Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.10
Y. Butenko, R. Kharytonenko, S. Petrychenko
A review and analysis of government methodological recommendations, studies of scientific institutions, groups of scientists and public organizations related to studies of the assessment and impact of hostilities on the ground was carried out. The key positions in methodological recommendations related to the assessment of negative consequences on land due to man-made pollution and damage are selected and indicated. The key positions in the methodological recommendations related to the assessment of negative consequences on the ground as a result of hostilities were analyzed and indicated. The study of scientific institutions, groups of scientists and public organizations related to studies of the assessment and impact of hostilities on lands and soils is considered. It is indicated that the practical studies to date, which are related to the assessment of the impact of hostilities on the productivity of land use, in particular, in terms of the territories of territorial communities, are spot-on. It is noted that the government's methodological recommendations, dedicated to land in general or in the context of agricultural land, forest fund and do not take into account other categories of land. The need to continue scientific research and the development of methodological recommendations regarding the assessment and restoration of land as a result of hostilities was emphasized, and relevant directions were proposed.
{"title":"Analysis of scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity from scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity","authors":"Y. Butenko, R. Kharytonenko, S. Petrychenko","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.10","url":null,"abstract":"A review and analysis of government methodological recommendations, studies of scientific institutions, groups of scientists and public organizations related to studies of the assessment and impact of hostilities on the ground was carried out. The key positions in methodological recommendations related to the assessment of negative consequences on land due to man-made pollution and damage are selected and indicated. The key positions in the methodological recommendations related to the assessment of negative consequences on the ground as a result of hostilities were analyzed and indicated. The study of scientific institutions, groups of scientists and public organizations related to studies of the assessment and impact of hostilities on lands and soils is considered. It is indicated that the practical studies to date, which are related to the assessment of the impact of hostilities on the productivity of land use, in particular, in terms of the territories of territorial communities, are spot-on. It is noted that the government's methodological recommendations, dedicated to land in general or in the context of agricultural land, forest fund and do not take into account other categories of land. The need to continue scientific research and the development of methodological recommendations regarding the assessment and restoration of land as a result of hostilities was emphasized, and relevant directions were proposed.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70003397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.03
M. Shershun, T. Mykytyn
According to the data of the State Cadastre, at the beginning of 2021, the nature reserve fund counted 8,633 territories and objects with a total area of 4.1 million hectares, which was 6.8% of the country's area. These territories are under the authority of various departments. The main purpose of protected areas is to preserve unique landscapes, species of flora and fauna for future generations. Today, the task is to increase the area of the nature reserve fund. It has been established that national natural parks (NPPs) are one of the largest objects of the protected fund in terms of area. To date, 56 NPPs have been created, which occupy an area of 1,399,161 hectares, which is 30.6% of the entire nature reserve fund. Administrations have been created in national parks to implement the functions entrusted to the park. These include preservation and protection of unique landscapes, conducting scientific research, recreational activities and educational work. The territory of the park includes lands of different purposes. These are mainly forests and other wooded areas (60%), the sea - 21%, inland waters - 6%, agricultural land - 5%, For the effective management of the national natural park, projects are being developed for the organization of the territory of the NPP for the protection, reproduction and recreational use of its natural complexes and objects. At the same time, a project approach is used, which makes it possible to achieve the strategic goals of the park with the help of the proposed measures. It is proposed to grow energy willow on agricultural lands. The environmental component of the project is important, as we have zero carbon emissions when using willow as fuel, which is important at the current price of energy resources. A technological map of growing has been developed, the efficiency of growing energy willow in the territories of the Nobel NPP has been calculated.
