首页 > 最新文献

Journal of applied animal ethics research最新文献

英文 中文
Morality and Meat in the Middle Ages and Beyond 中世纪及以后的道德与肉食
Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI: 10.5406/21601267.13.1.07
Christene D'anca
Abstract:Food is intimately associated with the body, and what a person chooses to consume can easily be used to craft one's identity. Food brings people together, in much the same way as culinary preferences can divide. As veganism is gaining traction around the world, this article examines its origins in religious practices, philosophy, literature, and economic trade within the Middle Ages, elucidating how contemporary decisions to abstain from animal consumption mirror medieval ones and further how similar obstacles to this lifestyle exist today.
摘要:食物与身体有着密切的联系,一个人选择吃什么很容易被用来塑造一个人的身份。食物将人们聚集在一起,就像烹饪偏好可以分裂一样。随着素食主义在世界范围内越来越受欢迎,本文考察了它在中世纪的宗教实践、哲学、文学和经济贸易中的起源,阐明了当代对动物消费的决定是如何反映中世纪的,并进一步说明了这种生活方式的类似障碍在今天是如何存在的。
{"title":"Morality and Meat in the Middle Ages and Beyond","authors":"Christene D'anca","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.07","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Food is intimately associated with the body, and what a person chooses to consume can easily be used to craft one's identity. Food brings people together, in much the same way as culinary preferences can divide. As veganism is gaining traction around the world, this article examines its origins in religious practices, philosophy, literature, and economic trade within the Middle Ages, elucidating how contemporary decisions to abstain from animal consumption mirror medieval ones and further how similar obstacles to this lifestyle exist today.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"21 3 1","pages":"61 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85441828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mouth of the Donkey: Re-imagining Biblical Animals by Laura Duhan-Kaplan (review) 《驴嘴:重新想象圣经中的动物》劳拉·杜汉-卡普兰著(书评)
Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI: 10.5406/21601267.13.1.17
Edward C. Sellner
The result stresses a more creation-friendly and creature-friendly understanding of the Godhead (p. 151). While holding to a traditional/orthodox understanding of the Trinity, this presentation of the Father as Gentleness, the Son as Solidarity, and the Holy Spirit as Fraternity “highlight[s] the different ways in which we experience God’s love” (p. 151). Further, inspired by Boff and the biblical witness, it helps us “glimpse something of the divine in relation to all creation” (p. 153; see further pp. 151–153, 159, 167). Second, her efforts to distinguish the connected but disparate concerns and priorities of ecological and animal theology—a discussion emerging largely from her critique of Boff’s Ecology and Liberation: A New Paradigm (1993; English translation 1995)—is welcome. As she explains in various places, the former’s attention to sustaining holistic systems as opposed to consideration of individual animals within them is more consequential in its implications than many realize (p. 34; cf. pp. 10, 174). She devotes a full chapter (pp. 85–117) to questions stemming from these different disciplines. Third, her attention to region-specific concerns in her theological work on Boff and animals is an instructive model (see, e.g., the series of interviews in the appendices, pp. 170–194). Boff is a contextual theologian (pp. 35, 77, 99–100, etc.), and Linzey introduces readers to the Brazilian setting that informs his writing (pp. 35–38). This illustration of contextually sensitive animal thought is helpful, serving to remind readers that regional/national cultural, political, and social issues shape animal welfare efforts. This thoroughly researched and innovative study is a valuable contribution to the field and is sure to (or at least ought to) prompt further attention to the place of animals in Catholic and liberation theological discourses in the years to come. Highly recommended. Mouth of the Donkey: Re-imagining Biblical Animals. By Laura Duhan-Kaplan. (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2021. 84 + ix pp. Paperback. $15.00. ISBN: 978-1-7252-5905-8.)
