Pub Date : 2021-12-30DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v23i3.22371
Maskun Maskun, Azhar Risaldy Rum
The purpose of this research is to identify cyber warfare as a model of War, its position in the perspective of international law, and the steps taken by the state in minimizing losses arising from cyber warfare. This research is normative research using conceptual and statute approaches to answer the problems in this research. The analysis used is content analysis. The study results indicate a need for a common understanding of cyber warfare as a new model of war agreed upon by countries in practice. Normative cyber warfare in international law has to be applied universally. The periodic simulations of cyber defense and artificial intelligence are needed in minimizing the losses caused by cyber warfare. The recommendation is to formulate a definition of cyber warfare universally agreed upon and the state's agreement on the meaning of cyber warfare in international law perspectives.
{"title":"Cyber Warfare: National Security In Dealing With Changing Method of War","authors":"Maskun Maskun, Azhar Risaldy Rum","doi":"10.24815/kanun.v23i3.22371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i3.22371","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to identify cyber warfare as a model of War, its position in the perspective of international law, and the steps taken by the state in minimizing losses arising from cyber warfare. This research is normative research using conceptual and statute approaches to answer the problems in this research. The analysis used is content analysis. The study results indicate a need for a common understanding of cyber warfare as a new model of war agreed upon by countries in practice. Normative cyber warfare in international law has to be applied universally. The periodic simulations of cyber defense and artificial intelligence are needed in minimizing the losses caused by cyber warfare. The recommendation is to formulate a definition of cyber warfare universally agreed upon and the state's agreement on the meaning of cyber warfare in international law perspectives.","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"63 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72457187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-30DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v23i3.21787
E. R. Gultom, Endang Pandamdari
The problem that will be discussed in this article is about the inheritance rights of a widower according to the customary inheritance of the Batak Toba, whether the widower according to the customary inheritance law of the Batak Toba gets an inheritance from his wife's family. The type of normative legal research used in this article is supported by references or secondary data as the basic material for research related to the issues discussed, that is the rights of the inheritance of widowers in Batak Toba. The data sources used are primary data and secondary data. The data from the results of this study will be analyzed with a qualitative approach, then will be described descriptively. The conclusion obtained from this study is that a Toba Batak widower, in the customary inheritance law of the Batak Toba does not inherit from his wife's family because the wife is a family member of the husband (honest marriage), because the wife herself does not also get an inheritance fromhis parents, because in Batak Toba community, only sons (his wife's brother) get a share of the inheritance and become the heirs of the wife's parents.
{"title":"Does Batak Toba Widower Get the Wife’s Family’s Inheritance?","authors":"E. R. Gultom, Endang Pandamdari","doi":"10.24815/kanun.v23i3.21787","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i3.21787","url":null,"abstract":"The problem that will be discussed in this article is about the inheritance rights of a widower according to the customary inheritance of the Batak Toba, whether the widower according to the customary inheritance law of the Batak Toba gets an inheritance from his wife's family. The type of normative legal research used in this article is supported by references or secondary data as the basic material for research related to the issues discussed, that is the rights of the inheritance of widowers in Batak Toba. The data sources used are primary data and secondary data. The data from the results of this study will be analyzed with a qualitative approach, then will be described descriptively. The conclusion obtained from this study is that a Toba Batak widower, in the customary inheritance law of the Batak Toba does not inherit from his wife's family because the wife is a family member of the husband (honest marriage), because the wife herself does not also get an inheritance fromhis parents, because in Batak Toba community, only sons (his wife's brother) get a share of the inheritance and become the heirs of the wife's parents.","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89608238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-30DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v23i3.23241
Ifrani Ifrani, Noor Reza Ihsan
The purpose of this study was to find out the application of the reasons for the elimination of criminals in cases of corruption. The results of this study are case number: 87/Pid.Sus/2010/PN.Mrb, which was strengthened in the Supreme Court's Cassation decision number: 321 K/Pid.Sus/2011, was wrong in applying the excuse of forgiveness as the reason for eliminating the crime in its legal considerations, where the element of forgiving reason applied by the Panel of Judges was not fulfilled, but the justifying reason should be applied because one of the elements of Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the eradication of criminal acts of corruption was not fulfilled because it relied on legal facts and expert testimony without mentioning in detail and with certainty who was benefited from the act, so the implication in this case is that the defendant should be acquitted (vrisjpraak).