{"title":"Features of the management of the territories of National nature parks","authors":"M. Shershun, T. Mykytyn","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.03","url":null,"abstract":"According to the data of the State Cadastre, at the beginning of 2021, the nature reserve fund counted 8,633 territories and objects with a total area of 4.1 million hectares, which was 6.8% of the country's area. These territories are under the authority of various departments. The main purpose of protected areas is to preserve unique landscapes, species of flora and fauna for future generations. Today, the task is to increase the area of the nature reserve fund. It has been established that national natural parks (NPPs) are one of the largest objects of the protected fund in terms of area. To date, 56 NPPs have been created, which occupy an area of 1,399,161 hectares, which is 30.6% of the entire nature reserve fund. Administrations have been created in national parks to implement the functions entrusted to the park. These include preservation and protection of unique landscapes, conducting scientific research, recreational activities and educational work. The territory of the park includes lands of different purposes. These are mainly forests and other wooded areas (60%), the sea - 21%, inland waters - 6%, agricultural land - 5%, For the effective management of the national natural park, projects are being developed for the organization of the territory of the NPP for the protection, reproduction and recreational use of its natural complexes and objects. At the same time, a project approach is used, which makes it possible to achieve the strategic goals of the park with the help of the proposed measures. It is proposed to grow energy willow on agricultural lands. The environmental component of the project is important, as we have zero carbon emissions when using willow as fuel, which is important at the current price of energy resources. A technological map of growing has been developed, the efficiency of growing energy willow in the territories of the Nobel NPP has been calculated.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70003675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2023.03.010
V. Shabaniuk, О. Dyshlyk
GeoInformation (GI) Systems (GIS) and GI Technologies (GIT, together GIST) have been used for almost half a century, since the creation of Canada's first GIS in the 60s of the last century, to solve territory management problems. Over the past years, GISTs have reached their maturity, but still continue to develop, covering ever wider areas of use. Even the science of geoinformatics has emerged, in which GIST is used mainly as a toolkit or technology. As an example, geoinformatics in the same Canada is called geomatics and is a technology and/or technological science. At the same time, the expansion of the field of GIST use poses to researchers the question of methods and methodology. They are followed by issues of methods and methodology of geoinformatics not only as a technology, but also as a science. Moreover, these issues become more complicated with the expansion of the field of use. In the information industry, together with the field of use, the term "domain" or "context" is used. Thus, modern GIST usage manipulate a large number of interrelated terms and concepts that are often not clearly defined. The work is devoted to the classification of the main ones, which are influenced by the strategy selected. Spatial models of territory are used in the work. They are used in the study of both territorial systems of reality and individual spatial entities and phenomena of reality. Among spatial models, the main attention is paid to information spatial models, the most famous of which are GeoInformation Systems (GIS). GIS are inseparable from GIS tools - GeoInformation Technologies (GIT). The main results of the article were obtained using the so-called method of Conceptual Frameworks (CoFr) of Spatial Information Systems (SpIS). The CoFr method is applied to a special class of GIS - Atlas Geo-Information Systems (AGIS) of large territories (LT). The AGIS class includes Electronic Atlases (EA), Atlas Information Systems (AtIS), Cartographic Information Systems (CIS) and, in fact, GIS, if we are talking about LT. AGIS-LT is a hierarchical echeloned SpIS, for which the main terms and concepts of the article are applicable. These are such terms and concepts as "strategy" and "methodology" of GIS usage. GIS, in turn, use GIT, which are also classified using CoFr SpIS.
{"title":"Towards strategy of geoinformation systems and technologies use for territory management","authors":"V. Shabaniuk, О. Dyshlyk","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2023.03.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2023.03.010","url":null,"abstract":"GeoInformation (GI) Systems (GIS) and GI Technologies (GIT, together GIST) have been used for almost half a century, since the creation of Canada's first GIS in the 60s of the last century, to solve territory management problems. Over the past years, GISTs have reached their maturity, but still continue to develop, covering ever wider areas of use. Even the science of geoinformatics has emerged, in which GIST is used mainly as a toolkit or technology. As an example, geoinformatics in the same Canada is called geomatics and is a technology and/or technological science. At the same time, the expansion of the field of GIST use poses to researchers the question of methods and methodology. They are followed by issues of methods and methodology of geoinformatics not only as a technology, but also as a science. Moreover, these issues become more complicated with the expansion of the field of use. In the information industry, together with the field of use, the term \"domain\" or \"context\" is used. Thus, modern GIST usage manipulate a large number of interrelated terms and concepts that are often not clearly defined. The work is devoted to the classification of the main