuvants VSA-1 and VSA-2. Here, we showed that SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding protein (RBD) adjuvanted with VSA-2 induced high titers of SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral and T helper-1 prone immune responses in mice comparable to that triggered by QS-21-RBD vaccination. Vaccination with VSA-2-RBD provided strong protection against SARS-CoV-2 and variants infection and the virus-induced lung inflammation and pathology similarly as QS-21-RBD vaccination. Overall, our results suggest that VSA-2 adjuvant can potentially complement the clinically proven saponin adjuvant QS-21 in vaccines against infectious diseases.
QS-21是几种获得许可的疫苗的关键组成部分,目前面临着供应有限、剂量限制性毒性和其他缺点,这些缺点共同限制了其更广泛的使用。目前迫切需要开发一种既能保留其佐剂活性又能消除其缺点的皂苷替代品。将酰胺侧链结合到更可持续的苦荞皂苷(MS) I和II中,导致最近发现了两种半合成免疫刺激佐剂VSA-1和VSA-2。在这里,我们发现vs2佐剂的SARS-CoV-2受体结合蛋白(RBD)在小鼠中诱导了高滴度的SARS-CoV-2特异性体液和T助剂-1倾向免疫反应,与QS-21-RBD疫苗引发的免疫反应相当。接种VSA-2-RBD对SARS-CoV-2及其变体感染以及病毒诱导的肺部炎症和病理具有很强的保护作用,与接种QS-21-RBD相似。总之,我们的研究结果表明,VSA-2佐剂可以潜在地补充临床证实的皂苷佐剂QS-21在感染性疾病疫苗中的作用。
{"title":"VSA-2-, a novel plant-derived adjuvant for SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccine","authors":"Awadalkareem Adam ,&nbsp;Christy Lee ,&nbsp;Madison C. Jones ,&nbsp;Brinley R. Harrington ,&nbsp;Jing Zou ,&nbsp;Bi-Hung Peng ,&nbsp;Xuping Xie ,&nbsp;Pengfei Wang ,&nbsp;Tian Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128255","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128255","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>QS-21, a key component of several licensed vaccines is facing limited supply, dose-limiting toxicity and other drawbacks which together limit its broader usage. Development of saponin alternatives to QS-21 that retain its desirable adjuvant activity without its drawbacks is in high need. Incorporating an amide side chain into the more sustainable <em>Momordica</em> saponins (MS) I and II led to the recent discovery of two semisynthetic immunostimulatory adjuvants VSA-1 and VSA-2. Here, we showed that SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding protein (RBD) adjuvanted with VSA-2 induced high titers of SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral and T helper-1 prone immune responses in mice comparable to that triggered by QS-21-RBD vaccination. Vaccination with VSA-2-RBD provided strong protection against SARS-CoV-2 and variants infection and the virus-induced lung inflammation and pathology similarly as QS-21-RBD vaccination. Overall, our results suggest that VSA-2 adjuvant can potentially complement the clinically proven saponin adjuvant QS-21 in vaccines against infectious diseases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring regional variations in the provision of influenza vaccination in Italy 探索意大利提供流感疫苗的区域差异
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128266
Fabio Contarino , Claudio Fiorilla , Francesca Bella , Andrea Orsi , Antonio Mistretta , Giancarlo Icardi

Background

Influenza remains a major global public health concern, particularly affecting high-risk populations and straining healthcare systems. Vaccination coverage in Italy remains suboptimal, with wide regional variability. This study explores regional differences in the provision of influenza vaccination in Italy's decentralized health system, based on official regional circulars and institutional documents.

Materials and methods

Information on the vaccination campaigns was collected from official regional circulars and institutional documents, obtained via institutional websites or direct contact with regional Prevention Departments. A structured grid guided the extraction and comparison of key elements, including vaccine types, prioritized risk groups, additional coverage indicators, and procurement volumes. Vaccination coverage data were used for contextual and comparative purposes.

Results

Marked regional heterogeneity was observed in vaccine procurement and campaign planning. Ten regions procured all five authorized influenza vaccine types, while others omitted one or more. Several regions introduced additional coverage targets and prioritized specific high-risk populations. Reported procurement volumes varied widely, with an almost twofold difference between the regions at the extremes.