结果强调对神性有一种更有利于创造和受造物的理解(第151页)。在坚持对三位一体的传统/正统理解的同时,圣父是温柔的,圣子是团结的,圣神是博爱的这种表述“突出了我们体验上帝之爱的不同方式”(第151页)。此外,受伯夫和圣经见证的启发,它帮助我们“瞥见与所有创造有关的神圣”(第153页;进一步见第151-153、159、167页)。其次,她努力区分生态神学和动物神学之间相互联系但又截然不同的关注和优先事项——这一讨论主要来自她对Boff的《生态与解放:新范式》(1993;英文翻译1995)-是受欢迎的。正如她在许多地方解释的那样,前者关注维持整体系统,而不是考虑其中的个体动物,其含义比许多人意识到的更重要(第34页;参见第10、174页)。她用了整整一章(第85-117页)来讨论来自这些不同学科的问题。第三,在她关于Boff和动物的神学著作中,她对特定地区的关注是一个有指导意义的模式(例如,参见附录中的一系列访谈,第170-194页)。Boff是一位背景神学家(第35页,第77页,第99-100页等),Linzey向读者介绍了他写作的巴西背景(第35 - 38页)。这个对环境敏感的动物思想的例证很有帮助,它有助于提醒读者,地区/国家的文化、政治和社会问题影响了动物福利的努力。这项深入研究和创新的研究是对该领域的宝贵贡献,并且肯定(或至少应该)在未来的几年里促使人们进一步关注动物在天主教和解放神学话语中的地位。强烈推荐。驴嘴:重新想象圣经中的动物。劳拉·杜汉-卡普兰著。俄勒冈州尤金:Cascade Books, 2021年出版。84 + ix页,平装本。15.00美元。ISBN: 978-1-7252-5905-8)。
{"title":"Mouth of the Donkey: Re-imagining Biblical Animals by Laura Duhan-Kaplan (review)","authors":"Edward C. Sellner","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.17","url":null,"abstract":"The result stresses a more creation-friendly and creature-friendly understanding of the Godhead (p. 151). While holding to a traditional/orthodox understanding of the Trinity, this presentation of the Father as Gentleness, the Son as Solidarity, and the Holy Spirit as Fraternity “highlight[s] the different ways in which we experience God’s love” (p. 151). Further, inspired by Boff and the biblical witness, it helps us “glimpse something of the divine in relation to all creation” (p. 153; see further pp. 151–153, 159, 167). Second, her efforts to distinguish the connected but disparate concerns and priorities of ecological and animal theology—a discussion emerging largely from her critique of Boff’s Ecology and Liberation: A New Paradigm (1993; English translation 1995)—is welcome. As she explains in various places, the former’s attention to sustaining holistic systems as opposed to consideration of individual animals within them is more consequential in its implications than many realize (p. 34; cf. pp. 10, 174). She devotes a full chapter (pp. 85–117) to questions stemming from these different disciplines. Third, her attention to region-specific concerns in her theological work on Boff and animals is an instructive model (see, e.g., the series of interviews in the appendices, pp. 170–194). Boff is a contextual theologian (pp. 35, 77, 99–100, etc.), and Linzey introduces readers to the Brazilian setting that informs his writing (pp. 35–38). This illustration of contextually sensitive animal thought is helpful, serving to remind readers that regional/national cultural, political, and social issues shape animal welfare efforts. This thoroughly researched and innovative study is a valuable contribution to the field and is sure to (or at least ought to) prompt further attention to the place of animals in Catholic and liberation theological discourses in the years to come. Highly recommended. Mouth of the Donkey: Re-imagining Biblical Animals. By Laura Duhan-Kaplan. (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2021. 84 + ix pp. Paperback. $15.00. ISBN: 978-1-7252-5905-8.)","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"25 1","pages":"103 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75456196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Meatsplaining: The Animal Agriculture Industry and the Rhetoric of Denial ed. by Jason Hannan (review) 《肉说教:畜牧业和否认的修辞》,作者:杰森·汉南(Jason Hannan)
Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI: 10.5406/21601267.13.1.10
Steven McMullen
fully meaningful only to it” (p. 195). In “The Stock Image,” Traisnel also touches upon Kantian philosophy, stating that we become aware of “the finitude of our sensorial faculties”—thus we cannot bridge any distance by “capturing” really anything (p. 157). In a heartbreaking finale, Traisnel makes this point frightenedly clear in that the capture regime leads to extinction. He recounts the heartbreaking fate of passenger pigeons in the sole survivor of Martha as the tragic result of biopower. Seen only through the lens of reproducibility, Martha remained infertile unto her death despite the best practices by conservationists. Understanding that we saw Martha as an object rather than as a subject who “sees” means that we, too, can only see her from our “milieu” as well. As a result, we can never really understand her infertility. Traisnel’s point to acknowledge animals at a distance is integral to a new ethics of care, and he is clear about what it should not look like. What it could like is left to the reader to ponder.
