首页 > 最新文献

Minerva chirurgica最新文献

英文 中文
The impact of the surgical technique on stenosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single center study on 5235 patients. 手术技术对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后狭窄的影响:5235例患者的单中心研究。
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-09 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08505-3
P. Termine, Cristian E Boru, F. Turcu, C. Copăescu
BACKGROUNDLaparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) has gained worldwide popularity in the last 10 years as self alone bariatric procedure. Symptomatic Stenosis (SS) is a potential severe postoperative complication and it can be divided in organic stenosis (OS) and functional stenosis (FS). The aim of this paper is to propose a modified surgical technique to prevent FS.METHODSA retrospective review on 5235 LSG performed in Ponderas Academic Hospital between January 2011 and December 2019, searched FS in two consecutive patients groups, divided based on the modified surgical technique introduced in 2015, with fixation of the gastric tube to the pre-pancreatic fascia and stapler line's over-sewn running suture.RESULTSGroup A (2011-2014) included 1332 LSG, 16 SS were registered (1.2%), 7 OS and 9 FS; 3903 LSG included in group B (2015-2019), counting for 37 SS (0.95%), 27 OS and 10 FS. A statistically significant difference between the 2 groups was observed for the FS incidence (p=0.03), while it was non-significant for the OS (p=0.52) and the total number of SS (p=0.43). The endoscopic approach was used in forty-eight SS (90.5%) with a successful rate of 83%, while specifically for the FS it was 100%; only one complication was registered during endoscopic treatment, that required further surgical solution.CONCLUSIONSfixation of the gastric tube to the pre-pancreatic fascia and stapler line's over-sewn running suture during LSG, introduced lately, are beneficial in preventing the postoperative functional stenosis of the LSG, contributing to the improvement of the patient's quality of life.
背景腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)在过去10年中作为一种单独的减肥手术在世界范围内越来越受欢迎。症状性狭窄(SS)是一种潜在的严重术后并发症,可分为器质性狭窄(OS)和功能性狭窄(FS)。本文的目的是提出一种预防FS的改良手术技术。METHODSA对2011年1月至2019年12月在Ponderas Academic Hospital进行的5235例LSG进行了回顾性审查,在两个连续的患者组中搜索FS,根据2015年引入的改良手术技术进行划分,将胃导管固定在胰前筋膜上,缝合线的上缝运行缝线。结果A组(2011-2014)包括1332名LSG,16名SS注册(1.2%),7名OS和9名FS;B组(2015-2019)包括3903例LSG,包括37例SS(0.95%)、27例OS和10例FS。两组FS发生率(p=0.03)存在统计学显著差异,而OS(p=0.52)和SS总数(p=0.43)无显著差异。48例SS采用内镜入路(90.5%),成功率为83%,而FS的成功率为100%;在内镜治疗过程中,只有一个并发症需要进一步的手术解决。结论近年来在LSG术中采用胰前筋膜固定和缝合线超缝运行缝合,有利于预防LSG术后功能性狭窄,有助于提高患者的生活质量。
{"title":"The impact of the surgical technique on stenosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single center study on 5235 patients.","authors":"P. Termine, Cristian E Boru, F. Turcu, C. Copăescu","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08505-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08505-3","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) has gained worldwide popularity in the last 10 years as self alone bariatric procedure. Symptomatic Stenosis (SS) is a potential severe postoperative complication and it can be divided in organic stenosis (OS) and functional stenosis (FS). The aim of this paper is to propose a modified surgical technique to prevent FS.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A retrospective review on 5235 LSG performed in Ponderas Academic Hospital between January 2011 and December 2019, searched FS in two consecutive patients groups, divided based on the modified surgical technique introduced in 2015, with fixation of the gastric tube to the pre-pancreatic fascia and stapler line's over-sewn running suture.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Group A (2011-2014) included 1332 LSG, 16 SS were registered (1.2%), 7 OS and 9 FS; 3903 LSG included in group B (2015-2019), counting for 37 SS (0.95%), 27 OS and 10 FS. A statistically significant difference between the 2 groups was observed for the FS incidence (p=0.03), while it was non-significant for the OS (p=0.52) and the total number of SS (p=0.43). The endoscopic approach was used in forty-eight SS (90.5%) with a successful rate of 83%, while specifically for the FS it was 100%; only one complication was registered during endoscopic treatment, that required further surgical solution.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000fixation of the gastric tube to the pre-pancreatic fascia and stapler line's over-sewn running suture during LSG, introduced lately, are beneficial in preventing the postoperative functional stenosis of the LSG, contributing to the improvement of the patient's quality of life.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44140689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ventral hernia repair in bariatric patients. 减肥患者的腹疝修补术。
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-09 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08497-7
D. Lomanto, A. Shabbir
Morbid Obesity is increasing worldwide at fast pace with associated co-morbidities also on the rise. Considering that Obesity is one of the main risk factor for developing a Ventral Hernia this will results that in the future we will experience a rise in those hernia in patients undergoing any abdominal surgery. There is no clarity on the best timing and choice for procedures. We are well aware also on the difficulties in hernia repair surgery and the relative outcome so adding obesity as co-factors amplify the challenges. In fact, today both general surgeons with expertise in abdominal wall repair and bariatric surgeons are faced with a new dilemma: the obese patient with an abdominal wall hernia. This article will briefly review the impact of obesity on the natural history of hernia, its associated complication, management strategies and outcome.
