首页 > 最新文献

法学最新文献

英文 中文
IF:
Knowledge complexity and intercity technology transfer in China, 2001–2020 知识复杂性与中国城际技术转移(2001-2020
IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103246
Kang Sun, Yingcheng Li
While regional innovation capabilities play a crucial role in technology transfer, existing studies often lack nuanced measures of innovation capabilities and instead focus primarily on the “quantity” of technology transfer. This paper leverages the concept of knowledge complexity to explore its influences on both the “quantity” and “complexity” of intercity technology transfer. Drawing upon a dataset of more than 10 million patents from the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), we calculate the knowledge complexity index (KCI) for 252 Chinese cities and the technological complexity index (TCI) for 622 four-digit technological fields from 2001 to 2020 to capture the “complexity” dimension of technology transfer. Our empirical results reveal an increasing polarization of the KCI distribution among Chinese cities and significant differences between the “quantity” and “complexity” networks of intercity technology transfer. Using fixed-effect panel regression models and an instrumental variable approach, we identify a robust, causal inverted-U relationship between intercity KCI disparities and both the “quantity” and “complexity” of technology transfer. While moderate intercity KCI disparities promote technology transfer, larger disparities hinder it due to limitations in absorptive capacity. Moreover, this inverted-U relationship is heterogeneous across technology sectors and cities, being more pronounced for the transfer of technologies with low and moderate TCI, and for technology transfers between cities with relatively stronger innovation capacities. These findings contribute to the understanding of technology transfer from a knowledge complexity perspective and provide policy insights for designing smart technological specialization strategies in China.
虽然区域创新能力在技术转移中起着至关重要的作用,但现有研究往往缺乏创新能力的细致度量,而是主要关注技术转移的“数量”。本文运用知识复杂性的概念,探讨知识复杂性对城际技术转移“数量”和“复杂性”的影响。利用中国国家知识产权局(CNIPA)的1000多万件专利数据集,我们计算了2001 - 2020年中国252个城市的知识复杂性指数(KCI)和622个四位数技术领域的技术复杂性指数(TCI),以捕捉技术转移的“复杂性”维度。实证结果表明,中国城市间技术转移的KCI分布呈两极分化趋势,城际技术转移的“数量”网络和“复杂性”网络存在显著差异。使用固定效应面板回归模型和工具变量方法,我们发现城际KCI差异与技术转移的“数量”和“复杂性”之间存在稳健的因果倒u关系。适度的城市间KCI差异促进了技术转移,而较大的差异则由于吸收能力的限制而阻碍了技术转移。此外,这种倒u型关系在技术部门和城市之间具有异质性,在低、中等技术创新能力的技术转移中更为明显,在创新能力相对较强的城市之间的技术转移中更为明显。这些发现有助于从知识复杂性的角度理解技术转移,并为设计中国的智能技术专业化战略提供政策见解。
{"title":"Knowledge complexity and intercity technology transfer in China, 2001–2020","authors":"Kang Sun,&nbsp;Yingcheng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103246","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103246","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While regional innovation capabilities play a crucial role in technology transfer, existing studies often lack nuanced measures of innovation capabilities and instead focus primarily on the “quantity” of technology transfer. This paper leverages the concept of knowledge complexity to explore its influences on both the “quantity” and “complexity” of intercity technology transfer. Drawing upon a dataset of more than 10 million patents from the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), we calculate the knowledge complexity index (KCI) for 252 Chinese cities and the technological complexity index (TCI) for 622 four-digit technological fields from 2001 to 2020 to capture the “complexity” dimension of technology transfer. Our empirical results reveal an increasing polarization of the KCI distribution among Chinese cities and significant differences between the “quantity” and “complexity” networks of intercity technology transfer. Using fixed-effect panel regression models and an instrumental variable approach, we identify a robust, causal inverted-U relationship between intercity KCI disparities and both the “quantity” and “complexity” of technology transfer. While moderate intercity KCI disparities promote technology transfer, larger disparities hinder it due to limitations in absorptive capacity. Moreover, this inverted-U relationship is heterogeneous across technology sectors and cities, being more pronounced for the transfer of technologies with low and moderate TCI, and for technology transfers between cities with relatively stronger innovation capacities. These findings contribute to the understanding of technology transfer from a knowledge complexity perspective and provide policy insights for designing smart technological specialization strategies in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103246"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International digital trade in E7 countries: The role of national digital innovation capacity in international trade transformation E7国家的国际数字贸易:国家数字创新能力在国际贸易转型中的作用
IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103254
Yasir Ali , Wei Long , Hayat Khan
Digital trade has developed as a transformative force in the global economy, transforming traditional trade patterns through seamless exchanges of digital trade worldwide. In light of this transition, a crucial question is how national digital innovation capacity (DI) and its various developmental stages (access, usage, and skills) among the E7 emerging economies (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, and Turkey) affect digital trade. This study aims to fill this research gap by exploring the effect of national digital innovation capacity and its developmental stages on digital trade, specifically in the presence of economic freedom, population, economic growth, and institutional quality in the E7 emerging economies. The cointegration analysis shows a long-run association between the analysed variables, where the Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) analysis reveals that population, economic growth, DI, and its developmental stages significantly increase digital trade, while institutional quality significantly reduces digital trade in E7 emerging economies. Digital skills are found to be more important than digital access and usage for digital trade. However, the impact of economic freedom on digital trade is insignificant. Policymakers and regulators should prioritize strengthening national digital innovation capacity across developmental stages while improving institutional quality to promote digital trade in the E7 emerging economies.