只有对它才完全有意义”(第195页)。在《存量影像》中,Traisnel也提到了康德哲学,他说我们意识到“我们感官能力的有限性”——因此我们不能通过“捕捉”任何东西来跨越任何距离(第157页)。在一个令人心碎的结局中,Traisnel把这一点说得非常清楚,因为捕获制度导致了灭绝。他讲述了玛莎唯一幸存者旅鸽令人心碎的命运,这是生物能源的悲惨结果。仅从可繁殖性的角度来看,尽管环保主义者采取了最好的做法,玛莎直到死都没有生育能力。我们把玛莎看作是一个客体,而不是一个“看”的主体,这意味着我们也只能从我们的“环境”中看到她。因此,我们永远无法真正理解她的不孕症。Traisnel的观点是,在一定距离内承认动物是一种新的关怀伦理的组成部分,他清楚地知道它不应该是什么样子。它会是什么样子留给读者去思考。
{"title":"Meatsplaining: The Animal Agriculture Industry and the Rhetoric of Denial ed. by Jason Hannan (review)","authors":"Steven McMullen","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.10","url":null,"abstract":"fully meaningful only to it” (p. 195). In “The Stock Image,” Traisnel also touches upon Kantian philosophy, stating that we become aware of “the finitude of our sensorial faculties”—thus we cannot bridge any distance by “capturing” really anything (p. 157). In a heartbreaking finale, Traisnel makes this point frightenedly clear in that the capture regime leads to extinction. He recounts the heartbreaking fate of passenger pigeons in the sole survivor of Martha as the tragic result of biopower. Seen only through the lens of reproducibility, Martha remained infertile unto her death despite the best practices by conservationists. Understanding that we saw Martha as an object rather than as a subject who “sees” means that we, too, can only see her from our “milieu” as well. As a result, we can never really understand her infertility. Traisnel’s point to acknowledge animals at a distance is integral to a new ethics of care, and he is clear about what it should not look like. What it could like is left to the reader to ponder.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"31 1","pages":"91 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87282400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Saving Animals: A Long Moral Arc 拯救动物:一条漫长的道德弧线
Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI: 10.5406/21601267.13.1.08
Lucille C. Thibodeau
Abstract:Saving Animals, a study of three different kinds of animal sanctuaries, is the first major ethnography to describe how sanctuaries "unmake" the notion of animals as property that reduces them to "bare life." The study relies on numerous engaging narratives about rescue animals, their mutual interactions, and their interactions with the people who care for them—narratives that illustrate how the sentience and subjectivity of animals provide a firm ground for the author's ethical considerations. An animal sanctuary is ideally an intentional community of cocitizens whose pragmatic and symbolic value resides in its ability to lay the foundation for a broad challenge to all violent practices of exploitation "targeted at a range of different others." The patient, incremental work of sanctuaries has implications not only for the future of human-animal relations but more broadly for the future of humans on the planet. The ultimate vision of sanctuaries is a world outside that mirrors the world inside, a pantopia where there will be no "others," only "us."
摘要:《拯救动物》研究了三种不同类型的动物保护区,是第一本描述保护区如何“消除”动物作为财产的概念的主要民族志,这种概念使动物沦为“赤裸的生命”。这项研究依赖于大量关于被救援动物的引人入胜的叙述,它们之间的相互作用,以及它们与照顾它们的人的互动——这些叙述说明了动物的感知和主观性如何为作者的伦理考虑提供了坚实的基础。理想的动物保护区是一个由共同公民组成的有意识的社区,它的实用主义和象征价值在于它能够为广泛挑战所有“针对不同群体”的暴力剥削行为奠定基础。庇护所耐心、渐进的工作不仅对人类与动物关系的未来有影响,而且对地球上人类的未来有更广泛的影响。避难所的终极愿景是一个反映内部世界的外部世界,一个没有“他人”,只有“我们”的泛色世界。
{"title":"Saving Animals: A Long Moral Arc","authors":"Lucille C. Thibodeau","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.08","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Saving Animals, a study of three different kinds of animal sanctuaries, is the first major ethnography to describe how sanctuaries \"unmake\" the notion of animals as property that reduces them to \"bare life.\" The study relies on numerous engaging narratives about rescue animals, their mutual interactions, and their interactions with the people who care for them—narratives that illustrate how the sentience and subjectivity of animals provide a firm ground for the author's ethical considerations. An animal sanctuary is ideally an intentional community of cocitizens whose pragmatic and symbolic value resides in its ability to lay the foundation for a broad challenge to all violent practices of exploitation \"targeted at a range of different others.\" The patient, incremental work of sanctuaries has implications not only for the future of human-animal relations but more broadly for the future of humans on the planet. The ultimate vision of sanctuaries is a world outside that mirrors the world inside, a pantopia where there will be no \"others,\" only \"us.\"","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"10 1","pages":"80 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82294055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
