China has become increasingly active in the Middle East over the past decade, both economically and politically. Its strategy aims to expand its reach and influence, while warily avoiding the region's chronic instability. The Gulf states and Israel have sought to leverage China's economic growth and global influence to advance their interests. This article explores the strategies of key Gulf countries, Israel, and Iran toward China in their efforts to manage the fast-changing regional dynamics. It first examines their economic ties with Beijing and then discusses their political relations. The analysis also reviews how the intensifying superpower competition between the United States and China is shaping both the region and the foreign policies of its constitutive states. This article is part of a special issue on the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.
过去十年来,中国在中东地区的经济和政治活动日益活跃。中国的战略目标是扩大其覆盖范围和影响力,同时警惕地避免该地区的长期不稳定。海湾国家和以色列试图利用中国的经济增长和全球影响力来促进自身利益。本文探讨了海湾地区主要国家、以色列和伊朗为管理瞬息万变的地区动态而采取的对华战略。文章首先探讨了这些国家与中国的经济关系,然后讨论了它们之间的政治关系。分析还回顾了美国和中国之间愈演愈烈的超级大国竞争是如何影响该地区及其组成国家的外交政策的。本文是由 Andrea Ghiselli、Anoushiravan Ehteshami 和 Enrico Fardella 编辑的 "海湾国家对中美竞争加剧的反应 "特刊的一部分。
{"title":"Between the Superpowers: Gulf States and Israel Navigate the New Mideast Dynamics","authors":"Gedaliah Afterman, Dominika Urhová","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12731","url":null,"abstract":"<p>China has become increasingly active in the Middle East over the past decade, both economically and politically. Its strategy aims to expand its reach and influence, while warily avoiding the region's chronic instability. The Gulf states and Israel have sought to leverage China's economic growth and global influence to advance their interests. This article explores the strategies of key Gulf countries, Israel, and Iran toward China in their efforts to manage the fast-changing regional dynamics. It first examines their economic ties with Beijing and then discusses their political relations. The analysis also reviews how the intensifying superpower competition between the United States and China is shaping both the region and the foreign policies of its constitutive states. This article is part of a special issue on the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.</p>","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"31 1","pages":"133-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12731","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140348852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Since Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in the 1990s, the United States has played the role of security guarantor in the Gulf, and despite prevailing concerns of American retrenchment, it retains a strong military footprint across the region. But China's emergence as a major player in the Gulf—with its geopolitical ambitions, thirst for foreign oil, and attractive offer of business and investment with a “look the other way” policy on human rights—has stoked fears about the eclipse of American power. While the Gulf remains of strategic importance to the US global strategy, Washington's readjustment of its regional goals suggests that it is recalibrating. Drawing on the literature of foreign policy change, this analysis uses three case studies to examine Washington's recalibration toward the Gulf under the Biden presidency: US engagement with the Iran nuclear deal, US defense agreements with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), and US-GCC tech relations, specifically tensions with China over the use of Huawei technology. This article is part of a special issue on the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.
{"title":"Shifting Sands: US Gulf Policy Recalibrates As China's Regional Ambitions Grow","authors":"Rachel Moreland","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12726","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in the 1990s, the United States has played the role of security guarantor in the Gulf, and despite prevailing concerns of American retrenchment, it retains a strong military footprint across the region. But China's emergence as a major player in the Gulf—with its geopolitical ambitions, thirst for foreign oil, and attractive offer of business and investment with a “look the other way” policy on human rights—has stoked fears about the eclipse of American power. While the Gulf remains of strategic importance to the US global strategy, Washington's readjustment of its regional goals suggests that it is recalibrating. Drawing on the literature of foreign policy change, this analysis uses three case studies to examine Washington's recalibration toward the Gulf under the Biden presidency: US engagement with the Iran nuclear deal, US defense agreements with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), and US-GCC tech relations, specifically tensions with China over the use of Huawei technology. This article is part of a special issue on the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.</p>","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"31 1","pages":"149-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12726","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140348841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although East Asia remains the center of the US-China rivalry, other regions are emerging to play key roles. After years of somewhat peaceful coexistence and even a degree of cooperation between Washington and Beijing, the Gulf, with its deep ties to both sides, undoubtedly has become one of them. This new situation creates challenges for all the parties involved, from the two great powers to the regional actors looking for new ways to reposition themselves. This article introduces the contours of the debate taking place among the studies in this special issue, dedicated to the exploration of the Persian Gulf subregion and US-China relations. It first discusses the position of the Gulf as a barometer of the evolving global power dynamics. The focus then shifts to outlining the implications of the end of American unipolarity for Beijing's and Washington's West Asia policies. Finally, it explores the challenges and opportunities of this systemic shift for the Gulf states. The article is part of a special issue examining the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.
