首页 > 最新文献

Burns最新文献

英文 中文
Spanish translation, cultural, and content validation of the Mouth Impairment and Disability Assessment in a prospective, longitudinal evaluation of pediatric patients with facial burn injuries 口腔损伤和残疾评估的西班牙语翻译、文化和内容验证在一项前瞻性、纵向评估儿科面部烧伤患者
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107775
Bernadette Nedelec , Ingrid Parry , Clarissa Ochoa , David G. Greenhalgh , Zoë Edger-Lacoursière , Jakub Sawicki
The Mouth Impairment and Disability Assessment (MIDA) was developed to provide clinicians with an outcome measure that thoroughly and objectively evaluates the impairment and disabilities associated with burn injuries of the face involving the mouth. However, thus far, it is only available in English and French-Canadian and has not been used with pediatric burn survivors. Additionally, there is limited longitudinal outcome data describing the recovery trajectory associated with burn injuries of the mouth. Thus, the purpose of this study was to translate the MIDA into Spanish, validate the content with the pediatric burn survivor population who have sustained a burn injury involving their mouth, and prospectively collect data to document the recovery profile and examine the psychometric properties.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational case series of pediatric burn survivors. Prior to commencing patient recruitment, a forward-backward translation and cultural adaptation process was undertaken to create a Spanish version of the MIDA. English- and Spanish-speaking pediatric burn survivors who met the inclusion criteria and had signed the informed consent were evaluated using the MIDA at approximately one month, three months, six months, and 12 months post-burn. Individual and subscale summary data from the MIDA are reported. Construct validity was assessed by examining the correlations between MIDA subscale scores at baseline and measures of vertical and horizontal mouth opening.

Results

Sixteen predominantly Hispanic (75 %) pediatric burn survivors were evaluated approximately one-month post-burn, eleven were evaluated at three and six months, and nine at twelve months. The majority were male (62.5 %) with a mean age of 10.4 years old and mean total body surface area burn of 33.3 %. The median number of surgeries was two, with a median of one involving the face, mouth, or neck. Content validity was confirmed through cognitive debriefing and self-reported difficulties with all items within the measure at various points across time. The recovery profile varied across time, with many reporting a reduction in function between one and three months, most reporting an improvement by six or twelve months, but some continuing to experience extreme difficulty or dissatisfaction at twelve months.