病态肥胖在全球范围内快速增长,相关的合并症也在上升。考虑到肥胖是腹疝的主要危险因素之一,这将导致在未来,我们会看到在接受任何腹部手术的患者中,腹疝的发病率会上升。目前还不清楚手术的最佳时机和选择。我们也很清楚疝气修补手术的困难和相关的结果,所以增加肥胖作为辅助因素增加了挑战。事实上,今天无论是腹壁修复专业的普通外科医生还是减肥外科医生都面临着一个新的困境:患有腹壁疝的肥胖患者。本文将简要回顾肥胖对疝的自然病程、相关并发症、治疗策略和结果的影响。
{"title":"Ventral hernia repair in bariatric patients.","authors":"D. Lomanto, A. Shabbir","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08497-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08497-7","url":null,"abstract":"Morbid Obesity is increasing worldwide at fast pace with associated co-morbidities also on the rise. Considering that Obesity is one of the main risk factor for developing a Ventral Hernia this will results that in the future we will experience a rise in those hernia in patients undergoing any abdominal surgery. There is no clarity on the best timing and choice for procedures. We are well aware also on the difficulties in hernia repair surgery and the relative outcome so adding obesity as co-factors amplify the challenges. In fact, today both general surgeons with expertise in abdominal wall repair and bariatric surgeons are faced with a new dilemma: the obese patient with an abdominal wall hernia. This article will briefly review the impact of obesity on the natural history of hernia, its associated complication, management strategies and outcome.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41637242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does the learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery impact circumferential resection margin involvement and reoperation rates? A risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis. 机器人直肠癌症手术中的学习曲线是否影响环切边缘的参与和再次手术率?风险调整后的累计和分析。
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-09 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08491-6
M. Gachabayov, T. Yamaguchi, Seon-Hahn Kim, R. Jiménez-Rodríguez, Li-Jen Kuo, Mirkhalig Javadov, R. Bergamaschi
BACKGROUNDThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgeons' learning curve in robotic surgery for rectal cancer on circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement and reoperation rates.METHODSLearning curve data were prospectively collected from four centers. Patients undergoing robotic proctectomy for resectable rectal cancer were included. CRM was involved when ≥1 mm. TME quality was classified as complete, nearly complete, or incomplete. T-test and Chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis was utilized to evaluate the effect of the learning curve on primary endpoints. Univariate analysis of potential risk factors for CRM involvement and reoperation was performed. Factors with the p-value ≤0.2 were included in the multivariate logistic regression model for further RA-CUSUM analysis.RESULTSA total of 221 patients (80, 36, 62, and 43 patients operated on by surgeons 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively) who underwent robotic surgery for rectal cancer during the surgeons' learning curves were included. CRM involvement rate was 0%, 11%, 3%, and 5% in surgeons 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Reoperation rate was 3.7%, 8.3%, 4.8%, and 11.6%, respectively. RA-CUSUM analysis of CRM involvement (R2=0.9886) and reoperation (R2=0.9891) found a statistically significant decreasing trend in aggregate CUSUM values throughout the learning curve.CONCLUSIONSThis study found a continued significant decrease in CRM involvement and reoperation rates throughout the learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery.