尽管东亚仍是中美竞争的中心,但其他地区也在崭露头角,扮演着重要角色。华盛顿和北京在多年的和平共处甚至一定程度的合作之后,与双方都有着深厚关系的海湾地区无疑成为了其中之一。这一新形势给所有相关各方带来了挑战,从两个大国到寻求新途径重新定位的地区行为体。本特刊致力于探讨波斯湾次区域和中美关系,本文将介绍本特刊各项研究之间的辩论轮廓。文章首先讨论了波斯湾作为不断演变的全球权力动态晴雨表的地位。然后,重点转向概述美国单极化终结对北京和华盛顿西亚政策的影响。最后,文章探讨了这一系统性转变给海湾国家带来的挑战和机遇。这篇文章是由 Andrea Ghiselli、Anoushiravan Ehteshami 和 Enrico Fardella 编辑的特刊的一部分,该特刊探讨了海湾国家对日益加剧的中美竞争的回应。
{"title":"The Persian Gulf's Transition From American Unipolarity","authors":"Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12725","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12725","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although East Asia remains the center of the US-China rivalry, other regions are emerging to play key roles. After years of somewhat peaceful coexistence and even a degree of cooperation between Washington and Beijing, the Gulf, with its deep ties to both sides, undoubtedly has become one of them. This new situation creates challenges for all the parties involved, from the two great powers to the regional actors looking for new ways to reposition themselves. This article introduces the contours of the debate taking place among the studies in this special issue, dedicated to the exploration of the Persian Gulf subregion and US-China relations. It first discusses the position of the Gulf as a barometer of the evolving global power dynamics. The focus then shifts to outlining the implications of the end of American unipolarity for Beijing's and Washington's West Asia policies. Finally, it explores the challenges and opportunities of this systemic shift for the Gulf states. The article is part of a special issue examining the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.</p>","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"31 1","pages":"19-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12725","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140348842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Lives Between the Lines: A Journey in Search of the Lost Levant By Michael Vatikiotis. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2022. 304 pages. $17.99, paper.","authors":"Patrick N. Theros","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12729","DOIUrl":"10.1111/mepo.12729","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"31 1","pages":"170-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12729","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139959924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Arc of a Covenant: The United States, Israel, and the Fate of the Jewish People By Walter Russell Mead. Knopf, 2022. 672 pages. $35, hardcover. We Are Not One: A History of America's Fight Over Israel By Eric Alterman. Basic Books, 2022. 512 pages. $35, hardcover.","authors":"Michael Rubner","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12728","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12728","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"31 1","pages":"162-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12728","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140348844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The dynamics of the relationship between the United States and China have been shifting. This has prompted changes in strategic calculus and policy adoption by the friends and foes of each side. Iran, given its decades-long links with China, has made several. First, it has deepened its ties with the Asian power beyond collaboration in business and trade. Second, it has revised its policies in the Gulf region to be a part of what it sees as China's network of influence, hoping to better position itself in a multilateral global order. Third, it has been seeking opportunities to project power through showing off its military capabilities in Ukraine. This article examines these strategic responses and concludes that Iran has been pursuing an agenda in line with the world vision of its senior leaders. The end goal for Tehran is to gain more power and relevance in the global strategic calculus. This analysis is part of a special issue examining the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.