Conclusions

This study highlights substantial regional heterogeneity in the implementation of the 2024/2025 influenza vaccination campaign in Italy, particularly in vaccine selection, prioritization strategies, and coverage targets. Regions with clearly defined temporal priorities and additional objectives tended to achieve higher vaccination coverage. Despite differences, common structural elements, such as the central role of Prevention Departments and involvement of general practitioners, were observed. Findings underscore the need for harmonized yet context-sensitive immunization policies in decentralized healthcare systems.
流感仍然是一个主要的全球公共卫生问题,尤其影响高危人群并使卫生保健系统紧张。意大利的疫苗接种覆盖率仍然不够理想,区域差异很大。本研究基于官方区域通告和机构文件,探讨了意大利分散式卫生系统中流感疫苗接种的区域差异。材料和方法从官方的区域通告和机构文件中收集疫苗接种运动的信息,通过机构网站或直接与区域预防部门联系获得。一个结构化网格指导提取和比较关键要素,包括疫苗类型、优先风险群体、额外的覆盖指标和采购量。疫苗接种覆盖率数据用于背景和比较目的。结果在疫苗采购和运动规划方面存在明显的区域异质性。10个区域采购了所有五种授权流感疫苗,而其他区域遗漏了一种或多种。一些区域提出了额外的覆盖目标,并优先考虑特定的高危人群。报告的采购量差别很大,在极端情况下,各区域之间几乎相差两倍。本研究强调了意大利在实施2024/2025年流感疫苗接种运动方面存在重大的区域异质性,特别是在疫苗选择、优先策略和覆盖目标方面。具有明确确定的时间重点和额外目标的区域往往实现更高的疫苗接种覆盖率。尽管存在差异,但观察到共同的结构要素,例如预防部门的中心作用和全科医生的参与。调查结果强调需要在分散的卫生保健系统中制定统一但对环境敏感的免疫政策。
{"title":"Exploring regional variations in the provision of influenza vaccination in Italy","authors":"Fabio Contarino ,&nbsp;Claudio Fiorilla ,&nbsp;Francesca Bella ,&nbsp;Andrea Orsi ,&nbsp;Antonio Mistretta ,&nbsp;Giancarlo Icardi","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128266","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128266","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Influenza remains a major global public health concern, particularly affecting high-risk populations and straining healthcare systems. Vaccination coverage in Italy remains suboptimal, with wide regional variability. This study explores regional differences in the provision of influenza vaccination in Italy's decentralized health system, based on official regional circulars and institutional documents.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Information on the vaccination campaigns was collected from official regional circulars and institutional documents, obtained via institutional websites or direct contact with regional Prevention Departments. A structured grid guided the extraction and comparison of key elements, including vaccine types, prioritized risk groups, additional coverage indicators, and procurement volumes. Vaccination coverage data were used for contextual and comparative purposes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Marked regional heterogeneity was observed in vaccine procurement and campaign planning. Ten regions procured all five authorized influenza vaccine types, while others omitted one or more. Several regions introduced additional coverage targets and prioritized specific high-risk populations. Reported procurement volumes varied widely, with an almost twofold difference between the regions at the extremes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights substantial regional heterogeneity in the implementation of the 2024/2025 influenza vaccination campaign in Italy, particularly in vaccine selection, prioritization strategies, and coverage targets. Regions with clearly defined temporal priorities and additional objectives tended to achieve higher vaccination coverage. Despite differences, common structural elements, such as the central role of Prevention Departments and involvement of general practitioners, were observed. Findings underscore the need for harmonized yet context-sensitive immunization policies in decentralized healthcare systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128266"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and immunogenicity of a 25-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in pneumococcal vaccine-naive healthy adults: Results from 2 randomised, controlled clinical trials 25价肺炎球菌结合疫苗在未接种肺炎球菌疫苗的健康成人中的安全性和免疫原性:来自2个随机对照临床试验的结果
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128236
Joanne M. Langley , Manish Sadarangani , Christian Ockenhouse , Luis Barreto , Lingyun Ye , Yuxiao Tang , Janis L. Breeze , Jodi Feser , Nancy A. Hosken , Indah Andi-Lolo , Sybil A. Tasker , Scott A. Halperin , the Canadian Immunization Research Network

Background

Pneumococcus causes substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide in children under 5. IVT PCV-25 is a 25-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV25) designed to prevent invasive pneumococcal disease from the serotypes predominant in children, particularly in low and middle income countries (LMICs).

Methods

We completed 2 randomised, parallel-group, double-blind clinical trials in Canada to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a single IM dose of PCV25 in healthy adults who had no history of pneumococcal vaccination or microbiologically confirmed IPD. PCV20 (Prevnar 20) was the control. In CVIA 096, 30 participants per group were randomised to PCV25 at a dose similar to PCV 20 (2.2 μg for each serotype polysaccharide (except 4.4 μg for serotype 6B) with 125 μg aluminium as aluminium phosphate (2.2/125)) or PCV20. Potentially more immunogenic formulations with higher polysaccharide and/or aluminium phosphate dose were evaluated in CVIA105, where 40 participants were randomised to PCV25 (2.2/125), 60 to PCV25 (2.2/250), 80 to PCV25 (4.4/250), and 40 to PCV20.

Results

Most participants were female and white. All participants were included in the safety analyses. One participant in CVIA 096 and 6 participants in CVIA 105 were excluded from the immunogenicity analyses because of protocol deviations that might interfere with immune response. Solicited and unsolicited AE profiles were similar for PCV25 and PCV20. No Grade 4 events were reported. At the highest dose, PCV25 elicited IgG and OPA responses with GMFRs of ≥2 for all 25 serotypes and for serotype 6A except for OPA response to 35B.

