Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108803
Floore Bursens , Silvia De Poli , Sofia Maier , Gerlinde Verbist
This paper explores the distributive impact of a hypothetical carbon tax on households' transport and energy consumption in Belgium. It focuses on the welfare effects across population groups and along the income distribution, as well as on the expected budgetary and environmental effects, accounting for consumer responses under a partial equilibrium microsimulation framework. Given the well-known regressive features of consumption taxes in general, and of energy- or carbon-related taxes in particular, this study evaluates various scenarios for making the carbon tax more progressive and assesses how these methods affect the overall distributional outcomes and reduce emissions. Our results show that it is very difficult to offset the regressivity by changing the carbon tax design. The tax design scenario that has the smallest negative inequality effect and reduces GHG emissions the most, is the one that differentiates the tax on the basis of product category, and more specifically by taxing the most elastic product, which is transport. We also discuss the feasibility of the tax design scenarios, indicating that practical implementation and acceptability issues require careful consideration when designing and introducing the tax.
{"title":"Bridging climate and social equity: Progressive carbon tax simulations for Belgium","authors":"Floore Bursens , Silvia De Poli , Sofia Maier , Gerlinde Verbist","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108803","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108803","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the distributive impact of a hypothetical carbon tax on households' transport and energy consumption in Belgium. It focuses on the welfare effects across population groups and along the income distribution, as well as on the expected budgetary and environmental effects, accounting for consumer responses under a partial equilibrium microsimulation framework. Given the well-known regressive features of consumption taxes in general, and of energy- or carbon-related taxes in particular, this study evaluates various scenarios for making the carbon tax more progressive and assesses how these methods affect the overall distributional outcomes and reduce emissions. Our results show that it is very difficult to offset the regressivity by changing the carbon tax design. The tax design scenario that has the smallest negative inequality effect and reduces GHG emissions the most, is the one that differentiates the tax on the basis of product category, and more specifically by taxing the most elastic product, which is transport. We also discuss the feasibility of the tax design scenarios, indicating that practical implementation and acceptability issues require careful consideration when designing and introducing the tax.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108803"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145261753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The uptake of electric vehicles (EVs) poses new challenges to the electricity grid, as charging during peak demand hours leads to grid congestion, higher costs, and greater reliance on non-renewable energy sources. Grid-friendly EV charging strategies that encourage off-peak or renewable-abundant charging are essential for a sustainable transition. This study assesses the effect of nudging interventions – social framing with or without social transparency of own behavior and with donation-based gamification – on EV drivers' willingness to charge during grid-friendly times. The online vignette experiment conducted with 1178 EV drivers in Norway reveals that social framing, whether combined with social transparency of individual contributions or with donation-based gamification, fails to increase the likelihood of grid-friendly charging. In fact, donation-based gamification reduces the willingness to charge in a grid-friendly manner compared to the other two social framing interventions. Moreover, higher flexibility in daily routines, as well as individual characteristics such as being female and holding stronger moral values, are positively associated with grid-friendly charging. These findings provide insights into factors that are related to grid-conscious charging behavior, contributing to power system stability, renewable energy integration, and a successful transition to sustainable electric mobility.