As We Forecast 正如我们预测的那样
Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI: 10.5406/21601267.13.1.01
Andrew Linzey, Clair Linzey, Ivy Borgohain, Jessica C. Tselepy, Alison Stone, Sarah Dimaggio, Colin H. Simonds, Christene D'anca, Lucille C. Thibodeau, Linda M. Johnson, Seán Butler, Steven McMullen, Nathaniel Otjen, Jacob Wirshba, D. Cassuto, R. Malamud, Damiano Benvegnù, Michael J. Gilmour, Edward C. Sellner
Abstract:Ethical and theological concern for nonhuman animals has been a primary characteristic of the neo-Vaiṣṇava movement of Assam, India. This concern is reflected in its strict prohibition of blood sacrifice or any kind of cruelty toward animals. At the same time, theologically, this faith puts all living beings, human and nonhuman, on an equal ontological footing and urges its followers to see God in all creatures. The present article looks at some of these concerns/considerations of this faith for nonhuman animals and, at the same time, also takes into account neo-Vaiṣṇavism's historical backdrop and a few of its inner contradictions.
摘要:对非人类动物的伦理和神学关注一直是印度阿萨姆邦neo-Vaiṣṇava运动的主要特征。这种关注反映在它严格禁止血祭或任何虐待动物的行为上。与此同时,在神学上,这种信仰把所有生物,人类和非人类,放在一个平等的本体论基础上,并敦促其追随者在所有生物身上看到上帝。本文着眼于这种信仰对非人类动物的一些关注/考虑,同时也考虑到neo-Vaiṣṇavism的历史背景和它的一些内在矛盾。
{"title":"As We Forecast","authors":"Andrew Linzey, Clair Linzey, Ivy Borgohain, Jessica C. Tselepy, Alison Stone, Sarah Dimaggio, Colin H. Simonds, Christene D'anca, Lucille C. Thibodeau, Linda M. Johnson, Seán Butler, Steven McMullen, Nathaniel Otjen, Jacob Wirshba, D. Cassuto, R. Malamud, Damiano Benvegnù, Michael J. Gilmour, Edward C. Sellner","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.01","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Ethical and theological concern for nonhuman animals has been a primary characteristic of the neo-Vaiṣṇava movement of Assam, India. This concern is reflected in its strict prohibition of blood sacrifice or any kind of cruelty toward animals. At the same time, theologically, this faith puts all living beings, human and nonhuman, on an equal ontological footing and urges its followers to see God in all creatures. The present article looks at some of these concerns/considerations of this faith for nonhuman animals and, at the same time, also takes into account neo-Vaiṣṇavism's historical backdrop and a few of its inner contradictions.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"30 1","pages":"1 - 1 - 1 - 101 - 101 - 103 - 103 - 105 - 105 - 107 - 108 - 110 - 13 - 14 - 20 - 21 - 30 - 31 - 47 -"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86325878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kinship With Our Fellow Creatures: Korsgaard's Kantian Account of Animal Ethics and the Moral Weight of Kinship 与我们同类的亲属关系:科斯加德对动物伦理的康德式解释和亲属关系的道德分量
Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI: 10.5406/21601267.13.1.05
Sarah Dimaggio
Abstract:In this article, I argue that kinship implicitly operates as a normative ethical concept in Christine Korsgaard's account of animal ethics. I begin with an examination of the key theoretical foundations of Korsgaard's account and then examine the ways kinship operates as an ethical concept in her account, arguing that the ethical obligations she discusses are fundamentally grounded in a recognition of kinship with other animals. I conclude by recognizing that there are many remaining questions about kinship and animal ethics but that the concept holds significant potential for thinking about the ethical obligations that we have to nonhuman animals.