Conclusions

Multiple formulations of IVT PCV-25, a vaccine designed to cover pneumococcal serotypes prevalent in LMICs, were well tolerated and immunogenic in healthy adults. As adult immunogenicity is not fully predictive for infants, further development will evaluate safety and immunogenicity in the target infant population.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05540028, NCT06077656
肺炎球菌在全球5岁以下儿童中引起大量发病率和死亡率。IVT PCV-25是一种25价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV25),旨在预防儿童中主要的血清型侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病,特别是在中低收入国家(LMICs)。方法:我们在加拿大完成了2项随机、平行组、双盲临床试验,以评估PCV25单剂量IM在没有肺炎球菌疫苗接种史或微生物学证实的IPD的健康成人中的安全性和免疫原性。PCV20 (Prevnar 20)作为对照。在CVIA 096中,每组30名参与者被随机分配到PCV25,剂量与PCV20相似(每种血清型多糖2.2 μg(血清型6B 4.4 μg除外),125 μg铝为磷酸铝(2.2/125))或PCV20。在CVIA105中评估了具有更高多糖和/或磷酸铝剂量的潜在免疫原性配方,其中40名参与者随机分配到PCV25(2.2/125), 60名到PCV25(2.2/250), 80名到PCV25(4.4/250)和40名到PCV20。结果大多数参与者是女性和白人。所有参与者都被纳入安全性分析。CVIA 096的1名参与者和CVIA 105的6名参与者因可能干扰免疫应答的方案偏差而被排除在免疫原性分析之外。PCV25和PCV20的主动和非主动AE配置文件相似。未报告4级事件。在最高剂量下,PCV25在所有25种血清型和6A血清型中均引起IgG和OPA应答,GMFRs≥2,但对35B血清型的OPA应答除外。结论IVT PCV-25疫苗是一种设计用于覆盖低收入国家流行的肺炎球菌血清型的疫苗,多种配方在健康成人中具有良好的耐受性和免疫原性。由于成人免疫原性不能完全预测婴儿的免疫原性,因此进一步的研究将评估该药物在目标婴儿人群中的安全性和免疫原性
{"title":"Safety and immunogenicity of a 25-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in pneumococcal vaccine-naive healthy adults: Results from 2 randomised, controlled clinical trials","authors":"Joanne M. Langley ,&nbsp;Manish Sadarangani ,&nbsp;Christian Ockenhouse ,&nbsp;Luis Barreto ,&nbsp;Lingyun Ye ,&nbsp;Yuxiao Tang ,&nbsp;Janis L. Breeze ,&nbsp;Jodi Feser ,&nbsp;Nancy A. Hosken ,&nbsp;Indah Andi-Lolo ,&nbsp;Sybil A. Tasker ,&nbsp;Scott A. Halperin ,&nbsp;the Canadian Immunization Research Network","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128236","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128236","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pneumococcus causes substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide in children under 5. IVT PCV-25 is a 25-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV25) designed to prevent invasive pneumococcal disease from the serotypes predominant in children, particularly in low and middle income countries (LMICs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We completed 2 randomised, parallel-group, double-blind clinical trials in Canada to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a single IM dose of PCV25 in healthy adults who had no history of pneumococcal vaccination or microbiologically confirmed IPD. PCV20 (Prevnar 20) was the control. In CVIA 096, 30 participants per group were randomised to PCV25 at a dose similar to PCV 20 (2.2 μg for each serotype polysaccharide (except 4.4 μg for serotype 6B) with 125 μg aluminium as aluminium phosphate (2.2/125)) or PCV20. Potentially more immunogenic formulations with higher polysaccharide and/or aluminium phosphate dose were evaluated in CVIA105, where 40 participants were randomised to PCV25 (2.2/125), 60 to PCV25 (2.2/250), 80 to PCV25 (4.4/250), and 40 to PCV20.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most participants were female and white. All participants were included in the safety analyses. One participant in CVIA 096 and 6 participants in CVIA 105 were excluded from the immunogenicity analyses because of protocol deviations that might interfere with immune response. Solicited and unsolicited AE profiles were similar for PCV25 and PCV20. No Grade 4 events were reported. At the highest dose, PCV25 elicited IgG and OPA responses with GMFRs of ≥2 for all 25 serotypes and for serotype 6A except for OPA response to 35B.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Multiple formulations of IVT PCV-25, a vaccine designed to cover pneumococcal serotypes prevalent in LMICs, were well tolerated and immunogenic in healthy adults. As adult immunogenicity is not fully predictive for infants, further development will evaluate safety and immunogenicity in the target infant population.</div><div><span><span><em>ClinicalTrials.gov</em></span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span><em>NCT05540028</em></span><svg><path></path></svg></span><em>,</em> <span><span><em>NCT06077656</em></span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146039489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum to “A systematic review of the impact of vaccine reactogenicity on willingness to accept influenza vaccination in adults” [Vaccine 74 (2026) 128195] “疫苗反应原性对成人接受流感疫苗接种意愿影响的系统综述”[疫苗74(2026)128195]。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128252
Helen Lister , Katherine Farquharson , Holly Seale , Louise E. Smith , Tiziano Poletti , Femy Amin , G. James Rubin
{"title":"Erratum to “A systematic review of the impact of vaccine reactogenicity on willingness to accept influenza vaccination in adults” [Vaccine 74 (2026) 128195]","authors":"Helen Lister ,&nbsp;Katherine Farquharson ,&nbsp;Holly Seale ,&nbsp;Louise E. Smith ,&nbsp;Tiziano Poletti ,&nbsp;Femy Amin ,&nbsp;G. James Rubin","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128252","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128252","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128252"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146032268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the delivery costs and operational context of a single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine regimen administered to a multi-age cohort of adolescent girls in Ethiopia 评估埃塞俄比亚多年龄段少女单剂量人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗方案的交付成本和操作背景。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128248
Mercy Mvundura , Rose Slavkovsky , Belayneh Dagnew , Alemayehu Hunduma , Melkamu Ayalew , Diriba Bedada

Introduction

The World Health Organization recently endorsed an alternative single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination regimen based on high-quality evidence of its comparable efficacy and duration of protection as multiple doses. Real-world evidence is lacking on the program cost implications and operational context associated with the new regimen. Our study aimed to evaluate the delivery costs and describe the program context of delivering a single-dose HPV vaccine regimen to a multi-age cohort (MAC) of 9–14 year-old girls, using data from Ethiopia's vaccination campaign conducted in late 2024.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional retrospective study combining operations research and micro-costing methods. We collected primary data on program activities at 82 health facilities in four selected regions and at the associated subnational and national administrative levels. Operations data were tabulated as counts and frequencies to characterize the program context. Delivery costs including financial costs (monetary outlays) and economic costs (financial plus opportunity costs) were estimated. Costing was done from the health system perspective and reported in 2024 United States dollars (US$).

