首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry最新文献

英文 中文
Petition to end travel insurance discrimination against people with cancer. 请愿结束对癌症患者的旅行保险歧视。
IF 41.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00515-1
Manjulika Das
{"title":"Petition to end travel insurance discrimination against people with cancer.","authors":"Manjulika Das","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00515-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00515-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1261"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. 免疫检查点抑制剂对表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗进展的晚期表皮生长因子受体突变非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和安全性:系统综述、荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。
IF 41.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00379-6
Yi Zhao, Ying He, Wei Wang, Qi Cai, Fan Ge, Zisheng Chen, Jianqi Zheng, Yuan Zhang, Hongsheng Deng, Ying Chen, Shen Lao, Hengrui Liang, Wenhua Liang, Jianxing He
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments in treating individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain controversial. We aimed to review the literature to comprehensively investigate the individual and comparative clinical outcomes of various ICI-based treatment strategies in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we used single-arm, pairwise, and network meta-analytical approaches. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and relevant international conference proceedings from database inception to Jan 31, 2024, without language restrictions, to identify eligible clinical trials that assessed ICI-based treatments for individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on EGFR-TKIs. Studies considered eligible were published and unpublished phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical trials enrolling participants with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had progressed after at least one EGFR-TKI treatment, and that evaluated ICI-based treatment strategies on at least one of the clinical outcomes of interest. The primary outcome analysed was progression-free survival. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021292626.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>17 single-arm trials and 15 randomised controlled trials, involving 2886 participants and seven ICI-based treatment strategies (ICI monotherapy, ICI plus chemotherapy [ICI-chemo], ICI plus antiangiogenesis [ICI-antiangio], ICI plus antiangiogenesis plus chemotherapy [ICI-antiangio-chemo], dual ICIs [ICI-ICI], dual ICIs plus chemotherapy [ICI-ICI-chemo], and ICI plus EGFR-TKI [ICI-TKI]), were included. Three of these strategies-ICI monotherapy, ICI-antiangio-chemo, and ICI-chemo-had sufficient data across the included studies to perform a pairwise meta-analysis. The pairwise meta-analysis showed that, compared with chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy led to shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·73 [95% CI 1·30-2·29], I<sup>2</sup>=0%), whereas ICI-antiangio-chemo (HR 0·54 [0·44-0·67], I<sup>2</sup>=0%) and ICI-chemo (HR 0·77 [0·67-0·88], I<sup>2</sup>=0%) prolonged progression-free survival. The network meta-analysis showed that ICI-antiangio-chemo yielded the best progression-free survival results, with substantial benefits over ICI-chemo (HR 0·71 [95% credible interval 0·59-0·85]), ICI monotherapy (HR 0·30 [0·22-0·41]), and non-ICI treatment strategies including antiangio-chemo (HR 0·76 [0·58-1·00]) and chemotherapy alone (HR 0·54 [0·45-0·64]). ICI-antiangio-chemo was associated with higher risks of both any-grade and grade 3 or worse adverse events over ICI-chemo and chemotherapy in the network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>For individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who prog
背景:基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的治疗方法在治疗表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗进展的晚期表皮生长因子受体突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的临床获益仍存在争议。我们旨在回顾文献,全面研究基于 ICI 的各种治疗策略在这一人群中的个体和比较临床结果:在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们采用了单臂、配对和网络荟萃分析方法。我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov以及相关国际会议论文集,检索时间从数据库建立之初到2024年1月31日,没有语言限制,以确定符合条件的临床试验,这些临床试验评估了基于ICI的治疗方法,用于EGFR-TKIs治疗进展的晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者。符合条件的研究是已发表和未发表的 1、2 或 3 期临床试验,这些试验招募了组织学或细胞学确诊的晚期表皮生长因子受体突变 NSCLC 患者,这些患者在接受至少一种表皮生长因子受体-TKI 治疗后病情有所进展,而且这些试验评估了 ICI 治疗策略对至少一种相关临床结果的影响。分析的主要结果是无进展生存期。