ones, which are influenced by the strategy selected. Spatial models of territory are used in the work. They are used in the study of both territorial systems of reality and individual spatial entities and phenomena of reality. Among spatial models, the main attention is paid to information spatial models, the most famous of which are GeoInformation Systems (GIS). GIS are inseparable from GIS tools - GeoInformation Technologies (GIT). The main results of the article were obtained using the so-called method of Conceptual Frameworks (CoFr) of Spatial Information Systems (SpIS). The CoFr method is applied to a special class of GIS - Atlas Geo-Information Systems (AGIS) of large territories (LT). The AGIS class includes Electronic Atlases (EA), Atlas Information Systems (AtIS), Cartographic Information Systems (CIS) and, in fact, GIS, if we are talking about LT. AGIS-LT is a hierarchical echeloned SpIS, for which the main terms and concepts of the article are applicable. These are such terms and concepts as \"strategy\" and \"methodology\" of GIS usage. GIS, in turn, use GIT, which are also classified using CoFr SpIS.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"250 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135561752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.02
O. Dorosh, Y. Dorosh, V. Fomenko
On the basis of the analysis of the adopted changes to the land legislation and legal acts regulating land relations during the martial law, it was proved that their adoption was not done in a systematic way. It was found that the established special rules related to the implementation of land management and disposal of land plots for the period of martial law have different goals. It is about simplifying the procedure for disposal of agricultural lands – on the one hand, and on the other hand – activities in the field of land management, land cadastre and land valuation are complicated. It is substantiated that the changes that were made urgently highlighted the problem of imperfect land legislation in general, since the land legislation in force before the start of the war was designed exclusively for peacetime, because the issues of public access to sensitive information, such as: cartographic information, information on the purpose of land plots, names of land uses, names of subjects of land relations, etc. It has been established that the problem related to the provision of business entities and citizens under martial law for the provision of services for the preparation of land management documentation, topographical, geodetic and cartographic works has been resolved. For this purpose, the provision of special permits by the Security Service of Ukraine has been introduced. The urgent need for systematic adjustment of land legislation, both in the context of land management during the period of martial law and after its end (recovery period), as well as the need for harmonization of legislation in connection with European integration, which will become the basis for further research, is substantiated.
{"title":"Implementation of land management under the conditions of marital law","authors":"O. Dorosh, Y. Dorosh, V. Fomenko","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.02","url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of the analysis of the adopted changes to the land legislation and legal acts regulating land relations during the martial law, it was proved that their adoption was not done in a systematic way. It was found that the established special rules related to the implementation of land management and disposal of land plots for the period of martial law have different goals. It is about simplifying the procedure for disposal of agricultural lands – on the one hand, and on the other hand – activities in the field of land management, land cadastre and land valuation are complicated. It is substantiated that the changes that were made urgently highlighted the problem of imperfect land legislation in general, since the land legislation in force before the start of the war was designed exclusively for peacetime, because the issues of public access to sensitive information, such as: cartographic information, information on the purpose of land plots, names of land uses, names of subjects of land relations, etc. It has been established that the problem related to the provision of business entities and citizens under martial law for the provision of services for the preparation of land management documentation, topographical, geodetic and cartographic works has been resolved. For this purpose, the provision of special permits by the Security Service of Ukraine has been introduced. The urgent need for systematic adjustment of land legislation, both in the context of land management during the period of martial law and after its end (recovery period), as well as the need for harmonization of legislation in connection with European integration, which will become the basis for further research, is substantiated.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70003626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2023.02.012
V. Chabaniuk, O. Dyshlyk, V. Pioro
