The intentional alteration of the labia minora, known as labiaplasty, has shown increased prevalence across various populations in recent decades. While aesthetic, sexual, and psychological factors predominantly drive the desire for labiaplasty, there remain numerous unknown elements which influence a woman’s decision-making processes regarding this procedure. This study was undertaken to understand why Iranian women choose labiaplasty, examining the various motivations, influences, and considerations shaping their decision-making process. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were completed with 14 Iranian women who were seeking labiaplasty. The women were asked about their familiarity with labiaplasty, the motivations for undergoing the surgery, the sociocultural factors influencing their decisions, the process of seeking surgical intervention, their discussions with medical practitioners about concerns regarding their labia, and the reactions from their social circle about their decision to undergo surgery. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a content analysis. Three overarching clusters were derived from the analyses: (1) “Motivations” which included aesthetic concerns, physical or sexual discomfort; (2) “Influences”—a theme emerging from women’s narratives, encompassing factors such as facilitating beliefs, alongside the reported impact of health professionals, media, and social circle on their decision-making processes; and (3) “Navigating Stigma” which highlighted the stigma and sexual taboos which women identified as being linked to their experiences with choosing labiaplasty. The convergence of diverse personal and social dynamics plays a crucial role in shaping women’s decisions, leading them to seek labiaplasty. Consequently, preoperative psychological counseling appears to align more closely with the implementation of ethical principles, ensuring women make informed choices about their surgical options.
The causal relationships between pornography use, masturbation, moral incongruence, and mental health are poorly understood. While the link between problematic pornography use (PPU) and depression is well documented, the temporal dynamics associated with pornography use and masturbation have not yet been quantified. Utilizing an exploratory ecological momentary assessment (EMA) design, we measured the temporal dynamics of cognitive and affective state variables collected from 22 participants before, during, and after pornography use and masturbation, and examined the moderating role of moral incongruence in these relationships. Participants completed an initial survey followed by a four-week EMA, capturing data on sexual activities and cognitive and affective state variables. Bayesian hierarchical mixed-effects models were employed to analyze temporal dynamics. Findings suggest that pornography use and masturbation were linked to changes in affective and cognitive states that spiked both before and after sexual episodes. These states were generally more pronounced and sustained in participants with high moral incongruence, who experienced transient increases in shame, guilt, difficulty thinking, relationship disconnectedness, craving for sexual intercourse, and mood deterioration after pornography use and masturbation. These shifts typically persisted for several hours before decaying to baseline levels. High-incongruence participants also experienced strong spikes in craving prior to sexual episodes, while low-incongruence participants experienced craving spikes after pornography use and masturbation, indicating possible sensitization effects. Our findings also signalled potential evidence for “brain fog” following pornography use in both low and high-incongruence participants. Further, we discovered opponent process dynamics in the mood of high-incongruence participants, providing a possible causal mechanism that may explain how PPU can lead to depression.
Substance use is more prevalent among people of sexual minorities than among heterosexual people. Additional factors, such as having experienced higher rates of violence, may contribute to increased health risks and thereby exacerbate health inequalities among these individuals. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the association between different socioeconomic factors, sexual orientation, and having experienced sexual violence, with hazardous drinking and hazardous cannabis use in university students, considering gender. We carried out a cross-sectional study in a sample of university students from the UManresa Campus of the Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (Catalonia), during the 2021/2022 academic year, within the framework of the DESK-University project (n = 950). A total of 35.6% (n = 338) of the sample identified as boys and 64.4% (n = 612) as girls. In our study, we found that having experienced sexual violence with penetration (adjusted PR = 1.9, 95% CI [1.4, 2.7]) was associated with hazardous drinking in boys. In girls, hazardous drinking was associated with identifying as lesbian (adjusted PR = 1.9, 95% CI [1.2, 2.7]) and with having experienced sexual violence with physical contact (adjusted PR = 1.3, 95% CI (1.0, 1.7)]). Hazardous cannabis use was associated with having experienced sexual violence without physical contact in boys (adjusted PR = 3.4, 95% CI [1.1, 10.8]) and reporting a non-heterosexual orientation, especially in lesbian university students (adjusted PR = 9.9, 95% CI [1.6, 60.6]). Incorporating a gender perspective and recognizing affective-sexual diversity in health programs and public policies are essential steps toward removing barriers and reducing inequalities, ultimately leading to better health outcomes for young people.
A University of York review of research supporting gender affirming care (GAC) of gender dysphoric children and adolescents suggested that the research was of such poor quality that it could endanger the health of these patients. Cass used that finding to argue for restrictions on access to GAC. Without commenting on the University of York's review or the quality of research underlying GAC, I analyze Cass' recommendations for the quality of the research supporting restrictions on GAC and whether those restrictions endanger the health of children and adolescents. The current Commentary will show that Cass' recommendations are not supported by research and it is her recommendations that may present a danger to the health of gender dysphoric children and adolescents. Further analysis will show that such restrictions are ethically problematic and could worsen both the short- and long-term outcomes for gender dysphoric children, adolescents, and adults.