该方案已在 PROSPERO 注册,编号为 CRD42021292626:17项单臂试验和15项随机对照试验涉及2886名参与者和7种基于ICI的治疗策略(ICI单药治疗、ICI加化疗[ICI-chemo]、ICI加抗血管生成[ICI-antiangio]、ICI加抗血管生成加化疗[ICI-antiangio-chemo]、双ICIs[ICI-ICI]、双ICIs加化疗[ICI-ICI-chemo]和ICI加EGFR-TKI[ICI-TKI])。其中三种策略--ICI 单药治疗、ICI-抗组胺化疗和 ICI-化疗--在纳入的研究中有足够的数据进行配对荟萃分析。成对荟萃分析表明,与化疗相比,ICI单药治疗导致的无进展生存期更短(危险比[HR] 1-73 [95% CI 1-30-2-29],I2=0%),而ICI-抗血管化疗(HR 0-54 [0-44-0-67], I2=0%)和ICI-化疗(HR 0-77 [0-67-0-88], I2=0%)延长了无进展生存期。网络荟萃分析表明,ICI-抗强直-化疗的无进展生存率最佳,与ICI-化疗(HR 0-71 [95% 可信区间为0-59-0-85])、ICI单药治疗(HR 0-30 [0-22-0-41])以及包括抗强直-化疗(HR 0-76 [0-58-1-00])和单纯化疗(HR 0-54 [0-45-0-64])在内的非ICI治疗策略相比,ICI-抗强直-化疗获益巨大。在网络荟萃分析中,与ICI-化疗和化疗相比,ICI-抗强化疗发生任何级别和3级或更严重不良事件的风险更高:对于EGFR-TKIs治疗进展的晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者,ICI-抗肿瘤化疗被认为是最佳治疗方案。这种治疗方法的毒性是可以接受的,但需要谨慎对待。ICI-化疗的疗效明显优于常规化疗。这些研究结果明确了基于ICI的治疗策略在这一难以治疗的难治性人群中的作用,有可能对近期的指南起到补充作用:无。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Yi Zhao, Ying He, Wei Wang, Qi Cai, Fan Ge, Zisheng Chen, Jianqi Zheng, Yuan Zhang, Hongsheng Deng, Ying Chen, Shen Lao, Hengrui Liang, Wenhua Liang, Jianxing He","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00379-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00379-6","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments in treating individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain controversial. We aimed to review the literature to comprehensively investigate the individual and comparative clinical outcomes of various ICI-based treatment strategies in this population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we used single-arm, pairwise, and network meta-analytical approaches. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and relevant international conference proceedings from database inception to Jan 31, 2024, without language restrictions, to identify eligible clinical trials that assessed ICI-based treatments for individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on EGFR-TKIs. Studies considered eligible were published and unpublished phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical trials enrolling participants with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had progressed after at least one EGFR-TKI treatment, and that evaluated ICI-based treatment strategies on at least one of the clinical outcomes of interest. The primary outcome analysed was progression-free survival. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021292626.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;17 single-arm trials and 15 randomised controlled trials, involving 2886 participants and seven ICI-based treatment strategies (ICI monotherapy, ICI plus chemotherapy [ICI-chemo], ICI plus antiangiogenesis [ICI-antiangio], ICI plus antiangiogenesis plus chemotherapy [ICI-antiangio-chemo], dual ICIs [ICI-ICI], dual ICIs plus chemotherapy [ICI-ICI-chemo], and ICI plus EGFR-TKI [ICI-TKI]), were included. Three of these strategies-ICI monotherapy, ICI-antiangio-chemo, and ICI-chemo-had sufficient data across the included studies to perform a pairwise meta-analysis. The pairwise meta-analysis showed that, compared with chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy led to shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·73 [95% CI 1·30-2·29], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=0%), whereas ICI-antiangio-chemo (HR 0·54 [0·44-0·67], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=0%) and ICI-chemo (HR 0·77 [0·67-0·88], I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=0%) prolonged progression-free survival. The network meta-analysis showed that ICI-antiangio-chemo yielded the best progression-free survival results, with substantial benefits over ICI-chemo (HR 0·71 [95% credible interval 0·59-0·85]), ICI monotherapy (HR 0·30 [0·22-0·41]), and non-ICI treatment strategies including antiangio-chemo (HR 0·76 [0·58-1·00]) and chemotherapy alone (HR 0·54 [0·45-0·64]). ICI-antiangio-chemo was associated with higher risks of both any-grade and grade 3 or worse adverse events over ICI-chemo and chemotherapy in the network meta-analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation: &lt;/strong&gt;For individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who prog","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1347-1356"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Continued suboptimal HPV vaccine coverage in the USA. 美国的 HPV 疫苗覆盖率仍然不理想。
IF 41.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00394-2
Talha Burki