{"title":"Nudging grid-friendly electric vehicle charging: Different shades of social framing and the power of individual factors","authors":"Junianna Zatsarnaja , Katharina Reiter , Alwine Mohnen , Trond Nordfjærn","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108805","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108805","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The uptake of electric vehicles (EVs) poses new challenges to the electricity grid, as charging during peak demand hours leads to grid congestion, higher costs, and greater reliance on non-renewable energy sources. Grid-friendly EV charging strategies that encourage off-peak or renewable-abundant charging are essential for a sustainable transition. This study assesses the effect of nudging interventions – social framing with or without social transparency of own behavior and with donation-based gamification – on EV drivers' willingness to charge during grid-friendly times. The online vignette experiment conducted with 1178 EV drivers in Norway reveals that social framing, whether combined with social transparency of individual contributions or with donation-based gamification, fails to increase the likelihood of grid-friendly charging. In fact, donation-based gamification reduces the willingness to charge in a grid-friendly manner compared to the other two social framing interventions. Moreover, higher flexibility in daily routines, as well as individual characteristics such as being female and holding stronger moral values, are positively associated with grid-friendly charging. These findings provide insights into factors that are related to grid-conscious charging behavior, contributing to power system stability, renewable energy integration, and a successful transition to sustainable electric mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108805"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145094183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-19DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108797
Anja Köbrich Leon , Janosch Schobin
Our study addresses the urgent need for scalable tools to influence high climateimpact behaviors. To this end, we developed an interactive multiplayer game, Carbonia, designed to encourage groups of friends to reduce their consumption of foods with high climate impact, particularly meat. The game targets two main outcomes: dietary choices and knowledge about the climate impact of various foods. We compared this game-based intervention to a digital food diary and a control group keeping a diary on an unrelated topic. Our network intervention study among 702 university students from a major Chilean university allowed us to randomize treatments within real-life friend groups and non-friend groups. Results indicate that both the game and food diary treatments improved participants' knowledge of climate-impactful food choices. Additionally, data collected during the intervention suggest that the game treatment led to more climate-friendly food consumption over time.
{"title":"Boosting peer influence for the climate? – Intervening friendship networks with serious games to promote food knowledge and reduce meat consumption","authors":"Anja Köbrich Leon , Janosch Schobin","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108797","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108797","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our study addresses the urgent need for scalable tools to influence high climateimpact behaviors. To this end, we developed an interactive multiplayer game, Carbonia, designed to encourage groups of friends to reduce their consumption of foods with high climate impact, particularly meat. The game targets two main outcomes: dietary choices and knowledge about the climate impact of various foods. We compared this game-based intervention to a digital food diary and a control group keeping a diary on an unrelated topic. Our network intervention study among 702 university students from a major Chilean university allowed us to randomize treatments within real-life friend groups and non-friend groups. Results indicate that both the game and food diary treatments improved participants' knowledge of climate-impactful food choices. Additionally, data collected during the intervention suggest that the game treatment led to more climate-friendly food consumption over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108797"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145094166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-15DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108831
Line Kryger Aagaard
The accelerating planetary crises call for rapid reductions in carbon emissions, unlikely to be achieved alone through increasing renewable energy and more efficient production. A wide-ranging transformation of affluent lifestyles and current consumption-production relationships is needed as well. This brings existing economic models into question, as profit often stands in the way of necessary reductions. Thus, a growing field of research points to the need of rethinking the economic system, and frameworks of degrowth and sufficiency are receiving more attention.
In the context of Denmark, this paper maps the landscape of both mainstream and alternative consumption-production relationships across three high-emission domains: food, housing and mobility. Based on focus groups with 52 professional stakeholders, I identify a correlation between economic activities and sustainability approaches, with efficiency-oriented models being tied to profit-driven economies and sufficiency-oriented models aligned with alternative, collective economic practices. This finding shows how economic systems shape the strategies organizations employ in addressing environmental challenges.
Furthermore, more-than-capitalist economic activities in this landscape are explored. By zooming in on three cases, community supported agriculture, tiny houses and hitchhiking, I draw attention to diverse economies as a lens to reframe consumption-production relationships in a sufficiency-oriented direction. I contribute to this field by proposing three key dimensions in which more-than-capitalist actors share characteristics across food, housing and mobility: 1) spatial; 2) temporal; and 3) relational. Highlighting these, the paper calls for further research and attention to spatial proximity, long-term engagement and community-building in developing consumption-production relationships for a sustainable future.