本研究的目的是评估机器人直肠癌手术中外科医生的学习曲线对环切缘(CRM)累及和再手术率的影响。方法前瞻性收集4个中心的学习曲线资料。接受机器人直肠切除术治疗可切除直肠癌的患者也包括在内。≥1 mm时涉及CRM。TME质量分为完全、接近完成和不完全。分别采用t检验和卡方检验比较连续变量和分类变量。采用风险调整累积和(RA-CUSUM)分析来评估学习曲线对主要终点的影响。对介入和再手术的潜在危险因素进行单因素分析。将p值≤0.2的因素纳入多元logistic回归模型,进一步进行RA-CUSUM分析。结果共纳入221例(分别由1、2、3、4位外科医生进行手术的分别为80例、36例、62例和43例)在外科医生学习曲线期间接受机器人手术治疗的直肠癌患者。外科医生1、2、3和4的CRM介入率分别为0%、11%、3%和5%。再手术率分别为3.7%、8.3%、4.8%、11.6%。对CRM介入(R2=0.9886)和再操作(R2=0.9891)的RA-CUSUM分析发现,在整个学习曲线中,总CUSUM值有统计学意义上的下降趋势。本研究发现,在机器人直肠癌手术的学习过程中,CRM介入和再手术率持续显著下降。
{"title":"Does the learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery impact circumferential resection margin involvement and reoperation rates? A risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis.","authors":"M. Gachabayov, T. Yamaguchi, Seon-Hahn Kim, R. Jiménez-Rodríguez, Li-Jen Kuo, Mirkhalig Javadov, R. Bergamaschi","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08491-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08491-6","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgeons' learning curve in robotic surgery for rectal cancer on circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement and reoperation rates.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000Learning curve data were prospectively collected from four centers. Patients undergoing robotic proctectomy for resectable rectal cancer were included. CRM was involved when ≥1 mm. TME quality was classified as complete, nearly complete, or incomplete. T-test and Chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis was utilized to evaluate the effect of the learning curve on primary endpoints. Univariate analysis of potential risk factors for CRM involvement and reoperation was performed. Factors with the p-value ≤0.2 were included in the multivariate logistic regression model for further RA-CUSUM analysis.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000A total of 221 patients (80, 36, 62, and 43 patients operated on by surgeons 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively) who underwent robotic surgery for rectal cancer during the surgeons' learning curves were included. CRM involvement rate was 0%, 11%, 3%, and 5% in surgeons 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Reoperation rate was 3.7%, 8.3%, 4.8%, and 11.6%, respectively. RA-CUSUM analysis of CRM involvement (R2=0.9886) and reoperation (R2=0.9891) found a statistically significant decreasing trend in aggregate CUSUM values throughout the learning curve.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000This study found a continued significant decrease in CRM involvement and reoperation rates throughout the learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48964275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Revascularization of iatrogenic intraoperative injury to a major artery during hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: a single-center experience in China. 肝胆胰手术中医源性大动脉损伤的血运重建:中国的单中心经验。
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07546-6
Yong Shi, Yinan Su, Chong-hui Li, Haida Shi, Yu-rong Liang
BACKGROUNDAlthough uncommon during hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HBP) surgery, iatrogenic intraoperative injury to a major artery requires prompt and appropriate repair. Here, we outline our surgical experience with the repair of this injury, and compare our experience to findings garnered from a selective review of the literature.METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical diagnoses, surgical methods, sites of arterial injury, operative repair, intra-operative blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, post-operative management, and outcome of 17 consecutive patients who sustained iatrogenic intra-operative injuries to major arteries during HBP surgery between January 2008 and December 2013.RESULTSDepending on the location and extent of injury, suture repair, primary end-to-end anastomosis, artery transposition, interposition grafting, or arterio-portal shunting were used. Postoperative morbidity occurred in three cases and there was only one case of in-hospital mortality (5.9%). No arterial thrombosis or other repairrelated complications were found after the operation with a follow-up duration of 6 months.CONCLUSIONSThe use of an optimal repair method for injured arteries based on their location and extent resulted in a satisfactory outcome.