本研究的目的是找出在贪污案件中消灭罪犯的理由的应用。本研究结果为病例号:87/Pid.Sus/2010/PN。mr . b .，这在最高法院的撤销判决中得到了加强:321 K/Pid。Sus/2011在其法律考虑中将宽恕的理由作为消除该罪行的理由是错误的，因为法官小组所适用的宽恕理由的要素没有得到满足。但应该适用正当理由，因为经2001年第20号法律修订的关于根除腐败犯罪行为的1999年第31号法律第3条的一个要素没有实现，因为它依赖法律事实和专家证词，而没有详细和确定地提到谁从该行为中受益，因此在这个案件中的含义是被告应该被无罪释放(vrisjpraak)。
{"title":"Application of the Reasons for Elimination of Criminals in Cases of Corruption","authors":"Ifrani Ifrani, Noor Reza Ihsan","doi":"10.24815/kanun.v23i3.23241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i3.23241","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to find out the application of the reasons for the elimination of criminals in cases of corruption. The results of this study are case number: 87/Pid.Sus/2010/PN.Mrb, which was strengthened in the Supreme Court's Cassation decision number: 321 K/Pid.Sus/2011, was wrong in applying the excuse of forgiveness as the reason for eliminating the crime in its legal considerations, where the element of forgiving reason applied by the Panel of Judges was not fulfilled, but the justifying reason should be applied because one of the elements of Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the eradication of criminal acts of corruption was not fulfilled because it relied on legal facts and expert testimony without mentioning in detail and with certainty who was benefited from the act, so the implication in this case is that the defendant should be acquitted (vrisjpraak).","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87520668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The customary legal system of the Mamak Tribe community with a matrilineal kinship system. The division of the inheritance system according to the customary law of the talak mamak tribe adheres to the matrilineal system and the combination between the individual inheritance system and the collective inheritance system. The division of inheritance is done by ninik mamak of the heirs. First, high estate, low estate (livelihood / livelihood) should be separated from the property of the husband and wife, after which the division of this inheritance property can be distributed to the heirs. When a dispute arises, it is first resolved as a family through deliberation. Dispute Resolution on the Rights of the Mamak Tribe Women According to the Dispute over the rights of the Mamak Tribe Women will be brought to a deliberation within the Talang Mamak Tribunal if no agreement is found in the family, then a resolution is requested in the Mamak Tribal Tribal Customs procedure. The parties involved in resolving the dispute over the women's rights of the Talang Mamak Tribe include: the Head of the Tribe, as well as all the customary leaders in the institution.
{"title":"SISTEM KEWARISAN MENURUT HUKUM ADAT MASYARAKAT SUKU TALANG MAMAK","authors":"Erdiansyah Erdiansyah, Hengki Firmanda, Nurahim Rasudin","doi":"10.30652/JIH.V10I2.7978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/JIH.V10I2.7978","url":null,"abstract":"The customary legal system of the Mamak Tribe community with a matrilineal kinship system. The division of the inheritance system according to the customary law of the talak mamak tribe adheres to the matrilineal system and the combination between the individual inheritance system and the collective inheritance system. The division of inheritance is done by ninik mamak of the heirs. First, high estate, low estate (livelihood / livelihood) should be separated from the property of the husband and wife, after which the division of this inheritance property can be distributed to the heirs. When a dispute arises, it is first resolved as a family through deliberation. Dispute Resolution on the Rights of the Mamak Tribe Women According to the Dispute over the rights of the Mamak Tribe Women will be brought to a deliberation within the Talang Mamak Tribunal if no agreement is found in the family, then a resolution is requested in the Mamak Tribal Tribal Customs procedure. The parties involved in resolving the dispute over the women's rights of the Talang Mamak Tribe include: the Head of the Tribe, as well as all the customary leaders in the institution.","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82119892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Law of job creation (UU-CK) already change, remove, and shift the new norm of law of environmental protection (UU-PPLH) in today potentially to create a matter and second legal conflict for this law in the action and law enforcement in the future. Among the urgency of economic affair through the acceleration of investment will face off the urgency of the protection and environmental management. Both matters come as the focus on this article analysis here are these, first the legislation as a system and implication of job creation's law legality against UU-PPLH as environmental clustering in Indonesia. Second, the implication of the change of UU-PPLH due to UU-CK. Here is the conclusion, first the change of UU-PPLH's primary norm due to UU-CK will impact on another norm which the legality directly related on the protection and environmental management overall. Second, the implication identified from the content material, both law potentially to create a norm conflict on the action and law enforcement. Meanwhile, if this case related to the principle of legal conflict settlement, then no principle can be used either the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generalis, the principles of Lex superior derogat legi inferior, and the principles of lex posterior derogat legi priori. To encounter the norm conflict matter, the better one in reformating regulation in the way of Omnibus law method, despite it is limited on the system of clustering and organization, but also not repeal and state the illegality of the impacted regulation.