Discussion

The Spanish version of the MIDA can now be used with the burn survivor population to evaluate the outcome of face and neck burns that may result in mouth impairment and disability. In addition, it proved to be a valid measure for quantifying the challenges that arise for pediatric burn survivors. There is a need for future research to investigate which treatment interventions optimize long-term outcomes.
口腔损伤和残疾评估(MIDA)旨在为临床医生提供一种全面客观地评估面部涉及口腔的烧伤相关损伤和残疾的结果测量。然而,到目前为止,它只适用于英语和法裔加拿大人,并没有用于儿科烧伤幸存者。此外,描述与口腔烧伤相关的恢复轨迹的纵向结果数据有限。因此,本研究的目的是将MIDA翻译成西班牙语,在口腔烧伤的儿童烧伤幸存者人群中验证其内容,并前瞻性地收集数据以记录恢复情况并检查心理测量学特性。方法:对儿童烧伤幸存者进行前瞻性观察性研究。在开始患者招募之前,进行了向前向后翻译和文化适应过程,以创建西班牙语版本的MIDA。符合纳入标准并签署知情同意书的英语和西班牙语儿童烧伤幸存者在烧伤后约1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月使用MIDA进行评估。报告了MIDA的个人和次尺度汇总数据。建构效度是通过检验基线MIDA分量表得分与垂直和水平开口测量之间的相关性来评估的。结果16名主要为西班牙裔(75% %)的儿童烧伤幸存者在烧伤后约1个月接受评估,11名在烧伤后3个月和6个月接受评估,9名在烧伤后12个月接受评估。男性居多(62.5 %),平均年龄10.4岁,平均体表面积烧伤33.3% %。手术次数的中位数为2次,其中涉及面部、口腔或颈部的中位数为1次。内容效度通过认知汇报和自我报告在不同时间点对测量中所有项目的困难来确认。随着时间的推移,恢复情况有所不同,许多人报告在一到三个月内功能下降,大多数人报告在6到12个月内有所改善,但有些人在12个月内继续经历极端困难或不满。西班牙语版本的MIDA现在可以用于烧伤幸存者人群,以评估面部和颈部烧伤可能导致口腔损伤和残疾的结果。此外,它被证明是量化儿科烧伤幸存者面临的挑战的有效措施。有必要进一步研究哪种治疗干预措施能优化长期结果。
{"title":"Spanish translation, cultural, and content validation of the Mouth Impairment and Disability Assessment in a prospective, longitudinal evaluation of pediatric patients with facial burn injuries","authors":"Bernadette Nedelec ,&nbsp;Ingrid Parry ,&nbsp;Clarissa Ochoa ,&nbsp;David G. Greenhalgh ,&nbsp;Zoë Edger-Lacoursière ,&nbsp;Jakub Sawicki","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107775","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107775","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Mouth Impairment and Disability Assessment (MIDA) was developed to provide clinicians with an outcome measure that thoroughly and objectively evaluates the impairment and disabilities associated with burn injuries of the face involving the mouth. However, thus far, it is only available in English and French-Canadian and has not been used with pediatric burn survivors. Additionally, there is limited longitudinal outcome data describing the recovery trajectory associated with burn injuries of the mouth. Thus, the purpose of this study was to translate the MIDA into Spanish, validate the content with the pediatric burn survivor population who have sustained a burn injury involving their mouth, and prospectively collect data to document the recovery profile and examine the psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective, observational case series of pediatric burn survivors. Prior to commencing patient recruitment, a forward-backward translation and cultural adaptation process was undertaken to create a Spanish version of the MIDA. English- and Spanish-speaking pediatric burn survivors who met the inclusion criteria and had signed the informed consent were evaluated using the MIDA at approximately one month, three months, six months, and 12 months post-burn. Individual and subscale summary data from the MIDA are reported. Construct validity was assessed by examining the correlations between MIDA subscale scores at baseline and measures of vertical and horizontal mouth opening.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen predominantly Hispanic (75 %) pediatric burn survivors were evaluated approximately one-month post-burn, eleven were evaluated at three and six months, and nine at twelve months. The majority were male (62.5 %) with a mean age of 10.4 years old and mean total body surface area burn of 33.3 %. The median number of surgeries was two, with a median of one involving the face, mouth, or neck. Content validity was confirmed through cognitive debriefing and self-reported difficulties with all items within the measure at various points across time. The recovery profile varied across time, with many reporting a reduction in function between one and three months, most reporting an improvement by six or twelve months, but some continuing to experience extreme difficulty or dissatisfaction at twelve months.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The Spanish version of the MIDA can now be used with the burn survivor population to evaluate the outcome of face and neck burns that may result in mouth impairment and disability. In addition, it proved to be a valid measure for quantifying the challenges that arise for pediatric burn survivors. There is a need for future research to investigate which treatment interventions optimize long-term outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discriminative power of organ-specific SOFA assessment in burn sepsis: A temporal biomarker analysis 烧伤败血症中器官特异性SOFA评估的鉴别能力:一种时间生物标志物分析
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107771
Hang Su , Bo Yuan , Yan Liu , Wenjing Xi , Liang Qiao

Background

Severe burn patients face diagnostic challenges in distinguishing sepsis from systemic inflammation using Sepsis-3 criteria. Current Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) validation studies focus on composite scores, neglecting subsystem-level analysis in burn-specific pathophysiology.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 55 severe burn patients (TBSA>30 %) from a Chinese burn center (2021–2022), comparing 19 sepsis cases with 36 controls. We analyzed SOFA subsystems and biomarkers (creatinine, platelet count, NT-proBNP, and PCT) during both the early phase (days 1 and 3 post-burn) and the late phase (after day 3 post-burn), performed TBSA-adjusted logistic regression, and constructed a nomogram.

Results

Cardiovascular (84.2 % vs 2.8 %, p < 0.001), renal (31.6 % vs 0 %, p < 0.001), and coagulation (42.1 % vs 5.6 %, p < 0.001) subsystems showed superior diagnostic specificity. Platelet trajectories revealed critical divergence at day 3 (septic: 66 vs control: 120 ×10⁹/L, p < 0.001), while creatinine elevation persisted across phases (day 1: 100 vs 62 μmol/L, p < 0.001, day 3: 84 vs 65 μmol/L, and late phase: 118 vs 58μmol/L, p < 0.001). PCT demonstrated isolated diagnostic utility confined to the late phase (6.12 vs 0.55 μg/L, p < 0.001). Day 3 platelet count, late-phase creatinine, and PCT were incorporated into the nomogram, which achieved an AUC of 0.930 in ROC analysis.