Results

Staff from 90% of health facilities in our sample conducted HPV vaccination sessions at schools and 73% conducted outreach, with an average of 910 HPV vaccine doses delivered per facility. While most health facilities and administrative offices conducted additional program activities, their intensity differed by level of the health system. On average, opportunity costs were the larger share of delivery costs (79%) at health facilities, while at administrative levels it was financial costs (at least 52%). Delivery costs aggregated across all levels of the health system were $0.66 for financial costs and $1.67 for economic costs per dose or per adolescent girl receiving the single-dose regimen.

Conclusion

A single-dose HPV vaccination regimen administered to a MAC resulted in low delivery costs and may be a way for HPV vaccination programs to reduce costs and enhance sustainability.
导论:世界卫生组织最近批准了一种替代性的单剂量人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种方案,基于高质量的证据,其疗效和保护持续时间与多剂量相当。关于新方案的项目成本影响和操作环境,缺乏实际证据。我们的研究旨在评估交付成本,并描述向9-14岁女孩的多年龄队列(MAC)提供单剂量HPV疫苗方案的项目背景,使用的数据来自埃塞俄比亚在2024年底进行的疫苗接种运动。方法:采用运筹学与微观成本法相结合的横断面回顾性研究。我们收集了在四个选定地区的82个卫生设施以及相关的次国家和国家行政级别的方案活动的主要数据。操作数据被制表为计数和频率,以表征程序上下文。交付成本包括财务成本(货币支出)和经济成本(财务加上机会成本)。从卫生系统的角度进行成本计算,并以2024年美元(US$)报告。结果:在我们的样本中,90%的卫生机构的工作人员在学校开展了人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种课程,73%的卫生机构开展了外展活动,平均每家机构提供910剂人乳头瘤病毒疫苗。虽然大多数卫生设施和行政办公室开展了额外的规划活动,但其强度因卫生系统级别而异。平均而言,在卫生设施,机会成本在分娩成本中所占比例较大(79%),而在行政层面,则是财务成本(至少52%)。各级卫生系统的总交付成本为每剂或每名接受单剂方案的少女的财务成本为0.66美元,经济成本为1.67美元。结论:对MAC进行单剂量HPV疫苗接种方案可降低交付成本,可能是HPV疫苗接种计划降低成本和增强可持续性的一种方法。
{"title":"Evaluating the delivery costs and operational context of a single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine regimen administered to a multi-age cohort of adolescent girls in Ethiopia","authors":"Mercy Mvundura ,&nbsp;Rose Slavkovsky ,&nbsp;Belayneh Dagnew ,&nbsp;Alemayehu Hunduma ,&nbsp;Melkamu Ayalew ,&nbsp;Diriba Bedada","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128248","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128248","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The World Health Organization recently endorsed an alternative single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination regimen based on high-quality evidence of its comparable efficacy and duration of protection as multiple doses. Real-world evidence is lacking on the program cost implications and operational context associated with the new regimen. Our study aimed to evaluate the delivery costs and describe the program context of delivering a single-dose HPV vaccine regimen to a multi-age cohort (MAC) of 9–14 year-old girls, using data from Ethiopia's vaccination campaign conducted in late 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a cross-sectional retrospective study combining operations research and micro-costing methods. We collected primary data on program activities at 82 health facilities in four selected regions and at the associated subnational and national administrative levels. Operations data were tabulated as counts and frequencies to characterize the program context. Delivery costs including financial costs (monetary outlays) and economic costs (financial plus opportunity costs) were estimated. Costing was done from the health system perspective and reported in 2024 United States dollars (US$).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Staff from 90% of health facilities in our sample conducted HPV vaccination sessions at schools and 73% conducted outreach, with an average of 910 HPV vaccine doses delivered per facility. While most health facilities and administrative offices conducted additional program activities, their intensity differed by level of the health system. On average, opportunity costs were the larger share of delivery costs (79%) at health facilities, while at administrative levels it was financial costs (at least 52%). Delivery costs aggregated across all levels of the health system were $0.66 for financial costs and $1.67 for economic costs per dose or per adolescent girl receiving the single-dose regimen.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A single-dose HPV vaccination regimen administered to a MAC resulted in low delivery costs and may be a way for HPV vaccination programs to reduce costs and enhance sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128248"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146032223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Primary evaluation of immune responses in mice after a single mRNA immunization with Echinococcus granulosus Eg95 and Coenurus cerebralis TM16 细粒棘球绦虫Eg95和脑棘球绦虫TM16单mRNA免疫小鼠免疫应答的初步评价
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128232
Chun-Ni Meng , Ting-Ting Li , Wen-Hui Li , Meng Wang , Wei-Gang Chen , Hong-Bin Yan , Li Li , Xiao-Lin Sun , Bao-Quan Fu , Nian-Zhang Zhang
Echinococcus granulosus and Taenia multiceps cause zoonotic cystic diseases. Studies have shown that Eg95 from E. granulosus is highly conserved, exhibits excellent immunogenicity, and serves as a critical candidate antigen. In recent years, the TM16 recombinant protein antigen has been one of the most studied antigens for preventing C. cerebralis and demonstrates optimal experimental immunogenicity. This study developed both recombinant protein and mRNA-LNP vaccines targeting the Eg95 and TM16 antigens. Immunization of BALB/c mice showed that both vaccines significantly increased specific antibody levels (IgG, IgG1, IgG2a) and cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-4) (P < 0.001), inducing a predominant Th1-type immune response. The mRNA-LNP vaccine demonstrated superior efficacy in enhancing IgG2a levels and CD8+ T cell responses compared to the protein vaccine. These results indicate strong immunogenicity and support further evaluation of the Eg95-TM16 mRNA-LNP vaccine in intermediate hosts like sheep and goats.
细粒棘球绦虫和多头带绦虫引起人畜共患囊性疾病。研究表明,颗粒棘球绦虫Eg95具有高度保守性,具有良好的免疫原性,是一种重要的候选抗原。TM16重组蛋白抗原是近年来研究最多的预防脑棘球蚴病的抗原之一,具有较好的实验免疫原性。本研究开发了针对Eg95和TM16抗原的重组蛋白和mRNA-LNP疫苗。BALB/c小鼠免疫结果显示,两种疫苗均显著提高特异性抗体(IgG、IgG1、IgG2a)和细胞因子(IFN-γ、IL-4)水平(P
{"title":"Primary evaluation of immune responses in mice after a single mRNA immunization with Echinococcus granulosus Eg95 and Coenurus cerebralis TM16","authors":"Chun-Ni Meng ,&nbsp;Ting-Ting Li ,&nbsp;Wen-Hui Li ,&nbsp;Meng Wang ,&nbsp;Wei-Gang Chen ,&nbsp;Hong-Bin Yan ,&nbsp;Li Li ,&nbsp;Xiao-Lin Sun ,&nbsp;Bao-Quan Fu ,&nbsp;Nian-Zhang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128232","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128232","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Echinococcus granulosus</em> and <em>Taenia multiceps</em> cause zoonotic cystic diseases. Studies have shown that Eg95 from <em>E. granulosus</em> is highly conserved, exhibits excellent immunogenicity, and serves as a critical candidate antigen. In recent years, the TM16 recombinant protein antigen has been one of the most studied antigens for preventing <em>C. cerebralis</em> and demonstrates optimal experimental immunogenicity. This study developed both recombinant protein and mRNA-LNP vaccines targeting the Eg95 and TM16 antigens. Immunization of BALB/c mice showed that both vaccines significantly increased specific antibody levels (IgG, IgG1, IgG2a) and cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-4) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), inducing a predominant Th1-type immune response. The mRNA-LNP vaccine demonstrated superior efficacy in enhancing IgG2a levels and CD8+ T cell responses compared to the protein vaccine. These results indicate strong immunogenicity and support further evaluation of the Eg95-TM16 mRNA-LNP vaccine in intermediate hosts like sheep and goats.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128232"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146032270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vaccination against chikungunya - a systematic review on the immunogenicity, tolerability, and safety of the live-attenuated vaccine (LAV) Ixchiq and the virus like particle (VLP) vaccine Vimkunya 基孔肯雅疫苗接种——对Ixchiq减毒活疫苗和Vimkunya病毒样颗粒疫苗免疫原性、耐受性和安全性的系统评价
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128251
Kerstin Kling , Annika Falman , Lisa Branke , Michael Ramharter , Camilla Rothe , Christian Schönfeld , Thomas Grünewald