背景尽管在肝胆胰(HBP)手术中并不常见,但医源性术中大动脉损伤需要及时适当的修复。在这里,我们概述了我们修复这种损伤的手术经验,并将我们的经验与选择性文献综述中的发现进行了比较。方法回顾性分析临床诊断、手术方法、动脉损伤部位、手术修复、术中失血、输血要求、术后处理等,以及2008年1月至2013年12月期间连续17名在HBP手术中遭受医源性大动脉术中损伤的患者的结果。结果根据损伤的位置和程度,采用缝合修复、一次端到端吻合、动脉转位、间置移植或动脉-门静脉分流。术后发病率为3例,住院死亡1例(5.9%)。术后随访6个月,未发现动脉血栓形成或其他修复相关并发症。结论根据损伤动脉的位置和范围,采用最佳的修复方法可获得满意的结果。
{"title":"Revascularization of iatrogenic intraoperative injury to a major artery during hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: a single-center experience in China.","authors":"Yong Shi, Yinan Su, Chong-hui Li, Haida Shi, Yu-rong Liang","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07546-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07546-6","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Although uncommon during hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HBP) surgery, iatrogenic intraoperative injury to a major artery requires prompt and appropriate repair. Here, we outline our surgical experience with the repair of this injury, and compare our experience to findings garnered from a selective review of the literature.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000We retrospectively analyzed the clinical diagnoses, surgical methods, sites of arterial injury, operative repair, intra-operative blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, post-operative management, and outcome of 17 consecutive patients who sustained iatrogenic intra-operative injuries to major arteries during HBP surgery between January 2008 and December 2013.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Depending on the location and extent of injury, suture repair, primary end-to-end anastomosis, artery transposition, interposition grafting, or arterio-portal shunting were used. Postoperative morbidity occurred in three cases and there was only one case of in-hospital mortality (5.9%). No arterial thrombosis or other repairrelated complications were found after the operation with a follow-up duration of 6 months.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000The use of an optimal repair method for injured arteries based on their location and extent resulted in a satisfactory outcome.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45082590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Concomitant hiatal hernia repair during bariatric surgery: does the reinforcement make the difference? 减肥手术中同时进行的裂孔疝修补术:加固有区别吗?
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-02 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08503-X
C. Boru, P. Termine, P. Antypas, A. Iossa, M. C. Ciccioriccio, F. de Angelis, Alessandra Micalizzi, G. Silecchia
BACKGROUNDHiatal hernia repair (HHR) is still controversial during bariatric procedures, especially in case of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).AIMSto report the long-term results of concomitant HHR, evaluating the safety and efficacy of posterior cruroplasty (PC), simple or reinforced with biosynthetic, absorbable Bio-A® mesh (Gore, USA). Primary endpoint: PC's failure, defined as symptomatic HH recurrence, nonresponding to medical treatment and requiring revisional surgery.METHODSthe prospective database of 1876 bariatric operations performed in a center of excellence between 2011-2019 was searched for concomitant HHR. Intraoperative measurement of the hiatal surface area (HSA) was performed routinely.RESULTSA total of 250 patients undergone bariatric surgery and concomitant HHR (13%). Simple PC (group A, 151 patients) was performed during 130 LSG, 5 re-sleeves and 16 gastric bypasses; mean BMI 43.4 ± 5.8 kg/m2, HSA mean size 3.4 ± 2 cm2. Reinforced PC (group B) was performed in 99 cases: 62 primary LSG, 22 LGB and 15 revisions of LSG; mean BMI 44.6 ± 7.7 kg/m2, HSA mean size 6.7 ± 2 cm2. PC's failure, with intrathoracic migration (ITM) of the LSG was encountered in 12 cases (8%) of simple vs. only 4 cases (4%) of reinforced PC (p=0.23); hence, a repeat, reinforced PC and R-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) was performed laparoscopically in all cases. No mesh-related complications were registered perioperatively or after long-term follow-up (mean 50 months). One case of cardiac metaplasia without goblet cells was detected 4 years postoperatively; conversion to LRYGB, with reinforced redo of the PC was performed. The Cox hazard analysis showed that the use of more than four stitches for cruroplasty represents a negative factor on recurrence (HR = 8; p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONSAn aggressive search for and repair of HH during any bariatric procedure seems advisable, allowing a low HH recurrence rates. Additional measures, like mesh reinforcement of crural closure with biosynthetic, absorbable mesh, seem to improve results on long term follow-up, especially in case of larger hiatal defects. In our experience, reinforcement of even smaller defects seems advisable in obese population.
