Karen Vázquez‐Segovia, Mark E. Olson, Julio Campo, Guillermo Ángeles, Cristina Martínez‐Garza, Susanne Vetter, Julieta A. Rosell
SummaryAlong their lengths, stems experience different functional demands. Because bark and wood traits are usually studied at single points on stems, it remains unclear how carbon allocation changes along tip‐to‐base trajectories across species.We examined bark vs wood allocation by measuring cross‐sectional areas of outer and inner bark (OB and IB), IB regions (secondary phloem, cortex, and phelloderm), and wood from stem tips to bases of 35 woody angiosperm species of diverse phylogenetic lineages, climates, fire regimes, and bark morphologies. We examined how varied bark vs wood allocation was and how it was affected by precipitation, temperature, soil fertility, leaf habit, and fire regime.Allocation to phloem (relative to wood) varied little across species, whereas allocation to other tissues, strongly affected by the environment or shed in ontogeny, varied widely. Allocation to parenchyma‐rich cortex and phloem was higher at drier sites, suggesting storage. Higher allocation to phloem and cortex also occurred on infertile soils, and to phloem in drought‐deciduous vs cold‐deciduous and evergreen species. Allocation to OB was highest at sites with frequent fires and decreased with fire frequency.Our approach contextualizes inferences from across‐species studies, allows testing functional hypotheses, and contributes to disentangling the functional roles of poorly understood bark tissues.
{"title":"Tip‐to‐base bark cross‐sectional areas contribute to understanding the drivers of carbon allocation to bark and the functional roles of bark tissues","authors":"Karen Vázquez‐Segovia, Mark E. Olson, Julio Campo, Guillermo Ángeles, Cristina Martínez‐Garza, Susanne Vetter, Julieta A. Rosell","doi":"10.1111/nph.20379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20379","url":null,"abstract":"Summary<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Along their lengths, stems experience different functional demands. Because bark and wood traits are usually studied at single points on stems, it remains unclear how carbon allocation changes along tip‐to‐base trajectories across species.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We examined bark vs wood allocation by measuring cross‐sectional areas of outer and inner bark (OB and IB), IB regions (secondary phloem, cortex, and phelloderm), and wood from stem tips to bases of 35 woody angiosperm species of diverse phylogenetic lineages, climates, fire regimes, and bark morphologies. We examined how varied bark vs wood allocation was and how it was affected by precipitation, temperature, soil fertility, leaf habit, and fire regime.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Allocation to phloem (relative to wood) varied little across species, whereas allocation to other tissues, strongly affected by the environment or shed in ontogeny, varied widely. Allocation to parenchyma‐rich cortex and phloem was higher at drier sites, suggesting storage. Higher allocation to phloem and cortex also occurred on infertile soils, and to phloem in drought‐deciduous vs cold‐deciduous and evergreen species. Allocation to OB was highest at sites with frequent fires and decreased with fire frequency.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Our approach contextualizes inferences from across‐species studies, allows testing functional hypotheses, and contributes to disentangling the functional roles of poorly understood bark tissues.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142939922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Melissa Bredow, Ekkachai Khwanbua, Aline Sartor Chicowski, Yunhui Qi, Matthew W. Breitzman, Katerina L. Holan, Peng Liu, Michelle A. Graham, Steven A. Whitham
SummaryIncreasing atmospheric CO2 levels have a variety of effects that can influence plant responses to microbial pathogens. However, these responses are varied, and it is challenging to predict how elevated CO2 (eCO2) will affect a particular plant–pathogen interaction. We investigated how eCO2 may influence disease development and responses to diverse pathogens in the major oilseed crop, soybean.Soybean plants grown in ambient CO2 (aCO2, 419 parts per million (ppm)) or in eCO2 (550 ppm) were challenged with bacterial, viral, fungal, and oomycete pathogens. Disease severity, pathogen growth, gene expression, and molecular plant defense responses were quantified.In eCO2, plants were less susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea (Psg) but more susceptible to bean pod mottle virus, soybean mosaic virus, and Fusarium virguliforme. Susceptibility to Pythium sylvaticum was unchanged, although a greater loss in biomass occurred in eCO2. Reduced susceptibility to Psg was associated with enhanced defense responses. Increased susceptibility to the viruses was associated with reduced expression of antiviral defenses.This work provides a foundation for understanding how future eCO2 levels may impact molecular responses to pathogen challenges in soybean and demonstrates that microbes infecting both shoots and roots are of potential concern in future climatic conditions.
{"title":"Elevated CO2 alters soybean physiology and defense responses, and has disparate effects on susceptibility to diverse microbial pathogens","authors":"Melissa Bredow, Ekkachai Khwanbua, Aline Sartor Chicowski, Yunhui Qi, Matthew W. Breitzman, Katerina L. Holan, Peng Liu, Michelle A. Graham, Steven A. Whitham","doi":"10.1111/nph.20364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20364","url":null,"abstract":"Summary<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Increasing atmospheric CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> levels have a variety of effects that can influence plant responses to microbial pathogens. However, these responses are varied, and it is challenging to predict how elevated CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> (<jats:italic>e</jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>) will affect a particular plant–pathogen interaction. We investigated how <jats:italic>e</jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> may influence disease development and responses to diverse pathogens in the major oilseed crop, soybean.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Soybean plants grown in ambient CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> (<jats:italic>a</jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>, 419 parts per million (ppm)) or in <jats:italic>e</jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> (550 ppm) were challenged with bacterial, viral, fungal, and oomycete pathogens. Disease severity, pathogen growth, gene expression, and molecular plant defense responses were quantified.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>In <jats:italic>e</jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>, plants were less susceptible to <jats:italic>Pseudomonas syringae</jats:italic> pv. <jats:italic>glycinea</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>Psg</jats:italic>) but more susceptible to bean pod mottle virus, soybean mosaic virus, and <jats:italic>Fusarium virguliforme</jats:italic>. Susceptibility to <jats:italic>Pythium sylvaticum</jats:italic> was unchanged, although a greater loss in biomass occurred in <jats:italic>e</jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>. Reduced susceptibility to <jats:italic>Psg</jats:italic> was associated with enhanced defense responses. Increased susceptibility to the viruses was associated with reduced expression of antiviral defenses.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>This work provides a foundation for understanding how future <jats:italic>e</jats:italic>CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> levels may impact molecular responses to pathogen challenges in soybean and demonstrates that microbes infecting both shoots and roots are of potential concern in future climatic conditions.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142939866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}