Abstract. The article is the final in a series of articles on Conceptual Provisions for the Creation of a New Electronic State Register of Immovable Cultural Heritage (CH) of Ukraine. These provisions correspond to the components of the Solutions Framework (SoFr) of special Spatial Information Systems (SpIS) defined in the monograph [15]. The special SpIS of the new registry of the CH of Ukraine should belong to the class of Atlas Geoinformation Systems (AGIS), which is described in [14]. The first queue of AGIS – AGIS-CH1 – is proposed as the first queue of the new electronic State Register of Immovable CH of Ukraine. The first queue should include, at least, three components that are simultaneously SoFr packages: Products-Processes-Basics. The conceptual provisions of AGIS-CH1 describe these three most important components of the architectural pattern of AGIS-CH1: AGIS-CH1.Products, Part 1 [17]; AGIS-CH1.Processes, Part 2 [18], AGIS-CH1.Basics, Part 3, consisting of two subparts, 3.1 and 3.2. Subpart 3.1 is described in the article [19]. This article describes subpart 3.2, which is called "Basics. CIDOC CRM". It consists of two main sections. The first of these initially examines the prerequisites that lead to the use of CIDOC CRM. Such prerequisites are two evolutions: system and subject. System evolution claims that the time has come to consider the registry of the CH of Ukraine as a SpIS of the Web 3.0 Formation, also known as the Semantic Web, especially if we have in mind the creation of a new registry. Subject evolution refers to the evolution of understanding of the domain of cultural heritage. From the review of this issue in the monograph [4], it is obvious that modern CH registers should be "process" rather than "product". In order to proceed to the consideration of CIDOC CRM with a better understanding of the essence of the issue, the CHARM model (Cultural Heritage Abstract Reference Model) was considered. CIDOC CRM can also be considered as such, but CHARM is described in an excellent monograph [4] that is practically applicable, unlike the scattered articles on CIDOC CRM. The second of the two main sections of the article deals with CIDOC CRM and its use. We do not describe CIDOC CRM completely. Attention is paid only to its "spatial" and "process" parts. In addition, attention is paid to the use of CIDOC CRM. For this, the information from the website (https://www.cidoc-crm.org/how-i-can-use-cidoc-crm, 2023-jun-26) is used first. Then there is some initial information about the Arches software platform. We offer the Arches platform for the implementation of AGIS-CH1.
{"title":"CIDOC CRM as the basis of the Electronic State Register of Immovable Cultural Heritage of Ukraine","authors":"V. Chabaniuk, O. Dyshlyk, V. Pioro","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2023.02.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2023.02.012","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The article is the final in a series of articles on Conceptual Provisions for the Creation of a New Electronic State Register of Immovable Cultural Heritage (CH) of Ukraine. These provisions correspond to the components of the Solutions Framework (SoFr) of special Spatial Information Systems (SpIS) defined in the monograph [15]. The special SpIS of the new registry of the CH of Ukraine should belong to the class of Atlas Geoinformation Systems (AGIS), which is described in [14]. The first queue of AGIS – AGIS-CH1 – is proposed as the first queue of the new electronic State Register of Immovable CH of Ukraine. The first queue should include, at least, three components that are simultaneously SoFr packages: Products-Processes-Basics. The conceptual provisions of AGIS-CH1 describe these three most important components of the architectural pattern of AGIS-CH1: AGIS-CH1.Products, Part 1 [17]; AGIS-CH1.Processes, Part 2 [18], AGIS-CH1.Basics, Part 3, consisting of two subparts, 3.1 and 3.2. Subpart 3.1 is described in the article [19]. This article describes subpart 3.2, which is called \"Basics. CIDOC CRM\". It consists of two main sections. The first of these initially examines the prerequisites that lead to the use of CIDOC CRM. Such prerequisites are two evolutions: system and subject. System evolution claims that the time has come to consider the registry of the CH of Ukraine as a SpIS of the Web 3.0 Formation, also known as the Semantic Web, especially if we have in mind the creation of a new registry. Subject evolution refers to the evolution of understanding of the domain of cultural heritage. From the review of this issue in the monograph [4], it is obvious that modern CH registers should be \"process\" rather than \"product\". In order to proceed to the consideration of CIDOC CRM with a better understanding of the essence of the issue, the CHARM model (Cultural Heritage Abstract Reference Model) was considered. CIDOC CRM can also be considered as such, but CHARM is described in an excellent monograph [4] that is practically applicable, unlike the scattered articles on CIDOC CRM. The second of the two main sections of the article deals with CIDOC CRM and its use. We do not describe CIDOC CRM completely. Attention is paid only to its \"spatial\" and \"process\" parts. In addition, attention is paid to the use of CIDOC CRM. For this, the information from the website (https://www.cidoc-crm.org/how-i-can-use-cidoc-crm, 2023-jun-26) is used first. Then there is some initial information about the Arches software platform. We offer the Arches platform for the implementation of AGIS-CH1.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70003862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.03
I. Novakovska, L. Skrypnyk, D. Novakovsky
The purposes of conducting an inventory of land plots and aspects of the legal regime of land use of historical and cultural purposes are presented. Problematic issues concerning the initial stage of the inventory of these lands within the settlements of Chernivtsi region are considered. The normative-legal basis for the establishment of protection zones of historical and cultural objects and their classification are analyzed. The peculiarities of the functioning of the program of land use and protection of the city of Kyiv and the distribution of the territory of the capital of Ukraine by historical areas are considered. The peculiarities of the inventory of land plots according to the Regional Program of Urban Cadastre Development and Spatial Planning for 2021-2025, which include objects of historical and cultural significance in the Lviv region, are described. A comparison was made between the problematic issues in the absence of inventory of historical and cultural lands, in particular the inclusion of objects in the databases of the state land cadastre, and the advantages that occur if the relevant inventory procedure.