{"title":"Kedudukan UU Cipta Kerja Terhadap UU-PPLH dan Implikasinya","authors":"H. Helmi","doi":"10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8167","url":null,"abstract":"Law of job creation (UU-CK) already change, remove, and shift the new norm of law of environmental protection (UU-PPLH) in today potentially to create a matter and second legal conflict for this law in the action and law enforcement in the future. Among the urgency of economic affair through the acceleration of investment will face off the urgency of the protection and environmental management. Both matters come as the focus on this article analysis here are these, first the legislation as a system and implication of job creation's law legality against UU-PPLH as environmental clustering in Indonesia. Second, the implication of the change of UU-PPLH due to UU-CK. Here is the conclusion, first the change of UU-PPLH's primary norm due to UU-CK will impact on another norm which the legality directly related on the protection and environmental management overall. Second, the implication identified from the content material, both law potentially to create a norm conflict on the action and law enforcement. Meanwhile, if this case related to the principle of legal conflict settlement, then no principle can be used either the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generalis, the principles of Lex superior derogat legi inferior, and the principles of lex posterior derogat legi priori. To encounter the norm conflict matter, the better one in reformating regulation in the way of Omnibus law method, despite it is limited on the system of clustering and organization, but also not repeal and state the illegality of the impacted regulation.","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80009903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
E. Erlina, Muhammad Ananta Firdaus, Nika Romadilla, Rahmad Ihza Mahendra
Kebakaran hutan dan lahan sering menjadi permasalahan yang sering terjadi berulang setiap tahun di Indonesia, oleh karena itu maka penanganan dan penanggulangan terhadap permasalahan ini harus diupayakan oleh semua pihak baik pemerintah maupun masyarakat. Desa sebagai ujung tombak pemerintahan juga berperan besar dalam usaha-usaha untuk mengatasi permasalahan tersebut. Kebakaran hutan dan lahan yang sering terjadi di Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan dimana sebagaian besar wilayahnya adalah lahan gambut, yang jika tidak dikelola dengan baik akan menambah rumit permasalahan tersebut. Desa Palukahan dan Desa Darussalam salah satu desa di Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara secara sosiologis sangat bergantung pada kondisi lahan gambut yang rentan dan mudah terbakar sementara lahan gambut tersebut merupakan salah satu sarana mata pencaharian masyarakat. Oleh karena itu untuk menjadi adanya perlindungan dan kepastian hukum terhadap masyarakat desa tersebut maka diperlukan upaya-upaya penyusunan Peraturan Desa yang berkaitan dengan Restorasi Lahan Gambut, dimana dalam penyusunan peraturan desa tersebut, selain berorientasi pada kearifan lokal masyarakat desa, diperlukan banyak masukan dan partisipasi aktif dari seluruh elemen masyarakat dalam penyusunannya, agar peraturan desa yang dibentuk dapat berjalan secara optimal
