Haiyan Zheng, Chiyuan Miao, Chris Huntingford, Paolo Tarolli, Dongfeng Li, Panos Panagos, Yao Yue, Pasquale Borrelli, Kristof Van Oost
Physical and chemical erosion associated with water both affect land–atmosphere carbon exchanges. However, previous studies have often addressed these processes separately or used oversimplified mechanisms, leading to ongoing debates and uncertainties about erosion-induced carbon fluxes. We provide an overview of the on-site carbon uptake fluxes induced by physical erosion (0.05–0.29 Pg C yr−1, globally) and chemical erosion (0.26–0.48 Pg C yr−1). Then, we discuss off-site carbon dynamics (during transport, deposition, and burial). Soil organic carbon mineralization during transport is nearly 0.37–1.20 Pg C yr−1 on the globe. We also summarize the overall carbon fluxes into estuaries (0.71–1.06 Pg C yr−1) and identify the sources of different types of carbon within them, most of which are associated with land erosion. Current approaches for quantifying physical-erosion-induced vertical carbon fluxes focus on two distinct temporal scales: short-term dynamics (ranging from minutes to decades), emphasizing net vertical carbon flux, and long-term dynamics (spanning millennial to geological timescales), examining the fate of eroded carbon over extended periods. In addition to direct chemical measurement and modeling approaches, estimation using indicators of riverine material is popular for constraining chemical-erosion-driven carbon fluxes. Lastly, we highlight the key challenges for quantifying related fluxes. To overcome potential biases in future studies, we strongly recommend integrated research that addresses both physical and chemical erosion over a well-defined timescale. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms driving erosion-induced lateral and vertical carbon fluxes is crucial for closing the global carbon budget.
与水有关的物理和化学侵蚀都影响陆地-大气碳交换。然而,以前的研究往往单独处理这些过程或使用过于简化的机制,导致关于侵蚀引起的碳通量的持续争论和不确定性。我们概述了物理侵蚀(全球范围内0.05-0.29 Pg C yr - 1)和化学侵蚀(0.26-0.48 Pg C yr - 1)诱导的现场碳吸收通量。然后,我们讨论了场外碳动力学(在运输、沉积和掩埋过程中)。运输过程中全球土壤有机碳矿化约为0.37 ~ 1.20 Pg C yr−1。我们还总结了河口的总体碳通量(0.71-1.06 Pg C yr−1),并确定了河口内不同类型碳的来源,其中大部分与土地侵蚀有关。目前量化物理侵蚀引起的垂直碳通量的方法侧重于两个不同的时间尺度:短期动态(从几分钟到几十年),强调净垂直碳通量;长期动态(跨越千年到地质时间尺度),研究长期侵蚀碳的命运。除了直接的化学测量和建模方法外,利用河流物质指标进行估算是限制化学侵蚀驱动的碳通量的常用方法。最后,我们强调了量化相关通量的主要挑战。为了克服未来研究中潜在的偏差,我们强烈建议在一个明确的时间尺度上进行物理和化学侵蚀的综合研究。全面了解侵蚀引起的横向和垂直碳通量的驱动机制对于关闭全球碳预算至关重要。
{"title":"The Impacts of Erosion on the Carbon Cycle","authors":"Haiyan Zheng, Chiyuan Miao, Chris Huntingford, Paolo Tarolli, Dongfeng Li, Panos Panagos, Yao Yue, Pasquale Borrelli, Kristof Van Oost","doi":"10.1029/2023RG000829","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2023RG000829","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Physical and chemical erosion associated with water both affect land–atmosphere carbon exchanges. However, previous studies have often addressed these processes separately or used oversimplified mechanisms, leading to ongoing debates and uncertainties about erosion-induced carbon fluxes. We provide an overview of the on-site carbon uptake fluxes induced by physical erosion (0.05–0.29 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>, globally) and chemical erosion (0.26–0.48 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>). Then, we discuss off-site carbon dynamics (during transport, deposition, and burial). Soil organic carbon mineralization during transport is nearly 0.37–1.20 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> on the globe. We also summarize the overall carbon fluxes into estuaries (0.71–1.06 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>) and identify the sources of different types of carbon within them, most of which are associated with land erosion. Current approaches for quantifying physical-erosion-induced vertical carbon fluxes focus on two distinct temporal scales: short-term dynamics (ranging from minutes to decades), emphasizing net vertical carbon flux, and long-term dynamics (spanning millennial to geological timescales), examining the fate of eroded carbon over extended periods. In addition to direct chemical measurement and modeling approaches, estimation using indicators of riverine material is popular for constraining chemical-erosion-driven carbon fluxes. Lastly, we highlight the key challenges for quantifying related fluxes. To overcome potential biases in future studies, we strongly recommend integrated research that addresses both physical and chemical erosion over a well-defined timescale. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms driving erosion-induced lateral and vertical carbon fluxes is crucial for closing the global carbon budget.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023RG000829","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142911873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rangjian Qiu, Gabriel G. Katul, Lu Zhang, Shunjing Qin, Xuelian Jiang