Background

Infections with the chikungunya virus are increasingly reported due to many reasons including climate change. Two vaccines against chikungunya have recently been approved in Europe, the live-attenuated vaccine (LAV) Ixchiq and the virus like particle (VLP) vaccine Vimkunya. However, no systematic review of phase 3 clinical trial data has been published that summarizes the currently available evidence on the immunogenicity, tolerability, and safety of these vaccines. Therefore, these data were systematically analyzed by a working group of the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) and the German Society for Tropical Medicine, Travel Medicine and Global Health (DTG).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the immunogenicity, tolerability and safety of Ixchiq and Vimkunya using Embase and PubMed (OVID) according to predefined PICO criteria, including placebo-controlled randomized control trials, cohort, and case-control studies. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the RoB 2-tool. Additionally, post-marketing safety data were studied.

Results

Clinical efficacy data were not available. Instead, seropositivity rates above a predefined threshold served as a surrogate of protection. Both vaccines demonstrated strong immunogenicity with seroprotection rates for Ixchiq of >98% after 4 weeks, and for Vimkunya after 3 weeks of >97% in 12–59-year-olds and > 87% in ≥65-year-olds. In the pivotal studies, both vaccines showed also an acceptable safety profile. Post-marketing safety data showed a higher risk for serious adverse events in elderly patients for Ixchiq.