摘要:本文认为,在克里斯汀·科斯加德(Christine Korsgaard)的动物伦理学论述中,亲属关系隐含地作为一种规范的伦理概念发挥作用。我首先考察了科斯加德理论的关键理论基础,然后考察了亲属关系在她的理论中作为一种伦理概念的运作方式,论证了她所讨论的伦理义务从根本上建立在对与其他动物的亲属关系的认识之上。最后,我承认,关于亲属关系和动物伦理还有许多问题有待解决,但这个概念在思考我们对非人类动物的道德义务方面具有重要的潜力。
{"title":"Kinship With Our Fellow Creatures: Korsgaard's Kantian Account of Animal Ethics and the Moral Weight of Kinship","authors":"Sarah Dimaggio","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.05","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this article, I argue that kinship implicitly operates as a normative ethical concept in Christine Korsgaard's account of animal ethics. I begin with an examination of the key theoretical foundations of Korsgaard's account and then examine the ways kinship operates as an ethical concept in her account, arguing that the ethical obligations she discusses are fundamentally grounded in a recognition of kinship with other animals. I conclude by recognizing that there are many remaining questions about kinship and animal ethics but that the concept holds significant potential for thinking about the ethical obligations that we have to nonhuman animals.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"97 1","pages":"31 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84671842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frances Power Cobbe and the Philosophy of Antivivisection 弗朗西斯·鲍尔·科布和反活体解剖的哲学
Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI: 10.5406/21601267.13.1.04
Alison Stone
Abstract:Frances Power Cobbe led the Victorian movement against vivisection. Cobbe is often remembered for her animal welfare campaigning, but it is rarely recognized that she approached animal welfare as a moral philosopher. In this article, I examine the philosophical basis of Cobbe's antivivisectionism. I concentrate on her 1875 article "The Moral Aspects of Vivisection," in which Cobbe first locates vivisection within the historical movement of Western civilization and the tendency for science to supersede religion and then endeavors to refute the defenses of vivisection one by one. I emphasize the philosophical considerations that led Cobbe to oppose animal experimentation on a reasoned basis.
摘要:弗朗西斯·鲍尔·科布领导了维多利亚时代反对活体解剖的运动。科布经常因为她的动物福利运动而被人们记住,但很少有人认识到她是作为一个道德哲学家来对待动物福利的。在这篇文章中,我考察了科布反活体解剖主义的哲学基础。我关注的是她1875年的文章《活体解剖的道德层面》,在这篇文章中,科布首先将活体解剖置于西方文明的历史运动和科学取代宗教的趋势之中,然后努力逐一驳斥活体解剖的辩护。我强调了导致科布在理性的基础上反对动物实验的哲学考虑。
{"title":"Frances Power Cobbe and the Philosophy of Antivivisection","authors":"Alison Stone","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.04","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Frances Power Cobbe led the Victorian movement against vivisection. Cobbe is often remembered for her animal welfare campaigning, but it is rarely recognized that she approached animal welfare as a moral philosopher. In this article, I examine the philosophical basis of Cobbe's antivivisectionism. I concentrate on her 1875 article \"The Moral Aspects of Vivisection,\" in which Cobbe first locates vivisection within the historical movement of Western civilization and the tendency for science to supersede religion and then endeavors to refute the defenses of vivisection one by one. I emphasize the philosophical considerations that led Cobbe to oppose animal experimentation on a reasoned basis.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"155 1","pages":"21 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88533319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Odontocetes (‘Toothed Whales’): Cognitive Science and Moral Standing – Are Dolphins Persons? 齿鲸(“齿鲸”):认知科学与道德立场——海豚是人吗?
Pub Date : 2023-01-18 DOI: 10.1163/25889567-bja10033
Sara G. Pettit, S. McCulloch
Odontocetes, or ‘toothed whales’, have a complex brain structure and possess rationality, self-awareness, sociability and culture. Cognitive science and modern theories of personhood challenge the notion that humans alone are moral persons. This paper reviews evidence from the cognitive science literature relevant to moral personhood in bottlenose dolphins, orcas, and beluga whales. It applies theories of personhood of Peter Singer, David DeGrazia, and Steven Wise, and finds that odontocetes fulfil criteria to be granted at least borderline personhood. The legal implications of attributing personhood to dolphins remains uncertain. Recognition of dolphin personhood may lead to fundamental legal rights against capture, captivity, and killing; alternatively, the courts may continue to restrict legal personhood and associated protections to human beings. Finally, despite the major influence of personhood on morality and law in the West, the biologically more widespread quality of sentience is sufficient for greater moral considerability and legal protections for nonhuman species.