数字贸易已发展成为全球经济的变革力量,通过全球数字贸易的无缝交换,改变了传统的贸易模式。鉴于这一转变,一个关键问题是E7新兴经济体(巴西、中国、印度、印度尼西亚、墨西哥、俄罗斯和土耳其)的国家数字创新能力(DI)及其不同发展阶段(获取、使用和技能)如何影响数字贸易。本研究旨在通过探索国家数字创新能力及其发展阶段对数字贸易的影响,特别是在经济自由、人口、经济增长和制度质量存在的情况下,填补这一研究空白。协整分析显示了所分析变量之间的长期关联,其中矩分位数回归(MMQR)分析显示,人口、经济增长、DI及其发展阶段显著增加了数字贸易,而制度质量显著降低了E7新兴经济体的数字贸易。在数字贸易中,数字技能比数字获取和使用更为重要。然而,经济自由对数字贸易的影响是微不足道的。政策制定者和监管机构应优先加强各发展阶段的国家数字创新能力,同时提高制度质量,以促进E7新兴经济体的数字贸易。
{"title":"International digital trade in E7 countries: The role of national digital innovation capacity in international trade transformation","authors":"Yasir Ali ,&nbsp;Wei Long ,&nbsp;Hayat Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103254","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103254","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital trade has developed as a transformative force in the global economy, transforming traditional trade patterns through seamless exchanges of digital trade worldwide. In light of this transition, a crucial question is how national digital innovation capacity (DI) and its various developmental stages (access, usage, and skills) among the E7 emerging economies (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, and Turkey) affect digital trade. This study aims to fill this research gap by exploring the effect of national digital innovation capacity and its developmental stages on digital trade, specifically in the presence of economic freedom, population, economic growth, and institutional quality in the E7 emerging economies. The cointegration analysis shows a long-run association between the analysed variables, where the Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) analysis reveals that population, economic growth, DI, and its developmental stages significantly increase digital trade, while institutional quality significantly reduces digital trade in E7 emerging economies. Digital skills are found to be more important than digital access and usage for digital trade. However, the impact of economic freedom on digital trade is insignificant. Policymakers and regulators should prioritize strengthening national digital innovation capacity across developmental stages while improving institutional quality to promote digital trade in the E7 emerging economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103254"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Healthcare organizations in entrepreneurial ecosystems: an integrative framework and future research agenda 创业生态系统中的医疗保健组织:综合框架和未来研究议程
IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103245
Jasna Poček
Entrepreneurial ecosystems as lenses promoting innovation and entrepreneurship have attracted substantial interest in research. However attention towards the role of sector-specific actors, such as healthcare-related organizations, within entrepreneurial ecosystems remains underexplored. This paper investigates how healthcare-related organizations are conceptualized within entrepreneurial ecosystem research through an integrative review of the literature addressing EEs and healthcare. The findings show that healthcare entrepreneurs are often portrayed as actors addressing both commercial and public health purposes. Hospitals are perceived as laboratories of collaboration and learning, combining care delivery with innovation-oriented activities, while life sciences are seen as critical to regional innovation and development by attracting scientific knowledge and enabling translation into entrepreneurial opportunities. Institutional and resource dynamics are also perceived as important for healthcare and entrepreneurship ecosystems, through facilitation of resource mobilization and regulatory adaptation. Based on this review, the paper develops a framework that positions healthcare organizations within entrepreneurial ecosystems according to their degree of hybridity and ecosystem roles. This research contributes to EE literature by examining entrepreneurial ecosystems research through a sector-sensitive and relational perspective. The paper offers a framework and research agenda calling for more exploration of institutional complexity, patient-centred innovation, the evolving role of hospitals, and hybrid governance models in entrepreneurial ecosystems.