背景:裂孔疝修补术(HHR)在减肥手术中仍然存在争议,特别是在腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)的情况下。目的:报告合并HHR的长期结果,评估单纯或增强生物合成可吸收Bio-A®补片的后胆囊成形术(PC)的安全性和有效性(Gore, USA)。主要终点:PC失败,定义为有症状的HH复发,对药物治疗无反应,需要翻修手术。方法检索2011-2019年在某卓越中心进行的1876例减肥手术的前瞻性数据库,以寻找伴随的HHR。术中常规测量裂孔表面积(HSA)。结果共有250例患者接受了减肥手术并伴有HHR(13%)。单纯PC (A组,151例)共行130例LSG, 5例复套,16例胃旁路;平均BMI为43.4±5.8 kg/m2, HSA平均体型为3.4±2 cm2。强化PC (B组)99例:原发LSG 62例,LGB 22例,改型LSG 15例;平均BMI为44.6±7.7 kg/m2, HSA平均体型为6.7±2 cm2。单纯PC组12例(8%)出现胸内移位(ITM),强化PC组仅4例(4%)出现胸内移位(p=0.23);因此,所有病例均在腹腔镜下进行重复强化PC和R-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)。围手术期或长期随访(平均50个月)均未出现补片相关并发症。术后4年无杯状细胞的心脏化生1例;转换为LRYGB,并对PC进行了强化重做。Cox风险分析显示,使用4针以上的结肠镜成形术是复发的不利因素(HR = 8;P < 0.05)。结论:在任何减肥手术中积极寻找和修复HH似乎是可取的,可以降低HH的复发率。其他措施,如用生物合成、可吸收的补片补片加强脚闭合,似乎可以改善长期随访的结果,特别是在裂孔缺陷较大的情况下。根据我们的经验,在肥胖人群中,加强更小的缺陷似乎是可取的。
{"title":"Concomitant hiatal hernia repair during bariatric surgery: does the reinforcement make the difference?","authors":"C. Boru, P. Termine, P. Antypas, A. Iossa, M. C. Ciccioriccio, F. de Angelis, Alessandra Micalizzi, G. Silecchia","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08503-X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08503-X","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Hiatal hernia repair (HHR) is still controversial during bariatric procedures, especially in case of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).\u0000\u0000\u0000AIMS\u0000to report the long-term results of concomitant HHR, evaluating the safety and efficacy of posterior cruroplasty (PC), simple or reinforced with biosynthetic, absorbable Bio-A® mesh (Gore, USA). Primary endpoint: PC's failure, defined as symptomatic HH recurrence, nonresponding to medical treatment and requiring revisional surgery.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000the prospective database of 1876 bariatric operations performed in a center of excellence between 2011-2019 was searched for concomitant HHR. Intraoperative measurement of the hiatal surface area (HSA) was performed routinely.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000A total of 250 patients undergone bariatric surgery and concomitant HHR (13%). Simple PC (group A, 151 patients) was performed during 130 LSG, 5 re-sleeves and 16 gastric bypasses; mean BMI 43.4 ± 5.8 kg/m2, HSA mean size 3.4 ± 2 cm2. Reinforced PC (group B) was performed in 99 cases: 62 primary LSG, 22 LGB and 15 revisions of LSG; mean BMI 44.6 ± 7.7 kg/m2, HSA mean size 6.7 ± 2 cm2. PC's failure, with intrathoracic migration (ITM) of the LSG was encountered in 12 cases (8%) of simple vs. only 4 cases (4%) of reinforced PC (p=0.23); hence, a repeat, reinforced PC and R-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) was performed laparoscopically in all cases. No mesh-related complications were registered perioperatively or after long-term follow-up (mean 50 months). One case of cardiac metaplasia without goblet cells was detected 4 years postoperatively; conversion to LRYGB, with reinforced redo of the PC was performed. The Cox hazard analysis showed that the use of more than four stitches for cruroplasty represents a negative factor on recurrence (HR = 8; p < 0.05).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000An aggressive search for and repair of HH during any bariatric procedure seems advisable, allowing a low HH recurrence rates. Additional measures, like mesh reinforcement of crural closure with biosynthetic, absorbable mesh, seem to improve results on long term follow-up, especially in case of larger hiatal defects. In our experience, reinforcement of even smaller defects seems advisable in obese population.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44516724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Minimally invasive surgery for abdominal wall defects: where are we now? 腹壁缺损的微创手术:进展如何?
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08582-X
Mario Guerrieri
{"title":"Minimally invasive surgery for abdominal wall defects: where are we now?","authors":"Mario Guerrieri","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08582-X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08582-X","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38629107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bariatric surgery in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatus hernia. 胃食管反流病和/或裂孔疝患者的减肥手术
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-06 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08486-2
Anmol Ahuja, Kamal Mahawar
INTRODUCTION Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) and Hiatus Hernia(HH) are frequently encountered comorbidities in patients seeking Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (BMS) for obesity. Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) are the three commonest bariatric procedures performed worldwide. The purpose of this review was to analyse and compare the data on outcomes of these three procedures in patients with GORD and/or HH. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We examined published English language scientific literature available on PubMed for data comparing SG, RYGB, and OAGB with specific focus on GORD outcomes and outcomes in those with GORD and/or HH. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Several authors have addressed the outcome of GORD after bariatric surgery. There have been randomised control trials and comparative studies in the literature comparing the results of these procedure. But very few studies have exclusively looked into the outcome of different procedures in patients with pre-existing GORD and/or HH. In this narrative review, we evaluate pros and cons of three commonest bariatric procedures worldwide in this subgroup of patients seeking BMS. We also suggest an algorithm on the basis of our experience and the available data in scientific literature. CONCLUSIONS Though RYGB is the best anti reflux procedure it is associated with significant higher morbidity/mortality as compared to SG and OAGB. These two procedures can be used in the majority of patients with GORD and/or HH seeking BMS with an acceptance that some patients will need conversion to RYGB in the long term.