Conclusion

Subsystem-specific SOFA analysis identifies creatinine elevation and thrombocytopenia as key sepsis indicators in burns. Serial platelet and creatinine monitoring from day 3 post-injury enhances early detection, while PCT demonstrates diagnostic utility only in the late phase. A clinically applicable nomogram was developed to predict sepsis risk. These findings suggest that these specific organ systems are the principal contributors to the SOFA score in burn-related sepsis.
重度烧伤患者在使用脓毒症-3标准区分脓毒症和全身性炎症方面面临诊断挑战。目前的顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)验证研究侧重于综合评分,忽视了烧伤特异性病理生理学的子系统水平分析。方法回顾性队列研究分析了中国烧伤中心(2021-2022)55例严重烧伤患者(tbsa30 %),比较了19例败血症患者和36例对照组。我们分析了SOFA子系统和生物标志物(肌酐、血小板计数、NT-proBNP和PCT)在烧伤早期(烧伤后第1天和第3天)和晚期(烧伤后第3天),进行了tbsa调整的逻辑回归,并构建了nomogram。ResultsCardiovascular (84.2 vs 2.8  % % p & lt; 0.001)、肾(31.6 vs 0  % % p & lt; 0.001),和凝固(42.1 vs 5.6  % % p & lt; 0.001)子系统显示优越的诊断特异性。血小板轨迹在第3天显示出临界差异(脓毒症:66 vs对照组:120 ×10⁹/L, p <; 0.001),而肌酐升高在各个阶段持续存在(第1天:100 vs 62 μmol/L, p <; 0.001,第3天:84 vs 65 μmol/L,晚期:118 vs 58μmol/L, p <; 0.001)。PCT表现出局限于晚期的孤立诊断效用(6.12 vs 0.55 μg/L, p <; 0.001)。将第3天血小板计数、晚期肌酐、PCT纳入nomogram, ROC分析AUC为0.930。结论系统特异性SOFA分析确定肌酐升高和血小板减少是烧伤脓毒症的关键指标。损伤后第3天的连续血小板和肌酐监测有助于早期发现,而PCT仅在晚期诊断有用。开发了一种临床适用的nomogram预测脓毒症风险。这些发现表明,这些特定的器官系统是烧伤相关败血症SOFA评分的主要贡献者。
{"title":"Discriminative power of organ-specific SOFA assessment in burn sepsis: A temporal biomarker analysis","authors":"Hang Su ,&nbsp;Bo Yuan ,&nbsp;Yan Liu ,&nbsp;Wenjing Xi ,&nbsp;Liang Qiao","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107771","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107771","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Severe burn patients face diagnostic challenges in distinguishing sepsis from systemic inflammation using Sepsis-3 criteria. Current Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) validation studies focus on composite scores, neglecting subsystem-level analysis in burn-specific pathophysiology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 55 severe burn patients (TBSA&gt;30 %) from a Chinese burn center (2021–2022), comparing 19 sepsis cases with 36 controls. We analyzed SOFA subsystems and biomarkers (creatinine, platelet count, NT-proBNP, and PCT) during both the early phase (days 1 and 3 post-burn) and the late phase (after day 3 post-burn), performed TBSA-adjusted logistic regression, and constructed a nomogram.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cardiovascular (84.2 % vs 2.8 %, p &lt; 0.001), renal (31.6 % vs 0 %, p &lt; 0.001), and coagulation (42.1 % vs 5.6 %, p &lt; 0.001) subsystems showed superior diagnostic specificity. Platelet trajectories revealed critical divergence at day 3 (septic: 66 vs control: 120 ×10⁹/L, p &lt; 0.001), while creatinine elevation persisted across phases (day 1: 100 vs 62 μmol/L, p &lt; 0.001, day 3: 84 vs 65 μmol/L, and late phase: 118 vs 58μmol/L, p &lt; 0.001). PCT demonstrated isolated diagnostic utility confined to the late phase (6.12 vs 0.55 μg/L, p &lt; 0.001). Day 3 platelet count, late-phase creatinine, and PCT were incorporated into the nomogram, which achieved an AUC of 0.930 in ROC analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Subsystem-specific SOFA analysis identifies creatinine elevation and thrombocytopenia as key sepsis indicators in burns. Serial platelet and creatinine monitoring from day 3 post-injury enhances early detection, while PCT demonstrates diagnostic utility only in the late phase. A clinically applicable nomogram was developed to predict sepsis risk. These findings suggest that these specific organ systems are the principal contributors to the SOFA score in burn-related sepsis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comments on: "Admission lymphopenia predicts risk of pneumonia and AKI in hospitalized burn injuries" 评论:“入院时淋巴细胞减少可预测住院烧伤患者肺炎和AKI的风险”
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107806
Min Zhang , Xingyi Yang
{"title":"Comments on: \"Admission lymphopenia predicts risk of pneumonia and AKI in hospitalized burn injuries\"","authors":"Min Zhang ,&nbsp;Xingyi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107806","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107806","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145614204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can we predict mortality, length of stay, and time taken to heal at the point of admission in burn patients? 我们能否预测死亡率、住院时间和入院时烧伤患者的愈合时间?
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107779
Olivia Antoinette Smith , Ascanio Tridente , Sankhya Kapil Sen