{"title":"Land inventory of historical and cultural purpose","authors":"I. Novakovska, L. Skrypnyk, D. Novakovsky","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.03","url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of conducting an inventory of land plots and aspects of the legal regime of land use of historical and cultural purposes are presented. Problematic issues concerning the initial stage of the inventory of these lands within the settlements of Chernivtsi region are considered. The normative-legal basis for the establishment of protection zones of historical and cultural objects and their classification are analyzed. The peculiarities of the functioning of the program of land use and protection of the city of Kyiv and the distribution of the territory of the capital of Ukraine by historical areas are considered. The peculiarities of the inventory of land plots according to the Regional Program of Urban Cadastre Development and Spatial Planning for 2021-2025, which include objects of historical and cultural significance in the Lviv region, are described. A comparison was made between the problematic issues in the absence of inventory of historical and cultural lands, in particular the inclusion of objects in the databases of the state land cadastre, and the advantages that occur if the relevant inventory procedure.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70003060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.07
O. Sakal, G. Kolisnyk, R. Kharytonenko
The expediency of reviewing the development of the institutional environment of modern land relations has been established, as it is the main factor in the formation of a new paradigm of land management development. Institutions that together form the institutional environment of land relations according to the formal approach are proposed and characterized: institute of land ownership, institute of land use law, institute of land use payment, institute of municipality, institute of state control, institute of land accounting, institute of land use for agriculture, institute land use, institute of communication. It is established that long-term dynamic processes of interaction in land relations, revision and improvement of the institutional environment need to be modernized through the implementation of new institutions. It is emphasized that the trends of economic development and productive forces require a review of the balance of economic, environmental and social priorities related to sustainable use, protection and reproduction of land potential, which can be realized through land management measures. It is determined that at the state, regional and local levels the same institutions that affect land relations have different tasks, content and tools for the implementation of their powers in terms of use, protection and reproduction of land potential.
{"title":"Institutional environment of modern land relations","authors":"O. Sakal, G. Kolisnyk, R. Kharytonenko","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.07","url":null,"abstract":"The expediency of reviewing the development of the institutional environment of modern land relations has been established, as it is the main factor in the formation of a new paradigm of land management development. Institutions that together form the institutional environment of land relations according to the formal approach are proposed and characterized: institute of land ownership, institute of land use law, institute of land use payment, institute of municipality, institute of state control, institute of land accounting, institute of land use for agriculture, institute land use, institute of communication. It is established that long-term dynamic processes of interaction in land relations, revision and improvement of the institutional environment need to be modernized through the implementation of new institutions. It is emphasized that the trends of economic development and productive forces require a review of the balance of economic, environmental and social priorities related to sustainable use, protection and reproduction of land potential, which can be realized through land management measures. It is determined that at the state, regional and local levels the same institutions that affect land relations have different tasks, content and tools for the implementation of their powers in terms of use, protection and reproduction of land potential.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70003206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.08
A. Tretiak, V. Tretiak, O. Kovalyshyn
The decision to cancel land economic assessment out of the land valuation works needs scientific substantiation and consideration of the world practice of its application. The research aims to study how the concept of “economic assessment” in used in the world practice, as well as analyzes its essence and performed tasks. The article supplies analysis of the legislative and regulatory problems of development of the economic assessment of land, land resources and land use as an important economic instrument of land relations regulation and territorial spatial development of land use in Ukraine. The research examines the thesaurus framework concerning public requests for the notions of “economic assessment of land”, “economic assessment of land use”, “economic assessment of land resources” and “economic assessment of natural resources”, “land valuation”, “land use valuation” and “land resources valuation”. It is confirmed that the concepts of “economic assessment of land”, “economic assessment of land resources”, “economic assessment of natural resources” are less often used in the world practice as compared to such notion as “economic assessment of land use”. However, in the world practice, the most widely used notion is “land use valuation”, the second position is taken by “land resources valuation”, whereas “land valuation” is rarely used. It is confirmed that the notion of “economic assessment” is up-to-date and is widely used in the developed market economies. In Ukraine, the concept of “economic assessment of land” is not quite correct. To activate scientific researches and to shape the legislative and regulatory supply for development of economic assessment of land and other natural resources, as well as land use, the work clears up the conceptual essence, which should be interpreted as a money expression of economic or social value of both economic and environmental assets, determined by natural peculiarities. Findings of the research confirm that economic assessment determines the value of land, land resources and land use that is estimated by the effect, which the land-holder obtains from using the land or other natural resources within the ecosystem area. The research defines their targeted use. It is identified that the objects of economic assessment include land, land resources, land use, ecosystem services, land and environmental losses. Prospects of the further research involves studying the targeted use for effective employment of the economic assessment objects.