中美关系的态势一直在变化。这促使双方的朋友和敌人在战略计算和政策采取上都发生了变化。伊朗与中国有着数十年的联系,因此做出了几项改变。首先,伊朗加深了与这个亚洲大国的关系,而不仅仅是商业和贸易合作。其次,伊朗修改了其在海湾地区的政策,使之成为其所认为的中国影响力网络的一部分,希望在多边全球秩序中更好地定位自己。第三,它一直在寻找机会,通过在乌克兰炫耀其军事能力来投射力量。本文对这些战略对策进行了研究,并得出结论:伊朗一直在追求与其高级领导人的世界观相一致的议程。德黑兰的最终目标是在全球战略计算中获得更多权力和相关性。本分析报告是由 Andrea Ghiselli、Anoushiravan Ehteshami 和 Enrico Fardella 编辑的海湾国家应对中美竞争特刊的一部分。
{"title":"Iran's Strategies in Response To Changes in US-China Relations","authors":"Sara Bazoobandi","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12727","DOIUrl":"10.1111/mepo.12727","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The dynamics of the relationship between the United States and China have been shifting. This has prompted changes in strategic calculus and policy adoption by the friends and foes of each side. Iran, given its decades-long links with China, has made several. First, it has deepened its ties with the Asian power beyond collaboration in business and trade. Second, it has revised its policies in the Gulf region to be a part of what it sees as China's network of influence, hoping to better position itself in a multilateral global order. Third, it has been seeking opportunities to project power through showing off its military capabilities in Ukraine. This article examines these strategic responses and concludes that Iran has been pursuing an agenda in line with the world vision of its senior leaders. The end goal for Tehran is to gain more power and relevance in the global strategic calculus. This analysis is part of a special issue examining the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.</p>","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"31 1","pages":"120-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12727","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139838109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
With its thriving economy, well-crafted policies, diverse and lively multicultural society, and advanced infrastructure, the United Arab Emirates plays a significant role in the Middle East. It has become strategically and economically important to both the United States and China, and both countries have established strong strategic partnerships with the Gulf state. As the UAE is a small yet ambitious state, both powers are crucial to its strategy for maintaining security and diversifying its economy. Thus, to secure its interests, the UAE has adopted a strategy of balancing its relationships with Washington and Beijing. This article examines the strategy and aims to predict its direction in light of the increasing competition and rivalry between the two global powers. The analysis is part of a special issue examining the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.
阿拉伯联合酋长国拥有繁荣的经济、精心制定的政策、多样化和生动活泼的多元文化社会以及先进的基础设施,在中东地区发挥着重要作用。对于美国和中国来说,阿联酋在战略和经济上都具有重要意义,两国都与这个海湾国家建立了牢固的战略伙伴关系。由于阿联酋是一个雄心勃勃的小国,这两个大国对其维护安全和实现经济多样化的战略至关重要。因此,为了确保自身利益,阿联酋采取了平衡与华盛顿和北京关系的战略。本文对这一战略进行了研究,旨在根据这两个全球大国之间日益激烈的竞争和对抗预测其发展方向。该分析是由 Andrea Ghiselli、Anoushiravan Ehteshami 和 Enrico Fardella 编辑的海湾国家应对中美竞争特刊的一部分。
{"title":"UAE's Balancing Strategy Between the United States and China","authors":"Mohamed Bin Huwaidin","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12724","DOIUrl":"10.1111/mepo.12724","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With its thriving economy, well-crafted policies, diverse and lively multicultural society, and advanced infrastructure, the United Arab Emirates plays a significant role in the Middle East. It has become strategically and economically important to both the United States and China, and both countries have established strong strategic partnerships with the Gulf state. As the UAE is a small yet ambitious state, both powers are crucial to its strategy for maintaining security and diversifying its economy. Thus, to secure its interests, the UAE has adopted a strategy of balancing its relationships with Washington and Beijing. This article examines the strategy and aims to predict its direction in light of the increasing competition and rivalry between the two global powers. The analysis is part of a special issue examining the responses of Gulf countries to rising Sino-American competition, edited by Andrea Ghiselli, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Enrico Fardella.</p>","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"31 1","pages":"88-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12724","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139601027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay contextualizes the 2023 Israel-Hamas war within a century-old legal history of Palestinian dispossession that has been facilitated through the violation and misuse of international law. It argues that Hamas's attacks of October 7 were not simply driven by sanguinary hatred of Jews, as some commentators have suggested. Instead, the war crimes were motivated by the Palestinians’ disillusionment with an international system that has consistently denied them their right to self-determination. This has been exacerbated by Israel's criminalization of nonviolent resistance. Such historical perspective illuminates the underlying causes not just of the present war but of the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