{"title":"Continued suboptimal HPV vaccine coverage in the USA.","authors":"Talha Burki","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00394-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00394-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1257"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Palliative radiotherapy versus best supportive care in patients with painful hepatic cancer (CCTG HE1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. 肝癌疼痛患者的姑息放疗与最佳支持治疗(CCTG HE1):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照的三期研究。
IF 41.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00438-8
Laura A Dawson, Jolie Ringash, Alysa Fairchild, Paul Stos, Kristopher Dennis, Aamer Mahmud, Teri Lynn Stuckless, Francois Vincent, David Roberge, Matthew Follwell, Raimond K W Wong, Derek J Jonker, Jennifer J Knox, Camilla Zimmermann, Philip Wong, Aisling S Barry, Marc Gaudet, Rebecca K S Wong, Thomas G Purdie, Dongsheng Tu, Christopher J O'Callaghan
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative treatment options for painful hepatic cancer can be restricted due to patients eventually becoming refractory to standard treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether radiotherapy improves hepatic pain from cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial (CCTG HE1) done in nine cancer centres across Canada, we included patients aged 18 years or older with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases, who were refractory to standard treatment, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3, with life expectancy of more than 3 months, and pain or discomfort at its worst in the past 24 hours on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) of at least 4 out of 10, which was stable for up to 7 days before randomisation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a minimisation method after stratification by centre and type of cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma vs liver metastases), to single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) to the liver with 8 mg ondansetron (or equivalent) orally and 4 mg dexamethasone orally given 1-2 h before radiotherapy plus best supportive care (including non-opioid or opioid analgesia, or dexamethasone, or a combination of these) or best supportive care alone. The primary endpoint was improvement in patient-reported liver cancer pain or discomfort of at least 2 points on worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month after randomisation. All patients with both baseline and 1-month assessments were included in the primary endpoint analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511522, and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between July 25, 2015, and June 2, 2022, 66 patients were screened and randomly assigned to radiotherapy plus best supportive care (n=33) or best supportive care (n=33). Median age was 65 years (IQR 57-72), 37 (56%) of 66 patients were male, 29 (44%) were female, 43 (65%) had liver metastases, and 23 (35%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (data on race and ethnicity were not collected). As of data cutoff (Sept 8, 2022), median follow-up was 3·2 months (95% CI 3·0-3·4). 24 (73%) of 33 in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group and 18 (55%) of 33 in the best supportive care only group completed baseline and 1-month assessments. An improvement in hepatic pain of at least 2 points in worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month was seen in 16 (67%) of 24 patients in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group versus four (22%) of 18 patients in the best supportive care group (p=0·0042). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events within 1 month after randomisation were abdominal pain (three [9%] of 33 in the radiotherapy group vs one [3%] of 33 in best supportive care group) and ascites (two [6%] vs one [3%]). No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths were observed.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </st
背景:肝癌疼痛的姑息治疗方案可能会受到限制,因为患者最终会对标准治疗产生耐药性。本研究旨在确定放疗是否能改善肝癌引起的疼痛:在加拿大9个癌症中心进行的这项开放标签、随机对照、3期试验(CCTG HE1)中,我们纳入了18岁或18岁以上的肝细胞癌或肝转移患者,这些患者对标准治疗难治,东部合作肿瘤学组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)表现为0-3级,预期寿命超过3个月,过去24小时内最严重的疼痛或不适在简短疼痛量表(BPI)中至少达到4级(满分10分),且在随机分配前7天内疼痛或不适情况稳定。按照中心和癌症类型(肝细胞癌与肝转移瘤)分层后,通过最小化方法将患者随机分配(1:1)至单次肝脏放疗(8 Gy),并在放疗前1-2小时口服8毫克昂丹司琼(或同等药物)和4毫克地塞米松,外加最佳支持治疗(包括非阿片类镇痛药或阿片类镇痛药,或地塞米松,或上述药物的组合),或仅进行最佳支持治疗。主要终点是在随机分配后1个月,患者报告的肝癌疼痛或不适在BPI最严重疼痛强度上至少改善2分。所有接受基线和1个月评估的患者均纳入主要终点分析。对所有随机分配接受治疗的患者进行了安全性评估。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02511522)上注册,并已完成:2015年7月25日至2022年6月2日期间,66名患者接受了筛查,并随机分配到放疗加最佳支持治疗(33人)或最佳支持治疗(33人)。中位年龄为65岁(IQR为57-72),66名患者中有37名(56%)为男性,29名(44%)为女性,43名(65%)有肝转移,23名(35%)有肝细胞癌(未收集种族和民族数据)。截至数据截止日(2022 年 9 月 8 日),中位随访时间为 3-2 个月(95% CI 3-0-3-4)。放疗加最佳支持治疗组的33人中有24人(73%)完成了基线和1个月评估,仅最佳支持治疗组的33人中有18人(55%)完成了基线和1个月评估。放疗加最佳支持治疗组的24名患者中,有16名(67%)在1个月时BPI最严重疼痛强度改善了至少2分,而最佳支持治疗组的18名患者中,有4名(22%)在1个月时BPI最严重疼痛强度改善了至少2分(P=0-0042)。随机化后1个月内最常见的3-4级不良反应是腹痛(放疗组33例中有3例[9%],最佳支持治疗组33例中有1例[3%])和腹水(2例[6%],1例[3%])。未观察到严重不良事件或与治疗相关的死亡:单剂量放疗加最佳支持治疗与单纯最佳支持治疗相比可改善肝癌患者的疼痛,可被视为一种标准的姑息治疗方法:加拿大癌症协会