胃食管反流病(GERD)和裂孔疝(HH)是寻求减肥和代谢手术(BMS)治疗肥胖的患者经常遇到的合并症。套筒胃切除术(SG)、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)和一次吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)是世界范围内最常见的三种减肥手术。本综述的目的是分析和比较这三种手术在胃食管反流和/或HH患者中的结果数据。证据获取:我们检查了PubMed上已发表的英语科学文献,以比较SG、RYGB和OAGB的数据,并特别关注GERD和/或HH患者的结果。证据综合:几位作者讨论了减肥手术后胃反流的结果。文献中有随机对照试验和比较研究,比较这些手术的结果。但很少有研究专门研究了不同手术对已有胃食管反流和/或HH患者的影响。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们评估了全球范围内寻求BMS的患者中三种最常见的减肥手术的利弊。我们还根据我们的经验和科学文献中的可用数据提出了一种算法。结论:虽然RYGB是最好的抗反流手术,但与SG和OAGB相比,RYGB的发病率/死亡率明显更高。这两种方法可用于大多数寻求BMS的GERD和/或HH患者,并接受一些患者长期需要转换为RYGB。
{"title":"Bariatric surgery in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatus hernia.","authors":"Anmol Ahuja,&nbsp;Kamal Mahawar","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08486-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08486-2","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) and Hiatus Hernia(HH) are frequently encountered comorbidities in patients seeking Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (BMS) for obesity. Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) are the three commonest bariatric procedures performed worldwide. The purpose of this review was to analyse and compare the data on outcomes of these three procedures in patients with GORD and/or HH. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We examined published English language scientific literature available on PubMed for data comparing SG, RYGB, and OAGB with specific focus on GORD outcomes and outcomes in those with GORD and/or HH. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Several authors have addressed the outcome of GORD after bariatric surgery. There have been randomised control trials and comparative studies in the literature comparing the results of these procedure. But very few studies have exclusively looked into the outcome of different procedures in patients with pre-existing GORD and/or HH. In this narrative review, we evaluate pros and cons of three commonest bariatric procedures worldwide in this subgroup of patients seeking BMS. We also suggest an algorithm on the basis of our experience and the available data in scientific literature. CONCLUSIONS Though RYGB is the best anti reflux procedure it is associated with significant higher morbidity/mortality as compared to SG and OAGB. These two procedures can be used in the majority of patients with GORD and/or HH seeking BMS with an acceptance that some patients will need conversion to RYGB in the long term.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38244770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Possible impact of COVID-19 on gastric cancer surgery in Italy. COVID-19对意大利胃癌手术的可能影响
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-06 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08381-9
Fausto Rosa, Sergio Alfieri
{"title":"Possible impact of COVID-19 on gastric cancer surgery in Italy.","authors":"Fausto Rosa,&nbsp;Sergio Alfieri","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08381-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08381-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38245855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center. 腹腔镜修补腹股沟疝:回顾性比较TEP和TAPP程序在三级转诊中心。
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08518-1
Monica Ortenzi, Sophie Williams, Nidaa Solanki, Mario Guerrieri, Amyn Haji
BACKGROUND The technical evolution of hernia repair has brought to the introduction of laparoscopy in this field. The most common laparoscopic techniques are transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. Indirect comparisons between TAPP and TEP have raised questions as to which is the superior approach in improving patient outcomes; however, there is still a scarcity of data directly comparing these laparoscopic approaches. The aim of this report is to offer a retrospective comparison between the two techniques with a long-term follow-up. METHODS This study is a retrospective comparative study, comparing TEP and TAPP in the treatment of groin hernias. All patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair from 2015 and 2020 at a large UK Hospital Trust with tertiary referral center, were considered as eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was rate of successful surgery defined as absence of recurrence and chronic pain at the end of the follow-up. Secondary endpoints were conversion rate (the switch from TEP to TAPP was considered as a conversion for the index procedure), need for admission, readmission rate, serious adverse events (including visceral injuries and vascular injuries), rate of persisting pain at the end of follow-up, operative time and overall complications rate (hematoma, seroma, wound/superficial infection, mesh/deep infection, port site hernia). RESULTS Of the patients included in the study who underwent laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia between 2015 and 2020, 140 (55.1%) underwent TEP and 114 (44.9%) had TAPP repair. The mean operative time did not differ between the two groups (P=0.202). The conversion rate was nil. The two procedures did not differ for intraoperative and postoperative complications. The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the TAPP group (P<0.0001). The overall recurrence rate was 2.4%. and did not differ between the two groups. Costs were acquired from the clinical coding department. Mean costs were measured in pounds sterling and a significant difference was noted between the two groups (P=0.083). In the short term, the most common complication was seroma formation and was significantly more frequent in the TAPP group (P<0.001). In the long term, chronic pain was the most frequent complication in both groups and significant correlated when the operation performed for recurrent hernia, whereas the hernia Type 3 was a factor that which influenced recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, TAPP and TEP have similar, overall complication risks, postoperative acute and chronic pain incidence and recurrence rates. Since TAPP and TEP have comparable outcomes it is recommended that the choice of the technique should be based on the surgeon's skills, education, and experience.