齿鲸或“齿鲸”有复杂的大脑结构,具有理性、自我意识、社交能力和文化。认知科学和现代人格理论挑战了只有人类才是有道德的人的观念。本文回顾了认知科学文献中有关宽吻海豚、逆戟鲸和白鲸的道德人格的证据。它应用了彼得·辛格、大卫·德格拉齐亚和史蒂文·怀斯的人格理论,发现齿鲨至少符合被授予边缘性人格的标准。赋予海豚人格的法律含义仍然不确定。承认海豚的人格可能会带来反对捕获、囚禁和杀害的基本法律权利;或者,法院可以继续将法人资格和相关保护限制在人身上。最后,尽管人格对西方的道德和法律有重大影响,但生物学上更广泛的感知能力足以为非人类物种提供更大的道德可观性和法律保护。
{"title":"Odontocetes (‘Toothed Whales’): Cognitive Science and Moral Standing – Are Dolphins Persons?","authors":"Sara G. Pettit, S. McCulloch","doi":"10.1163/25889567-bja10033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25889567-bja10033","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Odontocetes, or ‘toothed whales’, have a complex brain structure and possess rationality, self-awareness, sociability and culture. Cognitive science and modern theories of personhood challenge the notion that humans alone are moral persons. This paper reviews evidence from the cognitive science literature relevant to moral personhood in bottlenose dolphins, orcas, and beluga whales. It applies theories of personhood of Peter Singer, David DeGrazia, and Steven Wise, and finds that odontocetes fulfil criteria to be granted at least borderline personhood. The legal implications of attributing personhood to dolphins remains uncertain. Recognition of dolphin personhood may lead to fundamental legal rights against capture, captivity, and killing; alternatively, the courts may continue to restrict legal personhood and associated protections to human beings. Finally, despite the major influence of personhood on morality and law in the West, the biologically more widespread quality of sentience is sufficient for greater moral considerability and legal protections for nonhuman species.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88063764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions on the Welfare and on the Behavior of Puppies and Dogs in Ireland 评估COVID-19限制对爱尔兰幼犬和狗的福利和行为的影响
Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI: 10.1163/25889567-bja10034
E. Walsh
The popularity of puppies/dogs as companions/playmates/walking buddies was highlighted in Ireland with COVID-19 restrictions in March/2020, when the demand for puppies/dogs increased as people were confined to within 2/km of their homes. However, what was the rational supporting this trend, the influences/research undertaken by prospective owners? Two online-surveys were conducted, targeting veterinarians and behaviorists to establish motivation/attitude to owning dogs and behavioral issues being presented. Interviews by phone were conducted with the Dublin Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Dog’s Trust and three Italian shelters for comparison purposes, to investigate the welfare of dogs during restrictions. An Garda Síochána (the National Police Service of Ireland) were contacted, to clarify the situation, in relation to dog theft and domestic abuse, which is strongly associated with animal abuse. Many factors may have influenced/impacted the epigenetic development of the behavior and resulting welfare of puppies/dogs, during this period.
2020年3月,爱尔兰实施了COVID-19限制措施,强调了小狗/狗作为同伴/玩伴/散步伙伴的受欢迎程度,当时由于人们被限制在离家2公里的范围内,对小狗/狗的需求增加了。然而,支持这一趋势的理性是什么,潜在业主的影响/研究是什么?针对兽医和行为学家进行了两项在线调查,以确定养狗的动机/态度以及出现的行为问题。为了进行比较,研究人员通过电话采访了都柏林防止虐待动物协会、狗的信托基金和三家意大利收容所,调查了限制期间狗的福利状况。联系了Garda Síochána(爱尔兰国家警察局),以澄清有关盗窃狗和家庭虐待的情况,这与虐待动物密切相关。在此期间,许多因素可能影响/影响了幼犬/狗的行为和由此产生的福利的表观遗传发展。
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions on the Welfare and on the Behavior of Puppies and Dogs in Ireland","authors":"E. Walsh","doi":"10.1163/25889567-bja10034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25889567-bja10034","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The popularity of puppies/dogs as companions/playmates/walking buddies was highlighted in Ireland with COVID-19 restrictions in March/2020, when the demand for puppies/dogs increased as people were confined to within 2/km of their homes. However, what was the rational supporting this trend, the influences/research undertaken by prospective owners? Two online-surveys were conducted, targeting veterinarians and behaviorists to establish motivation/attitude to owning dogs and behavioral issues being presented. Interviews by phone were conducted with the Dublin Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Dog’s Trust and three Italian shelters for comparison purposes, to investigate the welfare of dogs during restrictions. An Garda Síochána (the National Police Service of Ireland) were contacted, to clarify the situation, in relation to dog theft and domestic abuse, which is strongly associated with animal abuse. Many factors may have influenced/impacted the epigenetic development of the behavior and resulting welfare of puppies/dogs, during this period.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84798421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Let’s Talk about the Animals – Taking the Outcomes of Animal Models of Human Emotion and Affective Behavior Back to Understanding Animal Minds and Emotions 让我们谈谈动物——把人类情感和情感行为的动物模型的结果带回理解动物的思想和情感
Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI: 10.1163/25889567-bja10032
Augusta Gaspar, Constança Carvalho
The socioemotional lives of animals have been brought to light over the years by studies seeking to address specific topics in animal emotion, cognition and behavior. Breakthrough information has been provided by field work with natural communities, and notable advances have stemmed from non-invasive research with captive animals and from laboratory work entailing varying degrees of invasiveness. But there is a source of information on animals that has not always been integrated in the knowledge on animals’ emotional lives: the outputs of studies where animals served as models of human emotional processes but that were seldom published as literature on animals. This article proposes an integrated view whereby the vast amount of information amassed by the brain and behavioral sciences over the course of the last 30 years on the affective experiences of animals, their triggers, biomarkers and behavioral correlates is fully integrated in an account of animal emotions. Topics where this knowledge can accommodate further integration from studies with animals models of the human mind are the parental care and different types of affective bonds; the experience of empathic reactions, the association between emotions, expressive behavior and affective bonds, and conscience. Fostering further connection between these neuroscience and behavioral studies might contribute to 1) widening the breath of measures used in assessing the well-being of animals, 2) widening criteria used by ethical committees considering studies with animals, and 3) to review some common practices that by those who have key roles in the management of wild or captive animals.
多年来,通过寻求解决动物情感、认知和行为方面的特定主题的研究,动物的社会情感生活已经被揭示出来。对自然群落的实地工作提供了突破性的信息,对圈养动物的非侵入性研究和涉及不同程度侵入性的实验室工作取得了显著进展。但是,有一个关于动物的信息来源并不总是被整合到关于动物情感生活的知识中:动物作为人类情感过程模型的研究结果,但很少作为关于动物的文献发表。这篇文章提出了一个综合的观点,在过去的30年里,大脑和行为科学在动物的情感体验、触发因素、生物标志物和行为相关方面积累了大量的信息,这些信息被完全整合到动物情感的描述中。这些知识可以从人类思维的动物模型研究中进一步整合的主题是父母照顾和不同类型的情感纽带;共情反应的经验,情感之间的联系,表达行为和情感纽带,以及良心。促进这些神经科学和行为研究之间的进一步联系可能有助于:1)扩大用于评估动物福利的措施的范围;2)扩大伦理委员会考虑动物研究时使用的标准;3)审查那些在野生动物或圈养动物管理中发挥关键作用的人的一些常见做法。
{"title":"Let’s Talk about the Animals – Taking the Outcomes of Animal Models of Human Emotion and Affective Behavior Back to Understanding Animal Minds and Emotions","authors":"Augusta Gaspar, Constança Carvalho","doi":"10.1163/25889567-bja10032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25889567-bja10032","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The socioemotional lives of animals have been brought to light over the years by studies seeking to address specific topics in animal emotion, cognition and behavior. Breakthrough information has been provided by field work with natural communities, and notable advances have stemmed from non-invasive research with captive animals and from laboratory work entailing varying degrees of invasiveness. But there is a source of information on animals that has not always been integrated in the knowledge on animals’ emotional lives: the outputs of studies where animals served as models of human emotional processes but that were seldom published as literature on animals. This article proposes an integrated view whereby the vast amount of information amassed by the brain and behavioral sciences over the course of the last 30 years on the affective experiences of animals, their triggers, biomarkers and behavioral correlates is fully integrated in an account of animal emotions. Topics where this knowledge can accommodate further integration from studies with animals models of the human mind are the parental care and different types of affective bonds; the experience of empathic reactions, the association between emotions, expressive behavior and affective bonds, and conscience. Fostering further connection between these neuroscience and behavioral studies might contribute to 1) widening the breath of measures used in assessing the well-being of animals, 2) widening criteria used by ethical committees considering studies with animals, and 3) to review some common practices that by those who have key roles in the management of wild or captive animals.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82192601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of applied animal ethics research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1