Background

Burn injuries may be complex, life-changing and life-threatening. Knowing the factors that contribute to unfavourable outcomes, particularly mortality, is crucial so that they can be assessed and addressed. Well-recognised contributors to adverse outcomes in burn patients include age, burn size, revised Baux score, and inhalation injury. Less well described, but increasingly reported, is frailty status. Here we aim to expand the current literature by adjusting for confounders not previously investigated. This is important particularly with an increasing emphasis on frailty assessment in acute care.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of adult burn patients who required admission was conducted at a single burns unit in the United Kingdom from 2019 to 2024. The Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used to assess an individual’s frailty on a scale of 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill). Univariate and multi-variate linear and logistic regression analyses assessed associations between various predictors, including revised Baux score and frailty (as a potential prognostic factor), and hospital mortality, length of stay, and time taken to heal.

Results

Our study included 1451 adult patients. Adjusting for age, sex, burn size, inhalation injury, and revised Baux score, frailty was significantly associated with increased mortality (OR 3, CI 1.84 – 4.88, p < 0.001), length of hospital stay (LOS, b 2.03, 95 % CI 1.27 – 2.78, p < 0.001), and time taken to heal (b 4.5, 95 % CI 1.75 – 7.3, p = 0.001). Other significant predictors of mortality were %TBSA (OR per % increase 1.06, 95 % CI 1.03–1.1, p < 0.001) and revised Baux (OR per 1 point increase 1.06, 95 % CI 1.03 – 1.1, p = 0.001). Burn %TBSA was also predictive of LOS (β per 1 % increase 0.35, 95 % CI 0.24 – 0.47, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that 1) age, %TBSA, revised Baux score, and frailty are independently associated with mortality in burn injured patients; 2) frailty score and the % TBSA are independent predictors of increased length of hospital stay; and 3) frailty is an independent predictor of prolonged burn wound healing time. Further validation in more severe burn cohorts and multi-centre populations is needed before strong clinical recommendations can be made.
背景:烧伤可能是复杂的,改变生活和危及生命的。了解导致不利结果的因素,特别是死亡率,至关重要,这样才能对这些因素进行评估和处理。烧伤患者不良结局的公认影响因素包括年龄、烧伤面积、修订后的Baux评分和吸入性损伤。虽然描述得不太好,但越来越多的报道是虚弱的状态。在这里,我们的目标是通过调整以前没有研究过的混杂因素来扩展当前的文献。这是非常重要的,特别是在日益强调脆弱评估在急性护理。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2024年在英国一家烧伤科收治的成人烧伤患者。Rockwood临床虚弱量表(CFS)用于评估个体的虚弱程度,范围从1(非常健康)到9(身患绝症)。单变量和多变量线性和逻辑回归分析评估了各种预测因素之间的关联,包括修订Baux评分和虚弱(作为潜在的预后因素)、住院死亡率、住院时间和愈合时间。结果:本研究纳入1451例成人患者。调整年龄、性别、烧伤大小、吸入性损伤和修订后的Baux评分后,虚弱与死亡率增加显著相关(OR 3, CI 1.84 - 4.88, p )结论:我们的研究结果表明:1)年龄、TBSA %、修订后的Baux评分和虚弱与烧伤患者的死亡率独立相关;2)虚弱评分和TBSA %是住院时间增加的独立预测因子;3)虚弱是延长烧伤创面愈合时间的独立预测因子。在提出强有力的临床建议之前,需要在更严重的烧伤队列和多中心人群中进行进一步的验证。
{"title":"Can we predict mortality, length of stay, and time taken to heal at the point of admission in burn patients?","authors":"Olivia Antoinette Smith ,&nbsp;Ascanio Tridente ,&nbsp;Sankhya Kapil Sen","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107779","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107779","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Burn injuries may be complex, life-changing and life-threatening. Knowing the factors that contribute to unfavourable outcomes, particularly mortality, is crucial so that they can be assessed and addressed. Well-recognised contributors to adverse outcomes in burn patients include age, burn size, revised Baux score, and inhalation injury. Less well described, but increasingly reported, is frailty status. Here we aim to expand the current literature by adjusting for confounders not previously investigated. This is important particularly with an increasing emphasis on frailty assessment in acute care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of adult burn patients who required admission was conducted at a single burns unit in the United Kingdom from 2019 to 2024. The Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used to assess an individual’s frailty on a scale of 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill). Univariate and multi-variate linear and logistic regression analyses assessed associations between various predictors, including revised Baux score and frailty (as a potential prognostic factor), and hospital mortality, length of stay, and time taken to heal.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study included 1451 adult patients. Adjusting for age, sex, burn size, inhalation injury, and revised Baux score, frailty was significantly associated with increased mortality (OR 3, CI 1.84 – 4.88, p &lt; 0.001), length of hospital stay (LOS, <em>b</em> 2.03, 95 % CI 1.27 – 2.78, p &lt; 0.001), and time taken to heal (<em>b</em> 4.5, 95 % CI 1.75 – 7.3, p = 0.001). Other significant predictors of mortality were %TBSA (OR per % increase 1.06, 95 % CI 1.03–1.1, p &lt; 0.001) and revised Baux (OR per 1 point increase 1.06, 95 % CI 1.03 – 1.1, p = 0.001). Burn %TBSA was also predictive of LOS (β per 1 % increase 0.35, 95 % CI 0.24 – 0.47, p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that 1) age, %TBSA, revised Baux score, and frailty are independently associated with mortality in burn injured patients; 2) frailty score and the % TBSA are independent predictors of increased length of hospital stay; and 3) frailty is an independent predictor of prolonged burn wound healing time. Further validation in more severe burn cohorts and multi-centre populations is needed before strong clinical recommendations can be made.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comments on: "Burn injury in obesity: Examination of the Burn Care Quality Platform’s (BCQP) available data on obese patients to determine burn-related outcomes" 评论:“肥胖烧伤:检查烧伤护理质量平台(BCQP)对肥胖患者的可用数据,以确定烧伤相关结局”