The significance of crop evapotranspiration (ETa) to climate science, agronomic research, and water resources is not in dispute. What continues to draw attention is how variability in ETa is driven by changing environments, abiotic stresses, and management practices. Here, the impacts of elevated CO2 concentration (e[CO2]), elevated ozone concentration (e[O3]), warming, abiotic stresses (water, salinity, heat stresses), and management practices (planting density, irrigation methods, mulching, nitrogen application) on cropland ETa were reviewed, along with their possible causes and estimation. Water and salinity stresses, e[O3], and drip irrigation adoption generally led to lower total growing–season ETa. However, total growing–season ETa responses to e[CO2], warming, heat stress, mulching, planting density, and nitrogen supplement appear inconsistent across empirical studies. The effects of e[CO2], e[O3], water and salinity stresses on total growing–season ETa are attributed to their influence on stomatal conductance, root water uptake, root and leaf area development, microclimate, and potentially phenology. Total growing–season ETa in response to warming is affected by variations in ambient growing–season mean air temperature and phenology. The differences in crop ETa under varying planting densities are due to their differences in leaf area. The responses of ETa to heat stress, mulching, and nitrogen application represent trade–off between their opposite effects on transpiration and evaporation, along with possibly phenology. Modified ETa models currently in use can estimate the response of ETa to the many aforementioned factors except for e[O3], heat stress, and nitrogen application. These factors offer a blueprint for future research inquiries.
{"title":"The Effects of Changing Environments, Abiotic Stresses, and Management Practices on Cropland Evapotranspiration: A Review","authors":"Rangjian Qiu, Gabriel G. Katul, Lu Zhang, Shunjing Qin, Xuelian Jiang","doi":"10.1029/2024RG000858","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2024RG000858","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The significance of crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>a</sub>) to climate science, agronomic research, and water resources is not in dispute. What continues to draw attention is how variability in ET<sub>a</sub> is driven by changing environments, abiotic stresses, and management practices. Here, the impacts of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (e[CO<sub>2</sub>]), elevated ozone concentration (e[O<sub>3</sub>]), warming, abiotic stresses (water, salinity, heat stresses), and management practices (planting density, irrigation methods, mulching, nitrogen application) on cropland ET<sub>a</sub> were reviewed, along with their possible causes and estimation. Water and salinity stresses, e[O<sub>3</sub>], and drip irrigation adoption generally led to lower total growing–season ET<sub>a</sub>. However, total growing–season ET<sub>a</sub> responses to e[CO<sub>2</sub>], warming, heat stress, mulching, planting density, and nitrogen supplement appear inconsistent across empirical studies. The effects of e[CO<sub>2</sub>], e[O<sub>3</sub>], water and salinity stresses on total growing–season ET<sub>a</sub> are attributed to their influence on stomatal conductance, root water uptake, root and leaf area development, microclimate, and potentially phenology. Total growing–season ET<sub>a</sub> in response to warming is affected by variations in ambient growing–season mean air temperature and phenology. The differences in crop ET<sub>a</sub> under varying planting densities are due to their differences in leaf area. The responses of ET<sub>a</sub> to heat stress, mulching, and nitrogen application represent trade–off between their opposite effects on transpiration and evaporation, along with possibly phenology. Modified ET<sub>a</sub> models currently in use can estimate the response of ET<sub>a</sub> to the many aforementioned factors except for e[O<sub>3</sub>], heat stress, and nitrogen application. These factors offer a blueprint for future research inquiries.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142905562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Becker, K. Seeger, A. Paszkowski, M. Marcos, F. Papa, R. Almar, P. Bates, C. France-Lanord, Md S. Hossain, Md J. U. Khan, M. A. Karegar, M. Karpytchev, N. Long, P. S. J. Minderhoud, J. Neal, R. J. Nicholls, J. Syvitski