{"title":"Palliative radiotherapy versus best supportive care in patients with painful hepatic cancer (CCTG HE1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.","authors":"Laura A Dawson, Jolie Ringash, Alysa Fairchild, Paul Stos, Kristopher Dennis, Aamer Mahmud, Teri Lynn Stuckless, Francois Vincent, David Roberge, Matthew Follwell, Raimond K W Wong, Derek J Jonker, Jennifer J Knox, Camilla Zimmermann, Philip Wong, Aisling S Barry, Marc Gaudet, Rebecca K S Wong, Thomas G Purdie, Dongsheng Tu, Christopher J O'Callaghan","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00438-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00438-8","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Palliative treatment options for painful hepatic cancer can be restricted due to patients eventually becoming refractory to standard treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether radiotherapy improves hepatic pain from cancer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial (CCTG HE1) done in nine cancer centres across Canada, we included patients aged 18 years or older with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases, who were refractory to standard treatment, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3, with life expectancy of more than 3 months, and pain or discomfort at its worst in the past 24 hours on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) of at least 4 out of 10, which was stable for up to 7 days before randomisation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a minimisation method after stratification by centre and type of cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma vs liver metastases), to single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) to the liver with 8 mg ondansetron (or equivalent) orally and 4 mg dexamethasone orally given 1-2 h before radiotherapy plus best supportive care (including non-opioid or opioid analgesia, or dexamethasone, or a combination of these) or best supportive care alone. The primary endpoint was improvement in patient-reported liver cancer pain or discomfort of at least 2 points on worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month after randomisation. All patients with both baseline and 1-month assessments were included in the primary endpoint analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511522, and is complete.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Between July 25, 2015, and June 2, 2022, 66 patients were screened and randomly assigned to radiotherapy plus best supportive care (n=33) or best supportive care (n=33). Median age was 65 years (IQR 57-72), 37 (56%) of 66 patients were male, 29 (44%) were female, 43 (65%) had liver metastases, and 23 (35%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (data on race and ethnicity were not collected). As of data cutoff (Sept 8, 2022), median follow-up was 3·2 months (95% CI 3·0-3·4). 24 (73%) of 33 in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group and 18 (55%) of 33 in the best supportive care only group completed baseline and 1-month assessments. An improvement in hepatic pain of at least 2 points in worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month was seen in 16 (67%) of 24 patients in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group versus four (22%) of 18 patients in the best supportive care group (p=0·0042). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events within 1 month after randomisation were abdominal pain (three [9%] of 33 in the radiotherapy group vs one [3%] of 33 in best supportive care group) and ascites (two [6%] vs one [3%]). No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths were observed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation: &lt;/st","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1337-1346"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142154480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ESMO Congress 2024. 2024 年 ESMO 大会。
IF 41.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00527-8
Cheryl Lai