{"title":"Economic assessment of land: scientific, legislative and regulatory problems of development","authors":"A. Tretiak, V. Tretiak, O. Kovalyshyn","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.08","url":null,"abstract":"The decision to cancel land economic assessment out of the land valuation works needs scientific substantiation and consideration of the world practice of its application. The research aims to study how the concept of “economic assessment” in used in the world practice, as well as analyzes its essence and performed tasks. The article supplies analysis of the legislative and regulatory problems of development of the economic assessment of land, land resources and land use as an important economic instrument of land relations regulation and territorial spatial development of land use in Ukraine. The research examines the thesaurus framework concerning public requests for the notions of “economic assessment of land”, “economic assessment of land use”, “economic assessment of land resources” and “economic assessment of natural resources”, “land valuation”, “land use valuation” and “land resources valuation”. It is confirmed that the concepts of “economic assessment of land”, “economic assessment of land resources”, “economic assessment of natural resources” are less often used in the world practice as compared to such notion as “economic assessment of land use”. However, in the world practice, the most widely used notion is “land use valuation”, the second position is taken by “land resources valuation”, whereas “land valuation” is rarely used. It is confirmed that the notion of “economic assessment” is up-to-date and is widely used in the developed market economies. In Ukraine, the concept of “economic assessment of land” is not quite correct. To activate scientific researches and to shape the legislative and regulatory supply for development of economic assessment of land and other natural resources, as well as land use, the work clears up the conceptual essence, which should be interpreted as a money expression of economic or social value of both economic and environmental assets, determined by natural peculiarities. Findings of the research confirm that economic assessment determines the value of land, land resources and land use that is estimated by the effect, which the land-holder obtains from using the land or other natural resources within the ecosystem area. The research defines their targeted use. It is identified that the objects of economic assessment include land, land resources, land use, ecosystem services, land and environmental losses. Prospects of the further research involves studying the targeted use for effective employment of the economic assessment objects.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70003216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2022.04.02
O. Dorosh, A. Dorosh, V. Saliuta, D. Melnyk
The concepts of institutions and institutional approaches are studied. On the basis of institutional approaches to the planning of sustainable use and protection of agricultural lands of individual land uses, a system of institutes was formed, which include: the Institute of Land Management, the Institute of Land Monitoring, the Institute of the State Land Cadastre, the Institute of Local Self-Government, and the Institute of Local Traditions. The importance and effectiveness of these institutions, namely as systems and their relevance, are substantiated. The tools of these institutes, which allow for planning the sustainable use and protection of agricultural lands of individual land uses, as well as their implementation, have been analysed. The institute of land management and its tools, such as land management schemes and technical and economic justifications for the use and protection of lands of administrative territorial units, territories of territorial communities, and complex plans for the spatial development of the territory of the territorial community, are analysed in detail. The need to introduce a tool of land management regulations to expand the possibilities of the institute of land management in planning the use of territories located outside of settlements is justified. The importance of the institution of land monitoring is substantiated and the urgency of creating and implementing an automated land monitoring system is emphasized. The current state of the Institute of the State Land Cadastre was investigated and the expediency of expanding the list of objects of the State Land Cadastre by adding "agricultural land use" was substantiated. It was found that the significance of the institution of local self-government in the context of planning the sustainable use and protection of agricultural lands of individual land uses increases due to the expansion of the powers of local authorities in the process of decentralization of power. The need to take into account local agricultural traditions when planning the sustainable use and protection of agricultural lands of individual land uses has been confirmed.