创业生态系统作为促进创新和创业精神的透镜,已经引起了人们对研究的极大兴趣。然而,对企业生态系统中特定部门行为者(如医疗保健相关组织)作用的关注仍未得到充分探讨。本文通过对EEs和医疗保健相关文献的综合回顾,研究了创业生态系统研究中医疗保健相关组织的概念。调查结果表明,医疗保健企业家经常被描绘成既能解决商业问题又能解决公共卫生问题的行动者。医院被视为协作和学习的实验室,将护理提供与面向创新的活动相结合,而生命科学被视为吸引科学知识并使其转化为创业机会的区域创新和发展的关键。通过促进资源调动和调整监管,机构和资源动态也被认为对保健和创业生态系统很重要。在此基础上,本文开发了一个框架,根据其混合程度和生态系统角色,将医疗保健组织置于创业生态系统中。本研究通过行业敏感和关系视角考察了创业生态系统研究,从而为EE文献做出了贡献。本文提供了一个框架和研究议程,呼吁更多地探索制度复杂性、以患者为中心的创新、医院不断演变的角色以及创业生态系统中的混合治理模式。
{"title":"Healthcare organizations in entrepreneurial ecosystems: an integrative framework and future research agenda","authors":"Jasna Poček","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103245","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103245","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Entrepreneurial ecosystems as lenses promoting innovation and entrepreneurship have attracted substantial interest in research. However attention towards the role of sector-specific actors, such as healthcare-related organizations, within entrepreneurial ecosystems remains underexplored. This paper investigates how healthcare-related organizations are conceptualized within entrepreneurial ecosystem research through an integrative review of the literature addressing EEs and healthcare. The findings show that healthcare entrepreneurs are often portrayed as actors addressing both commercial and public health purposes. Hospitals are perceived as laboratories of collaboration and learning, combining care delivery with innovation-oriented activities, while life sciences are seen as critical to regional innovation and development by attracting scientific knowledge and enabling translation into entrepreneurial opportunities. Institutional and resource dynamics are also perceived as important for healthcare and entrepreneurship ecosystems, through facilitation of resource mobilization and regulatory adaptation. Based on this review, the paper develops a framework that positions healthcare organizations within entrepreneurial ecosystems according to their degree of hybridity and ecosystem roles. This research contributes to EE literature by examining entrepreneurial ecosystems research through a sector-sensitive and relational perspective. The paper offers a framework and research agenda calling for more exploration of institutional complexity, patient-centred innovation, the evolving role of hospitals, and hybrid governance models in entrepreneurial ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103245"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defining socially disruptive technologies and reframing the ethical challenges they pose 定义社会颠覆性技术并重新定义它们带来的道德挑战
IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103216
Joel Anderson , Jeroen Hopster , Björn Lundgren
Socially Disruptive Technologies (SDTs) loom large in public debate, yet scholarly discourse on the ethical implications of social disruption is still in its infancy. This article makes two contributions to advance this discourse. First, we propose and defend a new definition of SDTs that allows for classification of those technologies that warrant further ethical analysis, specifically in virtue of their socially disruptive nature (among the examples we discuss are deepfakes, cultured meat, birth control technologies). This is the applied value of the framework we offer: to offer guidance in identifying which technologies require specific scrutiny as SDT, and guidance in identifying an initial set of ethical tools to accompany such analysis. Second, we reframe the ethics of social disruption by highlighting how SDTs pose challenges to capacities for normative orientation and joint action-coordination and by foregrounding the potentially stratified availability of the resources needed to overcome or mitigate these challenges. We argue that although the burdensome disruptiveness means that SDTs characteristically have, at least in a “narrow” sense, a pro tanto negative valence, they may nonetheless turn out to contribute to significant social and moral progress. The ethical concerns raised by SDTs require an approach that is sensitive both to the challenges inherent in the disruption and to its eventual outcome.