Conclusion

In addition to mosquito protection and vector control, two vaccines with a good efficacy profile based on the surrogate marker of seroprotection are now available to prevent chikungunya. While both vaccines showed acceptable tolerability, the safety of vaccines must be continuously assessed based on further data from post-marketing surveillance of the respective populations.
背景:由于包括气候变化在内的许多原因,基孔肯雅病毒感染的报道越来越多。欧洲最近批准了两种基孔肯雅疫苗,即Ixchiq减毒活疫苗(LAV)和Vimkunya病毒样颗粒疫苗(VLP)。然而,尚未发表对三期临床试验数据的系统综述,总结这些疫苗的免疫原性、耐受性和安全性的现有证据。因此,德国疫苗接种常设委员会(STIKO)和德国热带医学、旅行医学和全球卫生学会(DTG)的一个工作组对这些数据进行了系统分析。方法:采用Embase和PubMed (OVID)系统评价Ixchiq和Vimkunya的免疫原性、耐受性和安全性,根据预先确定的PICO标准,包括安慰剂对照随机对照试验、队列研究和病例对照研究。用RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。此外,还研究了上市后的安全性数据。结果:无临床疗效资料。相反,血清阳性率高于预定义的阈值作为保护的替代。两种疫苗均表现出很强的免疫原性,4周后Ixchiq的血清保护率为bb0 98%, 3周后Vimkunya的血清保护率为>97%,在12-59岁的人群中为> 87%,≥65岁的人群中为> 87%。在关键研究中,这两种疫苗也显示出可接受的安全性。上市后安全性数据显示,Ixchiq在老年患者中发生严重不良事件的风险较高。结论:除了防蚊和病媒控制外,目前有两种基于血清保护替代标记物的疫苗可用于基孔肯雅热的预防。虽然这两种疫苗都显示出可接受的耐受性,但必须根据对各自人群上市后监测的进一步数据,不断评估疫苗的安全性。
{"title":"Vaccination against chikungunya - a systematic review on the immunogenicity, tolerability, and safety of the live-attenuated vaccine (LAV) Ixchiq and the virus like particle (VLP) vaccine Vimkunya","authors":"Kerstin Kling ,&nbsp;Annika Falman ,&nbsp;Lisa Branke ,&nbsp;Michael Ramharter ,&nbsp;Camilla Rothe ,&nbsp;Christian Schönfeld ,&nbsp;Thomas Grünewald","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128251","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128251","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Infections with the chikungunya virus are increasingly reported due to many reasons including climate change. Two vaccines against chikungunya have recently been approved in Europe, the live-attenuated vaccine (LAV) Ixchiq and the virus like particle (VLP) vaccine Vimkunya. However, no systematic review of phase 3 clinical trial data has been published that summarizes the currently available evidence on the immunogenicity, tolerability, and safety of these vaccines. Therefore, these data were systematically analyzed by a working group of the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) and the German Society for Tropical Medicine, Travel Medicine and Global Health (DTG).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review of the immunogenicity, tolerability and safety of Ixchiq and Vimkunya using Embase and PubMed (OVID) according to predefined PICO criteria, including placebo-controlled randomized control trials, cohort, and case-control studies. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the RoB 2-tool. Additionally, post-marketing safety data were studied.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Clinical efficacy data were not available. Instead, seropositivity rates above a predefined threshold served as a surrogate of protection. Both vaccines demonstrated strong immunogenicity with seroprotection rates for Ixchiq of &gt;98% after 4 weeks, and for Vimkunya after 3 weeks of &gt;97% in 12–59-year-olds and &gt; 87% in ≥65-year-olds. In the pivotal studies, both vaccines showed also an acceptable safety profile. Post-marketing safety data showed a higher risk for serious adverse events in elderly patients for Ixchiq.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In addition to mosquito protection and vector control, two vaccines with a good efficacy profile based on the surrogate marker of seroprotection are now available to prevent chikungunya. While both vaccines showed acceptable tolerability, the safety of vaccines must be continuously assessed based on further data from post-marketing surveillance of the respective populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strategies, interventions, and uptake of catch-up vaccination among adolescent and adult migrants, refugees, and internally displaced persons (IDPs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A systematic review 中低收入国家青少年和成年移民、难民和国内流离失所者(IDPs)的战略、干预措施和补种疫苗接种情况:一项系统综述。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128249
Darlington David Faijue , Oumnia Bouaddi , Kathryn Mackey , Anna Deal , Erva Nur Cinar , Beatriz Morais , Sainabou Bojang , Isra Al-Sharabi , Holly Seale , Agnes Ssali , Kirsty Le Doare , Sally Hargreaves
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Catch-up vaccination helps close immunity gaps among migrants, refugees and internally displaced people (IDPs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite immunisation life-course policies and global guidelines promoting catch-up vaccination of arriving migrants, vaccination strategies for adolescent and adult populations are poorly described. We synthesised evidence on catch-up vaccination strategies and interventions, delivery platforms, uptake and coverage, and contextual barriers and enablers in LMICs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science and grey literature sources (including websites of international and national public health organisations and agencies) for primary studies and reports on catch-up vaccination strategies and interventions, delivery platforms, uptake and coverage, and contextual barriers and enablers targeting adolescents (9–18 years) and, or adults (≥19 years) in migrants (foreign-born, including refugees) and internally displaced people (IDPs; displaced within national borders) across 136 LMICs, (from January 1st 2000 to February 1st 2025; all languages). Study quality was accessed using ROBINS-I, CASP, AACODS and, AGREE II tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-seven records met the inclusion criteria (13 peer-reviewed, 24 grey literature), reporting catch-up vaccination activities across 16 LMICs. Most studies were conducted in Uganda (<em>n</em> = 6), Bangladesh (<em>n</em> = 4), Lebanon (<em>n</em> = 3), and Kenya (<em>n</em> = 3). Interventions reached ≥48,000 migrants, refugees, and IDPs (primarily Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh during COVID-19 catch-up campaigns). Populations targeted included mostly refugees (<em>n</em> = 16 studies; 43.2%), general migrants (<em>n</em> = 14; 37.8%), and IDPs (<em>n</em> = 5; 13.5%), with a smaller number involving mixed or other migrant groups (n = 4; 10.8%). The most frequently delivered vaccines were measles-rubella (<em>n</em> = 12; 32.4%), COVID-19 primary-series catch-up (<em>n</em> = 9; 24.3%), HPV (<em>n</em> = 6; 16.2%), polio OPV/IPV (<em>n</em> = 5; 13.5%), and Hepatitis B (n = 3; 8.1%). Catch-up vaccine delivery most commonly occurred through primary care via opportunistic offers (<em>n</em> = 11) and mobile/outreach delivery (n = 11), with additional implementation in fixed posts in camps/settlements (<em>n</em> = 7), supplemental immunisation activities (SIAs) (n = 6), school-linked delivery (n = 5), and hospital/outpatient opportunistic vaccination (<em>n</em> = 4). High uptake (≥85%) was reported where access barriers were minimised (e.g., walk-in availability, extended hours) was paired with community or peer engagement and simple recall systems (SMS or e-booking). Reported barriers included documentation/entitlement checks, language barriers, and fragmented or non-interoperable vaccination records.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Migrants