{"title":"The Israel-Hamas War: Historical Context and International Law","authors":"M.T. Samuel","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12723","DOIUrl":"10.1111/mepo.12723","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay contextualizes the 2023 Israel-Hamas war within a century-old legal history of Palestinian dispossession that has been facilitated through the violation and misuse of international law. It argues that Hamas's attacks of October 7 were not simply driven by sanguinary hatred of Jews, as some commentators have suggested. Instead, the war crimes were motivated by the Palestinians’ disillusionment with an international system that has consistently denied them their right to self-determination. This has been exacerbated by Israel's criminalization of nonviolent resistance. Such historical perspective illuminates the underlying causes not just of the present war but of the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"30 4","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12723","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138590645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay argues that the recent protests in Iran, ostensibly driven by the Woman, Life, Freedom movement, are a symbol of a far greater dissatisfaction with arbitrary rule, corruption, and incompetence. While compulsory veiling was the immediate cause, the main drivers are the ailing economy and the decline in public services. Given the depth and breadth of street protests and the ongoing civil disobedience, the Islamic Republic simply cannot return to business as usual. At the same time, the regime is incapable of reinventing itself. It faces political and socioeconomic constraints and a mix of demographic and environmental challenges, among others. As for whether outside pressure can help protesters, the West must balance its championing of the movement with its pursuit of diplomatic engagement on Iran's nuclear program. And Iran is now getting more international assistance by looking eastward to China and Russia. With the government and security forces willing to use violence against protesters, civil disobedience may be the only method to systematically challenge the ruling order.
{"title":"Woman, Life, Freedom, One Year Later: Will the Iran Protests Succeed?","authors":"Mahmood Monshipouri, Ramtin Zamiri","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12722","DOIUrl":"10.1111/mepo.12722","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay argues that the recent protests in Iran, ostensibly driven by the Woman, Life, Freedom movement, are a symbol of a far greater dissatisfaction with arbitrary rule, corruption, and incompetence. While compulsory veiling was the immediate cause, the main drivers are the ailing economy and the decline in public services. Given the depth and breadth of street protests and the ongoing civil disobedience, the Islamic Republic simply cannot return to business as usual. At the same time, the regime is incapable of reinventing itself. It faces political and socioeconomic constraints and a mix of demographic and environmental challenges, among others. As for whether outside pressure can help protesters, the West must balance its championing of the movement with its pursuit of diplomatic engagement on Iran's nuclear program. And Iran is now getting more international assistance by looking eastward to China and Russia. With the government and security forces willing to use violence against protesters, civil disobedience may be the only method to systematically challenge the ruling order.</p>","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"30 4","pages":"10-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138591564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The 9/11 attacks prompted the development of an international nuclear security regime. States are expected to adopt legislation and institutionalize measures to ensure cooperation among stakeholders and create their own national nuclear security regimes. This article evaluates the steps taken by Turkey, a newcomer in nuclear energy. It argues that while Ankara has acted in line with its traditional conception of security, this is not enough. The inadequate cooperation and coordination among stakeholders, and the insufficient development of a security culture specifically oriented to nuclear energy, leave the country vulnerable. The analysis explains the vulnerabilities and incomplete tasks, and proposes actions necessary for Turkey to create a sound national nuclear security regime.
{"title":"Turkey's Nuclear Security Regime: An Assessment","authors":"Şebnem Udum","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12716","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 9/11 attacks prompted the development of an international nuclear security regime. States are expected to adopt legislation and institutionalize measures to ensure cooperation among stakeholders and create their own national nuclear security regimes. This article evaluates the steps taken by Turkey, a newcomer in nuclear energy. It argues that while Ankara has acted in line with its traditional conception of security, this is not enough. The inadequate cooperation and coordination among stakeholders, and the insufficient development of a security culture specifically oriented to nuclear energy, leave the country vulnerable. The analysis explains the vulnerabilities and incomplete tasks, and proposes actions necessary for Turkey to create a sound national nuclear security regime.</p>","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"30 4","pages":"122-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139047502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}