社会颠覆性技术(SDTs)在公众辩论中显得尤为突出,但关于社会颠覆的伦理含义的学术论述仍处于起步阶段。本文为推进这一论述做出了两方面的贡献。首先,我们提出并捍卫了sdt的新定义,该定义允许对那些需要进一步伦理分析的技术进行分类,特别是由于它们的社会破坏性(我们讨论的例子包括深度造假、培养肉、节育技术)。这就是我们提供的框架的应用价值:为确定哪些技术需要作为SDT进行具体审查提供指导,并为确定伴随此类分析的初始道德工具集提供指导。其次,我们通过强调可持续发展技术如何对规范导向和联合行动协调能力构成挑战,并通过强调克服或减轻这些挑战所需资源的潜在分层可用性,重新构建社会破坏的伦理。我们认为,尽管沉重的破坏性意味着sdt具有典型的(至少在“狭义”上)亲负效价,但它们仍然可能对重大的社会和道德进步做出贡献。sdt提出的伦理问题要求我们采取一种方法,既要对颠覆所固有的挑战敏感,也要对其最终结果敏感。
{"title":"Defining socially disruptive technologies and reframing the ethical challenges they pose","authors":"Joel Anderson ,&nbsp;Jeroen Hopster ,&nbsp;Björn Lundgren","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103216","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103216","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Socially Disruptive Technologies (SDTs) loom large in public debate, yet scholarly discourse on the ethical implications of social disruption is still in its infancy. This article makes two contributions to advance this discourse. First, we propose and defend a new definition of SDTs that allows for classification of those technologies that warrant further ethical analysis, specifically in virtue of their socially disruptive nature (among the examples we discuss are deepfakes, cultured meat, birth control technologies). This is the applied value of the framework we offer: to offer guidance in identifying which technologies require specific scrutiny as SDT, and guidance in identifying an initial set of ethical tools to accompany such analysis. Second, we reframe the ethics of social disruption by highlighting how SDTs pose challenges to capacities for normative orientation and joint action-coordination and by foregrounding the potentially stratified availability of the resources needed to overcome or mitigate these challenges. We argue that although the burdensome disruptiveness means that SDTs characteristically have, at least in a “narrow” sense, a <em>pro tanto</em> negative valence, they may nonetheless turn out to contribute to significant social and moral progress. The ethical concerns raised by SDTs require an approach that is sensitive both to the challenges inherent in the disruption and to its eventual outcome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103216"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
User perceptions of credibility signals: A conjoint analysis of technological features in news platform 用户对可信度信号的感知:新闻平台技术特征的联合分析
IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103252
Jungwoo Nam , Nahyun Park , Haeyoon Lee , Jungwoo Shin , Daeho Lee , Jieun Shin
In the era of information overload, the absence of centralized gatekeeping makes it increasingly difficult for users to evaluate the credibility of online news. Drawing on signaling theory, this study examines how technological characteristics embedded in platform interfaces serve as credibility signals that shape user preferences and willingness to pay. We focus on three attributes of online news platforms—interactivity, hypertextuality, and multimediality—and investigate their influence through a conjoint survey and mixed logit analysis. Our findings indicate that users consistently prefer credibility signals. Specifically, content modality, which represents multimediality, is the most influential factor in shaping user preferences, whereas human review verification is valued most highly in monetary terms. These results suggest that costly technological features operate as signals of online news quality, guiding credibility assessments and subscription decisions. The study extends signaling theory by applying it to online news platforms and linking it with research on information systems and human–computer interaction. In practice, the results provide guidance for platform managers and designers, emphasizing that verification and multimedia features can strengthen user preferences, enhance perceptions of credibility, and support revenue models. Thus, the study bridges theoretical insight with managerial relevance for the future development of online news platforms.
在信息过载的时代,缺乏集中把关使得用户越来越难以评估网络新闻的可信度。利用信号理论,本研究探讨了嵌入在平台界面中的技术特征如何作为可信度信号,影响用户偏好和支付意愿。我们关注在线新闻平台的三个属性——互动性、超文本性和多媒体——并通过联合调查和混合逻辑分析来调查它们的影响。我们的研究结果表明,用户始终更喜欢可信度信号。具体来说,内容模式,代表了多媒体,是塑造用户偏好的最具影响力的因素,而人工审查验证在金钱方面是最受重视的。这些结果表明,昂贵的技术特征作为在线新闻质量的信号,指导可信度评估和订阅决策。该研究扩展了信号理论,将其应用于在线新闻平台,并将其与信息系统和人机交互研究联系起来。在实践中,结果为平台管理者和设计师提供了指导,强调验证和多媒体功能可以增强用户偏好,增强可信度感知,并支持收入模型。因此,该研究为网络新闻平台的未来发展架起了理论洞察力和管理相关性的桥梁。
{"title":"User perceptions of credibility signals: A conjoint analysis of technological features in news platform","authors":"Jungwoo Nam ,&nbsp;Nahyun Park ,&nbsp;Haeyoon Lee ,&nbsp;Jungwoo Shin ,&nbsp;Daeho Lee ,&nbsp;Jieun Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103252","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103252","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the era of information overload, the absence of centralized gatekeeping makes it increasingly difficult for users to evaluate the credibility of online news. Drawing on signaling theory, this study examines how technological characteristics embedded in platform interfaces serve as credibility signals that shape user preferences and willingness to pay. We focus on three attributes of online news platforms—interactivity, hypertextuality, and multimediality—and investigate their influence through a conjoint survey and mixed logit analysis. Our findings indicate that users consistently prefer credibility signals. Specifically, content modality, which represents multimediality, is the most influential factor in shaping user preferences, whereas human review verification is valued most highly in monetary terms. These results suggest that costly technological features operate as signals of online news quality, guiding credibility assessments and subscription decisions. The study extends signaling theory by applying it to online news platforms and linking it with research on information systems and human–computer interaction. In practice, the results provide guidance for platform managers and designers, emphasizing that verification and multimedia features can strengthen user preferences, enhance perceptions of credibility, and support revenue models. Thus, the study bridges theoretical insight with managerial relevance for the future development of online news platforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103252"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating frictions and drivers in international research collaboration – the case of BRICS nations 驾驭国际研究合作中的摩擦和驱动因素——以金砖国家为例
IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103241
Angelica Pigola , Bruno Fischer , Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes , Dirk Meissner , Zhou Yuan , Zhongzhen Miao
International research collaboration plays an increasingly important role in shaping global scientific agendas. Yet limited empirical attention has been given to how these dynamics unfold in emerging economies. This paper investigates the effects of collaboration frictions, execution challenges, strategic incentives, and trust asymmetries on scientific outcomes in international research collaborations among BRICS academics. Drawing on transaction cost economics, organizational behavior, and process-based trust theory, we develop and test a structural model using survey data from 396 respondents engaged in international collaborative research. Scientific outcomes are defined as tangible and strategic outputs such as technological innovations, R&D infrastructure, and institutional agreements. Contrary to expectations, execution challenges are positively associated with scientific outcomes, suggesting that operational complexity may reflect innovation ambition rather than dysfunction. Strategic incentives emerge as the strongest positive predictor of scientific outcomes. Trust asymmetries, though not directly associated with outcomes, significantly moderate collaboration mechanisms—attenuating the positive influence of strategic incentives and weakening the positive association between execution challenges and scientific outcomes under relational imbalance, while indicating that the relationship between collaboration frictions and scientific outcomes varies across trust conditions. These results challenge conventional assumptions that prioritize friction-free coordination, instead highlighting how relational imbalances can distort collaboration dynamics. The study contributes to a more context-sensitive understanding of research governance in the Global South and offers practical insights into designing resilient, equitable partnerships in complex environments.
国际研究合作在形成全球科学议程方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而,对于这些动态如何在新兴经济体中展开,实证关注有限。本文研究了合作摩擦、执行挑战、战略激励和信任不对称对金砖国家学者国际科研合作成果的影响。利用交易成本经济学、组织行为学和基于过程的信任理论,我们利用参与国际合作研究的396名受访者的调查数据,开发并检验了一个结构模型。科学成果被定义为有形的和战略性的产出,如技术创新、研发基础设施和制度协议。与预期相反,执行挑战与科学成果呈正相关,这表明操作复杂性可能反映的是创新雄心,而不是功能障碍。战略激励是科学成果最有力的积极预测因素。信任不对称虽然与成果没有直接关系,但显著调节了合作机制——在关系不平衡的情况下,削弱了战略激励的积极影响,减弱了执行挑战与科学成果之间的正相关,同时表明合作摩擦与科学成果之间的关系在不同的信任条件下有所不同。这些结果挑战了优先考虑无摩擦协调的传统假设,而不是强调关系不平衡如何扭曲协作动态。该研究有助于对全球发展中国家的研究治理有更具体的理解,并为在复杂环境中设计有弹性、公平的伙伴关系提供了实际见解。
{"title":"Navigating frictions and drivers in international research collaboration – the case of BRICS nations","authors":"Angelica Pigola ,&nbsp;Bruno Fischer ,&nbsp;Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes ,&nbsp;Dirk Meissner ,&nbsp;Zhou Yuan ,&nbsp;Zhongzhen Miao","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103241","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103241","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>International research collaboration plays an increasingly important role in shaping global scientific agendas. Yet limited empirical attention has been given to how these dynamics unfold in emerging economies. This paper investigates the effects of collaboration frictions, execution challenges, strategic incentives, and trust asymmetries on scientific outcomes in international research collaborations among BRICS academics. Drawing on transaction cost economics, organizational behavior, and process-based trust theory, we develop and test a structural model using survey data from 396 respondents engaged in international collaborative research. Scientific outcomes are defined as tangible and strategic outputs such as technological innovations, R&amp;D infrastructure, and institutional agreements. Contrary to expectations, execution challenges are positively associated with scientific outcomes, suggesting that operational complexity may reflect innovation ambition rather than dysfunction. Strategic incentives emerge as the strongest positive predictor of scientific outcomes. Trust asymmetries, though not directly associated with outcomes, significantly moderate collaboration mechanisms—attenuating the positive influence of strategic incentives and weakening the positive association between execution challenges and scientific outcomes under relational imbalance, while indicating that the relationship between collaboration frictions and scientific outcomes varies across trust conditions. These results challenge conventional assumptions that prioritize friction-free coordination, instead highlighting how relational imbalances can distort collaboration dynamics. The study contributes to a more context-sensitive understanding of research governance in the Global South and offers practical insights into designing resilient, equitable partnerships in complex environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103241"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146081663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating sustainable growth: Decoding the influence of digital economy on economic sustainability 引导可持续增长:解读数字经济对经济可持续性的影响
IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103247
Muhammad Umair Rafiq , Yixiang Zhang , Shaham Saleem
The digital economy can offer transformative pathways to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation, heralding a sustainable future. In this context, can digital economy promote economic sustainability? This study investigates this relationship across European countries from 2003 to 2019 based on the awareness-motivation-capability framework. A new economic sustainability index is developed. By applying system generalized method of moments technique, the findings unveil a significant positive effect of the digital economy on economic sustainability. In terms of moderating impacts, natural resource depletion and research and development positively moderate and strengthen the digital economy’s impact on economic sustainability. Regarding mediating effects, this research identifies circular economy and energy efficiency, categorized as carrying capacity, along with financial development and institutional quality, classified as absorptive capacity, which positively mediate the association between the digital economy and economic sustainability. These findings highlight how the digital economy promotes economic sustainability, guiding policymakers in integrating digital initiatives.