{"title":"IMPLEMENTASI RESTORASI LAHAN GAMBUT MELALUI PENYUSUNAN PERATURAN DESA","authors":"E. Erlina, Muhammad Ananta Firdaus, Nika Romadilla, Rahmad Ihza Mahendra","doi":"10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8120","url":null,"abstract":"Kebakaran hutan dan lahan sering menjadi permasalahan yang sering terjadi berulang setiap tahun di Indonesia, oleh karena itu maka penanganan dan penanggulangan terhadap permasalahan ini harus diupayakan oleh semua pihak baik pemerintah maupun masyarakat. Desa sebagai ujung tombak pemerintahan juga berperan besar dalam usaha-usaha untuk mengatasi permasalahan tersebut. Kebakaran hutan dan lahan yang sering terjadi di Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan dimana sebagaian besar wilayahnya adalah lahan gambut, yang jika tidak dikelola dengan baik akan menambah rumit permasalahan tersebut. Desa Palukahan dan Desa Darussalam salah satu desa di Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara secara sosiologis sangat bergantung pada kondisi lahan gambut yang rentan dan mudah terbakar sementara lahan gambut tersebut merupakan salah satu sarana mata pencaharian masyarakat. Oleh karena itu untuk menjadi adanya perlindungan dan kepastian hukum terhadap masyarakat desa tersebut maka diperlukan upaya-upaya penyusunan Peraturan Desa yang berkaitan dengan Restorasi Lahan Gambut, dimana dalam penyusunan peraturan desa tersebut, selain berorientasi pada kearifan lokal masyarakat desa, diperlukan banyak masukan dan partisipasi aktif dari seluruh elemen masyarakat dalam penyusunannya, agar peraturan desa yang dibentuk dapat berjalan secara optimal","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75695551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Transaksi jual beli online di Indonesia sangat berkembang pesat karena memberi banyak kemudahan. Terutama dalam system pembayaran pengguna dapat membayarkan dengan melalui transfer bank, kredit maupun Cash On Delivery. Namun, dalam pelaksanaannya masih saja mengalami banyak permasalahan yang menyebabkan adanya kerugian bagi para pihak terutama bagi pihak pembeli. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami mengenai peralihan hak milik atas barang serta resiko yang harus dipikul bagi para pihak dan perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen yang menggunakan transaksi jual beli online dengan system Cash On delivery. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normative yaitu bertumpu pada peraturan perundang-undangan dan norma yang berlaku dimasyarakat. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah mengenai peralihan hak milik atas barang melalui transaksi jual beli online dengan system Cash On Delivery adalah melalui penyerahan (levering) namun penyerahannya dilakukan pada saat barang telah sampai kepada pembeli dan dibayarkan oleh pembeli melalui pihak ketiga yaitu kurir pengantar
{"title":"Peralihan Hak Milik Atas Barang Melalui Jual Beli Online dengan Sistem Cash On Delivery","authors":"Ghifara Ayudia Ramadhanty","doi":"10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8060","url":null,"abstract":"Transaksi jual beli online di Indonesia sangat berkembang pesat karena memberi banyak kemudahan. Terutama dalam system pembayaran pengguna dapat membayarkan dengan melalui transfer bank, kredit maupun Cash On Delivery. Namun, dalam pelaksanaannya masih saja mengalami banyak permasalahan yang menyebabkan adanya kerugian bagi para pihak terutama bagi pihak pembeli. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami mengenai peralihan hak milik atas barang serta resiko yang harus dipikul bagi para pihak dan perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen yang menggunakan transaksi jual beli online dengan system Cash On delivery. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normative yaitu bertumpu pada peraturan perundang-undangan dan norma yang berlaku dimasyarakat. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah mengenai peralihan hak milik atas barang melalui transaksi jual beli online dengan system Cash On Delivery adalah melalui penyerahan (levering) namun penyerahannya dilakukan pada saat barang telah sampai kepada pembeli dan dibayarkan oleh pembeli melalui pihak ketiga yaitu kurir pengantar","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88024403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Muhammad al ikhwan Bintarto, Ramy Abubakri Akhirul Zulhaj
