While biodiversity issues are increasingly recognised, their implementation can sometimes be contentious, particularly within forest ownership, as seen with the Natura 2000 network. The low uptake of Natura 2000 charters and contracts makes it difficult to ascertain the actions of landowners in these protected forest areas. To investigate the behaviour of forest owners in such areas, we conducted semi-directive interviews and a quantitative survey using a closed-ended questionnaire in the Ciron Valley (Gironde, France), which is renowned for its beech forests relics considered as refugia of the last glacial period. Data analysis combining discourse analysis and statistical methods (variable classification and hierarchical ascending classification) revealed six typical behavioural profiles. Three of these reflect a voluntary pro-environmental commitment that can be attributed to ethical, practical, or economic motivations. These groups view the Natura 2000 area as a laboratory for testing environmental and forestry transition paths. The other three groups do not feel strongly compelled by the Natura 2000 environmental regulations, viewing them primarily as binding obligations. Despite their initial hostility towards the Habitats Directive in the 2000s, a sense of belonging to, and a collective defence of, the site is now emerging. The appropriation of the site reflects real changes in pro-environmental behaviour, as well as the strategic use of its protected status. The focus of the debate has shifted, with discussions now centring on the most appropriate types of environmental action and their relevance within broader contexts, such as climate change mitigation.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