数字经济可以提供变革性的途径,使经济增长与环境退化脱钩,预示着一个可持续的未来。在此背景下,数字经济能否促进经济的可持续发展?本研究基于意识-动机-能力框架调查了2003年至2019年欧洲国家的这种关系。提出了一种新的经济可持续性指标。运用系统广义矩量法,揭示了数字经济对经济可持续性的显著正向影响。在调节影响方面,自然资源枯竭和研发正向调节和增强数字经济对经济可持续性的影响。在中介效应方面,本研究发现循环经济和能源效率(被归类为承载能力)以及金融发展和制度质量(被归类为吸收能力)在数字经济与经济可持续性之间具有正向中介作用。这些发现突出了数字经济如何促进经济可持续性,指导政策制定者整合数字举措。
{"title":"Navigating sustainable growth: Decoding the influence of digital economy on economic sustainability","authors":"Muhammad Umair Rafiq ,&nbsp;Yixiang Zhang ,&nbsp;Shaham Saleem","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103247","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103247","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The digital economy can offer transformative pathways to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation, heralding a sustainable future. In this context, can digital economy promote economic sustainability? This study investigates this relationship across European countries from 2003 to 2019 based on the awareness-motivation-capability framework. A new economic sustainability index is developed. By applying system generalized method of moments technique, the findings unveil a significant positive effect of the digital economy on economic sustainability. In terms of moderating impacts, natural resource depletion and research and development positively moderate and strengthen the digital economy’s impact on economic sustainability. Regarding mediating effects, this research identifies circular economy and energy efficiency, categorized as carrying capacity, along with financial development and institutional quality, classified as absorptive capacity, which positively mediate the association between the digital economy and economic sustainability. These findings highlight how the digital economy promotes economic sustainability, guiding policymakers in integrating digital initiatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103247"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Embedding AI ethics in the data lifecycle: A framework for enterprise AI governance 在数据生命周期中嵌入人工智能伦理:企业人工智能治理框架
IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103261
Xinping Huang , Tianqi Kou , Qianwen Zhou
Enterprises adopting AI often face a persistent gap between ethical principles and concrete operational practices. To address this challenge, this study proposes a data-centered governance framework that embeds ethical considerations throughout the AI data lifecycle. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyze internationally representative AI ethics and data governance policy documents through grounded theory, informed by Value Sensitive Design and socio-technical systems theory. The resulting framework comprises four governance dimensions—macro values, technical foundations, actor practices, and organizational arrangements—operationalized through twenty indicators. Indicator weights are further derived using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process based on assessments from enterprise practitioners. The findings reveal a strong emphasis on institutional accountability and technical compliance, while commitments to value-level ethical ideals and internal governance capacity receive comparatively less attention. Building on these results, we propose a practical governance framework that integrates accountability mechanisms, technical safeguards, and normative principles across the data lifecycle. Supplementary qualitative insights from cross-sector interviews further illuminate sectoral differences in implementation. Overall, the framework supports enterprises in operationalizing AI ethics and offers policymakers an empirical basis for bridging the ethics–practice gap.