Asian megadeltas, specifically the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna, Irrawaddy, Chao Phraya, Mekong, and Red River deltas host half of the world's deltaic population and are vital for Asian countries' ecosystems and food production. These deltas are extremely vulnerable to global change. Accelerating relative sea-level rise, combined with rapid socio-economic development intensifies these vulnerabilities and calls for a comprehensive understanding of current and future coastal flood dynamics. Here we provide a state-of-the-art on the current knowledge and recent advances in quantifying and understanding the drivers of coastal flood-related hazards in these deltas. We discuss the environmental and physical drivers, including climate influence, hydrology, oceanography, geomorphology, and geophysical processes and how they interact from short to long-term changes, including during extreme events. We also jointly examine how human disturbances, with catchment interventions, land use changes and resource exploitations, contribute to coastal flooding in the deltas. Through a systems perspective, we characterize the current state of the deltaic systems and provide essential insights for shaping their sustainable future trajectories regarding the multifaceted challenges of coastal flooding.
{"title":"Coastal Flooding in Asian Megadeltas: Recent Advances, Persistent Challenges, and Call for Actions Amidst Local and Global Changes","authors":"M. Becker, K. Seeger, A. Paszkowski, M. Marcos, F. Papa, R. Almar, P. Bates, C. France-Lanord, Md S. Hossain, Md J. U. Khan, M. A. Karegar, M. Karpytchev, N. Long, P. S. J. Minderhoud, J. Neal, R. J. Nicholls, J. Syvitski","doi":"10.1029/2024RG000846","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2024RG000846","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Asian megadeltas, specifically the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna, Irrawaddy, Chao Phraya, Mekong, and Red River deltas host half of the world's deltaic population and are vital for Asian countries' ecosystems and food production. These deltas are extremely vulnerable to global change. Accelerating relative sea-level rise, combined with rapid socio-economic development intensifies these vulnerabilities and calls for a comprehensive understanding of current and future coastal flood dynamics. Here we provide a state-of-the-art on the current knowledge and recent advances in quantifying and understanding the drivers of coastal flood-related hazards in these deltas. We discuss the environmental and physical drivers, including climate influence, hydrology, oceanography, geomorphology, and geophysical processes and how they interact from short to long-term changes, including during extreme events. We also jointly examine how human disturbances, with catchment interventions, land use changes and resource exploitations, contribute to coastal flooding in the deltas. Through a systems perspective, we characterize the current state of the deltaic systems and provide essential insights for shaping their sustainable future trajectories regarding the multifaceted challenges of coastal flooding.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024RG000846","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142832711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yuan Wang, Chenchong Zhang, Elyse A. Pennington, Liyin He, Jiani Yang, Xueying Yu, Yangfan Liu, John H. Seinfeld
Dramatic reductions in anthropogenic emissions during the lockdowns of the COVID-19 pandemic provide an unparalleled opportunity to assess responses of the Earth system to human activities. Here, we synthesize the latest progress in understanding changes in short-lived atmospheric constituents, that is, aerosols, ozone (O3), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and methane (CH4), in response to COVID-19 induced emission reductions and the associated climate impacts on regional and global scales. The large-scale emission reduction in the transportation sector reduced near-surface particulate and ozone concentrations, with certain regional enhancements modulated by atmospheric oxidizing capacity and abnormal meteorological conditions. The methane increase during the pandemic is a combined effect of fluctuations in methane emissions and chemical sinks. Global net radiative forcing of all short-lived species was found to be small, but regionally, aerosol radiative impacts during the lockdowns were discernible near China and India. Aerosol microphysical effects on clouds and precipitation were reported from modeling assessments only, except for observed reductions in aircraft contrails. There exist moderate climatic impacts of the pandemic on regional surface temperature, atmospheric circulations, and ecosystems, mainly over populous and polluted areas. Novel methodologies emerge in the pandemic-related research to achieve the synergy between observations from multiple platforms and model simulations and to overcome the enormous hurdles and sophistication in detection and attribution studies. The insight gained from COVID-19 research concerning the complex interplay between emission, chemistry, and meteorology, as well as the unexpected climate forcing-responses relationships, underscores future challenges for cleaning up the air and alleviating the adverse impacts of global warming.