背景:补种疫苗有助于缩小低收入和中等收入国家移民、难民和国内流离失所者之间的免疫差距。尽管免疫接种生命周期政策和全球指导方针促进了对抵达移民的补种疫苗接种,但对青少年和成人人群的疫苗接种战略描述甚少。我们综合了关于中等收入国家补种疫苗战略和干预措施、提供平台、吸收和覆盖以及背景障碍和推动因素的证据。方法:我们检索了Embase、Medline、PsycINFO、Global Health、Web of Science和灰色文献来源(包括国际和国家公共卫生组织和机构的网站),以获取针对青少年(9-18岁)和或移民(外国出生的,136个中低收入国家(从2000年1月1日至2025年2月1日,所有语言)的境内流离失所者(包括难民)和境内流离失所者(国内流离失所者)。使用ROBINS-I、CASP、AACODS和AGREE II工具评估研究质量。结果:37份记录符合纳入标准(13份同行评议,24份灰色文献),报告了16个低收入国家的补种接种活动。大多数研究在乌干达(n = 6)、孟加拉国(n = 4)、黎巴嫩(n = 3)和肯尼亚(n = 3)进行。干预措施覆盖了至少4.8万名移民、难民和国内流离失所者(主要是孟加拉国境内的罗兴亚难民)。目标人群主要包括难民(n = 16项研究,43.2%)、一般移民(n = 14项研究,37.8%)和国内流离失所者(n = 5项研究,13.5%),少数涉及混合或其他移民群体(n = 4项研究,10.8%)。提供最多的疫苗是麻疹-风疹疫苗(n = 12, 32.4%)、COVID-19初级系列补种疫苗(n = 9, 24.3%)、HPV疫苗(n = 6, 16.2%)、脊髓灰质炎OPV/IPV疫苗(n = 5, 13.5%)和乙型肝炎疫苗(n = 3, 8.1%)。补充疫苗的提供最常见的方式是初级保健,通过机会提供(n = 11)和流动/外联提供(n = 11),在营地/定居点的固定岗位额外实施(n = 7),补充免疫活动(n = 6),与学校相关的提供(n = 5),以及医院/门诊机会性疫苗接种(n = 4)。据报道,在访问障碍最小化(例如,上门服务、延长工作时间)、社区或同伴参与和简单的召回系统(短信或电子预订)相结合的情况下,使用率很高(≥85%)。报告的障碍包括文件/权利检查、语言障碍和碎片化或不可互操作的疫苗接种记录。结论:移民仍然面临免疫不足的风险,必须更加重视在整个生命过程中促进疫苗接种,以弥补错过的疫苗、剂量和增强剂。迫切需要加强青少年和成人的补种疫苗接种,并改进按移徙分列的数据和提供系统。
{"title":"Strategies, interventions, and uptake of catch-up vaccination among adolescent and adult migrants, refugees, and internally displaced persons (IDPs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A systematic review","authors":"Darlington David Faijue ,&nbsp;Oumnia Bouaddi ,&nbsp;Kathryn Mackey ,&nbsp;Anna Deal ,&nbsp;Erva Nur Cinar ,&nbsp;Beatriz Morais ,&nbsp;Sainabou Bojang ,&nbsp;Isra Al-Sharabi ,&nbsp;Holly Seale ,&nbsp;Agnes Ssali ,&nbsp;Kirsty Le Doare ,&nbsp;Sally Hargreaves","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128249","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128249","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Catch-up vaccination helps close immunity gaps among migrants, refugees and internally displaced people (IDPs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite immunisation life-course policies and global guidelines promoting catch-up vaccination of arriving migrants, vaccination strategies for adolescent and adult populations are poorly described. We synthesised evidence on catch-up vaccination strategies and interventions, delivery platforms, uptake and coverage, and contextual barriers and enablers in LMICs.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We searched Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science and grey literature sources (including websites of international and national public health organisations and agencies) for primary studies and reports on catch-up vaccination strategies and interventions, delivery platforms, uptake and coverage, and contextual barriers and enablers targeting adolescents (9–18 years) and, or adults (≥19 years) in migrants (foreign-born, including refugees) and internally displaced people (IDPs; displaced within national borders) across 136 LMICs, (from January 1st 2000 to February 1st 2025; all languages). Study quality was accessed using ROBINS-I, CASP, AACODS and, AGREE II tools.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Thirty-seven records met the inclusion criteria (13 peer-reviewed, 24 grey literature), reporting catch-up vaccination activities across 16 LMICs. Most studies were conducted in Uganda (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 6), Bangladesh (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 4), Lebanon (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 3), and Kenya (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 3). Interventions reached ≥48,000 migrants, refugees, and IDPs (primarily Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh during COVID-19 catch-up campaigns). Populations targeted included mostly refugees (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 16 studies; 43.2%), general migrants (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 14; 37.8%), and IDPs (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 5; 13.5%), with a smaller number involving mixed or other migrant groups (n = 4; 10.8%). The most frequently delivered vaccines were measles-rubella (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 12; 32.4%), COVID-19 primary-series catch-up (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 9; 24.3%), HPV (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 6; 16.2%), polio OPV/IPV (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 5; 13.5%), and Hepatitis B (n = 3; 8.1%). Catch-up vaccine delivery most commonly occurred through primary care via opportunistic offers (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 11) and mobile/outreach delivery (n = 11), with additional implementation in fixed posts in camps/settlements (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 7), supplemental immunisation activities (SIAs) (n = 6), school-linked delivery (n = 5), and hospital/outpatient opportunistic vaccination (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 4). High uptake (≥85%) was reported where access barriers were minimised (e.g., walk-in availability, extended hours) was paired with community or peer engagement and simple recall systems (SMS or e-booking). Reported barriers included documentation/entitlement checks, language barriers, and fragmented or non-interoperable vaccination records.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Migrants","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 128249"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine use among children in the United States 在美国儿童中使用20价肺炎球菌结合疫苗的公共卫生影响和成本效益
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128212
Diepreye Ayabina , Charles Stoecker , Bo-Hyun Cho , Namrata Prasad , Laura M. King , Andrew J. Leidner , Miwako Kobayashi