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107801
Mahta Moghaddam Ahmadi, Moein Moghaddam Ahmadi
{"title":"Comments on: \"Burn injury in obesity: Examination of the Burn Care Quality Platform’s (BCQP) available data on obese patients to determine burn-related outcomes\"","authors":"Mahta Moghaddam Ahmadi,&nbsp;Moein Moghaddam Ahmadi","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107801","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107801","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The burn repair molecule? Evaluating FGF-21 in thermal injury – A systematic review 烧伤修复分子?评价FGF-21在热损伤中的作用——一项系统综述
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107785
Tobias Niederegger , Thomas Schaschinger , Jule Brandt , Leonard Knoedler , Samuel Knoedler , Alen Palackic , Felix J. Klimitz , Dorothea Noll , Patrick Most , Julia Ritterhoff , Adriana C. Panayi , Gabriel Hundeshagen
Severe burns induce a hypermetabolic and inflammatory state, impairing wound healing and contributing to long-term morbidity. Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21), a metabolic hormone regulating lipid oxidation, glucose uptake, and mitochondrial homeostasis, has emerged as a potential biomarker and therapeutic modulator in critical illness.
This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and assessed seven studies (2015–2024) published until April 2025. Clinical, in vivo, and in vitro investigations were included. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Level of Evidence, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the SYRCLE Risk of Bias tool.
In our study, FGF-21 was commonly upregulated following burn injury and was associated with hypermetabolism, adipose tissue browning, mitochondrial stress, and systemic inflammation. Nutritional interventions, including hydrolyzed collagen and omega-3 fatty acids, reduced FGF-21 levels, improved wound healing, and attenuated inflammatory responses. Preclinical models demonstrated that administration of exogenous FGF-21 enhanced re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, mitochondrial function, and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways. Conversely, chronically elevated endogenous FGF-21 levels were consistently linked to metabolic exhaustion, liver dysfunction, and impaired recovery.
Overall, FGF-21 may be a promising diagnostic and therapeutic target in burn care. Its clinical relevance and long-term effects require further investigation for successful integration into clinical practice.
严重烧伤引起高代谢和炎症状态,损害伤口愈合并导致长期发病率。成纤维细胞生长因子21 (FGF-21)是一种调节脂质氧化、葡萄糖摄取和线粒体稳态的代谢激素,已成为危重疾病的潜在生物标志物和治疗调节剂。本系统综述遵循PRISMA 2020指南,评估了截至2025年4月发表的7项研究(2015-2024)。包括临床、体内和体外研究。采用证据水平、纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和sycle偏倚风险工具对方法学质量进行评估。在我们的研究中,FGF-21通常在烧伤后上调,并与高代谢、脂肪组织褐变、线粒体应激和全身性炎症有关。营养干预,包括水解胶原蛋白和omega-3脂肪酸,降低FGF-21水平,改善伤口愈合,减轻炎症反应。临床前模型显示,外源性FGF-21可增强再上皮化、血管生成、线粒体功能和抗炎信号通路。相反,长期升高的内源性FGF-21水平始终与代谢衰竭、肝功能障碍和恢复受损有关。总之,FGF-21可能是一个很有前途的烧伤诊断和治疗靶点。它的临床相关性和长期效果需要进一步研究才能成功地融入临床实践。
{"title":"The burn repair molecule? Evaluating FGF-21 in thermal injury – A systematic review","authors":"Tobias Niederegger ,&nbsp;Thomas Schaschinger ,&nbsp;Jule Brandt ,&nbsp;Leonard Knoedler ,&nbsp;Samuel Knoedler ,&nbsp;Alen Palackic ,&nbsp;Felix J. Klimitz ,&nbsp;Dorothea Noll ,&nbsp;Patrick Most ,&nbsp;Julia Ritterhoff ,&nbsp;Adriana C. Panayi ,&nbsp;Gabriel Hundeshagen","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107785","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107785","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Severe burns induce a hypermetabolic and inflammatory state, impairing wound healing and contributing to long-term morbidity. Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21), a metabolic hormone regulating lipid oxidation, glucose uptake, and mitochondrial homeostasis, has emerged as a potential biomarker and therapeutic modulator in critical illness.</div><div>This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and assessed seven studies (2015–2024) published until April 2025. Clinical, in vivo, and in vitro investigations were included. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Level of Evidence, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the SYRCLE Risk of Bias tool.</div><div>In our study, FGF-21 was commonly upregulated following burn injury and was associated with hypermetabolism, adipose tissue browning, mitochondrial stress, and systemic inflammation. Nutritional interventions, including hydrolyzed collagen and omega-3 fatty acids, reduced FGF-21 levels, improved wound healing, and attenuated inflammatory responses. Preclinical models demonstrated that administration of exogenous FGF-21 enhanced re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, mitochondrial function, and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways. Conversely, chronically elevated endogenous FGF-21 levels were consistently linked to metabolic exhaustion, liver dysfunction, and impaired recovery.</div><div>Overall, FGF-21 may be a promising diagnostic and therapeutic target in burn care. Its clinical relevance and long-term effects require further investigation for successful integration into clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancements in burn size assessment: A systematic review of emerging technologies 烧伤大小评估的进展:对新兴技术的系统回顾
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107782
Amy Woods , Poh Tan, Tamara Mertz, Christopher J. Lewis