{"title":"More-than-capitalist economies: Insights from community supported agriculture, tiny houses and hitchhiking in Denmark","authors":"Line Kryger Aagaard","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108831","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108831","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The accelerating planetary crises call for rapid reductions in carbon emissions, unlikely to be achieved alone through increasing renewable energy and more efficient production. A wide-ranging transformation of affluent lifestyles and current consumption-production relationships is needed as well. This brings existing economic models into question, as profit often stands in the way of necessary reductions. Thus, a growing field of research points to the need of rethinking the economic system, and frameworks of degrowth and sufficiency are receiving more attention.</div><div>In the context of Denmark, this paper maps the landscape of both mainstream and alternative consumption-production relationships across three high-emission domains: food, housing and mobility. Based on focus groups with 52 professional stakeholders, I identify a correlation between economic activities and sustainability approaches, with efficiency-oriented models being tied to profit-driven economies and sufficiency-oriented models aligned with alternative, collective economic practices. This finding shows how economic systems shape the strategies organizations employ in addressing environmental challenges.</div><div>Furthermore, more-than-capitalist economic activities in this landscape are explored. By zooming in on three cases, community supported agriculture, tiny houses and hitchhiking, I draw attention to diverse economies as a lens to reframe consumption-production relationships in a sufficiency-oriented direction. I contribute to this field by proposing three key dimensions in which more-than-capitalist actors share characteristics across food, housing and mobility: 1) spatial; 2) temporal; and 3) relational. Highlighting these, the paper calls for further research and attention to spatial proximity, long-term engagement and community-building in developing consumption-production relationships for a sustainable future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108831"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145314933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-15DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108822
Jörgen Larsson , Edvin Månsson , Elin Röös , Sarah Säll , Emma Patterson , Liselotte Schäfer Elinder , Jonas Nässén , Emma Ejelöv
This study evaluates cost-neutral food tax reforms integrating climate and health objectives, compared with strictly climate- and health-focused reforms. Results indicate that a strict climate-focused reform risks negative health outcomes, while the strict health-focused reform achieves only 40 % of the climate benefit of the integrated reforms and adversely impacts animal welfare.
Integrated tax reforms, however, could reduce Sweden's food carbon footprint by an amount equivalent to an 8 % reduction in passenger car emissions, alongside co-benefits such as decreased pesticide and fertilizer use and lower ammonia emissions. In addition, the healthier diets simulated as a result of the integrated reforms are estimated to save more than twice as many lives as those lost to road traffic fatalities.
Furthermore, the strict climate- and health-focused reforms lead to higher food costs, disproportionately affecting low-income groups. The integrated reforms were designed to be cost-neutral by applying subsidies in the form of VAT exemptions on healthy foods or through the redistribution of tax revenues to all citizens. This study demonstrates that it is possible to design food tax reforms to achieve substantial environmental and health improvements while avoiding additional financial burdens on consumers, suggesting a promising pathway for policy development.
{"title":"Cost-neutral food tax reforms for healthier and more sustainable diets","authors":"Jörgen Larsson , Edvin Månsson , Elin Röös , Sarah Säll , Emma Patterson , Liselotte Schäfer Elinder , Jonas Nässén , Emma Ejelöv","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108822","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108822","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates cost-neutral food tax reforms integrating climate and health objectives, compared with strictly climate- and health-focused reforms. Results indicate that a strict climate-focused reform risks negative health outcomes, while the strict health-focused reform achieves only 40 % of the climate benefit of the integrated reforms and adversely impacts animal welfare.</div><div>Integrated tax reforms, however, could reduce Sweden's food carbon footprint by an amount equivalent to an 8 % reduction in passenger car emissions, alongside co-benefits such as decreased pesticide and fertilizer use and lower ammonia emissions. In addition, the healthier diets simulated as a result of the integrated reforms are estimated to save more than twice as many lives as those lost to road traffic fatalities.</div><div>Furthermore, the strict climate- and health-focused reforms lead to higher food costs, disproportionately affecting low-income groups. The integrated reforms were designed to be cost-neutral by applying subsidies in the form of VAT exemptions on healthy foods or through the redistribution of tax revenues to all citizens. This study demonstrates that it is possible to design food tax reforms to achieve substantial environmental and health improvements while avoiding additional financial burdens on consumers, suggesting a promising pathway for policy development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108822"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145314848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-04DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108845
G. Corsi , R. Guarino , E. Muñoz-Ulecia , U. Grande , E. Buonocore , A. Sapio , P.P. Franzese
This paper uses a mixed methods approach to investigate the development of Ecological Economics (EE), combining a critical literature review with quantitative bibliometric analysis. It maps the intellectual trajectory of the field, its thematic shifts and its authorship networks from inception to the present time. Three phases are identified: (i) 1983–1997: the founding period; (ii) 1998–2011: the establishment of ecosystem services' valuation; and (iii) 2012–2024: the contemporary EE, characterized by internal tensions and increasing integration into mainstream environmental initiatives. Our findings reveal a global surge in interest in the field, accompanied by an expansion in the intellectual scope and research themes, as well as a broader geographic distribution of authors. This is associated with the emergence of numerous new journals, with Ecological Economics maintaining a central, albeit declining, position. Our research shows that while EE began as a critique of neoclassical economics, during its establishment phase it embraced market-based solutions and monetary valuation. However, contemporary trends indicate a critical reassessment of these approaches, with a shift towards exploring issues such as climate justice, degrowth and social metabolism. This dynamic evolution highlights the ongoing importance of EE as a platform for transdisciplinary research that challenges conventional economic thinking.