Corruption is an immoral act contradict the law which is all of part can’t agree with this doing and can scathe the finances and economy a country, corruption can be carried out in all aspects of society from the lower classes to the upper classes. Corruption in Indonesia in 2020 increased according to ICW even though it was still in the Covid-19 pandemic which presiden was designated thic pandemic as a non-natural disaster, then can point 1 and 2 in Anti-Corruption Laws be implemented during a pandemic The purpose of this study is to explain how the legal policy of enforcing corruption during covid-19 pandemic and how to implement the Anti-Corruption Law point 1 and 2 when pandemic era. This study uses normative research so that it can provide an assessment of a legal action and The data for this research collected from laws and regulations, books, journals, etc. And the results of this study want to know how to enforce corruption in Indonesia when the covid-19 pandemic
{"title":"Politik Hukum Penegakan Tindakan Korupsi Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19","authors":"Muhammad al ikhwan Bintarto, Ramy Abubakri Akhirul Zulhaj","doi":"10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8125","url":null,"abstract":"Corruption is an immoral act contradict the law which is all of part can’t agree with this doing and can scathe the finances and economy a country, corruption can be carried out in all aspects of society from the lower classes to the upper classes. Corruption in Indonesia in 2020 increased according to ICW even though it was still in the Covid-19 pandemic which presiden was designated thic pandemic as a non-natural disaster, then can point 1 and 2 in Anti-Corruption Laws be implemented during a pandemic The purpose of this study is to explain how the legal policy of enforcing corruption during covid-19 pandemic and how to implement the Anti-Corruption Law point 1 and 2 when pandemic era. This study uses normative research so that it can provide an assessment of a legal action and The data for this research collected from laws and regulations, books, journals, etc. And the results of this study want to know how to enforce corruption in Indonesia when the covid-19 pandemic","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80984443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Indonesia sebagai sebuah Negara yang mengakui adanya perbedaan agama dan melindungi kebebasan keberagamaan tersebut secara serius mengatur persoalan pendirian rumah ibadat dalam suatu Peraturan Bersama Menteri. Namun di dalam Peraturan Bersama Menteri ini yang dapat ditafsirkan secara luas dan justru menimbulkan konflik antar umat beragama berupa penolakan pendirian rumah ibadat agama tertentu. Adapun identifikasi masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah penerapan persyaratan pendirian rumah ibadat dan bagaimana efektivitas peran serta masyarakat dalam pendirian rumah ibadat sebagai salah satu persyaratan pendirian rumah ibadat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis sosiologis (socio-legal). Adapun spesifikasi penelitian ini untuk identfikasi masalah bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan, pertama, pihak panitia pendirian rumah ibadat telah berusaha memenuhi seluruh persyaratan yang tercantum dalam PBM Pendirian Rumah Ibadat namun masih ditemukan poenolakan dalam hal pendiriannya. Selain itu pihak pemerintah tidak memfasilitasi pemindahan lokasi pendirian rumah ibadat yang menerima penolakan pendiriannya. Kedua, peran serta masyarakat sebagai salah satu syarat pendirian rumah ibadat justru menghambat efektivitas PBM Pendirian Rumah Ibadat ini dikarenakan struktur social dan psikis masyarakat yang berbeda-beda dan tidak semua masyarakat mau menerima keberadaan rumah ibadat yang berbeda dari agam yang dianutnya.