Background

Accurate and reproducible assessment of total body surface area (TBSA) in burns is vital for guiding fluid resuscitation, triage, referral decisions, and overall clinical management. Traditional methods are widely used but prone to significant inter-rater variability and diagnostic inaccuracies.

Objective

This systematic review evaluates emerging technologies developed to improve TBSA estimation, focusing on diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability.

Methods

A comprehensive search of EMBASE, MEDLINE (OVID), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. Studies assessing technological tools for TBSA estimation in both human and artificial burns were included. Primary outcomes were accuracy and reliability, while secondary outcomes included speed and user feedback. Study quality was appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results

Thirty-six studies were included: 3D programs (n = 7), mobile applications (n = 11), 3D stereophotogrammetry (n = 8), and machine learning models (n = 10). 3D stereophotogrammetry showed the highest accuracy (mean ICC = 0.988) and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.989). 3D programs demonstrated good diagnostic performance and reduced variability. Mobile applications improved accuracy and consistency, particularly among non-specialists, and offered practical benefits in prehospital settings. Machine learning, though largely in experimental phases, demonstrated promising accuracy, with some models outperforming clinician estimates.

Conclusion

3D stereophotogrammetry provided more consistent and reliable estimates of TBSA, while mobile applications offered practical and scalable solutions. Early machine learning approaches showed potential but remain largely experimental. Overall, most studies were of low quality and methodologically heterogeneous; therefore, definitive conclusions cannot yet be drawn. Further high-quality, real-world research is required to validate accuracy and establish clinical utility.
背景:烧伤患者体表面积(TBSA)的准确和可重复性评估对于指导液体复苏、分诊、转诊决策和整体临床管理至关重要。传统的方法被广泛使用,但容易出现显著的差异和诊断不准确。目的:本系统综述了提高TBSA评估的新兴技术,重点是诊断准确性和评估者之间的可靠性。方法综合检索EMBASE、MEDLINE (OVID)、Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed、Cochrane等数据库。研究评估技术工具评估TBSA在人类和人工烧伤。主要结果是准确性和可靠性,次要结果包括速度和用户反馈。采用QUADAS-2工具评价研究质量。结果共纳入36项研究:3D程序(n = 7)、移动应用程序(n = 11)、3D立体摄影测量(n = 8)和机器学习模型(n = 10)。三维立体摄影测量具有最高的精度(平均ICC = 0.988)和优良的帧间信度(ICC = 0.989)。3D程序显示出良好的诊断性能和减少的可变性。移动应用程序提高了准确性和一致性,特别是在非专业人员中,并在院前环境中提供了实际好处。机器学习虽然在很大程度上还处于实验阶段,但已经显示出了很好的准确性,一些模型的表现超过了临床医生的估计。结论三维立体摄影测量提供了更一致和可靠的TBSA估计,而移动应用提供了实用和可扩展的解决方案。早期的机器学习方法显示出了潜力,但在很大程度上仍处于试验阶段。总的来说,大多数研究质量低,方法不一致;因此,还不能得出明确的结论。需要进一步的高质量、真实世界的研究来验证准确性和建立临床实用性。
{"title":"Advancements in burn size assessment: A systematic review of emerging technologies","authors":"Amy Woods ,&nbsp;Poh Tan,&nbsp;Tamara Mertz,&nbsp;Christopher J. Lewis","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107782","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107782","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate and reproducible assessment of total body surface area (TBSA) in burns is vital for guiding fluid resuscitation, triage, referral decisions, and overall clinical management. Traditional methods are widely used but prone to significant inter-rater variability and diagnostic inaccuracies.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review evaluates emerging technologies developed to improve TBSA estimation, focusing on diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search of EMBASE, MEDLINE (OVID), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. Studies assessing technological tools for TBSA estimation in both human and artificial burns were included. Primary outcomes were accuracy and reliability, while secondary outcomes included speed and user feedback. Study quality was appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-six studies were included: 3D programs (n = 7), mobile applications (n = 11), 3D stereophotogrammetry (n = 8), and machine learning models (n = 10). 3D stereophotogrammetry showed the highest accuracy (mean ICC = 0.988) and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.989). 