采用人工智能的企业往往面临道德原则与具体运营实践之间的持续差距。为了应对这一挑战,本研究提出了一个以数据为中心的治理框架,在整个人工智能数据生命周期中嵌入伦理考虑。采用混合方法,我们通过基于价值敏感设计和社会技术系统理论的理论,分析了具有国际代表性的人工智能伦理和数据治理政策文件。由此产生的框架包括四个治理维度——宏观价值、技术基础、参与者实践和组织安排——通过20个指标进行操作。在企业从业人员评价的基础上,利用模糊层次分析法进一步推导指标权重。研究结果显示,机构问责制和技术合规性受到了高度重视,而对价值层面的道德理想和内部治理能力的承诺受到的关注相对较少。在这些结果的基础上,我们提出了一个实用的治理框架,该框架集成了整个数据生命周期的问责机制、技术保障和规范原则。来自跨部门访谈的补充定性见解进一步阐明了执行方面的部门差异。总体而言,该框架支持企业实施人工智能伦理,并为政策制定者提供弥合伦理与实践差距的经验基础。
{"title":"Embedding AI ethics in the data lifecycle: A framework for enterprise AI governance","authors":"Xinping Huang ,&nbsp;Tianqi Kou ,&nbsp;Qianwen Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103261","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103261","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enterprises adopting AI often face a persistent gap between ethical principles and concrete operational practices. To address this challenge, this study proposes a data-centered governance framework that embeds ethical considerations throughout the AI data lifecycle. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyze internationally representative AI ethics and data governance policy documents through grounded theory, informed by Value Sensitive Design and socio-technical systems theory. The resulting framework comprises four governance dimensions—macro values, technical foundations, actor practices, and organizational arrangements—operationalized through twenty indicators. Indicator weights are further derived using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process based on assessments from enterprise practitioners. The findings reveal a strong emphasis on institutional accountability and technical compliance, while commitments to value-level ethical ideals and internal governance capacity receive comparatively less attention. Building on these results, we propose a practical governance framework that integrates accountability mechanisms, technical safeguards, and normative principles across the data lifecycle. Supplementary qualitative insights from cross-sector interviews further illuminate sectoral differences in implementation. Overall, the framework supports enterprises in operationalizing AI ethics and offers policymakers an empirical basis for bridging the ethics–practice gap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103261"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How did the transition toward virtual education change lecturers’ appraisal forms? 向虚拟教育的过渡如何改变了讲师的评估形式?
IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102771
Emanuel Tamir , Yonatan Shertzer , Edna Rabenu , Orit Gilor , Yair Maayan
This study explores the change in expectations for institutional lecturers during the transition to virtual education before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our goal is to examine how the criteria used to evaluate lecturers’ performance, as operationalized in student evaluations of teaching (SET), both reflect and shape lecturer roles during the shift to virtual education. The research relies on analysis of feedback forms, including an examination of teaching committee protocols, interviews with academic managers holding positions in teaching centers, and program and department heads. The findings indicate that the role of lecturers expanded broadly, including increased responsibilities towards students and the integration of digital technology into teaching. The discussion draws on Herbert Simon's 'Satisficing' theory and Charles Lindblom's 'Incrementalism' theory to interpret the approach of academic institutions toward the evolving role of lecturers in virtual education. This study contributes to the definition of effective teaching standards and high-quality education and helps institutions to customize their lecturer training for the digital age.
本研究探讨了在COVID-19大流行之前和期间向虚拟教育过渡期间机构讲师期望的变化。我们的目标是研究在学生教学评估(SET)中,用于评估讲师表现的标准如何反映和塑造讲师在向虚拟教育转变过程中的角色。这项研究依赖于对反馈表格的分析,包括对教学委员会协议的审查,对在教学中心担任职位的学术经理以及项目和部门负责人的采访。研究结果表明,讲师的角色得到了广泛的扩展,包括对学生的责任增加,以及将数字技术融入教学。讨论借鉴了赫伯特·西蒙的“满足”理论和查尔斯·林德布洛姆的“增量主义”理论来解释学术机构对虚拟教育中讲师角色演变的态度。本研究有助于定义有效的教学标准和高质量的教育,并帮助机构根据数字时代定制讲师培训。
{"title":"How did the transition toward virtual education change lecturers’ appraisal forms?","authors":"Emanuel Tamir ,&nbsp;Yonatan Shertzer ,&nbsp;Edna Rabenu ,&nbsp;Orit Gilor ,&nbsp;Yair Maayan","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102771","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102771","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the change in expectations for institutional lecturers during the transition to virtual education before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our goal is to examine how the criteria used to evaluate lecturers’ performance, as operationalized in student evaluations of teaching (SET), both reflect and shape lecturer roles during the shift to virtual education. The research relies on analysis of feedback forms, including an examination of teaching committee protocols, interviews with academic managers holding positions in teaching centers, and program and department heads. The findings indicate that the role of lecturers expanded broadly, including increased responsibilities towards students and the integration of digital technology into teaching. The discussion draws on Herbert Simon's 'Satisficing' theory and Charles Lindblom's 'Incrementalism' theory to interpret the approach of academic institutions toward the evolving role of lecturers in virtual education. This study contributes to the definition of effective teaching standards and high-quality education and helps institutions to customize their lecturer training for the digital age.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146175337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two-mode network autoregressive model for network analysis with core nodes 带核心节点的网络分析双模网络自回归模型
IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2026.01.004
Huiyun Tang , Moxuan Mi , Yingying Ma , Haisheng Yang , Feifei Wang
In recent decades, there is an increasing interest in analyzing two-mode networks, which are constructed by two types of nodes. In two-mode networks, the core nodes (such as the superstars in social platforms) are often encountered in practice. These core nodes could generate different network influences compared to ordinary nodes. Then considering the effect of core nodes in network analysis becomes an important problem. To address this problem, we propose a novel network autoregressive model for two-mode networks with core nodes. It assumes each type of nodes can be split into the core group and the ordinary group. Then a network autoregressive model with different cross-mode effects for the core group and the ordinary group is established. We further extend this model to incorporate the interaction effects between different groups of nodes (e.g., the core group of Type I and the ordinary group of Type II). The theoretical properties of the proposed models are investigated. The finite sample performance is assessed through a variety of simulations. Finally, we apply the proposed models to a real security dataset to explore the influences between fund performance and analysts.