{"title":"Has “Ecological Economics” betrayed its roots? Revealing its state, internal tensions and evolution through a multi-level and multi-scale bibliometric assessment","authors":"G. Corsi , R. Guarino , E. Muñoz-Ulecia , U. Grande , E. Buonocore , A. Sapio , P.P. Franzese","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108845","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108845","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper uses a mixed methods approach to investigate the development of Ecological Economics (EE), combining a critical literature review with quantitative bibliometric analysis. It maps the intellectual trajectory of the field, its thematic shifts and its authorship networks from inception to the present time. Three phases are identified: (i) 1983–1997: the founding period; (ii) 1998–2011: the establishment of ecosystem services' valuation; and (iii) 2012–2024: the contemporary EE, characterized by internal tensions and increasing integration into mainstream environmental initiatives. Our findings reveal a global surge in interest in the field, accompanied by an expansion in the intellectual scope and research themes, as well as a broader geographic distribution of authors. This is associated with the emergence of numerous new journals, with Ecological Economics maintaining a central, albeit declining, position. Our research shows that while EE began as a critique of neoclassical economics, during its establishment phase it embraced market-based solutions and monetary valuation. However, contemporary trends indicate a critical reassessment of these approaches, with a shift towards exploring issues such as climate justice, degrowth and social metabolism. This dynamic evolution highlights the ongoing importance of EE as a platform for transdisciplinary research that challenges conventional economic thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108845"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145441643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-04DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108836
Pablo de la Vega
We analyze the potential economic impacts in Argentina of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which as of January 2026 will prohibit the export to the European Union of certain raw materials and related products if they involve the use of deforested land. We estimate that the EUDR would cover around 6 billion US dollars in exported value, but only 2.84 % is not compliant with the EUDR, with soy and cattle being the most affected production chains. We use a dynamic computable general equilibrium model to simulate the impact of the EUDR on the Argentine economy. If the non-compliant production cannot enter the EU market because of the EUDR, the results of the simulations suggest that the potential macroeconomic impacts are limited: GDP would be reduced by an average of 0.14 % with respect to the baseline scenario. However, the potential environmental impact is greater. Deforested hectares would be reduced by 2.45 % and GHG emissions by 0.19 %. Notwithstanding, EUDR due diligence costs may still prevent compliant production from entering the EU market, so the total impacts could be higher.