{"title":"Short-Lived Air Pollutants and Climate Forcers Through the Lens of the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Yuan Wang, Chenchong Zhang, Elyse A. Pennington, Liyin He, Jiani Yang, Xueying Yu, Yangfan Liu, John H. Seinfeld","doi":"10.1029/2022RG000773","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2022RG000773","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dramatic reductions in anthropogenic emissions during the lockdowns of the COVID-19 pandemic provide an unparalleled opportunity to assess responses of the Earth system to human activities. Here, we synthesize the latest progress in understanding changes in short-lived atmospheric constituents, that is, aerosols, ozone (O<sub>3</sub>), nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>x</sub>), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), in response to COVID-19 induced emission reductions and the associated climate impacts on regional and global scales. The large-scale emission reduction in the transportation sector reduced near-surface particulate and ozone concentrations, with certain regional enhancements modulated by atmospheric oxidizing capacity and abnormal meteorological conditions. The methane increase during the pandemic is a combined effect of fluctuations in methane emissions and chemical sinks. Global net radiative forcing of all short-lived species was found to be small, but regionally, aerosol radiative impacts during the lockdowns were discernible near China and India. Aerosol microphysical effects on clouds and precipitation were reported from modeling assessments only, except for observed reductions in aircraft contrails. There exist moderate climatic impacts of the pandemic on regional surface temperature, atmospheric circulations, and ecosystems, mainly over populous and polluted areas. Novel methodologies emerge in the pandemic-related research to achieve the synergy between observations from multiple platforms and model simulations and to overcome the enormous hurdles and sophistication in detection and attribution studies. The insight gained from COVID-19 research concerning the complex interplay between emission, chemistry, and meteorology, as well as the unexpected climate forcing-responses relationships, underscores future challenges for cleaning up the air and alleviating the adverse impacts of global warming.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142804954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H. Nisbet, G. Buscarnera, J. W. Carey, M. A. Chen, E. Detournay, H. Huang, J. D. Hyman, P. K. Kang, Q. Kang, J. F. Labuz, W. Li, J. Matter, C. W. Neil, G. Srinivasan, M. R. Sweeney, V. R. Voller, W. Yang, Y. Yang, H. S. Viswanathan
Mineral carbon storage in mafic and ultramafic rock masses has the potential to be an effective and permanent mechanism to reduce anthropogenic CO2. Several successful pilot-scale projects have been carried out in basaltic rock (e.g., CarbFix, Wallula), demonstrating the potential for rapid CO2 sequestration. However, these tests have been limited to the injection of small quantities of CO2. Thus, the longevity and feasibility of long-term, large-scale mineralization operations to store the levels of CO2 needed to address the present climate crisis is unknown. Moreover, CO2 mineralization in ultramafic rocks, which tend to be more reactive but less permeable, has not yet been quantified. In these systems, fractures are expected to play a crucial role in the flow and reaction of CO2 within the rock mass and will influence the CO2 storage potential of the system. Therefore, consideration of fractures is imperative to the prediction of CO2 mineralization at a specific storage site. In this review, we highlight key takeaways, successes, and shortcomings of CO2 mineralization pilot tests that have been completed and are currently underway. Laboratory experiments, directed toward understanding the complex geochemical and geomechanical reactions that occur during CO2 mineralization in fractures, are also discussed. Experimental studies and their applicability to field sites are limited in time and scale. Many modeling techniques can be applied to bridge these limitations. We highlight current modeling advances and their potential applications for predicting CO2 mineralization in mafic and ultramafic rocks.