{"title":"ESMO Congress 2024.","authors":"Cheryl Lai","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00527-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00527-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"e474-e475"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medicare drug price negotiations by the US Government. 美国政府进行的医疗保险药品价格谈判。
IF 41.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00459-5
Sharmila Devi
{"title":"Medicare drug price negotiations by the US Government.","authors":"Sharmila Devi","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00459-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00459-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1256"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiation oncology: a call for papers for ESTRO 2025. 放射肿瘤学:ESTRO 2025 征稿启事。
IF 41.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00483-2
David Collingridge, Pierre Blanchard
{"title":"Radiation oncology: a call for papers for ESTRO 2025.","authors":"David Collingridge, Pierre Blanchard","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00483-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00483-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1254-1255"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sequential [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (UpFrontPSMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study. 转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌患者序贯[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617和多西他赛与多西他赛(UpFrontPSMA):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、2期研究。
IF 41.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-15 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00440-6
Arun A Azad, Mathias Bressel, Hsiang Tan, Mark Voskoboynik, Aneta Suder, Andrew J Weickhardt, Alexander Guminski, Roslyn J Francis, Javad Saghebi, Nattakorn Dhiantravan, Anthony M Joshua, Louise Emmett, Lisa Horvath, Declan G Murphy, Edward Hsiao, Bavanthi Balakrishnar, Peter Lin, Andrew Redfern, William Macdonald, Siobhan Ng, Sze-Ting Lee, David A Pattison, David Nadebaum, Ian D Kirkwood, Michael S Hofman
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lutetium-177 [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 improves survival and quality of life in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but whether it confers a benefit in hormone-sensitive disease is unknown. We aimed to evaluate [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 before docetaxel treatment in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>UpFrontPSMA was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done at 11 Australian hospitals. Eligible patients had prostate adenocarcinoma without clinically significant neuroendocrine differentiation or small-cell histology, were aged 18 years or older, had less than 4 weeks on androgen deprivation therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had high-volume PSMA-avid disease on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with no major discordance on 2-[<sup>18</sup>F] fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the experimental treatment ([<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed 6 weeks later by docetaxel) or standard-of-care treatment (docetaxel alone) using computer-based block randomisation with random block sizes, stratified by disease volume by conventional imaging and duration of androgen deprivation therapy at the time of registration. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Patients in the experimental group received two cycles of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7·5 GBq every 6 weeks intravenously, followed 6 weeks later by six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> every 3 weeks intravenously, whereas patients in the standard-of-care treatment group received six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> every 3 weeks intravenously. All patients received continuous androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was undetectable prostate-specific antigen (≤0·2 ng/mL) at 48 weeks, assessed using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04343885.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 5, 2020, and April 18, 2023, 130 patients were randomly assigned, 63 (48%) to [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel and 67 (52%) to docetaxel alone. All patients were male and no race or ethnicity data were collected. Median follow-up was 2·5 years (IQR 1·8-3·0). Four patients in the docetaxel alone group withdrew consent after randomisation and no data beyond screening were collected. An additional four patients were not evaluable for the primary endpoint at 48 weeks (two in each group). 25 (41%) of 61 patients (95% CI 30-54) in the [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group had undetectable PSA at 48 weeks compared with ten (16%) of 61 patients (9-28) in the docetaxel alone group (OR 3·88, 95% CI 1·61-9·38; p=0·0020). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutro
背景:镥-177[177Lu]-前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)-617能提高转移性阉割耐药前列腺癌患者的生存率和生活质量,但它是否对激素敏感性疾病有益尚不清楚。我们的目的是在多西他赛治疗前,评估[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617对新发高容量转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌患者的治疗效果:UpFrontPSMA是一项由研究者发起的多中心、开放标签、随机2期试验,在澳大利亚11家医院进行。符合条件的患者均为前列腺腺癌,无临床上明显的神经内分泌分化或小细胞组织学特征,年龄在18岁或18岁以上,接受雄激素剥夺治疗的时间少于4周,东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态为0-2,[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT显示为高体积PSMA-avid疾病,2-[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖-PET-CT显示无重大差异。患者被随机分配(1:1)到实验治疗([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617,6 周后再接受多西他赛治疗)或标准治疗(仅接受多西他赛治疗),采用基于计算机的分块随机化,分块大小随机,根据常规成像的疾病体积和登记时雄激素剥夺治疗的持续时间进行分层。患者和研究人员均不对治疗分配进行蒙蔽。实验组患者接受两个周期的[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7-5 GBq治疗,每6周静脉注射一次,6周后再接受6个周期的多西他赛75 mg/m2治疗,每3周静脉注射一次,而标准治疗组患者接受6个周期的多西他赛75 mg/m2治疗,每3周静脉注射一次。所有患者均接受持续雄激素剥夺治疗。主要终点是48周时检测不到前列腺特异性抗原(≤0-2 ng/mL),采用改良意向治疗分析法进行评估。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT04343885.研究结果:2020年5月5日至2023年4月18日期间,130名患者被随机分配,其中63人(48%)接受[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617联合多西他赛治疗,67人(52%)接受单用多西他赛治疗。所有患者均为男性,未收集种族或民族数据。中位随访时间为 2-5 年(IQR 1-8-3-0)。单用多西他赛组中有四名患者在随机分组后撤回同意,因此未收集筛选后的数据。另有四名患者在 48 周时无法进行主要终点评估(每组各两名)。在[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617加多西他赛组的61名患者中,有25人(41%)(95% CI 30-54)在48周时检测不到PSA,而在单用多西他赛组的61名患者中,有10人(16%)(9-28)检测不到PSA(OR 3-88,95% CI 1-61-9-38;P=0-0020)。最常见的3级或4级治疗相关不良事件是发热性中性粒细胞减少症([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617联合多西他赛组63例患者中7例[11%]与单用多西他赛组63例患者中6例[10%])和腹泻(63例患者中4例[6%]与无腹泻)。[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617加多西他赛组(无一例与[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617明确相关)和单用多西他赛组分别有16例(25%)患者发生严重不良事件。没有发生与治疗相关的死亡病例:与单用多西他赛相比,[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617联合多西他赛可提高新发高体积转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌患者的抗肿瘤活性,且不会增加毒性反应。我们的数据可能支持[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617在转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌中发挥作用:前列腺癌研究联盟(Movember 基金会和澳大利亚政府医学研究未来基金)、美国国防部影响奖-临床试验、Endocyte/高级加速器应用公司(诺华公司旗下公司)、澳大利亚核科学技术组织、维多利亚癌症机构、墨尔本大学和彼得-麦克卡勒姆癌症基金会。
{"title":"Sequential [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (UpFrontPSMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study.","authors":"Arun A Azad, Mathias Bressel, Hsiang Tan, Mark Voskoboynik, Aneta Suder, Andrew J Weickhardt, Alexander Guminski, Roslyn J Francis, Javad Saghebi, Nattakorn Dhiantravan, Anthony M Joshua, Louise Emmett, Lisa Horvath, Declan G Murphy, Edward Hsiao, Bavanthi Balakrishnar, Peter Lin, Andrew Redfern, William Macdonald, Siobhan Ng, Sze-Ting Lee, David A Pattison, David Nadebaum, Ian D Kirkwood, Michael S Hofman","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00440-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00440-6","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Lutetium-177 [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 improves survival and quality of life in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but whether it confers a benefit in hormone-sensitive disease is unknown. We aimed to evaluate [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 before docetaxel treatment in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;UpFrontPSMA was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done at 11 Australian hospitals. Eligible patients had prostate adenocarcinoma without clinically significant neuroendocrine differentiation or small-cell histology, were aged 18 years or older, had less than 4 weeks on androgen deprivation therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had high-volume PSMA-avid disease on [&lt;sup&gt;68&lt;/sup&gt;Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with no major discordance on 2-[&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F] fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the experimental treatment ([&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed 6 weeks later by docetaxel) or standard-of-care treatment (docetaxel alone) using computer-based block randomisation with random block sizes, stratified by disease volume by conventional imaging and duration of androgen deprivation therapy at the time of registration. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Patients in the experimental group received two cycles of [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7·5 GBq every 6 weeks intravenously, followed 6 weeks later by six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; every 3 weeks intravenously, whereas patients in the standard-of-care treatment group received six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; every 3 weeks intravenously. All patients received continuous androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was undetectable prostate-specific antigen (≤0·2 ng/mL) at 48 weeks, assessed using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04343885.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Between May 5, 2020, and April 18, 2023, 130 patients were randomly assigned, 63 (48%) to [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel and 67 (52%) to docetaxel alone. All patients were male and no race or ethnicity data were collected. Median follow-up was 2·5 years (IQR 1·8-3·0). Four patients in the docetaxel alone group withdrew consent after randomisation and no data beyond screening were collected. An additional four patients were not evaluable for the primary endpoint at 48 weeks (two in each group). 25 (41%) of 61 patients (95% CI 30-54) in the [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group had undetectable PSA at 48 weeks compared with ten (16%) of 61 patients (9-28) in the docetaxel alone group (OR 3·88, 95% CI 1·61-9·38; p=0·0020). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutro","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1267-1276"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment of Richter transformation-immunotherapy to the rescue? 里氏转化的治疗--免疫疗法的拯救?
IF 41.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00485-6
Othman Al-Sawaf, Barbara Eichhorst
{"title":"Treatment of Richter transformation-immunotherapy to the rescue?","authors":"Othman Al-Sawaf, Barbara Eichhorst","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00485-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00485-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1248-1249"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The burden of atrial fibrillation in the Asia–Pacific region 亚太地区心房颤动的负担
IF 41.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-024-01091-1
Christopher X. Wong, Hung Fat Tse, Eue-Kuen Choi, Tze-Fan Chao, Koichi Inoue, Katrina Poppe, Eugene Tan, Yoga Yuniadi, Erdie Fadreguilan, Sofian Johar, Ngai Yin Chan, Narayan Namboodiri, S. Mokaddas Hossain, Huang He, Thoranis Chantrarat, Abdul Raqib Bin Abd Ghani, Narantuya Davaakhuu, Nwe Nwe, Ghazala Irfan, Minh That Ton, Rohan Gunawardena, Prashanthan Sanders
The burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing worldwide; however, most existing data on AF epidemiology are from Western regions. According to our analyses, the estimated absolute prevalence of AF in the Asia–Pacific region in 2023 was approximately 80 million, which is much higher than has been calculated for other global regions.
心房颤动(房颤)的负担在全球范围内日益加重;然而,有关房颤流行病学的现有数据大多来自西方地区。根据我们的分析,估计 2023 年亚太地区心房颤动的绝对发病率约为 8000 万,远高于全球其他地区的计算值。
{"title":"The burden of atrial fibrillation in the Asia–Pacific region","authors":"Christopher X. Wong,&nbsp;Hung Fat Tse,&nbsp;Eue-Kuen Choi,&nbsp;Tze-Fan Chao,&nbsp;Koichi Inoue,&nbsp;Katrina Poppe,&nbsp;Eugene Tan,&nbsp;Yoga Yuniadi,&nbsp;Erdie Fadreguilan,&nbsp;Sofian Johar,&nbsp;Ngai Yin Chan,&nbsp;Narayan Namboodiri,&nbsp;S. Mokaddas Hossain,&nbsp;Huang He,&nbsp;Thoranis Chantrarat,&nbsp;Abdul Raqib Bin Abd Ghani,&nbsp;Narantuya Davaakhuu,&nbsp;Nwe Nwe,&nbsp;Ghazala Irfan,&nbsp;Minh That Ton,&nbsp;Rohan Gunawardena,&nbsp;Prashanthan Sanders","doi":"10.1038/s41569-024-01091-1","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41569-024-01091-1","url":null,"abstract":"The burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing worldwide; however, most existing data on AF epidemiology are from Western regions. According to our analyses, the estimated absolute prevalence of AF in the Asia–Pacific region in 2023 was approximately 80 million, which is much higher than has been calculated for other global regions.","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":"21 12","pages":"841-843"},"PeriodicalIF":41.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142317016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1