近几十年来,人们对分析由两种类型的节点构成的双模网络越来越感兴趣。在双模网络中,核心节点(如社交平台中的超级明星)在实践中经常会遇到。这些核心节点可以产生不同于普通节点的网络影响。那么考虑核心节点在网络分析中的作用就成为一个重要的问题。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了一种新的具有核心节点的双模网络自回归模型。它假设每种类型的节点都可以分为核心组和普通组。然后建立了核心组和普通组具有不同交叉模态效应的网络自回归模型。我们进一步扩展了该模型,纳入了不同节点群体之间的交互效应(例如,类型I的核心组和类型II的普通组)。研究了所提模型的理论性质。通过各种模拟对有限样本性能进行了评估。最后,我们将提出的模型应用于真实的证券数据集,以探索基金绩效与分析师之间的影响。
{"title":"Two-mode network autoregressive model for network analysis with core nodes","authors":"Huiyun Tang ,&nbsp;Moxuan Mi ,&nbsp;Yingying Ma ,&nbsp;Haisheng Yang ,&nbsp;Feifei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socnet.2026.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent decades, there is an increasing interest in analyzing two-mode networks, which are constructed by two types of nodes. In two-mode networks, the <em>core nodes</em> (such as the superstars in social platforms) are often encountered in practice. These core nodes could generate different network influences compared to ordinary nodes. Then considering the effect of core nodes in network analysis becomes an important problem. To address this problem, we propose a novel network autoregressive model for two-mode networks with core nodes. It assumes each type of nodes can be split into the <em>core group</em> and the <em>ordinary group</em>. Then a network autoregressive model with different cross-mode effects for the core group and the ordinary group is established. We further extend this model to incorporate the interaction effects between different groups of nodes (e.g., the core group of Type I and the ordinary group of Type II). The theoretical properties of the proposed models are investigated. The finite sample performance is assessed through a variety of simulations. Finally, we apply the proposed models to a real security dataset to explore the influences between fund performance and analysts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"86 ","pages":"Pages 75-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146189496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
全部 Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. Africa (Lond) African Affairs African Studies Review AJS American Journal of Law & Medicine Agric. Hum. Values Am. Anthropol. Anthropol. Med. Antipode Archives of Sexual Behavior Anthropos Area Bulletin of Latin American Research Child Welfare 中国司法鉴定 Child & Family Social Work Comparative Political Studies Drugs (Abingdon Engl) Environment and Planning. E, Nature and Space Ethics & International Affairs ERDKUNDE European Journal of Social Work European Union Politics Foreign Aff French Cultural Studies Geoforum 贵州科学 Harm Reduction Journal Human Studies History (Lond) Hum Ecol Interdiscip J International Journal of Social Research Methodology Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs Journal of Drug Issues J. Environ. Plann. Policy Manage. Journal of Forensic Medicine Journal of Gender Studies Journal of Public Child Welfare Journal of Rural Studies J Soc Issues Journal of Social Work Education 山西省政法管理干部学院学报 Journal of Youth Studies Land Use Policy Millennium - Journal of International Studies Middle East J Parliamentary Affairs Pacific Focus Political Communication Polit Sci Science and culture Slavic Review Security Dialogue Sociological Methods & Research Social work Sociol Forum (Randolph N J) Social Indic. Res. South Atl Q Sociological Science Transfer (Bruss) Violence Against Women International Communication of Chinese Culture Journal of the Copyright Society of the Usa Journal of Criminology Zeitschrift Fur Ethnologie Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal Social Anthropology Geografie-Sbornik CGS International Social Science Journal Journal of Social Sciences Systems Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine Data Comparative Migration Studies She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation 社会 Research and Politics Social Inclusion Anthropozoologica Studies in Conflict & Terrorism Intersecciones En Antropologia Journal of Legal Education Business and Politics Securities Regulation Law Journal Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation 中国法学前沿 China Nonprofit Review Romanian Journal of Political Science Feministische Studien Austrian Journal of Political Science Internasjonal Politikk Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada Etud Fr Sociologus Nieuwe West Indische Gids Asia Pacific Law Review Review of Central and East European Law Eastern European Countryside
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1