{"title":"Carbon Mineralization in Fractured Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks: A Review","authors":"H. Nisbet, G. Buscarnera, J. W. Carey, M. A. Chen, E. Detournay, H. Huang, J. D. Hyman, P. K. Kang, Q. Kang, J. F. Labuz, W. Li, J. Matter, C. W. Neil, G. Srinivasan, M. R. Sweeney, V. R. Voller, W. Yang, Y. Yang, H. S. Viswanathan","doi":"10.1029/2023RG000815","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2023RG000815","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mineral carbon storage in mafic and ultramafic rock masses has the potential to be an effective and permanent mechanism to reduce anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub>. Several successful pilot-scale projects have been carried out in basaltic rock (e.g., CarbFix, Wallula), demonstrating the potential for rapid CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration. However, these tests have been limited to the injection of small quantities of CO<sub>2</sub>. Thus, the longevity and feasibility of long-term, large-scale mineralization operations to store the levels of CO<sub>2</sub> needed to address the present climate crisis is unknown. Moreover, CO<sub>2</sub> mineralization in ultramafic rocks, which tend to be more reactive but less permeable, has not yet been quantified. In these systems, fractures are expected to play a crucial role in the flow and reaction of CO<sub>2</sub> within the rock mass and will influence the CO<sub>2</sub> storage potential of the system. Therefore, consideration of fractures is imperative to the prediction of CO<sub>2</sub> mineralization at a specific storage site. In this review, we highlight key takeaways, successes, and shortcomings of CO<sub>2</sub> mineralization pilot tests that have been completed and are currently underway. Laboratory experiments, directed toward understanding the complex geochemical and geomechanical reactions that occur during CO<sub>2</sub> mineralization in fractures, are also discussed. Experimental studies and their applicability to field sites are limited in time and scale. Many modeling techniques can be applied to bridge these limitations. We highlight current modeling advances and their potential applications for predicting CO<sub>2</sub> mineralization in mafic and ultramafic rocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023RG000815","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142665329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laurie S. Huning, Charlotte A. Love, Hassan Anjileli, Farshid Vahedifard, Yunxia Zhao, Pedro L. B. Chaffe, Kevin Cooper, Aneseh Alborzi, Edward Pleitez, Alexandre Martinez, Samaneh Ashraf, Iman Mallakpour, Hamed Moftakhari, Amir AghaKouchak
Globally, land subsidence (LS) often adversely impacts infrastructure, humans, and the environment. As climate change intensifies the terrestrial hydrologic cycle and severity of climate extremes, the interplay among extremes (e.g., floods, droughts, wildfires, etc.), LS, and their effects must be better understood since LS can alter the impacts of extreme events, and extreme events can drive LS. Furthermore, several processes causing subsidence (e.g., ice-rich permafrost degradation, oxidation of organic matter) have been shown to also release greenhouse gases, accelerating climate change. Our review aims to synthesize these complex relationships, including human activities contributing to LS, and to identify the causes and rates of subsidence across diverse landscapes. We primarily focus on the era of synthetic aperture radar (SAR), which has significantly contributed to advancements in our understanding of ground deformations around the world. Ultimately, we identify gaps and opportunities to aid LS monitoring, mitigation, and adaptation strategies and guide interdisciplinary efforts to further our process-based understanding of subsidence and associated climate feedbacks. We highlight the need to incorporate the interplay of extreme events, LS, and human activities into models, risk and vulnerability assessments, and management practices to develop improved mitigation and adaptation strategies as the global climate warms. Without consideration of such interplay and/or feedback loops, we may underestimate the enhancement of climate change and acceleration of LS across many regions, leaving communities unprepared for their ramifications. Proactive and interdisciplinary efforts should be leveraged to develop strategies and policies that mitigate or reverse anthropogenic LS and climate change impacts.