3D programs demonstrated good diagnostic performance and reduced variability. Mobile applications improved accuracy and consistency, particularly among non-specialists, and offered practical benefits in prehospital settings. Machine learning, though largely in experimental phases, demonstrated promising accuracy, with some models outperforming clinician estimates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>3D stereophotogrammetry provided more consistent and reliable estimates of TBSA, while mobile applications offered practical and scalable solutions. Early machine learning approaches showed potential but remain largely experimental. Overall, most studies were of low quality and methodologically heterogeneous; therefore, definitive conclusions cannot yet be drawn. Further high-quality, real-world research is required to validate accuracy and establish clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comments on: “Red blood cell transfusion risk factors and outcomes in burn patients: A retrospective cohort study” 评论:“红血球输血的危险因素和烧伤患者的预后:一项回顾性队列研究”
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107814
Liying Jin, Xingyi Yang
{"title":"Comments on: “Red blood cell transfusion risk factors and outcomes in burn patients: A retrospective cohort study”","authors":"Liying Jin,&nbsp;Xingyi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107814","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107814","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145736250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An insight into the clinical condition of burn patients with venous catheters 烧伤患者静脉置管的临床情况分析
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107749
Mohammad Hossein Sobhkhizi, Mozhdeh Mohammadghasemi, Negin Mohammadghasemi, Zahra Shahraki
{"title":"An insight into the clinical condition of burn patients with venous catheters","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Sobhkhizi,&nbsp;Mozhdeh Mohammadghasemi,&nbsp;Negin Mohammadghasemi,&nbsp;Zahra Shahraki","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107749","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107749","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145617715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term skin quality and scar formation after enzymatic debridement of deep-dermal burn wounds: A follow-up comparative study of Suprathel® and Jelonet® 深皮烧伤创面酶清创后的长期皮肤质量和瘢痕形成:superthel®和Jelonet®的随访比较研究
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107803
Wolfram Heitzmann , Mitja Mossing , Maria von Kohout , Yasser Alhujaili , Jan Akkan , Paul Christian Fuchs , Rolf Lefering , Jennifer Lynn Schiefer
Recent advances in burn care have highlighted the benefits of enzymatic debridement in reducing long-term scarring by preserving viable dermal structures. Nexobrid®, a bromelain-based enzymatic debridement agent, has become an established treatment modality for deep-dermal burns, particularly of the hand, due to its selective action and tissue-sparing properties. After debridement, the choice of dressing critically influences inflammation, re-epithelialization, and ultimately scar quality and skin function. In clinical practice, Suprathel®, a synthetic copolymer membrane, and Jelonet®, a paraffin-impregnated gauze, are widely used. While Suprathel® offers improved pain control and patient comfort, Jelonet® remains a cost-effective standard.
Building on our previous intra-individual trial, which showed similar healing times but greater patient comfort with Suprathel®, this planned single-center, prospective long-term follow-up aims to address the lack of data on long-term scar quality and skin barrier function after enzymatic debridement. It includes the same 23 patients with deep-dermal hand burns who had received wound coverage with both Suprathel® and Jelonet® on comparable wound areas, assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months using objective instruments (Cutometer®, Mexameter®, Tewameter®, O2C®) and subjective scales (Vancouver Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale).
Both dressings resulted in favorable and largely comparable scar outcomes over 12 months, with no significant differences in elasticity, perfusion, or overall clinical scar appearance. Subtle yet statistically significant differences in transepidermal water loss (p < 0.01) and pigmentation (p < 0.01) indicated a trend toward enhanced epidermal barrier restoration and reduced hypopigmentation in Suprathel®-treated areas, although these effects did not translate into perceptible clinical advantages.