Background

In June 2023, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) as an option for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) administration for children in the United States (U.S.). To inform the deliberations of ACIP, we estimated the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of recommending PCV20 for U.S. children.

Methods

Using a probabilistic model, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of replacing PCVs in use at the time of the analysis (13-valent PCV [PCV13] or 15-valent PCV [PCV15]), with PCV20 in a single birth cohort of 3.9 million children. Based on differences in pneumococcal vaccine recommendations, we stratified the population into three mutually exclusive risk groups: children with chronic medical conditions (CMC), children with immunocompromising conditions (IC), and children with neither CMC nor IC (general). We also compared the use of PCV20 alone to the use of PCV20 plus the 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) in CMC and IC children. We computed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of PCV20 use as a net cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

Results

Our base case results showed that use of PCV20 instead of PCV15 across all risk groups in one birth cohort was estimated to avert 151,460 pneumococcal disease events and 13 associated deaths. While this resulted in higher costs of $234 million dollars in the general risk group, leading to a cost per QALY of $153,715, it reduced the total costs by $1 million and $0.48 million in the CMC and IC risk groups. Compared with PCV20 alone, PCV20 plus PPSV23 cost $690,388 (IC) to $4,086,881(CMC) per QALY gained.

Conclusion

Use of PCV20 in the U.S. routine infant immunization program is expected to reduce the clinical burden of pneumococcal disease across all risk groups and specifically yield overall cost savings in the CMC and IC risk groups.
背景:2023年6月,免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)推荐20价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV20)作为美国儿童肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV)的一种选择。为了向ACIP的审议提供信息,我们估计了向美国儿童推荐PCV20的公共卫生影响和成本效益。方法:使用概率模型,我们估计了在分析时用PCV20替代使用的PCV(13价PCV [PCV13]或15价PCV [PCV15])的成本效益,在一个390万儿童的单出生队列中。基于肺炎球菌疫苗推荐的差异,我们将人群分为三个相互排斥的风险组:慢性疾病儿童(CMC)、免疫功能低下儿童(IC)和既没有慢性疾病也没有慢性疾病的儿童(一般)。我们还比较了在CMC和IC儿童中单独使用PCV20与使用PCV20加23价多糖疫苗(PPSV23)的情况。我们计算了使用PCV20的增量成本-效果比,作为获得的每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的净成本。结果:我们的基本病例结果显示,在一个出生队列的所有风险组中使用PCV20代替PCV15,估计可避免151,460例肺炎球菌疾病事件和13例相关死亡。虽然这导致一般风险组的成本增加了2.34亿美元,导致每个QALY的成本为153,715美元,但它使CMC和IC风险组的总成本分别减少了100万美元和48万美元。与单独的PCV20相比,PCV20加PPSV23每获得一个QALY的成本为690,388美元(IC)至4,086,881美元(CMC)。结论:在美国常规婴儿免疫计划中使用PCV20有望减少所有风险组肺炎球菌疾病的临床负担,特别是在CMC和IC风险组中节省总体成本。
{"title":"Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine use among children in the United States","authors":"Diepreye Ayabina ,&nbsp;Charles Stoecker ,&nbsp;Bo-Hyun Cho ,&nbsp;Namrata Prasad ,&nbsp;Laura M. King ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Leidner ,&nbsp;Miwako Kobayashi","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128212","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128212","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In June 2023, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) as an option for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) administration for children in the United States (U.S.). To inform the deliberations of ACIP, we estimated the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of recommending PCV20 for U.S. children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a probabilistic model, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of replacing PCVs in use at the time of the analysis (13-valent PCV [PCV13] or 15-valent PCV [PCV15]), with PCV20 in a single birth cohort of 3.9 million children. Based on differences in pneumococcal vaccine recommendations, we stratified the population into three mutually exclusive risk groups: children with chronic medical conditions (CMC), children with immunocompromising conditions (IC), and children with neither CMC nor IC (general). We also compared the use of PCV20 alone to the use of PCV20 plus the 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) in CMC and IC children. We computed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of PCV20 use as a net cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our base case results showed that use of PCV20 instead of PCV15 across all risk groups in one birth cohort was estimated to avert 151,460 pneumococcal disease events and 13 associated deaths. While this resulted in higher costs of $234 million dollars in the general risk group, leading to a cost per QALY of $153,715, it reduced the total costs by $1 million and $0.48 million in the CMC and IC risk groups. Compared with PCV20 alone, PCV20 plus PPSV23 cost $690,388 (IC) to $4,086,881(CMC) per QALY gained.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Use of PCV20 in the U.S. routine infant immunization program is expected to reduce the clinical burden of pneumococcal disease across all risk groups and specifically yield overall cost savings in the CMC and IC risk groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 128212"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Vaccine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1