背景:随着疝修补技术的发展,腹腔镜技术在疝修补领域的应用越来越广泛。最常见的腹腔镜技术是经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修复和完全腹膜外(TEP)修复。TAPP和TEP之间的间接比较提出了关于哪种方法在改善患者预后方面更好的问题;然而,仍然缺乏直接比较这些腹腔镜入路的数据。本报告的目的是通过长期随访对两种技术进行回顾性比较。方法:回顾性比较TEP与TAPP治疗腹股沟疝的疗效。2015年至2020年在一家大型英国医院信托基金三级转诊中心接受腹腔镜疝修补术的所有患者均被认为符合纳入条件。主要终点是手术成功率,定义为随访结束时无复发和慢性疼痛。次要终点是转换率(从TEP到TAPP的转换被认为是指标程序的转换)、入院需要、再入院率、严重不良事件(包括内脏损伤和血管损伤)、随访结束时持续疼痛率、手术时间和总并发症率(血肿、血肿、伤口/浅表感染、补片/深部感染、端口部位疝)。结果:本研究纳入的2015 - 2020年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者中,140例(55.1%)行TEP, 114例(44.9%)行TAPP修补术。两组平均手术时间差异无统计学意义(P=0.202)。转化率为零。两种方法在术中和术后并发症方面没有差异。结论:TAPP组患者住院时间明显长于TEP组(p < 0.05)。结论:TAPP组与TEP组总体并发症发生率、术后急慢性疼痛发生率及复发率相似。由于TAPP和TEP的结果可比较,因此建议根据外科医生的技能、教育和经验来选择技术。
{"title":"Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center.","authors":"Monica Ortenzi,&nbsp;Sophie Williams,&nbsp;Nidaa Solanki,&nbsp;Mario Guerrieri,&nbsp;Amyn Haji","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08518-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08518-1","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND The technical evolution of hernia repair has brought to the introduction of laparoscopy in this field. The most common laparoscopic techniques are transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. Indirect comparisons between TAPP and TEP have raised questions as to which is the superior approach in improving patient outcomes; however, there is still a scarcity of data directly comparing these laparoscopic approaches. The aim of this report is to offer a retrospective comparison between the two techniques with a long-term follow-up. METHODS This study is a retrospective comparative study, comparing TEP and TAPP in the treatment of groin hernias. All patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair from 2015 and 2020 at a large UK Hospital Trust with tertiary referral center, were considered as eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was rate of successful surgery defined as absence of recurrence and chronic pain at the end of the follow-up. Secondary endpoints were conversion rate (the switch from TEP to TAPP was considered as a conversion for the index procedure), need for admission, readmission rate, serious adverse events (including visceral injuries and vascular injuries), rate of persisting pain at the end of follow-up, operative time and overall complications rate (hematoma, seroma, wound/superficial infection, mesh/deep infection, port site hernia). RESULTS Of the patients included in the study who underwent laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia between 2015 and 2020, 140 (55.1%) underwent TEP and 114 (44.9%) had TAPP repair. The mean operative time did not differ between the two groups (P=0.202). The conversion rate was nil. The two procedures did not differ for intraoperative and postoperative complications. The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the TAPP group (P<0.0001). The overall recurrence rate was 2.4%. and did not differ between the two groups. Costs were acquired from the clinical coding department. Mean costs were measured in pounds sterling and a significant difference was noted between the two groups (P=0.083). In the short term, the most common complication was seroma formation and was significantly more frequent in the TAPP group (P<0.001). In the long term, chronic pain was the most frequent complication in both groups and significant correlated when the operation performed for recurrent hernia, whereas the hernia Type 3 was a factor that which influenced recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, TAPP and TEP have similar, overall complication risks, postoperative acute and chronic pain incidence and recurrence rates. Since TAPP and TEP have comparable outcomes it is recommended that the choice of the technique should be based on the surgeon's skills, education, and experience.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38629108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Minimally invasive repair of ventral hernia with one third of tackers and fibrin glue: less pain and same recurrence rate. 三分之一粘接剂联合纤维蛋白胶微创修复腹疝:疼痛减轻,复发率相同。
IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08468-0
Salvador Morales-Conde, Andrea Balla, Isaias Alarcón, Maria Sánchez-Ramírez

Background: Aim of this study was to assess whether the reduction in the number of tackers maintains a similar recurrence rate and to subsequently evaluate whether this reduction associated with fibrin adhesive (FA) influences postsurgical pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) at 5 years follow-up.