These results confirm that both Suprathel® and Jelonet® are effective options for post-enzymatic debridement wound coverage, showing comparable long-term scar outcomes. The choice may reasonably depend on clinical workflow and dressing-management preferences, with Suprathel® remaining the standard in our burn center due to its reduced frequency of dressing changes.
烧伤护理的最新进展强调了酶清创的好处,通过保留可行的皮肤结构来减少长期疤痕。Nexobrid®是一种以菠萝蛋白酶为基础的酶清创剂,由于其选择性作用和组织保护特性,已成为深层皮肤烧伤,特别是手部烧伤的一种成熟的治疗方式。清创后,敷料的选择严重影响炎症、上皮再生,最终影响疤痕质量和皮肤功能。在临床实践中,Suprathel®是一种合成共聚物膜,Jelonet®是一种石蜡浸渍纱布,被广泛使用。虽然Suprathel®提供改善的疼痛控制和患者舒适度,但Jelonet®仍然是一个具有成本效益的标准。在我们之前的个体内试验的基础上,Suprathel®显示了相似的愈合时间,但患者更舒适,这项计划的单中心前瞻性长期随访旨在解决酶清创后长期疤痕质量和皮肤屏障功能数据的缺乏。它包括同样的23例手部深层烧伤患者,他们在类似的伤口面积上接受了Suprathel®和Jelonet®的伤口覆盖,在3、6和12个月时使用客观仪器(Cutometer®,meexameter®,Tewameter®,O2C®)和主观量表(温哥华疤痕量表,患者和观察者疤痕评估量表)进行评估。两种敷料在12个月的时间里都产生了良好的疤痕结果,并且在很大程度上是相似的,在弹性、灌注或总体临床疤痕外观方面没有显著差异。经皮失水(p <; 0.01)和色素沉着(p <; 0.01)的细微但有统计学意义的差异表明,在Suprathel®治疗区域,表皮屏障恢复增强和色素沉着减少的趋势,尽管这些效果并没有转化为可察觉的临床优势。这些结果证实Suprathel®和Jelonet®都是酶清创后伤口覆盖的有效选择,显示出可比的长期疤痕结局。选择可能合理地取决于临床工作流程和敷料管理偏好,由于其减少了敷料更换的频率,superthel®仍然是我们烧伤中心的标准。
{"title":"Long-term skin quality and scar formation after enzymatic debridement of deep-dermal burn wounds: A follow-up comparative study of Suprathel® and Jelonet®","authors":"Wolfram Heitzmann ,&nbsp;Mitja Mossing ,&nbsp;Maria von Kohout ,&nbsp;Yasser Alhujaili ,&nbsp;Jan Akkan ,&nbsp;Paul Christian Fuchs ,&nbsp;Rolf Lefering ,&nbsp;Jennifer Lynn Schiefer","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107803","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107803","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent advances in burn care have highlighted the benefits of enzymatic debridement in reducing long-term scarring by preserving viable dermal structures. Nexobrid®, a bromelain-based enzymatic debridement agent, has become an established treatment modality for deep-dermal burns, particularly of the hand, due to its selective action and tissue-sparing properties. After debridement, the choice of dressing critically influences inflammation, re-epithelialization, and ultimately scar quality and skin function. In clinical practice, Suprathel®, a synthetic copolymer membrane, and Jelonet®, a paraffin-impregnated gauze, are widely used. While Suprathel® offers improved pain control and patient comfort, Jelonet® remains a cost-effective standard.</div><div>Building on our previous intra-individual trial, which showed similar healing times but greater patient comfort with Suprathel®, this planned single-center, prospective long-term follow-up aims to address the lack of data on long-term scar quality and skin barrier function after enzymatic debridement. It includes the same 23 patients with deep-dermal hand burns who had received wound coverage with both Suprathel® and Jelonet® on comparable wound areas, assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months using objective instruments (Cutometer®, Mexameter®, Tewameter®, O2C®) and subjective scales (Vancouver Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale).</div><div>Both dressings resulted in favorable and largely comparable scar outcomes over 12 months, with no significant differences in elasticity, perfusion, or overall clinical scar appearance. Subtle yet statistically significant differences in transepidermal water loss (p &lt; 0.01) and pigmentation (p &lt; 0.01) indicated a trend toward enhanced epidermal barrier restoration and reduced hypopigmentation in Suprathel®-treated areas, although these effects did not translate into perceptible clinical advantages.</div><div>These results confirm that both Suprathel® and Jelonet® are effective options for post-enzymatic debridement wound coverage, showing comparable long-term scar outcomes. The choice may reasonably depend on clinical workflow and dressing-management preferences, with Suprathel® remaining the standard in our burn center due to its reduced frequency of dressing changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 107803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145571730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Burns
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1