在全球范围内,土地沉降(LS)通常会对基础设施、人类和环境造成不利影响。随着气候变化加剧了陆地水文循环和极端气候的严重程度,必须更好地了解极端气候(如洪水、干旱、野火等)、土地沉降及其影响之间的相互作用,因为土地沉降可改变极端事件的影响,而极端事件可推动土地沉降。此外,一些导致沉降的过程(如富含冰的永久冻土降解、有机物氧化)已被证明也会释放温室气体,加速气候变化。我们的综述旨在综合这些复杂的关系,包括导致LS的人类活动,并确定不同地貌沉降的原因和速率。我们主要关注合成孔径雷达(SAR)时代,它极大地促进了我们对世界各地地面变形的理解。最终,我们找出了差距和机遇,以帮助制定通量监测、减缓和适应战略,并指导跨学科工作,进一步加深我们对沉降和相关气候反馈的过程性理解。我们强调,随着全球气候变暖,有必要将极端事件、LS 和人类活动的相互作用纳入模型、风险和脆弱性评估以及管理实践中,以制定更好的减缓和适应战略。如果不考虑这种相互作用和/或反馈回路,我们可能会低估气候变化的加剧和许多地区LS的加速,使社区对其后果毫无准备。应利用积极主动的跨学科努力来制定战略和政策,以减轻或扭转人为 LS 和气候变化的影响。
{"title":"Global Land Subsidence: Impact of Climate Extremes and Human Activities","authors":"Laurie S. Huning, Charlotte A. Love, Hassan Anjileli, Farshid Vahedifard, Yunxia Zhao, Pedro L. B. Chaffe, Kevin Cooper, Aneseh Alborzi, Edward Pleitez, Alexandre Martinez, Samaneh Ashraf, Iman Mallakpour, Hamed Moftakhari, Amir AghaKouchak","doi":"10.1029/2023RG000817","DOIUrl":"10.1029/2023RG000817","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Globally, land subsidence (LS) often adversely impacts infrastructure, humans, and the environment. As climate change intensifies the terrestrial hydrologic cycle and severity of climate extremes, the interplay among extremes (e.g., floods, droughts, wildfires, etc.), LS, and their effects must be better understood since LS can alter the impacts of extreme events, and extreme events can drive LS. Furthermore, several processes causing subsidence (e.g., ice-rich permafrost degradation, oxidation of organic matter) have been shown to also release greenhouse gases, accelerating climate change. Our review aims to synthesize these complex relationships, including human activities contributing to LS, and to identify the causes and rates of subsidence across diverse landscapes. We primarily focus on the era of synthetic aperture radar (SAR), which has significantly contributed to advancements in our understanding of ground deformations around the world. Ultimately, we identify gaps and opportunities to aid LS monitoring, mitigation, and adaptation strategies and guide interdisciplinary efforts to further our process-based understanding of subsidence and associated climate feedbacks. We highlight the need to incorporate the interplay of extreme events, LS, and human activities into models, risk and vulnerability assessments, and management practices to develop improved mitigation and adaptation strategies as the global climate warms. Without consideration of such interplay and/or feedback loops, we may underestimate the enhancement of climate change and acceleration of LS across many regions, leaving communities unprepared for their ramifications. Proactive and interdisciplinary efforts should be leveraged to develop strategies and policies that mitigate or reverse anthropogenic LS and climate change impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023RG000817","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142563106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}