{"title":"Efektivitas Penerapan Persyaratan Pendirian Rumah Ibadat Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang Berlaku","authors":"Aulia Hestyara","doi":"10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8091","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia sebagai sebuah Negara yang mengakui adanya perbedaan agama dan melindungi kebebasan keberagamaan tersebut secara serius mengatur persoalan pendirian rumah ibadat dalam suatu Peraturan Bersama Menteri. Namun di dalam Peraturan Bersama Menteri ini yang dapat ditafsirkan secara luas dan justru menimbulkan konflik antar umat beragama berupa penolakan pendirian rumah ibadat agama tertentu. Adapun identifikasi masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah penerapan persyaratan pendirian rumah ibadat dan bagaimana efektivitas peran serta masyarakat dalam pendirian rumah ibadat sebagai salah satu persyaratan pendirian rumah ibadat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis sosiologis (socio-legal). Adapun spesifikasi penelitian ini untuk identfikasi masalah bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan, pertama, pihak panitia pendirian rumah ibadat telah berusaha memenuhi seluruh persyaratan yang tercantum dalam PBM Pendirian Rumah Ibadat namun masih ditemukan poenolakan dalam hal pendiriannya. Selain itu pihak pemerintah tidak memfasilitasi pemindahan lokasi pendirian rumah ibadat yang menerima penolakan pendiriannya. Kedua, peran serta masyarakat sebagai salah satu syarat pendirian rumah ibadat justru menghambat efektivitas PBM Pendirian Rumah Ibadat ini dikarenakan struktur social dan psikis masyarakat yang berbeda-beda dan tidak semua masyarakat mau menerima keberadaan rumah ibadat yang berbeda dari agam yang dianutnya.","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80775487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Untuk mencapai jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum hak atas tanah, maka diberikan sertifikat hak atas tanah sebagai bukti kepemilikan seseorang atas suatu tanah beserta bangunannya. Sertipikat merupakan alat bukti yang kuat, namun tidak mutlak, artinya kapan saja dapat digugat oleh pihak lain melalui peradilan, selama dapat dibuktikan sebaliknya data fisik dan data yuridis yang tercantum di dalamnya harus diterima sebagai data yang benar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Wewenang penerbitan dan pembatalan hak atas tanah adalah wewenang Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) sebagai Keputusan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara yang bersifat konkrit, individual dan final, sehingga menimbulkan akibat hukum bagi seseorang atau badan hukum perdata. Dalam proses penerbitan sertipikat hak atas tanah, bisa saja terdapat kesalahan atau cacat administrasi, maka dapat dibatalkan melalui tiga cara yaitu Pembatalan hak atas tanah diterbitkan karena terdapat cacat hukum administrasi dalam penerbitan keputusan pemberian dan/atau sertipikat hak atas tanahnya atau melaksanakan putusan pengadilan yang telah memperoleh kekuatan hukum tetap. Sedangkan objek pembatalan hak atas tanah terdiri dari: a) surat keputusan pemberian hak atas tanah; b) sertifikat hak atas tanah; c) surat keputusan pemberian hak atas tanah dalam rangka pengaturan penguasaan tanah.
{"title":"Penerbitan Dan Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Karena Cacat Administrasi","authors":"Alfons Alfons, Dian Aries Mujiburohman","doi":"10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30652/JIH.V10I2.8095","url":null,"abstract":"Untuk mencapai jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum hak atas tanah, maka diberikan sertifikat hak atas tanah sebagai bukti kepemilikan seseorang atas suatu tanah beserta bangunannya. Sertipikat merupakan alat bukti yang kuat, namun tidak mutlak, artinya kapan saja dapat digugat oleh pihak lain melalui peradilan, selama dapat dibuktikan sebaliknya data fisik dan data yuridis yang tercantum di dalamnya harus diterima sebagai data yang benar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Wewenang penerbitan dan pembatalan hak atas tanah adalah wewenang Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) sebagai Keputusan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara yang bersifat konkrit, individual dan final, sehingga menimbulkan akibat hukum bagi seseorang atau badan hukum perdata. Dalam proses penerbitan sertipikat hak atas tanah, bisa saja terdapat kesalahan atau cacat administrasi, maka dapat dibatalkan melalui tiga cara yaitu Pembatalan hak atas tanah diterbitkan karena terdapat cacat hukum administrasi dalam penerbitan keputusan pemberian dan/atau sertipikat hak atas tanahnya atau melaksanakan putusan pengadilan yang telah memperoleh kekuatan hukum tetap. Sedangkan objek pembatalan hak atas tanah terdiri dari: a) surat keputusan pemberian hak atas tanah; b) sertifikat hak atas tanah; c) surat keputusan pemberian hak atas tanah dalam rangka pengaturan penguasaan tanah.","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81217878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：