{"title":"Institutional approaches to the planning of sustainable use and protection of agricultural lands on the territory of individual land uses","authors":"O. Dorosh, A. Dorosh, V. Saliuta, D. Melnyk","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2022.04.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2022.04.02","url":null,"abstract":"The concepts of institutions and institutional approaches are studied. On the basis of institutional approaches to the planning of sustainable use and protection of agricultural lands of individual land uses, a system of institutes was formed, which include: the Institute of Land Management, the Institute of Land Monitoring, the Institute of the State Land Cadastre, the Institute of Local Self-Government, and the Institute of Local Traditions. The importance and effectiveness of these institutions, namely as systems and their relevance, are substantiated. The tools of these institutes, which allow for planning the sustainable use and protection of agricultural lands of individual land uses, as well as their implementation, have been analysed. The institute of land management and its tools, such as land management schemes and technical and economic justifications for the use and protection of lands of administrative territorial units, territories of territorial communities, and complex plans for the spatial development of the territory of the territorial community, are analysed in detail. The need to introduce a tool of land management regulations to expand the possibilities of the institute of land management in planning the use of territories located outside of settlements is justified. The importance of the institution of land monitoring is substantiated and the urgency of creating and implementing an automated land monitoring system is emphasized. The current state of the Institute of the State Land Cadastre was investigated and the expediency of expanding the list of objects of the State Land Cadastre by adding \"agricultural land use\" was substantiated. It was found that the significance of the institution of local self-government in the context of planning the sustainable use and protection of agricultural lands of individual land uses increases due to the expansion of the powers of local authorities in the process of decentralization of power. The need to take into account local agricultural traditions when planning the sustainable use and protection of agricultural lands of individual land uses has been confirmed.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70003036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.04
M. Malashevskyi, O. Malashevska
The article addresses the question of the optimization of forest and agricultural land tenure in the environment of natural afforestation in accordance with the aims of sustainable development. The topicality of the research is predefined by the need for the increase of areas occupied by forests according to the legislative initiatives, need for the improvement of agricultural land, the improvement of ecology in the environment of insufficient afforestation. The resolving of the problem of self-afforested agricultural land plots in the process of land consolidation has been suggested. Approaches to the problem of natural agricultural land afforestation have been singled out, advantages and perspectives of land consolidation as compared to other approaches have been substantiated. The involvement of land plots defined as escheated inheritance and non-recalled land shares to the process of land reallotment at land consolidation has been suggested. The adjustment of the land reallotment methodology at land consolidation in the environment of natural afforestation of agricultural land has been suggested. As the result of reallotment, trees were kept on the afforested land plots, a joint consolidated forest mass was formed, the configuration of land plots was improved, road network was improved. The results can be used at the implementation of the Large-scale Afforestation of Ukraine environmental initiative, and in the following scientific research on land tenure and use spatial improvement.
{"title":"The consolidation of the afforested agricultural land","authors":"M. Malashevskyi, O. Malashevska","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.04","url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the question of the optimization of forest and agricultural land tenure in the environment of natural afforestation in accordance with the aims of sustainable development. The topicality of the research is predefined by the need for the increase of areas occupied by forests according to the legislative initiatives, need for the improvement of agricultural land, the improvement of ecology in the environment of insufficient afforestation. The resolving of the problem of self-afforested agricultural land plots in the process of land consolidation has been suggested. Approaches to the problem of natural agricultural land afforestation have been singled out, advantages and perspectives of land consolidation as compared to other approaches have been substantiated. The involvement of land plots defined as escheated inheritance and non-recalled land shares to the process of land reallotment at land consolidation has been suggested. The adjustment of the land reallotment methodology at land consolidation in the environment of natural afforestation of agricultural land has been suggested. As the result of reallotment, trees were kept on the afforested land plots, a joint consolidated forest mass was formed, the configuration of land plots was improved, road network was improved. The results can be used at the implementation of the Large-scale Afforestation of Ukraine environmental initiative, and in the following scientific research on land tenure and use spatial improvement.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70003093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：