Methods: Fifty patients with ventral hernia (intervention group) underwent to LVHR with the double crown (DC) technique with a decrease in the number of tackers, each tacker being separated by about 3 cm associated with FA to seal the spaces between them. Data obtained from intervention group were compared to data obtained from a historical series of 50 patients (control group) undergoing LVHR using DC technique with tackers at 1 cm each other.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between groups about patients' characteristics. Mean hospital stay was 2 days. Statistically significant differences were observed about hospital stay between both groups U-Mann-Whitney ([UMW] =345, P=0) being higher in the control group. Statistically significant difference was observed in the postoperative pain evaluated by the visual analogical scale (VAS) score, having 95% of patients in the control group with VAS less than or equal to 7 compared to 4.55 in the intervention group. Recurrence rate was 4.1% for the control group versus 4.2% in the intervention group.

Conclusions: The reduction of metallic tackers associated with FA does not present statistically significant differences in the recurrence rate in comparison to conventional DC technique. In the intervention group a reduction in postoperative pain and hospital stay were observed.

背景:本研究的目的是评估黏着者数量的减少是否能维持相似的复发率,并随后评估纤维蛋白粘接剂(FA)的减少是否影响腹腔镜腹疝修复(LVHR)术后5年随访的疼痛。方法:50例腹疝患者(干预组)采用双冠(DC)技术行LVHR,减少钉钉数量,每个钉钉间隔约3cm,并结合FA密封间隙。将干预组的数据与50例患者(对照组)的历史数据进行比较,这些患者使用DC技术进行LVHR,每个患者间隔1cm。结果:两组患者的特征差异无统计学意义。平均住院时间2天。两组住院时间差异有统计学意义U-Mann-Whitney ([UMW] =345, P=0)高于对照组。术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分差异有统计学意义,对照组95%的患者VAS小于等于7,干预组为4.55%。对照组复发率为4.1%,干预组为4.2%。结论:与传统的DC技术相比,与FA相关的金属支架的减少在复发率上没有统计学上的显著差异。干预组术后疼痛减轻,住院时间缩短。
{"title":"Minimally invasive repair of ventral hernia with one third of tackers and fibrin glue: less pain and same recurrence rate.","authors":"Salvador Morales-Conde,&nbsp;Andrea Balla,&nbsp;Isaias Alarcón,&nbsp;Maria Sánchez-Ramírez","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08468-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08468-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aim of this study was to assess whether the reduction in the number of tackers maintains a similar recurrence rate and to subsequently evaluate whether this reduction associated with fibrin adhesive (FA) influences postsurgical pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) at 5 years follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients with ventral hernia (intervention group) underwent to LVHR with the double crown (DC) technique with a decrease in the number of tackers, each tacker being separated by about 3 cm associated with FA to seal the spaces between them. Data obtained from intervention group were compared to data obtained from a historical series of 50 patients (control group) undergoing LVHR using DC technique with tackers at 1 cm each other.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between groups about patients' characteristics. Mean hospital stay was 2 days. Statistically significant differences were observed about hospital stay between both groups U-Mann-Whitney ([UMW] =345, P=0) being higher in the control group. Statistically significant difference was observed in the postoperative pain evaluated by the visual analogical scale (VAS) score, having 95% of patients in the control group with VAS less than or equal to 7 compared to 4.55 in the intervention group. Recurrence rate was 4.1% for the control group versus 4.2% in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reduction of metallic tackers associated with FA does not present statistically significant differences in the recurrence rate in comparison to conventional DC technique. In the intervention group a reduction in postoperative pain and hospital stay were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38629110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
期刊
Minerva chirurgica
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1