{"title":"The European Union deforestation regulation: The impact on Argentina","authors":"Pablo de la Vega","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108836","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108836","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We analyze the potential economic impacts in Argentina of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which as of January 2026 will prohibit the export to the European Union of certain raw materials and related products if they involve the use of deforested land. We estimate that the EUDR would cover around 6 billion US dollars in exported value, but only 2.84 % is not compliant with the EUDR, with soy and cattle being the most affected production chains. We use a dynamic computable general equilibrium model to simulate the impact of the EUDR on the Argentine economy. If the non-compliant production cannot enter the EU market because of the EUDR, the results of the simulations suggest that the potential macroeconomic impacts are limited: GDP would be reduced by an average of 0.14 % with respect to the baseline scenario. However, the potential environmental impact is greater. Deforested hectares would be reduced by 2.45 % and GHG emissions by 0.19 %. Notwithstanding, EUDR due diligence costs may still prevent compliant production from entering the EU market, so the total impacts could be higher.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108836"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145441839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-08DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108821
Felix Schläpfer
Rents and transfers linked to natural resources are an increasingly important part of national economies. However, concepts to comprehensively measure them remain limited, and empirical estimates are scarce. This paper proposes four concepts to organize and measure ‘total rents from natural resources’ including (1) traditional ‘resource rent’, (2) ‘resource gain’ defined as increases in resource value independent of changes in rights to resources, (3) ‘resource transfer’ through regulatory changes in resource rights, and (4) ‘resource externality’ or transfers through uncompensated damage to resources. Preliminary estimates for Switzerland for the period from 2016 to 2021 were calculated based on official statistics, private land price data, and existing studies of external costs. The annual estimates amount to CHF 78 billion for resource rent, CHF 167 billion for resource gain, CHF 23 billion for resource transfer, and CHF 31 billion for resource externality. The sum of CHF 298 billion corresponded to 42 % of the Swiss GDP in the same period, which was more than the combined tax revenues at the federal, cantonal and municipal levels. The rents from urban land accounted for 89 % of the total. Although these estimates are subject to considerable uncertainty, they show that the rents from natural resoures are very significant. These rents offer important potential for designing more efficient taxes and for achieving more equitable distributional outcomes. They deserve more attention in academic research and official statistics.
{"title":"Total rents from natural resources: Framework and preliminary estimates for Switzerland","authors":"Felix Schläpfer","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108821","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108821","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rents and transfers linked to natural resources are an increasingly important part of national economies. However, concepts to comprehensively measure them remain limited, and empirical estimates are scarce. This paper proposes four concepts to organize and measure ‘total rents from natural resources’ including (1) traditional ‘resource rent’, (2) ‘resource gain’ defined as increases in resource value independent of changes in rights to resources, (3) ‘resource transfer’ through regulatory changes in resource rights, and (4) ‘resource externality’ or transfers through uncompensated damage to resources. Preliminary estimates for Switzerland for the period from 2016 to 2021 were calculated based on official statistics, private land price data, and existing studies of external costs. The annual estimates amount to CHF 78 billion for resource rent, CHF 167 billion for resource gain, CHF 23 billion for resource transfer, and CHF 31 billion for resource externality. The sum of CHF 298 billion corresponded to 42 % of the Swiss GDP in the same period, which was more than the combined tax revenues at the federal, cantonal and municipal levels. The rents from urban land accounted for 89 % of the total. Although these estimates are subject to considerable uncertainty, they show that the rents from natural resoures are very significant. These rents offer important potential for designing more efficient taxes and for achieving more equitable distributional outcomes. They deserve more attention in academic research and official statistics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108821"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145261719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108828
Ángela García-Alaminos, María-Ángeles Cadarso, Luis A. López, María-Ángeles Tobarra
The vulnerability of global value chains is in the spotlight due to recent geopolitical tensions and shocks with a worldwide impact. Vulnerability in trade terms is often linked to distance from the suppliers, high concentration of imports, or not-shared values, implying several logistic risks. As a result, economies seeking higher resilience in their value chains are considering new sourcing strategies, like backshoring or nearshoring. Such trade-restructuring schemes need to consider sustainability to be effectively resilient, but, at the same time, they are drivers of changes in global carbon emissions.
This paper aims to measure the magnitude of those relocation patterns and their impact on carbon emissions, focusing on the European Union (EU). For this purpose, we use an environmentally extended multiregional input-output model to calculate global emissions' trends from 1995 to 2018 and to identify different trade-relocation patterns, quantifying their carbon content. We also perform a structural decomposition analysis to divide the changes in the EU's carbon footprint according to different drivers.
Our results show a change in global emissions evolution from 2008 onwards, with emerging trends of global value chains reconfiguration showing a more vital role of environmental concerns. We also find that reshoring and reoffshoring are less emission-intensive than offshoring. In the EU's context, its footprint has been reduced since the 2008 crisis, mainly due to lower emissions intensities and technical changes towards cleaner ways of production. In contrast, the geographical shift of suppliers contributes to the growth of emissions in the whole period.
{"title":"Recent global value chain reconfiguration: drivers and consequences on EU carbon footprint","authors":"Ángela García-Alaminos, María-Ángeles Cadarso, Luis A. López, María-Ángeles Tobarra","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108828","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108828","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The vulnerability of global value chains is in the spotlight due to recent geopolitical tensions and shocks with a worldwide impact. Vulnerability in trade terms is often linked to distance from the suppliers, high concentration of imports, or not-shared values, implying several logistic risks. As a result, economies seeking higher resilience in their value chains are considering new sourcing strategies, like backshoring or nearshoring. Such trade-restructuring schemes need to consider sustainability to be effectively resilient, but, at the same time, they are drivers of changes in global carbon emissions.</div><div>This paper aims to measure the magnitude of those relocation patterns and their impact on carbon emissions, focusing on the European Union (EU). For this purpose, we use an environmentally extended multiregional input-output model to calculate global emissions' trends from 1995 to 2018 and to identify different trade-relocation patterns, quantifying their carbon content. We also perform a structural decomposition analysis to divide the changes in the EU's carbon footprint according to different drivers.</div><div>Our results show a change in global emissions evolution from 2008 onwards, with emerging trends of global value chains reconfiguration showing a more vital role of environmental concerns. We also find that reshoring and reoffshoring are less emission-intensive than offshoring. In the EU's context, its footprint has been reduced since the 2008 crisis, mainly due to lower emissions intensities and technical changes towards cleaner ways of production. In contrast, the geographical shift of suppliers contributes to the growth of emissions in the whole period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108828"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145314935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108827
Xi Ji , Xianling Long , Xuanyuan Luo , Robert Costanza
Previous wellbeing measures often aggregate economic, social, and environmental dimensions, assuming full substitutability. We propose a new index—Sustainable Wellbeing (SW)—that integrates Wellbeing Magnitude (WM) and Wellbeing Diversity (WD). This index reflects that positive wellbeing sources increase SW, with diminishing marginal returns, while negative wellbeing sources decrease SW, with increasing marginal damage. Both diversity and magnitude are integral to the index. This framework is applicable to many wellbeing indices. We demonstrate the application of SW using the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) for China, creating a revised Sustainable GPI (SGPI) that incorporates WD. An evaluation across China's 31 provinces from 1985 to 2018 shows a decline in WD, leading to a growing gap between sustainable wellbeing and economic growth. Economic wellbeing has expanded at the expense of environmental quality. The SGPI-to-GDP ratio displays an inverted U-shaped curve, reflecting limited substitutability between economic and environmental wellbeing beyond a certain income threshold. Provinces with stronger service sectors experienced the highest per capita SGPI growth. The wellbeing diversity framework supports balanced development and aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
{"title":"A new index reveals a widening gap between growth and sustainable wellbeing in China","authors":"Xi Ji , Xianling Long , Xuanyuan Luo , Robert Costanza","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108827","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108827","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous wellbeing measures often aggregate economic, social, and environmental dimensions, assuming full substitutability. We propose a new index—Sustainable Wellbeing (SW)—that integrates Wellbeing Magnitude (WM) and Wellbeing Diversity (WD). This index reflects that positive wellbeing sources increase SW, with diminishing marginal returns, while negative wellbeing sources decrease SW, with increasing marginal damage. Both diversity and magnitude are integral to the index. This framework is applicable to many wellbeing indices. We demonstrate the application of SW using the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) for China, creating a revised Sustainable GPI (SGPI) that incorporates WD. An evaluation across China's 31 provinces from 1985 to 2018 shows a decline in WD, leading to a growing gap between sustainable wellbeing and economic growth. Economic wellbeing has expanded at the expense of environmental quality. The SGPI-to-GDP ratio displays an inverted U-shaped curve, reflecting limited substitutability between economic and environmental wellbeing beyond a certain income threshold. Provinces with stronger service sectors experienced the highest per capita SGPI growth. The wellbeing diversity framework supports balanced development and aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 108827"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145363021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}